Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of mjafiGuide for AuthorsAbout this journalExplore this journalMedical Journal, Armed Forces India
Med J Armed Forces India. 2000 July; 56(3): 235–236.
Published online 2017 June 10. doi:  10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30176-4
PMCID: PMC5532108


Case Report

A 14-year-old boy was brought by his parents with history of absent penis since birth. Family history was negative for congenital or familial diseases. He had been voiding through the anus and was continent. Examination revealed normally built boy with an absent penis, well-developed scrotum with bilateral normally descended testes (Fig-1). On per rectal examination the urinary meatus was felt as a dimple just within the anal verge. No other systemic anomalies were detected.

Fig. 1
Clinical photograph showing absence of penis, well developed scortum with normally descended testes.

Investigations revealed a 46 XY karyotype, buccal smear negative for chromatin and normal renal function. The excretory urogram (IVU) showed bilateral normally functioning kidneys, normal ureters and bladder. Voiding cystogram revealed normal bladder, no reflux and drainage of contrast from the urethra into the rectum (Fig-2). The patient was advised gender reassignment or staged phallic reconstruction to overcome psychosociological embarrassment but he did not agree to either. Psychological evaluation revealed being well adjusted with his disability.

Fig. 2
Post IVU voiding cystogram lateral view showing contrast in urinary bladder (B) and rectum (R)


Penile agenesis, albeit an exceedingly rare disorder with an occurrence estimated at 1 in 10 million births [1], about 70 cases have been reported in neonates. In most cases the diagnosis is not in question. Although the genetic sex in majority of aphallic patients is 46 XY and fertility theoretically may be possible, these patients should be raised as girls [2]. The poor psychological outcome in patients who were raised as boys strongly reinforces this concept. The surgical difficulties and poor result encountered in phallic reconstruction have prompted female sex assignment [3]. Early sex reassignment in the neonatal period is ideal as gender awareness begins around 18 months after birth and is well-established in most children by the time they are 2.5 years old. Gender reassignment at adolescence is fraught with significant social and psycho-pathological trauma and may not be agreed to by the patients as in our case.

In addition, sex reassignment in the neonatal period with early orchidectomy may have the advantage of preventing the postnatal testosterone surge and central nervous system testosterone imprinting which are important to subsequent gender identity [3].


1. Elder JS. Congenital anomalies of the genitalia. Campbell’s Urology. 1998:2126–2127.
2. Gautier T, Sahient J, Pena S, Imperato MC, Ginley J, Peterson RE. Testicular function in 2 cases of penile agenesis. J Urol. 1981;126:556–559. [PubMed]
3. Oesch IL, Pinter A, Ransley PC. Penile agenesis. A report of six cases. J Paediatr Surg. 1987;22:172–175. [PubMed]

Articles from Medical Journal, Armed Forces India are provided here courtesy of Elsevier