Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of onclettLink to Publisher's site
Oncol Lett. 2017 March; 13(3): 1826–1834.
Published online 2017 February 1. doi:  10.3892/ol.2017.5660
PMCID: PMC5403286

High BIM mRNA levels are associated with longer survival in advanced gastric cancer


Chemotherapy drugs, including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin and docetaxel, are commonly used in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). Apoptosis-relevant genes may be associated with drug resistance. In the present study, the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of B-cell lymphoma 2 interacting mediator of cell death (BIM), astrocyte elevated gene-1 (AEG-1) and AXL receptor tyrosine kinase (AXL) were investigated in 131 advanced GC samples, and the expression levels of these genes were correlated with patients' overall survival (OS). All 131 patients received first-line FOLFOX combination chemotherapy with folinic acid and 5-FU, in which 56 patients were further treated with second-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy. A correlation between the mRNA expression levels of BIM and AEG-1 was observed (rs=0.30; P=0.002). There was no association between the mRNA expression levels of any of the individual genes analyzed and OS in patients only receiving first-line FOLFOX chemotherapy. In a subgroup of patients receiving docetaxel-based second-line chemotherapy, those with high or intermediate levels of BIM exhibited a median OS of 18.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 12.8–23.6], compared with 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.9–10.3) in patients with low BIM levels (P=0.008). However, there was no correlation between the mRNA expression levels of AEG-1 or AXL and OS. The risk of mortality was higher in patients with low BIM mRNA levels than in those with high or intermediate BIM mRNA levels (hazard ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.21–5.62; P=0.010). Therefore, BIM may be considered as a biomarker to identify whether patients could benefit from docetaxel-based second-line chemotherapy in GC.

Keywords: gene expression, BIM, second-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy, gastric cancer, apoptosis


The incidence of gastric cancer (GC) ranks as the fifth most frequent among all types of cancer worldwide (1). Nearly 40% of all GC cases occur in China, and are often diagnosed in advanced stages (2). The median overall survival (OS) for GC patients remains <12 months with first-line oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid treatment (3). Of all GC patients, ~1/2 could be candidates for second-line treatment at the time of failure of first-line chemotherapy (4). Docetaxel is among the most frequently used agents for GC second-line treatment (5). In a previous study by the present authors, the median OS was 25.8 months for patients with high messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) treated with second-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy (6). Recent evidence also suggests that an underlying cause of drug resistance may be the failure of drug-induced apoptosis (79). Platinum treatment initiates apoptosis through the formation of DNA adducts, which primarily form intrastrand crosslinks that activate the apoptotic pathway, eventually resulting in cell death (10,11). The most recognized mechanism of docetaxel-based regimen is the binding to microtubules, which arrests the cell cycle in G2/M and eventually leads to cell death (12).

B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) interacting mediator of cell death (BIM) belongs to the BCL-2 protein family, and is also a member of the BCL-2-homology 3-only (BH3-only) family (13). BIM is expressed in a wide variety of tissues, including GC, and acts as a pivotal regulator of the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway (14). Abnormal levels of BIM have been recognized to affect the chemotherapy response (15). Platinum-resistant cancer cells conserved sensitivity to BH3-induced mitochondrial apoptosis (16). In line with that, BH3-mimetic compounds such as ABT-737 were able to sensitize cancer cells to platinum (17). In addition, overexpression of BIM enhanced the in vitro sensitivity to docetaxel of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (18). Consistent with this finding, downregulation of BIM by small interfering RNA (siRNA) delayed paclitaxel-mediated apoptosis, indicating that low BIM expression levels were responsible for resistance to paclitaxel (19). Notably, pre-treatment mRNA levels of BIM strongly predicted the capacity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human EGFR 2 (HER2) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors to induce apoptosis in EGFR-mutant, HER2-amplified and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha-mutant tumors, respectively (20). In a previous study, the present authors observed that patients with high BIM expression achieved longer survival in EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with erlotinib or chemotherapy (21).

Astrocyte elevated gene-1 (AEG-1) was originally identified as a novel gene induced by human fetal astrocytes following infection with human immunodeficiency virus 1 (22). AEG-1 does not impact the uptake or retention of chemotherapy drugs; instead, AEG-1 increases chemoresistance by enhancing cell survival (23). Overexpression of AEG-1 suppresses apoptosis through phosphorylation of substrates of the anti-apoptotic protein kinase B (also known as AKT) (24), and is important in promoting cancer malignant behavior (25). In previous studies, AEG-1 overexpression correlated with poor prognosis in GC (25) and NSCLC (26). It has been confirmed that AEG-1 contributed to resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs such as 5-FU in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (27). Furthermore, knockdown of AEG-1 sensitized breast cancer cell lines to paclitaxel in vitro and in vivo (23). Low AEG-1 expression was associated with longer progression-free survival in platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC (28). In addition, AEG-1 mRNA expression correlated with BRCA1 expression (28), which induced sensitivity to docetaxel (6).

AXL receptor tyrosine kinase (AXL) belongs to the Tyro3, AXL and Mer family (29). Growth arrest-specific gene 6 (Gas6) is the ligand of AXL (30). In conjunction with each other, Gas6/AXL signaling may enhance cell survival (31). Activation of Gas6/AXL signaling induced the activation of the PI3K signaling pathway, which increased the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins such as BCL-2 and BCL-extra large (BCL-XL) (32). Overexpression of AXL was responsible for tumor growth in mesothelioma (33), lung cancer (34) and breast cancer (35). Furthermore, increased AXL activation has been linked with cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer (36).

In the present study, the mRNA expression levels of BIM, AEG-1 and AXL were examined in 131 advanced GC samples. In addition, the expression levels of the above genes were correlated with patients' clinicopathological features and OS to first-line FOLFOX combination chemotherapy with folinic acid and 5-FU, with or without second-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

Patients and methods

Study population

A total of 131 advanced GC samples in which BRCA1 mRNA expression levels had been previously determined (6) were included in the present study. Patients' clinical characteristics are indicated in Table I. All patients received a combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (FU) and folinic acid (FOLFOX) as first-line therapy (85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin plus 200 mg/m2 folinic acid and 600 mg/m2 5-FU every for 2 weeks until disease progression) for a median of 3 cycles (range, 1–8 cycles). A total of 34 patients received single-agent docetaxel (35 mg/m2), and the remaining 22 patients were treated with docetaxel-based doublets (6 patients received 35 mg/m2 docetaxel plus 100 mg/m2 irinotecan weekly for 3 weeks, every 4 weeks until disease progression; 11 patients received 35 mg/m2 docetaxel weekly for 3 weeks plus 1,000 mg/m2 capecitabine daily for 2 weeks, every 4 weeks until disease progression; and 5 patients received 35 mg/m2 docetaxel weekly for 3 weeks plus 6 mg/m2 hydroxycamptothecin on days 1 and 5, every 4 weeks until disease progression) for a median of 3 cycles (range, 1–7 cycles). Following progression, 56 patients further received docetaxel-based second-line chemotherapy. A total of 34 patients received single-agent docetaxel, and the remaining 22 patients were treated with docetaxel-based doublets, based on their response to first-line chemotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) and patient consent. Survival was calculated from the starting date of first-line treatment to the date of last follow-up or mortality from any cause. Approval was obtained from the patients and from the ethics committee of Drum Tower Hospital (Nanjing, China).

Table I.
Patient characteristics.

Gene expression analysis

Gene expression profiling was performed on RNA isolated from macrodissected tumor tissues containing ≥80% of tumor cells, in accordance with a proprietary procedure (European patent publication no. EP1945764-B1). Primers and probes for gene expression analysis of BIM, AEG-1 and AXL are indicated in Table II. The mRNA levels of BIM, AEG-1 and AXL were measured by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) using Taqman® Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), according to the comparative Cq method (37). β-actin was used as an endogenous control, and commercial RNA controls (Stratagene; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used as calibrators. RT-qPCR was conducted in a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The reactions were initiated by heating to 50°C for 2 min and then to 95°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 60 sec.

Table II.
Sequences of primers and probes.

Statistical analysis

Gene expression levels were analyzed as categorical variables by terciles. Correlations between gene expression and clinicopathological parameters were analyzed with the χ2 test. Correlations among different genes were conducted using Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis. Stratified log-rank tests were used to assess the median OS. Estimation of survival curves was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. All analyses were performed with SPSS version 17.0 software (SPSS, Inc.,Chicago, IL, USA). Two-sided P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.


Distribution and clinicopathological features of all patients

A total of 131 advanced GC samples were included in the study, of which, 100 were males and 31 females. The median age of all patients enrolled was 59.6 years (range, 22–84 years). All patients were pathologically confirmed as adenocarcinoma, of which, 79 patients (60.3%) were confirmed with stage III and 52 patients (39.7%) with stage IV disease (Table I).

Correlations among different genes

A correlation was observed between BIM and AEG-1 mRNA expression (rs=0.30; P=0.002). However, no associations were observed between BIM, AXL and AEG-1 mRNA expression (P=0.100 and 0.140 respectively).

Association between OS and clinicopathological characteristics

The median OS was 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.8–13.6) in all patients. Among the patients with stage III disease, the median OS was 12.9 months, compared with 9.6 months among the patients with stage IV disease (P=0.001). Notably, the median OS was ~12.5 months for patients with ECOG PS=0–1 vs. 6.3 months for patients with ECOG PS=2 (P<0.001). There was no significant association between OS and age (P=0.300), gender (P=0.630), tumor site (P=0.110) or histological grade (P=0.070) (Table III).

Table III.
Association between gene expression and clinicopathological characteristics in all patients.

Survival for GC patients according to mRNA expression levels

No association was observed between OS and the mRNA expression levels of BIM (P=0.170), AEG-1 (P=0.360) and AXL (P=0.250) in all 131 patients, respectively (Figs. 13).

Figure 1.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival in all patients according to the messenger RNA levels of B-cell lymphoma 2 interacting mediator of cell death. BIM, B-cell lymphoma 2 interacting mediator of cell death; OS, overall survival.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival in all patients according to the messenger RNA levels of AXL. OS, overall survival.

Among the 75 patients receiving only first-line FOLFOX chemotherapy, a trend towards longer survival was observed in those with low BIM levels (P=0.080). However, there was no difference in survival according to their AEG-1 (P=0.810) or AXL mRNA expression levels (P=0.350).

Among the 56 patients receiving additional docetaxel-based second-line chemotherapy, the median OS was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.9–10.3) for patients with low levels of BIM, 25.2 months (95% CI, 12.5–37.9) for those with intermediate BIM levels and 15.7 months (95% CI, 9.4–22.0) for those with high BIM levels (P=0.021). Considering the obvious trend of a longer OS in patients with higher BIM expression, high and intermediate expression groups were merged into a whole group for further analysis (Fig. 4). Patients with high or intermediate levels of BIM exhibited a median OS of 18.2 months (95% CI, 12.8–23.6), while patients with low BIM exhibited a median OS of just 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.9–10.3; P=0.008). Longer survival was also observed in patients with high levels of AEG-1 (P=0.080), although the difference was not significant. There was no difference in OS according to the expression levels of AXL (P=0.600).

Figure 4.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival in patients receiving docetaxel-based second-line chemotherapy according to the messenger RNA levels of B-cell lymphoma 2 interacting mediator of cell death. BIM, B-cell lymphoma 2 interacting mediator of cell ...

To further understand the role of BIM as a predictive biomarker, multivariate analysis of OS was performed. Patients with low BIM mRNA levels had higher mortality than those with high or intermediate BIM mRNA levels (HR of mortality, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.21–5.62; P=0.010). Lower risk of mortality was observed in patients with ECOG PS=0–1 compared with those with ECOG PS=2 (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04–0.65; P=0.010) in patients with stage III tumors, compared with patients with stage IV tumors (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17–0.82; P=0.010) (Table IV).

Table IV.
Median OS and HRs for risk of mortality in all patients.


Following the failure of first-line chemotherapy, several drugs are recommended for second-line regimens, including paclitaxel, docetaxel and irinotecan (38). The median OS of patients receiving second-line docetaxel-based regimens ranges from 3.5 to 10.9 months, which is still dismal (5). The present authors previously observed that GC patients with high BRCA1 levels could benefit from receiving second-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy (6). In addition, the median OS was further prolonged for patients with high levels of BRCA1 and multiple myeloma SET domain (39).

The DNA damage caused by chemotherapy leads to cell cycle arrest, DNA repair or commitment to apoptosis (40). Failure of drug-induced apoptosis is a vital reason for chemoresistance (41). A previous study identified that overexpression of genes involved in apoptosis appeared to contribute to docetaxel sensitivity in breast cancer through high-throughput screening of thousands of genes (42). It is commonly known that taxanes interfere with the dynamics of the microtubules and induce apoptosis through the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway (43).

In the present study, a marked difference in OS (18.2 vs. 9.6 months) was observed in patients receiving second-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy, according to their BIM mRNA expression levels in univariate analysis (P=0.008). In addition, this association was also significant in multivariate analysis, which further confirmed the role of BIM as a predictive biomarker. Patients with low BIM mRNA levels exhibited higher mortality than those with high or intermediate BIM mRNA levels (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.21–5.62; P=0.010). These results were consistent with previously published data suggesting that overexpression of BIM was accompanied by a collateral increase in sensitivity to taxanes (19), which may translate into prolonged OS.

BIM is an important mediator of tumor cell death (15). Other studies have previously demonstrated that several kinase-driven tumors, including chronic myelogenous leukemia and NSCLC, maintain a survival advantage by suppressing BIM transcription and by targeting BIM protein for proteasomal degradation (4446). Numerous studies have clearly demonstrated that activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway could regulate BIM expression (44,47). The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway triggers a cascade of cell responses, including cell cycle progression, programmed cell death and DNA damage repair in cancer (48). Furthermore, the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway is closely associated with the development and recurrence of cancer (49). The class O of forkhead box (FOXO) transcription factors are downstream effectors of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (50). When active, FOXOs induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, acting as anti-proliferative factors (51). BIM is mainly regulated by FOXO3a, a member of the FOXO family (52). Following an apoptotic-stress event, BIM translocates to the mitochondria, and is essential to mediate the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria, which in turn activates the effector caspase-9 and the formation of the apoptosome (53). Previous studies reported that the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 could increase BIM expression and cell death, which partly demonstrated a modulating role of PI3K/AKT signaling on BIM expression (47). The aforementioned results are in agreement with the pattern of FOXO3a dephosphorylation and nuclear translocation. The dephosphorylation status of AKT inhibits the nuclear export of its substrate FOXO3a to the cytoplasm, which transactivates the main target gene, BIM, to cause cell cycle arrest and cell death (52). In a previous study, BIM mRNA levels could be increased by upregulation of FOXO3a following paclitaxel treatment, leading to apoptosis in breast cancer cells and contributing to tumor sensitivity to paclitaxel (54). Thus, the impact of BIM and other BH3-only proteins in GC patients through apoptosis pathways should be further investigated.

AEG-1 was identified as an oncogene that caused detrimental effects to patients' OS through preventing cancer cells from undergoing apoptosis (55). Overexpression of AEG-1 leads to the activation of the PI3K/AKT pro-survival signaling pathway and the downregulation of BCL-2 associated agonist of cell death (BAD), p21, p27 and FOXO3a (24). In addition, increasing expression and activation of FOXO3a by AEG-1 knockdown further confirms this mechanism (56). AXL, a receptor tyrosine kinase, was originally cloned from cancer cells (57). A crucial step in AXL-dependent signal transduction is the activation of PI3K/AKT (58). The activation of AXL protects cells from apoptosis and increases the expression of the anti-apoptotic proteins BCL-2 and BCL-XL (59), as well as the phosphorylation of BAD (60). AXL is also implicated in angiogenesis (61) and immune response (62). Preclinical findings and retrospective studies have illustrated that overexpression of AEG-1 and AXL confers broad drug resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, including paclitaxel (63), cisplatin (64,65) and 5-FU (27). However, no correlations were observed in the present study between AEG-1 and AXL mRNA expression levels and patients' outcome to chemotherapy, either in first-line or second-line chemotherapy. This reflects the complexity of tumor drug response and the fact that single genes may not be sufficient to predict the therapeutic effect.

The present study has certain limitations. First, the number of patients included in the study is relatively small, which may cause bias in data analysis. In addition, the study is retrospective in nature. Furthermore, multiple gene models or signatures may be more effective than single biomarkers, as gene expression patterns associated with drug resistance and sensitivity are complex.

In conclusion, based on the significantly prolonged OS among patients with high or intermediate BIM mRNA expression in the present study, BIM may act as a potential biomarker in second-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy for GC. The findings in the current study pave the way for personalized chemotherapy in GC.

Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival in all patients according to the messenger RNA levels of astrocyte elevated gene-1. AEG-1, astrocyte elevated gene-1; OS, overall survival.


The present study was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Beijing, China; grant no. 81000980, 81220108023 and 81370064), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Beijing, China; grant no. 20620140729), the Jiangsu Provincial Program of Medical Science (Nanjing, China; grant no. BL2012001) and the Distinguished Young Investigator Project of Nanjing (Nanjing, China; grant no. JQX12002).


1. Fock KM. Review article: The epidemiology and prevention of gastric cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;40:250–260. doi: 10.1111/apt.12814. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Wadhwa R, Song S, Lee JS, Yao Y, Wei Q, Ajani JA. Gastric cancer-molecular and clinical dimensions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:643–655. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.170. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig WE. Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2903–2909. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0245. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Ji SH, Lim DH, Yi SY, Kim HS, Jun HJ, Kim KH, Chang MH, Park MJ, Uhm JE, Lee J, et al. A retrospective analysis of second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Wesolowski R, Lee C, Kim R. Is there a role for second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer? Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:903–912. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70136-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Wei J, Costa C, Ding Y, Zou Z, Yu L, Sanchez JJ, Qian X, Chen H, Gimenez-Capitan A, Meng F, et al. mRNA expression of BRCA1, PIAS1, and PIAS4 and survival after second-line docetaxel in advanced gastric cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1552–1556. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr326. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Yang X, Fraser M, Moll UM, Basak A, Tsang BK. Akt-mediated cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer: Modulation of p53 action on caspase-dependent mitochondrial death pathway. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3126–3136. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0425. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Yuan Z, Wang F, Zhao Z, Zhao X, Qiu J, Nie C, Wei Y. BIM-mediated AKT phosphorylation is a key modulator of arsenic trioxide-induced apoptosis in cisplatin-sensitive and-resistant ovarian cancer cells. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020586. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Asselin E, Mills GB, Tsang BK. XIAP regulates Akt activity and caspase-3-dependent cleavage during cisplatin-induced apoptosis in human ovarian epithelial cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61:1862–1868. [PubMed]
10. Jamieson ER, Lippard SJ. Structure, recognition, and processing of cisplatin-DNA adducts. Chem Rev. 1999;99:2467–2498. doi: 10.1021/cr980421n. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Kelland L. The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:573–584. doi: 10.1038/nrc2167. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Alberti C. Taxane- and epothilone-based chemotherapy: from molecule cargo cytoskeletal logistics to management of castration-resistant prostate carcinoma. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17:1658–1664. [PubMed]
13. Zheng JH, Follis A Viacava, Kriwacki RW, Moldoveanu T. Discoveries and controversies in BCL-2 protein-mediated apoptosis. FEBS J. 2016;283:2690–2700. doi: 10.1111/febs.13527. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Correia C, Lee SH, Meng XW, Vincelette ND, Knorr KL, Ding H, Nowakowski GS, Dai H, Kaufmann SH. Emerging understanding of Bcl-2 biology: Implications for neoplastic progression and treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1853:1658–1671. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.03.012. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Iurlaro R, Muñoz-Pinedo C. Cell death induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress. FEBS J. 2016;283:2640–2652. doi: 10.1111/febs.13598. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Crawford N, Chacko AD, Savage KI, McCoy F, Redmond K, Longley DB, Fennell DA. Platinum resistant cancer cells conserve sensitivity to BH3 domains and obatoclax induced mitochondrial apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2011;16:311–320. doi: 10.1007/s10495-010-0561-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Simonin K, N'Diaye M, Lheureux S, Loussouarn C, Dutoit S, Briand M, Giffard F, Brotin E, Blanc-Fournier C, Poulain L. Platinum compounds sensitize ovarian carcinoma cells to ABT-737 by modulation of the Mcl-1/Noxa axis. Apoptosis. 2013;18:492–508. doi: 10.1007/s10495-012-0799-x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Inoue Y, Gika M, Abiko T, Oyama T, Saitoh Y, Yamazaki H, Nakamura M, Abe Y, Kawamura M, Kobayashi K. Bcl-2 overexpression enhances in vitro sensitivity against docetaxel in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Rep. 2005;13:259–264. [PubMed]
19. Savry A, Carre M, Berges R, Rovini A, Pobel I, Chacon C, Braguer D, Bourgarel-Rey V. Bcl-2-enhanced efficacy of microtubule-targeting chemotherapy through Bim overexpression: Implications for cancer treatment. Neoplasia. 2013;15:49–60. doi: 10.1593/neo.121074. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Faber AC, Corcoran RB, Ebi H, Sequist LV, Waltman BA, Chung E, Incio J, Digumarthy SR, Pollack SF, Song Y, et al. BIM expression in treatment-naive cancers predicts responsiveness to kinase inhibitors. Cancer Discov. 2011;1:352–365. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0106. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Costa C, Molina MA, Drozdowskyj A, Giménez-Capitán A, Bertran-Alamillo J, Karachaliou N, Gervais R, Massuti B, Wei J, Moran T, et al. The impact of EGFR T790M mutations and BIM mRNA expression on outcome in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with erlotinib or chemotherapy in the randomized phase III EURTAC trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:2001–2010. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2233. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Su ZZ, Kang DC, Chen Y, Pekarskaya O, Chao W, Volsky DJ, Fisher PB. Identification and cloning of human astrocyte genes displaying elevated expression after infection with HIV-1 or exposure to HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein by rapid subtraction hybridization, RaSH. Oncogene. 2002;21:3592–3602. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205445. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Hu G, Wei Y, Kang Y. The multifaceted role of MTDH/AEG-1 in cancer progression. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5615–5620. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0049. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Lee SG, Su ZZ, Emdad L, Sarkar D, Franke TF, Fisher PB. Astrocyte elevated gene-1 activates cell survival pathways through PI3K-Akt signaling. Oncogene. 2008;27:1114–1121. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210713. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Jian-bo X, Hui W, Yu-long H, Chang-hua Z, Long-juan Z, Shi-rong C, Wen-hua Z. Astrocyte-elevated gene-1 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer. Med Oncol. 2011;28:455–462. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9475-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Song L, Li W, Zhang H, Liao W, Dai T, Yu C, Ding X, Zhang L, Li J. Over-expression of AEG-1 significantly associates with tumour aggressiveness and poor prognosis in human non-small cell lung cancer. J Pathol. 2009;219:317–326. doi: 10.1002/path.2595. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Yoo BK, Gredler R, Vozhilla N, Su ZZ, Chen D, Forcier T, Shah K, Saxena U, Hansen U, Fisher PB, Sarkar D. Identification of genes conferring resistance to 5-fluorouracil. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:12938–12943. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901451106. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Santarpia M, Magri I, Sanchez-Ronco M, Costa C, Molina-Vila MA, Gimenez-Capitan A, Bertran-Alamillo J, Mayo C, Benlloch S, Viteri S, et al. mRNA expression levels and genetic status of genes involved in the EGFR and NF-
29. B pathways in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients. J Transl Med. 2011;9:163. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-163. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Graham DK, DeRyckere D, Davies KD, Earp HS. The TAM family: Phosphatidylserine sensing receptor tyrosine kinases gone awry in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:769–785. doi: 10.1038/nrc3847. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. van der Meer JH, van der Poll T, van 't Veer C. TAM receptors, Gas6, and protein S: roles in inflammation and hemostasis. Blood. 2014;123:2460–2469. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-09-528752. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Papadakis ES, Cichoń MA, Vyas JJ, Patel N, Ghali L, Cerio R, Storey A, O'Toole EA. Axl promotes cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma survival through negative regulation of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131:509–517. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.326. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Verma A, Warner SL, Vankayalapati H, Bearss DJ, Sharma S. Targeting Axl and Mer kinases in cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011;10:1763–1773. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0116. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Ou WB, Corson JM, Flynn DL, Lu WP, Wise SC, Bueno R, Sugarbaker DJ, Fletcher JA. AXL regulates mesothelioma proliferation and invasiveness. Oncogene. 2011;30:1643–1652. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.555. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Wimmel A, Glitz D, Kraus A, Roeder J, Schuermann M. Axl receptor tyrosine kinase expression in human lung cancer cell lines correlates with cellular adhesion. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:2264–2274. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00271-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Berclaz G, Altermatt HJ, Rohrbach V, Kieffer I, Dreher E, Andres AC. Estrogen dependent expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase axl in normal and malignant human breast. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:819–824. doi: 10.1023/A:1011126330233. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Macleod K, Mullen P, Sewell J, Rabiasz G, Lawrie S, Miller E, Smyth JF, Langdon SP. Altered ErbB receptor signaling and gene expression in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65:6789–6800. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2684. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Bubner B, Baldwin IT. Use of real-time PCR for determining copy number and zygosity in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2004;23:263–271. doi: 10.1007/s00299-004-0859-y. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Elimova E, Shiozaki H, Wadhwa R, Sudo K, Chen Q, Estrella JS, Blum MA, Badgwell B, Das P, Song S, Ajani JA. Medical management of gastric cancer: A 2014 update. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:13637–13647. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13637. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Wei J, Costa C, Shen J, Yu L, Sanchez J, Qian X, Sun X, Zou Z, Gimenez-Capitan A, Yue G, et al. Differential effect of MMSET mRNA levels on survival to first-line FOLFOX and second-line docetaxel in gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:2662–2668. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.231. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Pan ST, Li ZL, He ZX, Qiu JX, Zhou SF. Molecular mechanisms for tumour resistance to chemotherapy. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2016;43:723–737. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12581. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Cree IA, Charlton P. Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance. BMC cancer. 2017;17:10. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2999-1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Chang JC, Wooten EC, Tsimelzon A, Hilsenbeck SG, Gutierrez MC, Elledge R, Mohsin S, Osborne CK, Chamness GC, Allred DC, O'Connell P. Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer. Lancet. 2003;362:362–369. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14023-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Kang BW, Kwon OK, Chung HY, Yu W, Kim JG. Taxanes in the rreatment of advanced gastric cancer. Molecules. 2016;21:E651. doi: 10.3390/molecules21050651. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Costa DB, Halmos B, Kumar A, Schumer ST, Huberman MS, Boggon TJ, Tenen DG, Kobayashi S. BIM mediates EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced apoptosis in lung cancers with oncogenic EGFR mutations. PLoS Med. 2007;4:1669–1680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040315. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Gong Y, Somwar R, Politi K, Balak M, Chmielecki J, Jiang X, Pao W. Induction of BIM is essential for apoptosis triggered by EGFR kinase inhibitors in mutant EGFR-dependent lung adenocarcinomas. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040294. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Kuroda J, Puthalakath H, Cragg MS, Kelly PN, Bouillet P, Huang DC, Kimura S, Ottmann OG, Druker BJ, Villunger A, et al. Bim and Bad mediate imatinib-induced killing of Bcr/Abl+ leukemic cells, and resistance due to their loss is overcome by a BH3 mimetic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:14907–14912. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606176103. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Qi XJ, Wildey GM, Howe PH. Evidence that Ser87 of BimEL is phosphorylated by Akt and regulates BimEL apoptotic function. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:813–823. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505546200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Brown JS, Banerji U. Maximising the potential of AKT inhibitors as anti-cancer treatments. Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Dec 2; doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.12.001. (Epub ahead of print) [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Sun Y, Tian H, Wang L, Yang H. The effects of silencing of PI3K p85α on 5-FU-induced colorectal cancer cells apoptosis. Med Oncol. 2013;30:704. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0704-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Carbajo-Pescador S, Mauriz JL, García-Palomo A, González-Gallego J. FoxO proteins: Regulation and molecular targets in liver cancer. Curr Med Chem. 2014;21:1231–1246. doi: 10.2174/0929867321666131228205703. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. de Mattos S Fernández, Villalonga P, Clardy J, Lam EW. FOXO3a mediates the cytotoxic effects of cisplatin in colon cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:3237–3246. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0398. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Vogiatzi P, De Falco G, Claudio PP, Giordano A. How does the human RUNX3 gene induce apoptosis in gastric cancer? Latest data, reflections and reactions. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006;5:371–374. doi: 10.4161/cbt.5.4.2748. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Piñon JD, Labi V, Egle A, Villunger A. Bim and Bmf in tissue homeostasis and malignant disease. Oncogene. 2008;27:S41–S52. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.42. (Suppl 1) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Sunters A, de Mattos S Fernández, Stahl M, Brosens JJ, Zoumpoulidou G, Saunders CA, Coffer PJ, Medema RH, Coombes RC, Lam EW. FoxO3a transcriptional regulation of Bim controls apoptosis in paclitaxel-treated breast cancer cell lines. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:49795–49805. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309523200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Hu G, Wei Y, Kang Y. The multifaceted role of MTDH/AEG-1 in cancer progression. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5615–5620. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0049. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
57. Wilson MS, Brosens JJ, Schwenen HD, Lam EW. FOXO and FOXM1 in cancer: The FOXO-FOXM1 axis shapes the outcome of cancer chemotherapy. Curr Drug Targets. 2011;12:1256–1266. doi: 10.2174/138945011796150244. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
58. Lemke G. Biology of the TAM receptors. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5:a009076. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a009076. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Li Y, Jia L, Ren D, Liu C, Gong Y, Wang N, Zhang X, Zhao Y. Axl mediates tumor invasion and chemosensitivity through PI3K/Akt signaling pathway and is transcriptionally regulated by slug in breast carcinoma. IUBMB Life. 2014;66:507–518. doi: 10.1002/iub.1285. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
60. Hasanbasic I, Cuerquis J, Varnum B, Blostein MD. Intracellular signaling pathways involved in Gas6-Axl-mediated survival of endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;287:H1207–H1213. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00020.2004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
61. Goruppi S, Ruaro E, Varnum B, Schneider C. Gas6-mediated survival in NIH3T3 cells activates stress signalling cascade and is independent of Ras. Oncogene. 1999;18:4224–4236. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202788. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
62. Holland SJ, Powell MJ, Franci C, Chan EW, Friera AM, Atchison RE, McLaughlin J, Swift SE, Pali ES, Yam G, et al. Multiple roles for the receptor tyrosine kinase axl in tumor formation. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9294–9303. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0993. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
63. Tjwa M, Bellido-Martin L, Lin Y, Lutgens E, Plaisance S, Bono F, Delesque-Touchard N, Hervé C, Moura R, Billiau AD, et al. Gas6 promotes inflammation by enhancing interactions between endothelial cells, platelets, and leukocytes. Blood. 2008;111:4096–4105. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-089565. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
64. Hu G, Chong RA, Yang Q, Wei Y, Blanco MA, Li F, Reiss M, Au JL, Haffty BG, Kang Y. MTDH activation by 8q22 genomic gain promotes chemoresistance and metastasis of poor-prognosis breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.11.013. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
65. Li C, Li Y, Wang X, Wang Z, Cai J, Wang L, Zhao Y, Song H, Meng X, Ning X, et al. Elevated expression of astrocyte elevated gene-1 (AEG-1) is correlated with cisplatin-based chemoresistance and shortened outcome in patients with stages III–IV serous ovarian carcinoma. Histopathology. 2012;60:953–963. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04182.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
66. Hong J, Peng D, Chen Z, Sehdev V, Belkhiri A. ABL regulation by AXL promotes cisplatin resistance in esophageal cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73:331–340. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3151. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications