|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
This is the first pharmacological characterisation of a neuropeptide G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) in a crustacean. We cloned the ORF of the red pigment-concentrating hormone from a German strain of Daphnia pulex (Dappu-RPCH), as well as that of the cognate receptor (Dappu-RPCHR). Dappu-RPCHR has the hallmarks of the rhodopsin superfamily of GPCRs, and is more similar to insect adipokinetic hormone (AKH) receptor sequences than to receptor sequences for AKH/corazonin-like peptide or corazonin. We provide experimental evidence that Dappu-RPCH specifically activates the receptor (EC50 value of 65 pM) in a mammalian cell-based bioluminescence assay. We further characterised the properties of the ligands for the Dappu-RPCHR by investigating the activities of a variety of naturally-occurring peptides (insect AKH and crustacean RPCH peptides). The insect AKHs had lower EC50 values than the crustacean RPCHs. In addition, we tested a series of Dappu-RPCH analogues, where one residue at a time is systematically replaced by an alanine to learn about the relative importance of the termini and side chains for activation. Mainly amino acids in positions 1 to 4 and 8 of Dappu-RPCH appear responsible for effective activation of Dappu-RPCHR. The substitution of Phe4 in Dappu-RPCH had the most damaging effect on its agonistic activity.
The common water flea Daphnia pulex (Class: Branchiopoda, Leydig 1860) is a planktonic filter-feeding crustacean that inhabits freshwater bodies. It forms an important part of the food chain and displays parthenogenetic reproduction under ideal environmental conditions1, 2. Daphnid crustaceans are model organisms in certain research fields, such as ecotoxicology, ecotoxigenomics and evolutionary ecology3–6. The entire genome of D. pulex is sequenced and represents the first crustacean genome available for data mining7, making it very interesting for comparative bioinformatic analyses, especially with a focus on peptide hormones8, 9. This class of hormones, specifically peptides originating from neuroendocrine centres, such as the X-organ – sinus gland complex, has been well-studied for decades in various infraorders of decapod crustaceans. Neuropeptide hormones play an important role in regulating all spheres of crustacean physiology (amongst others, development, metabolism, reproduction and growth). The physiological relevance of these neuropeptides could be examined with relative ease, but it was (and still is) difficult to make inroads into crustacean cell signalling where receptors for neuropeptide hormones are concerned10. Thus, the genome of D. pulex provides a window for comparative endocrinologists to look at crustacean peptide ligands and their receptors. The focus of the current paper is on one particular neuropeptide hormone signalling system in D. pulex, namely red pigment concentrating hormone (RPCH) and its cognate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR).
RPCH is an octapeptide named according to its first known function in decapod crustaceans, i.e. causing translocation of red, yellow and brown pigment granules to a central spot in the cytoplasm of chromatophores, resulting in a pale-looking cell. If these pigment cells are located in the integument, RPCH results in overall blanching (whitening) of the decapod11. Panbo-RPCH, which was isolated from the prawn, Pandalus borealis, is the first invertebrate neuropeptide that was ever fully characterised and sequenced12. Subsequently, identical RPCHs were sequenced from a variety of decapod crustaceans belonging to different infraorders13. From available transcriptomes and expressed sequence tag (EST) data available since the last decade, it has been possible to deduce the RPCH sequence in other crustacean orders, and some were found to differ from Panbo-RPCH14.
RPCH is structurally similar to an insect neuropeptide, the adipokinetic hormone (AKH), which is produced in cerebral neurohaemal organs called the corpora cardiaca, and which has an effect on intermediate metabolism in insects15. Meanwhile, it is established that peptides identical to Panbo-RPCH are also synthesised in several insect species belonging to the orders Hemiptera, Plecoptera and Coleoptera, and, in a few of these species, these were demonstrated to mobilise lipids14. In a number of insect taxa gene duplication has taken place, with up to five AKH isoforms being produced in one species16, whereas crustaceans only produce one RPCH per species14. The RPCH/AKH peptide family has characteristic sequence features: a chain length of 8 to 10 amino acids, a blocked N-terminus (pGlu), a blocked C-terminus (carboxyamide), at least two aromatic amino acid residues (mostly Phe4 or Tyr4, and Trp8), the ninth residue (when present) is always Gly13. Several structure-activity relationship studies have been conducted in insects to ascertain the importance of specific amino acid residues of AKH for functional activity and such studies have also been extended to in vitro assays with the expressed AKHRs14, 17–19. Since all RPCH peptides in decapods identified to date have the same sequence, it is assumed that the decapod RPCHR is fairly conservative when it comes to binding RPCH/AKH ligands. Indeed, this was borne out in an in vivo study with the shrimp, Palaemon pacificus, where we demonstrated that Dappu-RPCH could not affect pigment migration in a decapod crustacean, whereas it caused measurable biological activity in the green stink bug, Nezara viridula, which has an AKH with the same sequence as Panbo-RPCH11.
Two other peptides in arthropods have structural similarity to the RPCH/AKH peptides: corazonin (Crz) and AKH/corazonin-related peptide (ACP)20. The function of Crz varies in different insect species, while the function of ACP is still unknown20. In certain insect species all three peptides occur21. A fourth peptide structurally related to RPCH/AKH peptides is gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-like peptide. GnRH is a well-known master peptide in the reproductive cascade of vertebrates22. GnRH-like peptides (so named for their structural similarity) have been identified in several protostome groups21, 23. The giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii, possesses all four members of the so-called GnRH superfamily of peptides: RPCH, ACP, Crz and GnRH-like peptide24, 25.
AKHs exert their effects on cellular targets by binding to high affinity receptors, which are members of the superfamily of rhodopsin-like GPCRs and homologues of the vertebrate GnRH receptors18, 19, 26–28. Receptor sequences for RPCH in crustaceans may be deduced from genomic or transcriptomic information, based on sequence homology to other characterised receptors (notably the AKHR). A total of 85 GPCRs are predicted from in silico mining of the transcriptome of the spiny lobster, Sagmariasus verreauxi, one of which is considered an RPCH-like receptor29. Despite the paucity of information on crustacean RPCHR sequences, the RPCH signalling cascade has been investigated in several decapod crustacean species on a physiological and biochemical level30. From one such recent investigation with a G-protein antagonist, it was experimentally deduced that Panbo-RPCH lowers cAMP levels in ovarian chromatophores of the freshwater shrimp, Macrobrachium olfersi 31. In insects on the other hand, the AKHs seem to increase intracellular Ca2+ and cAMP levels32.
The aim of the current study is to demonstrate that Dappu-RPCH and the GPCR deduced from the genome (Dappu-RPCHR) is a signalling pair. This has not been done before for any crustacean peptide ligand and cognate receptor. Here, we clone Dappu-RPCH and Dappu-RPCHR to affirm the structures predicted from the water flea genome, and characterise Dappu-RPCHR in an expression assay in vitro. This study shows unequivocally that RPCH (and not ACP or corazonin) is the ligand of this receptor. Ligand-receptor assays were also carried out to ascertain which ligand parameters are important for agonistic activity with this crustacean receptor.
The whole genome of the cladoceran crustacean D. pulex was sequenced and annotated by 20117, 9. We searched the D. pulex genome database (wfleabase.org) with the genomic nucleotide scaffolds and the “Expressed Sequence Tag” (EST) selected in the “feature type” within the nBLAST program at wfleabase.org to identify an RPCH preprohormone. The predicted nucleotide sequence from the genome scaffold differed in size to the EST-derived sequence, with the former having a start codon further upstream from the EST start codon. A similar sequence with two putative start codons was also predicted from the genomic scaffold8, while a third prediction in NCBI database9 forecast a second methionine upstream from the EST start codon (Suppl. Fig. 1). Primers (Dpf and Dpr, Suppl. Table 1) were, thus, designed to first amplify the whole sequence of the EST-predicted RPCH preprohormone based on the genomic scaffolding sequence. This primer set amplified a 425bp DNA product from the German D. pulex ecotype cDNA (whole animal) and the sequence (Suppl. Fig. 2) was reconfirmed by PCR-amplification with a high-fidelity Taq polymerase. The 333bp open reading frame (ORF) of the amplified Dappu-RPCH encodes 110 amino acids: a short signal peptide (seven amino acid residues) and a long precursor-related peptide (83 amino acids) flank the Dappu-RPCH sequence with an amidation signal and dibasic cleavage site (Fig. 1; Suppl. Fig. 2). 5′ RACE PCRs were performed to amplify the predicted start codon(s) upstream of the start codon we had amplified, but all the attempts failed to amplify the extra amino acids. The 3′ sequence of the amplified ORF differs to all three predicted sequences, and three conservative amino acid substitutions are also noted in the translated precursor-related peptide (Suppl. Fig. 1). From the amplified ORF and from comparison with other members of the AKH/RPCH peptide family, it can be deduced that the mature Dappu-RPCH peptide has the following sequence: pQVNFSTSWamide (Fig. 1).
The D. pulex RPCH receptor was identified in the water flea genomic database (wfleabase.org) using an in silico search; five primers (Suppl. Table 1) were designed based on the genomic sequence, and the receptor cDNA was amplified via 5′ and 3′ RACE PCRs. The resulting RACE amplicons were sequenced and aligned to obtain a consensus sequence (Suppl. Fig. 3). RACE fragment sequences were verified in a nested PCR with a high-fidelity Taq polymerase to confirm the consensus sequence. The full length Dappu-RPCHR has an ORF of 1356bp that encodes a receptor protein of 451 amino acid residues (Fig. 2; Suppl. Fig. 3; GenBank acc. no. KY426816). In addition, we amplified a further 572bp that represents the 5′ untranslated region (UTR).
Seven membrane-spanning domains were predicted from the amplified Dappu-RPCHR sequence, with typical motifs that characterise the receptor as a rhodopsin-like GPCR (Fig. 2). The amplified translated Dappu-RPCHR protein sequence has high identity to Daphnia GPCR sequences that were obtained by conceptual translation from transcriptomes or genomes: 97% identity with a partial D. pulex “red pigment-concentrating hormone receptor” sequence (GenBank acc. no. ACD75498) and to the genome sequence (D. pulex GNO_748024; Suppl. Fig. 4), and 85% identity with a hypothetical GPCR 174 protein of D. magna (GenBank acc. no. KZS09902) and a “gonadotropin-releasing hormone II receptor” of D. magna (GenBank acc. no. JAN73548).
Alignment of the precursor genes shows that only the neuropeptide RPCH/AKH sequence is very well conserved with a degree of conservation further downstream (Fig. 1). Consequently, phylogenetic trees result in very low Bootstrap values from which true relationships cannot be deduced35. The alignment of Dappu-RPCHR with the characterised receptors of Bombyx mori for AKH, ACP and Crz reveal the highest conservation in the sequence from the first to the last transmembrane region, with especially high conservation of the transmembrane regions themselves (Fig. 2). Several of the amino acid residues are marked in Fig. 2 by a dot (•), these belong to the hallmarks of the rhodopsin-like GPCR superfamily; whereas the ones marked with an asterisk appear to be characteristic for the GnRH receptor subfamily. Many of these subfamily-specific residues are located in or close by the extracellular loops of the GPCRs and are possible candidates for being ligand binding residues35. A phylogenetic tree of the receptor sequences indicates that RPCHR is more closely related to AKHR than to the other members of the GnRHR subfamily (Fig. 3 and Suppl. Fig. 5).
There are four peptide signalling systems in arthropods that have structurally related receptors and ligands, viz. RPCH/AKH, Crz, ACP and GnRH-like peptides; only the former two are present in D. pulex 9. We tested the specificity of the cloned Dappu-RPCHR in a cell-based bioluminescent assay with the following synthetic peptides (see Table 1 for sequence information): Dappu-RPCH, the D. pulex corazonin (Dappu-Crz) and an insect ACP (Locmi-ACP), as well as an insect AKH family peptide (Placa-HrTH, a decapeptide hypertrehalosaemic hormone from the cicada, Platypleura capensis) and other crustacean RPCHs (Panbo- and Argsi-RPCH).
Dappu-Crz did not activate the receptor, while Locmi-ACP reached only 30% of the maximum activation at a high peptide concentration of 10µM (Fig. 4). Dappu-RPCH, on the other hand, clearly bound and activated the receptor with an EC50 value of 65 pM (Fig. 4, Table 1). These results indicate that the octapeptide Dappu-RPCH, is the endogenous ligand for the cloned GPCR, Dappu-RPCHR.
Other crustacean RPCHs were less effective at activating the water flea receptor than the endogenous ligand, Dappu-RPCH. Panbo-RPCH (the RPCH in decapod crustaceans) with three amino substitutions, Leu2, Pro6 and Gly7, had an EC50 value of 7.93nM, while Argsi-RPCH (the peptide from the brachyuran carp louse), with only one amino acid substitution (Lys7), showed a slightly lower efficacy with an EC50 value of 21.3nM (Fig. 4, Table 1).
We selected a number of AKH family octapeptides that are present in insect species and have one to three amino acid substitutions relative to Dappu-RPCH, particularly substitutions at positions 2, 6 and 7 (see Table 1 for structures) to try to understand the loss of potency demonstrated by the two crustacean RPCHs above. Figure 5 shows that the selected insect AKH peptides all activate the Dappu-RPCHR in a typical dose-related manner and are fairly potent in activating the receptor of the water flea, despite their amino acid substitutions: single amino acid substitutions, such as in Grybi-AKH (Ser7 to Gly7) of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, or Anaim-AKH (Thr6 to Pro6) of the dragonfly Anax imperator, had no effect or only a slight effect on activating the receptor (EC50 of 67 and 224 pM, respectively; Table 1). When a substitution was introduced in addition to Pro6, such as Leu2 (Corpu-AKH of the water boatman Corixa punctata), Asn7 (Peram-CAH-I of the cockroach Periplaneta americana) or Gly7 (Manto-CC of the heelwalker Order: Mantophasmatodea), the EC50 values were more or less the same as for Anaim-AKH (Table 1). Similarly, limited changes in efficacy (i.e. about 4 x less than Dappu-RPCH) were noted with Schgr-AKH-II (Leu2 and Gly7 of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria) and Nepci-AKH (Leu2, Ser6 and Gly7 of the water scorpion Nepa cinerea) (Table 1, Fig. 5).
We also tested the effect of an extended peptide chain length on activating Dappu-RPCHR by applying the decapeptide hypertrehalosaemic hormone (Placa-HrTH) to the receptor-expressing cells. Placa-HrTH is near-identical in sequence to Dappu-RPCH – it has the same sequence as Anaim-AKH but is extended C-terminally with G9N10amide (Table 1). The results indicate that the extended peptide chain length has an effect on activating Dappu-RPCHR. Figure 4 shows that this extension reduces the agonistic potential ca. 10-fold, as an EC50 value of 0.66nM was measured (Table 1).
To determine the relative importance of the eight amino acids making up the endogenous ligand Dappu-RPCH with respect to receptor activation, a series of synthetic Dappu-RPCH analogues was designed; each analogue had one amino acid substituted with a simple alanine residue (Table 2), and was tested in the cellular bioluminescence assay to activate the expressed Dappu-RPCHR. In this way we can explore the relative importance of each side chain and the blocked termini for activating the Dappu-RPCH receptor. A marked reduction of the EC50 values resulted when the N-terminal pGlu residue was replaced with a blocked Ala (N-acetyl Ala), or when the amidated C-terminus was replaced with a carboxyl group (free acid) (Table 2), thus demonstrating a 750-fold and 270-fold, respectively, lower affinity of these peptides for Dappu-RPCHR (Fig. 6A). Replacing Val2 with Ala2 had a similar effect as the unblocked C-terminal Dappu-RPCH analogue (Table 2; Fig. 6B). Changes at positions 3 (Asn to Ala), 4 (Phe to Ala) and 8 (Trp to Ala) all resulted in a very pronounced decrease in receptor activation (Fig. 6B), with EC50 values in the low micromolar range (Table 2). Substitutions of Ser5 with Ala, and especially Thr6 and Ser7 with Ala, were particularly well-tolerated by the receptor, and had only a relatively small effect on EC50 values (Table 2, Fig. 6B).
Several sequence predictions have been made for the preprohormone sequence of the red pigment-concentrating hormone in D. pulex (Dappu-RPCH) and it’s GPCR (Dappu-RPCHR). Here we report on sequences deduced from PCR amplification with several small differences as compared to the predicted ones, but with demonstrated functional activity.
The very short signal peptide of Dappu-RPCH amplified in the current study is unusual as AKH/RPCH signal peptides are around 20 amino acids long (Fig. 1). The sequence predicted from the genomic scaffold has a longer signal peptide but 5′ RACEs of the current study were not successful in amplifying the predicted 5′ end. This may possibly indicate a fault in the genomic data, e.g. misassembly of the read sequences, or perhaps poor quality of the RNA extracted from D. pulex specimens in the current study, although RNA was extracted from several batches of animals and the much longer receptor cDNA was also cloned from it. It is interesting, too, that a previous attempt to amplify the predicted Dappu-RPCH preprohormone by RT-PCR was unsuccessful9, and that an earlier in silico search of D. pulex ESTs reported that Dappu-RPCH could not be found36. Nonetheless, the RPCH preprohormone of D. pulex amplified in the current study is constructed in the same way as for other AKH/RPCHs, viz. a signal peptide, Dappu-RPCH, amidation and dibasic cleavage site, and finally a precursor-related peptide. The translated, mature Dappu-RPCH peptide has the following sequence: pQVNFSTSWamide. The presence of such a peptide in a United Kingdom D. pulex clone (strain Livpu01) was deduced from mass spectrometry as [M+H]+=950.44, although the mass ion was not fragmented to confirm the amino acid sequence and peptide identity9.
We also cloned a putative Dappu-RPCHR and as with Dappu-RPCH, there are several small sequence differences (Suppl. Fig. 4). However, since the cloned receptor is functional in vitro, we believe the amplified receptor is complete and that there may be a mistake in the assembled shotgun genomic sequence, or that the observed differences may be attributed to maternal clonal variation from which the starting material was derived. The amplified receptor shows the hallmarks of a rhodopsin-like GPCR and, when we look at an alignment of Dappu-RPCHR with three pharmacologically characterised receptors of the silk moth B. mori, viz. Bommo-AKHR, -CrzR and –ACPR (Fig. 2), the greatest resemblance is to Bommo-AKHR (46% identical and 66% similar residues), followed by Bommo-ACPR (42% identical and 64% similar residues). Bommo-CrzR shows least resemblance with 32% identical and 53% similar residues (Fig. 2). Bommo-AKHR and Dappu-RPCHR sequences were also aligned with the incomplete, predicted, putative RPCHR sequence from the spiny lobster S. verreauxi 29, as this is the only other crustacean putative RPCHR structure available for comparison (see Suppl. Fig. 5). From the overlap between all three sequences, it seems that the banchiopod crustacean receptor shares more identical amino acid residues with the insect AKHR than with the decapod crustacean’s putative RPCHR. Until we have more sequence information from characterised crustacean RPCHRs, this can only be a tentative interpretation.
In the phylogenetic tree of members of the GnRH receptor subfamily it is evident that Dappu-RPCHR falls within the cluster of AKH receptors, and that it is more closely related to ACP receptors than to Crz receptors (Fig. 3). To confirm that the cloned Dappu-RPCHR is only activated by RPCH/AKH and not the other members of the GnRH subfamily of peptides, a selection of peptides were presented to the expressed receptor in a cellular assay: it should be noted that ACP and a GnRH-like peptide have not been identified in D. pulex to date; nevertheless, we included an ACP from the migratory locust in this receptor validation experiment. The specificity of the receptor for RPCH/AKH was very clear: whereas endogenous Dappu-Crz could not activate the Dappu-RPCHR at all and Locmi-ACP was only slightly active at concentrations of 10µM, full activity with Dappu-RPCH was achieved by 0.1nM. This then characterises the cloned receptor as the first RPCH receptor that is subjected to detailed structure-activity investigations. Some insect receptors of the GnRH subfamily have been investigated extensively, such as from B. mori 34, Anopheles gambiae 20, 33 and Drosophila melanogaster 26, and have also been shown to be specific for either AKH, ACP or Crz. Apparently this ligand-specificity is shared in the crustacean Daphnia in as much as that its RPCH receptor is specific for only RPCH/AKHs, and Dappu-RPCH and its receptor form a tight and specific signalling system (Figs 4 and and5).5). Our data thus support the notion of receptor-ligand co-evolution resulting in independent signalling systems23, 35.
We have shown quite clearly for the Dappu-RPCH receptor in the present study which amino acid residues of the ligand are important for agonistic activity and also how important the blocked termini are. The latter are also considered important for prolonging the half-life of the AKH/RPCH peptides while circulating in the haemolymph of the insect or crustacean. In our in vitro studies, however, the enzymatic component and extended time to reach the receptor are no longer factors for consideration, yet Dappu-RPCH with the unblocked C-terminus shows severely reduced activity (270-fold) and the (N-acetyl Ala) substitution for pGlu1 results in an even more severely reduced EC50. Since there is limited opportunity for enzymatic degradation of the peptide, it is very likely that the observed reduction in agonistic potency is due to steric hindrance at the receptor, or a conformational change brought on by the altered terminus, or the negative charge introduced by the unblocked C-terminus, which may have resulted in a reduced affinity to the ligand-binding pocket of the receptor. Other important amino acid residues for activation of Dappu-RPCHR are similar to what has been identified in several insect studies17–19, viz. the aromatic amino acids: phenylalanine at position four and the tryptophan at position eight are crucial for binding to/activation of the receptor. Ala substitutions at positions two and five hampered receptor activation but not to the same severe extent as the Ala substitution at position three. These results are very similar to what was observed with modified D. melanogaster AKH and structure-activity relationship studies with the cognate AKHR18, and may be explained by the impeded secondary structure of AKH/RPCH that the substitutions bring about.
In contrast, Ala substitutions at positions five, six and seven of Dappu-RPCH were particularly well-tolerated by the receptor, and had only a small effect on EC50 values (Table 2; Fig. 6), hence, these residues are less important for binding the receptor. This is reflected to an extent by the activation of the Dappu-RPCH receptor by a variety of AKHs from insects and crustaceans (Table 1; Fig. 5). Amino acid substitutions at position 7 were tested: Gly7 and Asn7 for Ser7 had relatively little consequence, whereas Lys in position 7 (in the form of the crustacean peptide Argsi-RPCH) did not perform well in the receptor assay, and this is most likely due to the fact that lysine is a positively charged, bulky amino acid, which will severely disrupt the secondary structure of the peptide, as well as its intermolecular interactions with the receptor. The substitution of Thr in position 6 with Pro did not cause much of a disturbance in peptide interaction with Dappu-RPCHR, but in combination with Leu2 and Gly7 (Panbo-RPCH) a noticeable impact was made, which contrasted strongly with Manto-CC (Val2, Pro6, Gly7) (Table 1), and indicates the vulnerability of certain substitutions at position 2 of the AKH/RPCH peptides.
Clearly, the Dappu-RPCHR has “preferred” ligands as demonstrated in the current study, and Panbo-RPCH is not one of those (Table 1). In fact, the ligands that perform best in the current cell-based assay with Dappu-RPCHR are the ones that performed worst in a functional in vivo assay with the shrimp Palaemon pacificus that is responsive to Panbo-RPCH11. The current results are, thus, confirmation that the RPCH receptor in decapod crustaceans requires different sites on the ligand for binding and activation than do the AKH receptors in insects and the RPCH receptor in the branchiopod crustacean. It is thus, very interesting to see that Daphnia appears to be more closely related to the insects than to the higher crustacean order, the decapods29, 35.
Laboratory-reared adult D. pulex were kindly supplied by Dr Bettina Zeis (Zoology Department, University of Münster, Germany). This ecotype had originally been collected from streams and river beds in Gräfenhain, Sachsen, Germany. Whole animals were immersed in RNAlater® (Applied Bioscience – Ambion®) until use for the initial amplification of the RPCH precursor and its receptor.
The predicted RPCH preprohormone of D. pulex (Dappu-RPCH) and the predicted RPCH receptor (Dappu-RPCHR) were identified from nBLAST searches of the waterflea genomic database available at http://wfleabase.org. Primers (Suppl. Table 1) were designed based on these in silico identifications.
Total RNA was extracted from whole animals using Total RNA Isolation Reagent® (TRIR) (ABgene). Animals were briefly homogenized in 1ml TRIR reagent in Eppendorf tubes with a plastic pestle. Total RNA was resuspended in 0.1% DEPC (diethylpyrocarbonate) treated water and stored at −80°C. The resuspended RNA was treated with DNase (Fermentas), and thereafter, cDNA was synthesised using the SuperScript™ III First Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen).
For the amplification of Dappu-RPCH the primer set Dpf and Dpr was used. Amplification was achieved with MyTaq™ DNA Polymerase (Bioline) and the following PCR conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 2min followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 15s, 52°C for 30s (annealing) and 72°C for 10s (elongation), and a final elongation step of 72°C for 10min. PCR products were separated in a 2% agarose gel, excised and the DNA was extracted with the Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega Corporation). DNA amplicons were sub-cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector system (Promega Corporation). DH5α Escherichia coli cells were transformed with the recombinant vector according to instructions in the pGEM-T Easy vector manual. Plasmid DNA extraction was carried out with the BioSpin plasmid DNA extraction kit (Bioflux, Bioer Technology Co.) and sent for commercial sequencing using M13F and/or M13R primers (Macrogen, Korea). Sequence data were analyzed using the DNAMAN (Lynnon, Quebec, Canada) and BioEdit bioinformatic tools37. Homology searches were conducted using the Blast® programs, namely blastn, blastp and blastx from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
For the initial amplification of the RPCH receptor of D. pulex, primers were designed for use in 5′ and 3′ RACE PCRs with the Roche 5′/3′ RACE kit 2nd generation and RNA derived from animals in RNA-later.
For 3′ RACE PCR, cDNA was synthesised with the supplied oligo dT-anchor primer (Roche 8 adapter, R8, Roche). The cDNA was used in a nested PCR to amplify the 3′end in 50µl reactions using MyTaq DNA polymerase (Bioline): (i) firstly, with the gene-specific forward primer 1 (gspF1) and the anchor PCR Primer (R9, Roche), and employing the following thermal cycling conditions for amplification: initial denaturation at 95°C for 2min, 35 cycles of 95°C for 15s, 52°C annealing for 30s and 72°C for 10s; followed by a final elongation step of 72°C for 10min. The resulting PCR was cleaned with the Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega Corporation), diluted 1:20 with water and used as template DNA in the second PCR with the same cycling conditions as described in (i) above, but with the gene-specific forward primer 2 (gspF2) and the gene-specific reverse primer 1 (gspR1).
For 5′ RACE PCR, cDNA was synthesised using the SuperScript™ III First Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen) with a gene-specific reverse primer 1 (gspR1); the resulting cDNA solution was cleaned with the Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega Corporation), the cDNA was eluted in nuclease-free water and the terminal transferase reaction was carried out as instructed (5′ RACE kit protocol, Roche). The resulting dA-tailed cDNA was then amplified by nested PCR as follows in 50µl reactions using MyTaq DNA polymerase (Bioline): (i) with oligo-dT anchor primer R8 (Roche) and reverse primer 2 (gspR2), subjected to the following thermal cycling regime:- initial denaturation at 95°C for 2min, 10 cycles of 95°C for 15s, 52°C for 30s and 72°C for 40s; followed by 25 cycles of 95°C for 15s, 52°C for 30s and 72°C for 40s+20s/cycle, and a final elongation step of 72°C for 10min. (ii) 1µl of the above reaction, R9 primer (Roche) and reverse primer 3 (gspR3), were cycled as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 2min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 15s, 52°C for 30s and 72°C for 40s and a final elongation step of 72°C for 10min. PCRs were repeated with Expand Hi Fi taq polymerase (Roche).
Transmembrane regions of the amplified receptor were predicted by TM predictor in ExPASy Bioinformatics Resource Portal (Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics: www.expasy.org), while the signal peptide was predicted by SignalP 4.038, accessed via http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/.
For the cell screens, the full RPCHR sequence was amplified by a PCR reaction using a specific forward (5′-CACCATGTGTTCCAACGACAGCA-3′) primer with the ‘CACC’ Kozak sequence added to the 5′ side to facilitate translation in mammalian cells39 and reverse (5′-TTAAAATATATGTGTGACGACAGTTG-3′) primer. The PCR mixture was composed of 0.5µl Advantage II polymerase mix (Clontech), 5µl 10x Advantage PCR buffer (Clontech), 1µl dNTP mixture (10mM each), 1µl forward and reverse primers (10µM), 38.5µl water and 3µl cDNA. The amplification program consisted of an initial denaturation step of 95°C for 180s, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30s, 60°C for 60s, 68°C for 2min and a final elongation step of 68°C for 10min. The analysed and purified PCR product was subsequently cloned into a pcDNA3.1/V5-His-TOPO TA expression vector (Invitrogen) and sequenced using T7 and BGH primers (LGC Genomics). Bacteria containing the plasmids with the insert of the correct sequence and right orientation were transferred into 150ml LB medium with ampicillin (100µg/ml, Invitrogen) and grown overnight at 37°C in a shaking incubator. Subsequently the plasmid was isolated by means of EndoFree Plasmid Maxi Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) and once again the sequence was confirmed.
We compared the Dappu-RPCH sequence with other members of the AKH/ACP/Crz/GnRH family. The same was done for the receptor sequences. All analyses were performed with the MEGA software vers. 640. We aligned the amino acid sequences of a selection of AKH and RPCH precursor genes from insects and crustaceans. In addition, we aligned the amino acid sequences of the Dappu-RPCHR with three pharmacologically characterised receptors of the silk moth, Bombyx mori, viz. Bommo-AKHR, -CrzR and -ACPR. Alignments were performed by using MUSCLE (Multiple Sequence Comparison by Log- Expectation). Identical and similar residues were calculated with BLASTP. In addition, a phylogenetic tree of a selection of receptors was constructed after alignment with MUSCLE with the neighbour-joining method (1000-fold bootstrap resampling) using the Jones Taylor Thornton mutation data matrix.
Pharmacological analyses were performed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) WTA11 cells stably co-expressing the bioluminescent protein apoaequorin and the promiscuous Gα16 subunit, which couples most agonist-induced GPCRs to the phospholipase C and Ca2+ pathway, irrespective of their natural signalling cascade41.
CHO-WTA11 cells were cultured in monolayers in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium nutrient mixture F12-Ham (DMEM/F12) with L-glutamine, 15mM HEPES, sodium bicarbonate and phenol red (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100µg/ml streptomycin (Gibco), 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 250mg/ml zeocin (Gibco). All cells were maintained in an incubator at 37°C with a constant supply of 5% CO2.
Transfections with pcDNA3.1-Dappu-RPCHR or empty pcDNA3.1 vector were carried out in T75 flasks at 60–80% confluency. Transfection medium was prepared using the Lipofectamine LTX Kit (Invitrogen) with 2.5ml Opti-MEM® (Gibco), 12.5µl PlusTM Reagent and 5µg vector construct in 5ml polystyrene round-bottom tubes. After a 5min incubation period at room temperature, 30µl LTX was added to the medium. After a further incubation period of 30min at room temperature, the medium was removed and DNA/LTX mix was added dropwise to the cells followed by 3ml of fresh complete medium.
Following transfection, cells were incubated overnight (37°C, 5% CO2), then 10ml of cell medium was added followed by a second overnight incubation (37°C, 5% CO2). Ligand-induced changes in intracellular Ca2+ were then monitored in the cells as described below.
CHO-WTA11 cells transfected with receptor construct (or empty vector) plasmid were detached with PBS, complemented with 0.2% EDTA (pH 8.0), and rinsed off the flask with DMEM/F12 with L-glutamine and 15mM HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich). The number of viable and nonviable cells was determined using a TC20 automated Cell Counter (BIO-RAD). The cells were pelleted for 5minutes at 800rpm and resuspended to a density of 5.106 cells/ml in sterile filtered bovine serum albumin (BSA) medium (DMEM/F12 with L-glutamine and 15mM Hepes, supplemented with 0.1% BSA) and loaded with 5µM Coelenterazine_h (Invitrogen) for 4h in the dark, at room temperature, while gently shaking to reconstitute the holo-enzyme aequorin. After a 10-fold dilution, cell solution (50µl) was delivered to each well in a 96-well plate (~25000 cells/well) and cells were exposed to potential ligands reconstituted in BSA medium and distributed across the plate. In every row, BSA medium alone was placed in one well to serve as the negative control (blank). The Ca2+ response was recorded for 30s on a Mithras LB 940 (Berthold Technologies). After 30s, 0.1% Triton X-100, a non-ionic surfactant, was added to the same well to measure the total cellular Ca2+ response. The total response (ligand+Triton X-100), which is directly related to the number of cells present in the well, was used to normalise the response. The response of each negative control was subtracted from the luminescence obtained for wells within the same row. Calculations were made using the output file from the Microwin software (Berthold Technologies) in Excel (Microsoft). Further analysis was done in GraphPad Prism 5.
Peptides were custom-synthesized either by Dr Kevin D. Clark (Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, USA), or were purchased from Peninsula Laboratories (Belmont, CA, USA), from Pepmic Co., Ltd. (Suzhou, China), or Synpeptide Co. (Shanghai, China). For primary structures see Tables 1 and and22.
The peptides were dissolved in 80% acetonitrile and purified with reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). The bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method was applied to determine the concentrations of RP-HPLC-purified peptides42. The purity of RP-HPLC fractions was verified with a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem time-of-flight (MALDI TOF/TOF, Ultraflex II Bruker Daltonics) mass spectrometer.
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).
The authors would like to thank Mr Lance Anders (Department of Biological Sciences, UCT) for technical assistance on the cloning project and Dr Bettina Zeis (Zoology Department, University of Münster, Germany) for kindly supplying D. pulex. We would like to thank Prof. Marc Parmentier (Free University of Brussels, Belgium) and Prof. Michel Detheux (Euroscreen S.A., Belgium) for providing CHO-WTA11 cells, as well as Dr Elisabeth Marchal for her support in cell culture experiments. The study would not have been possible without financial support by the National Research Foundation (NRF, Pretoria, South Africa; grant number IFR2011033100049 to HGM and grant number 85768 [IFR13020116790] to GG), the University of Cape Town (block grants to HGM and GG), the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO postdoctoral research fellowship to HV), the KU Leuven Research Foundation (GOA/11/002 and C14/15/050) and the Interuniversity Attraction Poles (IAP) programme (Belgian Science Policy Grant P7/40).
H.G.M. and G.G. co-designed the study. H.G.M. supervised the work in Cape Town and performed the initial cloning of the peptide precursor and its receptor. H.V. made the expression construct and performed the cell screens. Analysis of the results and writing of the manuscript was performed by H.G.M. and H.V. G.G. contributed to analysis of the S.A.R. results and commented on drafts of the manuscript. J.V. supervised the work in Leuven and commented on the manuscript. All authors approved the submitted version of the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Heather G. Marco and Heleen Verlinden contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06805-9
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.