PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of blackwellopenThis ArticleFor AuthorsLearn MoreSubmit
Journal of Surgical Oncology
 
J Surg Oncol. 2016 April 1; 113(5): 538–543.
Published online 2016 January 21. doi:  10.1002/jso.24163
PMCID: PMC5396262

Clinical application of decellularized and lyophilized human amnion/chorion membrane grafts for closing post‐laryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistulas

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common pathological type among the cancers of the larynx. Standard treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx is the combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and laryngectomy. Pharyngocutaneous fistula is a common complication of laryngectomy. We hypothesized that decellularized and lyophilized human amnion/chorion membrane can be an effective, non‐invasive method of treating pharyngocutaneous fistula.

Methods

A total of 67 patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed after treatment in a prospective trial. After preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and total or extended laryngectomy, primary wound healing occurred in 42 (62.7%) patients. Pharyngocutaneous fistula developed in 8 (11.9%) patients. Decellularized and lyophilized human amnion/chorion membrane grafts were used to reconstruct the fistulas.

Results

The average time for the full healing of the wound in all patients after transplantation of these grafts was 18 days.

Conclusion

The advantages of using these grafts over other existing methods of pharyngocutaneous fistula treatment are that they are non‐invasive, prevent donor morbidity, and enable management of the wound without using classical wound gauze. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:538–543. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Surgical Oncology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords: decellularized human amniotic membrane, pharyngocutaneous fistula, squamous cell carcinoma, total laryngectomy

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of laryngeal cancer is complex, and an ideal strategy has not yet been developed. Worldwide, 157,000 new cases of laryngeal cancer were diagnosed in 2012 1, and according to the United States National Cancer Institute, the incidence of new cases of larynx cancer was 3.2 per 100,000 men and women 2.

Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common cell type among the cancers of the larynx 3, 4, 5. Unfortunately, 40% of patients have late presentations (Stage III or IV) of disease 6, 7. Tumors may be identified in earlier stages, when vocal cords are affected by tumor. But, in most of the cases, tumors develop above or below vocal cords, which results in tumors manifesting at a later stage, as they remain asymptomatic for a longer period of time. In those cases, wide field resections are necessary, including total or extended laryngectomy, with possible resection of the base of tongue, and reconstruction with pharyngostomy, esophageal, or tracheal stomas 8, 9.

Early complications of total laryngectomy include wound hematoma and/or infection, along with tracheoesophageal, pharyngotracheal, or pharyngocutaneous fistulas 10, 11, 12, 13. Pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) is the most frequent major complication of those mentioned above. Rates of PCF between 8.5% and 24% have been most frequently reported 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23. Factors associated with the occurrence of PCF are stage of cancer, extent of resection, the use of preoperative radiation treatment in doses at or exceeding 50 Gy, and the method of repair of the pharyngeal defect 12, 24. A variety of treatments for PCF have been used, including local or regional flaps. Unfortunately, complications rates for these treatments remain high, in part due to impaired wound healing in the face of preoperative radiation treatment 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36.

Attention has recently been focused on biological and biosynthetic materials, hydrogel membranes, and three‐dimensional scaffolds, which have been successfully used for treatment of non‐healing wounds of various etiologies 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42. Human amniotic membrane has aroused particular interest in treatment of non‐healing wounds, as it possesses immunomodulative, anti‐microbial, anti‐inflammatory, fibrogeneic, and angiogeneic properties, as well as increasing extracellular matrix deposition 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52.

The hypothesis for this study was that decellularized and lyophilized human amnion/chorion membrane (DLHACM) grafts could be an effective and non‐invasive treatment for PCF after total laryngectomy, obviating the need for futher surgical procedures. The aim of the study was to develop a method for producing DLHACM grafts and for treating patients with PCF.

METHODS

All patients signed written informed consent for the study, conducted according to guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Georgian National Institute of Medical Research in Tbilisi, Georgia.

Fabrication of DLHACM Grafts

Three placentas were obtained from donors who signed an informed consent form and who gave birth at 38–42 weeks of gestation. All donors had normal pregnancies and delivered healthy newborn babies with weights ranging from 2,300 to 3,900 grams.

Decellularization of placentas was performed according to our previously described method 53. Briefly, newly acquired placentas were washed with 0.9% saline solution and heparin at 37°C under physiological pressure. For this purpose, polyethylene catheters were inserted into the umbilical artery and vein of the placentas and fixed in place with sutures. The placentas were flushed through the arterial catheter until clear solution was returned through the umbilical vein. After the washing, placentas were frozen at −80°C. Frozen placentas were then thawed to 40°C and washed with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS, Sigma) overnight, perfusing PBS through the catheter in the placental artery. Placentas were then perfused with Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS, Sigma) in distilled water for 72 hr starting with 0.01% SDS for 24 hr, then with 0.1% SDS for 24 hr, and finally with 1% SDS for 24 hr. Subsequently, to remove residual SDS, placentas were flushed with distilled water for 15 min and with 1% Triton X‐100 (Sigma) for 30 min. Decellularized placentas were then washed with PBS for 1 hr.

After the decellularization process, amniotic membranes were separated from the placentas and cut into 14 × 14 cm flaps, and fixated on special glass frames. The amniotic membranes were then lyophilized using Power Dry PL 6,000 Freeze Dryers. After lyophilization, the DLHACM grafts were packed in a disposable plastic bag and sterilized with gamma radiation using a dose of 15 kGy. The DLHACM grafts were then stored aseptically at room temperature until use.

DNA Quantification of DLHACM Grafts

DNA was isolated from the grafts with standard method using a commercial extraction kit (G‐spin Kit; iNtRON Biotechnology). The total DNA was determined on a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a wavelength of 260 nm. All samples were normalized to the human amnion dry weight.

The DNA content of human amnion/chorion membrane before treatment was 338 µg/ml. After the decellularization and lyophilization procedure, residual DNA content was less than 2%.

Histology and Fluorescence Immunohistochemistry

Histologic evaluation of human amniotic membranes was done both before and after decellularization and lyophilization. Cryosections (5 mm thick) were routinely processed and examined by light microscopy after H&E and Masson's trichrome staining.

Fluorescence immunohistochemistry was done according to the following methods. To test the Collagen Ia1 and Fibronectin antibodies on DLHACM, formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections 5 um thick were cut on a rotary microtome, mounted on charged slides, and baked overnight at 50°C in an oven. All staining procedures were performed at a room temperature. The slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated with water. Antigen retrieval was performed using steam and proteinase K digestion methods. After antigen retrieval, the slides were allowed to cool at room temperature for 20 min prior to the next step. Then the slides were rinsed in three PBS cycles for 5 min each and were blocked with 3% H2O2. After rinsing in three PBS cycles, the slides were incubated in primary antibody consisting of Collagen Ia1 (sc‐25974 at 1:100) and Fibronectin (sc‐8422 at 1:200) diluted with IHC‐Tek Antibody Diluent for 1 hr at a room temperature. The slides were then washed three times in PBS and incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody for 30 min. The slides were washed in PBS and then incubated with HRP‐Streptavidin for 30 min. Afterwards, incubation with DAB chromogen substrate solution was performed for 5–10 min, and then slides were rinsed with PBS and counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin. The stained slides were examined with regular microscope.

The current histological and immunohistochemical studies demonstrated the five different layers of the normal human amniotic membrane: epithelium; basement membrane; compact layer; fibroblast layer; and intermediate or sponge layer. The basement layer was formed by type III and IV collagens and glycoproteins such as laminin, fibronectin, and nidogen, which are the products of secretion of the epithelial layer cells of the amnion 54, 55. Next was the compact layer, forming the main fiber structure of the amnion, which was represented by types I, III, IV, and V collagen and fibronectin (Fig. (Fig.11).

Figure 1
Native, Decellularized, and lyophilized human amnion/chorion membrane. (A) Native human amnion/chorion membrane; (B) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of human amnion/chorion membrane; (C) Masson‐Trichrome staining of human amnion/chorion membrane; ...

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of DLHACM Grafts

The DLHACM grafts were dehydrated by processing with ethanol solution and were then dried with a Tousimis Samdri‐780 critical point dryer (Tousimis Research Corporation, Rockville, MD). After drying, all tissues were sputter coated lightly with gold (adjustments are shown below) and imaged on a Hitachi Scanning Electron microscope.

Scanning electron micrographs at low magnification demonstrated that types I and III collagen were bundled in the compact layer, and types IV and V collagens were located between the compact layer and basement membrane. These findings confirmed other studies, demonstrating that the process of decellularization and lyophilization used here preserved the unique, and porous structure of human amnion/choirion membrane within the DLHACM grafts 56, 57, 58.

Gene Expression Analysis of Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane and DLHACM Grafts

Total RNA from the amnion tissue was purified using miRNeasy mini kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen). The cDNA was synthesized using the iScript cDNA synthesis Kit (BioRad). Q‐PCR was carried out with iTaq universal SYBR green supermix (BioRad) on a 7,500 Fast Real‐Time PCR system (Life Technologies). The 18S rRNA was used as internal control for gene expression normalization.

These studies demonstrated that the DLHACM grafts consisted of a large number of different growth factors, especially BMP7, BMP8a, which enhance the wound healing process (Fig. (Fig.22).

Figure 2
Relative gene expression levels in native human amniotic membrane and decellularized and lyophilized human amnion/chorion membrane.

RESULTS

A total of 65 male and two female patients (mean age 54 years) with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, undergoing surgical treatment from January 2009 to December 2014 in Cancer Research Center of Tbilisi, Georgia, were enrolled into the study. All patients received comprehensive treatment consisting of preoperative chemotherapy and 50 Gy radiotherapy, followed by laryngectomy. Of the 67 patients, 12 (17.9%) were Stage I/II, 34 (50.7%) were Stage III, and 21 (31.4%) were Stage IV. Ten (14.9%) patients had total laryngectomy, 49 (73.1%) had total laryngectomy plus neck dissection, and 8 (12.0%) had extended larygectomy and neck dissection. In all cases, the initial defects after laryngectomy were closed using local and/or regional (delto‐pectoral or thoraco‐dorsal) flaps.

Primary wound healing occurred in 42 (62.7%) patients. The remaining 25 (37.3%) patients developed wound complications including hematoma, wound separation, necrosis of the skin edges, and flap necrosis. PCF occurred in various locations of the neck area in 8 (11.9%) patients, and DLHACM grafts were used to close these fistulas.

Application of DLHACM Grafts to Treat PCF

For all eight patients who developed a PCF, the wound was prepared with solution of 10% polyvidone‐iodine. After anaesthesia was induced with 1% lidocaine without epinephrine, necrotic tissue was mechanically debrided until viable, and bleeding tissue were encountered. DLHACM was delicately applied to the region, so that there were no air bubbles or blood clots between DLHACM and host tissue. DLHACM was generally tightly fixed to the wound, and only rarely were surgical sutures or fibrin glue applied.

The stages of reconstruction of a large PCF in the submental space are shown in Figure Figure3.3. All eight PCF closed, and the average time for the full healing of the wound after using DLHACM grafts was 18 days. Patients were followed every 3 months after closure of PCF, and there have not been any recurrences of PCF.

Figure 3
Application of decellularized and lyophilized human amnion/chorion membrane graft on the pharyngocutaneous fistula. (A) Pharyngocutaneous fistula developed after extended laryngectomy in submental region before transplantion; (B and C) After transplantation ...

DISCUSSION

Historically, the treatment of PCF after total laryngectomy has employed local or regional flaps created from the skin, muscles, and mucous membrane 25, 26, 27, 28, 29. Local flaps may be unreliable, since in most cases they have been affected by irradiation 30, 31, 32. The use of local flaps can lead to recurrence rates for PCF as high as 66.6%, necessitating closure using pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps 33. Even after primary reconstruction of PCF with pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps, the development of recurrent PCF varies between 16% and19%. The operation can also be accompanied by donor site infection (18%), donor site hematoma (10%), and flap necrosis (10%), with overall wound complications rates as high as 60% 34, 35, 36. These complications occur on the backdrop of operating in a radiated, contaminated space with significant tumors burdens, all of which further complicate wound healing 59, 60, 61.

The healing of postoperative PCF after using the DLHACM grafts was possible due to the unique characteristics of the human amnion/chorion membrane, which possesses immunomodulative, anti‐microbial, and anti‐inflammatory properties, hastens fibrogenesis and angiogenesis, and increases extracellular matrix deposition 62, 63, 64, 65. The amniotic membrane, separated from the chorion by the intermediate or the sponge layer, is mostly composed of type III collagen and glycoproteins. It also contains numerous growth factors, such as EGF, bFGF, KGF, VEGF, TGF‐a, TGF‐b, PDGF, HGF, and NGF 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71. In this study, the DLHACM grafts were tightly attached to the wound surface and efficiently absorbed wound exudates. It has also been previously demonstrated that this tight adherence allows removal of surface debris and bacteria from the wound 72. The unique physicomechanical and compositional properties of the human amnion/chorion membrane promote the migration of keratinocytes and various epithelial cells. Angiogenic growth factors, which are components of DLHACM grafts, also probably contribute to significant acceleration of neovascularization and formation of granulation tissue. DLHACM grafts also form an early closed physiologic space with the host, forming an adherence barrier with the wound via fibrin and elastin linkages that close the wound and prevent contamination 73.

CONCLUSION

After laryngectomy, the occurrence of a PCF is a severe complication. DLHACM grafts are very good biomaterials for clinical application, especially in patients suffering from this complication. The advantages of using DLHACM grafts over other existing treatment methods for PC is that they are non‐invasive, prevent donor morbidity, and are effective in closing PCF without further surgical intervention.

Notes

Conflict of interest: The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by all institutions involved in accordance with their policy on objectivity in research.

REFERENCES

2. SEER cancer statistics factsheets: Larynx cancer. National cancer institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/laryn.html
3. Sirikanjanapong S, Lanson B, Amin M, et al.: Collision tumor of primary laryngeal mucosal melanoma and invasive squamous cell carcinoma with IL‐17A and CD70 gene over‐expression. Head Neck Pathol 2010; 4:295–299. [PubMed]
4. Marur S, Forastiere AA: Head and neck cancer: Changing epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 2008; 83:489–501. [PubMed]
5. Barnes L: Surgical pathology of the head and neck, 3rd edition Informa Healthcare: New York; 2008. pp. 137–160.
6. Mohamed TE Tabbakh, Mohamed Ahmed Ahmed, Doaa F Sedik, et al.: Management of patients with cancer of the larynx in Suez Canal University Teaching Hospital: 5 years’ experience. Egypt J Otolaryngol 2014; 30:30–33.
7. Janfaza P, Nadol J, Galla R: Surgical anatomy of the head and neck [chapter 11] Anatomy of the neck. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
8. D'Cruz AK, Sharma S, Pai PS: Current status of near‐total laryngectomy: Review. J Laryngol Otol 2012; 126:556–562. [PubMed]
9. Forastiere AA, Weber RS, Trotti A: Organ preservation for advanced larynx cancer: Issues and outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2015. Pii: JCO. 2015.61.2978. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Aslam MJ, Ahmed Z, Aslam MA, et al.: Complication of total laringectomy. Pak J Med Sci 2006; 22:33–37.
11. Dedivitis RA, Ribeiro KC, Castro MA, et al.: Pharyngocutaneous fistula following total laryngectomy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2007; 27:2–5. [PubMed]
12. Virtaniemi JA, Kumpulainen EJ, Hirvikoski PP, et al.: The incidence and etiology of postlaryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistulae. Head Neck 2001; 23:29–33. [PubMed]
13. Saki N, Nikakhlagh S, Kazemi M: Pharyngocutaneous fistula after laryngectomy: Incidence, predisposing factors, and outcome. Arch Iran Med 2008; 11:314–317. [PubMed]
14. Markou KD, Vlachtsis KC, Nikolaou AC, et al.: Incidence and predisposing factors of pharyngocutaneous fistula formation after total laryngectomy. Is there a relationship with tumor recurrence? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 261:61–67. [PubMed]
15. Haksever M, Akduman D, Aslan S, et al.: Modified continuous mucosal connell suture for the pharyngeal closure after total laryngectomy: Zipper suture. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 8:281–288. [PubMed]
16. Deniz M, Ciftci Z, Gultekin E: Pharyngoesophageal suturing technique may decrease the incidence of pharyngocutaneous fistula following total laryngectomy. Surg Res Pract 2015; 2015:363640. [PubMed]
17. Aires FT, Dedivitis RA, Castro MA, et al.: Pharyngocutaneous fistula following total laryngectomy. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 78:94–98. [PubMed]
18. Sarra LD, Rodríguez JC, García Valea M, et al.: Fistula following total laryngectomy. Retrospective study and bibliographical review. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2009; 60:186–189. [PubMed]
19. Betlejewski S, Szymańska‐Skrzypek A: Post‐laryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistula‐a continuing clinical problem. Otolaryngol Pol 2007; 61:271–279. [PubMed]
20. Kasapoğlu F, Erişen L, Coşkun H, et al.: The management of pharyngocutaneous fistulas after total laryngectomy and the factors affecting their incidence. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2003; 11:5–10. [PubMed]
21. Redaelli de Zinis LO, Ferrari L, Tomenzoli D, et al.: Postlaryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistula: Incidence, predisposing factors, and therapy. Head Neck 1999; 21:131–138. [PubMed]
22. Venegas MP, León X, Quer M, et al.: Complications of total laryngectomy in relation to the previous radiotherapy. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 1997; 48:639–646. [PubMed]
23. Shemen LJ, Spiro RH: Complications following laryngectomy. Head Neck Surg 1986; 8:185–191. [PubMed]
24. Mendelsohn MS, Bridger GP: Pharyngocutaneous fistulae following laryngectomy. Aust N Z J Surg 1985; 55:177–179. [PubMed]
25. Ferrari S, Ferri A, Bianchi B, et al.: Donor site morbidity after scapular tip free flaps in head‐and‐neck reconstruction. Microsurgery 2015. [PubMed]
26. Aniсin A, Sifrer R, Strojan P: Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in primary and salvage head and neck cancer surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015. Pii: S0278‐239100600‐X. [PubMed]
27. Knott PD, Seth R, Waters HH, et al.: Short‐term donor site morbidity: A comparison of the anterolateral thigh and radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flaps. Head Neck 2015. [PubMed]
28. Riecke B, Assaf AT, Heiland M, et al.: Local full‐thickness skin graft of the donor arm‐a novel technique for the reduction of donor site morbidity in radial forearm free flap. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44:937–941. [PubMed]
29. Li J, Han Z: Sternocleidomastoid muscle flap used for repairing the dead space after supraomohyoid neck dissection. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8:1296–1300. [PubMed]
30. Hirsch DL, Bell RB, Dierks EJ, et al.: Analysis of microvascular free flaps for reconstruction of advanced mandibular osteoradionecrosis: A retrospective cohort study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:2545–2556. [PubMed]
31. Robinson DW: Surgical problems in the excision and repair of radiated tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 55:41–49. [PubMed]
32. Rudolph R: Complications of surgery for radiotherapy skin damage. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 70:179–185. [PubMed]
33. Nicholas C, Duggal P, Chen A, et al.: Surgical management of pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68:442–445. [PubMed]
34. Sousa AA, Castro SM, Porcaro‐Salles JM, et al.: The usefulness of a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in preventing salivary fistulae after salvage total laryngectomy. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 78:103–107. [PubMed]
35. Aničin A, Šifrer R, Strojan P: Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in primary and salvage head and neck cancer surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73:2057–2064. [PubMed]
36. El‐Marakby HH: The reliability of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2006; 18:41–50. [PubMed]
37. Dhillon M, Carter CP, Morrison J, et al.: Comparison of skin graft success in the head & neck with and without the use of a pressure dressing. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2015; 14:240–242. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Achauer BM, VanderKam VM, Celikoz B, et al.: Augmentation of facial soft‐tissue defects with AlloDerm dermal graft. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 41:503–507. [PubMed]
39. Pearl AW, Woo P, Ostrowski R, et al.: A preliminary report on micronized AlloDerm injection laryngoplasty. Laryngoscope 2002; 112:990–996. [PubMed]
40. Paul M, Kaur P, Herson M, et al.: Use of clotted human plasma and aprotinin in skin tissue engineering: A novel approach to engineering composite skin on a porous scaffold. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2015; 21:1098–1104. [PubMed]
41. MacLeod TM, Cambrey A, Williams G, et al.: Evaluation of permacol as a cultured skin equivalent. Burns 2008; 34:1169–1175. [PubMed]
42. Han F, Dong Y, Su Z, et al.: Preparation, characteristics and assessment of a novel gelatin‐chitosan sponge scaffold as skin tissue engineering material. Int. J Pharm 2014; 476:124–133. [PubMed]
43. Wei JP, Zhang TS, Kawa S, et al.: The Human amnionisolated cells normalize blood glucose in streptozotocin‐induced diabetic mice. Cell Transplant 2003; 12:545–552. [PubMed]
44. Weiss ML, Anderson C, Medicetty S, et al.: Immune response of human umbilical wharton jelly‐derived cell. Stem Cells 2008; 26:2865–2874. [PubMed]
45. Talmi YP, Sigler L, Inge E, et al.: Antibacterial properties of human amniotic membranes. Placenta 1991; 12:285–288. [PubMed]
46. Colocho G, Graham WP 3rd, Greene AE, et al.: Human amniotic membrane as a physiologic wound dressing. Arch Surg 1974; 109:370–373. [PubMed]
47. Rauz S, Saw VP: Serum eye drops, amniotic membrane and limbal epithelial stem cells–tools in the treatment of ocular surface disease. Cell Tissue Bank 2010; 11:13–27. [PubMed]
48. Wichayacoop T, Briksawan P, Tuntivanich P, et al.: Anti‐inflammatory effects of topical supernatant from human amniotic membrane cell culture on canine deep corneal ulcer after human amniotic membrane transplantation. Vet Ophthalmol 2009; 12:28–35. [PubMed]
49. Yazdanpanah G, Paeini‐Vayghan G, Asadi S, et al.: The effects of cryopreservation on angiogenesis modulation activity of human amniotic membrane. Cryobiology 2015. Pii: S0011‐2240(15) 00250‐3. [PubMed]
50. Rodríguez‐Ares MT, López‐Valladares MJ, Touriño R, et al.: Effects of lyophilization on human amniotic membrane. Acta Ophthalmol 2009; 87:396–403. [PubMed]
51. Bowler PG, Duerden BI, Armstrong DG: Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14:244–269. [PubMed]
52. Velding K, Klis SA, Abass KM, et al.: Wound care in Buruli ulcer disease in Ghana and Benin. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2014; 91:313–318. [PubMed]
53. Karalashvili L, Kakabadze A, Vyshnevska G, et al.: Acellular human amniotic membrane as a three‐dimensional scaffold for the treatment of mucogingival defects. Georgian Med News 2015; 244‐245:84–89. [PubMed]
54. Peng Y, Xuan M, Zou J, et al.: Freeze‐dried rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell paracrine factors: A simplified novel material for skin wound therapy. Tissue Eng Part A 2015; 21:1036–1046. [PubMed]
55. Choi JS, Kim JD, Yoon HS, et al.: Full‐thickness skin wound healing using human placenta‐derived extracellular matrix containing bioactive molecules. Tissue Eng Part A 2013; 19:329–339. [PubMed]
56. Parry S, Strauss JF: Premature rupture of the fetal membranes. New Engl J Med 1998; 338:663–670. [PubMed]
57. Koob TJ, Lim JJ, Massee M, et al.: Properties of dehydrated human amnion/chorion composite grafts: Implications for wound repair and soft tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2014; 102:1353–1362. [PubMed]
58. Malak TM, Ockleford CD, Bell SC, et al.: Confocal immunofluorescence localization of collagen types I, III, IV, V and VI and their ultrastructural organization in term human fetal membranes. Placenta 1993; 14:385–406. [PubMed]
59. Fraioli R, Johnson JT: Prevention and treatment of postsurgical head and neck infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2004; 6:172–180. [PubMed]
60. González‐Márquez R, Rodrigo JP, Suárez Nieto C: Prognostic significance of postoperative wound infections after total laryngectomy. Head Neck 2012; 34:1023–1027. [PubMed]
61. Penel N, Fournier C, Roussel‐Delvallez M, et al.: Prognostic significance of wound infections following major head and neck cancer surgery: An open non‐comparative prospective study. Support Care Cancer 2004; 12:634–639. [PubMed]
62. Niknejad H, Peirovi H, Jorjani M, et al.: Properties of the amniotic membrane for potential use in tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater 2008; 15:88–99. [PubMed]
63. Choi JS, Kim JD, Yoon HS, et al.: Full‐thickness skin wound healing using human placenta‐derived extracellular matrix containing bioactive molecules. Tissue Eng Part A 2013; 19:329–339. [PubMed]
64. Guo Q, Lu X, Xue Y, et al.: A new candidate substrate for cell‐matrix adhesion study: The acellular human amniotic matrix. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012; 2012:306083. [PubMed]
65. Gruss JS, Jirsch DW: Human amniotic membrane: A versatile wound dressing. Can Med Assoc J 1978; 118:1237–1246. [PubMed]
66. Lopez‐Valladares MJ, Rodriguez‐Ares MT, Tourino R: et al.: Donor age and gestational age influence on growth factor levels in human amniotic membrane. Acta Opththalmol 2010; 88:e211–e216. [PubMed]
67. Russo A, Bonci P, Bonci P: The effects of different preservation processes on the total protein and growth factor content in a new biological product developed from human amniotic membrane. Cell Tissue Bank 2012; 13:353–361. [PubMed]
68. Kay H, Nelson D, Wang Y: “ The placenta: From development to disease.” Wiley‐Blackwell 2011.
69. Koob TJ, Lim JJ, Massee M, et al.: Angiogenic properties of dehydrated human amnion/chorion allografts: Therapeutic potential for soft tissue repair and regeneration. Vasc Cell 2014; 6:10. [PubMed]
70. Massee M, Chinn K, Lei J, et al.: Dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane regulates stem cell activity in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Alcaraz A, Mrowiec A, Insausti CL, et al.: Amniotic membrane modifies the genetic program induced by TGFß, stimulating keratinocyte proliferation and migration in chronic wounds. PLoS ONE 2015; 18:e0135324. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
72. Rao TV, Chandrasekhram V: Use of dry human and bovine amnion as a biological dressing. Arch Surg 1981; 116:891–896. [PubMed]
73. Walker AB, Cooney DR, Allen JE: Use of fresh amnion as burn dressing. J Pediatr Surg 1977; 12:391. [PubMed]

Articles from Wiley-Blackwell Online Open are provided here courtesy of Wiley-Blackwell, John Wiley & Sons