Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 7076.
Published online 2017 August 1. doi:  10.1038/s41598-017-07669-9
PMCID: PMC5539228

Hardening of shear band in metallic glass


Strain hardening, originating from defects such as the dislocation, avails conventional metals of high engineering reliability in applications. However, the hardenability of metallic glass is a long-standing concern due to the lack of similar defects. In this work, we carefully examine the stress-strain relationship in three bulk monolithic metallic glasses. The results show that hardening is surely available in metallic glasses if the effective load-bearing area is considered instantly. The hardening is proposed to result from the remelting and ensuing solidification of the shear-band material under a hydrostatic pressure imposed by the normal stress during the shear banding event. This applied-pressure quenching densifies the metallic glass by discharging the free volume. On the other hand, as validated by molecular dynamics simulations, the pressure promotes the icosahedral short-range order. The densification and icosahedral clusters both contribute to the increase of the shear strength and therefore the hardening in metallic glasses.


Strain hardening is a highly desired property for structural materials, especially for high-strength engineering metals and alloys1. It renders the strained material harder and increasingly difficult to deform further in the plastic regime, and therefore enables the material to accommodate the plastic strain globally. This prevents premature strain localization like necking in materials under tension and benefits the materials in terms of mechanical reliability. In general, strain hardening is ascribed to the multiplication, interaction or entanglement of dislocations in conventional crystalline metals1. On the contrary, no crystallographic defects like dislocation have been found to make the strain hardening available in monolithic metallic glasses (MGs) so far26. As a result, the plastic strain cannot be spread out in the whole sample; instead, it is often localized into thin shear bands in MGs at room temperature79. Worse yet, this localization is self-catalytic, so one primary shear band carries more and more strain and eventually develops into a crack causing the fracture7. One can easily infer that the lack of strain hardening must lead to a low damage tolerance in MGs. Partly for this reason, MGs are hardly employed in engineering applications despite their very high strength1012.

For the MGs in which the plastic deformation proceeds via shear banding events7, their capability to be hardened substantially depends on the shear band itself13. Recently, Wang et al.14 have shown that the strain hardening is also possible in MGs. Stretching a Zr-based MG rod deeply notched, they found that the strain hardening indeed happened to the notched part. This hardening was attributed to densification as a net effect of free volume creation and annihilation. It must be noted that no shear band is developed in the plastically deformed material in ref. 10. If the shear bands has formed and developed during the plastic deformation of MGs, strain softening was frequently confirmed1518. The softening was considered to result from shear-induced dilation and nano-voids formation and coalescence inside the shear bands15, 17. This notion has widely been accepted in the community19, 20. However, a work-hardenable Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 MG was fabricated by Das et al.21. They achieved ~18% plasticity in the Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 MG under compression. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation exhibited multiple branched and wavy shear bands on the surface of failed sample. It means the sample was not subject to a single dominant shear band. Conversely, a large number of shear bands carried a small fraction of strain each. This manner was associated with the atomic-scale inhomogeneity in the sample21. This kind of inhomogeneity has also been witnessed in other MGs, e.g. Zr63.8Ni16.2Cu15Al5 22 and Zr64.13Cu15.75Ni10.12Al10 23. More interestingly, in the very Zr64.13Cu15.75Ni10.12Al10 MG, Han et al.24 demonstrated that there was no strain hardening or strain softening at all, and the critical flow stress was invariant if the instant load-bearing area was taken into account. As such, a controversial issue arises: can the shear band in MG be hardened ever? This is not only a key problem of science but also directly related to the engineering application of MGs as mentioned above.

In this paper, we investigate the operating characteristics of shear bands in three typical Zr-based MGs through compression tests. The shear bands are found to harden indeed during the plastic deformation when the instant effective load-bearing area is considered. Even though the intrinsic shear strength is taken into account, the hardening is still apparently evident. However, the mechanism of hardening is significantly different from that in crystalline materials dominated by dislocations. Instead, we propose that remelting and solidification under a hydrostatic pressure imposed by the normal stress result in the hardening of the shear band material. Applying a hydrostatic pressure during the quenching process, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations reveal that the formed MG is densified as expected. More importantly, the atomic structure is remarkably tuned by the pressure, as identified by the Voronoi tessellation analysis. In particular, we find that the icosahedral clusters increase with the increasing applied pressure and they are responsible for the increase of shear strength in MGs.


Microstructure investigation

To assure the MGs a fully glassy state, microstructure characterization and thermal analysis have been conducted. Figure 1 presents the XRD pattern and DSC trace for Zr50Cu44Al6. No any Bragg peaks can be seen in Fig. 1a, while the glass transition (marked by T g) and crystallization (marked by T x) behaviors are very clear in Fig. 1b. This implies the glass nature of Zr50Cu44Al6. Owing to their excellent glass forming ability, neither Zr65Cu15Ni10Al10 nor Vit 1 is subject to XRD and DSC25, 26. However, nanocrystals are sometimes observed to precipitate in the glassy matrix by TEM even though they are invisible to XRD technique21, 27, 28. Undoubtedly, these nanocrystals can tailor the properties of the sample. They may hamper the shear band generation and propagation in MGs, since the operation of dislocation and twinning inside the nanocrystals usually cause the strain hardening27. To rule out the presence of nanocrystals in the three MGs of this work, TEM are used. Figure 2a shows the TEM image for Zr50Cu44Al6 MG. The very homogeneous contrast indicates a glassy nature of the sample, which is consistent with selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (the inset) exhibiting a diffuse halo ring. Moreover, lattice fringes corresponding to the crystalline phase cannot be seen in the high resolution TEM (HRTEM) image (Fig. 2b). It corroborates that the sample is a fully monolithic glass. Similar TEM results are obtained in Zr65Cu15Ni10Al10 (see Fig. S1) and Vit 1.

Figure 1
XRD pattern and DSC trace for Zr50Cu44Al6 MG. (a) The XRD pattern for the as-cast Zr50Cu44Al6 alloy shows broad and diffuse maxima, indicating its glassy nature. (b) The DSC (heating rate of 20 K/min) trace for the Zr50Cu44Al6 MG clearly presents ...
Figure 2
The amorphous microstructure of Zr50Cu44Al6 alloy. (a) TEM with a SAED pattern (inset) and (b) HRTEM.

Mechanical performance and the intrinsic shear strength

Figure 3 presents the measurement and observation of the deformation behavior in the Zr50Cu44Al6 MG. In Fig. 3a, the true stress-strain curve (blue) is calculated according to the engineering one (black), in which the calculation is well known in textbooks as1:

εt =  ln(1 + εe)

σtσe(1 + εe)

where ε e, σ e, ε t and σ t are the engineering strain and stress and the true strain and stress, respectively. At the first glance, σ e increases with the increasing ε e in the plastic regime, which is clearer in the inset. In particular, the valley (marked by the violet arrow) of the serration in the latter part are higher than the peak (marked by the green arrow) for that in the first. It looks like the strain hardening. On the other hand, in the true stress-strain curve, stress almost keeps a constant with strain, which is in line with the conclusion by Han et al.24. However, the prerequisite for Eq. (1) that is used to calculate the true stress-strain is the constant volume of the sample1, which implies that the effective load-bearing area increases with the strain due to the decreasing length of the sample in the compression. Figure 3b shows the SEM image of the deformed sample. As marked by the arrows, only one primary shear band develops and accommodates all the plastic strain29, 30. More importantly, one can easily find that the load-bearing area is factually decreasing with the increasing strain, resulting in the invalidity of Eq. (1). As illustrated in Fig. 3c, the horizontal projected area of the instant load-bearing area (shaded region) with a shear angle θ is


where ϕ=arccos(leεptgθ2re), r e and l e are the radius and length of the rod sample at the elastic limit, and ε p is the plastic strain. As a matter of fact, Han et al.24 adopted Eq. (2), but a fixed θ = 45° was taken. According to the statistics by Zhang et al.31, θ is a variable and usually less than 45° in compression, which holds true in this work (θ = 41°). Using A in Eq. (2), the real stress σ r (red) is presented in Fig. 3d, significantly different from σ t (blue). Obviously, σ r increases with the plastic strain, which firmly demonstrates the characteristics of strain hardening. Along the Ludwik-Hollomon relationship32


where σ y, k and n are the yield stress, pre-exponential factor and strain-hardening coefficient, respectively, n = 0.613 is obtained for Zr50Cu44Al6 MG by fitting the stress-strain curve in plastic regime, similar to those for steel (0.36) and brass (0.42)32.

Figure 3
The investigation on the deformation behavior in Zr50Cu44Al6 MG under compression. (a) The engineering (black) and true (blue) stress-strain curves and the inset magnifying the plastic regime. (b) The SEM image of the deformed sample in which the primary ...

Unquestionably, shear band is operating in mode II. Therefore, the shear strength has attracted many attentions. Zhang et al.31 found that the measured shear stress τ depends on the normal stress σ y in the shear plane as illustrated in Fig. 3c. Afterwards, Qu et al.33 formulated the σ y dependence of the critical shear stress (or intrinsic shear strength) τ 0 as


in which α = 2 (1  2ν)/(1 + ν) proposed by Liu et al.34, ν is Poisson’s ratio and β = −0.5 for compression. Figure 3e displays the plot of τ 0 with ε p. Clearly, τ 0 increases with increasing ε p, indicating the hardening of shear-band material. This also holds true in Zr65Cu15Ni10Al10 and Vit 1 MGs (see Figs S3 and S4). It should be noted that σ n also increases with ε p, as shown in Fig. S2.

Occasionally, inside the shear band precipitate some nanocrystallites in the deformed MG sample, though they are absent in the as-prepared sample28, 35, 36. The longitudinal section of the deformed sample in Fig. 3b is exhibited in Fig. 4. A region enclosed by the circle is taken as the TEM sample, in which the approximate path of shear band is marked by the dotted line. Then, the TEM observation is performed carefully, and the TEM imaging features (see details in Fig. S5) are extremely similar to those in Fig. 2. No any nanocrystallites can be found, which essentially excludes the involvement of dislocation-induced hardening in Fig. 3. In other words, there should be a different hardening mechanism in MGs.

Figure 4
The SEM image of longitudinal section of the deformed sample shown in Fig. 2. The dotted line is expected to be the path of the shear band, and the region enclosed by the dashed circle is taken to prepare the TEM sample in Fig. S6.

The role of hydrostatic pressure

Our previous studies showed that the temperature rise is significant inside the shear band during its sliding37, 38. Then they convincingly responded to the argument of no significant temperature rise3841. Besides, the melted shear-band material is subsequently quenched at a ultrahigh cooling rate of ~108 K/s at the end of a shear-banding event37. On the other hand, the hydrostatic pressure P imposed by the normal stress σ n was found to play an important role, as suggested by Zhang et al.31. Generally, it has P2σn3 according to the spherical stress tensor1, and P increases due to the increasing σ n during the plastic deformation (see Fig. S2-1). It implies that the effect of hydrostatic pressure will become greater and greater with the plastic strain. Herein, we do propose that the atomic structure of the shear-band material is remarkably mediated during the remelting and the following solidification under a hydrostatic pressure and therefore becomes more resistant to the shear. To validate this proposal, MD simulations were conducted for Zr50Cu44Al6 MG, but not for Zr65Cu15Ni10Al10 MG or Vit 1 owing to their inaccessible interaction potential so far.

Under a hydrostatic pressure, the glass transition happens at an elevated temperature in MGs42. Figure 5a and b show the reduced volume V r = V/V 0 and the reduced potential energy PE r = PE/|PE 0| (V 0 and |PE 0| are respectively the volume and the absolute value of potential energy at 2000 K) against the temperature under various pressures. Clearly, T g increases with the applied the pressure, as marked by the dashed line. It is because the pressure can enhance the viscosity through reducing the free volume in the sample and therefore rendering the atomic diffusion sluggish37. As shown in Fig. 5c, the average atomic volume contracts greatly with the increasing pressure at a certain temperature. For instance, it is 17.9 Å3 for 0 GPa at 300 K, for 20 GPa with 14% decrement to15.4 Å3. Meanwhile, Fig. 5d shows that positions of the first and second peaks in pair correlation function g(r) shift to the smaller radial distance, indicating that the atoms come closer to each other. Obviously, the Zr50Cu44Al6 MG must be densified by the discharge of the free volume.

Figure 5
Description of glass transition of Zr50Cu44Al6 alloy in MD simulations. (a) The reduced volume V r and (b) the reduced potential engergy PE r against the temperature show an elevated glass transition temperature with the increasing hydrostatic pressure. ...

The reduction of the free volume can always elevate the shear stress in MGs because of τexp(Cvf) in which C is a constant for a given composition and v f is the average free volume per atom19. Figure 6a shows the shear stress-strain curves for samples prepared under various pressures at 300 K. One can see that the shear strength increases with the increasing applied pressure. The shear strength here is defined as the peak value of the shear stress in the curve, i.e. τ m marked in Fig. 6a. This trend is clearly presented in Fig. 6b. Moreover, the shear modulus G shares the same trend. Accordingly, it comes to a conclusion that the hardening presented in Fig. 3e should be caused by the remelting and solidification of shear-band material under a hydrostatic pressure. This effect is experimentally confirmed in a Zr48Cu36Al8Ag8 MG prepared though remelting and pressure-casting43.

Figure 6
The MD simulations of the shear deformation in Zr50Cu44Al6 MG samples prepared under various hydrostatic pressures. (a) The shear stress-strain curves on which the maximum value τ m is defined as the shear strength. (b) The shear strength and ...

Atomic configuration

Based on the Voronoi tessellation analysis, the atomic structure has been examined in the as-prepared and deformed Zr50Cu44Al6 MG. Figure 7a and b schematically present the virginal and 20% shear-strained atomic configurations of Zr50Cu44Al6 MG, respectively. As shown in Fig. 7c, the first five commonest motifs in the virginal samples prepared under the applied pressure (only the results for 0, 5, 10 and 20 GPa are presented here) are <0 2 8 2>, <0 2 8 5>, <0 0 12 0>, <0 2 8 1> and <0 1 10 4>. The fractions of these motifs vary with the applied pressures. Along with the increasing pressure, <0 2 8 1> is subject to a slight decrease in fraction, while the four others grow with different increments. In particular, the fraction of <0 0 12 0> increases from 4.1% for 0 GPa to 9.6% for 20 GPa. In other words, the number of <0 0 12 0> is doubled in virtue of hydrostatic pressure. In fact, <0 0 12 0> represents the icosahedral-short-range-order which is a key feature of microstructure in MGs6, 42, 44. In simple liquids and MGs, icosahedron is proposed to be preferred even over the FCC and HCP packing due to its lower potential energy44. As a result, it needs to exert a larger stress to deform the icosahedra than to deform other clusters45. If the number of icosahedra increases in the sample, the yield stress of the material would be enhanced. This is reflected by Figs 6 and and7c.7c. In addition, the evolution of these motifs is examined during the deformation of the sample. As shown in Fig. 7d, the fraction of icosahedra almost keeps constant within the first elastic strain of 4%. This is because the atomic bonding is not broken or rebuilt but just adjusted slightly in the elastic regime46. In the following strain range of 4% to 12%, the sample yields and deforms plastically, as presented in Fig. 6a. Correspondingly, Fig. 7d reveals that the fraction of icosahedra is reduced noticeably, indicating that icosahedra are disassembled or broken during the yielding and plastic deformation. After the strain of 12%, the fraction of icosahedron changes very slightly, but that for high pressure (e.g. 20 GPa) still remains higher than that for low pressure (e.g. 5 GPa). Interestingly, other motifs basically do not vary very much and almost keeps the original fraction (see details in Fig. S6). This proves that the icosahedra play a prominent role in the deformation of MG indeed.

Figure 7
The examination on atomic structure of Zr50Cu44Al6 MG via MD simulations. The illustrations of (a) as-prepared and (b) 20% shear-strained atomic configurations in the simulation box with a size of about 52 × 52 × 52 ...


However, if the hardening is available in the shear-band material as aforementioned, why do then not the secondary shear bands develop at other sites in the sample? In reality, the increasing stress is partly due to the decreasing load-bearing area as illustrated by the shaded region on the shear plane in Fig. 3c, so the shear stress at other sites is not increased so much as that on the shear plane. On the other hand, the first shear band must initiate somewhere with a relatively lower critical shear stress, say τ 1, compared with that, say τ 2, for elsewhere. A increment of critical shear stress, Δτ, is caused by the hardening. If A(τ 1 + Δτ) < A e τ 2 in which Ae=πre2, the secondary shear bands cannot be activated. This is the situation in present work. Once A(τ 1 + Δτ) > A e τ 2, the secondary and multiple shear bands are probably triggered, which has already been observed by a number of early studies22, 23, 47.

For the MGs under uniaxial tension, the multiple shear bands can hardly develop and only one primary shear band dominates always48, 49. As a matter of fact, the hydrostatic pressure P is negative inside the shear band under tension. Figure 8 shows the structural and deforming features in Zr50Cu44Al6 MG for P = −2 GPa compared with those for P = 0 GPa. As shown in Fig. 8a, the first peak in the g(r) curve shifts towards a larger radial distance r, indicating a lower packing density of atoms. Besides, the fraction of icosahedron characterized by the Voronoi index <0 0 12 0> is less for P = −2 GPa than for P = 0 GPa (Fig. 8b), consistent with the previous result of binary Cu-Zr MG42. Following the discussion above, the shear strength τ m for P = −2 GPa should therefore be lower, which is actually verified in Fig. 8c essentially in agreement with the difference between the compressive and tensile strength of MGs50, 51. As such, the shear band will carry more and more shear strain and eventually develop itself to a crack. This explains the absence of tensile ductility in MGs. Nevertheless, it cannot help to understand the densification and strain hardening in the notched MG sample under tension in ref. 10 where there was no shear band found at all.

Figure 8
The MD simulation of Zr50Cu44Al6 MG under a negative hydrostatic pressure P = −2 GPa. (a) The g(r) curve on which the first peak position shifts to a larger radial distance for P = −2GPa (red) compared ...

It is sometimes found that the stress drops with the strain even with consideration of Eq. (2), especially in the heavily deformed sample. The SEM observation shows that the micro-voids and/or cracks already appear in the shear band in the MG samples subject to the large plastic deformation15, 17, 52. They reduce the effective load-bearing area further and make Eq. (2) invalid. In this work, a small plastic strain less than 3% was therefore applied and no micro-voids or cracks is developed in the shear band as shown in Fig. 4, and therefore the hardening behavior is clearly presented in Figs 3, S3 and S4. Besides, it is sometimes found that the dilatation or cavitation happens to some very local sites in the shear band due to the internal tensile stress5355. For a MG sample under compression, the shear band is globally subject to compressive stress instead of tensile one. As a result, the shear band must be densified and hardened as a whole, though some local regions may undergo the reverse.

In summary, we have investigated the deformation behavior in three monolithic metallic glasses. The hardening behavior is witnessed in the plastic regime when the effective load-bearing area is taken into account instantly. The hardening mechanism is proposed to originate from the remelting and solidification of the shear-band material under a hydrostatic pressure imposed by normal stress on the shear plane. As expected, the shear-band material is densified during the quenching, confirmed by the molecular dynamic simulations. Meanwhile, MD simulations show that the icosahedral clusters are favored by virtue of the pressure. The densification and icosahedra work together to enhance the strength of the metallic glass and therefore achieve the hardening. Our findings and analyses address the issue of the hardenability in metallic glasses to some degree. They help to understand the unique mechanical property more deeply and evaluate the engineering reliability of metallic glasses in applications.


Experimental procedure

Three typical MGs with nominal composition of Zr50Cu44Al6 (at.%), Zr65Cu15Ni10Al10 and Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 (i.e. Vit 1) were prepared by arc-melting and then suction-casting pure metals into a water-cooled copper mold under a Ti-gettered argon atmosphere. The prepared rod-shaped MG samples have a diameter of 2 mm. Their glassy nature was ascertained by XRD method using BRUKER D8 ADVANCE and TEM of TECNAI-F20. Thermal analysis was performed using Perkin Elmer DSC-7 at a heating rate of 20 K/min. As-cast rod samples with an aspect ratio of around 2:1 were compressed using Instron 8562 machine at a strain rate of 10−4 s−1 at room temperature. In particular, great care was taken to ensure the two ends of sample for compression test flat and parallel to each other and perpendicular to the longitudinal loading axis. The samples were unloaded after ~5% total strain without fracture. The deformed samples were investigated by SEM of Philips XL30 instrument and TEM.

MD simulations

In our work, MD simulations were performed to Zr50Cu44Al6 MG due to its accessible embedded-atom method (EAM) potential and details can be found in ref. 56. All the simulations were operated using the LAMMPS package57. The cubic box contains 8,000 atoms with periodic boundary conditions in three dimensions. In the preparation, the sample was first equilibrated at 2,000 K for 2 ns and then was quenched to 300 K at a cooling rate of 1011 K/s in the isobaric-isothermal (NPT) ensemble, during which the box size was adjusted to give the applied pressure. In the shear deformation process, the prepared sample was sheared at a strain rate of 108 s−1 in the canonical NVT ensemble at 300 K. The atomic structure was characterized by Voronoi tessellation.

Electronic supplementary material


We thank Dr. M.Q. Jiang and Dr. D. Şopu for their critical reading and insightful discussion. The financial support by NSFC of China (Nos 51201001 and 51501103) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2014M561550) is really appreciated. Additional support through the German Science Foundation (DFG) under the Leibniz Program (grant EC 111/26-1) and the European Research Council under the ERC Advanced Grant INTELHYB (grant ERC-2013-ADG-340025) is gratefully acknowledged. The numerical calculations are conducted on the supercomputing system in the Supercomputing Center, Shandong University (Weihai).

Author Contributions

Author Contributions

J.G.W., Y.P. and J.E. designed the research. J.G.W., K.K.S. and G.W. performed the experiments. J.G.W., Y.C.H., P.F.G. and L.W. conducted the simulations. All the authors contributed to the manuscript.


Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07669-9

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

J. G. Wang, nc.ude.ues@gjgnaw.

Y. Pan, nc.ude.ues@eynap.


1. Meyers, M. A. & Chawla, K. K. Mechanical Behavior of Materials. (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
2. Cheng YQ, Ma E. Atomic-level structure and structure–property relationship in metallic glasses. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2011;56:379–473. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.12.002. [Cross Ref]
3. Schuh CA, Hufnagel TC, Ramamurty U. Mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 2007;55:4067–4109. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052. [Cross Ref]
4. Sun BA, Wang WH. The fracture of bulk metallic glasses. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2015;74:211–307. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.05.002. [Cross Ref]
5. Miracle DB. A structural model for metallic glasses. Nat. Mater. 2004;3:697–702. doi: 10.1038/nmat1219. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Sheng HW, Luo WK, Alamgir FM, Bai JM, Ma E. Atomic packing and short-to-medium-range order in metallic glasses. Nature. 2006;439:419–425. doi: 10.1038/nature04421. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Greer AL, Cheng YQ, Ma E. Shear bands in metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng. R. 2013;74:71–132. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2013.04.001. [Cross Ref]
8. Wu FF, Zheng W, Wu SD, Zhang ZF, Shen J. Shear stability of metallic glasses. Int. J. Plasticity. 2011;27:560–575. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.08.004. [Cross Ref]
9. Rudnicki JW, Rice JR. Conditions for the localization of deformation in pressure-sensitive dilatant materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 1975;23:371–394. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(75)90001-0. [Cross Ref]
10. Maaß R, Löffler JF. Shear-Band Dynamics in Metallic Glasses. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015;25:2353–2368. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201404223. [Cross Ref]
11. Wondraczek L, et al. Towards Ultrastrong Glasses. Adv. Mater. 2011;23:4578–4586. doi: 10.1002/adma.201102795. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Jang D, Gross CT, Greer JR. Effects of size on the strength and deformation mechanism in Zr-based metallic glasses. Int. J. Plasticity. 2011;27:858–867. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.09.010. [Cross Ref]
13. Zhao P, Li J, Wang Y. Heterogeneously randomized STZ model of metallic glasses: Softening and extreme value statistics during deformation. Int. J. Plasticity. 2013;40:1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.06.007. [Cross Ref]
14. Wang ZT, Pan J, Li Y, Schuh CA. Densification and strain hardening of a metallic glass under tension at room temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;111:135504. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.135504. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Pan J, Chen Q, Liu L, Li Y. Softening and dilatation in a single shear band. Acta Mater. 2011;59:5146–5158. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.047. [Cross Ref]
16. Bei H, Xie S, George EP. Softening Caused by Profuse Shear Banding in a Bulk Metallic Glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;96:105503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.105503. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Song SX, Bei H, Wadsworth J, Nieh TG. Flow serration in a Zr-based bulk metallic glass in compression at low strain rates. Intermetallics. 2008;16:813–818. doi: 10.1016/j.intermet.2008.03.007. [Cross Ref]
18. Jiang MQ, Dai LH. On the origin of shear banding instability in metallic glasses. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 2009;57:1267–1292. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.008. [Cross Ref]
19. Spaepen F. A Microscopic Mechanism for Steady State Inhomogeneous Flow in Metallic Glasses. Acta Metall. 1977;25:407–415. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(77)90232-2. [Cross Ref]
20. Spaepen F. Must shear bands be hot? Nat. Mater. 2006;5:7–8. doi: 10.1038/nmat1552. [Cross Ref]
21. Das J, et al. “Work-Hardenable” ductile bulk metallic glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;94:205501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.205501. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Du XH, et al. Two-glassy-phase bulk metallic glass with remarkable plasticity. App. Phys. Lett. 2007;91:131901. doi: 10.1063/1.2790380. [Cross Ref]
23. Liu YH, et al. Super plastic bulk metallic glasses at room temperature. Science. 2007;315:1385–1388. doi: 10.1126/science.1136726. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Han Z, Yang H, Wu WF, Li Y. Invariant critical stress for shear banding in a bulk metallic glass. App. Phys. Lett. 2008;93:231912. doi: 10.1063/1.3048869. [Cross Ref]
25. Peker A, Johnson WL. A highly processable metallic glass: Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10.0Be22.5. App. Phys. Lett. 1993;63:2342–2344. doi: 10.1063/1.110520. [Cross Ref]
26. Kawamura Y, Shibata T, Inoue A, Masumoto T. Deformation behavior of Zr65Al10Ni10Cu15 glassy alloy with wide supercooled liquid region. App. Phys. Lett. 1996;69:1208–1210. doi: 10.1063/1.117413. [Cross Ref]
27. Pauly S, Gorantla S, Wang G, Kuhn U, Eckert J. Transformation-mediated ductility in CuZr-based bulk metallic glasses. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:473–477. doi: 10.1038/nmat2767. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Chen M, Inoue A, Zhang W, Sakurai T. Extraordinary plasticity of ductile bulk metallic glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;96:245502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.245502. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Maaß R, Klaumünzer D, Preiß EI, Derlet PM, Löffler JF. Single shear-band plasticity in a bulk metallic glass at cryogenic temperatures. Scripta Mater. 2012;66:231–234. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.10.044. [Cross Ref]
30. Chen Y, Jiang MQ, Dai LH. Collective evolution dynamics of multiple shear bands in bulk metallic glasses. Int. J. Plasticity. 2013;50:18–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.03.010. [Cross Ref]
31. Zhang ZF, He G, Eckert J, Schultz L. Fracture Mechanisms in Bulk Metallic Glassy Materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003;91:045505. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.045505. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Meyers, M. A. Dynamic Behavior of Materials. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994).
33. Qu RT, Zhang ZF. A universal fracture criterion for high-strength materials. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:1117. doi: 10.1038/srep01117. [Cross Ref]
34. Liu ZQ, Qu RT, Zhang ZF. Elasticity dominates strength and failure in metallic glasses. J. App. Phys. 2015;117:014901. doi: 10.1063/1.4905349. [Cross Ref]
35. Kim J-J, Choi Y, Suresh S, Argon AS. Nanocrystallization during nanoindentation of a bulk amorphous metal alloy at room temperature. Science. 2002;295:654. [PubMed]
36. Yavari AR, et al. Crystallization during bending of a Pd-based metallic glass detected by x-ray microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;109:085501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.085501. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Wang JG, et al. How hot is a shear band in a metallic glass? Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2016;651:321–331. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.125. [Cross Ref]
38. Wang JG, et al. Ideal shear banding in metallic glass. Philos. Mag. 2016;96:3159–3176. doi: 10.1080/14786435.2016.1229063. [Cross Ref]
39. Ketov SV, Louzguine-Luzgin DV. Localized shear deformation and softening of bulk metallic glass: stress or temperature driven? Sci. Rep. 2013;3:2798. doi: 10.1038/srep02798. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Wright WJ, Samale MW, Hufnagel TC, LeBlanc MM, Florando JN. Studies of shear band velocity using spatially and temporally resolved measurements of strain during quasistatic compression of a bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater. 2009;57:4639–4648. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.013. [Cross Ref]
41. Slaughter, S. K. et al. Shear bands in metallic glasses are not necessarily hot. APL Mater. 2 (2014).
42. Ding J, Asta M, Ritchie RO. Anomalous structure-property relationships in metallic glasses through pressure-mediated glass formation. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:140204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.140204. [Cross Ref]
43. Zhang Q-D, Wang L-F, Zhao Y, Jiang Y, Zu F-Q. Remarkable improving plasticity of a brittle Zr-based bulk metallic glass by a high rheological rate forming method in centesimal seconds. Mater. Lett. 2016;164:348–352. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.11.017. [Cross Ref]
44. Steinhardt PJ, Nelson DR, Ronchetti M. Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses. Phys. Rev. B. 1983;28:784–805. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.784. [Cross Ref]
45. Ding J, Patinet S, Falk ML, Cheng Y, Ma E. Soft spots and their structural signature in a metallic glass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:14052–14056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412095111. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Cheng YQ, Ma E. Intrinsic shear strength of metallic glass. Acta Mater. 2011;59:1800–1807. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.046. [Cross Ref]
47. Yao KF, Ruan F, Yang YQ, Chen N. Superductile bulk metallic glass. App. Phys. Lett. 2006;88:122106. doi: 10.1063/1.2187516. [Cross Ref]
48. Yokoyama Y, Fujita K, Yavari AR, Inoue A. Malleable hypoeutectic Zr–Ni–Cu–Al bulk glassy alloys with tensile plastic elongation at room temperature. Philos. Mag. Lett. 2009;89:322–334. doi: 10.1080/09500830902873575. [Cross Ref]
49. Sergueeva AV, Mara NA, Kuntz JD, Lavernia EJ, Mukherjee AK. Shear band formation and ductility in bulk metallic glass. Philos. Mag. 2005;85:2671–2687. doi: 10.1080/14786430500154059. [Cross Ref]
50. Ramamurty U, Jana S, Kawamura Y, Chattopadhyay K. Hardness and plastic deformation in a bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater. 2005;53:705–717. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.023. [Cross Ref]
51. Zhang ZF, Eckert J, Schultz L. Difference in compressive and tensile fracture mechanisms of Zr59Cu20Al10Ni8Ti3 bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater. 2003;51:1167–1179. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00521-9. [Cross Ref]
52. Maaß R, Samwer K, Arnold W, Volkert CA. A single shear band in a metallic glass: Local core and wide soft zone. App. Phy. Lett. 2014;105:171902. doi: 10.1063/1.4900791. [Cross Ref]
53. Khonik VA. The kinetics of irreversible structural relaxation and rheological behavior of metallic glasses under quasi-static loading. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2001;296:147–157. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00915-2. [Cross Ref]
54. Schmidt V, Rosner H, Peterlechner M, Wilde G, Voyles PM. Quantitative Measurement of Density in a Shear Band of Metallic Glass Monitored Along its Propagation Direction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;115:035501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.035501. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Maaß R, Birckigt P, Borchers C, Samwer K, Volkert CA. Long range stress fields and cavitation along a shear band in a metallic glass: The local origin of fracture. Acta Mater. 2015;98:94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.062. [Cross Ref]
56. Cheng YQ, Ma E, Sheng HW. Atomic level structure in multicomponent bulk metallic glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;102:245501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.245501. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
57. Plimpton S. Fast Parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comp. Phys. 1995;117:1–19. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1995.1039. [Cross Ref]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group