PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
 
Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 6928.
Published online 2017 July 31. doi:  10.1038/s41598-017-07093-z
PMCID: PMC5537238

Epauletted fruit bats display exceptionally high infections with a Hepatocystis species complex in South Sudan

Abstract

Hepatocystis parasites are closely related to mammalian Plasmodium species, the causative agents of malaria. Despite the close phylogenetic relationship, Hepatocystis parasites lack the intermittent erythrocytic replication cycles, the signature and exclusive cause of malaria-related morbidity and mortality. Hepatocystis population expansion in the mammalian host is thought to be restricted to the pre-erythrocytic liver phase. Complete differentiation of first generation blood stages into sexual stages for subsequent vector transmission indicates alternative parasite/host co-evolution. In this study, we identified a region of exceptionally high prevalence of Hepatocystis infections in Old World fruit bats in South Sudan. Investigations over the course of five consecutive surveys revealed an average of 93 percent prevalence in four genera of African epauletted fruit bats. We observed a clear seasonal pattern and tolerance of high parasite loads in these bats. Phylogenetic analyses revealed several cryptic Hepatocystis parasite species and, in contrast to mammalian Plasmodium parasites, neither host specificity nor strong geographical patterns were evident. Together, our study provides evidence for Pan-African distribution and local high endemicity of a Hepatocystis species complex in Pteropodidae.

Introduction

Parasites of the mammal-infecting haemosporidian parasite genus Hepatocystis are closely related to mammalian Plasmodium species13. Hepatocystis parasites are largely confined to arboreal mammals of the Old World tropics, and they are common in and described from Old world monkeys, fruit bats and squirrels4. The chevrotain (Hyemoschus)5 and Hippopotamus amphibius 6 represent less well-known hosts. The genus Hepatocystis currently contains up to 25 known species, but many species descriptions lack independent confirmation7, 8.

The first reports of Hepatocystis parasites in bats date back to 1926, when Rodhain described, what he thought to be a species of Plasmodium, Plasmodium epomophori from different African pteropid bats9. The species was later reclassified as species of Hepatocystis after Garnham (1950)10 described the asexual liver stages of Hepatocystis epomophori and found them to resemble Hepatocystis kochi from primates. All reported bat hosts to date belong to the closely related bat families Pteropodidae and Hipposideridae of the suborder Yinpterochiroptera.

The Hepatocystis life cycle differs from that of its closest relatives, mammalian Plasmodium species8, in several life cycle stages. In the vertebrate host, the presence of macroscopic exoerythrocytic schizonts, so-called merocysts, is the most prominent feature of Hepatocystis. Merocysts are formed in the liver and, similar to Plasmodium parasites, generate thousands of daughter cells (merozoites), but they appear to be the only replication phase in the vertebrate host. After release into the blood stream, merozoites invade erythrocytes and directly develop into sexual stages (gametocytes). Thus, contrary to Plasmodium species, Hepatocystis parasites appear to lack the asexual erythrocytic replication cycles. Accordingly, infections likely do not result in the characteristic malaria signs that are associated with this specific parasite life cycle step. It is important to note that an early report described irregular schizonts in the blood of bats9. However, this observation was questioned by Garnham (1953)11, who failed to confirm similar signatures of asexual replication in Hepatocystis infections and commented that these “blood-stage schizonts” were more likely fragments of the large liver merocysts.

Hepatocystis infections are generally described as benign, although some complications, such as anaemia and scarring of the liver, have been discussed4. The notion of fitness costs by Hepatocystis infections is strongly supported by the identification of apparent selection of resistance alleles in the promoter region of the Duffy blood group antigen/chemokine receptor DARC in Hepatocystis kochi-infected yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus)12. Few studies of the pathogenicity of Hepatocystis infections in bat hosts have been conducted, however.

The arthropod vector of Hepatocystis also differs fundamentally from mammalian Plasmodium parasites, which are exclusively transmitted by anopheline mosquitoes. After many unsuccessful attempts to find the vector of Hepatocystis in a wide range of candidate arthropods13, 14, Culicoides adersi (Ceratopogonidae, Diptera) was eventually confirmed as the vector for the primate-infecting species Hepatocystis kochi 13, 15. Sporogony of Hepatocystis parasites is unusual since ookinetes encyst in the head and thorax between muscle fibres of Culicoides (rather than on the midgut wall, as in Plasmodium), but after mature oocysts rupture and release sporozoites, they migrate to the salivary glands similar to Plasmodium transmission4. Vector incrimination still awaits confirmation for the remaining Hepatocystis species.

In this study we present a systematic serial survey of Hepatocystis infections in sympatric fruit bats of the Republic of South Sudan. Bats were investigated in repeated surveys from 2010 to 2015 in both the wet and the dry season. The systematic characterization of prevalence, parasitaemia and phylogenetic relationships of Hepatocystis infections reveal previously unrecognized insights into this neglected mammalian haemosporidian genus.

Results

Prevalence

A total of 393 bats belonging to eight families and 18 chiropteran genera from five consecutive surveys in South Sudan (2010–2013, 2015) were investigated (Table S1). Hepatocystis parasites were verified in 172 individuals, corresponding to an overall prevalence of 44%. Individuals of four out of five examined pteropid genera, namely the epauletted fruit bats Epomophorus, Epomops, Hypsignathus, and Micropteropus harboured Hepatocystis parasites. The two investigated individuals of the fifth investigated pteropid bat genus Rousettus (lanosus) were Hepatocystis-negative. One individual out of 23 of the genus Hipposideros (Hipposideridae) harboured a very low infection of Hepatocystis. Together, infected bats were confined to the two families Hipposideridae and Pteropodidae (Table 1, Fig. 1A). Subpatent infections were recorded for 15% (n = 25) of the positive samples (detection in the PCR screening only, Table S2, Fig. S1). Notably, bats with these subpatent infections were almost exclusively sampled during the dry season.

Table 1
Prevalence in Pteropodidae and Hipposideridae.
Figure 1
Parasitological parameters of Hepatocystis infections. (A) Prevalence of parasite infections in hipposiderid and pteropid host genera in percent (total numbers of infected individuals are listed below). (B) Parasitemia levels did not differ significantly ...

Among the epauletted hosts, consistently very high prevalences of Hepatocystis infections were verified across the different years, ranging from 89% up to 100% (Table 1, Fig. 1A). In the most representative sample size of Epomophorus hosts investigated across all years (n = 138), the lowest prevalence of 89% (33/37), was documented in 2015, when bats were sampled during the dry season. The mean prevalence in Epomophorus across all years was 94% (133/138) (Table 1). A similar high prevalence (89%) was detected for Micropteropus (n = 35). Moreover, most individuals of Epomops (9/10) and the one investigated Hypsignathus individual featured infections with Hepatocystis. Members of the families Nycteridae and Rhinolophidae featured infections with Nycteria parasites16.

Parasitemia

For bats with confirmed Hepatocystis infections, parasitaemia values (% of infected erythrocytes) were calculated. In pteropid bat hosts, parasitaemias ranged from 0.1% to 0.4% (Table 2). As expected for cross-sectional survey, the parasitaemia range varied considerably, with minimum parasitaemia levels below the microscopic detection limit (<0.001%) and extremely high maximum parasitaemias of up to 4.7% in some individuals. Parasitemia in the single individual of Hipposideros was below 0.001%. Parasitemia levels did not differ significantly between the three host genera of epauletted bats that made up the bulk of our samples, Epomophorus, Epomops and Micropteropus (Chi-square = 0.945, df = 2, p = 0.624) (Fig. 1B), suggesting that all three genera are similarly susceptible to Hepatocystis infections.

Table 2
Parasitemia of Hepatocystis infections – host genera.

For the epauletted species, within each sex, there were no significant differences in parasitaemia levels between adults and juveniles (females: t = 0.216, df = 110, p = 0.829; males: t = 0.018, df = 38, p = 0.985; Table 3), thus age classes were pooled for subsequent comparisons. Overall, females had significantly higher parasitaemia levels than males (females: n = 112, mean = 0.45% ± 0.89%; males: n = 40, mean = 0.21% ± 0.49%; t = −2.053, df = 125.3, p = 0.042).

Table 3
Parasitemia values in different sex and age groups.

For both sexes, parasitaemia was higher in samples collected in the wet season (May-October) than in the dry (January) (Fig. 1C, Table 3), but this difference was only significant for females (females: dry season – n = 15, mean = 0.04% ± 0.03%; wet season – n = 97, mean = 0.51% ± 0.94%; t = −4.94, df = 97, p < 0.0005; males: dry season – n = 10, mean = 0.07% ± 0.07%; wet season – n = 30, mean = 0.26% ± 0.55%; t = −1.10, df = 38, p = 0.278). Highest mean parasitaemias of 0.84% ( ± 1.25) as well as highest maximum parasitaemia of 4.66% were noted in bats from 2012 that were sampled in late July in Western Equatoria State (Table 4). The lowest mean parasitaemias of 0.05% ( ± 0.05) were detected in January (2015) in the dry season, followed by samples from May, at the onset of the wet season. The very high levels of parasitaemia found in some females during the rainy season were not related to pregnancy. In fact, parasitaemia was lower in pregnant females during the wet season, although not significantly (pregnant females: n = 5, mean = 0.11% ± 0.15%; non pregnant females – n = 92, mean = 0.53% ± 0.96%; t = 0.976, df = 95, p = 0.332). The majority of pregnant females captured were from the dry season, when parasitaemia was universally low.

Table 4
Parasitemia of Hepatocystis infections across sampling seasons.

Morphology of parasite blood stages

The only parasites visible in the blood of Hepatocystis-infected animals are gametocyte stages4. The morphology of early and mature gametocyte stages detected in this study largely corresponds to the description of Hepatocystis epomophori 4, 9. The youngest parasites are small ring-shaped forms with a solid nucleus and double-infections of the erythrocytes are common. The development of a vacuole in the ring forms is apparent and sometimes the nucleus splits into two or more granules (Fig. 1D A–B). The hemozoin is only visible once the vacuole starts disappearing. The pigment is fine-grained and the colour ranges from light green to dark brown (Fig. 1D C–D). Mature macro- and microgametocytes are distinguishable by the colour of the cytoplasm after Giemsa staining. Macrogametocytes (Fig. 1D H–J) appear as bright blue whereas the microgametocytes (Fig. 1D F–H) exhibit a biscuit-coloured cytoplasm and a rose-coloured area around the nucleus, which is free of pigment. In the majority of the infections seen in the current study, blood stages were limited to mature gametocytes. Approximately 8% of the infections exhibited both young and mature stages in the blood simultaneously; all were sampled during the wet season when parasitaemias were high.

Unusual Hepatocystis blood stages

Three individuals of Epomophorus sp. (DMR630, DMR631, DMR634), sampled during the wet season, featured blood stages that differed from the preceding descriptions and instead resembled Rodhain’s9 notes on the early blood stages that he thought to be erythrocytic schizont stages. At the early stage, blood stages are annular or ovoid shaped and exhibit a peripheral nucleus (Fig. S2A). Additionally, we observed a separation of the nucleus in two or three parts that seemed to be isolated from each other and only connected by the parasite’s cytoplasm. These forms were sometimes difficult to distinguish from multiple infections of a single erythrocyte by several early stages (Fig. S2B–E). Mid-adult stages tend to have an amoeboid shape (Fig. S2C,D,K,L). The cytoplasm stains pale blue and contains one or more chromatic masses and can be present in dense forms and also in small compact blocks, rounded or elongated, arranged in linear or irregular clusters that give the parasite a characteristic appearance (Fig. S2A,E–O). We also observed some parasites that were apparently in the process of division (e.g. Fig. S2I). Rodhain noted multiple forms of division in “irregular schizonts” that were quite numerous in two samples and he further indicated a division into six up to twelve blocks. In conclusion, in three out of 172 infections, which displayed high parasitaemia, blood stages that display features of asexual replication were detected, indicative of an alternative, but rare, Hepatocystis expansion phase in host erythrocytes. It cannot, however, be ruled out that these blood stages present the onset of the process of exflagellation of microgametocytes, artificially initiated during preparation of the blood smears.

Phylogenetic diversity of infections and generalism among African fruit bat hosts

Phylogenetic analyses were performed to assess the phylogenetic diversity, and possible geographic and/or host-specificity patterns of Hepatocystis parasites from the Republic of South Sudan. Representative infections were chosen from each host genus as well as from both sampling areas, Central Equatoria State and Western Equatoria State. In addition, published sequences of Hepatocystis parasites from other African (West Africa: Guinea, Liberia; East Africa: Uganda, Kenya, Mozambique) and Asian countries were included, comprising parasites from both primate and bat hosts (Supplemental Table S3; Figs 2 and and33).

Figure 2
Three-genome phylogeny for Hepatocystis parasites in the context of the mammalian haemosporidian parasite clades. The concatenated phylogenies were obtained via analysis of four genes, the mitochondrial cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase 1, the apicoplast ...
Figure 3
Molecular phylogeny of African bat Hepatocystis parasites (section of Fig. 2). (A) Hepatocystis sequences are color-coded by the seven different bat host genera (blue = Epomophorus, black = Nanonycteris, brown = ...

Maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses confirmed Hepatocystis as a monophyletic clade with high support (posterior probability of 1, bootstrap value of 100) (Fig. 2). Both analysis recovered the clades of Plasmodium (Plasmodium), Plasmodium (Vinckeia), Plasmodium (Laverania), Nycteria and Polychromophilus as monophyletic clades and relationships among the species within the clades show identical topologies (with slight differences in the Vinckeia clade). Bayesian analysis groups Hepatocystis as sister clade to the mammalian Plasmodium clade, which has been reported by Lutz (2016)17 (Fig. 2A). However, the maximum likelihood analysis resulted in a sister relationship of Hepatocystis with the Plasmodium ovale/vivax clade, as shown before2 (Fig. 2B).

The Hepatocystis clade itself is comprised of two main subclades. The first includes all parasites of primates, which forms a monophyletic clade, consisting of Asian as well as African primate hosts, with the latter presenting a monophyletic subgroup (Fig. 2, highlighted in grey). The second main group within the Hepatocystis clade contains all African chiropteran Hepatocystis parasites. Surprisingly the parasites of the Asian flying fox species Pteropus hypomelanus, samples in Malaysia18, and of Hipposideros larvatus from Cambodia19 cluster basal to the ‘primate’ Hepatocystis clade and not with the other chiropteran Hepatocystis parasites (Fig. 2). Furthermore, within the second, “African bat” clade, an Asian fruit bat (Cynopterus brachyotis from Singapore3) was host to the most basal parasite sequence (Fig. 2). The analysis indicates two transition events of Hepatocystis parasites from Asian bat hosts, one into (Asian and African) primates and another single introduction into African bats.

Within the African fruit bat Hepatocystis clade, parasite sequences do not cluster in specific clades, but represent several close related taxa or cryptic species (Fig. 3A,B). The whole clade contains parasite sequences from all six fruit bat host genera, Epomophorus, Epomops, Micropteropus, Hypsignathus, Nanonycteris and Myonycteris (highlighted with different colours in Fig. 3A), which are mixed throughout the tree. Thus, no structuring is apparent to indicate strict host specificity (Fig. 3A). Strikingly, even the parasite sequence of the second bat host family Hipposideridae does not group outside, but falls well within the clade of sequences of the African pteropid hosts.

The analysis included sequences from different countries and locations in both West Africa (Guinea, Liberia, and Ivory Coast) and Central-/East Africa (South Sudan, Uganda, Kenya), presenting considerably distant sampling areas (Fig. 3B). Hepatocystis from South Sudan fall in several different places across the tree, each enclosing parasites of different hosts, showing no pattern of clustering according to sampling sites within the country (Western Equatoria State (WES) and Central Equatoria State (CES)). Again, sequences of parasites of all different countries are mixed throughout the tree and the lack of structuring indicates no strict geographic patterns (Fig. 3B).

In summary, parasites from different host genera group closely together as well as do parasite lineages from very distant localities in West and East Africa, underlining that Hepatocystis is a generalist among the African epauletted fruit bats.

Discussion

In the current study, we report previously unrecognized high prevalences of Hepatocystis infections in African epauletted fruit bats throughout different months and seasons in host individuals of both sexes and all ages. This finding could either point to chronic infections of Hepatocystis or to a high rate of new infections in one individual on a regular basis throughout the year. The majority of Hepatocystis-infected bats exhibited only mature gametocytes in the blood at the time of sampling, but some individual bats that were captured in the peak of the wet season featured early and mature gametocyte stages in the blood simultaneously. In combination with higher mean parasitaemias of bats that were captured during the wet season, these observations indicate that Hepatocystis-infections feature a seasonal pattern, which is consistent with earlier tentative observations4 and most likely correlates with the life history of the invertebrate vector. Nonetheless, the extremely high rate of infections in African epauletted fruit bats is striking and points to highly efficient transmission cycles.

The maximum parasitaemia levels in Hepatocystis infections of over 4% gametocyte stages inside erythrocytes would represent hyperparasitemia in human Plasmodium infections. Such a parasitaemia level might be tolerable in the bats since the infected red blood cells do not burst due to the lack of blood schizogony and repeated infection cycles, one critical parameter for malaria-related anaemia. However, whether high parasitaemia, which in the case of Hepatocystis equals high gametocytemia, impacts the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood in these hosts and thereby, results in reduced host fitness remains to be analysed. Indeed, the first study tackling the issue of potential fitness costs of Hepatocystis infections revealed the evolution of a malaria resistance gene in baboons (Papio cynocephalus)12.

Parasites of the genus Hepatocystis have been recognized in fruit bats since 1908, first in Australian and Asian Pteropus species11 and later in several African fruit bats20, 21. These first notes only contained the description of gametocyte stages in the peripheral blood. Some years later, Rodhain reported the presence of schizonts in the blood of fruit bats, which lacked pigment and exhibited an irregular form with 8 to 10 blocks of chromatin, but he did not observe mature schizont stages in the blood9. In his review of bat malaria parasites, Manwell mentioned Rodhain’s finding and did not exclude the possibility that erythrocytic schizonts exist in Hepatocystis parasites22. In fact, he reported “segmenters” in the blood smears of the Hepatocystis-infected Australian flying fox Pteropus (alecto) gouldii 22. Manwell pointed out that these “segmenters” were extracellular and lacked hemozoin pigment at this stage, but stated that the finding of segmenting forms in the peripheral blood were the most remarkable results of his study22. The “unusual blood stages” that were documented in the current study occurred in three individuals only and should, therefore, not be dismissed, but also not be overinterpreted. Garnham (1966)4 argued that the blood stages, which were reported by Rodhain9 and Manwell22 represented microgametocytes that had undergone rapid development during the time interval of fixation and drying the blood smear. He reasoned that a delay in drying the material lets to the division of the nucleus of the microgametocyte prior to exflagellation. Even though all samples of the current study were prepared in the same manner, the authors cannot rule out that ambient humidity or a slight delay in preparation created conditions that might have been suitable for exflagellation to start (in three samples) and therefore would have to be considered artifacts. Certainly, future studies, including transcriptional profiling of Hepatocystis-infected erythrocytes and systematic organ sampling, are needed to gain a better understanding of a potential flexibility of Hepatocystis life cycle progression in the mammalian host. Whether the process of erythrocytic schizogony in the parasite life cycle has been gained or lost independently multiple times within haemosporidian parasites still represents one of the most important unresolved questions.

The taxonomic status and the phylogenetic placement of Hepatocystis among haemosporidian taxa has been highly unstable throughout the years. The first molecular studies that included cytb-sequences of Hepatocystis 1, 2 both recovered a paraphyletic status of the mammalian Plasmodium clade; with the Hepatocystis sequences nested within the Plasmodium (Plasmodium) and Plasmodium (Vinckeia) species. This relationship was subsequently supported by a three-genome phylogeny of haemosporidian parasites3. Even though the phylogenetic classification of Hepatocystis within the mammalian Plasmodium clade has been verified from several subsequent studies23, 24, the exact phylogenetic placement among the mammalian Plasmodium species still remains uncertain. In the majority of analyses Hepatocystis groups as sister clade to the primate Plasmodium clade containing e.g. P. ovale and P. knowlesi 2, 23, 25, 26. In other studies, however, Hepatocystis falls as sister to a clade comprising bat/rodent and primate Plasmodium species24, or as sister clade to a monophyletic clade that contains all mammalian Plasmodium species17. The current study could not resolve the exact placement of Hepatocystis, but underscores once again its close relationship with mammalian Plasmodium species, despite the striking differences in their respective life cycle strategies.

Species of Hepatocystis are described from the four mammalian host orders Cetartiodactyla, Primates, Rodentia and Chiroptera, but the majority of species has been described from the latter host group (10 out of 23 Hepatocystis species8). The main difficulty in recovering the phylogenetic relationships of Hepatocystis parasites is the heterogeneity of available sequences and the sampling bias within the different mammalian host groups. Until today, the majority of sequences comprise partial sequences of the cytochrome b gene only. Furthermore, no phylogenetic studies have been published for parasite species from artiodactyl and rodent hosts yet (except that some rodent Hepatocystis sequences have been published in GenBank). Considering only primate and bat Hepatocystis parasites, this study revealed specificity on the taxonomic level of mammalian host order, but not on host genus level, a very unusual attribute for parasites, which typically display clear signatures of close parasite/host associations and co-evolution. Different genera of bats contained Hepatocystis sequences that are nearly identical and only differ by a few bases. Phylogenetic studies of African epauletted fruit bats have confirmed most of the chiropteran morpho-genera and -species. However, recent studies found the genus Epomophorus to be paraphyletic due to the inclusion of the genus Micropteropus, but this remains to be confirmed by future studies27, 28. This, combined with the fact that Epomophorus and Micropteropus species often roost in the same trees, may explain how similar haplotypes of Hepatocystis are found in these two closely related bat taxa. However, similar Hepatocystis sequences are also found in phylogenetically more distant related genera such as Hypsignathus and Myonycteris that clearly group outside the Micropteropus/Epomophorus complex. Most strikingly, even the bat genus Hipposideros, which belongs to an entirely different bat family and does not share ecological preferences exhibits similar Hepatocystis sequences. Further analysis of parasites from Asian and also Australian bat hosts will be needed to explain the close relationship to the primate or the African bat Hepatocystis clade and to further investigate the degree of host specificity. Nonetheless, it is already apparent that a taxonomic revision of the whole Hepatocystis/mammalian Plasmodium group is required.

Infections were limited to the bat families, Pteropodidae and Hipposideridae (Suborder Yinpterochiroptera), the only two (out of 21) chiropteran families known to harbour Hepatocystis parasites8. We wish to highlight that this also applies to the chiropteran Plasmodium species, which again have only been described from pteropid and hipposiderid hosts. However, in contrast to Hepatocystis, the species of Plasmodium are each restricted to one distinct host species. The current study revealed several cryptic species of parasites, which, based on blood stage morphology, all belong to the species Hepatocystis epomophori 4 and lack signatures of host specificity. Similarly, our phylogenetic analysis did not recover clear strong geographical patterns of chiropteran Hepatocystis parasites. Some structure into East African versus West African Hepatocystis sequences can be observed, but in other cases, closely related parasite lineages are found on both sides of the African continent. For instance, some Hepatocystis sequences recovered from the bat species Micropteropus pusillus in Guinea are more closely related to parasites from individuals of the bat genus Epomophorus from South Sudan as to parasites from Guinean Epomophorus or South Sudanese Micropteropus. The low divergences that were recovered in the phylogenetic analysis indicate that these parasites are moving back and forth amongst the different host genera regularly. This broad host and geographical distribution might also imply that Hepatocystis epomophori can infect previously unrecognized host genera.

Four distinct Hepatocystis species have been formally described from African bat hosts9, 2931. However, the African chiropteran Hepatocystis lineages appear to represent a species complex of taxa that are morphologically and phylogenetically closely related. It is tempting to speculate that Hepatocystis parasites were more successful in chiropteran hosts over the course of evolution than species of Plasmodium. This hypothesis could explain the constrictive host spectrum and high specificity of Plasmodium in bats on the one hand, where only two Plasmodium species each specific to one bat species, and apparently restricted to West Africa have been identified thus far and the wide host spectrum of at least ten host species throughout tropical Africa, but unspecific character of Hepatocystis parasites on the other hand. However, it should also be noted at this point that Hepatocystis parasites are apparently universal in epauletted fruit bats and close related taxa (comprising Myonycteris as well as the epauletted host genera Micropteropus, Epomophorus, Epomops, Nanonycteris, Hypsignathus), but no infections have been reported from the African fruit bat genera Megaloglossus, Plerotes and Rousettus yet, which present the most closely related bat taxa28. The two samples of Rousettus (Stenonycteris) lanosus in this study also did not harbour Hepatocystis parasites. Probably differences in the life history of bat species co-determine the exposure to potential invertebrate vectors and the susceptibility to Hepatocystis parasites, e.g. species of Rousettus are cave-dependent, whereas epauletted fruit bat species feature roosting sites in the foliage of trees. Further molecular and statistical analysis of Hepatocystis infections from different countries and hosts will be needed to test for possible host and geographical patterns in more depth.

The systematic survey of Hepatocystis parasites in the South Sudanese epauletted fruit bats across different years and seasons revealed consistently high parasite prevalences in a family of bats (Pteropodidae) that has been associated with diverse viruses32. In this context, parasite infections may affect the health of their hosts and thus might influence the response to viral infections. Pteropid bats often roost in close proximity to humans and individuals with high parasite loads might then pose a potential risk of zoonotic virus transmission. On the other hand, Hepatocystis infections might represent a form of commensalism with low or no impact on their vertebrate hosts and future studies are needed to determine the physiological consequences for the hosts. Despite being a close relative of mammalian Plasmodium, parasites of the genus Hepatocystis have so far been rather neglected in studies of malaria parasites. This study illustrates that Hepatocystis research might contribute to a better understanding of the evolution and to new insights into the biology of the whole parasite group.

Material and Methods

Ethics statement

All surveys were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Bucknell University (Pennsylvania, USA) and the South Sudanese Ministry for Wildlife Conservation and Tourism. All work was performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations regarding care and use of animals.

Field sampling

Bats were sampled during five consecutive studies on mammalian biodiversity, conservation and disease ecology in southern regions of the Republic of South Sudan between 2010 and 201533, 34. The surveys covered different habitat types. The region in the former Central Equatoria State on the southern border with Uganda, comprises a mix of subtropical and moist savannah, whereas the research areas further west (in the former Western Equatoria State; state names currently in flux), bordering the Democratic Republic of Congo, encompassed the tropical zone of South Sudan. Bats were captured with mist-nets and several keys were used for bat identifications3539. Standard measurements were recorded for every bat to verify morphological field identification. Blood samples were collected as blood dots on filter paper or FTA cards. Thin blood smears were prepared on glass slides and fixed in 100% methanol. All bats were deposited as voucher specimens in the mammal collection of the National Museum of Natural History in Washington D.C. (NMNH) (catalogue numbers listed in Table S2) and bat species identification was confirmed by further morphological comparisons of skins, skulls, and palatal ridges. Amy T. Gilbert and her team provided a subset of pteropid bat samples collected in Kenya in 2009.

Parasitemia

Giemsa-stained thin blood smears were examined at 1,000x with bright-field microscope and immersion oil. The mean number of erythrocytes per field was determined by counting two random fields, and the number of parasites was recorded in 20 to 30 fields, choosing fields of comparable erythrocyte density. Parasitemia was calculated as the percentage of erythrocytes infected with Hepatocystis parasites.

Planned comparisons were made to assess the effects of taxon, age, sex, season, and reproductive condition on parasitaemias. Due to our inability to achieve normality and homogeneity of variance in our overall dataset, a Kruskal-Wallis test was used to explore differences between the three genera of bats from which we had adequate samples. Age, sex, seasonal differences and the influence of pregnancy were assessed with t-tests where values were corrected for unequal variances when necessary. Samples from a total of 152 bats in the host genera Epomophorus, Epomops and Micropteropus were included in the final analysis.

Molecular methods

The QIAGEN DNeasy extraction kit (Hilden, Germany) was used for DNA isolation from the dried blood dots on filter paper and from FTA cards (GE Healthcare). The protocol for animal tissues was performed with the minor modification of elution of the samples in 50 μl AE buffer. PCR was performed using the QIAGEN TopTaq Master Mix with 2–3 μl of genomic DNA as the template, and 1 μl of each primer (10 mM). Four genes from the three parasite genomes were targeted for subsequent phylogenetic analysis: the mitochondrial genes cytochrome b (cytb) and cytochrome oxidase 1 (cox1); the apicoplast caseinolytic protease gene (clpc); and the nuclear gene elongation factor 2 (EF2). Primers are listed in Table S4. All PCR products were sequenced with the amplification primers in both directions using BigDye v3.0 (Applied Biosystems) and run on an ABI-373 sequencer. Parasite sequences included 906 nucleotides (nt) of the cytb, 951 nt of cox1, 564 nt of clpc and 567 nt of the ef2-gene (Table S5).

Screening for Hepatocystis

All Giemsa-stained thin blood smears were screened with the microscope for a minimum of six minutes per slide. DNA was isolated for all pteropid and hipposiderid samples and tested by PCR using the primer set Hep-F3/Hep-R323, which was designed for chiropteran Hepatocystis (targeting a 506 bp sequence of cytochrome b). PCR negative samples (in the cytb-screen) were subsequently screened via PCR targeting the clpc- and/or the ef2-gene to confidently exclude false-negatives.

Phylogenetic analyses

The gene sequences revealed genetically mixed infections (different haplotypes) in many samples, visible as double nucleotide peaks in the sequence electropherograms, which is also common in Hepatocystis infections of primates40. For the subsequent phylogenetic analysis, any sample with a high number of double nucleotide peaks was excluded and double peaks in the sequences that were chosen for analyses were treated as ambiguous sequences and coded as N’s (IUPAC nucleotide code for “any base”). Sequences were assembled and aligned in Geneious 8.1.9 using MUSCLE41. Corresponding sequence data from representatives of the major haemosporidian groups were included in the phylogenetic analysis (Table S3). Phylogenetic relationships were evaluated by using Bayesian inference and maximum-likelihood (ML) methods. Data were divided into partitions according to genes and PartitionFinder v.2 42 was used to test different DNA substitution models and partition schemes. Twelve data blocks defining first, second and third codon positions of the four protein-coding genes were determined for the concatenated alignment and best partition schemes and models were used for the phylogenetic analyses (summarized in Table S5 and Table S6). RaxmlGUI v.1.3 43 was used for the ML analysis with concatenated alignments and nodal support was evaluated using 500 thorough bootstrap pseudoreplicates44. Bayesian inference was conducted in MrBayes v3.2.6 45, 46 via the CIPRES Science Gateway Web Portal V3.347 with two runs of four chains (three heated, one cold, temperature = 0.10) each for 20 million generations. For each independent partition a GTR + I + Γ type model was used and reversible rate matrices, partition-specific rate multipliers and stationary state frequencies had a Dirichlet prior. The α and proportion of invariant sites had uniform priors. A prior of all topologies equally likely was used for τ and the prior on branch lengths was set as unconstrained exponential (parameter 10). The first 25% of trees were discarded as burn-in. Mixing and convergence of runs, and effective sample size (ESS > 200) were assessed in the program Tracer v1.6 48. Runs were combined using LogCombiner v1.8.2, and the maximum clade credibility tree was summarized with TreeAnnotator v.1.8.2. Phylogenetic trees were visualized in FigTree (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/fgtree/).

Electronic supplementary material

Acknowledgements

The Max Planck Society supported this work. Funding for the South Sudan surveys was provided by The National Geographic Society, The Eppley Foundation, the Woodtiger Fund, and Bucknell University. We thank Matthew Rice and Adrian Garside of Fauna & Flora International (FFI), who provided significant assistance with field logistics in South Sudan; Laura Grieneisen, Sarah Brownlee-Bouboulis, and Laura Kurpiers from Bucknell University, Hassan Babiker Salata from Juba University, South Sudan, and Esther Langan, and Darrin Lunde from the US National Museum of Natural History (NMNH), Smithsonian Institution, for field assistance in South Sudan. We thank Ivan Kuzmin, Michael Niezgoda, Wanda Markotter and Bernard Agwanda along with Amy Gilbert and Kevin J. Olival for the sample collection of the Kenyan bats.

Author Contributions

Author Contributions

J.S., S.L.P., K.M. and D.M.R. designed the study. D.M.R. organized (and participated in) all surveys in the Republic of South Sudan (2010–2015) and oversaw the collection and preparation of blood smears and DNA samples. J.S. (2012), I.E. (2010–2015) and M.E.V. (2011–2012) participated in surveys and collected samples in South Sudan. J.S. conducted microscopic and molecular analyses. J.S. and S.L.P. conducted the phylogenetic analyses. D.M.R. and J.S. conducted the statistical analyses. The manuscript was written by J.S., S.L.P., K.M. and D.M.R. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Notes

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07093-z

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

1. Escalante AA, Freeland D, Collins WE, Lal A. The evolution of primate malaria parasites based on the gene encoding cytochrome b from the linear mitochondrial genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:8124–8129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8124. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Perkins SL, Schall J. A molecular phylogeny of malarial parasites recovered from cytochrome b gene sequences. J. Parasitol. 2002;88:972–978. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2002)088[0972:AMPOMP]2.0.CO;2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Martinsen ES, Perkins SL, Schall J. A three-genome phylogeny of malaria parasites (Plasmodium and closely related genera): evolution of life-history traits and host switches. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008;47:261–273. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.012. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Garnham, P. C. C. Malaria parasites and other Haemosporidia. (Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1966).
5. Garnham PCC, Edeson JF. Two new malaria parasites of the Malayan mousedeer. Riv. Malariol. 1962;41:1–8. [PubMed]
6. Garnham PCC. A malaria parasite of the hippopotamus. J. Protozool. 1958;5:149–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1958.tb02543.x. [Cross Ref]
7. Levine, N. The protozoan phylum Apicomplexa. (CRC Press, 1988).
8. Perkins SL, Schaer J. A modern menagerie of mammalian malaria. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32:772–782. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2016.06.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Rodhain J. Plasmodium epomophori n. sp. parasite commun des Roussettes epaulieres au Congo Belge. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. Filiales. 1926;19:828–838.
10. Garnham PCC. Exoerythrocytic schizogony in bat malaria. Nature. 1950;166:155. doi: 10.1038/166155b0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Garnham PCC. Types of bat malaria. Riv. Malariol. 1953;32:149–154. [PubMed]
12. Tung J, et al. Evolution of a malaria resistance gene in wild primates. Nature. 2009;460:388–391. [PubMed]
13. Garnham, P. C. C., Heisch, R. B. & Minter, D. M. The vector of Hepatocystis (=Plasmodium) kochi; The successful conclusion of observations in many parts of tropical Africa. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 497–502 (1961b). [PubMed]
14. Garnham PCC. Trees, ticks and monkeys: further attempts to discover the invertebrate host of Hepatocystis kochi. Z. Tropenmed. Parasitol. 1957;8:91–96. [PubMed]
15. Garnham PCC, Heisch RB, Minter DM, Phipps JD, Ikata M. Culicoides adersi Ingram and Macfie, 1923, a presumed vector of Hepatocystis (=Plasmodium) kochi (Laveran, 1899) Nature. 1961;190:739–741. doi: 10.1038/190739b0. [Cross Ref]
16. Schaer J, et al. Nycteria parasites of Afrotropical insectivorous bats. Int. J. Parasitol. 2015;45:375–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2015.01.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Lutz HL, et al. Diverse sampling of East African haemosporidians reveals chiropteran origin of malaria parasites in primates and rodents. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2016;99:7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.03.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Olival KJ, Stiner EO, Perkins SL. Detection of Hepatocystis sp. in southeast Asian flying foxes (Pteropodidae) using microscopic and molecular methods. J. Parasitol. 2007;93:1538–1540. doi: 10.1645/GE-1208.1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Duval L, et al. Multiple host-switching of Haemosporidia parasites in bats. Malar. J. 2007;6:157. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-6-157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Rodhain, J. Quelques hematozoaires de petits mammiferes de l′Uele (Quelle), Congo Belge. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. 1–5 (1915).
21. Leger M. Sur un Plasmodium de la Roussette du Haut-Senegal et Niger. C. r. séances Soc. biol. ses. fil. 1914;2:399–401.
22. Manwell RD. Bat malaria. Am. J. Hyg. 1946;43:1–12. [PubMed]
23. Schaer J, et al. High diversity of West African bat malaria parasites and a tight link with rodent Plasmodium taxa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:17415–17419. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311016110. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Borner J, et al. Phylogeny of haemosporidian blood parasites revealed by a multi-gene approach. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2015;94:221–231. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.09.003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Outlaw DC, Ricklefs RE. Rerooting the evolutionary tree of malaria parasites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:13183–13187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109153108. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Martinsen ES. Hidden in plain sight: Cryptic and endemic malaria parasites in North American white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Sci. Adv. 2016;2:e1501486. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501486. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Nesi N, Nakouné E, Cruaud C, Hassanin A. DNA barcoding of African fruit bats (Mammalia, Pteropodidae). The mitochondrial genome does not provide a reliable discrimination between Epomophorus gambianus and Micropteropus pusillus. C. R. Biol. 2011;334:544–554. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2011.05.003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Almeida FC, Giannini NP, Simmons NB. The evolutionary history of the African fruit bats (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) Acta Chiropterol. 2016;18:73–90. doi: 10.3161/15081109ACC2016.18.1.003. [Cross Ref]
29. Landau II, Adam JP. Description de schizontes de rechute chez un nouvel Haemoproteidae, Hepatocystis perronae n. sp. parasite de Megachiroptères africains. Cahier ORSTOM, Ser Entomol. méd. et Parasitol. 1971;9:373–378.
30. Miltgen F, Landau I, Rosin G, Erard C. [Hepatocystis brosseti n. sp. Haemoproteidae, parasite of Epomops franqueti, Pteropinae, in Gabon] Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 1977;52:589–596. doi: 10.1051/parasite/1977526589. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Miltgen F, Landau I, Bradbury J. [Hepatocystis of Hypsignathus monstrosus (Pteropinae) in Gabon. II. Description of Hepatocystis carpenteri n. sp (author’s transl)] Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 1980;55:485–490. doi: 10.1051/parasite/1980555485. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Leroy EM, et al. Fruit bats as reservoirs of Ebola virus. Nature. 2005;438:575–576. doi: 10.1038/438575a. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Reeder DM, Helgen KM, Vodzak ME, Lunde DP, Ejotre I. A new genus for a rare African vespertilionid bat: insights from South Sudan. Zookeys. 2013;285:89–115. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.285.4892. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Albariño CG, et al. Novel paramyxovirus found associated with severe acute febrile disease in a wildlife biologist returning from South Sudan and Uganda. E.I.D. 2014;20:211–216. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Rosevear, D. R. The bats of West Africa. (Trustees of the British Museum Natural History, 1965).
36. Meester, J. & Setzer, H. W. The mammals of Africa: An identification manual. (eds Meester, J. & Setzer, H. W.) (Smithsonian Institution Press, 1971).
37. Koopman KF. Bats of the Sudan. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1975;154:355–443.
38. Csorba, G., Ujhelyi, P. & Thomas, N. Horseshoe bats of the world (Alana Books, 2003).
39. Kingdon, J. et al. Mammals of Africa, Volume IV. (eds Happold, M. & Happold, D.) (A & C Black Publishers Ltd., 2013).
40. Thurber MI, et al. Co-infection and cross-species transmission of divergent Hepatocystis lineages in a wild African primate community. Int. J. Parasitol. 2013;43:613–619. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.03.002. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Kainer D, Mayer C, Stamatakis A. Selecting optimal partitioning schemes for phylogenomic datasets. BMC Evol. Biol. 2014;14:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Silvestro D, Michalak I. RaxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Org. Divers. Evol. 2012;12:335–337. doi: 10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0. [Cross Ref]
44. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst. Biol. 2008;57:758–771. doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:754–755. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Ronquist F, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012;61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov 2010, New Orleans, LA, pp. 1–8 (2010).
48. Rambaut, A., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D. & Drummond, A. J. Tracer v1.6, http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer (2014).

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group