PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of etjKargerHomeAlertsResources
 
Eur Thyroid J. 2017 February; 6(1): 3–11.
Published online 2016 December 22. doi:  10.1159/000449463
PMCID: PMC5465719

Variability among TSH Measurements Can Be Reduced by Combining a Glycoengineered Calibrator to Epitope-Defined Immunoassays

Abstract

Objectives

Measuring protein markers with variable glycosylation, such as thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), with high accuracy is not an easy task. Despite highly sensitive third-generation tests, discrepancies among TSH assays still remain unsolved and are the focus of important standardization efforts. Earlier work from our group showed that a lack of similarity in epitope expression between standards and samples may account for discordant hormone measurements. In this study, we aimed at producing a glycoengineered TSH with serum-type glycosylation and compared its immunological behavior to that of the international standards.

Study Design

Recombinant glycoengineered TSH (rgTSH) was produced in glycoengineered Chinese hamster ovary cells to express a highly sialylated TSH and tested in newly designed assays. Two groups of assays targeting defined epitopes were constructed and TSH levels were estimated in a panel of 84 clinical samples (2.1-22.4 mIU/l) based on the use of the current 3rd IS 81/565, the 1st IRP 94/674 and rgTSH calibrations.

Results

Calibration based on rgTSH was found to significantly reduce the percentage difference means of assays compared to the pituitary standard. We also found that a switch from a mIU/l (3rd IS 81/565) to ng/l (rgTSH) basis can be established within the normal as well as in the mid to upper normal range of TSH levels. Of interest, TSH assays targeting the main immunogenic region displayed variable TSH values, indicating that, in this region, epitopes should be defined for assays to deliver similar values.

Conclusions

A glycoengineered TSH with serum-type glycosylation proved to be a new calibrator efficient in harmonizing TSH values.

Key Words: Thyroid-stimulating hormone measurements, Immunoassays, Glycosylation, Recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone, Harmonization

Introduction

Over the past years substantial variability among thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) measurements has been extensively described, largely influencing the critical discrimination between normal and diseased TSH levels [1]. To overcome this limitation and meet the expectations of regulatory bodies, an important international effort has been developed towards a standardization of TSH immunoassays [2].

Several issues have been consistently debated by the laboratory medicine community to account for such a situation [3], and a lack of structural similarity between standard and serum TSH remains a key limitation [4]. Also, the measurement of bioactive TSH has never been approached or documented. Previously, we demonstrated that changes in TSH glycosylation, especially sialylation [5], significantly alter antibody recognition [6,7,8]. TSH is an N-glycosylated protein hormone for which glycosylation is essential for hormone folding, activity and duration in the blood [9]. The current international standard, namely the 3rd IS 81/565 extracted from the pituitary (pitTSH), is composed of a heterogeneous mixture of predominantly N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc)-sulfated biantennary glycoforms [5,10]. Such TSH is short lived because it is specifically cleared from the circulation by a liver GalNAc-sulfate receptor [11]. In contrast, circulating TSH is essentially composed of sialylated glycans [12,13,14] which escape hepatic clearance [11,15] and is long-lived [16]. Since the sialylation of TSH increases as hypothyroidism develops [12,13,14], we hypothesized that assays may differentially bind TSH variants in an extractive standard and in serum samples, and thus deliver incorrect TSH values.

Very early on, a preparation of recombinant TSH (recTSH) was produced in mammalian cells to replace extractive standards [17] but the preparation did not meet this expectation [18]. Even though expression systems may synthesize complex glycans of a mammalian type, they often lack the α2,6-sialic acid [19,20] typical of human serum glycoproteins and also found in hypothyroid TSH [21]. So far, biotechnological processes have not been sufficient to provide fully sialylated products [22] and recombinant preparations still differ from native glycoproteins. Recently, our group was able to design a panel of minigenes to produce sialyltransferases of enhanced activity and perform efficient serum-type sialylation [22,23,24]. In this study, we engineered cells with such a variant of the human α2,6-sialyltransferase [25] and produced a TSH calibrator with a high content in sialic acid designed herein as recombinant glycoengineered TSH (rgTSH).

To solve discordances among assays, we postulated that only antibodies targeting regions equally shared by all TSHs will achieve the necessary accuracy. We therefore constructed about 100 assays targeting the 2 same antigenic regions of TSH and compared their ability to measure TSH levels in 84 clinical samples (2.1-22.4 mIU/l) based on various calibrators. We identified 2 groups of assays for which calibration with rgTSH proved to reduce variability among TSH measurements and achieve conversion from international to mass units.

Materials and Methods

TSH Preparations

The international standards were obtained from the National Institute for Biological Standards and Controls (South Mimms, UK), recTSH from ThermoFischer Scientific (Courtaboeuf, France) and pitTSH from Aalto Bio Reagents (Dublin, Ireland). To produce rgTSH, we transfected α- and β-TSH genes (Uniprot P01215 and P01222, respectively) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably engineered with a tagged α2,6-sialyltransferase minigene [25]. Clone selection was performed in Ham's F12 Medium (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) and production occurred in a chemically defined medium (Dominique Dutscher, Brumath, France). TSH was collected and stored at −20°C.

Immunostaining

Cells were fixed in 10% formalin (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) and saturated with 5% goat serum. α2,6-sialylation was detected with biotinylated Sambucus nigra agglutinin (SNA; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif., USA) and streptavidin-TRITC (ThermoFisher Scientific, Courtaboeuf, France). After permeabilization with 0.05% Triton (Sigma-Aldrich), labeling of the transferase was performed with an anti-Flag monoclonal antibody (mAb; Sigma-Aldrich) and FITC-conjugated antibodies (ThermoFisher Scientific). The cells were finally fixed in DAPI-containing mountant (ThermoFisher Scientific) and analyzed with a confocal microscope (Zeiss, Marly-le-Roi, France).

TSH Glycoprofiling

Lectins (Vector Laboratories) were coated on 96-well plates and the binding of TSH was revealed using anti-TSH mAb (DIASource ImmunoAssays, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibodies (ThermoFisher Scientific). Antibody glycosylation was controlled not to interfere with lectin binding. Detection was performed with UltraTMB (ThermoFisher Scientific). Optical density was measured at 450 nm (BioTek Instruments, Colmar, France).

TSH Bioactivity

CHO cells expressing the recombinant human TSH-receptor were exposed to the same amounts (mIU) of various TSH preparations for 2 h in modified hypotonic medium [26] supplemented with 10 mM HEPES (ThermoFisher Scientific, Illkirch, France), 0.25 mM of isobutylmethylxanthine (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.75% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich), pH 7.4. Cyclic AMP released from the cells was measured by RIA (Immunotech, Marseille, France). The negative sera of pooled TSH-receptor antibodies (normal sera) were used to measure cAMP basal production. Results were expressed as the ratio of secreted cAMP (nM) to TSH (mIU/l).

TSH Immunoassays

Mass estimation of rgTSH was carried out by amino acid analysis (Alphalyse, Odense, Denmark) of a purified recTSH followed by immunological assessment. Coated anti-TSH mAbs (antibodies-online, DIASource ImmunoAssays and ThermoFisher Scientific) were incubated with TSH samples supplemented or not with a 50 mM of phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, containing 5% BSA and a human anti-mouse antibody-blocking reagent (Fitzgerald Industries International, Acton, Mass., USA) to avoid interferences with circulating antibodies [27]. Bound TSH was revealed with in-house biotinylated (Roche, Meylan, France) anti-TSH mAbs and HRP-streptavidin (ThermoFisher Scientific). Detection was performed with ABTS (Sigma-Aldrich) or UltraTMB. Optical density was measured at 405 or 450 nm, respectively (Biochrom, Cambridge, UK).

Forward-Phase Protein Microarray - Infrared

Anti-TSH mAbs were spotted on microarrays and TSH (1,000 pg/ml) was allowed to bind before adding infrared-labeled anti-TSH mAbs. TSH binding was analyzed at 670 nm (Innopsys, Carbonne, France).

Serum Samples

Serum samples were collected anonymously and stored at −20°C. TSH levels were measured using the same immunoradiometric assay (IM3712-IM3713; Beckman-Coulter, Villepinte, France) and calibrator vials provided by the manufacturer. The procedures were approved by the local institution's responsible committee.

Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was conducted using the one-way ANOVA test. Calculations were performed using Analysis ToolPak (Microsoft Excel add-in program).

Results

Production and Characterization of rgTSH

Figure Figure11 shows that the α2,6-sialyltransferase minigene was correctly expressed in glycoengineered cells and the enzyme was fully active, delivering sialylated proteins intensely labeled at the cell surface. The glycosylation pattern of rgTSH was compared to those of primary standards. Commercial pitTSH had to be substituted for the 3rd IS 81/565 because of the presence of lactose that inhibits lectin binding. All TSHs showed different profiles. pitTSH showed a higher ConA signal, most probably due to a high content in biantennary structures [5,28,29,30], and elevated core fucosylation (LCA), but very low level of galactose (ECL), α2,3- (WGA) and α2,6-sialic acid (SNA) because its glycans terminate in sulfated-GalNAc [5,10] (fig. (fig.2a).2a). recTSH was also poorly sialylated (fig. (fig.2b),2b), while rgTSH contained a high level of α2,6-linked sialic acid (fig. (fig.2c).2c). Both recombinant preparations exhibited a low content in core fucose. Such a glycosylation profile for rgTSH was reproducible over several runs of production (data not shown).

Fig. 1
Expression of TSH in CHO cells stably transfected with an engineered α2,6-sialyltransferase enzyme. Cells were stably expressing TSH (a) or TSH and engineered ST6Gal (b). Nuclei were colored with DAPI (in blue; colors refer to the online version ...
Fig. 2
Characterization of TSH glycosylation. Lectin binding was performed on commercially available pitTSH (a), TSH produced in CHO cells (recTSH; b) and TSH produced in ST6Gal-engineered CHO cells (rgTSH; c). Concanavalin A (ConA) binds core-trimannose of ...

When tested for activity, rgTSH was found to be more than 3-fold more active than recTSH in activating its receptor compared with the commercial recombinant product (2.35 ± 0.18 vs. 0.74 ± 0.05 nmol/IU; p < 0.05).

Epitope-Defined Immunoassays

Figure Figure33 shows that the panel of antibodies used in this study shared the same specificity and targeted the same 2 main antigenic regions: cluster (I) is designated as the main immunogenic region (MIR) and cluster (III) as a remote cluster. Both of them contain several determinants and have been shown to be targeted in laboratory medicine [5]. It is worth noting that in cluster (I), epitopes are distributed within a large area and thereby allow 2 anti-MIR antibodies to bind. Conversely, cluster (III) is more limited and does not allow the intrapairing of antibodies. As a result, targeting each of the epitopes in these 2 regions allowed the construction of about 100 different sandwich assays which all bind TSH in the same 2 regions, albeit through different modes.

Fig. 3
Schematic representation of the epitope-defined strategy based on the MIR of TSH.

Combining cluster (III) to the MIR (I) allowed the design of group A assays with 19 combinations effective in the serum matrix. A1, A2 and A3 assays were selected as they displayed the best analytical limits of detection [31] of 23.6, 2.4 and 2.4 pg/ml, respectively. Additionally, 79 other combinations were able to additionally bind epitopes within the MIR in an intrapairing mode (group B assays). Seven such assays showed higher TSH binding than group A assays. We selected 4 of them (fig. (fig.4a4a,,4b4b,,4c4c,,4D),4D), B1, B2, B3 and B4, with analytical limits of detection of 30.1, 8.8, 3.7 and 22.5 pg/ml, respectively. They also showed enhanced TSH binding in sera from hypothyroid patients (fig. (fig.4e4e,,4f4f,,4g4g,,4h).4h). These 7 assays thus displayed enhanced recognition of TSH compared to group A by targeting different epitopes in the same regions (table (table11).

Fig. 4
Comparative binding of group A and group B assays: B1 (a, e), B2 (b, f), B3 (c, g) and B4 (d, h). a-d Dose-dependent curves of rgTSH. Group A assays are represented with squares and circles and continuous lines, group B assays are represented with triangles ...
Table 1
Composition of epitope-defined assays

Quantitative Antibody Binding

As shown in figure figure5,5, assays from both groups displayed 2- to 5-fold higher quantitative binding of rgTSH than pitTSH, possibly because the IS preparation contains a significant amount of denatured/nonimmunoreactive TSH due to its prolonged storage [32]. Again, most group B assays showed quite a superior binding capacity, with the highest signals being observed with B2 and B3 for both calibrations.

Fig. 5
Quantitative antibody binding based on forward-phase protein microarray - infrared. Group A assays (A1 to A3) and group B assays (B1 to B4) were tested for their binding to the 3rd IS pitTSH 81/565 (white bars) and to rgTSH (gray bars). The current IS ...

TSH Measurements of Serum Samples

Group A and B assays were further compared within a panel of 84 human sera covering the range from euthyroid subjects to hypothyroid patients (2.1-22.4 mIU/l). These were based on 3 calibrations: rgTSH (pg/ml) as well as the 3rd IS pitTSH 81/565 and the 1st IRP recTSH 94/674 (mIU/l).

Table Table22 shows that the comparison of TSH measurements (x, 3rd IS81/565; y, rgTSH) delivered a linear relationship with a high correlation factor (R2 >0.94) for both groups A and B. Similar results (R2 >0.99) were obtained with the 1st IRP 94/674 (x). The slopes represent the conversion factor (ng/mIU) relevant under our experimental conditions, and their variations indicate that assays such as A1 or B1 with elevated slopes bind rgTSH more efficiently than the current IS when compared to A2 or B4 assays.

Table 2
Correlation between rgTSH and the 2 international standards

We also analyzed the mean bias (y = mean - assay/mean × 100) relative to the mean sample (x) (fig. (fig.6).6). As anticipated, the distribution of TSH values was clearly dependent on the calibration. Group A assays calibrated with the 3rd IS 81/565 delivered TSH values that were significantly different from each other (p < 0.05), with A2 significantly different from A1 and A3 (p < 0.05). In striking contrast, the same assays delivered comparable TSH values with rgTSH calibration (p > 0.05) centered on the origin axis. The 1st IRP 94/674 behaved as an intermediate situation (fig. (fig.6a6a,,6b6b,,6c).6c). A1 and A2 performances have to be correlated with the most elevated and the low conversion factor respectively obtained with pituitary calibration (table (table2).2). Instead, changes in calibration did not much affect measurements of group B assays: all assays gave a significantly comparable TSH dataset (p > 0.05; fig. fig.6d6d,,6e6e,,6f).6f). Of note, 3 out of 84 individual samples showed increased difference means in the high TSH levels with assays B1 and B2, and therefore may not be representative of the cohort.

Fig. 6
Percentage difference plots of assays as a function of their calibration and construction. Calibrations were the 3rd IS pitTSH 81/565 (a, d), the 1st IRP recTSH 94/674 (b, e) and rgTSH (c, f) calibrations; group A assays (a-c) and group B assays (d-f ...

Discussion

By definition, if immunoreactive molecules present in standard and samples are not similar, an immunoassay is decreed to be invalid and the results have no significance [33]. Structural identity is not optimally achieved in TSH assays currently used in laboratory medicine because a variable amount of long-lived TSHs have to be measured, which are low in standard and high in serum [34]. Since TSH sialylation is progressively enhanced along with thyroid deficiency [12,13,14], a lack of similarity is thus increasing between standards and samples, thereby introducing variability between measurements [1]. This is probably also affecting the accuracy in the decision limit. In this study, we have produced a glycoengineered TSH to provide unlimited supply of a highly sialylated hormone which can mimic serum TSH. It appears that this material is active in stimulating the TSH receptor and elicits signal transduction. Based on these 2 innovative findings, we elaborated a strategy to achieve similar antibody recognition in both standard and samples, and ultimately assessed rgTSH as a potential calibrator and measure of the TSH level in a functional way.

TSH Standards

Over the past 50 years, international standards have been extracted from pituitaries and their immunological activity expressed in arbitrary international units. The first standard 63/14 set up in 1963 was assessed for bioactivity and the others followed by successive immunological assignments, including the 3rd IS 81/565 established 10 years ago [32,35]. Meanwhile, the assessment of the 1st IRP 94/674 as a potential recombinant standard [18] indicated that replacement of extractive materials by a recombinant preparation may not be without problems [35]. The production of recombinant TSH with a high content in α2,6-sialylation indeed requires complex glycoengineering, because such glycosylation is absent in most if not all expression systems, including human cell lines [36]. It is worth noting that hypersialylated rgTSH proved to be biologically active and displayed an immunological behavior similar to serum TSH. Furthermore, a conversion factor could be determined between rgTSH and the 3rd IS 81/565, suggesting that shifting from international to mass units is technically feasible and applicable to routine assays in laboratory medicine. rgTSH can thus be satisfactorily used as the first calibrator to measure bioactive TSH.

Epitope-Defined Strategy

Since most assays used in laboratory medicine display variable recognition of TSH [5,8] and deliver discordant values [1], we wanted to identify which epitopes should be best targeted to measure serum TSH with the highest accuracy. rgTSH was found to essentially share 2 main regions with pitTSH [5], in full agreement with previous studies [37,38], including antibodies kindly provided by in vitro diagnostic manufacturers [5]. We thus compared assays which bind these 2 clusters but through different epitopes and sandwich modes. Quantitative binding analysis revealed that such assays indeed differently quantitated a given amount of TSH. We further observed that group A assays behaved differently when calibrated with the 3rd IS 81/565 and with rgTSH, suggesting that the MIR targeted in all of these assays must play a pivotal role in the binding capacity of each assay. It may very well be that all the MIR epitopes are not present in all these TSHs. We therefore concluded that epitope expression in this large region may vary between standards and samples and introduce significant discrepancies among measurements. Alternatively, group B was found to display similar TSH values, suggesting assays need to combine several epitopes to equally bind all TSHs and deliver harmonized TSH values. It is tempting to speculate that group A assays, particularly A1 and A2, differentially bind TSH glycoforms present in the pituitary standard and serum, thereby leading to the over- or underestimation of the TSH level, while group A as well as group B assays equally measure TSH because in rgTSH calibration they found the full array of glycoforms commonly found in serum.

Harmonization of TSH Measurements

While this work was ongoing, the Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests studied the validation of a mathematical recalibration as a method for harmonizing TSH measurements [39,40]. So far, the gain of recalibration has appeared rather minimal, especially in the upper normal range (>5 mIU/l) [40], indicating that results are not necessarily improved and the concentration of decision limit still remains unsolved. Alternatively, we demonstrated herein that changing the secondary calibrator to rgTSH can substantially reduce variability in TSH measurements over the whole clinical range.

Conclusions

Introducing rgTSH as a new calibrator may provide a practical approach to the harmonization of TSH measurements. It may help in solving current limitations with regulatory authorities and establish a reliable basis for traceability because a bioproduct is virtually unlimited in supply and its quality control is easily monitored. Meanwhile, measuring bioactive TSH should also benefit assays in increasing diagnostic performances and ultimately achieve an optimal clinical outcome.

Disclosure Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Chloé Iss and Nassima Major for their expert technical contributions. We warmly thank the Nuclear Medicine Laboratory and the Endocrinology Service from the Hospital of Chambery (France) for their fruitful contribution to the ‘TSH Testing’ project. We especially acknowledge Anne-Marie Choudin, Marie-Agnes Coutier, Claudette Jamier, Marine Simon and Rosika Turnar for their support in routine TSH measurements, as well as Gilles Gros for his scientific contribution.

References

1. Steele BW, Wang E, Klee GG, Thienpont LM, Soldin SJ, Sokoll LJ, Winter WE, Fuhrman SA, Elin RJ. Analytic bias of thyroid function tests: analysis of a College of American Pathologists fresh frozen serum pool by 3,900 clinical laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:310–317. [PubMed]
2. Miller WG, Tate JR, Barth JH, Jones GR. Harmonization: the sample, the measurement, and the report. Ann Lab Med. 2014;34:187–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Faix JD, Thienpont LM, American Association for Clinical Chemistry Thyroid-stimulating hormone: why efforts to harmonize testing are critical to patient care. https://www.aacc.org/publications/cln/articles/2013/may/tsh-harmonization (accessed May 1, 2013).
4. Donadio-Andréi S, Chikh K, Iss C, Kuczewski E, Gauchez A-S, Ronin C, Charrié A. How significant is the TSH level in the circulation? Immuno Anal Biol Spéc. 2013;28:223–239.
5. Donadio S, Morelle W, Pascual A, Romi-Lebrun R, Michalski JC, Ronin C. Both core and terminal glycosylation alter epitope expression in thyrotropin and introduce discordances in hormone measurements. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43:519–530. [PubMed]
6. Ronin C, Papandréou MJ, Sergi S, Labbé-Jullié C, Medri G, Hoffmann T, Darbon H. Glycosylation-dependent epitope mapping of human TSH (hTSH) isoforms. Int J Rad Appl Instrum B. 1990;17:651–656. [PubMed]
7. Sergi I, Papandreou MJ, Medri G, Canonne C, Verrier B, Ronin C. Immunoreactive and bioactive isoforms of human thyrotropin. Endocrinology. 1991;128:3259–3268. [PubMed]
8. Donadio S, Pascual A, Thijssen JH, Ronin C. Feasibility study of new calibrators for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) immunoprocedures based on remodeling of recombinant TSH to mimic glycoforms circulating in patients with thyroid disorders. Clin Chem. 2006;52:286–297. [PubMed]
9. Szkudlinski MW, Grossmann M, Leitolf H, Weintraub BD. Human thyroid-stimulating hormone: structure-function analysis. Methods. 2000;21:67–81. [PubMed]
10. Szkudlinski MW, Thotakura NR, Weintraub BD. Subunit-specific function of N-linked oligosaccharides in human thyrotropin: role of terminal residues of α- and β-subunit oligosaccharides in metabolic clearance and bioactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:9062–9066. [PubMed]
11. Fiete D, Srivastava V, Hindsgaul O, Baenziger JU. A hepatic reticuloendothelial cell receptor specific for SO4-4GalNAcβ1, 4GlcNAcβ1,2Manα that mediates rapid clearance of lutropin. Cell. 1991;67:1103–1110. [PubMed]
12. Miura Y, Perkel VS, Papenberg KA, Johnson MJ, Magner JA. Concanavalin-A, lentil, and ricin lectin affinity binding characteristics of human thyrotropin: differences in the sialylation of thyrotropin in sera of euthyroid, primary, and central hypothyroid patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;69:985–995. [PubMed]
13. Papandreou MJ, Persani L, Asteria C, Ronin C, Beck-Peccoz P. Variable carbohydrate structures of circulating thyrotropin as studied by lectin affinity chromatography in different clinical conditions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77:393–398. [PubMed]
14. Trojan J, Theodoropoulou M, Usadel KH, Stalla GK, Schaaf L. Modulation of human thyrotropin oligosaccharide structures - enhanced proportion of sialylated and terminally galactosylated serum thyrotropin isoforms in subclinical and overt primary hypothyroidism. J Endocrinol. 1998;158:359–365. [PubMed]
15. Pricer WE, Jr, Ashwell G. The binding of desialylated glycoproteins by plasma membranes of rat liver. J Biol Chem. 1971;246:4825–4833. [PubMed]
16. Joziasse DH, Lee RT, Lee YC, Biessen EAL, Schiphorst WECM, Koeleman CAM, van den Eijnden DH. α3-Galactosylated glycoproteins can bind to the hepaticasialoglycoprotein receptor. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:6501–6508. [PubMed]
17. Ribela MT, Bianco AC, Bartolini P. The use of recombinant human thyrotropin produced by Chinese hamster ovary cells for the preparation of immunoassay reagents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:249–256. [PubMed]
18. Rafferty B, Gaines Das R. Comparison of pituitary and recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone (rhTSH) in a multicenter collaborative study: establishment of the first World Health Organization reference reagent for rhTSH. Clin Chem. 1999;45:2207–2215. [PubMed]
19. Lee EU, Roth J, Paulson JC. Alteration of terminal glycosylation sequences on N-linked oligosaccharides of Chinese hamster ovary cells by expression of β-galactoside α2,6-sialyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:13848–13855. [PubMed]
20. Morelle W, Donadio S, Ronin C, Michalski JC. Characterization of N-glycans of recombinant human thyrotropin using mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2006;20:331–345. [PubMed]
21. Helton TE, Magner JA. Sialyltransferase messenger ribonucleic acid increases in thyrotrophs of hypothyroid mice: in situ hybridization study. Endocrinology. 1994;134:2347–2353. [PubMed]
22. Donadio-Andréi S, Iss C, El Maï N, Calabro V, Ronin C. Glycoengineering of protein-based therapeutics. Carbohydr Chem. 2012;38:94–123.
23. Legaigneur P, Breton C, El Battari A, Guillemot JC, Auge C, Malissard M, Berger EG, Ronin C. Exploring the acceptor substrate recognition of the human β-galactoside α2,6-sialyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:21608–21617. [PubMed]
24. Kuhn B, Benz J, Greif M, Engel AM, Sobek H, Rudolph MG. The structure of human α-2,6-sialyltransferase reveals the binding mode of complex glycans. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2013;69:1826–1838. [PubMed]
25. El Maï N, Donadio-Andréi S, Iss C, Calabro V, Ronin C. Engineering a human-like glycosylation to produce therapeutic glycoproteins based on 6-linked sialylation in CHO cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;988:19–29. [PubMed]
26. Kasagi K, Konishi J, Iida Y, Ikekubo K, Mori T, Kuma K, Torizuka K. A new in vitro assay for human thyroid stimulator using cultured thyroid cells: effect of sodium chloride on adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate increase. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1982;54:108–114. [PubMed]
27. Tate J, Ward G. Interferences in immunoassay. Clin Biochem Rev. 2004;25:105–120. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Gupta D, Oscarson S, Raju TS, Stanley P, Toone EJ, Brewer CF. A comparison of the fine saccharide-binding specificity of Dioclea grandiflora lectin and concanavalin A. Eur J Biochem. 1996;242:320–326. [PubMed]
29. Fouquaert E, Smith DF, Peumans WJ, Proost P, Balzarini J, Savvides SN, Damme EJ. Related lectins from snowdrop and maize differ in their carbohydrate-binding specificity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;380:260–265. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Iskratsch T, Braun A, Paschinger K, Wilson IB. Specificity analysis of lectins and antibodies using remodeled glycoproteins. Anal Biochem. 2009;386:133–146. [PubMed]
31. Massart C, Charrié A, Sault C. Critères et contrôles de qualité In: Massart C, editor. Immunoanalyse. De la théorie aux critères de choix en biologie clinique. Les Ulis: EDP Sciences; 2006. pp. 159–183.
32. Gaines Das RE, Bristow AF. The second international reference preparation of thyroid-stimulating hormone, human, for immunoassay: calibration by bioassay and immunoassay in an international collaborative study. J Endocr. 1985;104:367–379. [PubMed]
33. Ekins R. Immunoassay standardization. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1991;205:33–46. [PubMed]
34. Müller MM. Implementation of reference systems in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem. 2000;46:1907–1909. [PubMed]
35. Rafferty B, Gaines Das RE, World Health Organization Biologicals Unit; WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization . Report of an international collaborative study of the proposed 3rd international standard for thyroid-stimulating hormone, human, for immunoassays. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
36. Swiech K, Picanço-Castro V, Covas DT. Human cells: new platform for recombinant therapeutic protein production. Protein Expres Purif. 2012;84:147–153. [PubMed]
37. Soos M, Siddle K. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies directed against human thyroid stimulating hormone. J Immunol Methods. 1982;51:57–68. [PubMed]
38. Benkirane MM, Bon D, Costagliola S, Paolucci F, Darbouret B, Princé P, Carayon P. Monoclonal antibody mapping of the antigenic surface of human thyrotropin and its subunits. Endocrinology. 1987;121:1171–1177. [PubMed]
39. Thienpont LM, van Uytfanghe K, Beastall G, Faix JD, Ieiri T, Miller WG, Nelson JC, Ronin C, Ross HA, Thijssen JH, Toussaint B. Report of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests; part 1: thyroid-stimulating hormone. Clin Chem. 2010;56:902–911. [PubMed]
40. Thienpont LM, van Uytfanghe K, van Houcke S, Das B, Faix JD, MacKenzie F, Quinn FA, Rottmann M, van den Bruel A, IFCC Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests A progress report of the IFCC Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests. Eur Thyroid J. 2014;3:109–116. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from European Thyroid Journal are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers