PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of iranjparaThis JournalSearchAims and ScopeAuthor GuidelinesSubmit a ManuscriptThis JournalTUMS
 
Iran J Parasitol. 2017 Apr-Jun; 12(2): 224–229.
PMCID: PMC5527032

Molecular Characterization and Analysis of 16S Ribosomal DNA in Some Isolates of Demodex folicullorum

Abstract

Background:

Demodicosis is one of the most prevalent skin diseases resulting from infestation by Demodex mites. This parasite usually inhabits in follicular infundibulum or sebaceous duct and transmits through close contact with an infested host.

Methods:

This study was carried from September 2014 to January 2016 at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. DNA extraction and amplification of 16S ribosomal RNA was performed on four isolates, already obtained from four different patients and identified morphologically though clearing with 10% Potassium hydroxide (KOH) and microscopical examination. Amplified fragments from the isolates were compared with GeneBank database and phylogenetic analysis was carried out using MEGA6 software.

Results:

A 390 bp fragment of 16S rDNA was obtained in all isolates and analysis of generated sequences showed high similarity with those submitted to GenBank, previously. Intra-species similarity and distance also showed 99.983% and 0.017, respectively, for the studied isolates. Multiple alignments of the isolates showed Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in 16S rRNA fragment. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that all 4 isolates clustered with other D. folliculorum, recovered from GenBank database. Our accession numbers KF875587 and KF875589 showed more similarity together in comparison with two other studied isolates.

Conclusion:

Mitochondrial 16S rDNA is one of the most suitable molecular barcodes for identification D. folliculorum and this fragment can use for intra-species characterization of the most human-infected mites.

Keywords: Iran, Demodex folliculorum, 16S rDNA, Phylogenetic analysis

Introduction

Demodicosis is a term attributed to the skin disorders caused by Demodex mites (class Arachnida and order Acarina) (1, 2). The most prevalent species that affect human skin are D. folliculorum and D. brevis. These species are usually found in follicular infundibulum or sebaceous duct and use sebum as nourishment (3, 4). Newborns can only acquire mites from close contact with infected individuals, but mite survival is low due to low sebum excretion in infants. Demodex mite infestation is typically established during the teenage years, and the chance of infestation is correlated with increasing age (5). The reports of infestation by Demodex are up to 80% in healthy skin (6, 7) that can increase in elderly people (8). In Iran, studies on Infestation with Demodex showing prevalence rate 15.2% in healthy control to 68.3% in patients with clinical manifestations (912). Although, different aspects of Demodex infestation in human has not been well known yet (13), but the infestation in animals is well established (3, 14). Cutaneous symptoms develop in human gradually due to increasing parasite populations (4, 15). Furthermore, heavy infestations are mostly reported in males compared to females, presumably due to greater number of subcutaneous glands in females (16).

However, species identification and classification is performed based on morphological characterizations in most of laboratories. The most important weaknesses of morphological characterization are lack of sensitivity to identify mix-infestation of simultaneous presence of D. folliculorum and D. brevis and complexity in characterization of similar but not same mites. On the other hand, molecular techniques can reveal interesting results in subspecies grouping and in the mix-infection (17, 18).

However, although D. folliculorum and D. brevis are the most prevalent Demodex mites reporting from all over the world, but phylogenetic studies have showed that there are several sequence types of both D. folliculorum and D. brevis (1922). The current study is the first molecular description of 16S DNA of Demodex folliculorum in Iran aimed to characterize and analysis of Demodex spp.

Materials and Methods

Study population

Samples of D. folicullorum included 4 different isolates which had already obtained during September 2014 to January 2016 and were kept out in Dermatology and Leprosy Research Center and Laboratories of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Public Health.

The current study was approved by the Ethic Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Morphological identification had been performed using Potassium hydroxide 10% solution (KOH) clarification and light microscopy examination (×40 and ×1000 magnifications).

Molecular analysis

DNA extraction was performed according to the protocol mentioned elsewhere (23) and then achieved DNA purified by Bioneer DNA Extraction Kit. Briefly, 400 μl lysis buffer was added to the mites in microtubes. Each sample was frozen and thawed for four times, then 25 μg/μl Proteinase K was added and all samples were incubated at 60 overnight. Finally, lysate transferred to Bioneer DNA Extraction kit and following steps were conducted according to manufacturer instruction. Extracted DNAs were eluted in Tris-EDTA (pH=7.5) and stored in −20 °C until further use.

PCR amplification and sequencing

PCR was performed using genus-specific primers, designed, based 16s rRNA gene using online software (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/). Following primers 16SF (5′ -GGTATTTTGACTGTGCTAAG 3′) and 16sR (5′- CAATTTTAATAGTCGAACAG 3′) amplified a 390 bp fragment of 16S rDNA. PCR reaction was performed in final volume 25 μl containing 2.5 μl of 10X PCR buffer, 2mM MgCl2, 200μM dNTP, 1.5 unit of Taq polymerase (Fermentase, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lithuania) and 10 [var rho]M of each primers. Distillated water and a known positive DNA were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Amplifications were carried out in PeqLab thermocycler (PEQLAB Biotechnology GmbH, Germany) under conditions: 95 °C for 4 min followed by 35 cycles consisting: 95 °C for 45 sec, 51 °C for 45 sec and 72 °C for 1 min and then a final extension stage at 72 °C for 7 min. PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel and then were visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Amplicons were purified using the QIAquick Gel Purification Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and Sequencing was performed by the Sanger method on an ABI 3730 sequencer (Bioneer, Daejeon, South Korea). The resulting sequences were analyzed using BLAST and submitted to GenBank.

Phylogenetic analysis

Our sequences beside D. folicullorum, D. canis, D. brevis and D. cati sequences, which were near together in BLAST comparison, were included in molecular analysis. Molecular alignment was performed using by ClustalW in Bioedit software and then phylogenetic tree was constructed using Molecular & Evolution Genetic Analysis software version 6 (MEGA 6) in Maximum-Likelihood test and Tamura 3 parameter model (24). For calculating the reliability of the tree, Bootstrap value with 1000 replication was considered.

Results

After DNA amplification, a 390 bp fragment of 16S DNA of D. folicullorum were obtained in all four isolates. All DNA sequences showed high similarity with other D. folicullorum, previously registered in GenBank database. All generated sequences were registered in GenBank database with accession numbers including KF875587, KF875588, KF875589 and KF875590.

The MEGA 6 software was employed to calculate intra-species distance and similarity. The intra-species distance rate and similarity among the isolates were 0.017 and 99.983%, respectively. Based on phylogenetic analysis, all four isolates placed beside other D. folliculorum, recovered from Gene Bank database. In addition, phylogenetic analysis showed that the isolates with accession numbers KF875587 and KF875589 had more similarity together in comparison with two other isolates (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1:
Phylogenetic tree of the mitochondrial 16S ribosomal DNA nucleotide sequences of D. folliculorum. The tree was constructed by using the Maximum-Likelihood test and Tamura-3 parameter model in MEGA software version 6. The numbers above the branches indicate ...

The tree was constructed by using the Maximum-Likelihood test and Tamura-3 parameter model in MEGA software version 6. The numbers above the branches indicate the percentage of bootstrap samplings percentages. Branches without numbers have frequencies of less than 75%. Besides the isolates reported in this study, which are marked by a black filled triangle, a number of accession numbers from other studies were applied in phylogenetic analysis. Abbreviations: PRC: People’s Republic of China; USA: United States of America; ESP: Spain

Multiple alignment analysis of the isolates was performed and the results showed that the isolate with accession number KF875588 had more Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) throughout the sequenced fragment than other isolates (Fig. 2).

Fig 2:
Alignment of mitochondrial 16S ribosomal DNA sequences of D. folliculorum isolates. The sequences of this study were aligned by using the ClustalW and Bioedit Software.

Discussion

Demodecosis has a wide host range and geographical distribution, all over the world (5, 25). Although classical characterization based on phenotypic properties had been used for years, molecular methods, however, has recently employed to characterize the different species of Demodex from the human and animal isolates.

Improving the molecular techniques has provided a new suitable tool for identification of the organism through which ribosomal DNA have considered a characteristic marker for identification and classification of different genera and species of Demodex spp., in recent decades (20, 22, 26).

Our study showed that the well-conserved mitochondrial 16S rDNA fragment has some SNPs variation among the same species, already identified as D. folliculorum based on morphological properties. In addition, phylogenetic findings revealed that although, all four isolates clustered with other sequences of D. folliculorum, retrieved from GenBank database, but there were some SNPs in multi-alignment analysis. This finding is in agreement with other studies that showed, molecular analysis using several mitochondrial genes fragments mitochondrial 16S rDNA could be a useful tool for phylogenetic analysis as well as characterization of not only different species of Demodex mites, but also the same species (21, 2729).

As phylogenetic tree exhibited, in spite of clustering of all D. folliculorum isolates together, but there were 8 alleles among D. folliculorum of our study as well as those sequences, registered in GenBank database, previously. This criterion of mitochondrial 16S rDNA in Demodex mites had also been observed in other studies (26, 30). However, our findings besides all other studies performed on phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial 16S rDNA showed that this fragment has competence to use as a barcoding tool for distinguishing between Demodex species and sub-species analysis.

However, the variations inside this fragment, observed in different studies, are likely attributed to the different colonies that infected hosts, some differences in parasite sites, skin type and source of infection as previously debated (18, 31).

However, the results of sequencing and analysis of the merely ribosomal DNA fragments suggest that other approaches such as Multi Locus Sequencing Test (MLST), which studies several genes’ fragments, are more suitable for clarifying the morphological and genetically feature.

Conclusion

Mitochondrial 16S rDNA is one of the most suitable molecular barcodes for identification of D. folliculorum, also used for iner-species and may be intra-species characterization of the most human-infected mites.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the School of Public Health, Deputy of Education, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. We wish to thank Mr. Geramishoar and Mrs. Mirsepahi for their valuable laboratory corporations. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

1. Akbulatova LKh. The pathogenic role of the mite Demodex and the clinical forms of demodicosis in man. Vestn Dermatol Venerol. 1966; 40 (12): 57– 61. [PubMed]
2. Rufli T, Mumcuoglu Y. The hair follicle mites Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis: biology and medical importance. A review. Dermatologica. 1981; 162 (1): 1– 11. [PubMed]
3. Basta-Juzbasic A, Subic JS, Ljubojevic S. Demodex folliculorum in development of dermatitis rosaceiformis steroidica and rosacea-related diseases. Clin Dermatol. 2002; 20 (2): 135– 40. [PubMed]
4. Baima B, Sticherling M. Demodicidosis revisited. Acta Derm Venereol. 2002; 82 (1): 3– 6. [PubMed]
5. Aylesworth R, Vance JC. Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis in cutaneous biopsies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982; 7 (5): 583– 9. [PubMed]
6. Ozdemir MH, Aksoy U, Sonmez E, et al. Prevalence of Demodex in health personnel working in the autopsy room. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2005; 26 (1): 18– 23. [PubMed]
7. Andrews JR. The prevalence of hair follicle mites in caucasian New Zealanders. N Z Med J. 1982; 95 (711): 451– 3. [PubMed]
8. Orru A, Pintus ML, Pinetti P. Studio sulla infestazione da Demodex folliculorum della cute umana normale. Rass Med Sarda. 1972; 75: 231– 44.
9. Zari J, Abdolmajid F, Masood M, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between androgenetic alopecia and demodex infestation. Indian J Dermatol. 2008; 53 (2): 64– 7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Moravvej H, Dehghan-Mangabadi M, Abbasian MR, et al. Association of rosacea with demodicosis. Arch Iran Med. 2007; 10 (2): 199– 203. [PubMed]
11. Talghini S, Fouladi DF, Babaeinejad S, et al. Demodex Mite, Rosacea and Skin Melanoma; Coincidence or Association?. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2015; 39 (1): 41– 6. [PubMed]
12. Tehrani S, Tizmaghz A, Shabestanipour G. The Demodex mites and their relation with seborrheic and atopic Dermatitis. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2014; 7 S1: S82– S84. [PubMed]
13. Elston DM. Demodex mites as a cause of human disease. Cutis. 2005; 76 (5): 294– 6. [PubMed]
14. Santarem VA, Farias MR, Tostes RA. Demodectic mange in fattening pigs in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2005; 131 (1–2): 169– 71. [PubMed]
15. Heacock CE. Clinical manifestations of demodicosis. J Am Optom Assoc. 1986; 57 (12): 914– 9. [PubMed]
16. Elston DM. Demodex mites: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2010; 28 (5): 502– 4. [PubMed]
17. Zhao YE, Cheng J, Hu L, et al. Molecular identification and phylogenetic study of Demodex caprae. Parasitol Res. 2014; 113 (10): 3601– 8. [PubMed]
18. Zhao YE, Hu L, Ma JX. Molecular identification of four phenotypes of human Demodex mites (Acari: Demodicidae) based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA. Parasitol Res. 2013; 112 (11): 3703– 11. [PubMed]
19. Zhao YE, Xu JR, Hu L, et al. Complete sequence analysis of 18S rDNA based on genomic DNA extraction from individual Demodex mites (Acari: Demodicidae). Exp Parasitol. 2012; 131 (1): 45– 51. [PubMed]
20. Hu L, Zhao YE, Cheng J, et al. Molecular identification of four phenotypes of human Demodex in China. Exp Parasitol. 2014; 142: 38– 42. [PubMed]
21. Zhao YE, Wu LP. Phylogenetic relationships in Demodex mites (Acari: Demodicidae) based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA partial sequences. Parasitol Res. 2012; 111 (3): 1113– 21. [PubMed]
22. Zhao YE, Wu LP, Hu L, et al. Sequencing for complete rDNA sequences (18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, and 28S rDNA) of Demodex and phylogenetic analysis of Acari based on 18S and 28S rDNA. Parasitol Res. 2012; 111 (5): 2109– 14. [PubMed]
23. Zhao YE, Cheng H, Xun M, Wu LP. Extraction and random primer PCR detection of genomic DNA of parasitic mites Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis (Acari: Demodicidae). Act Entomol Sin. 2009; 52: 929– 33.
24. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, et al. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013; 30 (12): 2725– 9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Czepita D, Kuzna-Grygiel W, Kosik-Bogacka D. [Investigations on the occurrence as well as the role of Demodex follicuforum and Demodex brevis in the pathogensis of blepharitis]. Klin Oczna. 2005; 107 (1–3): 80– 2. [PubMed]
26. Zhao YE, Hu L, Ma JX. Phylogenetic analysis of Demodex caprae based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequence. Parasitol Res. 2013; 112 (11): 3969– 77. [PubMed]
27. Lv J, Wu S, Zhang Y, et al. Assessment of four DNA fragments (COI, 16S rDNA, ITS2, 12S rDNA) for species identification of the Ixodida (Acari: Ixodida). Parasit Vectors. 2014; 7: 93. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Lv J, Wu S, Zhang Y, et al. Development of a DNA barcoding system for the Ixodida (Acari: Ixodida). Mitochondrial DNA. 2014; 25 (2): 142– 9. [PubMed]
29. De Rojas M, Riazzo C, Callejon R, et al. Morphobiometrical and molecular study of two populations of Demodex folliculorum from humans. Parasitol Res. 2012; 110 (1): 227– 33. [PubMed]
30. Sastre N, Ravera I, Villanueva S, et al. Phylogenetic relationships in three species of canine Demodex mite based on partial sequences of mitochondrial 16S rDNA. Vet Dermatol. 2012; 23 (6): 509– e101. [PubMed]
31. Bourdeau P. Variation in size in Demodex canis: from the shortest to the longest forms. Vet Dermatol. 2009; 21: 213.

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences