Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Clin Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 August 5.
Published in final edited form as:
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 May; 77(5): 688–689.
doi:  10.4088/JCP.15l10318
PMCID: PMC5544938

Open-Label Trial on the Effects of Memantine in Adults With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder After a Single Ketamine Infusion

Carolyn I. Rodriguez, M.D., Ph.D.,a,b Amanda Levinson, B.S.,c Jordana Zwerling, M.A.,a Donna Vermes, PMHNP,d,e and Helen Blair Simpson, M.D., Ph.D.d,e


The only first-line pharmacological treatments recommended for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs).1 We found that a single intravenous (IV) dose of ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor antagonist, rapidly decreases symptoms in unmedicated patients with OCD,2 demonstrating that a drug affecting glutamate transmission can reduce OCD symptoms without an SRI. After study participation, patients often requested a drug with similar effects to ketamine that could be taken as an outpatient. Memantine shares a similar mechanism of action as ketamine, ie, NMDA glutamate receptor antagonism, albeit with less affinity3 to the receptor than ketamine. It has been shown to decrease OCD symptoms in some when given orally over 12 weeks.411 Given memantine is available in oral dosing and may be easier to access than ketamine in outpatient treatment, we explored in an open-label pilot trial whether response to one NMDA receptor antagonist (IV ketamine) might predict response to a second NMDA receptor antagonist (oral memantine) in a sample of convenience - unmedicated adults with OCD who had recently finished participation in a trial of IV ketamine. We also sought to explore memantine’s clinical effects and tolerability when given after ketamine.


To accurately document history of ketamine effects, we recontacted (with institutional review board approval) 15 adults with OCD who participated in a prior ketamine study in which half met response criteria (≥35% reduction on Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale [Y-BOCS]12) seven days post a single 0.5mg/kg intravenous (IV) dose. Twelve agreed to participate and provided informed consent. At the time of the ketamine study, all met DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria for OCD with at least moderate symptoms (Y-BOCS score ≥16). At the time of the memantine trial, all were unmedicated and 2 had symptoms of mild to moderate depression. As shown in Table 1, the weeks since their ketamine infusion varied as did their OCD severity as measured by the Y-BOCS prior to starting memantine. Ketamine responders averaged 38.8 days (SD = 32.0) and ketamine non-responders averaged 26.1 days (SD = 26.4) before memantine administration; there was no significant difference in the time since prior ketamine treatment between the two t(10)=0.615, p=0.552).

Table 1
Clinical Characteristics and History of Ketamine Responsea in Unmedicated OCD patients (n=12) Treated with Open-Label Memantine for 6 to 12 Weeks

Open-label memantine was started at 5mg daily and titrated by 5mg weekly to 10mg twice daily for up to 6 weeks. Memantine was continued to 12 weeks in those with treatment response13 either to ketamine (≥35% Y-BOCS reduction one week after IV ketamine) or current response to memantine (≥35% Y-BOCS reduction from pre- to post- 6 weeks of memantine). At baseline, 6, and 12 weeks, an independent evaluator, blind to study design, evaluated OCD symptoms (Y-BOCS), depression (HDRS-17), and anxiety (Hamilton Anxiety Inventory [HAM-A]). Paired t-tests assessed change from pre-memantine (baseline) to post-mematine (6 weeks) using the last available observation.


Of the 12 who started memantine, 8 completed six weeks and 3 completed 12 weeks. Overall, the 12 patients showed no significant changes 6 weeks post-memantine on YBOCS (t(11)=1.28, p=.23), HDRS-17 (t(11)=1.85, p=.09), and HAM-A (t(11)=-.09, p=.93). In those who did not respond to IV ketamine (n=8), they did not respond to oral memantine either (Table 1). However, they did report side effects of dizziness (n=2) and anxiety (n=3), which led 3 to drop out early. In those who did respond to IV ketamine (n=4), the story was more complex. Subject 1 lost his ketamine response at the time of starting memantine and regained his treatment response after six weeks of memantine but not after 12 weeks of memantine. Subject 2 seemed to maintain his response to ketamine (although it is not clear how long the beneficial effects of ketamine would have lasted without the memantine) and by his verbal report after 12 weeks of mematine; however, when he discontinued his mematine at week 12, he relapsed two weeks later. Subject 3 also seemed to maintain his ketamine response after six weeks of memantine (34% decrease from initial score of 29 on the YBOCS). Subject 4 responded so robustly to ketamine that it was impossible to assess further benefit from memantine.


In ketamine nonresponders, none responded subsequently to oral memantine. In ketamine responders, memantine may have helped 1 patient temporarily regain the ketamine effects and 2 two maintained the ketamine effects, although it is not possible to rule out whether ketamine’s effect would have persisted without memantine. Another responded so well to ketamine it was not possible to assess memantine’s effects. In this sample of convenience with variable time between treatments, we learned that in ketamine responders, ketamine affects individuals in unique trajectories. How these trajectories intersect with mematine’s effects awaits a confirmatory large randomized trial.

This sample had a low rate of response to memantine compared to prior studies,411 which could have occurred for 2 reasons: (1) in contrast to prior trials, our sample was not on an SRI, and 2) 8 of the 12 participants had no response to ketamine, which means we may have selected patients unresponsive to NMDA modulation, the putative mechanism of ketamine and memantine.

Limitations of this exploratory open-label pilot study include small sample size, lack of randomization and blinding, and high drop rate due to side effects and nonresponse. It is also important to highlight that ketamine and memantine have similar (but not identical) mechanisms of action via NMDA receptor antagonism.


We thank those individuals with OCD who generously donated their time to participate in this research study.

Funding support: This investigation was supported by grants from National Institutes of Mental Health K23MH092434 (Dr. Rodriguez) and K24MH09155 (Dr. Simpson).


Previous Presentation: None

Financial disclosures: Dr. Rodriguez and Ms. Levinson, Zwerling, and Vermes report no additional financial or other relationships relevant to the subject of this letter. Dr. Simpson has received royalties from Cambridge University Press and UpToDate, Inc.

Clinical Trials Registration:; registration number: NCT00956085.


1. Koran LM, Hanna GL, Hollander E, Nestadt G, Simpson HB. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;164(7 Suppl):5–53. [PubMed]
2. Rodriguez CI, Kegeles LS, Levinson A, et al. Randomized controlled crossover trial of ketamine in obsessive-compulsive disorder: proof-of-concept. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Nov;38(12):2475–2483. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Johnson JW, Kotermanski SE. Mechanism of action of memantine. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006 Feb;6(1):61–67. [PubMed]
4. Pasquini M, Biondi M. Memantine augmentation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Aug 30;30(6):1173–1175. [PubMed]
5. Poyurovsky M, Weizman R, Weizman A, Koran L. Memantine for treatment-resistant OCD. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;162(11):2191–2192. [PubMed]
6. Aboujaoude E, Barry JJ, Gamel N. Memantine augmentation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open-label trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Feb;29(1):51–55. [PubMed]
7. Feusner JD, Kerwin L, Saxena S, Bystritsky A. Differential Efficacy of Memantine for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder vs. Generalized Anxiety Disorder: An Open-Label Trial. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2009;42(1):81–93. [PubMed]
8. Stewart SE, Jenike EA, Hezel DM, et al. A single-blinded case-control study of memantine in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Feb;30(1):34–39. [PubMed]
9. Ghaleiha A, Entezari N, Modabbernia A, et al. Memantine add-on in moderate to severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Feb;47(2):175–180. [PubMed]
10. Bakhla AK, Verma V, Soren S, Sarkhel S, Chaudhury S. An open-label trial of memantine in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. Ind Psychiatry J. 2013 Jul;22(2):149–152. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Haghighi M, Jahangard L, Mohammad-Beigi H, et al. In a double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled trial, adjuvant memantine improved symptoms in inpatients suffering from refractory obsessive-compulsive disorders (OCD) Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013 Aug;228(4):633–640. [PubMed]
12. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):1006–1011. [PubMed]
13. Tolin DF, Abramowitz JS, Diefenbach GJ. Defining response in clinical trials for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a signal detection analysis of the Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;66(12):1549–1557. [PubMed]