Until this report, genes associated with the synthesis of the
C. diphtheriae siderophore had not been described. We report here the identification of the
ciu gene cluster, which encodes products involved in the transport (CiuABCD) and synthesis (CiuE) of the major
C. diphtheriae siderophore. The predicted product of
ciuE is similar to the aerobactin biosynthesis enzymes IucC and IucA, and mutations in
ciuE greatly reduce siderophore production, which suggests that CiuE has a role in siderophore synthesis. Based on what is known regarding the synthesis of bacterial siderophores and, more specifically, those siderophores that utilize enzymes that share similarity with the IucC and IucA-like proteins (
6,
11,
20,
21), it seems likely that additional enzymes are involved in the production of the
C. diphtheriae siderophore. Genes that are predicted to encode siderophore biosynthetic enzymes were not identified adjacent to the
ciu gene cluster, nor was any clustering of siderophore biosynthetic genes identified in the DRTA study (
18), with the exception of the
sid genes. The
sid genes, however, do not appear to be associated with the synthesis of a siderophore based on the findings from the previous report (
18) and from this study, in which we showed that the levels of siderophore production in a
ciuE sidA double mutant were similar to those of the
ciuE single mutant. It is possible, nevertheless, that the
sid genes may be involved in siderophore production under other conditions not examined in these studies. Since the DRTA system did not identify all DtxR binding sites on the
C. diphtheriae chromosome (for example, the DtxR-regulated
ciu or
irp6 promoters were not identified using DRTA), it is possible that additional DtxR- and iron-regulated genes involved in siderophore synthesis may be present on the chromosome. These additional genes are likely to be associated with the synthesis of a precursor siderophore molecule, since IucC/IucA-like proteins are involved in the final steps of siderophore synthesis (
20,
21).
One of the more unusual features of
ciuE is that it appears to be a fusion of two
iucC/
iucA-like genes. The predicted product of
ciuE shows similar relatedness to both IucC and IucA in both halves of the protein, and CiuE sequences do not exhibit significantly higher amino acid similarity to either IucC or IucA in either the N-terminal region or C-terminal section. While CiuE appears to be a fusion protein, it remains to be determined if the protein has two distinct enzymatic activities within a single peptide. For example, does the N-terminal region possess an IucC-like function while the C-terminal portion has an IucA-like activity? Another unusual feature of this siderophore system is that while CiuE has homology to enzymes involved in the synthesis of aerobactin, a hydroxamate siderophore, the
C. diphtheriae siderophore gives a negative result in tests for the hydroxamate-type siderophores (
27). Similar observations have been made in studies with siderophores produced by
Bacillus anthracis (
6) and
Legionella pneumophila (
15,
19). Synthesis of the siderophore anthrachelin in
B. anthracis appears to require two genes that share homology to
iucC and
iucA, yet anthrachelin gives a negative result in the Csaky test for hydroxamates. The predicted product of the
frgA gene in
L. pneumophila is an IucC/IucA homolog, and mutations in
frgA resulted in impaired intracellular growth (
15). Although a siderophore has not been specifically associated with
frgA, L. pneumophila does not appear to produce a hydroxamate-type siderophore (
15,
19). Interestingly, the
frgA gene is not clustered with any other siderophore biosynthetic genes, a situation that is similar to what we have observed with
ciuE in
C. diphtheriae. The structures for the siderophores in
B. anthracis and
L. pneumophila have not been determined.
Although the
C. diphtheriae ciuE mutants exhibited reduced siderophore production, a low level of iron chelating activity was detected in the C7 and 1737
ciuE mutants grown under low-iron conditions, and this activity was higher than that seen in iron-replete cultures. The source of this activity in low-iron cultures is not known but may be caused by a siderophore precursor or by some other weak iron-chelating compound secreted under low-iron conditions. It is also possible that certain metabolites that are secreted under low-iron conditions, such as the previously described coproporphyrin III (
27), may interfere with the CAS assay or function as weak chelators.
The proximity of the ciuABCD transport genes to ciuE initially suggested to us that this transport system might be involved in aerobactin uptake, since the predicted product of ciuE is similar to aerobactin biosynthetic enzymes. Surprisingly, however, we showed that a ciuA mutant utilized aerobactin as an iron source, while a mutation in the C7 irp6A gene abolished aerobactin utilization. Theses findings suggest that the C7 Irp6 transporter is needed for the utilization of aerobactin iron, while the CiuABCD transport system is involved in the transport of the major C. diphtheriae siderophore and is not required for aerobactin uptake. The 1737 clinical isolate was unable to use aerobactin as an iron source, and while it is not known why the 1737 and C7 strains differ in their abilities to use aerobactin iron, we have noted several amino acid differences between the predicted irp6 gene products for 1737 and C7. It is possible that differences in the amino acid sequence in the irp6 gene products between C7 and 1737 may be responsible for their differences in the ability to use aerobactin iron.
A previous study suggested that specific mutant alleles in the
irp6 operon were responsible for the iron transport defect in the HC1 (
irp6A), HC4 (
irp6C), and HC5 (
irp6B. C. diphtheriae mutants (
26). While these mutants are chemically derived and likely carry mutations outside the
irp6 operon, it was shown, nevertheless, that clones carrying the relevant
irp6 gene could complement the mutant phenotype of the HC strains (
26). (Complementation of the defect in HC1 by clones carrying the
irp6A gene has also been done in our laboratory [Schmitt, unpublished]). In this study, we constructed a defined deletion in the
irp6A gene and also an
irp6A point mutant, C7A-1, that carried the identical mutation as that present in the HC1
irp6A gene. Analysis of the site-directed
irp6A mutant strains revealed that they were unaffected in iron transport and in the utilization of the
C. diphtheriae siderophore as an iron source. The
irp6A mutants also regulated siderophore synthesis in a manner similar to that of the wild-type strain (Schmitt, unpublished). The
irp6A gene was also not required for growth in low-iron medium in the clinical strain, 1737, but mutations in the C7
irp6A gene resulted in reduced growth relative to the parent strain, indicating that the
irp6A gene is required for normal growth in low-iron medium in the C7 strain. However, mutations in the C7
irp6A gene do not result in the severe growth defect or iron uptake deficiency seen with the HC1 strain. These findings indicate that the severe growth and iron uptake phenotype in HC1 cannot be attributed solely to the point mutation in
irp6A, and they suggest that additional mutations in the HC1 chromosome contribute to the severe growth defect in this strain.
The
ciuA mutation in C7 and 1737 resulted in a severe defect in iron uptake and in the ability to use the
C. diphtheriae siderophore as an iron source, which strongly suggests that the CiuA protein has an important role in the transport of the siderophore. We also noted a marked difference in the iron uptake activity between the
ciuE and
ciuA mutant strains, and we suspect this is largely a result of differences in siderophore production. Although the
ciuA mutant produces siderophore at wild-type levels, it is unable to utilize the siderophore as an iron source, and therefore the siderophore activity present in the culture supernatant of the
ciuA mutant is sequestering much of the available iron and is potentially inhibiting iron uptake by iron transport systems that are distinct from the
ciu system. Recent studies have revealed that
C. diphtheriae has several putative ABC iron transporters, including
irp6 (
26),
frg (
18),
irp1 (
36), and others identified from the genome sequence (
7), and it is almost certain that alternative iron uptake systems are functioning to transport iron in the
ciu mutants. This is supported by the observation that the
ciu mutants, while exhibiting diminished growth in low-iron medium relative to wild type, are still able to grow to relatively high densities, which suggests that additional systems involved in iron uptake are active in the absence of the
ciu system. It is likely that mutations in multiple iron transporters are needed to fully abolish growth of
C. diphtheriae under low-iron conditions.
Iron uptake through these alternate iron transporters would be unaffected in the ciuE mutants, since these mutants do not produce siderophore. The ciuE mutant shows transport activity comparable to wild type only in the unsupplemented PGTH medium (Fig. ). In the presence of EDDA, the ciuE mutant shows a significant decrease in iron uptake relative to that of the wild-type strain (Fig. ). Since ciuE mutants do not produce siderophore, the iron transport that is observed presumably occurs by a siderophore-independent mechanism. It is not known which iron uptake systems (or how many) have a role in iron transport in the absence of siderophore. Future studies are needed to determine the role of the various iron transport systems in C. diphtheriae.