Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 6527.
Published online 2017 July 26. doi:  10.1038/s41598-017-06994-3
PMCID: PMC5529374

Elevated CO2 and nitrogen addition have minimal influence on the rhizospheric effects of Bothriochloa ischaemum


The influence of elevated CO2 and nitrogen (N) addition on soil microbial communities and the rhizospheric effects of Bothriochloa ischaemum were investigated. A pot-cultivation experiment was conducted in climate-controlled chambers under two levels of CO2 (400 and 800 μmol mol−1) and three levels of N addition (0, 2.5, and 5 g N m−2 y−1). Soil samples (rhizospheric and bulk soil) were collected for the assessment of soil organic carbon (SOC), total N (TN), total phosphorus (TP), basal respiration (BR), and phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) 106 days after treatments were conducted. Elevated CO2 significantly increased total and fungal PLFAs in the rhizosphere when combined with N addition, and N addition significantly increased BR in the rhizosphere and total, bacterial, fungal, Gram-positive (G+), and Gram-negative (G) PLFAs in both rhizospheric and bulk soil. BR and total, bacterial, G+, and G+/G PLFAs were significantly higher in rhizospheric than bulk soil, but neither elevated CO2 nor N addition affected the positive rhizospheric effects on bacterial, G+, or G+/G PLFAs. N addition had a greater effect on soil microbial communities than elevated CO2, and elevated CO2 and N addition had minor contributions to the changes in the magnitude of the rhizospheric effects in B. ischaemum.


Changes in global climate such as elevated CO2 concentrations, nitrogen (N) deposition, drought, and warming will have dramatic impacts on biological nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems1. Soil microbial communities, especially rhizospheric microorganisms, serve as bridges between plants and soil, are key drivers of the global bio-geochemical cycles of mineral elements2. Much attention, however, has been given to characterize the responses of these communities to various scenarios of climate change35, but the responses of the communities to elevated CO2 and N deposition are poorly understood.

The individual effects of either elevated CO2 or N addition on soil microbial communities have been widely studied6, 7. CO2 concentrations are generally much higher in the pore spaces of soil (2000–3800 μmol mol−1) than in the atmosphere, so elevated CO2 usually influences the richness, composition, and structure of the communities indirectly, such as by increasing plant carbon (C) inputs to the soil and altering soil properties7. Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis indicated that CO2 enrichment had no detectable effects on the composition and structure of the community812, but usually stimulated soil respiration11, 13. Analyses of functional genes indicated that elevated CO2 decreased the expression of genes involved in the C and N cycles14, 15, but Liu et al.16 reported that elevated CO2 increased the abundance of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria in a Chinese paddy field. These contradicting results might be due to the duration of CO2 enrichment7, the soil15, or the vegetation type17, 18.

N deposition can increase the concentrations of NH4 +-N and NO3 --N in soil and improve the amount and quality of substrates available to soil microorganisms and thereby increase soil microbial biomass and activity19. Zhou et al.20 and Ma et al.21 reported that N additions increased the abundances of the microbial functional groups involved in the soil N cycle. N deposition, however, can also significantly decrease soil pH and thus dramatically decrease microbial biomass and the diversity of soil microbial communities2224. The effects of N addition on these communities depended significantly on the amount added. Low or moderate N addition usually increases microbial biomass and diversity, but excessive N addition decreases them25, 26.

CO2 concentrations and N deposition have both increased under global climate change27. Elevated CO2 combined with N deposition increases litter decomposition, improves the supply of C to the soil ecosystem, and lessens soil N limitation, thereby substantially increasing C and N cycling in soil ecosystems28, 29. Soil respiration can also increase significantly under combined elevated CO2 and N addition30, more than for either alone31. Haase et al.32 found that neither elevated CO2 nor N supply affected the abundance of total and denitrifying bacteria in rhizospheric soil. Lee et al.28 recently reported that elevated CO2 and N addition affected bacterial and archaeal communities but not the fungal community. The effects of elevated CO2 and N addition on microbial communities vary with plant type28.

Processes in the rhizosphere mediate many important aspects of plant-soil interactions33. The activity and diversity of soil microbial organisms are generally higher in rhizosphere than bulk soil34. The release of low-molecular-weight organic compounds can change the biomass and composition of microbial communities, thus leading to further changes in rhizospheric microbial communities. Rhizodeposition is the main driver of rhizospheric effects35, defined as the ratios of the values of a variable in the rhizosphere and bulk soil; a positive (negative) rhizospheric effect indicates that a variable was higher (lower) in the rhizosphere than the bulk soil. Factors that regulate rhizospheric nutrient fluxes may control the magnitude of rhizospheric effects4, 36. A comprehensive understanding of the responses of soil microbial communities to elevated CO2 combined with N addition and exploring the changes of rhizospheric effects are important for understanding biogeochemical processes in terrestrial ecosystems in scenarios of global climate change.

Bothriochloa ischaemum (L.) Keng is a perennial herbaceous grass that is widespread in the hilly-gully regions of the Loess Plateau of China. It is characterized by quick reproduction and drought and trampling resistance and is a high-quality natural forage for livestock in this semiarid region. Its root system is well developed and forms a network that has a notable effect in preventing soil and water erosion. The soil of the plateau has low levels of total N37. The current rate of N deposition in this area is 2.2 g N m−2 y−1 38, 39 and is expected to increase in the future40. Elevated global levels of CO2 and N deposition would synergistically lead to changes in the nutrient cycles in this temperate area. Elevated CO2 and N addition can significantly increase the photosynthesis of B. ischaemum and mitigate the N deficiency on the plateau41, 42. The response of soil microbial communities, especially rhizospheric microorganisms, to combined elevated CO2 and N addition, however, has rarely been studied. The purpose of the present study was to determine the response of soil respiration and microbial communities in the rhizosphere and bulk soil to an elevated CO2 level in combination with N addition. We hypothesized that (1) N addition would have a larger impact on community composition than elevated CO2 in the soil of this N-poor area, and (2) The effects of B. ischaemum rhizospheres on microbial-community variables should increase in the elevated-CO2 and N-addition treatments due to increased rhizodeposition.


Soil TOC, TN, and TP contents

A two-way ANOVA showed that elevated CO2 did not have significant effect on SOC or TN content in either the rhizosphere or bulk soil, and N addition did not have significant effect on SOC, TN, or TP content (Table 1). Elevated CO2 and N addition did not have interactive effect on SOC, TN, or TP content. Elevated CO2 significantly affected TP content in both the rhizosphere and bulk soil (P < 0.05). TP content tended to decrease in response to elevated CO2 (Table 2).

Table 1
P values for the effects of elevated CO2 (C), N addition (N), and their interaction on chemical and microbial properties in the rhizosphere and bulk soil.
Table 2
Soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) contents (g kg−1) in the rhizosphere and bulk soil in the treatments.

Microbial respiration

Elevated CO2 did not have significant effect on basal respiration (BR) or substrate-induced respiration (SIR) in the rhizosphere or bulk soil (Table 1). N addition significantly increased BR in the rhizosphere (P < 0.001). BR for the rhizosphere was 74.7 and 101.2% higher in N2 than N0 at ambient and elevated CO2, respectively (Fig. 1). BR was significantly higher in the rhizosphere than the bulk soil in all six treatments, and this positive rhizospheric effect was significantly affected by N addition (P < 0.001; Table 3, Fig. 2a). SIR was similar in the rhizosphere and bulk soil, indicating no rhizospheric effect (Figs 1b and and2b2b).

Figure 1
BR (a) and SIR (b) in the rhizosphere and bulk soil in the treatments. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments in the rhizosphere. AN0, ambient CO2 and no N added; AN1 ambient CO2 and N supply at a rate of 2.5 g N ...
Table 3
P values for the effects of elevated CO2 (C), N addition (N), and their interaction on rhizospheric effects.
Figure 2
Rhizospheric effects for BR (a) and SIR (b) in the treatments. *Above each bar indicates significant difference between the rhizosphere and bulk soil. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in rhizospheric effects between treatments. ...

CLPP analysis

A two-way ANOVA indicated that neither elevated CO2 nor N addition had significant effect on AWCD, H, or D (Table 1). Elevated CO2 and N addition did not have interactive effect on the functional diversity of the soil microbial communities in either the rhizosphere or the bulk soil (Table 4).

Table 4
Average well color development (AWCD) and functional diversity (Shannon index (H), and Simpson index (D)) of the soil microbial communities in the treatments in the rhizosphere and bulk soil.

PLFA analysis

A two-way ANOVA indicated that elevated CO2 had significant effect on total and fungal PLFAs in the rhizosphere (Table 1). Compared with AN2, EN2 significantly increased total PLFA in the rhizospheric soil, and fungal PLFA was significantly higher in EN1 than AN1 in the rhizospheric soil (Fig. 3). N addition significantly increased total, bacterial, fungal, G+, and G PLFAs in both the rhizosphere and bulk soil (Table 1, Fig. 3). A principal component analysis of the PLFA data indicated that the first two components, PC1 and PC2, accounted for 81.44 and 1.71% of the variance, respectively (Fig. 4). The PLFA patterns differed significantly between the rhizosphere and bulk soil along PC1. Elevated CO2 and N addition did not have significant interactive effect on the composition of microbial PLFAs (Table 1).

Figure 3
Total PLFA (a), bacterial PLFA (b), fungal PLFA (c), G+ PLFA (d), G PLFA (e), fungal/bacterial PLFA (f), and G+/G PLFA (g) in the rhizosphere and bulk soil in the treatments. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences ...
Figure 4
Principal component (PC) analysis of the PLFAs in the rhizosphere and bulk soil in the treatments. R, rhizospheric soil; B, bulk soil; AN0, ambient CO2 and no N added; AN1 ambient CO2 and N supply at a rate of 2.5 g N m−2 y−1 ...

Total, bacterial, G+, and G+/G PLFAs were significantly higher in the rhizosphere than bulk soil (Fig. 5). The positive rhizospheric effect (variables were higher in the rhizosphere than the bulk soil) for total PLFA was significantly increased only by elevated CO2 (Table 3). The positive rhizospheric effects for bacterial, G+, and G+/G PLFAs were not affected by either elevated CO2 or N addition.

Figure 5
Rhizospheric effects for total PLFA (a), bacterial PLFA (b), fungal PLFA (c), G+ PLFA (d), G PLFA (e), fungal/bacterial PLFA (f), and G+/G PLFA (g) in the treatments. *Above each bar indicates significant difference between the rhizosphere ...


Characteristics of the soil microbial communities under elevated CO2 and N addition

Soil respiration is an important part of the global C cycle and the largest component of C flux from terrestrial ecosystems to the atmosphere43, 44. Elevated CO2 and N deposition can have profound impacts on soil respiration30. A meta-analysis found that N addition significantly increased soil respiration by 7.84% in grasslands45. N addition in our study significantly increased BR in the rhizosphere. This result was consistent with those by Luo et al.46 and Zhang et al.47, who found that N application significantly increased soil respiration, which they attributed to N-induced increases in plant growth, especially root biomass. We also found that N addition significantly increased root biomass (Table 5). Soil respiration is generally sensitive to elevated CO2 48. Baronti et al.13 and Liu et al.49 observed increased soil respiration under elevated CO2. A meta-analysis by De Graaff et al.50 found that soil respiration increased by 17.1% under elevated CO2 and suggested that these increases could be due to microbial responses from changes in substrate availability. Elevated CO2 in our study did not have significant impact on BR in either the rhizosphere or bulk soil, suggesting that 106 days elevated CO2 might not significantly increase substrate availability to the community, although elevated CO2 significantly increased root biomass (Table 5).

Table 5
Effects of elevated CO2 concentration (C) and N addition (N) on plant biomass and nitrogen content.

The response of the soil microbial community to elevated CO2 and N deposition depends on many factors, such as plant species, soil temperature and water content, and especially nutrient availability23, 51. Previous studies have reported that elevated CO2 or N addition increased, decreased, or had no significant impact on community structure7, 15, 16, 26, 28, 52. These contradictory results could be due to differences of microbial substrate availability under different scenarios of climate change. Elevated CO2 usually indirectly affects microbial communities by altering root biomass and exudation. Elevated CO2 for 106 days in our study significantly increased plant biomass, and elevated CO2 and N addition had significant interactive effect on plant root biomass, so total and fungal PLFAs significantly increased in the rhizosphere in the treatments with both elevated CO2 and N addition. N addition directly increased soil N content and may have indirectly improved nutrient availability by changing the conditions of plant growth (Table 5). The effects of N enrichment on the communities are associated with soil critical N loads or N saturation theories53. These theories propose that the effect of N enrichment on ecosystem functions would switch from stimulation to inhibition when the ecosystem reaches a critical N loading or saturation level23, 54, 55. The N-saturation theories suggest that low N additions usually increase soil microbial biomass and microbial diversity and that high N addition would decrease them25, 26. Plant growth on the Loess Plateau is restricted by soil N content, and N addition in our study significantly increased soil microbial biomass and shifted the community structure.

Rhizospheric effects under elevated CO2 and N addition

Rhizospheres are zones of higher microbial turnover and activity, because they are adjacent to plant roots56. Many important aspects of plant-soil interactions are mediated by rhizospheric processes, including nutrient acquisition and root colonization by rhizospheric microorganisms. Microbial activity is higher and more diverse in rhizospheres than bulk soil33. We also found that BR and total, bacterial, G+, and G+/G PLFAs were significantly higher in the rhizosphere than bulk soil. The higher G+/G PLFAs in the rhizosphere than the bulk soil indicated that the rhizosphere communities were more heterotrophic via increases in C inputs when the plants were exposed to elevated CO2 and N addition57, 58.

Rhizospheric effects can be affected by elevated CO2 and N addition36, 59. The types and amounts of organic root exudates can be altered when plants are exposed to high levels of CO2, and these changes may affect rhizospheric microbial activity and community composition. Lee et al.4 reported that rhizospheric microbes responded to elevated CO2 more strongly than the microbes in bulk soil. Our results showed that elevated CO2 significantly increased the rhizospheric effects of total PLFA, as expected, because rhizospheric microbial communities are sensitive to elevated CO2. The rhizospheric effects of other microbial variables (such as bacterial PLFA, G+ PLFA, and G PLFA), however, responded weakly to elevated CO2. The impact of N addition on rhizospheric effects can be affected by many factors, such as plant species, soil type, soil chemical properties, and the amount and duration of N addition35. Phillips and Fahey60 found that N fertilization had a positive, negative, or no impact on rhizospheric effects for trees, depending on the tree species and soil variables. Ai et al.61 reported that long-term inorganic N addition reduced rhizospheric effects in a wheat-maize rotation system. N addition in our study did not significantly affect the rhizospheric effects for the soil variables, except BR, consistent with the results by Zhu et al.36, who also reported that N fertilization had minimal influence on the rhizospheric effects of two grass species. N is the limiting factor for plant growth on the Loess Plateau, and N addition in our study significantly increased plant total biomass and root biomass, so the root-derived C inputs to the soil (e.g. root exudates) may have been significantly affected by the N addition, and the available substrates in the rhizosphere (e.g. NH4 +, NO3 ) may also have been significantly absorbed by the plants (Table 5), which may account for the lack of significant shifts in the rhizospheric effects34, 62.

Evaluating the effects of elevated CO2 and N deposition on soil microorganisms in the rhizosphere and bulk soil is challenging because of their high diversity. Our PLFA analysis found that elevated CO2 and N addition had significant effects on the soil microbial community, especially in the rhizospheric soil. Both elevated CO2 and N addition contributed little to the changes in the magnitude of the rhizospheric effects, perhaps due to the low resolution of PLFAs for classifying soil microbial communities. As science and technology have developed, especially in the last decade, high-throughput molecular technologies have been developed for characterizing microbial communities, including high-throughput DNA/RNA sequencing, PhyloChio, GeoChip, mass spectrometry-based proteomics for community analysis, and metabolite analysis63. In future studies, these molecular methods maybe able to provide a more comprehensive understanding of microbial responses to scenarios of global climate change.


N addition significantly increased BR in the rhizosphere and increased total, bacterial, fungal, G+, and G PLFAs in both the rhizosphere and bulk soil, but elevated CO2 only significantly increased total and fungal PLFAs in the rhizosphere when combined with N addition. These results demonstrated that N addition had a larger impact on the soil microbial communities than elevated CO2. Contrary to our second hypothesis, the rhizospheric effects of soil microbial variables were not significantly affected by elevated CO2 and N addition. These results suggest that the rhizospheres of B. ischaemum exert a more important control of community composition and structure than short-term elevated CO2 and N addition.

Materials and Methods

Plant species and soil used in the experiment

Seeds of B. ischaemum were collected in autumn 2013 from the natural grasslands at the Ansai Research Station (ARS) of the Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), on the Loess Plateau of China (36°51′30″N, 109°19′23″E, 1068–1309 m a.s.l.). The rates of seed germination were >90% when germinated on moist filter paper in Petri dishes at 25 °C prior to the experiment.

A sandy-loam soil collected from the upper 20 cm of a farmland at ARS was used for this study. Soil gravimetric water content at field capacity (FC) and the wilting point were 20.0 and 4.0%, respectively. The soil organic C (SOC), total N (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) contents were 1.50, 0.21, and 0.57 g kg−1, respectively.

Experimental design and sample collection

Each plastic pot (20 cm high, 15 cm in diameter) was separated vertically into two concentric zones, a central root zone and a root-free zone, by 25-μm nylon mesh bags (20 cm high, 9 cm in diameter) buried in the centers of the pots, enabling the passage of water and nutrients but not roots. The seeds of B. ischaemum were sown in the mesh bags on 1 June 2014. The soil-water content was maintained above 80% FC during the entire experiment.

The experiment began on 1 August 2014 after the seedlings were thinned to three per pot. The pots were transferred to two closed climate-controlled chambers (AGC-D001P, Qiushi Corp., Hangzhou, China) programmed at 13 h of light (28 °C, relative humidity (RH) of 50%, 300 μ (photons) m−2s−1) from 7:30 to 20:30 and 11 h of dark (22 °C, RH of 55%). The CO2 concentrations in the two chambers were maintained at 400 (ambient) and 800 (elevated) μmol mol−1 until the end of the experiment. An automatic control system was used to adjust the CO2 to the desired concentration in each chamber by regulating the influx rate of pure CO2 to the air blower. Each chamber housed three N-addition treatments (0 (control), 2.5, and 5 g N m−2 y−1). The N-addition treatments began on 18 August 2014. For each pot, NH4NO3 was dissolved in deionized water and then added to the pot soil, except for the control treatment where an equal volume of deionized water was added. N was added a total of six times during the experiment, with a frequency of every 15 days. The 0, 2.5, and 5 g N m−2 y−1 treatments received 0, 0.021, and 0.042 g NH4NO3, respectively, each time. All pots were weighed daily at 18:00, and water was added via plastic pipes to maintain soil-water contents above 80% FC. A total of six treatments were thus tested: ambient CO2 but no N added (AN0), ambient CO2 and 2.5 g N m−2 y−1 (AN1), ambient CO2 and 5 g N m−2 y−1 (AN2), elevated CO2 but no N added (EN0), elevated CO2 and 2.5 g N m−2 y−1 (EN1), and elevated CO2 and 5 g N m−2 y−1 (EN2). Each treatment had five replicates.

The experiment was completed on 15 November 2014. The soils of the root zone (adhering to the roots in the mesh bag) and the root-free zone (>1.5 cm outside the mesh bag) were collected and sieved through a 2-mm mesh. One subsample of each type of soil was air-dried, crushed, and passed through a 0.25-mm mesh for the determination of chemical properties, another subsample was stored at 4 °C for respiration and Biolog analysis, and a third subsample was stored at −20 °C for PLFA analysis.

Soil chemical properties

SOC content was determined by wet digestion with a mixture of potassium dichromate and concentrated sulfuric acid, TN content was determined by the semimicro Kjeldahl method after digestion by H2SO4, and TP content was determined colorimetrically after wet digestion with H2SO4 + HClO4.

Microbial respiration rate

The rate of soil microbial respiration was determined by CO2 emission64, 65. The basal respiration (BR) was determined by placing 10 g of each soil sample, moistened to 50–60% of the field capacity, in a hermetically sealed flask equipped with a rubber septum for gas sampling. The samples were then incubated at 28 °C for 7days under aerobic conditions, and the CO2 released was measured 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 days after incubation with an infrared gas analyzer (QGS-08B, Befen-Ruili Analytical Instrument Co. Ltd., Beijing, China). Soil samples were amended with 0.6% (w/w) glucose before incubation for determining substrate-induced respiration (SIR). The BR and SIR data are expressed as μg CO2 g−1dw h−1.

Community-level physiological profile (CLPP)

The CLPPs of the soil microbial communities were assessed using Biolog EcoPlates (Biolog, Hayward, USA) containing three replicates of 31 unique C substrates66. Briefly, soil samples were serially diluted to 10−3 suspensions in a sterile solution of 0.85% NaCl. The diluted suspensions were added to the Biolog EcoPlates, and all plates were incubated at 25 °C for one week. Color development was measured as optical density (OD) at 590 nm every 24 h using Microlog Rel 4.2 (Biolog, Hayward, USA). Negative optical densities or those under 0.06 were set to zero. The final OD of each well at 72 h was used to calculate the average well color development (AWCD), Shannon index (H), and Simpson index (D):




where x i is the optical density measured at 590 nm for substrate in the EcoPlates, c is the OD of the control well, 31 is the number of C sources, p i is the ratio of the absorbance in each well to the sum of absorbance for all wells, and n is the total number of C sources.


The method for phospholipid extraction was adapted from Buyer et al.67. Briefly, 3 g of lyophilized soil were placed in a 30-ml centrifuge tube with a Teflon-lined screw cap. The fatty acids were directly extracted from the soil twice by adding 3.6 ml of citrate buffer (pH 4.0), 4 ml of chloroform, and 8 ml of methanol. The PLFAs were separated from neutral and glycolipid fatty acids by solid-phase-extraction chromatography. After mild alkaline methanolysis, the PLFA samples were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed using an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) equipped with an autosampler, split-splitless injector, and flame ionization detector. The system was controlled with Agilent ChemiStation and MIDI Sherlock software (Microbial ID, Inc., Newark, USA). An external standard of 19:0 methyl ester was used for quantification.

We selected the following PLFA signatures to serve as indicators of specific microbial groups: iso- and anteiso-branched fatty acids for Gram-positive (G+) bacteria68, monounsaturated and cyclopropyl 17:0 and 19:0 fatty acids for Gram-negative (G) bacteria69, and 18:2w6c for fungi70. Total biomass was obtained by summing the concentrations of all fatty acids detected in each soil sample.

Statistical analysis

All results are expressed as means ± standard deviations. Rhizospheric effects were calculated as the percent difference between the rhizospheric and bulk-soil samples for each measured variable34, 36. Student’s t-tests were used to compare the values between the rhizosphere and bulk soil to indicate the statistical significance of the calculated rhizospheric effect. SOC, TN, and TP contents and microbial functional diversity did not differ significantly between the rhizosphere and bulk soil, so we have not reported the rhizospheric effects for these variables. Two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) at a probability level of 0.05 were used to assess the effects of elevated CO2, N addition, and their interaction on the biochemical properties of the rhizospheric and bulk soil and the rhizospheric effect for each variable. Means were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test for significant differences (P < 0.05). A principal component analysis examined the PLFA community structure among the treatments. The above statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA).


This research was funded by the Western Young Scholars of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XAB2015A05), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41371510, 41371508, and 41471438).

Author Contributions

Author Contributions

The manuscript was reviewed and approved for publication by all authors. S.X. conceived and designed the experiments. L.X. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, drew the figures and wrote the paper. G.B.L. and P.L. revised the paper.


Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


1. van der Putten WH, Bradford MA, Brinkman EP, van de Voorde TFJ, Veen GT. Where, when and how plant-soil feedback matters in a changing world. Funct. Ecol. 2016;30:1109–1121. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12657. [Cross Ref]
2. Larsen J, Jaramillo-Lopez P, Najera-Rincon M, Gonzalez-Esquivel CE. Biotic interactions in the rhizosphere in relation to plant and soil nutrient dynamics. J. Soil Sc. Plant Nutr. 2015;15:449–463.
3. Blankinship JC, Niklaus PA, Hungate BA. A meta-analysis of responses of soil biota to global change. Oecologia. 2011;165:553–565. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-1909-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Lee SH, Kang H. Elevated CO2 causes a change in microbial communities of rhizosphere and bulk soil of salt marsh system. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016;108:307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.09.009. [Cross Ref]
5. Xue S, et al. Effects of elevated CO2 and drought on the microbial biomass and enzymatic activities in the rhizospheres of two grass species in Chinese loess soil. Geoderma. 2017;286:25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10.025. [Cross Ref]
6. Freedman ZB, Romanowicz KJ, Upchurch RA, Zak DR. Differential responses of total and active soil microbial communities to long-term experimental N deposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015;90:275–282. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.08.014. [Cross Ref]
7. Grover M, Maheswari M, Desai S, Gopinath KA, Venkateswarlu B. Elevated CO2: Plant associated microorganisms and carbon sequestration. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015;95:73–85. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.05.006. [Cross Ref]
8. Kassem II, Joshi P, Sigler V, Heckathorn S, Wang Q. Effect of elevated CO2 and drought on soil microbial communities associated with Andropogon gerardii. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008;50:1406–1415. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00752.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Austin EE, Castro HF, Cooper K, Schadt CW, Classen AT. Assessment of 10 years of CO2 fumigation on soil microbial communities and function in a sweetgum plantation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009;41:514–520. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.010. [Cross Ref]
10. Guenet B, et al. The impact of long-term CO2 enrichment and moisture levels on soil microbial community structure and enzyme activities. Geoderma. 2012;170:331–336. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.12.002. [Cross Ref]
11. Hagedorn F, et al. Nine years of CO2 enrichment at the alpine treeline stimulates soil respiration but does not alter soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013;57:390–400. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.001. [Cross Ref]
12. Duan BL, et al. Long-term responses of plant growth, soil microbial communities and soil enzyme activities to elevated CO2 and neighbouring plants. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 2015;213:91–101. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.06.017. [Cross Ref]
13. Baronti S, Tognetti R, Lanini GM, Tonon G, Raschi A. Soil respiration and microbial activity in a Mediterranean grassland exposed to Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) Community Ecol. 2008;9:65–73. doi: 10.1556/ComEc.9.2008.S.10. [Cross Ref]
14. He ZL, et al. The phylogenetic composition and structure of soil microbial communities shifts in response to elevated carbon dioxide. ISME J. 2012;6:259–272. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.99. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Butterly CR, et al. Long-term effects of elevated CO2 on carbon and nitrogen functional capacity of microbial communities in three contrasting soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016;97:157–167. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.03.010. [Cross Ref]
16. Liu Y, et al. Short-term response of nitrifier communities and potential nitrification activity to elevated CO2 and temperature interaction in a Chinese paddy field. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015;96:88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.06.006. [Cross Ref]
17. Zheng JQ, et al. Microbial activity in a temperate forest soil as affected by elevated atmospheric CO2. Pedosphere. 2010;20:427–435. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60032-X. [Cross Ref]
18. Das S, Bhattacharyya P, Adhya TK. Interaction effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on microbial biomass and enzyme activities in tropical rice soils. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011;182:555–569. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-1897-x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Song YY, et al. Short-term effects of nitrogen addition and vegetation removal on soil chemical and biological properties in a freshwater marsh in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Catena. 2013;104:265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2012.12.008. [Cross Ref]
20. Zhou X, et al. Effects of 44 years of chronic nitrogen fertilization on the soil nitrifying community of permanent grassland. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015;91:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.08.031. [Cross Ref]
21. Ma WB, et al. Response of microbial functional groups involved in soil N cycle to N, P and NP fertilization in Tibetan alpine meadows. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016;101:195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.023. [Cross Ref]
22. Li FL, Liu M, Li ZP. Changes in soil microbial biomass and functional diversity with a nitrogen gradient in soil columns. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2013;64:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.10.006. [Cross Ref]
23. Chen D, Lan ZC, Hu SJ, Bai YF. Effects of nitrogen enrichment on belowground communities in grassland: Relative role of soil nitrogen availability vs. soil acidification. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015;89:99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.028. [Cross Ref]
24. Contosta AR, Frey SD, Cooper AB. Soil microbial communities vary as much over time as with chronic warming and nitrogen additions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015;88:19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.04.013. [Cross Ref]
25. He YT, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil microbial biomass and community functional diversity in temperate grassland in Inner Mongolia, China. Clean-Soil Air Water. 2013;41:1216–1221. doi: 10.1002/clen.201200021. [Cross Ref]
26. Sun S, et al. Response of bacterial community to simulated nitrogen deposition in soils and a unique relationship between plant species and soil bacteria in the Songnen grassland in Northeastern China. J. Soil Sc. Plant Nutr. 2014;14:565–580.
27. Franklin J, Serra-Diaz JM, Syphard AD, Regan HM. Global change and terrestrial plant community dynamics. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:3725–3734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519911113. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Lee SH, Kim SY, Ding WX, Kang H. Impact of elevated CO2 and N addition on bacteria, fungi, and archaea in a marsh ecosystem with various types of plants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;99:5295–5305. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6385-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Liu JX, et al. CO2 enrichment and N addition increase nutrient loss from decomposing leaf litter in subtropical model forest ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:7952. doi: 10.1038/srep07952. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Deng Q, et al. Seasonal responses of soil respiration to elevated CO2 and N addition in subtropical forest ecosystems in southern China. Ecol. Eng. 2013;61:65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.063. [Cross Ref]
31. Deng Q, et al. Responses of soil respiration to elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen addition in young subtropical forest ecosystems in China. Biogeosciences. 2010;7:315–328. doi: 10.5194/bg-7-315-2010. [Cross Ref]
32. Haase S, Philippot L, Neumann G, Marhan S, Kandeler E. Local response of bacterial densities and enzyme activities to elevated atmospheric CO2 and different N supply in the rhizosphere of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008;40:1225–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.12.025. [Cross Ref]
33. Ultra VU, Jr., Han SH, Kim DH. Soil properties and microbial functional structure in the rhizosphere of Pinusdensiflora (S. and Z.) exposed to elevated atmospheric temperature and carbon dioxide. J. Forest Res. 2013;18:149–158. doi: 10.1007/s10310-012-0333-6. [Cross Ref]
34. Phillips RP, Fahey TJ. Tree species and mycorrhizal associations influence the magnitude of rhizosphere effects. Ecology. 2006;87:1302–1313. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1302:TSAMAI]2.0.CO;2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Kuzyakov Y. Review: Factors affecting rhizosphere priming effects. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc. 2002;165:382–396. doi: 10.1002/1522-2624(200208)165:4<382::AID-JPLN382>3.0.CO;2-#. [Cross Ref]
36. Zhu B, Panke-Buisse K, Kao-Kniffin J. Nitrogen fertilization has minimal influence on rhizosphere effects of smooth crabgrass (Digitaria ischaemum) and bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) J. Plant Ecol. 2015;8:390–400. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtu034. [Cross Ref]
37. Liu ZP, Shao MA, Wang YQ. Spatial patterns of soil total nitrogen and soil total phosphorus across the entire loess plateau region of China. Geoderma. 2013;197-198:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.12.011. [Cross Ref]
38. Wei Y, et al. Preliminary estimate of the atmospheric nitrogen deposition in different ecological regions of Shaanxi province. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2010;29:795–800.
39. Han XW, Tsunekawa A, Tsubo M, Shao HB. Responses of plant-soil properties to increasing N deposition and implications for large-scale eco-restoration in the semiarid grassland of the northern Loess Plateau, China. Ecol. Eng. 2013;60:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.07.053. [Cross Ref]
40. Galloway JN, et al. Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry. 2004;70:153–226. doi: 10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0. [Cross Ref]
41. Xiao L, Liu GB, Zhang JY, Yang T, Xue S. Effects of elevated CO2, drought stress and nitrogen deposition on photosynthesis light response curves of Bothriochloa ischaemum. Acta Agrestia. Sin. 2016;24:69–75.
42. Xiao L, Liu GB, Li P, Xue S. Effects of nitrogen addition and elevated CO2 concentration on soil dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere of Bothriochloa ischaemum. Chinese J. Appl. Ecol. 2017;28:64–70.
43. Jia XX, Shao MA, Wei XR. Responses of soil respiration to N addition, burning and clipping in temperate semiarid grassland in northern China. Agr. Forest Meteoro. 2012;166-167:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.05.022. [Cross Ref]
44. Gao YH, Ma G, Zeng XY, Xu SQ, Wang DX. Responses of microbial respiration to nitrogen addition in two alpine soils in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. J. Environ. Biol. 2015;35:261–265. [PubMed]
45. Zhou LY, et al. Different responses of soil respiration and its components to nitrogen addition among biomes: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biol. 2014;20:2332–2334. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12490. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Luo QP, et al. The responses of soil respiration to nitrogen addition in a temperate grassland in northern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016;569-570:1466–1477. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.237. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Zhang CP, et al. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on soil respiration components and their temperature sensitivities in a semiarid grassland. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014;75:113–123. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.013. [Cross Ref]
48. Selsted MB, et al. Soil respiration is stimulated by elevated CO2 and reduced by summer drought: three years of measurements in a multifactor ecosystem manipulation experiment in a temperate heathland (CLIMAITE) Global Change Biol. 2012;18:1216–1230. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02634.x. [Cross Ref]
49. Liu Y, et al. Short-term responses of microbial community and functioning to experimental CO2 enrichment and warming in a Chinese paddy field. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014;77:58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.06.011. [Cross Ref]
50. De Graaff MA, van Groenigen KJ, Six J, Hungate B, van Kessel C. Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO2: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biol. 2006;12:2077–2091. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01240.x. [Cross Ref]
51. Das S, Bhattacharyya P, Adhya TK. Impact of elevated CO2, flooding, and temperature interaction on heterotrophic nitrogen fixation in tropical rice soils. Biol. Fert. Soils. 2011;47:25–30. doi: 10.1007/s00374-010-0496-2. [Cross Ref]
52. Long XE, Chen CR, Xu ZH, Oren R, He JZ. Abundance and community structure of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea in a temperate forest ecosystem under ten-years elevated CO2. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012;46:163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.12.013. [Cross Ref]
53. Shen RC, Xu M, Chi YG, Yu S, Wan SQ. Soil microbial responses to experimental warming and nitrogen addition in a temperate steppe of northern China. Pedosphere. 2014;24:427–436. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(14)60029-1. [Cross Ref]
54. Bowman WD, Murgel J, Blett T, Porter E. Nitrogen critical loads for alpine vegetation and soils in Rocky Mountain National Park. J. Environ. Manage. 2012;103:165–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Chen H, et al. Nitrogen saturation in humid tropical forests after 6 years of nitrogen and phosphorus addition: hypothesis testing. Funct. Ecol. 2016;30:305–313. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12475. [Cross Ref]
56. Zhang YX, Ruyter-Spira C, Bouwmeester HJ. Engineering the plant rhizosphere. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2015;32:136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.12.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
57. Tscherko D, Hammesfahr U, Marx MC, Kandeler E. Shifts in rhizosphere microbial communities and enzyme activity of Poa alpine across alpine chronosequence. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2004;36:1685–1689. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.004. [Cross Ref]
58. Xiao L, Liu GB, Xue S, Zhang C. Soil microbial community composition during natural recovery in the Loess Plateau, China. J. Integr. Agr. 2013;12:1872–1883. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60399-8. [Cross Ref]
59. Jia X, Zhou CJ. Effects of long-term elevated CO2 on rhizosphere and bulk soil bacterial community structure in Pinus sylvestriformis seedlings fields. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012;343–344:351–356.
60. Phillips RP, Fahey TJ. The influence of soil fertility on rhizosphere effects in northern hardwood forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2008;72:453–461. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0389. [Cross Ref]
61. Ai C, Liang GQ, Sun JW, Wang XB, Zhou W. Responses of extracellular enzyme activities and microbial community in both the rhizosphere and bulk soil to long-term fertilization practices in a fluvo-aquic soil. Geoderma. 2012;173–174:330–338. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.07.020. [Cross Ref]
62. Cheng WX, Johnson DW, Fu SL. Rhizosphere effects on decomposition: controls of plant species, phenology, and fertilization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2003;67:1418–1427. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2003.1418. [Cross Ref]
63. Zhou JZ, et al. High-throughput metagenomic technologies for complex microbial community analysis: open and closed formats. MBio. 2015;6:e02288–14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02288-14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
64. Hueso S, Henandez T, Garcia C. Resistance and resilience of the soil microbial biomass to severe drought in semiarid soils: The importance of organic amendments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2011;50:27–36.
65. Liu YZ, et al. Decline in topsoil microbial quotient, fungal abundance and C utilization efficiency of rice paddies under heavy metal pollution across South China. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038858. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
66. Garland JL. Patterns of potential C resources utilization by rhizosphere communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1996;28:223–230. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(95)00113-1. [Cross Ref]
67. Buyer JS, Teasdale JR, Roberts DP, Zasada IA, Manul JE. Factors affecting soil microbial community structure in tomato cropping systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010;42:831–841. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.01.020. [Cross Ref]
68. Zelles L. Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterization of microbial communities in soil: a review. Biol. Fert. Soils. 1999;29:111–129. doi: 10.1007/s003740050533. [Cross Ref]
69. Zelles L. Phospholipid fatty acid profiles in selected members of soil microbial communities. Chemosphere. 1997;35:275–294. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00155-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
70. Frostegård A, Bååth E. The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil. Biol. Fert. Soils. 1996;22:59–65. doi: 10.1007/BF00384433. [Cross Ref]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group