Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 46467.
Published online 2017 April 18. doi:  10.1038/srep46467
PMCID: PMC5394477

Immune Tissue Print and Immune Capture-PCR for Diagnosis and Detection of Candidatus Liberibacter Asiaticus


Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CaLas), associated with citrus Huanglongbing (HLB), is a non culturable member of the α-proteobacteria. In this study serologically based methods for the detection of CaLas were developed. An anti-outer membrane protein A (OmpA) polyclonal antibody previously produced (in our laboratory) was highly effective for the detection of CaLas from citrus tissues in a simple tissue printing format. The antibody was also used to capture bacteria from periwinkle extracts. About 80% of all field samples analyzed tested positive with both immune tissue printing and qPCR; whereas 95% were positive with at least one of these two methods. When asymptomatic citrus tissues were tested, the tissue printing method gave a higher rate of detection (83%) than the qPCR method (64%). This is consistent with a lower concentration of CaLas DNA, but a higher proportion of viable cells, in the asymptomatic tissues. The immune tissue printing method also highlights the detail of the spatial distribution of ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ in diseased citrus tissues. Both the immune capture PCR and immune tissue printing methods offer the advantages of low cost, high throughput, ease of scaling for multiple samples and simplicity over current PCR-based methods for the detection of ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’.

Citrus huanglongbing (HLB), also known as citrus greening, is one of the most devastating diseases of citrus and threatens the citrus industry worldwide1,2,3, leading to large reductions in fruit production and quality as well as decline of infected trees. The disease is associated with a phloem-limited and fastidious member of the α-proteobacteriacea, ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CaLas). CaLas originated in Asia1, and is the only species of Liberibacter associated with citrus with a global distribution and is the one associated with HLB disease in the United States. CaLas is a member of the Rhizobiaceae, and as is typical for intracellular pathogens, has a significantly reduced genome (1.23 Mb)4,5. Because the bacterium has not been cultured and classically characterized the name has only ‘Candidatus’ status. Typical disease symptoms include yellow shoots within a sector of the tree, with leaves that mature to an asymetric blotchy mottle that may appear to be similar to zinc deficiency. The infected fruit are reduced in size and become lopsided due to seed infection and abortion and off flavors develop6,7. Vein corking, a symptom also observed with some strains of Citrus tristeza virus, was recently reported especially in old citrus leaves7. A closely related species, ‘Ca. Liberibacter solanacearum’ (CaLso), was recently reported as the causal agent of potato zebra chip disease8. CaLso can also infect other hosts like tomato, pepper9 and carrot10.

Although HLB has been known for more than a century, the fact that CaLas cannot be cultured made it impossible to use traditional bacteriological methods to identify the pathogen and delayed the establishment of the etiology of the disease. In recent years, HLB associated with CaLas has spread widely within China, has become endemic in both Brazil and Florida7, and is also present in Texas11 and California12. Owing to inadequate disease and vector control methods, and the extreme difficulty in protecting citrus from infection by CaLas, commercial citrus industries have suffered great economic losses from HLB and continue to decline2. Growers in Florida currently maintain strict control programs for the citrus psyllid vector, even after trees become infected with CaLas to prevent new infections from occurring13, and support the tree’s increased nutritional needs by supplemental nutritional programs14.

Confirmatory diagnosis of symptomatic and asymptomatic trees remains challenging. For most of the 20th century, the diagnosis of HLB relied on bio-indexing with plants such as Citrus reticulata Blanco (mandarin orange) and Citrus sinensis (L.) (sweet orange) or the experimental non-rutaceous host, Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle). Other methods developed to detect and diagnose HLB include Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)15,16,17, qPCR18,19, and Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP)20,21 and a lateral flow dipstick assay22. All of the PCR-based methods require purification of DNA before the assay, which adds to the cost of the assays. CaLas is found only in the sieve tube elements of infected plants1,23. Although infections are systemic from the roots to the young shoots, the distribution of CaLas is very uneven and on average the concentrations of the pathogen are low in tissues sampled24,25. Ultrastructural studies have shown that adjacent phloem cells can be completely filled with CaLas or empty26,27. Furthermore, the population levels of CaLas in individual trees as estimated by qPCR is not well correlated with foliar symptoms24. This could be due to the fact that populations of CaLas increase in root tissues long before foliar symptoms become obvious28. The mean CaLas concentration in asymptomatic leaves was significantly lower than that in symptomatic leaves as estimated by qPCR29.

Serological assays are widely used to diagnose plant diseases, but have not been widely used for HLB because the pathogen has not been available in culture to produce antibodies against CaLas cells. However, proteins produced by CaLas are available for use as antigens by PCR-based cloning and either poly- or monoclonal antibodies can be made against them since the genome of CaLas became available4. Due to the limitations of current assays, and the large numbers of trees that must be sampled in citrus production areas where the disease is either present or feared, it is important to develop fast, efficient and inexpensive methods to accurately detect CaLas. Previously, we constructed and produced a highly specific anti-OmpA polyclonal antibody against CaLas30,31. Here we report the optimization of a simple immune tissue print and demonstrate an immune capture-PCR (IC-PCR) assay based on a polyclonal antibody (Pab) raised in rabbit against the major outer membrane protein (OmpA) of CaLas. These optimized immune tissue print and IC-PCR methods complement existing PCR-based methods and will meet the urgent need for large scale detection of CaLas for the continued sustainability of the United States citrus industry.


Optimization of the working dilutions of the anti-OmpA Pab and the goat anti-rabbit conjugated Pab

The dilutions of the anti-OmpA Pab and the secondary goat anti-rabbit Pab were optimized. In a preliminary trial, the anti-OmpA Pab produced a very strong color reaction localized in the phloem cells when a 1:500 dilution was used. Serial dilutions of anti-OmpA Pab, from 1:1,000 to 1:10,000 were then tested with the dilution of goat anti-rabbit secondary Pab held constant at 1:50,000 dilution. When the anti-OmpA Pab was diluted from 1:1,000 to 1:4,000, very strong signals were produced in leaf midrib sections from both CaLas-infected and healthy controls (Fig. S1a–d). Color was observed not only in the phloem cells, but also outside of the phloem tissues. When the anti-OmpA Pab was diluted to 1:5,000 and 1:6,000 (Fig. S1e and f), the difference between diseased and healthy control petiole sections was very pronounced: very strong purple colored spots were seen in the CaLas infected phloem cells, but only a weak pink background was present in the healthy controls. When the anti-OmpA Pab was diluted from 1:7,000 to 1:10,000 (Fig. S1g–j), the purple color was strong in the phloem cells, with very little background color in the healthy controls.

In order to optimize the concentration of the secondary goat anti-rabbit Pab, serial dilutions were made from 1:10,000 to 1:100,000 with the anti-OmpA Pab held constant at a dilution of 1:5,000. A strong purple color was present in both CaLas-infected and healthy control petiole sections when the goat anti-rabbit secondary Pab was diluted from 1:10,000 to 1:40,000 (Fig. S2a–d). When the goat anti-rabbit polyclonal antibody was diluted 1:50,000, a strong purple color was observed in CaLas-infected phloem cells, but there was a weak background in the healthy control (Fig. S2e). As the goat anti-rabbit antibody was diluted further, from 1:60,000 to 1:100,000 (Fig. S2f–j), the intensity of the purple colored spots in the phloem cells was reduced and no purple colored spots were produced in the healthy control.

Detection of CaLas in different citrus tissues by tissue printing

Using the optimized dilutions of both the primary Pab (1:5000) and secondary Pab (1:50,000), petioles, stems, seeds and roots collected from sweet orange were tested. In tissue prints made from the petioles and stems, strong purple colored spots were produced in the phloem cells of CaLas-infected samples, but not in similar tissue prints from healthy controls (Fig. 1a,b). In tissue prints from infected seeds, CaLas was distributed in the seed coat. Tissue prints from seeds obtained from fruit known to be free of CaLas did not produce any purple color (Fig. 1c). In tissue prints prepared from primary roots, we usually observed less purple color in the phloem cells (Fig. 1d) as compared to the phloem cells of petioles and stems. No purple color was observed in tissue prints of roots from healthy controls. When observed with higher magnification, the purple colored spots were sharply focused in individual phloem cells (Fig. 1a1–d1).

Figure 1
Detection of ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ in different tissues of sweet orange using tissue prints.

Detection of CaLas by IC-PCR and qPCR from citrus and periwinkle samples

IC-PCR was performed to capture CaLas strain B432 (Florida) from infected sweet orange and periwinkle extracts. When PCR tubes were pre-coated with anti-OmpA Pab at dilutions of 1:100, 1:200, 1:250 to capture CaLas from citrus petioles, more PCR amplification product was seen after electrophoresis (Fig. 2 Lanes 1,3,5) than when no anti-OmpA Pab was added to PCR tubes (Fig. 2 Lane 7). Amplification products were not produced from healthy control samples (Fig. 2 Lanes 2,4,6). For the IC-PCR tests of periwinkle extracts, tubes were pre-coated with the anti-OmpA Pab at 1:200 dilution. When different amounts of crude extracts were tested, sample volumes of 100 μl or 200 μl gave much stronger amplification products than when only 20 μl or 50 μl of extracts were used (Fig. 3). When PCR tubes were not pre-coated with anti-Omp Pab as a control, only weak amplification product bands were produced by CaLas-infected samples (Fig. 3 Lanes 3,6,9,12). Detection of CaLas from different periwinkle and citrus isolates using the IC-PCR method was compared with results of DNA extraction followed by qPCR. Samples with lower Cq values when assayed by qPCR generally produced much stronger amplification products when assayed by IC-PCR than did samples with higher Cq values (Fig. 4). The limit of detection for IC-PCR was somewhere near a Cq of 25, because CaLas were not captured and amplified when Cq values were above that point.

Figure 2
Immune capture-PCR for the detection of ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ isolate B432 (Florida).
Figure 3
Immune capture-PCR for the detection of ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ in periwinkle.
Figure 4
Immune capture-PCR for the detection of ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ in periwinkle and citrus samples.

Detection of CaLas in symptomatic and asymptomatic field samples by tissue print and qPCR

To test the efficiency of the tissue print assay, 50 symptomatic and 50 asymptomatic leaf samples were collected in Florida from trees with symptoms of HLB and tested with both the tissue print and qPCR. Tissue prints from symptomatic petioles produced clear positive results for both tissue prints and qPCR (Fig. 5a). Tissue prints from asymptomatic leaf samples also produced clear positive reactions, even when the qPCR result was negative in some cases (Fig. 5b). In samples from known healthy controls, no purple colored spots localized in phloem cells or amplification products were observed (Fig. 5c), though a diffuse purple ring, without localization in the phloem cells, was seen in one of the samples (Fig. 5d). Among the symptomatic leaf samples tested and evaluated by 3 independent individuals, CaLas was detected in 72.7 ± 3.06% of the tissue prints and qPCR detected CaLas in 98.0 ± 0.58% of the samples (Table 1). Among asymptomatic leaf samples from infected trees, 82.8 ± 3.46% of tissue prints were positive, but only 64.0 ± 3.06% were positive by qPCR.

Figure 5
Detection of ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ by tissue printing of symptomatic and asymptomatic sweet orange leaves collected from Florida citrus groves.
Table 1
Detection of ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ in field samples of sweet orange collected in Florida by tissue printing and qPCR.


Serology is the method of choice used in plant pathology for detection of bacterial, viral and fungal pathogens. Specific polyclonal, monoclonal, or recombinant antibodies are available for many plant pathogens32,33,34,35. Monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) produced by hybridoma technology are highly specific against individual genera, species or isolates of plant pathogens or even for developmental stages of nematodes36. Mabs against CaLas were produced as early as in the 1980’s, but they were strain-specific and detected only the strain used for immunization but not another strain of CaLas37. Thus the Mabs were too specific for general diagnostic applications38 and the work was discontinued. Serological detection mainly relies on antibodies generated against unique antigens on the surfaces of plant pathogens. The detection thresholds of serologically-based assays vary significantly based on the type and quality of the antibody and the testing format39. OmpA was selected and used as antigen to produce polyclonal antibodies for serological detection of CaLas because it is present in high concentration on the surface of all cells of CaLas and the protein is generally conserved40. Polyclonal antibodies are able to recognize multiple epitopes within a single antigen. If some epitopes were shared between the strain of a pathogen used for immunization and the strain being diagnosed, cross-reactivity would be inevitable41. In the present study, we report the optimization of the working dilutions of both the anti-OmpA Pab rabbit antibody and the goat anti-rabbit secondary Pab. The optimal dilution for the anti-OmpA Pab was determined to be 1:5000. When the concentration of the anti OmpA Pab was too high, false positive results in the healthy controls were observed in the tissue prints. As the anti OmpA Pab was diluted more than 1:5000, it still produced good color signal in the phloem cells. Similar results were observed with the secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody. If diluted too much, no specific signal was detected, especially when the CaLas was at low levels. Taken together, the best concentration for anti-OmpA antibody was when diluted at 1:5000 and for the secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody when diluted at 1:50,000. We also describe the development of IC-PCR using the antibody and show how the results of qPCR, IC-PCR and tissue printing are correlated. In recent work, we have shown that the OmpA rabbit antibody is useful to study the distribution of CaLas in infected citrus trees42.

Tissue printing is one of the most widely used and simple techniques for cell-specific location of various macromolecules, such as proteins, enzymes, nucleic acids, or soluble metabolites in plant or animal cells43. The basic principle of tissue printing is that most of the cell contents, especially on the surface of a freshly cut tissue section, can be transferred to an adhesive or absorptive surface with little or no diffusion, by simple contact43 with excellent preservation of anatomical detail. The technique was used with nitrocellulose paper to localize extensin molecules in soybean tissue sections based on detection with silver or gold labeled antibodies44. Tissue printing has also been applied for the detection of RNA molecules45. Tissue printing has been widely applied to study the distribution and localization of viroids, viruses and bacteria in plants45,46. The tissue printing method also scales well and has the advantage of being easy to learn for inexperienced personnel who may take the samples in the field47.

Nucleic acid based probes were recently applied for the detection of CaLas in citrus plants and psyllids48 in tissue blots. These workers prepared tissue blots of nucleic acid extracts of infected plant material and then used a digoxygenin labeled probe and an anti-DIG labeled antibody to detect CaLas immobilized on the membranes. Anatomical resolution was lost in these tissue blots, unlike in our tissue prints. Others have spotted nucleic acid extracts from CaLas infected plants onto membranes and detected CaLas by PCR starting with the spotted nucleic acids on the membranes as template. The sensitivity and specificity of this method were as good as the qPCR assays used to detect the pathogen, avoided cumbersome purification of DNA prior to qPCR, and CaLas was detected in both symptomatic and asymptomatic leaf tissue49, with levels of detection similar to ours reported here. Our method has advantages of ease of implementation and the preservation of anatomical resolution, which increases the sensitivity of the assay, since a single infected phloem cells can be visualized. We also compared the results of tissue prints from symptomatic and asymptomatic leaf petioles with qPCR of DNA extracts prepared from the same petioles. We could detect the presence of CaLas in tissue prints from asymptomatic leaves from infected trees, even when the qPCR failed to detect the pathogen.

The anti-OmpA based tissue print technique also clearly showed details of the in situ distribution pattern of CaLas in different tissues of citrus42. As compared to tissue prints of sections of petioles, stems and seeds, the apparent concentration of CaLas in primary roots was lower. CaLas has been reported to colonize secondary roots prior to the development of visible foliar symptoms28, but such colonized secondary roots may die before visible symptoms occur, and thus would be unavailable for tissue printing. The concentration of viable CaLas in leaves was much higher than in primary roots24,28, consistent with this interpretation.

The tissue print assay requires viable cells, or at least cells with intact membranes, to present OmpA to the anti-OmpA Pab. Previous reports based on qPCR assays have demonstrated uneven distribution of CaLas cells in different tissues of infected sweet orange trees24,25. Our results provide a visual confirmation of this, and also provide previously unavailable anatomical resolution of the distribution of CaLas. The basis of organ or tissue preference in the colonization of citrus by CaLas remains unknown, and this technique could be applied to address this question.

Immune capture-PCR (IC-PCR) is a method that combines the advantages of antibody recognition of the pathogen with the amplification power of PCR. IC-PCR is a powerful method for detecting low quantities of protein antigens50,51. For the present study, in order to confirm that the anti-OmpA Pab can specifically capture CaLas from crude plant extracts, IC-PCR was performed following published methods50. The optimum detection of CaLas with IC-PCR using primer pair OI1/OI2c, was with the anti-OmpA Pab diluted at 1:200 and with plant extract volumes of 100 μl–200 μl. qPCR was used separately to estimate the number of CaLas genomes present in the plant extracts with a regression equation52. There was a general correlation between the concentration of CaLas estimated by qPCR in the crude extracts and the capture efficiency of anti-OmpA Pab based on the amount of amplification product produced following IC-PCR. When the Cq value was close to 25 (2.3 × 106 copies of CaLas per gram of plant tissue), there was no visible amplification product following IC-PCR, suggesting that this is the practical limit of the technique. Immune capture of a PCR target is less expensive and easier to perform than the commonly used methods for the purification of DNA from infected plants prior to PCR. As noted above, IC-PCR and tissue printing would be expected to capture only viable cells with intact membranes using the anti OmpA Pab, in contrast to qPCR of total DNA recovered from infected plants, which would include DNA from both living and dead cells. Thus the results of the different assays are expected to be incompletely correlated.

Testing of field samples using the tissue print method was followed by qPCR on the same tissue sections. When plainly symptomatic leaf samples were tested, qPCR produced positive results on 98.0% of the samples, and only 73% of the same samples were positive by tissue printing. However, when asymptomatic leaf samples from the same trees were tested, the relative efficiencies of the two methods were reversed: qPCR produced positive results for only 64% of the samples, but tissue printing produced positive results for 83% of the samples. Thus the relative efficiencies of the two methods make them complementary and can be explained by the presence of both living and dead CaLas in plant tissues29. In symptomatic CaLas-infected citrus samples, the proportion of viable cells was only 17–31%. The DNA-based qPCR technique detects DNA from both living and dead cells53, whereas the antibody-based tissue printing method detects OmpA only in viable cells with intact membranes. Thus in symptomatic tissues, the concentration of DNA targets for qPCR would be higher than the concentration of antigenic targets for serological detection using this Pab. When asymptomatic leaf samples from known CaLas-positive trees were tested, higher Cq values indicated a lower concentration of CaLas cells, but the tissue printing indicated that most of CaLas were living and had intact membranes. When either symptomatic or asymptomatic samples were tested, both qPCR and tissue printing were about 80% efficient in detecting CaLas. Notably, the results were complementary so that when the two methods were combined, CaLas was detected in about 95% of the samples tested.

We have tried to use our anti-OmpA Pab in a standard DAS-ELISA format (unpublished data) but have been unsuccessful, despite our successful results with the Pab using the tissue printing format. We interpret this to mean that although the population of CaLas may have been high in individual phloem cells, in the plant tissues as a whole the population of viable CaLas was below the detection threshold for ELISA.

In conclusion, we have developed and validated a rapid and simple tissue print method for the serological detection of CaLas and demonstrated that it can be used to test field samples. Compared to qPCR, the current standard for detection of CaLas, it is easier to perform, much less expensive, readily scalable for many samples, equally reliable overall and is especially suited for detection of CaLas in asymptomatic tissues where their concentration is low. The tissue printing method described can also be used to rapidly and comprehensively detect viable CaLas in infected citrus trees. Our IC-PCR method also uses the anti-OmpA Pab to remove CaLas from crude plant extracts, which eliminates the need for DNA purification prior to PCR. The tissue printing assay is shown to be complementary to qPCR-based methods for detection of CaLas in infected trees, and when the methods are combined, both symptomatic and asymptomatic leaf samples from HLB affected trees can be confirmed to be positive for the pathogen at a 95% rate.


Plant Materials and Pathogens

Trees infected with ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ were propagated by bud inoculation of either rough lemon (Citrus jambhiri Lush.) seedlings or sweet orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck) propagated on rough lemon rootstocks. CaLas infected periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus) samples were propagated by branch graft inoculation to healthy periwinkle seedlings. All plants were grown in Metro Mix 510 potting mix in a greenhouse. The temperature of the greenhouse was maintained at 65–80F (18–27C) and ambient light was supplemented with high-pressure sodium vapor lighting on cloudy days and throughout the winter season to extend the photoperiod. Plants were watered as needed with water containing nitrogen/phosphorus/potassium (100/25/100 ppm), copper (2 ppm) and iron (6 ppm).

Field samples of ‘Valencia’ sweet orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck) including symptomatic and asymptomatic leaf samples, root and fruit samples were obtained from groves in Florida.

Preparation of anti-OmpA polyclonal antibodies

The rabbit polyclonal antibody (Pab) was prepared as described32.

Tissue prints

HLB-affected and symptomatic leaves and corresponding healthy controls were collected from the greenhouse and kept on ice before preparing tissue prints. Tissue printing was performed according to a modified published protocol47. Sections approximately 2 mm thick were cut from the petioles of diseased or healthy tissue and pressed (10~15 seconds) onto nitrocellulose membranes (Whatman; 0.22 μm pore size). The membranes were air dried for 5 minutes at room temperature and then transferred to phosphate buffered saline with 0.05%Tween-20 (PBST) and washed two times (five minutes each) on a reciprocal shaker (80–100 rpm). The PBST was removed and replaced with SuperBlock (PBS) Blocking Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for initial blocking at room temperature for 2 h. The membranes were transferred to a standard blocking solution (PBST + 5% fat free skim milk) that contained the rabbit anti-OmpA Pab at different dilutions from 1:500, to 1:10,000 and incubated for 90 minutes at 37 C. Membranes were then washed three times with PBST for 10 min each. A secondary goat anti-rabbit polyclonal antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase was serially diluted from 1:10,000 to1:100,000, and incubated with the membranes for 1 h at 37 C. The tissue prints were washed three times with PBST for 10 min each before substrate was added (33 μl NBT + 16.5 μl BCIP; Sigma) in 5 ml of alkaline phosphate assay buffer. Incubation was stopped when purple color development could be seen. The tissue prints were photographed with a Carl Zeiss SteREO Discovery V20 light microscope equipped with a digital camera (AxioCamHR3).

The tissue prints prepared from leaves of field samples collected from HLB groves with and without symptoms were scored as positive or negative for CaLas by three individuals with no knowledge of the symptom status of the samples. For this purpose, a single purple colored spot in the phloem ring among the three replicates of a given sample resulted in the sample being declared positive. Leaves from healthy trees collected from the greenhouse were also tested in the same manner.

Immune capture PCR (IC-PCR)

PCR tubes (0.2 ml) were pre-coated overnight at 4 C with 200 μl anti-OmpA Pab diluted (1:100, 1:200 and1:250) in ELISA coating buffer (0.1 M sodium carbonate, pH 9.5) and then washed three times with PBST to remove unbound Pabs. Extracts of CaLas-infected and healthy sweet orange and periwinkle plants were prepared by homogenizing midribs in ELISA coating buffer with 20% sucrose. Different volumes (20 μl, 50 μl, 100 μl and 200 μl) of these extracts were added by pipetting into the Pab coated 0.2 ml tubes in duplicate and also into 0.2 ml tubes that had not been pre coated with anti-OmpA Pab. Extracts of CaLas-infected plants in tubes with no Pab pre-coating as well as extracts of healthy plants in Pab coated tubes were both used as controls. The prepared samples were placed in an incubator at 37 C for 2 h, followed by two washes with PBST for 10 min each. DNA was extracted immediately from an equal volume of each starting extract for qPCR to determine the concentration of CaLas in each sample. The PCR reactions were carried out in 20 μl volumes that contained 1 × PCR reaction buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTP, 0.2 μM of forward and reverse primers (OI1/OI2c)16 and 1 U Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Frederick, MD). An extract from CaLas-infected citrus was used as the positive control. The thermal cycling program was set up in a PTC-200 (MJ Research)27.

Extraction of DNA and qPCR Assay

After tissue prints were prepared, 6 petiole sections from each sample were collected for DNA extraction with the DNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). qPCR was performed using the plant mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase (COX) gene as an internal control31. The tissue print and qPCR assays were performed in triplicate.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Ding, F. et al. Immune Tissue Print and Immune Capture-PCR for Diagnosis and Detection of Candidatus Liberibacter Asiaticus. Sci. Rep. 7, 46467; doi: 10.1038/srep46467 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information:


This work was funded by grant #551 from the Citrus Research and Development Foundation and by USDA ARS.


The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions F.D., R.B. and J.S.H. planned the research. F.D. performed the laboratory experiments. R.B. and C.P. provided plant materials and C.P. prepared the figures. F.D. and J.S.H. wrote the manuscript.


  • Bové J. M. Huanglongbing: A destructive, newly-emerging, century old disease of citrus. J. Plant Pathol. 88, 7–37 (2006).
  • Gottwald T. R. Current epidemiological understanding of citrus huanglongbing. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 48, 119–139 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Wang N. & Trivedi P. Citrus huanglongbing: A newly relevant disease presents unprecedented challenges. Phytopathology 103, 652–665 (2013). [PubMed]
  • Duan Y. et al. . Complete genome sequence of citrus huanglongbing bacterium, ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ obtained through metagenomics. MPMI 22, 1011–1020 (2009). [PubMed]
  • Hartung J. S., Shao J. & Kuykendall L. D. Comparison of the ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ genome adapted for an intracellular lifestyle with other members of the Rhizobiales. PLoS One 6, e23289 (2011). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Plotto A., Baldwin E. A., McCollum T. G. & Irey M. Effect of early detection huanglongbing on juice flavor and chemistry. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 121, 265–269 (2008).
  • Gottwald T. R., da Graça J. V. & Bassanezi R. B. Citrus huanglongbing: The pathogen and its impact. Plant Health Progress, doi: (2007).10.1094/PHP-2007-0906-01-RV [Cross Ref]
  • Hansen A. K., Trumble J. T., Stouthamer R. & Paine T. D. New huanglongbing (HLB) Candidatus species, ‘Ca. Liberibacter psyllaurus’, found to infect tomato and potato is vectored by the psyllid Bactericera cockerelli (Sulc). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 5862–5865 (2008). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Liefting L. W., Weir B. S., Pennycook S. R. & Clover G. R. G. Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’, associated with plants in the Solanaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59, 2274–2276 (2009). [PubMed]
  • Nissinen A. I., Haapalainen M., Jauhianen L., Lindman M. & Pirhonen M. Different symptoms in carrots caused by male and female carrot psyllid feeding and infection by ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’. Plant Pathology 63, 812–820 (2014).
  • da Graça J. V. et al. . Huanglongbing in Texas: Report on the first detections in commercial citrus. J. Citrus Pathol. 2 27939 (2015).
  • Stokstad E. Dread citrus disease turns up in California and Texas. Science 336, 283–284 (2012). [PubMed]
  • Stansly P. A. et al. . Vector control and foliar nutrition to maintain economic sustainability of bearing citrus in Florida groves affected by huanglongbing. Pest Manag. Sci., 70 415–426 (2013). [PubMed]
  • Rouse B. Rehabilitation of HLB Infected citrus trees using severe pruning and nutritional sprays. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 126, 51–54 (2013).
  • Ding F. et al. . Infection of wampee and lemon by citrus Huanglongbing pathogen (Candidatus Liberobacter Asiaticus) in China. J. Plant Pathol. 87, 207–212 (2005).
  • Jagoueix S., Bové J. M. & Garnier M. PCR detection of the two ‘Candidatus’ liberobacter species associated with greening disease of citrus. Mol. Cell. Probes 10, 43–50 (1996). [PubMed]
  • Teixeira D. C. et al. . PCR detection of the two Liberibacter species associated with citrus Huanglongbing in São Paulo State, Brazil. Proc. 16th Conf. IOCV (eds Hilf M. E., Duran-Vila N. & Rocha-Peña M. A.) 325–340 (International Organization of Citrus Virologists, Riverside, California, 2005).
  • Li W., Hartung J. S. & Levy L. E. Quantitative real-time PCR for detection and identification of Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with citrus huanglongbing. J. Microbiol. Meth. 66, 104–115 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Morgan J. K. et al. . Improved real-time PCR detection of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus from citrus and psyllid hosts by targeting the intragenic tandem-repeats of its prophage genes. Mol. Cell. Probes 26, 90–98 (2012). [PubMed]
  • Okuda M., Matsumoto M., Tanaka Y., Subandiyah S. & Iwanami T. Characterization of the tufB-secE-nusG-rplKAJL-rpoB gene cluster of the citrus greening organism and detection by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Plant Dis. 89, 705–711 (2005).
  • Keremane M. L. et al. . A rapid field detection system for citrus huanglongbing associated ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ from the psyllid vector, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama and its implications in disease management. Crop Protection 68, 41–48 (2015).
  • Rigano L. A. et al. . Rapid and sensitive detection of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by loop mediated isothermal amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick. BMC Microbiology 14, 86 (2014). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Garnier M., Danela N. & Bové J. M. Aetiology of citrus greening disease. Ann. Microbiol. 79, 90–93 (1984).
  • Li W., Levy L. & Hartung J. S. Quantitative distribution of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in citrus plants with citrus huanglongbing. Phytopathology 99, 139–144 (2009). [PubMed]
  • Tatineni S. et al. . In planta distribution of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ as revealed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR. Phytopathology 98, 592–599 (2008). [PubMed]
  • Hartung J. S., Paul C., Achor D. & Brlansky R. H. Colonization of dodder, Cuscuta indecora, by ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ and ‘Ca. L. americanus’. Phytopathology 100, 756–762 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Achor D. S. et al. . Sequence of anatomical symptom observations in citrus affected with huanglongbing disease. Plant Pathology Journal (2010).
  • Johnson E. G., Wu J., Bright D. B. & Graham J. H. Association of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ root infection, but not phloem plugging with root loss on huanglongbing-affected trees prior to appearance of foliar symptoms. Plant Pathology 63, 290–298 (2014).
  • Trivedi P. et al. . Quantification of viable ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in hosts using quantitative PCR with the aid of ethidium monoazide (EMA). Eur. J. Plant Pathology 124, 553–563 (2009).
  • Ding F., Duan Y., Paul C., Brlansky R. H. & Hartung J. S. Localization and distribution of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in citrus and periwinkle by direct tissue blot immuno assay with an anti-OmpA polyclonal antibody. PloS One 10, e0123939 (2015). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ding F., Duan Y., Yuan Q., Shao J. & Hartung J. S. Serological detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in citrus, and identification by GeLC-MS/MS of a chaperone protein responding to cellular pathogens. Scientific Reports 6, 29272 (2016). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Converse R. H. & Martin R. R. ELISA methods for plant viruses (APS Press, St. Paul, MN, USA, 1993).
  • Loconsole G. et al. . Detection of Xylella fastidiosa in olive trees by molecular and serological methods. J. Plant Pathology 96, 7–14 (2014).
  • Gergerich R. C. et al. . Safeguarding fruit crops in the age of agricultural globalization. Plant Dis. 99, 176–187 (2015).
  • Hampton R., Ball E. & De Boer S. Serological methods for detection and identification of viral and bacterial plant pathogens (APS Press, St. Paul, MN, 1993).
  • Backett K. D., Atkinson H. J. & Forrest J. M. Stage-specific monoclonal antibodies to the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida (Stone) Behrens. J. Nematology 25 (1993). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Garnier M., Martin-Gros G. & Bové J. M. Monoclonal antibodies against the bacteria like organism associated with citrus greening disease. Ann. Inst. Pasteur/Microbiol. 138, 639–650 (1987). [PubMed]
  • Korsten L. G., Sanders G. M., Su H. J., Bové J. M. & Kotze J. M. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the IOCV (eds Moreno P., da Graça J. V. & Timmer L. W.) 224–234 (International Organization of Citrus Virologists, Riverside, California, 1993).
  • Walcott R. R. Detection of seedborne pathogens. HortTechnology 13, 40–47 (2003).
  • Bastianel C., Garnier-Semancik M., Renaudin J., Bové J. M. & Eveillard S. Diversity of “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus,” based on the omp gene sequence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 6473–6478 (2005). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Voskuil J. L. A. Commercial antibodies and their validation. F1000 Research 3, 232 (2014). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ding F., Duan Y., Paul C., Brlansky R. H. & Hartung J. S. Localization and distribution of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in citrus and periwinkle by direct tissue blot immuno assay with an anti-ompA polyclonal antibody. PLoS One 10, e0123939 (2015). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ye Z. & Varner J. E. Tissue printing. FASEB J. 8, 378–384 (1994). [PubMed]
  • Cassab G. I. & Varner J. E. Immunocytolocalization of extensin in developing soybean seed coats by immunogold-silver staining and by tissue printing on nitrocellulose paper. J. Cell Biol. 105, 2581–2588 (1987). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Amari K. et al. . Tracking hop stunt viroid infection in apricot trees during a whole year by non-isotopic tissue printing hybridisation. Acta. Hort. 550, 315–320 (2001).
  • Knapp E. et al. . Localization of fruit tree viruses by immuno-tissue printing in infected shoots of Malus sp. and Prunus sp. J. Virol. Meth. 55, 157–173 (1995). [PubMed]
  • Lopez M. M. et al. . Innovative tools for detection of plant pathogenic viruses and bacteria. Int. Microbiol. 6, 233–243 (2003). [PubMed]
  • Nageswara-Rao M. et al. . Development of rapid, sensitive and non-radioactive tissue-blot diagnostic method for the detection of citrus greening. Mol. Cell. Probes 27, 176–183 (2013). [PubMed]
  • Bertolini E. et al. . Tissue-print and squash real-time PCR for direct detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ species in citrus plants and psyllid vectors. Plant Pathology 63, 1149–1158 (2014).
  • Wetzel T., Candresse T., Macquaire G., Ravelonandro M. & Dunez J. A highly sensitive immunocapture polymerase chain reaction method for plum pox potyvirus detection. J. Virol. Meth. 39, 21–37 (1992). [PubMed]
  • Malou N. & Raoult D. Immuno-PCR: a promising ultrasensitive diagnostic method to detect antigens and antibodies. Trends Microbiol. 19, 295–302 (2011). [PubMed]
  • Li W., Li D., Twieg E., Hartung J. S. & Levy L. Optimized quantification of unculturable Candidatus Liberibacter spp. in host plants using real-time PCR. Plant Dis. 92, 854–861 (2008).
  • Nocker A. & Camper A. K. Selective removal of DNA from dead cells of mixed bacterial communities by use of ethidium monoazide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 1997–2004 (2006). [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group