|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
In this work, a ZnO-layered double hydroxide@graphitic carbon nitride composite (ZnO-LDH@C3N4) was synthesized via co-precipitation method with solvothermal treatment. The structure and morphology of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopes/transmission electron microscopes (SEM/TEM), N2 adsorption/desorption, ultraviolet visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV-Vis-DRS), photoluminescence spectrometer (PL) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The adsorption and photocatalytic properties of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite towards the organic dyes: Orange II sodium salt (OrgII, an anionic azo dye) and methylene blue (MB, a cationic azo dye) were investigated. Compared to ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4, the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite displayed an excellent performance in both adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of the organic dyes. Moreover, a combination of ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4 significantly improved the photocatalytic performance of ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4 under visible-light irradiation. The adsorption and photocatalytic mechanism were also investigated.
Several commonly used dyes that are toxic and mutagenic for aquatic organisms can even be carcinogenic for humans . Adsorption and photodegradation are the common methods that can be used to eliminate the dyes in water. Recently, layered double hydroxides (LDHs), a family of anionic clay, have attracted much attention in the removal of organic dyes from wastewater due to their unique properties such as high ionic exchange capacity, tunable particle size, large surface area and various composition as well as good stability [2,3,4]. LDHs and the layered double oxide (LDO) by thermal treatment of LDH have displayed high adsorption capacity for organic dyes such as Orange II (Org II) [5,6,7]. Removal of the adsorbed organic dyes in the solid adsorbent is an essential step if the technology is to be used in practice. Photocatalytic degradation is a sustainable and green approach to removing the adsorbed dyes. However, these LDHs and their derivatives are only photocatalytically active under UV light . In addition, these LDH-based materials showed little adsorption towards cationic dyes and did not show good photocatalytic performance under visible lights.
Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), a polymeric material with an electron-rich property, has been shown to be a promising visible light photocatalyst due to its suitable bandgap (2.7 eV), good stability, ease of preparation in addition to the feature of being environmentally friendly [8,9,10,11]. However, g-C3N4 is limited by its low quantum efficiency and high recombination rate of excited charges [8,12]. To improve its photocatalytic properties, g-C3N4 has been combined with inorganic semiconductor materials to develop composite photocatalysts with improved properties [13,14,15]. Di et al. reported that a sphere-like g-C3N4/BiOI composite exhibited a higher photocatalytic activity in the photodegradation of dyes than pure BiOI, which was due to the enhanced electron-hole separation and broadened light absorption range . Jiang et al.  and Zhou et al.  both reported the heterojunction between g-C3N4 and TiO2, which showed effects on water pollution treatment, hydrogen production and an efficient photoreduction of CO2 to CO, respectively. Song and coworkers synthesized a g-C3N4(CN)-sensitized NaNbO3(NN) substrated II-type heterojunction, which not only exhibited narrower bandgap compared with NN but also displayed excellent photocatalytic activity for dyes and tetracycline degradation under visible-light irradiation . Lan et al. reported that the Zn-In mixed metal oxide/g-C3N4 (ZnIn-MMO/g-C3N4) nanohybrids showed stronger absorption in the visible region than the pristine ZnIn-MMO, by exhibiting enhanced photodegradation activity for Rhodamine B under visible-light irradiation in comparison with pure g-C3N4 and ZnIn-MMO . In addition, inter-electron transfer between g-C3N4 and ZnO heterogeneous junction was also reported and realized for photocatalytic degradation of pollutants [20,21,22,23]. Thus, the introduction of g-C3N4 to ZnO-LDH composite may tune the bandgap of ZnO-LDH composite and facilitate the separation of excited charges to improve the photocatalytic performance.
In this paper, we report a simple method for the design and preparation of a ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite with improved adsorption and photocatalytic properties towards both anionic and cationic dyes present in water.
All the chemicals used in this work such as urea, Zn(NO3)26H2O, Al(NO3)39H2O, NaOH, ZnO, methylene blue (C16H18ClN3S) and Orange II sodium salt (C16H11N2NaO4S) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich with analytical grade and used without further purification. Milli-Q water (ultrapure laboratory grade water) was utilized in all experiments.
The g-C3N4 used in this study was prepared by calcining urea at 550 °C for 3 h in an alumina crucible according to the literature . In brief, a given amount of urea was dried at 80 °C for 24 h, then calcined at 550 °C for 3 h. The heating rate of calcination was 2 °C/min. After cooling, the yellowish powder was collected and washed with 10% HNO3 solution and Milli-Q water three times by centrifugation.
The preparation of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite is illustrated in Scheme 1. First, 0.42 g of g-C3N4 and 2.80 g of NaOH were added to 40 mL of ethylene glycol (EG) under stirring. Second, 5.95 g of Zn(NO3)26H2O and 3.75 g of Al(NO3)39H2O (with a molar ratio of Zn/Al = 2:1) were added to another 40 mL of EG. Then, these two EG suspensions were combined under stirring. After 0.5 h, the suspension was transferred to a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave for solvothermal treatment at 120 °C for 24 h. Finally, the solids were collected and washed with ethanol two times and Milli-Q water three times by centrifugation and dried in an oven at 80 °C for 24 h. The yield of the solids was 2.88 g.
A ZnO-LDH sample was prepared via a solvothermal method with the same parameters as preparation of the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite without adding g-C3N4.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected on a Shimadzu diffractometer (XRD–6000, Tokyo, Japan) using the reflection mode with Cu Kα radiation at a scanning rate of 2°/min with 2θ ranging from 5° to 80°. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Kratos Analytical Ltd., Manchester, UK) measurements were performed on a Kratos Axis ULTRA X-ray photoelectron spectrometer with a 165 mm hemispherical electron energy analyzer and monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source (1486.6 eV) at 225 W (15 kV, 15 mA) with a charge neutralizer. The binding energies were calibrated using the C 1s peak at 284.6 eV. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan) of the samples were recorded on a Shimadzu IRAffinity-1 spectrophotometer. The morphologies and size of the samples were characterized by using scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL JSM-6460LA, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL JEM-1010, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM, JEOL JEM-2100, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The elemental analysis and mapping were done using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Light Scattering Electrophoresis (LSE, Malvern Instruments Malvern, Worcestershire, UK) in Nanosizer Nano ZS was used to analyze the zeta potentials of g-C3N4, ZnO-LDH, ZnO-LDH@C3N4 suspensions. The specific surface areas of the samples were calculated using the Brunauer-Emmette-Teller (BET, Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, Norcross, GA, USA) method based on the nitrogen adsorption isotherms measured on a Micromeritics TriStar II 3020 at liquid-nitrogen temperature. Thermogravimetric- differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA, Shimadzu DTG-60A analyser, SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan) was conducted in air from room temperature to 700 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. Diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-2600 spectrometer equipped with an integrating sphere ISR-3100 using BaSO4 as the reference. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were measured on a Fluorescence Spectrometer (FLS 920, Edinburgh Instruments, Edinburgh, UK). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measured in a 6 M KOH solution with sinusoidal ac perturbation of 5 mV over a frequency range from 0.1 to 1 × 106 Hz.
The adsorption of the dye pollutants was measured using a batch mode. For the adsorption of OrgII over the solid samples (including ZnO-LDH, ZnO-LDH@C3N4, and C3N4), 5 mg of a solid sample was added to 100 mL of an OrgII solution (the concentration was 50 mg/L) in the dark under stirring for 24 h to achieve sorption equilibrium. For the adsorption of MB, 100 mg of a solid sample was added to 100 mL MB solution (the concentration was 10 mg/L) in the dark under stirring for 1 h to achieve the adsorption equilibrium. After a given time interval, 5 mL of the aliquot was taken and filtrated through a membrane (0.45 µm). The OrgII and MB concentrations were analyzed using a Shimadzu UV-2600 UV-Vis spectrophotometer.
After achieving the adsorption equilibrium, the photocatalytic degradations of MB on the adsorbents were undertaken in an open thermostatic photoreactor under UV light and visible light, respectively. The UV-vis light resource was obtained from a 200 W mercury lamp. Visible-light irradiation was operated via adding a 450 nm cut-off filter on the mercury lamp. At given time intervals during irradiation, 5 mL of aliquots were extracted using a syringe and filtered through a membrane (0.45 µm). The concentration of MB in the solutions was analyzed using a Shimadzu UV-2600 UV-Vis spectrophotometer.
The species generated in the photocatalytic system were analyzed using tertbutyl alcohol (t-BuOH) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt (EDTA-2Na). In detail, t-BuOH or EDTA-2Na (1 mmol) was mixed with the MB solutions before adding ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite. Then the photocatalytic degradation of MB was performed in the thermostatic photoreactor under UV or visible-light irradiation with a similar process. The active species generated in the photocatalytic process could be detected through trapping by t-BuOH and EDTA-2Na .
The XRD patterns of g-C3N4, ZnO-LDH and ZnO-LDH@C3N4 are shown in Figure 1. Two diffraction peaks at 13.4° and 28.4° two theta can be seen from the g-C3N4 sample, attributing to the diffractions of the (100) and (002) planes of g-C3N4. The (100) peak of g-C3N4 represents the heptazine unit with an interplanar separation of 0.66 nm and (002) peak represents the graphitic-like layer with an interlayer distance of 0.31 nm . The XRD pattern of ZnO-LDH showed the presence of both ZnAl-LDH and ZnO . The strong peaks at 31.2°, 33.8°, and 35.6° two theta found in ZnO-LDH sample are indexed to the diffraction of the (100), (002) and (101) planes of ZnO (JCPDS No. 05-0664), indicating the formation of ZnO in the sample [26,27]. The diffraction peaks at 8.6° and 12.1° are ascribed to the diffractions of the (003) and (006) planes of ZnAl-LDH in the ZnO-LDH sample. The interlayer distance of ZnAl-LDH in the ZnO-LDH sample d(003) was 1.03 nm, which is larger than that of conventional carbonate intercalated LDH (0.73 nm), resulting from the intercalation of EG during solvothermal treatment [28,29,30]. The ZnO-LDH@C3N4 sample exhibited an XRD pattern similar to that of the ZnO-LDH sample. No characteristic diffraction peaks of g-C3N4 can be seen, probably due to the relatively weak intensity of the XRD peaks of g-C3N4.
Figure 2A shows the XPS survey spectrum of the g-C3N4 sample. It can be seen that the g-C3N4 sample synthesized in this work consisted of mainly C and N elements (the atomic concentration: 42.6% for C and 55.7% for N) with a small amount of oxygen (1.65%). Based on XPS data, the molar ratio of C to N is 0.76, closer to 0.75, suggesting the formula of g-C3N4. The small amount of oxygen in g-C3N4 may be caused by incomplete polymerization of urea. Figure 2B shows the peak deconvolution results of N 1s XPS spectrum of g-C3N4. Three peaks at 399.1, 400.4 and 401.6 eV, attributing to sp2-hybridized aromatic N bonded to carbon atoms (C=N–C), the tertiary N bonded to carbon atoms in the form of N–(C)3 and N–H side groups, respectively, can be seen [31,32]. A weak peak at 404.5 eV ascribing to the π-excitations is also seen . The high-resolution C 1s XPS spectrum of (Figure 2C) was deconvoluted into three peaks at 288.3, 286.4, and 284.8 eV, corresponding to sp2-bonded carbon (N–C=N), C–O and graphitic carbon (C–C), respectively [24,32]. The graphitic carbon C–C at 284.8 eV can usually be observed in carbon nitrides [16,33]. The XPS survey scan of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite is shown in Figure 2D. The presence of O, C, N, Zn and Al in the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 sample is clearly seen. The atomic concentrations for O/C/N/Zn/Al are 41.59/36.52/4.93/6.67/6.80 (%) from the survey of XPS, which represent the superficial atomic ratios. The high-resolution XPS spectra of N 1s, C 1s, Zn 2p, O 1s, and Al 2p are displayed in Figure 2E–I, respectively. The binding energies for N 1s and C 1s of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 in Figure 2E,F showed similar deconvolution peaks as pristine g-C3N4 but with lower energies compared to g-C3N4, suggesting the strong electrostatic interaction between ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4 [34,35]. The strong peaks of C–C and C–O were due to the existence of EG and CO32− in ZnO-LDH@C3N4. The binding energy values of Zn 2p3/2 and Zn 2p5/2 were fitted with 1022 and 1045 eV in Figure 2G. The high-resolution XPS spectra for O 1s and Al 2p in ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composites were also fitted in Figure 2H,I respectively. The XPS spectra for ZnO-LDH are illustrated in Figure S1. The binding energy of C 1s in ZnO-LDH only displayed one peak, and no N peaks were detected in ZnO-LDH. Thus, the XPS spectra confirm that layered g-C3N4 was loaded on ZnO-LDH successfully.
The surface charges of g-C3N4, ZnO-LDH and ZnO-LDH@C3N4 were measured by LSE. As listed in Table 1, the g-C3N4 possessed a positive charge of 20.2 mV attributed to the –NH2/NH functional groups at the heptazine rings generated from the incomplete polymerization of g-C3N4 . The uncondensed amine functional group and the edge cyano-group bring positive-charge characters for g-C3N4 [37,38]. During the synthetic process with ultrasonic treatment, g-C3N4 was unfolded and mixed well with NaOH in EG solution, and the pH of the mixture was changed to 13. The zeta potential of the g-C3N4 was changed into −23.1 mV, attributing to the hydroxyl groups’ adsorption on the g-C3N4 surface. Therefore, after adding Zn and Al ions, hydroxides generated and anchored onto g-C3N4. Further solvothermal treatment would reduce the aggregation of the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite. After the hybridization of g-C3N4 and ZnO-LDH (the weight ratio of g-C3N4 in ZnO-LDH@C3N4 is 14.6 wt %, calculated from experimental parameter and confirmed by TG-DTA, see Figure S2), the zeta potential of the composite was shifted to 32.9 mV because of the dominant content of ZnO-LDH (30.4 mV), as illustrated in Figure S3.
The morphologies of g-C3N4, ZnO-LDH, and ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite are presented in Figure 3. As shown in Figure 3A, TEM of g-C3N4 exhibits a flake-like morphology with irregular interstitial pores at the edge of the flake. The porous structure was generated due to releasing NH3 and CO2 gas during the thermal treatment of urea. The surface area of g-C3N4 was 128.6 m2g−1, much higher than the literature reports (Table 1) [36,39]. Such a high surface area of g-C3N4 might result from the irregular interstitial pore in g-C3N4. As shown in Figure S4a, bulk g-C3N4 exhibits overlapped wrinkles and the randomly aggregated g-C3N4 sheets. (The SEM of bulk g-C3N4 is given in Figure S4b, which also reveals the layered structure.) After hybridizing ZnO-LDH with C3N4, TEM image in Figure 3B shows the aggregates of the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite. Different from pristine ZnO-LDH (Figure S4c), ZnO-LDH nanoparticles grew on the g-C3N4 sheets in ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite, suggesting the good affinity between ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4. Figure 3C,D are the SEM images of the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 and ZnO-LDH composite, respectively. As seen in Figure 3C, ZnO nanoparticles were evenly distributed on the surface of LDH in ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite, which was similar to the characteristic of ZnO-LDH in Figure 3D. Different from ZnO-LDH, a gray veil can be distinguished from the SEM of ZnO-LDH@C3N4, which represents a covering layer of g-C3N4 on ZnO-LDH. The average particle sizes of ZnO in ZnO-LDH@C3N4 and ZnO-LDH are 3 nm and 5 nm respectively, which are coincident with the ZnO crystal sizes (Table 1) calculated from XRD. In the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite, the highly exfoliated g-C3N4 wrapped up ZnO-LDH particles tightly, which not only provided an intimate contact and cooperation between g-C3N4 and ZnO-LDH but also increased the surface area of the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 photocatalyst (152.5 m2g−1). The HRTEM image and the EDX for the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 are provided in Figure S5. The lattice spaces for the (100) and (101) planes of ZnO were measured to be 0.282 nm and 0.253 nm, in good agreement with d(100) and d(101), determined from XRD pattern (0.286 nm and 0.252 nm). The EDX analysis shows the presence of Zn, Al, O, C, and N with a Zn/Al atomic ratio of ~1, matching well with the ratio from XPS. The elemental mapping of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 is presented in Figure S6, exhibiting a uniform distribution of Zn, Al, O, C, and N in the composite. The textural structure of g-C3N4, ZnO-LDH and ZnO-LDH@C3N4 studied by N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm at 77 K are shown in Figure S7 and listed in Table 1. ZnO-LDH@C3N4 shows the highest surface area compared to g-C3N4 and ZnO-LDH, which facilitates the high contact between photocatalyst and dyes. Moreover, the intimate two-dimensional nanojunction between ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4 favours the photogenerated charge carriers’ transfer between ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4, which may be a key factor for photocatalytic activities of the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 photocatalyst.
Figure 4A exhibits the adsorption dynamics of OrgII on ZnO-LDH@C3N4. We performed four parallel experiments, so the error bars were also given. The concentration of OrgII firstly reduced from 100% to 85% in 1 h, followed by a moderate decrease in 23% during 9 h, and then slowed down gradually to 55% after 24 h. Thus, the equilibrium contact time was 24 h. Based on the adsorption profile, the adsorption of OrgII on ZnO-LDH@C3N4 may involve two steps. Firstly, OrgII molecules were quickly adsorbed on the surface of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 by electrostatic adsorption and π-π conjugation adsorption. Then the massive adsorption of OrgII dyes on ZnO-LDH@C3N4 happened through anionic exchange between the interlayered EG and OrgII, which gradually slowed down due to the establishment of the charge balance. The adsorption dynamics of OrgII on g-C3N4 and ZnO-LDH are presented in Figure S8. For g-C3N4, the absorption equilibrium of OrgII was established in 5 min, indicating the low adsorption of OrgII on g-C3N4. The adsorption of OrgII on g-C3N4 was ascribed to the quick π-π conjugation and electrostatic adsorption. ZnO-LDH exhibited a similar adsorption kinetic profile to ZnO-LDH@C3N4, suggesting that the adsorption of OrgII on ZnO-LDH@C3N4 was mainly attributed to ZnO-LDH. The inserted graph illustrates the adsorption capacities of ZnO-LDH@C3N4, g-C3N4, and ZnO-LDH. ZnO-LDH@C3N4 showed the highest OrgII adsorption amount with 431.4 mg/g compared to ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4 with 418.4 and 91.6 mg/g, respectively. This enhancement in adsorption was ascribed to the increased contact between dyes and catalyst derived from π-π conjugation and electrostatic interaction with g-C3N4 after the combination between g-C3N4 and ZnO-LDH.
FT-IR can be used to investigate the different situations and types of anionic functional groups between the layers of composites as reported in the literature [31,40]. Therefore, FT-IR was employed to determine the interaction between g-C3N4 and ZnO-LDH in the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite and its adsorption character. For all the samples, the broad absorption bands located in the range from 3600 to 3000 cm−1 are originated from stretching vibration of O-H, C-H, and N-H. These bonds are derived from the hydroxyl group of LDH layers, interlayer EG molecules (O-H and C-H) and uncondensed amino groups in g-C3N4 [35,41]. The FT-IR spectrum of pristine g-C3N4 (Figure 4Ba) shows the featured distinctive stretch modes of aromatic CN heterocycles at 1200–1700 cm−1 accompanied by the breathing mode of the bending vibration of heptazine rings at 800 cm−1, which is corresponding to the reported values . For ZnO-LDH (Figure 4Bb), the characteristic absorption bands of the intercalated molecules like EG are observed at 1500–1800 cm−1 and 900–1200 cm−1. Furthermore, the band at 650 cm−1 can be attributed to the Zn-O-H and Al-O-H stretching vibration in ZnO-LDH. For the composite ZnO-LDH@C3N4 (Figure 4Bc), a series of peaks observed from 1650 to 1300 cm−1 were attributed to the typical stretching modes of CN heterocycles and C=N stretching bonds, which were derived from g-C3N4 in this composite. It can be clearly seen that the main characteristic peaks for ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4 appear in ZnO-LDH@C3N4, suggesting the existence of both ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4 in the as-prepared composite. The FT-IR spectrum of OrgII (Figure 4Bd) exhibits a sharp peak at 1500 cm−1 which can be attributed to the absorption of C=C aromatic stretch. Moreover, several strong absorption bands around 1000–1250 cm−1 correspond to –SO3− vibrations in OrgII molecules. Furthermore, the bands around 700–850 cm−1 are ascribed to the aromatic C-H out-of-plane bending absorption from OrgII. After adsorption of OrgII, the peaks at 810 cm−1 assigned to the bending vibration of heptazine rings became sharper and changed into multi-peaks for ZnO-LDH@C3N4 (Figure 4Be), which could be induced by the molecular cooperation between adsorbed OrgII and g-C3N4 . The similarly strong absorption bands with OrgII in 1000–1500 cm−1 and 700–850 cm−1 for ZnO-LDH@C3N4 (Figure 4Be) indicate that OrgII has successfully intercalated into the LDH layers after adsorption. (The change patterns of FT-IR spectra along with the adsorption time were given in Figure S9.) The successful intercalation of OrgII into LDH was also demonstrated by the shifting XRD pattern in our previous report .
As shown in Figure 5a, adsorption equilibrium of MB on the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite was established in 20 min, and the adsorption capacity of MB on the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite was 8.0 mg/g, which was much lower than the adsorption capacity for OrgII (431.4 mg/g). The lower adsorption capacity for MB was caused by the positive charges of MB and ZnO-LDH@C3N4. Different from adsorption of anionic OrgII, MB dye was adsorbed on ZnO-LDH@C3N4 mainly via the π-π conjugation adsorption instead of electrostatic attraction and ion-exchanged intercalation adsorption. The π-π conjugation adsorption was mainly contributed to the electron-rich properties of g-C3N4. In addition, the hydrophobicity of C3N4 may also help MB adsorption on ZnO-LDH@C3N4. Though the adsorption capacity of MB was low, 80% of MB in solution was absorbed on the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite. Compared with g-C3N4, ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite showed better MB adsorption, ascribing to high surface area of the composite and the uniform g-C3N4 distribution on ZnO-LDH as well as intimate contact between MB and g-C3N4. The π-π conjugation adsorption was achieved from the exposure of CN heterocycles on g-C3N4. Polymeric g-C3N4 is hydrophobic, which tends to agglomerate in aqueous solution. After hybridizing with ZnO-LDH, g-C3N4 was unfolded in ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite with more exposure of CN heterocycles. The hydrophilic property of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 promised the intimate contact between catalyst and MB. Therefore, the adsorption amount of MB was superior for ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite. In contrast, there was neglected adsorption of MB for ZnO and ZnO-LDH.
After saturated adsorption of MB, the photocatalytic degradation of MB dyes on commercial ZnO, ZnO-LDH, g-C3N4, and ZnO-LDH@C3N4 was undertaken under UV and visible-light irradiation. As shown in Figure 5a, ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite removed all of the MB in the water after 1 h UV irradiation. A total of 55.0% of MB was removed by g-C3N4, and 21.0% of MB was removed by ZnO-LDH. ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite showed better photocatalytic performance compared to C3N4 and ZnO-LDH. However, the commercial ZnO also removed 100% of MB in the water in 20 min under UV irradiation. Interestingly, as shown in Figure 5b, 100% of MB was also removed by the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite in 4 h under visible-light irradiation; on the contrary, only 27.2% of MB could be degraded on commercial ZnO photocatalyst. The low photocatalytic activity of commercial ZnO under the visible light was ascribed to its wide bandgap, which cannot be excited upon visible-light irradiation. The removal rate of MB over ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4 under visible-light irradiation was 15.3% and 64.1% respectively. The better photocatalytic performance of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite under UV or visible light was ascribed to its narrower bandgap, high surface area and increased contact surface area between MB and the composite. As mentioned in MB adsorption, a large amount of MB was absorbed on the surface of ZnO-LDH@C3N4; the intimate contact between MB and photocatalyst shortened the mass transfer, which would lead to the dramatic improvement in catalytic performance. Moreover, a combination of ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4 reduced the bandgap of the composite, which increased the photon utilization efficiency. Most importantly, the heterojunction between ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4 could facilitate the transfer of excited photoelectrons during the photocatalytic process, which increased the photocatalytic effect fundamentally. Moreover, after the reaction, the color of the sediment changed back to the original yellowish (the color after adsorption of MB was blue), suggesting MB has been fully decomposed.
The photocatalytic degradation kinetics of MB on the photocatalysts were investigated and shown in Figure 5c. The photocatalytic profile of MB on ZnO-LDH@C3N4 followed pseudo-first-order kinetics plot by the equation:
where k is the pseudo-first-order rate constant, C0 and C are the MB concentration in solution at times 0 and t, respectively.
After fitting, k of commercial ZnO, ZnO-LDH, g-C3N4 and ZnO-LDH@C3N4 in Table 1 were 0.0775, 0.0378, 0.185, and 0.487 min−1, respectively. The value of k gives an indication of the activity of the photocatalyst . ZnO-LDH@C3N4 had the highest rate constant among all the photocatalysts under visible-light irradiation, almost seven times as high as ZnO. The highest rate constant of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 further demonstrated the better photocatalytic performance of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 than that of commercial ZnO. The reusability of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 was further tested. As shown in Figure S10, the removal rate can still be 90% at the fifth cycle.
UV-vis diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS) was used to test the light-harvesting ability of ZnO, g-C3N4, ZnO-LDH and ZnO-LDH@C3N4 samples. As shown in Figure 5d, sharp absorption edges for all samples were in the range of 380~450 nm. The bandgap can be inferred from the UV-vis absorption measurements. The bandgaps of ZnO, g-C3N4, ZnO-LDH and ZnO-LDH@C3N4 were calculated to be 3.20, 2.72, 3.08 and 3.06 eV, respectively. With the existence of g-C3N4, we expected that the bandgap of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 would be tuned to the lower bandgap. However, the bandgap of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 was 3.06 eV, slightly lower than that of ZnO-LDH (3.08 eV) instead of being close to that of g-C3N4 (2.72 eV). No change in the bandgap of the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite may be due to the low content of g-C3N4. The other reason should be that during the solvothermal treatment process, the g-C3N4 was unfolded and covered on the ZnO-LDH. Therefore, the strong quantum confinement effect (QCE) derived from the highly extended g-C3N4 increased the bandgap of g-C3N4 simultaneously . PL spectroscopy was used to investigate the separation efficiency of photoexcited electron-hole pairs [14,25]. All the samples were excited at 360 nm, and the emission spectra were recorded in a range between 380 and 550 nm. As shown in Figure 5e, the g-C3N4 had the highest emission peak at 470 nm. The emission peak at 470 nm was ascribed to the band-band PL phenomenon with the energy of light approximately equal to the bandgap energy of g-C3N4. This high intensive emission was attributed to the direct recombination of excitons . Compared to g-C3N4, the emission intensity of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 was much lower, suggesting that their e-h+ pair recombination rate was much lower. The strong separation of charge carriers resulted in the potentially higher photocatalytic activity for ZnO-LDH@C3N4. The charge transport process occurs in photocatalyst under dark condition, which directly reflects its capacity to shuttle and convey charge carriers to the targeted reactive sites . Thus, to deeply understand the charge transport behaviour of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 in the absence of light excitation, EIS measurements were carried out under dark condition. Figure 5f displayed the EIS Nyquist plots of all the samples. As already known, the arc radius on the EIS Nyquist plot reflects the reaction rate on the surface of the electrode. The smaller the arc radius, the more effective the separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs, and the higher the efficiency of charge immigration across the electrode-electrolyte interface [20,21,44]. Among all the samples, ZnO-LDH@C3N4 showed the smallest diameter for arc radius, suggesting its lowest resistance for interfacial charge transfer from the electrode to electrolyte molecules. Therefore, EIS measurements were consistent with PL data, demonstrating that the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 had lower resistance than other samples and made the separation and immigration of photogenerated charges more efficient, indicating the high photocatalytic activity for ZnO-LDH@C3N4.
As already known, detection of the main oxidative species in the photocatalytic process is a significant tool to reveal the photocatalytic mechanism. The active species generated during the photocatalytic process can be detected through trapping by tertbutyl alcohol (t-BuOH) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt (EDTA-2Na) . t-BuOH can be the scavenger for radicals like hydroxyl and superoxide; EDTA-2Na is the scavenger for holes. As shown in Figure 6A, in the ZnO-LDH@C3N4 system, the MB concentration decreased dramatically upon UV irradiation without adding trapping chemicals. However, the addition of t-BuOH only resulted in a small change in the photocatalytic degradation of MB. On the contrary, the photocatalytic activity of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 was greatly suppressed by the addition of EDTA-2Na. The experiment results indicated that holes were the main oxidative species when the photocatalyst was under UV irradiation. When the photocatalytic reaction was under visible-light irradiation, the situation was reversed. As shown in Figure 6B, the addition of t-BuOH suppressed the photocatalytic degradation compared to the addition of scavenger EDTA-2Na. The experiment result suggested that the radicals were the main oxidative species when photocatalytic degradation was processed under visible irradiation.
Through the adsorption and photocatalytic performance results, we proposed the following adsorption and photocatalytic mechanism shown in Figure 7. As shown in Figure 7, ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composites were mixed with OrgII solution and then OrgII was absorbed on the surface of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composites via electrostatic interaction and π-π conjugation adsorption and further intercalated into ZnO-LDH via layered adsorption including ion exchange. For cationic MB dye, MB was first adsorbed on the surface of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 by π-π conjugation. Upon UV irradiation, ZnO-LDH could be excited to produce photogenerated electron-hole pairs. Since the valence band (VB) position of ZnO-LDH is lower than the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of g-C3N4, the photogenerated holes on ZnO-LDH could directly transfer to g-C3N4 . g-C3N4 is relatively stable with holding holes. The g-C3N4 with holes would accept electrons from MB degradation and then return to the ground state. Upon visible-light irradiation, g-C3N4 instead of ZnO-LDH absorbed visible light to induce π-π* transition, transporting the excited-state electrons from HOMO to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). The LUMO potential of g-C3N4 is more negative than the conduction band (CB) edge of ZnO-LDH, due to the comparable energy difference between the CB of ZnO-LDH and g-C3N4; there is a strong thermodynamic driving force for electron transfer from excited g-C3N4 to ZnO-LDH . The electrons would subsequently transfer to the surface of ZnO-LDH@C3N4 to react with water and oxygen by generating superoxide and hydroxyl radicals. The radicals can subsequently oxidize the MB into CO2 and H2O.
The ZnO-LDH@C3N4 composite was synthesized via the facile solvothermal method in this work. The introduction of g-C3N4 on ZnO-LDH significantly improved the adsorption and photocatalytic activities of ZnO-LDH@C3N4. For OrgII, ZnO-LDH@C3N4 showed higher adsorption capacity with three synergetic steps including electrostatic and π-π conjugation adsorption followed by ion exchange. Besides, ZnO-LDH@C3N4 exhibited substantial adsorption of cationic methylene blue (MB) dye and high photocatalytic activities in MB removal under UV and visible light. Moreover, ZnO-LDH@C3N4 showed stable photocatalytic activities for MB removal in five cycles and 90% of MB was removed at the fifth cycle. The enhanced performance in photocatalytic degradation of MB under UV and visible-light irradiation were induced by the high separation efficiency of photogenerated charges. This work demonstrated that an attractive ternary hybridization of LDH, ZnO and g-C3N4 could launch new research on a highly active photocatalytic adsorbent for environmental and energetic applications.
We appreciate access to the facilities and the scientific and technical assistance of the Australia Microscopy and Microanalysis Research Facility at the Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Queensland. We are also grateful for the support from the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC) for Luhong’s Ph.D. study (No. 201206370005).
The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/9/11/927/s1.
All the authors have been collaborating with each other to obtain a high-quality research work. Luhong Zhang and Li Li conceived and designed the experiments; Luhong Zhang performed the adsorption and photocatalytic degradation experiments; Luhong Zhang and Li Li analyzed the data; Luhong Zhang wrote the paper; Xiaoming Sun obtained the EIS data and analyzed the XPS spectra together with Luhong Zhang; Peng Liu was responsible for the TG-DTA data and SEM images of samples; Dongfang Yang contributed the microstructural characterization of samples in TEM/HRTEM and EDX; Luhong Zhang, Li Li and Xiusong Zhao contributed the revision of the paper; Xiusong Zhao provided and optimized the equipment.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.