Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jcmmopenLink to Publisher's site
J Cell Mol Med. 2017 August; 21(8): 1503–1512.
Published online 2017 March 15. doi:  10.1111/jcmm.13077
PMCID: PMC5543505

Intracoronary allogeneic cardiosphere‐derived stem cells are safe for use in dogs with dilated cardiomyopathy


Cardiosphere‐derived cells (CDCs) have been shown to reduce scar size and increase viable myocardium in human patients with mild/moderate myocardial infarction. Studies in rodent models suggest that CDC therapy may confer therapeutic benefits in patients with non‐ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of allogeneic CDC in a large animal (canine) model of spontaneous DCM. Canine CDCs (cCDCs) were grown from a donor dog heart. Similar to human CDCs, cCDCs express CD105 and are slightly positive for c‐kit and CD90. Thirty million of allogeneic cCDCs was infused into the coronary vessels of Doberman pinscher dogs with spontaneous DCM. Adverse events were closely monitored, and cardiac functions were measured by echocardiography. No adverse events occurred during and after cell infusion. Histology on dog hearts (after natural death) revealed no sign of immune rejection from the transplanted cells.

Keywords: cardiosphere‐derived cells, dogs, dilated cardiomyopathy, stem cell therapy, allogeneic


Heart diseases remain the number one killer in western countries 1. Stem cell transplantation is a promising therapeutic strategy for acute or chronic cardiomyopathy, considering current treatments for human DCM usually involve intense drug regimen and/or invasive implantable devices 2. Small animal (rodent) studies are widely adopted for initial proof of concept 3. However, translation to human trials necessitates large animal studies (e.g. pigs, dogs). One dilemma is that many naturally occurring cardiomyopathies in humans cannot be modelled effectively in the laboratory. Interestingly, naturally occurring cardiomyopathy also affects the well‐being of domestic dogs. For instance, in Doberman pinschers, the DCM appears to represent a major cause of death 4. Dog and human DCMs share significant clinical similarities including but not limited to ascites, rhythm disruption, dyspnoea, syncope and sudden death 5, 6, 7, which inspired us to ask the following: can we use Doberman pinschers with DCM as a spontaneously occurring, clinically relevant large animal model of cardiomyopathy from which to translate cell‐based therapies for humans? The safety of adult stem cell therapy for heart diseases has been well established in humans 8. Over the last 7 years, our laboratory has been studying CDCs as a source to generate therapeutic cardiac progenitor cells for ischaemic heart diseases. A recent clinical trial indicates that CDC therapy benefits patients with mild‐to‐moderate myocardial infarction (MI) 9. The regenerative potential of CDCs has also been demonstrated in non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy 10, 11, and thus, we hypothesize intracoronary CDC therapy can provide a safe and effective intervention for DCM; in addition, successful implementation of this intervention in a canine model of DCM will provide valuable insight into our ability to apply this technique to treat DCM in human beings.

Materials and methods

Derivation and culture of cCDCs

Canine CDCs were generated and expanded as described 3, 12 from myocardial specimens of a healthy male beagle dog 8, 13. Briefly, this tissue was surgically collected from the right ventricle of a 2‐year‐old canine beagle. An approximately 6 × 6 mm piece of myocardial tissue was separated and washed with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA., USA). The tissue sample was then cut into smaller biopsy‐sized pieces and washed three times with PBS, followed by enzymatic digestion at 37°C in 5 mg/ml collagenase IV solution (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 5 min. Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (IMDM; Life Technologies) containing 20% foetal bovine serum (FBS; Corning, Corning, NY, USA) is then added to the sample to inactivate the collagenase. After that, the tissue samples were further minced into smaller tissue explants (~ 0.5 × 0.5 mm) before plating. Approximately 50 pieces of tissue explants were then placed onto a fibronectin‐coated plate with approximately 1.5 cm between each explant and covered with 2 ml of IMDM with 20% FBS overnight to aid the attachment. The cultures were maintained in 25–30 ml IMDM with 20% FBS, and media change was performed every other day. In about one week, cells started to outgrow from the tissue explants. Once these outgrowth cells are about 70–80% confluent, they were harvested by 5–10 min. of incubation with TrypLE Select™ (Life Technologies). The cells were then seeded into an ultra‐low‐attachment flask (Corning) at a density of 100,000 cells/cm2 and cultured in IMDM with 10% FBS. Phase‐bright canine cardiospheres (CSps) started to form in 3–7 days. Canine CSps were then collected from the low‐attachment flasks and replated onto fibronectin‐coated surface to produce adherent cCDCs. cCDCs were cultured in IMDM with 20% FBS media and passaged every 3–5 days.

Flow cytometry analysis

cCDCs were characterized by flow cytometry as described 13, 14. Flow cytometry was performed on cCDCs using a FACSCalibur and LSR II (BD) and analysed using FLOWJO software (TreeStar, Carrboro, NC, USA). Cells were incubated with antibodies against CD105 (ab156756; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), CD90 (bd555595; BD Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), CD117 (c‐kit, b5631; Abcam) for 60 min. Isotype‐identical antibodies served as negative controls.

Release testing for cCDCs before injection into the dog patients

Gram stain testing (77730‐1KT‐F; Sigma‐Aldrich) was used for sterility testing for the final cell therapy product. Endotoxin testing was employed (N283‐06; Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) to ensure the cCDC product was endotoxin‐free. Cell viability and morphology were verified by trypan blue before infusion. Catheter cell retention testing was performed to ensure there was minimal cell loss between cell preparation and infusion into the heart chamber.

Dog study protocol

All animal work is compliant with Institutional Animal Care and Usage Committee at North Carolina State University. Once client‐owned dogs showed signs of DCM and a left ventricular shortening fraction of <20% accompanied by LV dilatation, they were recruited from North Carolina to participate in the study. After informed consent signed by the dog owners, the dogs were randomized to either the CDC group or the control group (no cell therapy, only standard care). Dogs placed into the CDC group were given treatment 1 month after criteria were met. This study plan consisted of taking measurements over a twelve‐month period and contained five dogs in the CDC group (age 1768 ± 413 days) and three dogs in the control group (age 2366 ± 531 days). Subject information can be found on Table 1.

Table 1
Dog study design

Infusion of cCDCs

Following premedication with butorphanol (0.3 mg/kg intramuscularly) and placement of an indwelling intravenous catheter, anaesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.2 mg/kg IV) and etomidate (0.35 mg/kg IV). Following routine endotracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with a continuous rate infusion of fentanyl (0.2 μg/kg/min) combined with the lowest concentration of inhaled isoflurane needed to maintain a surgical plane of anaesthesia. Total anaesthetic duration for the procedures averaged 50 min.

The dog was moved to a right lateral recumbent position in the cardiac catheterization suite, and following aseptic preparation of the skin, a surgical cut down was performed in the right femoral triangle, exposing the right femoral artery. The artery was isolated and ligated distally with 3‐0 silk suture, and a 5 Fr × 7 cm Intradyn Braun vascular access sheath was introduced using modified Seldinger technique. A 5‐Fr. JR2.5 was advanced into the aorta under fluoroscopic guidance, and the right coronary ostium was engaged. A selective right coronary angiogram was performed utilizing a hand injection of 5 cc of nonionic contrast media Omnipaque (Y503; GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) to confirm catheter placement. The catheter was then gently flushed with 5 ml of LRS (07‐19‐63‐782; Baxter, Deerfield, IL, USA). 1 ml of PBS was then flushed into the right coronary artery over 30 sec., followed by a 5 ml suspension of stem cells over 5 min., followed by another 2 ml of PBS over an additional minute. The right Judkins catheter was then removed. A 5‐Fr. left Judkins catheter (JL3.5, 80 cm long) was then advanced under fluoroscopic guidance to engage the left coronary ostium, and a selective angiogram was performed with a hand injection of 5 ml of Omnipaque to confirm the catheter position. In a fashion identical to the right coronary injection, the catheter was gently flushed with 5 ml of LRS. Two millilitres of PBS was then flushed into the left main coronary artery over 30 sec., followed by a 10 ml suspension of stem cells over 5 min., followed by another 4 ml of PBS over an additional minute. Following the last injection of PBS, the catheter was removed, the catheter sheath introducer was removed from the artery, and the artery was double‐ligated with 3‐0 silk suture. The cut down incision was closed routinely, and recovery from anaesthesia was uneventful.

Echocardiography measurement

Dogs were manually restrained, and all echocardiographic studies were performed using a Phillips IE‐33 echocardiographic system with simultaneous ECG. Standard imaging planes were obtained 15, and all data were captured digitally for offline analysis at a digital workstation. For this pilot safety study, simple M‐mode measurements of left ventricle end‐diastolic and end‐systolic dimensions (LVEDD and LVESD, respectively) were obtained from the right parasternal short‐axis image at the level of the chordae according to recommendations set by the American Society of Echocardiography 16. The average of three measurements from different sinus cardiac cycles was obtained. Fractional shortening (FS) was calculated from the M‐mode echocardiographic images as (LVEDD—LVESD/LVEDD) × 100%. As another indicator of cardiac function, per cent wall thickness (%WT) was determined using (end‐systolic wall thickness ‐ end‐diastolic wall thickness)/end‐diastolic wall thickness × 100% 17.


Hearts were collected from canine patients after natural death and washed with PBS to remove excess biological fluids. Samples were either frozen in OCT compound (Tissue‐Tek) or placed in formalin and later processed into paraffin blocks. Heart sections (5 μm thick) were prepared from paraffin blocks. Haematoxylin and eosin stains were performed on samples (MHS1; Sigma‐Aldrich).

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

To detect the male donor cells in the female recipient heart, we perform Y‐chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Two hundred nanograms from each sample was labelled using nick translation to incorporate one of three fluorochromes, Spectrum Red/Orange/Green dUTP (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA). Typically, 25 ng of each of five differentially labelled probes was pooled and precipitated in the presence of 15 μg of sonicated genomic dog DNA as competitor. Chromosome preparation, probe hybridization and post‐hybridization washes were performed as described previously 18, 19. Chromosomes were counterstained in 80 ng/ml 4′, 6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) and mounted in antifade solution (Vectashield; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Images were acquired and processed using a multicolour FISH workstation comprising a fluorescence microscope [Olympus BX61 (Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan) with zero shift, narrowband filters] CCD camera (CoolSnapHQ, Photometrics, Tuscon, AZ, USA) both driven by dedicated software (SmartCapture 2.3.1 Digital Scientific, Cambridge, UK). The digital image of each DAPI‐stained metaphase spread was processed using a high‐pass spatial filter to reveal enhanced DAPI bands. Clones were assigned to a chromosome region according to the DAPI‐banded nomenclature of Breen et al. 18, 19.

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as mean ± S.D. unless specified otherwise. Comparisons between any two groups were performed using two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test. Comparisons among more than two groups were performed using one‐way anova followed by post hoc Bonferroni correction. Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.1.


Generation of cCDCs

Using a three‐stage ‘adhesion–suspension–adhesion’ culture process (Fig. (Fig.1A),1A), we derived CDCs from the myocardial tissues of a male Beagle dog donor. Both phase‐bright and stromal‐like cells started to outgrow from the canine heart tissue explants in a week after plating onto fibronectin‐coated surfaces. Those outgrowth cells become confluent in ~2–3 weeks (Fig. (Fig.1B).1B). When seeded on low‐attachment surfaces (to discourage cell attachment), the outgrowth cells spontaneously aggregate into three‐dimensional canine cardiospheres (Fig. (Fig.1C).1C). When replated onto a fibronectin‐coated surface, the cardiospheres dissociated into single cells which we termed CDC (Fig. (Fig.1D).1D). One biopsy‐sized canine heart tissue can generate 50–200 million of passage 0 CDCs. Flow cytometry analysis (Fig. (Fig.1E)1E) reveals that cCDCs were positive for CD105, similar to human CDCs.

Figure 1
Derivation and culture of canine CDCs. (A) Schematic diagram showing the derivation of canine CDC a of Beagle dog. (B) Outgrowth cells from plated myocardial tissues. (C) Cardiosphere formation in suspension culture. (D) CDCs dissociated from cardiospheres. ...

Intracoronary infusion of CDCs in Doberman pinscher with DCM

Catheter testing performed before infusion verified a low amount of cell loss through delivery, with >98% of cells passing through the catheter. Canine CDCs were harvested by TrypLE Select, placed in PBS with 100 U/ml heparin and stored at 4°C. Cell viability was >80% for up to 5 hrs (Fig. (Fig.2A)2A) under this storage condition. The cells were infused with a regimen that was similarly applied in a previous human trial (Fig. (Fig.2B)2B) 8. Coronary angiography (Fig. (Fig.2C)2C) shows the placement of the infusion catheter in the patient's left main and right coronary artery (RCA). The infusion dose in each artery was described in Figure Figure22D.

Figure 2
Cell infusion procedure. (A) Viability of CDCs stored at 4°C. (B) Intracoronary cell infusion design. (C) Coronary angiography showing catheter placement in left main and RCA. (D) Schematic diagram showing the infusion dose.

Effects of CDC therapy on cardiac functions of canines with DCM

Representative echocardiography image of a control and CDC‐treated animal at end‐point shows the wall motions of the heart (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A). As an indicator of cardiac function, fractional shortening (FS%) continued to deteriorate in the control group (Fig. (Fig.3B,3B, black lines). In contrast, CDC treatment robustly preserved FS% (Fig. (Fig.3B,3B, red lines) with a combination of responders and non‐responders to the CDC treatment. Treatment effects were calculated as the change in FS% from the baseline to end‐point (Fig. (Fig.3C).3C). A similar trend was found in per cent wall thickness, which was used as an another indicator of cardiac function (Fig. (Fig.3D3D and E). Intragroup analysis indicated decreases in FS% and WT% in the control group (Fig. (Fig.4A4A and B), while CDC treatment protected FS% and WT% (Fig. (Fig.4C4C and D). Left ventricular diameter diastolic (LVDd) and left ventricular diameter systolic (LVDs) were measured at baseline and end‐point (Fig. (Fig.5).5). In general, the changes in LV dimensions were indistinguishable between the two groups. The control and CDC treatment groups had similar brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (Fig. (Fig.6A)6A) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) (Fig. (Fig.6B)6B) levels at baseline and end‐point. This was measured to ensure the cell infusion did not exacerbate myocardial damage.

Figure 3
Effects of CDC therapy on cardiac function. (A) Representative echocardiography images showing control and CDC‐treated dogs at end‐point. (B) Fractional shortening (FS%) comparison between control and CDC groups. (C) Treatment effects ...
Figure 4
Intragroup analysis of FS% and WT% in control and CDC‐treated animals. (A) FS% at baseline and end‐point for the dogs in the control group. (B) WT% at baseline and end‐point for the dogs in the control group. (C) FS% at baseline ...
Figure 5
Left ventricle dimensions. (A) Comparison of LVDd change over the time between control and CDC groups. (B) LVDd at baseline and end‐point for the dogs in the control group (C) LVDd at baseline and end‐point for the dogs in the CDC group. ...
Figure 6
Cardiac failure and injury markers. (A) Comparison of serum BNP levels in control and CDC groups before and after infusion. (B) Comparison of serum cTNI levels in control and CDC groups before and after infusion. End‐point was consistent for all ...

Allogeneic CDC infusion does not engraft or cause immune rejection in the heart

Autopsy on hearts from CDC‐treated, and control, dogs were sliced for gross inspection (Fig. (Fig.7A).7A). Survival rates were similar for each group (Fig. (Fig.7B).7B). No tumour formation was detected. Representative FISH staining (Fig. (Fig.7C)7C) revealed no male donor cells in the female recipient heart. Haematoxylin and eosin staining shows the lack of concentration of cell nuclei (Fig. (Fig.7D),7D), when compared to control heart (Fig. (Fig.7E),7E), or a healthy (normal) heart (Fig. (Fig.7F),7F), suggesting the allogeneic CDC infusion did not elicit an immune response from the heart. This was consistent from our previous findings in rat and human allogeneic CDC transplantations.

Figure 7
Heart histology. (A) Transversal section of CDC‐treated canine heart (B) Survival data comparing control (n = 3) and CDC‐treated (n = 5) groups. (C) Representative FISH stain showing lack of engraftment of infused male allogeneic cCDC ...


The last decade witnessed a burst of cell therapy trials for ischaemic cardiomyopathy. For the last 7 years, our laboratory has been studying CDCs and recently showed the regenerative potential of CDCs in a mouse model of induced DCM 20. Results from a recent clinical trial also indicated that infusion of autologous CDCs in patients with mild‐to‐moderate myocardial infarction reduced scar but increased viable tissue 8. A phase II clinical trial is ongoing to test the regenerative potential of allogeneic CDCs in patients with recent MI 21.

Domestic dogs suffer from a variety of spontaneously occurring heart diseases. In Doberman pinschers, the autosomal dominant inheritance pattern of DCM described in some families is similar to that of DCM in humans 7, 22. Expected survival time in Dobermans is strikingly short, and current treatment is symptomatic and palliative. This provides us with an excellent opportunity to use the Doberman pinscher as a naturally occurring model of DCM for CDC therapy.

In the present study, we demonstrate that cCDCs can be derived from adult dog hearts and that they are phenotypically similar to human and rodent CDCs (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Similar to human CDCs 20, cCDCs are positive for CD105 but have low expressions of CD90 and ckit. Recent studies have shown that ckit expression is irrelevant to the overall therapeutic benefit of CDCs, while CD90 expression undermines the regenerative potential of CDCs 23, 24. Allogeneic CDCs have proven to be safe in both rat models of myocardial infarction 25 and in an ongoing human trial 23, and the results of using allogeneic cCDCs derived from a Beagle dog donor for treating Doberman pinscher dogs with DCM appear to confirm this finding in dogs as well.

Before the cell infusion procedure, lot release criteria testing was performed to ensure the cell therapy product was free of bacterial agents, mycoplasma and endotoxin. In addition, we performed a storage stability assay to check for how long can the cells remained viable while being stored in the infusion solution at 4°C. Our data indicated that cell viability was >80% up to 5 hrs after collection (Fig. (Fig.2A),2A), which provided abundant time for the myocardial distribution and infiltration of viable stem cells, as well as maintained secretion of growth factors for treatment. In addition, any normal delay in patient preparation for infusion would have little adverse effects on cell viability in clinical.

As DCM induces widespread myocardial dysfunction, it is essential to distribute large number of therapeutic stem cells globally. We designed a two‐vessel infusion protocol to cover the entire heart: 20 million cells into the left main artery and 10 million cells into the RCA (Fig. (Fig.2C2C and D). To ensure a fast and safe treatment, we devised a ‘wash–cell–wash’ infusion plan that allowed for an infusion to take less than 20 min. as well as ensuring no excessive cell accumulation in the vessel (Fig. (Fig.2B).2B). The infusion scheme used here has also been applied to human patients. Previous studies have investigated the cardiac benefits of stem cells through intramyocardial injection in rodent models successfully 26, 27, but this method is invasive and limited to local areas of myocardium. Catheter‐based intra‐arterial infusion of stem cell therapies delivered at the time of myocardial reperfusion is emerging as a promising candidate to improve LV dysfunction in porcine model of MI 28, 29. In our present study, we applied intracoronary infusion by two vessels which involved left main artery and RCA, which we hope ensured the global distribution of therapeutic stem cells. In addition, delivering cells by ‘wash–cell–wash’ method may reduce the retention of stem cells in the coronary vessel, presumably promoting beneficial effects in remote areas of the heart.

DCM is characterized by progressive ventricular dilatation and contractile dysfunction. While there was no significant change in LVDd and LVDs from baseline to end‐point for both control and CDC groups (Fig. (Fig.5),5), our results revealed a consistent protection of FS% and WT% by the CDC therapy (Fig. (Fig.3).3). CDC therapy may also mitigate the progression of ventricular enlargement and deterioration of myocardial systolic function (Fig. (Fig.4).4). According to previous studies 10, 30, CDCs could promote cardiomyocyte proliferation and protect myocytes from antioxidant, antifibrotic and anti‐inflammatory injury. Cardiac stretch indicators (NT‐BNP) and cell injury markers (cTNI) showed no significant difference between the control and CDC groups (Fig. (Fig.6),6), suggesting cell infusion had no benefit, but also did not exacerbate myocardial stretch or damage as measured by these biomarkers.

Compared to autologous cell therapy, allogeneic cell products offer several benefits, namely the short time required for production and the low cost per dosage. In addition, patient‐specific tissue harvesting and cell processing may introduce possible variations in cell potency related to patient age and disease 31. One major concern of allogeneic therapy is the potential risk of host immune response. Previous studies have investigated the safety of allogeneic CDC transplantation in rats and pigs with myocardial infarction 25, 28, but the safety and efficacy of allogeneic CDCs in DCM models have not been explored. Here, we tested the specific hypothesis that allogenic CDCs could not engraft permanently in transplanted myocardium, but could still exert therapeutic effects. No immune cell infiltration was observed in the recipient heart (Fig. (Fig.7),7), which attested the safety of allogeneic cell therapy in the DCM model 25.It has been reported that there were no circulating antidonor antibodies after allogeneic CDC transplantation in rats with MI 25. In addition, the amount and volume of CDC therapy are relatively small compared to those in blood transfusion, and it has also been shown that injected CDCs do not persist beyond 3 weeks in the heart 25. Thus, the absence of such sensitization may explain why allogeneic cells could be survived in recipient. These results open the door to many different allogeneic treatments that can be tested in the future.

In summary, we derived cCDCs from adult dog hearts and showed their safety in an allogeneic canine DCM model.


There are some limitations to this study. The use of client‐owned animals that matched criteria for study limited the total number of animals that could be used. This limitation in sample size prevented our ability to find true significance in many factors that were trending towards significance. Another limitation is that only one cell donor was used for all cell recipients.

Conflicts of interest

The authors confirm that there are no conflict of interests.


This work was supported by National Institute of Health, an intramural grant from NC State College of Veterinary Medicine, and a pilot grant from NC State Comparative Medicine Institute. J.T. is supported by China Scholarship Council.


1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al ; on behalf of the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee . Heart disease and stroke statistics— 2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association [published online ahead of print December 17, 2014]. Circulation 2015; 131: e29–e322. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152. [PubMed]
2. Hazebroek M, Dennert R, Heymans S. Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: possible triggers and treatment strategies. Neth Heart J. 2012; 20: 332–5. [PubMed]
3. Hensley MT, Andrade J, Keene B, et al Cardiac regenerative potential of cardiosphere‐derived cells from adult dog hearts. JCMM. 2015; 19: 1805–13. [PubMed]
4. Cheng K, Malliaras K, Li TS, et al Magnetic enhancement of cell retention, engraftment and functional benefit after intracoronary delivery of cardiac‐derived stem cells in a rat model of ischemia/reperfusion. Cell Transplant. 2012; 21: 1121–35. [PubMed]
5. Cesselli D, Jakoniuk I, Barlucchi L, et al Oxidative stress‐mediated cardiac cell death is a major determinant of ventricular dysfunction and failure in dog dilated cardiomyopathy. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 279–86. [PubMed]
6. Dukes‐McEwan J, Borgarelli M, Tidholm A, et al Proposed guidelines for the diagnosis of canine idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Vet Cardiol. 2003; 2: 7–19. [PubMed]
7. Smucker ML, Kaul S, Woodfield JA, et al Naturally occurring cardiomyopathy in the doberman pinscher: a possible large animal model of human cardiomyopathy? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 16: 200–6. [PubMed]
8. Makkar RR, Smith RR, Cheng K, et al Intracoronary cardiosphere‐derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): a prospective, randomised phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2012; 379: 895–904. [PubMed]
9. Malliaras K, Makkar RR, Smith RR, et al Intracoronary cardiosphere‐derived cells after myocardial infarction: evidence of therapeutic regeneration in the final 1‐year results of the CADUCEUS trial (CArdiosphere‐Derived aUtologous stem CElls to reverse ventricUlar dySfunction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63: 110–22. [PubMed]
10. Aminzadeh M, Tseliou E, Sun B, et al Therapeutic efficacy of cardiosphere‐derived cells in a transgenic mouse model of non‐ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2014; 36: 751–562. [PubMed]
11. Gallet R, de Couto G, Simsolo E, et al Cardiosphere‐derived cells reverse heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in rats by decreasing fibrosis and inflammation. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2016; 1: 14–28. [PubMed]
12. Shen D, Cheng K, Marban E. Dose‐dependent functional benefit of human cardiosphere transplantation in mice with acute myocardial infarction. J Cell Mol Med. 2012; 16: 2112–6. [PubMed]
13. Smith RR, Barile L, Cho HC, et al Regenerative potential of cardiosphere‐derived cells expanded from percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy specimens. Circulation. 2007; 115: 896–908. [PubMed]
14. Li TS, Cheng K, Malliaras K, et al Direct comparison of different stem cell types and subpopulations reveals superior paracrine potency and myocardial repair efficacy with cardiosphere‐derived cells. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 942–53. [PubMed]
15. Thomas W, Gaber C, Jacobs G, et al Recommendations for standards in transthoracic two‐dimensional echocardiography in the dog and cat. Echocardiography Committee of the Specialty of Cardiology, American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. J Vet Intern Med. 1993; 7: 247–52. [PubMed]
16. Greenberg B, Massie B, Bristow D, et al Long‐term vasodilator therapy of chronic aortic insufficiency. Circulation. 1998; 78: 92–103. [PubMed]
17. Weil BR, Suzuki G, Leiker MM, et al Comparative efficacy of intracoronary allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells and cardiosphere‐derived cells in swine with hibernating myocardium. Circulation. 2015; 117: 634–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Breen M, Jouquand S, Renier C, et al Chromosome‐specific single‐locus FISH probes allow anchorage of an 1800‐marker integrated radiation‐hybrid/linkage map of the domestic dog genome to all chromosomes. Genome Res. 2001; 11: 1784–95. doi:10.1101/gr.189401. [PubMed]
19. Breen M, Bullerdiek J, Langford CF. The DAPI banded karyotype of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) generated using chromosome‐specific paint probes. Chromosome Res. 1999; 7: 401–406. doi:10.1023/A:1009224232134. [PubMed]
20. Li TS, Cheng K, Lee ST, et al Cardiospheres recapitulate a niche‐like microenvironment rich in stemness and cell‐matrix interactions, rationalizing their enhanced functional potency for myocardial repair. Stem Cells. 2010; 28: 2088–98. [PubMed]
21. [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): Allogeneic Heart Stem Cells to Achieve Myocardial Regeneration (ALLSTAR); 2011. [updated 2014 July 14; cited 2015 July 05]. Available from:
22. Meurs KM, Fox PR, Norgard M, et al A prospective genetic evaluation of familial dilated cardiomyopathy in the Doberman pinscher. J Vet Intern Med. 2007; 21: 1016–20. [PubMed]
23. Cheng K, Ibrahim A, Hensley MT, et al Relative roles of CD90 and c‐kit to the regenerative efficacy of cardiosphere‐derived cells in humans and in a mouse model of myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014; 3: e001260. doi:10.1161/JAHA.114.001260. [PubMed]
24. Gago‐Lopez N, Awaji O, Zhang Y, et al THY‐1 receptor expression differentiates cardiosphere‐derived cells with divergent cardiogenic differentiation potential. Stem Cell Reports. 2014; 2: 576–91. [PubMed]
25. Malliaras K, Li TS, Luthringer D, et al Safety and efficacy of allogeneic cell therapy in infarcted rats transplanted with mismatched cardiosphere‐derived cells. Circulation. 2012; 125: 100–12. [PubMed]
26. Cheng K, Blusztajn A, Shen D, et al Functional performance of human cardiosphere‐derived cells delivered in an in situ polymerizable hyaluronan‐gelatin. Biomaterials. 2012; 21: 5317–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Cheng K, Shen D, Smith J, et al Transplantation of Platelet Gel Spiked with Cardiosphere‐Derived Cells Boosts Structural and Functional Benefits Relative to Gel Transplantation Alone in Rats with Myocardial Infarction. Biomaterials. 2012; 33: 2872–9. [PubMed]
28. Kanazawa H, Tseliou E, Dawkins JF, et al Durable benefits of cellular postconditioning: long‐term effects of allogeneic cardiosphere‐derived cells infused after reperfusion in pigs with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5: e002796. doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.002796. [PubMed]
29. Kanazawa H, Tseliou E, Malliaras K, et al Cellular postconditioning: allogeneic cardiosphere‐derived cells reduce infarct size and attenuate microvascular obstruction when administered after reperfusion in pigs with acute myocardial infarction. Circ Heart Fail. 2015; 8: 322–332. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001484. [PubMed]
30. Yee K, Malliaras K, Kanazawa H, et al Allogeneic cardiospheres delivered via percutaneous transendocardial injection increase viable myocardium, decrease scar size, and attenuate cardiac dilation in porcine ischemic cardiomyopathy. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e113805. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113805. [PubMed]
31. Dimmeler S, Leri A. Aging and disease as modifiers of efficacy of cell therapy. Circ Res. 2008; 102: 1319–30. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing