PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of onclettLink to Publisher's site
 
Oncol Lett. 2017 April; 13(4): 2649–2655.
Published online 2017 February 28. doi:  10.3892/ol.2017.5787
PMCID: PMC5403482

Lentivirus-mediated RNA interference of tripartite motif 68 inhibits the proliferation of colorectal cancer cell lines SW1116 and HCT116 in vitro

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide. Previous studies have revealed that certain members of tripartite motif (TRIM) proteins are involved in carcin ogenesis regulation, but little is known about the function of TRIM68 in human colorectal cancer. To investigate the role of TRIM68 in colorectal cancer SW1116 and HCT116 cell lines, the present study conducted lentivirus-mediated knockdown against TRIM68 and demonstrated that depletion of TRIM68 notably inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation and colony formation ability. Cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase and cycle accumulation in sub-G1 phase provided evidence that TRIM68 may participate in the regulation of colorectal cancer tumorigenesis. The results revealed the significant role of TRIM68 in regulating colorectal cancer cell mitosis and indicated that TRIM68 may be a promising therapeutic target.

Keywords: lentivirus, RNA interference, tripartite motif containing 68, proliferation, colorectal cancer

Introduction

Malignant colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the most devastating types of cancer worldwide. It is the second leading cause of cancer-associated mortality in Europe and the USA (1,2). CRC causes 500,000 mortalities per year worldwide (3), and it causes mortality in 1/3 of patients (4). Despite improvement in CRC therapy, the disease-specific mortality remains high due to distant metastases and high recurrence rates (5,6). Therefore, novel promising therapeutic molecules are urgently required.

Tripartite motif-containing (TRIM) proteins are recognized as a subfamily of E3 ubiquitin ligases as they contain a really interesting new gene (RING) finger domain (7). It is well known that ubiquitylation is an important type of post-translational modification in eukaryotic cells for selective elimination of short-lived proteins, which also have critical roles in human cancer (8). To date at least 76 known TRIM proteins have been identified and studied (9), and it has been demonstrated that TRIM family proteins are involved in a broad range of biological processes including cell growth, apoptosis, transcriptional regulation and tumorigenesis (1021). Additionally, previous studies have indicated that TRIM members regulate carcinogenesis, providing positive or negative effects on tumor progression and oncogenesis regulation. Upregulated expression levels of TRIM24 (15,22), TRIM25 (23), TRIM27 (24), TRIM28 (25), TRIM29 (26), TRIM31 (27) and TRIM32 (28) can be observed in multiple types of cancer, including breast, ovarian, lung, bladder, colon and gastric cancer and myeloma (9). Notably gene deletion and reduced expression of TRIM8 (29,30), TRIM13 (31,32), TRIM33 (33,34) and TRIM40 (35) were observed in cancer cells. A number of studies have attempted to elucidate the biological role of TRIM68 in the regulation of cancer; a study by Miyajima et al (36) found that the TRIM68 protein is significantly upregulated in human prostate cancer.

The present study sought to additionally investigate the expression patterns of TRIM68 in colorectal cancer cells by performing the RNA interference (RNAi) technique. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time evidence has been provided that downregulated expression of TRIM68 suppresses the metastasis properties of colorectal cancer cells and induces cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase. The present study shed light on the promising therapeutic value of TRIM68 against human colorectal carcinoma for future clinical applications.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Human embryonic kidney HEK293T cells and colorectal cancer HCT116 and SW1116 cell lines were obtained from the Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China). HCT116 and SW1116 cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (cat. no. SH30809.01B+; Hyclone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA). HEK293T cells were cultivated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; cat. no. SH30243.01B+; Hyclone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences). RPMI-1640 and DMEM were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (cat. no. S1810; Biowest, Riverside, MO, USA) and incubated at 37°C, in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.

Lentiviral packaging and virus construction

A short hairpin RNA (shRNA) candidate sequence against the human TRIM68 gene (NCBI reference sequence, NM_01,8073.6) was screened to be the optimal sequence (5′-CAGAGTATTGTATGGGAGTTTCTCGAGAAACTCCCATACAATACTCTGTTTTT-3′, sequence 1). Concurrently the negative control short hairpin RNA (5′-GCGGAGGGTTTGAAAGAATATCTCGAGATATTCTTTCAAACCCTCCGCTTTTTT-3′) was scrambled. The stem-loop-stem oligos (shRNAs) were synthesized, annealed, and ligated into the NheI/PacI-linearized shRNA vector pFH-L (Shanghai Hollybio Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). DNA sequencing was performed to assess that the lentiviral shRNA expressing vectors were constructed without mismatched sequences. The generated plasmids were termed pFH-L-shTRIM68 and pFH-L-shCon.

HEK293T cells (1.0×106) were inoculated into 10 cm dishes and cultured for 24 h at 37°C to reach >80% confluence. The medium was replaced with serum-free DMEM 2 h prior to transfection. The plasmids, consisting of 10 µg of pFH-L-shTRIM68 or pFH-L-shCon, 7.5 µg of pHelper plasmids pVSVG-I and 5 µg of pCMVΔR8.92 (Shanghai Hollybio Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), were added to the cells with a mixture of 0.95 ml Opti-MEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham MA, USA) and 0.05 ml Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). This mixture was then incubated for 8 h prior to replacing the medium with 10 ml of complete DMEM (supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum).

Lentiviral particles were harvested 96 h subsequent to transfection. HCT116 and SW1116 cells were cultivated in 6-well plates at a density of 5×104 cells/well and inoculated with recombinant lentiviruses (Lv-shCon or Lv-shTRIM68, Shanghai Hollybio Co., Ltd.) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 30. The infection efficiency was determined by counting the numbers of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing cells by fluorescence microscopy.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) to monitor the downregulation efficiency of constructed lentivirus

Human colorectal cancer HCT116 or SW1116 cell lines were co-cultured with lentiviruses for 5 or 7 days, respectively. Reverse transcription was performed using quantitative RT-PCR kits (cat. no. kR103; Tiangen Biotech Co., Beijing, China). The mRNA expression level with or without vector transfection was detected, with β-actin acting as a normalizing control. The primers (5′ to 3′) used for gene expression analysis were designed using NCBI Primer-BLAST and presented as follows: TRIM68 forward, 5′-GGAGCAAATCTTGGAGCTTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGCACACGTTTTCTGTCCTC-3′; β-actin forward, 5′-GTGGACATCCGCAAAGAC-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAAGGGTGTAACGCAACTA-3′. Infected colorectal cells were trypsinized and harvested 5 days subsequent to transduction. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. In total, 1 mg of total RNA was used to synthesize the first strand of cDNA using 200 U/ml SuperScript II RT (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Subsequently, 2 step RT-qPCR reactions were performed using the BioRad Connect Real-Time PCR platform (Bio-Rad Technologies, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA), which consisted of: Cycle 1 (1x), 95°C, 1 min; and cycle 2 with 40 repeated cycles, 95°C, 5 sec and 60°C, 20 sec. Absorbance data were collected at the end of every extension (60°C) and graphed using ABI 7500 Software v2.0.6 (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). The qPCR data were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCq method (51).

Western blot analysis

Prior to applying western blot analysis, SW1116 cells were subcultured and infected at 37°C with recombinant lentiviruses for 4 days. The cells were rinsed with cold PBS twice, and tsubsequently lysed in cell lysis buffer containing 10 mM EDTA, 4% SDS, 10% glycine in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8) (Shanghai Hollybio Co., Ltd.). Equal amounts of protein samples (60 µg) were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE in a Tris/HCl buffer (pH 7.4) and electrotransferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) at 300 mA for 1.5 h. The membrane was blocked for 1 h in PBST buffer (PBS pH 7.4, 0.05% Triton-100) containing 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin at room temperature. The membrane was then probed with a rabbit anti-TRIM68 antibody (dilution, 1:500; cat. no. AP17177b; Abgent Biotech Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) and rabbit anti-GAPDH antibody simultaneously (dilution, 1:3,000; cat. no. 10494-1-AP; Proteintech Group, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) overnight at 4°C, followed by 5 washes with PBST. Blots were then incubated with a secondary goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (dilution, 1:5,000; cat. no. SC-2054; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) for 2 h at room temperature. The blots were developed using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Applygen Technologies, Inc., Beijing, China) in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol.

Cell proliferation assay and plate colony formation assay

HCT116 cells and SW1116 cells were exponentially cultured and infected with constructed lentiviruses at a MOI of 30 for 96 h. Transfected cells were washed and re-seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 2,500 per well for HCT116 cells and 2,000 per well for SW1116 cells. Each well was treated with MTT solution dissolved in 10% SDS, 5% isopropanol and 0.01 M HCl for 10 min at 37°C, and the formazan crystals were solubilized with 100 ml of 10% SDS in 0.01 M HCl for 24 h. Cell viability was determined by measuring absorbance at a wavelength of 595 nm under a microplate reader. Cell count and optical density readings using AxioVision 4.7 microscopy software (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) were performed daily for 5 days.

Colony formation assays were performed by inoculating HCT116 and SW1116 cells into 6-well plates at the end of 96 h of lentivirus infection. In total, 500 cells per well of transfected HCT116 cells and 300 cells per well of SW1116 cells were cultured for 8 days. Colony cells were fixed with methanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The number of colonies containing >50 cells was manually counted by microscopy (LSM710; Carl Zeiss AG).

Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry

Cell cycle was analyzed by flow cytometry. Prior to cell cycle analysis, HCT116 cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (cat. no. SH30809.01B+; Hyclone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and infected with the lentivirus for 5 days. Cells were harvested and washed twice in PBS, then fixed in 75% alcohol overnight at 4°C for permeabilisation. The next day, the cells were washed twice by cold PBS and resuspended in 1 ml PBS with 100 mg RNase A (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) for 30 min at 37°C. The cells suspended in 1 ml PBS and 100 mg propidium iodide (cat. no. 81845; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) prior to lucifugal incubation at 37°C for 30 min. Samples were then analyzed on a FACS machine (Beckman, CA, USA) and detected in red fluorescence excitation with 20,000 counted.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The significant differences between groups were compared using Student's t-test, and data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of 3 independent experiments. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Identification of recombinant lentiviral vectors for TRIM68 by GFP visualization

To investigate the biological role of TRIM68 in colorectal cancers, the present study performed a loss-of-function assay by RNAi: Control lentiviruses (Lv-shCon) and specific TRIM68-targeting lentiviruses (Lv-shTRIM68) were constructed. The most efficient type of shRNA expression cassette was selected and constructed into TRIM68-silencing lentiviral vector, and co-cultured with colorectal cancer cells (shTRIM68). Concurrently, negative blank controls of cells were cultured without lentiviral infection (Con). GFP expression in colorectal cancer cells was observed by fluorescent microscopy 96 h subsequent to infection. As shown in Fig. 1A, >80% of SW1116 or HCT116 cells were GFP positive, indicating infection efficacy. To determine the silencing efficiency, the expression level of TRIM68 mRNA was detected by RT-qPCR. In Fig. 1B and C, the non-silencing lentivirus encoded by the irrelevant sequence had a negligible effect on TRIM68 expression, but the TRIM68-silencing lentivirus significantly downregulated the mRNA expression by 72.3% in the SW1116 group (P=0.000) and by 68.9% in the HCT116 group (P=0.001). In parallel, the protein level was monitored by western blot analysis (Fig. 1D), providing evidence that the protein expression of TRIM68 was noticeably depleted, while control groups (shCon) maintained a similar expression level.

Figure 1.
Lentivirus infection and knockdown efficiency of SMMC-7721 cells. (A) Bright field and fluorescence photomicrographs subsequent to transduction of (a) HCT116 and (b) SW1116 cells in Con, shCon and shTRIM68 groups, respectively. Relative mRNA expression ...

The results of the present study demonstrate that the lentiviruses constructed provide knockdown efficiency and provide an efficient tool to investigate the knockdown effect of TRIM68 in colorectal cancer cells in vitro.

Depletion of TRIM68 represses cell proliferation and colony formation ability of colorectal cancer cells in vitro

Cell proliferation was monitored for 5 days subsequent to colorectal cancer HCT116 or SW1116 cells being infected with the shTRIM68 lentivirus. Solubilized formazan crystals were detected to evaluate cell viability in this assay. It was observed that cells infected with shCon lentivirus exhibited no alteration in cell proliferation and viability (Fig. 2; shCon vs. Con), while a marked inhibition in TRIM68 inhibition group was observed on day 5 compared to non-infected cells (shTRIM68 vs. Con; P=0.000), suggesting that knockdown of TRIM68 led to repressed cancer cell proliferation.

Figure 2.
TRIM68 silencing inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation. The solubilized formazan crystal was examined in terms of optical density at absorbance 595 nm. The viabilities of (A) HCT1116 cells and (B) SW1116 cells were determined respectively in Con, ...

Malignant cancer cells possess a strong ability to form colonies in vitro (37). In the present assay, the colony of HCT116 and SW1116 cells was markedly smaller when infected with TRIM68-silencing lentivirus (Fig. 3A and B) and the respective colony numbers were significantly lower compared with the control cells (Fig. 3C and D, shTRIM68 vs. shCon; P=0.001). The downregulation of TRIM68 significantly suppressed the colony formation capability of colorectal cancer cells.

Figure 3.
Downregulated expression of TRIM68 inhibits the colony formation ability of colorectal cancer cells. The colony formation of (A) HCT116 cells and (B) SW1116 cells in Con, shCon and shTRIM68 groups was detected in crystal violet under microscopy and bright ...

The present study provided evidence that knockdown of TRIM68 by RNAi markedly suppresses the proliferation and colony formation ability of colorectal cancer cells in vitro.

TRIM68 silencing induces cell cycle arrest

To determine whether the decreased cell proliferation induced by knockdown of TRIM68 was due to cell cycle arrest, PI staining and flow cytometric analysis was performed. Fig. 4 shows that the G0/G1-phase DNA content in TRIM68-silenced cells (61.20%) was significantly increased compared with that in non-silenced cells (53.53%; P=0.001). In addition, the S phase DNA content in the shTRIM68 group (22.85%) was statistically decreased compared with that in the shCon group (29.12%; P=0.000), which indicated that the cell cycle of TRIM68-silenced cells was arrested in the G0/G1 phase. These findings are in agreement with the cell growth inhibition observed in the proliferation assay, which suggests that the TRIM68 gene modulates the growth of human colorectal cancer cell via cell cycle control. The population of sub-G1 infected HCT116 cells was analyzed. Marked accumulation of sub-G1 group cells (Fig. 4C) indicated apoptosis was proceeding when TRIM68 was absent, leading to inhibited cell proliferation and colony formation reduction.

Figure 4.
TRIM68 depletion arrests cell cycle progression. (A) Cell cycle distribution of HCT116 cells was determined by flow cytometry in Con, shCon and shTRIM68 groups, respectively. (B) The percentage of cells at the stages of G0/G1, S and G2/M. (C) Significant ...

Discussion

The present study has demonstrated that TRIM68 acts as a potential tumor growth promoter in colorectal cancer. TRIM68 expression was observed to be positively associated with cancer cell proliferation and colony formation ability. More significantly, cancer cell cycle arrest by down-regulating endogenous expression of TRIM68 indicated that TRIM68 might be a promising therapeutic target for colorectal cancer. RNAi has been utilized as an efficient therapeutic tool against human malignant carcinomas in previous decades (3840), and lentivirus therapy is the most effective type of vehicle for gene transduction and integration (41) with lower immunogenicity compared with the adenovirus. The present study identified and functionally characterized the potential therapeutic value of knocking down the TRIM68 gene in human colorectal cancer cell lines SW1116 and HCT116. It was demonstrated that a downregulated TRIM68 expression level resulted in attenuated cell proliferation and colony formation. Cell cycle arrest and apparent apoptosis were also observed.

TRIM proteins, containing a RING finger, a B-box (B2) and a coiled-coil (CC) motif in the structure (7), may be classified into subfamilies I–XI on the basis of their structural variation (10,42,43). TRIM68, structurally characterized as RING/B2/CC/PRY/Sprouty, has identical domains compared with TRIM22, TRIM27, TRIM39 and TRIM41 (42). The endogenous expression level of TRIM22, which is also termed stimulated transacting factor of 50 kDa, may be upregulated by p53 (44). Additionally, TRIM22 has been implicated in proliferation and differentiation of promyelocytic cells (45). TRIM27, also termed ret finger protein, may serve as a small ubiquitin-related modifier E3 ligase, which has been implicated in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis and endogenous protein transportation (46). TRIM27 is highly expressed in various cancer cells (47); its expression level correlates with ERBB2 protein expression in breast cancer (24), and studies have demonstrated that TRIM27 triggers apoptosis by the activation of JUN N-terminal kinases (48). TRIM41 is able to associate with protein kinase C to control the function of other proteins by phosphorylation (49). TRIM39 is able to associate and bind to modulator of apoptosis 1 and regulate caspase-dependent apoptosis (50). To date, a number of studies have investigated the molecular role of TRIM68 in cancer cells. Miyajima et al (36) provided evidence that TRIM68 interacts with androgen receptor (AR) and enhances its transcriptional activity in the presence of dihydrotestosterone. TRIM68 may be implicated as a cofactor for AR-mediated transcription and serve as a promising therapeutic target for prostate cancer. Additional studies will investigate the growth-related signaling molecules that are associated with aberrant expression levels of endogenous TRIM68.

In conclusion, the present findings indicated that TRIM68 has a role in colorectal cancer cell proliferation. Depletion of TRIM68 triggers cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Lentivirus-mediated TRIM68 knockdown delivers efficient blocking of cancer cell colony formation, which indicates that TRIM68 is critical for colorectal cancer tumorigenesis. The present study revealed that TRIM68 may be a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of human colorectal cancer and deserves additional study.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81172307) and Youth Foundation of Chengdu Military General Hospital (grant no. 2016KC06, 41732C116).

References

1. Gaedcke J, Grade M, Camps J, Søkilde R, Kaczkowski B, Schetter AJ, Difilippantonio MJ, Harris CC, Ghadimi BM, Møller S, et al. The rectal cancer microRNAome-microRNA expression in rectal cancer and matched normal mucosa. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:4919–4930. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0016. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011 The impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:212–236. doi: 10.3322/caac.20121. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Merika E, Saif MW, Katz A, Syrigos K, Morse M. Review. Colon cancer vaccines: An update. In Vivo. 2010;24:607–628. [PubMed]
4. Cunningham D, Atkin W, Lenz HJ, Lynch HT, Minsky B, Nordlinger B, Starling N. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2010;375:1030–1047. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60353-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Xi ZW, Xin SY, Zhou LQ, Yuan HX, Wang Q, Chen KX. Downregulation of rho-associated protein kinase 1 by miR-124 in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:5454–5464. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5454. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Nakamura Y, Nishi M, Fukuda Y, Ogino M, Kosuga H. Case of the multiple liver metastases from colon cancer obtained long-term disease-free survival with multimodality therapy. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2012;39:2228–2230. [PubMed]
7. Reymond A, Meroni G, Fantozzi A, Merla G, Cairo S, Luzi L, Riganelli D, Zanaria E, Messali S, Cainarca S, et al. The tripartite motif family identifies cell compartments. EMBO J. 2001;20:2140–2151. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.9.2140. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Yamaguchi H, Hsu JL, Hung MC. Regulation of ubiquitination-mediated protein degradation by survival kinases in cancer. Front Oncol. 2012;2:15. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00015. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Hatakeyama S. TRIM proteins and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:792–804. doi: 10.1038/nrc3139. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. McNab FW, Rajsbaum R, Stoye JP, O'Garra A. Tripartite-motif proteins and innate immune regulation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011;23:46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.10.021. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Jensen K, Shiels C, Freemont PS. PML protein isoforms and the RBCC/TRIM motif. Oncogene. 2001;20:7223–7233. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204765. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. El Bougrini J, Dianoux L, Chelbi-Alix MK. PML positively regulates interferon gamma signaling. Biochimie. 2011;93:389–398. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.11.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Tsai WW, Wang Z, Yiu TT, Akdemir KC, Xia W, Winter S, Tsai CY, Shi X, Schwarzer D, Plunkett W, et al. TRIM24 links a non-canonical histone signature to breast cancer. Nature. 2010;468:927–932. doi: 10.1038/nature09542. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Herquel B, Ouararhni K, Khetchoumian K, Ignat M, Teletin M, Mark M, Béchade G, Van Dorsselaer A, Sanglier-Cianférani S, Hamiche A, et al. Transcription cofactors TRIM24, TRIM28, and TRIM33 associate to form regulatory complexes that suppress murine hepatocellular carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:8212–8217. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101544108. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Kikuchi M, Okumura F, Tsukiyama T, Watanabe M, Miyajima N, Tanaka J, Imamura M, Hatakeyama S. TRIM24 mediates ligand-dependent activation of androgen receptor and is repressed by a bromodomain-containing protein, BRD7, in prostate cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793:1828–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.11.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Shimono Y, Murakami H, Hasegawa Y, Takahashi M. RET finger protein is a transcriptional repressor and interacts with enhancer of polycomb that has dual transcriptional functions. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:39411–39419. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006585200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Krutzfeldt M, Ellis M, Weekes DB, Bull JJ, Eilers M, Vivanco MD, Sellers WR, Mittnacht S. Selective ablation of retinoblastoma protein function by the RET finger protein. Mol Cell. 2005;18:213–224. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Kano S, Miyajima N, Fukuda S, Hatakeyama S. Tripartite motif protein 32 facilitates cell growth and migration via degradation of Abl-interactor 2. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5572–5580. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6231. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Kudryashova E, Kudryashov D, Kramerova I, Spencer MJ. Trim32 is a ubiquitin ligase mutated in limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2H that binds to skeletal muscle myosin and ubiquitinates actin. J Mol Biol. 2005;354:413–424. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.09.068. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Sho T, Tsukiyama T, Sato T, Kondo T, Cheng J, Saku T, Asaka M, Hatakeyama S. TRIM29 negatively regulates p53 via inhibition of Tip60. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813:1245–1253. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.03.018. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Yuan Z, Villagra A, Peng L, Coppola D, Glozak M, Sotomayor EM, Chen J, Lane WS, Seto E. The ATDC (TRIM29) protein binds p53 and antagonizes p53-mediated functions. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:3004–3015. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01023-09. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Chambon M, Orsetti B, Berthe ML, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Rodriguez C, Duong V, Gleizes M, Thénot S, Bibeau F, Theillet C, Cavaillès V. Prognostic significance of TRIM24/TIF-1alpha gene expression in breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 2011;178:1461–1469. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.12.026. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Sakuma M, Akahira J, Suzuki T, Inoue S, Ito K, Moriya T, Sasano H, Okamura K, Yaegashi N. Expression of estrogen-responsive finger protein (Efp) is associated with advanced disease in human epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99:664–670. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.103. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Tezel GG, Uner A, Yildiz I, Guler G, Takahashi M. RET finger protein expression in invasive breast carcinoma: Relationship between RFP and ErbB2 expression. Pathol Res Pract. 2009;205:403–408. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2008.12.014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Yokoe T, Toiyama Y, Okugawa Y, Tanaka K, Ohi M, Inoue Y, Mohri Y, Miki C, Kusunoki M. KAP1 is associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:821–828. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0795-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Hawthorn L, Stein L, Panzarella J, Loewen GM, Baumann H. Characterization of cell-type specific profiles in tissues and isolated cells from squamous cell carcinomas of the lung. Lung Cancer. 2006;53:129–142. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.04.015. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Sugiura T, Miyamoto K. Characterization of TRIM31, upregulated in gastric adenocarcinoma, as a novel RBCC protein. J Cell Biochem. 2008;105:1081–1091. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21908. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Horn EJ, Albor A, Liu Y, El-Hizawi S, Vanderbeek GE, Babcock M, Bowden GT, Hennings H, Lozano G, Weinberg WC, Kulesz-Martin M. RING protein Trim32 associated with skin carcinogenesis has anti-apoptotic and E3-ubiquitin ligase properties. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25:157–167. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgh003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Vincent SR, Kwasnicka DA, Fretier P. A novel RING finger-B box-coiled-coil protein, GERP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;279:482–486. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3984. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Caratozzolo MF, Valletti A, Gigante M, Aiello I, Mastropasqua F, Marzano F, Ditonno P, Carrieri G, Simonnet H, D'Erchia AM, et al. TRIM8 anti-proliferative action against chemo-resistant renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2014;5:7446–7457. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2081. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Tomar D, Singh R. TRIM13 regulates ubiquitination and turnover of NEMO to suppress TNF induced NF-κB activation. Cell Signal. 2014;26:2606–2613. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.08.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Tomar D, Prajapati P, Sripada L, Singh K, Singh R, Singh AK, Singh R. TRIM13 regulates caspase-8 ubiquitination, translocation to autophagosomes and activation during ER stress induced cell death. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833:3134–3144. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.08.021. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Aucagne R, Droin N, Paggetti J, Lagrange B, Largeot A, Hammann A, Bataille A, Martin L, Yan KP, Fenaux P, et al. Transcription intermediary factor 1γ is a tumor suppressor in mouse and human chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:2361–2370. doi: 10.1172/JCI45213. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Wang E, Kawaoka S, Roe JS, Shi J, Hohmann AF, Xu Y, Bhagwat AS, Suzuki Y, Kinney JB, Vakoc CR. The transcriptional cofactor TRIM33 prevents apoptosis in B lymphoblastic leukemia by deactivating a single enhancer. Elife. 2015;4:e06377. doi: 10.7554/eLife.06377. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Noguchi K, Okumura F, Takahashi N, Kataoka A, Kamiyama T, Todo S, Hatakeyama S. TRIM40 promotes neddylation of IKKg and is downregulated in gastrointestinal cancers. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32:995–1004. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr068. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Miyajima N, Maruyama S, Bohgaki M, Kano S, Shigemura M, Shinohara N, Nonomura K, Hatakeyama S. TRIM68 regulates ligand-dependent transcription of androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:3486–3494. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6059. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Park CH, Bergsagel DE, McCulloch EA. Mouse myeloma tumor stem cells: A primary cell culture assay. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1971;46:411–422. [PubMed]
38. Xue L, Hou J, Wang Q, Yao L, Xu S, Ge D. RNAi screening identifies HAT1 as a potential drug target in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:3898–3907. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Micklem DR, Lorens JB. RNAi screening for therapeutic targets in human malignancies. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2007;8:337–343. doi: 10.2174/138920107783018426. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Seyhan AA. RNAi: A potential new class of therapeutic for human genetic disease. Hum Genet. 2011;130:583–605. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-0995-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Grimm D, Kay MA. RNAi and gene therapy: A mutual attraction. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2007:473–481. [PubMed]
42. Short KM, Cox TC. Subclassification of the RBCC/TRIM superfamily reveals a novel motif necessary for microtubule binding. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:8970–8980. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512755200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Ozato K, Shin DM, Chang TH, Morse HC., III TRIM family proteins and their emerging roles in innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:849–860. doi: 10.1038/nri2413. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Obad S, Brunnström H, Vallon-Christersson J, Borg A, Drott K, Gullberg U. Staf50 is a novel p53 target gene conferring reduced clonogenic growth of leukemic U-937 cells. Oncogene. 2004;23:4050–4098. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207524. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Hattlmann CJ, Kelly JN, Barr SD. TRIM22: A diverse and dynamic antiviral protein. Mol Biol Int. 2012;2012:153415. doi: 10.1155/2012/153415. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Chu Y, Yang X. SUMO E3 ligase activity of TRIM proteins. Oncogene. 2011;30:1108–1116. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.462. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Cao T, Shannon M, Handel MA, Etkin LD. Mouse ret finger protein (rfp) proto-oncogene is expressed at specific stages of mouse spermatogenesis. Dev Genet. 1996;19:309–320. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1996)19:4<309::AID-DVG4>3.3.CO;2-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Dho SH, Kwon KS. The Ret finger protein induces apoptosis via its RING finger-B box-coiled-coil motif. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:31902–31908. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304062200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Lee SS, Fu NY, Sukumaran SK, Wan KF, Wan Q, Yu VC. TRIM39 is a MOAP-1-binding protein that stabilizes MOAP-1 through inhibition of its poly-ubiquitination process. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:1313–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.11.021. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Chen D, Gould C, Garza R, Gao T, Hampton RY, Newton AC. Amplitude control of protein kinase C by RINCK, a novel E3 ubiquitin ligase. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:33776–33787. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703320200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications