PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of frontmicrobioLink to Publisher's site
 
Front Microbiol. 2017; 8: 652.
Published online 2017 April 18. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2017.00652
PMCID: PMC5394155

H-NS Mutation-Mediated CRISPR-Cas Activation Inhibits Phage Release and Toxin Production of Escherichia coli Stx2 Phage Lysogen

Abstract

Shiga toxin-converting bacteriophages (Stx phages) carry the stx gene and convert nonpathogenic bacterial strains into Shiga toxin-producing bacteria. There is limited understanding of the effect that an Escherichia coli (E. coli) clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas adaptive immune system has on Stx phage lysogen. We investigated heat-stable nucleoid-structuring (H-NS) mutation-mediated CRISPR-Cas activation and its effect on E. coli Stx2 phage lysogen. The Δhns mutant (MG1655Δhns) of the E. coli K-12 strain MG1655 was obtained. The Δhns mutant lysogen that was generated after Stx phage lysogenic infection had a repressed growth status and showed subdued group behavior, including biofilm formation and swarming motility, in comparison to the wild-type strain. The de-repression effect of the H-NS mutation on CRISPR-Cas activity was then verified. The results showed that cas gene expression was upregulated and the transformation efficiency of the wild-type CRISPR plasmids was decreased, which may indicate activation of the CRISPR-Cas system. Furthermore, the function of CRISPR-Cas on Stx2 phage lysogen was investigated by activating the CRISPR-Cas system, which contains an insertion of the protospacer regions of the Stx2 phage Min27. The phage release and toxin production of four lysogens harboring the engineered CRISPRs were investigated. Notably, in the supernatant of the Δhns mutant lysogen harboring the Min27 spacer, both the progeny phage release and the toxin production were inhibited after mitomycin C induction. These observations demonstrate that the H-NS mutation-activated CRISPR-Cas system plays a role in modifying the effects of the Stx2 phage lysogen. Our findings indicated that H-NS mutation-mediated CRISPR-Cas activation in E. coli protects bacteria against Stx2 phage lysogeny by inhibiting the phage release and toxin production of the lysogen.

Keywords: Escherichia coli, H-NS, CRISPR-Cas, Stx2 phage, Shiga toxin

Introduction

Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), especially the O157:H7 strains, are the major causes of hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) (Allison et al., 2003). Although some bacteriophage infections are lytic, temperate and lysogenic bacteriophages often integrate into the bacterial genome as a prophage causing a chronic infection of the host bacterium, known as lysogenic conversion (Zegans et al., 2009). It is known that Stx phage lysogenization of STEC promotes its pathogenicity and contributes to its viability in environmental conditions (Croxen et al., 2013). Stx2 production is reported to be associated with more severe diseases than strains that produce either Stx1 or a combination of Stx1 and Stx2 (Kleanthous et al., 1990; Pacheco and Sperandio, 2012; Kruger and Lucchesi, 2015). Clinically, the use of antibiotics to treat STEC infections has become controversial due to the stimulation of the lytic cycle and the concomitant toxin release through the bacterial SOS response (Croxen et al., 2013). As described previously, when phages infect bacterial cells, they must resist a range of antiviral mechanisms in order to thrive in most environments (Labrie et al., 2010). As an important bacteriophage resistance mechanism, a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas system plays a vital role in preventing phage infection and multiplication.

The CRISPR-Cas system is a sophisticated adaptive immune system in prokaryotes that consists of short DNA repeats separated by 26–72 bp sequences, called spacers, which are derived from viruses and other foreign DNA (van der Oost et al., 2009; Yin et al., 2013). In addition to the CRISPR-Cas system's role in adaptive immunity, its function in regulating the behavior of bacteria has also been widely reported (Westra et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015). Moreover, due to the high polymorphisms of CRISPR arrays, CRISPR sequences have been successfully used to classify a number of bacteria in investigations of infectious disease outbreaks (Liu et al., 2011; Louwen et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2017). Complementarity between mature CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) and the sequences found within phages or plasmids activate Cas proteins, which target and cleave the complementary sequence, leading to the inhibition of their infection or replication (Garneau et al., 2010; Westra et al., 2012).

In strains of Escherichia coli (E. coli), such as E. coli K-12 MG1655, the type I-E CRISPR-Cas immune system consists of two major CRISPR loci and eight cas genes: cas1, cas2, cas3, and casABCDE. However, the activity of the E. coli CRISPR-Cas system is repressed by the heat-stable nucleoid structuring (H-NS) protein, a global transcriptional repressor. As one of the most abundant proteins in the E. coli nucleoid, H-NS is also widely distributed within other gram-negative bacteria (Bloch et al., 2003; Dorman, 2004, 2014). Thus, relieving H-NS-mediated repression of cas gene transcription may be a primary prerequisite for the CRISPR-Cas system's ability to resist phage lysogenization, lysogens, and prophage induction (Pul et al., 2010; Majsec et al., 2016). Since the Stx phage plays an important role in the dissemination of Shiga toxin genes and the emergence of new STEC strains, how the CRISPR-Cas system will perform against a Stx prophage integrated into a bacterial genome must be further elucidated. In this study, the E. coli O157:H7 strain Min27 was used; this pathogenic strain, which was isolated in the field, is capable of producing Shiga toxin after induction by either mitomycin C or antibiotics, such as norfloxacin and gentamicin. The activated CRISPR system's effect on the phage release, toxin production, and other biological characters of phage lysogen were determined. Since the impact of the CRISPR-Cas system on Stx2 phage lysogen is uncertain, in this study a Δhns mutant of E. coli K-12 was generated to activate the system. Based on the general feature of spacer-protospacer matching of an E. coli CRISPR-Cas system, a Stx2 phage Min27 single lysogen of the Δhns mutant and different lysogens that harbor the engineered CRISPRs were generated. The Stx2 phage resistant function of an H-NS-mediated E. coli type I-E CRISPR-Cas system was investigated by testing the lysogenization efficiency, phage release, and Shiga toxin production. The findings suggest that the CRISPR-Cas immune system impacts the biological characteristics of Stx phage lysogen in E. coli.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains, bacteriophages, and media

The bacterial strains, bacteriophages, and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table Table1.1. E. coli K-12 strain MG1655 was used in this study. The E. coli K-12 derivative strain, MC1061, was used as a nontoxigenic host for Stx phage infections and propagation (Allison et al., 2003). The E. coli strains were routinely cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, U.K.) or LB agar (1.5%) at 37°C. The growth media were supplemented with the following antibiotics at the indicated concentrations: ampicillin (Amp), 100 μg/ml; chloramphenicol (Cm), 34 μg/ml. The Stx2 phage Min27 was obtained from E. coli O157:H7 strain Min27, which was isolated from the feces of a piglet with diarrhea at a swine farm in Shanghai, China (Su et al., 2010). Recombinant mutant phage Min27(Δstx::cat) was constructed using the lambda Red recombinase method with Stx2AB deleted, but carrying a chloramphenicol resistance cassette. This mutant phage was used in the latter experiment of lysogenic infection efficiency for colony-forming unit (CFU) counting of the lysogen on the CmR plate. The related primers used for mutation and verification of the recombinant phage are listed in Table Table22.

Table 1
E. coli K-12 bacterial strains, bacteriophages, and plasmids used in this study.
Table 2
Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.

Plasmid construction

The plasmids were constructed using standard molecular biology techniques. Standard digestion of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products and the vector by restriction enzymes was conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions. The CRISPR1 and CRISPR2 loci of MG1655 were amplified using specified primers, and then they were inserted into the BamH I-Eco R I-cleaved pGEX-6p-1 vector to generate the foreign plasmids pCRISPR1 and pCRISPR2, respectively. The construction of the plasmids pCRISPR1, pCRISPR2, the p-anti-control spacer, and the p-anti-Min27 spacer, are described in the Supplementary Material.

Δhns mutant construction

The mutant with an in-frame deletion in the hns gene was generated using the lambda Red system, as described previously (Datsenko and Wanner, 2000; Wang et al., 2011). The hns gene was replaced with a chloramphenicol resistance cassette, which was amplified from plasmid pKD3 using PCR with hns deletion primers (Table (Table2).2). The 5′ regions of the primers (50 bp) were homologous to the corresponding flanking region of the hns. The PCR products were then transformed into MG1655 containing the lambda Red recombinase expression plasmid pKD46 by electroporation. After electroporation, the samples were incubated at 37°C for 1 h in Super Optimal Broth with Catabolite repression (SOC) and plated on LB agar with chloramphenicol to select the Δhns mutants. The mutants were confirmed by PCR and sequenced using Δhns mutant verification primers. The chloramphenicol resistance cassette was cured by transforming the pCP20 plasmid into the mutant and selecting for a chloramphenicol sensitive mutant strain, which was finally designated as MG1655Δhns.

Generation of the phage lysogens and measurements of the phage titer

To generate the Stx phage lysogens, 100 μl of filtered lytic supernatants containing phage (prepared as described above) was mixed with 100 μl of E. coli K-12 MG1655 cells from an overnight LB-grown culture, and the MG1655 and phage mixture was incubated overnight at 37°C in LB medium. These bacteria-phages mixtures were then struck on plates to obtain individual colonies. The individual colonies were inoculated into liquid LB medium, grown overnight, and then assayed for the presence of phage. The lytic supernatant-containing phage was serially diluted and incubated with indicator strain MC1061 (grown in LB until OD600 reached 0.4) plus 0.01M CaCl2 at 37°C for 15 min. The cells were mixed with top agar (5 ml) and poured onto LB agar plates. After incubation at 37°C for 8 h, the phage titer expressed as plaque-forming units (PFU)/ml was calculated by counting the plaques on the plate.

Biofilm formation assay

Biofilm formation assays were performed using a previously described, 96-well plate method with some modifications (Schembri and Klemm, 2001; Skyberg et al., 2007). In brief, single lysogens were grown to stationary phase in LB at 37°C and then diluted 1:100 in LB supplemented with 5 g/L glucose. Aliquots of 200 μl for each dilution were dispensed per well into a microtiter plate. The negative-control wells contained uninoculated medium. The plates were cultured aerobically at 37°C without shaking for 24 h. The medium of the plates was then poured off, and the plates were triple-washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The microplates were then stained with 200 μl of 1% (w/v) crystal violet for 30 min, washed three times with PBS to remove the unbound crystal violet dye, and air dried for 1 h. After drying, the adherent cells were re-solubilized with 200 μl of 30% acetic acid. The absorbance was measured at 550 nm in a microplate (ELISA) reader (BioTek, ELx800). All tests were carried out three times independently, and the results were analyzed statistically.

Swarming mobility assay

Swarming assays were performed as reported previously (Toutain et al., 2005; Su et al., 2010). The swarming motility of the single lysogens was tested by inoculating 5 μl of an overnight, LB-grown culture onto a swarming plate followed by incubation at 37°C for 48 h. A semisolid medium containing 0.5% agar was supplemented with 0.5% D-(+)-glucose. The swarming motility plates were prepared and used at the same day, after solidification of agar, they were dried for 5 min under sterile air and then inoculated.

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR

The bacteria were grown to the logarithmic phase, and RNA was isolated using the E.Z.N.A. bacterial RNA isolation kit (Omega, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Contaminated DNA was removed from the samples with RNase-free DNase I (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and cDNA synthesis was performed using the Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed to determine the transcription levels of the cas genes using SYBR Green MasterMix (DBI Bioscience, Ludwigshafen, Germany) and gene-specific primers (Table (Table2),2), and the data were normalized with the housekeeping gene tmRNA transcript. The relative fold change was calculated using the threshold cycle (2−ΔΔCT) method.

Transformation efficiency assay

The E. coli MG1655 and MG1655Δhns cultures were incubated at 37°C until an OD600 of 0.5–0.6 was reached. The bacteria were then centrifuged at 4,000 × g at 4°C, the supernatants were disposed, and the bacteria were resuspended in 1 ml ice-cold 10% glycerol, and then transferred to a 1.5 ml tube. After additional washing steps, the cells were suspended in 200 μl ice-cold 10% glycerol. The bacterial cells (50 μL) were then mixed in an ice-cold 0.2 mm electroporation cuvette (Bio-Rad) with 2 μg of the pVEC, pCRISPR1, or pCRISPR2 plasmids. The mixture was pulsed in a Bio-Rad MicroPulser at 200 Ω, 25 μF, and 1.8 kV. Immediately after the pulse, 1 ml of SOC broth was added, and the cells were aerated for 2 h at 37°C. Various dilutions of the reaction were plated on LB agar plates supplemented with 100 μg/ml Ampcillin. The plates were incubated overnight at 37°C. The colonies emerging on the selection plates were counted, and the CFU number per microgram plasmid was calculated, accordingly.

Lytic and lysogenic infection efficiency assay

The E. coli MG1655 and MG1655Δhns cultures harboring the engineered CRISPRs (containing either the control spacer or the Min27 spacer) (FQ1, FQ2, FQ3, and FQ4 in Table Table1)1) were incubated at 37°C until an OD600 of 0.5–0.6 was reached. All the strains were normalized to OD600 = 0.6, and the CFU was also counted and calculated on the AmpR plate. For lytic infection, aliquot supernatants containing infectious Min27 phage particle was added to 5 ml of the normalized cultures and then cultured aerobically at 37°C with shaking for 12 h, respectively. The cultures were then centrifuged at 4,000 × g for 5 min, and the supernatants were used to determine the phage titer via PFU assay. The efficiency of the plating (EOP) (EOP = phage titer on test bacterium/phage titer on indicator bacterium MC1061) was also measured. For the lysogenic infection, the recombinant mutant phage Min27(Δstx::cat), which carries a chloramphenicol resistance cassette, was used. A total of 100 μl of the filtered phage Min27(Δstx::cat) was mixed with 100 μl of the E. coli MG1655 and MG1655Δhns cultures harboring the engineered CRISPRs, and the mixtures were incubated overnight at 37°C. These bacterium-phage mixtures were then struck on AmpR (lysogens and non-lysogens cells) or AmpR plus CmR (lysogens) plates to obtain individual colonies and to calculate the CFUs.

Phage release of the lysogens

The lysogens harboring the engineered CRISPR (FQ5, FQ6, FQ7, and FQ8) and the control strains were induced to release the phage by exposing the mid-exponential-phase cultures (all normalized to OD600 = 0.6) of the representative ampicillin-resistant colonies to mitomycin C (0.5 μg/ml) (Sigma) (4) for 12 h. The progeny phage titer was determined using the PFU assay described above. Furthermore, the lysogen survival rate after mitomycin C induction was also calculated using CFU counting.

Vero cell viability assay

The Vero cells were plated at 104/well on 96-well plates in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, and then incubated overnight at 37°C under 5% CO2. Four lysogens FQ5, FQ6, FQ7, and FQ8 were induced to release the phage and Shiga toxin by exposing the mid-exponential-phase cultures (all normalized to OD600 = 0.6) of the representative ampicillin-resistant colonies to mitomycin C (0.5 μg/ml) (Sigma) (4) for 12 h. Serial 10-fold dilutions of the filtered (0.22 μm filter) supernatants in DMEM medium were prepared. Dilutions (10−1–10−4) were added to the cell monolayer (100 μl/well) and incubated for 48 h at 37°C under 5% CO2. The viability of the Vero cells was determined via crystal violet staining. All data was represented as the average of triplicate assays. A lysogen without cytotoxic effect, MG1655ΦMin27(Δstx::cat), was used as a negative control.

Western blot analysis

A total of 10 ml the lysogens harboring the engineered CRISPR (FQ5, FQ6, FQ7, and FQ8) were induced to release the phage and Shiga toxin by exposing the cultures (all normalized to OD600 = 0.6) of the representative ampicillin-resistant colonies to mitomycin C (0.5 μg/ml) for 12 h. The filtered supernatants were collected and then subjected to saturated ammonium sulfate precipitation. The mixture of the supernatants and the saturated ammonium sulfate (1:1) was gently shaken at 4°C for 6 h. The resulting precipitation was dissolved in 1 ml PBS after centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min. The prepared samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and then examined via Western blot analysis using the Stx2 monoclonal antibody (MAb) 11E10 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, USA), as previously described (Smith et al., 2009).

Statistical analyses

The reported differences were analyzed using either Student's t-test (Figure 2B) or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Figure 6A). The analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 5 software. A P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

H-NS deletion mediates E. coli K-12 CRISPR-Cas activation

It has been reported that, under laboratory conditions, transcription of the Cascade genes in the E. coli CRISPR-Cas system is repressed by H-NS (Edgar and Qimron, 2010; Pul et al., 2010; Majsec et al., 2016). In order to investigate the interactions between CRISPR-Cas and phage lysogen, a mutant with hns gene in-frame deletion was generated (Figure (Figure1A).1A). To study the effect of hns deletion on CRISPR-Cas activation and cas gene expression, the transcription levels of the wild-type MG1655 and the Δhns strain cas genes in the mid-exponential growth phase were examined via real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The Δhns strain revealed a significant upregulation of the transcriptions of casABCDE, cas1, cas2, and cas3 (average 5-fold difference) than the wild-type strain (Figure (Figure1B).1B). These results are consistent with the findings reported in previous studies (Westra et al., 2010), indicating that cas gene transcription is closely associated with H-NS.

Figure 1
H-NS deletion mediates E. coli K-12 CRISPR-Cas activation. (A) The mutant with an in-frame deletion in the hns gene was generated and verified by PCR. Line M indicates a DL5000 DNA marker; Line WT indicates the wild-type strain. Lines 1, 2, 3, and 4 indicate ...

It has been demonstrated that the CRISPR-Cas system provided protection against invading mobile genetic elements (MGEs), such as plasmids and phages (Barrangou and Marraffini, 2014; Barrangou, 2015). To further verify that H-NS deletion mediates CRISPR-Cas activation, the transformation efficiency of the foreign plasmids that carry the homologous spacer with E. coli CRISPR loci was determined. Plasmids harboring two CRISPR loci, known as CRISPR1 and CRISPR2, as well as an empty vector, were transformed into the Δhns mutant and wild-type strains, and the transformation efficiencies were calculated, respectively. The plasmid containing the CRISPR1 sequences (with the same protospacer against the CRISPR1 loci) transformed into the Δhns mutant with an efficiency that was approximately 0.35% of the efficiency of the empty vector, but no obvious difference in transformation efficiency was observed in the wild-type strain (Figure (Figure1C).1C). Similarly, transformation of the plasmids containing the CRISPR2 protospacer into MG1655Δhns was reduced by around 90% in comparison to the empty vector. In contrast, no reduction in the transformation efficiency was observed for the plasmids when they were introduced into the wild-type strain (Figure (Figure1C).1C). These results clearly demonstrate that the proposed E. coli CRISPR-Cas system is active against foreign plasmids after relieving the hns repression.

H-NS regulates the group behavior of the E. coli Stx2 phage lysogen

To access the possible role of H-NS mutation-mediated CRISPR-Cas immunity in regulating these bacterial group behaviors, we evaluated the biofilm formation and swarming motility ability of the Stx2 phage lysogenic wild-type and Δhns mutant strains. The results showed that the swarming mobility of the Δhns mutant lysogen was extremely inhibited in comparison to the wild-type Min27 phage lysogen (Figure (Figure2A).2A). In bacteria lysogenized with bacteriophage Min27, the Δhns mutant lysogen showed decreased biofilm formation ability in comparison to the wild-type Min27 phage lysogen (Figure (Figure2B).2B). Biofilm formation is another type of bacterial group behavior. The results suggest that lysogeny by Stx phage Min27 interferes with at least two E. coli group behaviors. It was also observed that lysogenic infection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 with bacteriophage DMS3 inhibits bacterial group behaviors, such as biofilm formation and swarming motility, which were later demonstrated to be associated with the CRISPPR-Cas system function (Zegans et al., 2009). These observations indicate that the activated E. coli CRISPR-Cas system may also be involved in inhibiting the group behavior of the Stx2 phage lysogen.

Figure 2
H-NS regulates the group behavior of the E. coli Stx2 phage lysogen. The biofilm formation and swarming motility ability of the Stx2 phage lysogenic wild-type and Δhns mutant strains were assessed. (A) Swarming motility of the single lysogens ...

Activated CRISPR-Cas inhibits phage replication

To evaluate the possible function of CRISPR-Cas-associated immunity in inhibiting the replication of phages in the E. coli K-12 stains, four strains of the wild-type and Δhns mutant harboring the engineered CRISPRs (containing either the control spacer or the Min27 phage-derived spacer) were generated: FQ1, FQ2, FQ3, and FQ4. These were used to detect their ability to hamper phage propagation (Figure (Figure3A).3A). After infecting the strains with the Stx2 phage Min27, progeny phage titer in the hns-deleted strain harboring the Min27 phage-derived spacer showed a nearly 100-fold decrease in comparison to the other strains, 12 h post-infection (Figure (Figure3B).3B). Further evidence showing that H-NS mediates CRISPR-based immunity against the Stx2 phage was obtained using the efficiency of plaquing (EOP) assay. After introducing the Min27-derived spacer CRISPR plasmid into the Δhns mutant (FQ4), it reduced the sensitivity to the Stx2 phage Min27 by 100-fold, in contrast to the wild-type strain or the strains harboring the control spacer CRISPR plasmid (FQ1, FQ2 and FQ3) (Figure (Figure3C).3C). These data show that the hns mutation containing the Min27 phage-derived spacer plasmid led to a dramatic CRISPR-Cas-mediated inhibition of phage Min27 replication (Figure (Figure3A),3A), and it also contributed to a reduction in the efficiency of plaquing (Figure (Figure3C3C).

Figure 3
Activated CRISPR-Cas inhibits phage replication. (A) Schematic diagram of the engineered CRISPRs. The sequence of the anti-Min27 spacers is taken from the genome of the Stx phage Min27. Repeats are the same as the CRISPR loci in MG1655. The spacers are ...

Activated CRISPR-Cas represses phage lysogenic infection

To further elucidate the immune mechanism of CRISPR-Cas against the Stx2 phage, which is mediated by H-NS, the recombinant mutant phage Min27(Δstx::cat) was used to lysogenically infect the wild-type and Δhns mutant, each of which were harboring the engineered CRISPRs (FQ1, FQ2, FQ3, and FQ4), respectively. Then, the lysogenic infection efficiency of the Stx2 phage against the above strains was evaluated by counting the CFUs. The stx2 gene from the toxin operon was interrupted by a chloramphenicol resistance cassette (see Materials and Methods), which is convenient for counting the CFUs. After infection, the bacterium-phage mixtures were serial-diluted and then plated onto AmpR (lysogenic and non-lysogenic cells) or AmpR plus CmR (lysogenic cells) plates to obtain individual colonies and to calculate the CFU count, respectively. As shown in Figure Figure4,4, there was no significant difference among the CFU counts for the lysogenic and non-lysogenic cells grown on the AmpR plates, which may indicate that the phage had initiated the lysogenic cycle, so that it did not result in a great mass of bacterial lysis. However, for the AmpR plus CmR plates, on which the lysogenic cells were screened and counted, the efficiency of the lysogenic infection against FQ4 was greatly reduced (~102 times) in comparison to the other three strains (FQ1, FQ2, and FQ3) (Figure (Figure4).4). These data imply that the activated CRISPR-Cas system in the Δhns E. coli MG1655 strain strongly dampens the lysogenic infection of the Stx2 phage.

Figure 4
Activated CRISPR-Cas represses the Stx phage lysogenic infection. The recombinant mutant phage Min27(Δstx::cat) was used to lysogenically infect wild-type and Δhns mutant MG1655 strains harboring the engineered CRISPRs (containing either ...

Phage release of the lysogen was targeted by CRISPR-Cas system

To evaluate the effect of the CRISPR-Cas system on the phage release of the lysogens, mitomycin C was added to the culture to induce phage release. Then, the titers of the supernatants containing the phages were determined. As shown in Figure Figure5,5, the phage titer produced by the Min27 phage lysogen with the CRISPR plasmid carrying the anti-Min27 spacers (FQ8) was approximately 100-times lower than the Δhns lysogen with the control spacer (FQ7). It was also observed that the phage titer of the wild-type lysogen harboring either Min27 spacer (FQ6) or the control spacer (FQ5) was not remarkably affected. This result indicates that the phage release of the lyosgen harboring the Min27 spacers is targeted by the H-NS-mediated CRISPR activity. Thus, the presence of spacers derived from the phage Min27 is harmful for Δhns mutant lysogen in the phage release after mitomycin C induction.

Figure 5
Phage release of the lysogens was determined by PFU assay. Mitomycin C was added to the culture of lysogens to induce phage release. SL indicates the Stx phage Min27 single lysogen; SLΔhns, Stx phage Min27 single lysogen with hns deletion.

Shiga toxin expression of the lysogen was blocked by the CRISPR-Cas system

Since the activated CRISPR-Cas system exerts an influence on the phage release of the lysogen, the Shiga toxin expression of the lysogen after induction might also be affected by the CRISPR activity. To verify the effect of CRISPR-Cas, the cytotoxic effect of the supernatants on Vero cells was measured and the Shiga toxin expression was evaluated via Western blot analysis using Stx2 monoclonal antibody (11E10), respectively. To evaluate the potential damage induced by Shiga toxin, the cytotoxicity was evaluated in Vero cells. The Vero cell viability assay results showed that, although the cell death in the Δhns mutant lysogen containing the Min27 spacer (FQ8) was only about 20%, on average, the cell death caused by the culture supernatants from the other three lysogens (FQ5, FQ6, and FQ7) was approximately 40%. In comparison to the other lysogens, the cytotoxic effect of FQ8 was significantly alleviated (Figure (Figure6A).6A). As a control, the supernatants of the recombinant mutant Min27 phage lysogen, MG1655ΦMin27(Δstx::cat) with no Shiga toxin expression, showed inconspicuous toxicity to the cells. This confirms that the cell death was mainly caused by the Shiga toxin. Likewise, Western blot analysis of the Shiga toxin expression also demonstrated that, with hns deletion, the reduction of Shiga toxin production was greater in the single lysogen harboring the Min27 spacer than it was in the other lysogens, indicating that H-NS mutation-mediated CRISPR-Cas activity was involved in blocking Shiga toxin expression (Figure (Figure6B6B).

Figure 6
Shiga toxin production of the lysogen was measured using a Vero cell viability assay and Western blot analysis. (A) Serial 10-fold dilutions of the filtered supernatants were added to the cell monolayer (100 μl/well) and incubated for 48 h at ...

Discussion

H-NS is an abundant bacterial protein with DNA and RNA binding activity, and it has been found to be involved in the process of gene transcription silencing (Brescia et al., 2004; Dorman, 2004, 2014). Moreover, the effect of the bacterial H-NS protein on gene expression is overwhelmingly negative (Dorman, 2004). In E. coli, H-NS inhibits the transcription of the precursor crRNA by binding to the AT-rich CRISPR leader promoter to repress the immune activity of type I-E CRISPR-Cas against phages and plasmids (Pul et al., 2010; Medina-Aparicio et al., 2011). Pul et al. (2010) reported that casA and CRISPR expression is repressed by H-NS in E. coli. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the Stx2 phage lysogen and E. coli CRISPR-Cas immune activity based on an H-NS-deficient strain. Since we did not obtain an E. coli K-12 Δhns mutant strain from the Keio collection, an hns gene in-frame deletion mutant was generated. The transcription levels of the cas gene were upregulated in the H-NS deficient strain in comparison to the wild-type strain (Figure (Figure1B),1B), which is similar to the findings reported in a previous study (Pul et al., 2010). This result indicates that, by relieving the H-NS repression, the E. coli CRISPR-Cas system seems to be activated. Moreover, the results of the transformation efficiency of the foreign plasmids carrying the homologous spacer into both the wild-type and the Δhns mutant strains further confirmed that H-NS deletion mediates CRISPR-Cas activation (Figure (Figure1C).1C). These data provide experimental evidence that the Δhns mutant strain, which we generated, was CRISPR-activated, and it can be used in further CRISPR-Cas associated investigations.

In addition to the function of adaptive immunity, the CRISPR-Cas system has also been reported to be involved in modulating other processes, such as the genetic regulation of group behavior and virulence, DNA repairing, and genome evolution (Westra et al., 2014). It is important to note that Zegans et al. (2009) observed that lysogenic infection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 with bacteriophage DMS3 inhibits biofilm formation and swarming motility, both of which are important bacterial group behaviors. This suggests that CRISPR-Cas plays a role in modifying the effects of lysogeny on Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Zegans et al., 2009). Interestingly, the biofilm formation and swarming motility ability of the Stx2 phage lysogenic Δhns mutant strains were significantly decreased in comparison to the wild-type lysogen. Although additional investigation is necessary, it is possible that the type I-E CRISPR-Cas system may exert some influence on the regulation of group behavior in Stx2 phage lysogens.

In E. coli, and many other types of bacteria, a specialized ribonucleoprotein complex, known as the Cascade, confers immunity by an interference reaction between the CRISPR-transcript RNA (crRNA) and the invader DNA sequences, known as protospacers. The Cascade recognizes the invader DNA via short protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences and crRNA-DNA complementarity (Majsec et al., 2016). Given that the CRISPR system acts against the prophage and the CRISPR system was activated when the hns was deleted, it could protect lysogens from prophage induction and Shiga toxin production. In this study, according to the spacer matching requirements of the CRISPR-Cas interference process, based on the PAM sequence, four protospacers were selected from the phage Min27 genome to construct an engineered CRISPR plasmid. The results show that, in the single lysogen of Min27 phage, which was harboring the phage genome-derived spacers, both progeny phage release and Shiga toxin production were inhibited with the hns deletion in comparison to the control lysogen. It has also been shown that the lysogenic infection efficiency of recombinant mutant phage Min27(Δstx::cat) against FQ4 (Δhns mutant harboring Min27 phage spacers) is much lower than it is in FQ1, FQ2, and FQ3 (other three stains). A previous study reported that even low CRISPR activity is still toxic to lysogenic cells carrying targeted spacers (Edgar and Qimron, 2010). Therefore the reduction of phage release and Shiga toxin production might result from CRISPR-activity-meditated bacterial cell death. The bacterial death may be a result of the targeting and neutralization of prophage DNA, leading to bacterial DNA destruction by CRISPR-Cas activity (Edgar and Qimron, 2010). In fact, the survival rate of the lysogens harboring the engineered CRISPR plasmids after mitomycin C induction was detected in our study. It was shown that the survival rate of FQ8 was much lower than the survival rate of FQ7 (data not shown). Although it is possible that the CRISPR system may affect the level of the CI repressor in the cell, which leads to the induction of the prophage, this possibility was ruled out experimentally (Edgar and Qimron, 2010). Another possible explanation is that, in the case of Stx phage, the induction of Stx prophages has been shown to be controlled by the RecA-a regulator of the SOS bacterial response (Kruger and Lucchesi, 2015; Sheng et al., 2016). It has been shown that the interaction of the Type I-F CRISPR system with the phage protospacer induces expression of the SOS-regulated phage-related genes through the activity of the nuclease Cas3 and subsequent RecA activation (Heussler et al., 2015). In this present study, the H-NS-mediated CRISPR-Cas activity might also affect the RecA gene expression in order to regulate Stx prophage induction and Shiga toxin production. A previous study indicated that since bacteria can use quorum sensing to regulate their antiphage activities, they could specifically upregulate their defense mechanisms to avoid infection (Høyland-Kroghsbo et al., 2013). Another possibility is that quorum sensing played an essential role in regulating the type I (type I-E/I-F) CRISPR-Cas system, which may affect phage lysogen biological characteristics (Patterson et al., 2016; Høyland-Kroghsbo et al., 2017). Further study is needed to determine the mechanism by which intermediates regulate the CRISPR-Cas system on Shiga toxin production, and to verify if quorum sensing participates in controlling CRISPR adaptive immunity to Stx phage lysogen.

Author contributions

JS, YY, and QF conceived and designed the experiments; QF and SL performed the experiments; QF, ZW, JM, and YC analyzed the data; QF, YY, WS, and HW contributed reagents and materials; QF and JS wrote the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dr. Daxin Peng of Yangzhou University for providing the lambda recombination system. This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31272580, 31372500, 31672524, 31571932).

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00652/full#supplementary-material

References

  • Allison H. E., Sergeant M. J., James C. E., Saunders J. R., Smith D. L., Sharp R. J., et al. . (2003). Immunity profiles of wild-type and recombinant shiga-like toxin-encoding bacteriophages and characterization of novel double lysogens. Infect. Immun. 71, 3409–3418. 10.1128/IAI.71.6.3409-3418.2003 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Barrangou R. (2015). The roles of CRISPR-Cas systems in adaptive immunity and beyond. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 32, 36–41. 10.1016/j.coi.2014.12.008 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Barrangou R., Marraffini L. A. (2014). CRISPR-Cas systems: prokaryotes upgrade to adaptive immunity. Mol. Cell 54, 234–244. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.011 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bloch V., Yang Y., Margeat E., Chavanieu A., Augé M. T., Robert B., et al. . (2003). The H-NS dimerization domain defines a new fold contributing to DNA recognition. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10, 212–218. 10.1038/nsb904 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brescia C. C., Kaw M. K., Sledjeski D. D. (2004). The DNA binding protein H-NS binds to and alters the stability of RNA in vitro and in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 339, 505–514. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.067 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Croxen M. A., Law R. J., Scholz R., Keeney K. M., Wlodarska M., Finlay B. B. (2013). Recent advances in understanding enteric pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 26, 822–880. 10.1128/CMR.00022-13 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Datsenko K. A., Wanner B. L. (2000). One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 6640–6645. 10.1073/pnas.120163297 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dorman C. J. (2004). H-NS: a universal regulator for a dynamic genome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 391–400. 10.1038/nrmicro883 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dorman C. J. (2014). H-NS-like nucleoid-associated proteins, mobile genetic elements and horizontal gene transfer in bacteria. Plasmid 75, 1–11. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2014.06.004 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Edgar R., Qimron U. (2010). The Escherichia coli CRISPR system protects from lambda lysogenization, lysogens, and prophage induction. J. Bacteriol. 192, 6291–6294. 10.1128/JB.00644-10 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fu Q., Sun J., Yan Y. (2015). [The functional aspects of bacterial CRISPR-cas systems and interactions between phages and its bacterial hosts–a review]. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 55, 251–257. 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20140353 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fu Q., Su Z., Cheng Y., Wang Z., Li S., Wang H., et al. . (2017). Clustered, regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) diversity and virulence factor distribution in avian Escherichia coli. Res. Microbiol. 168, 147–156. 10.1016/j.resmic.2016.10.002 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Garneau J. E., Dupuis M. È., Villion M., Romero D. A., Barrangou R., Boyaval P., et al. . (2010). The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature 468, 67–71. 10.1038/nature09523 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Heussler G. E., Cady K. C., Koeppen K., Bhuju S., Stanton B. A., O'Toole G. A. (2015). Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat-dependent, biofilm-specific death of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mediated by increased expression of phage-related genes. mBio 6, e00129–15. 10.1128/mBio.00129-15 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Høyland-Kroghsbo N. M., Maerkedahl R. B., Svenningsen S. L. (2013). A quorum-sensing-induced bacteriophage defense mechanism. mBio 4, e00362–312. 10.1128/mBio.00362-12 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Høyland-Kroghsbo N. M., Paczkowski J., Mukherjee S., Broniewski J., Westra E., Bondy-Denomy J., et al. . (2017). Quorum sensing controls the Pseudomonas aeruginosa CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 131–135. 10.1073/pnas.1617415113 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kleanthous H., Smith H. R., Scotland S. M., Gross R. J., Rowe B., Taylor C. M., et al. . (1990). Haemolytic uraemic syndromes in the British Isles, 1985-8: association with verocytotoxin producing Escherichia coli. Part 2: Microbiological aspects. Arch. Dis. Child 65, 722–727. 10.1136/adc.65.7.722 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Krüger A., Lucchesi P. M. (2015). Shiga toxins and stx phages: highly diverse entities. Microbiology 161(Pt 3), 451–462. 10.1099/mic.0.000003 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Labrie S. J., Samson J. E., Moineau S. (2010). Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 317–327. 10.1038/nrmicro2315 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Liu F., Barrangou R., Gerner-Smidt P., Ribot E. M., Knabel S. J., Dudley E. G. (2011). Novel virulence gene and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) multilocus sequence typing scheme for subtyping of the major serovars of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica. Appl Environ. Microbiol. 77, 1946–1956. 10.1128/AEM.02625-10 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Louwen R., Staals R. H., Endtz H. P., van Baarlen P., van der Oost J. (2014). The role of CRISPR-Cas systems in virulence of pathogenic bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78, 74–88. 10.1128/MMBR.00039-13 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Majsec K., Bolt E. L., Ivancic-Bace I. (2016). Cas3 is a limiting factor for CRISPR-Cas immunity in Escherichia coli cells lacking H-NS. BMC Microbiol. 16:28. 10.1186/s12866-016-0643-5 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Medina-Aparicio L., Rebollar-Flores J. E., Gallego-Hernández A. L., Vázquez A., Olvera L., Gutiérrez-Ríos R. M., et al. . (2011). The CRISPR/Cas immune system is an operon regulated by LeuO, H-NS, and leucine-responsive regulatory protein in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. J. Bacteriol. 193, 2396–2407. 10.1128/JB.01480-10 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pacheco A. R., Sperandio V. (2012). Shiga toxin in enterohemorrhagic E. coli: regulation and novel anti-virulence strategies. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2:81. 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00081 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Patterson A. G., Jackson S. A., Taylor C., Evans G. B., Salmond G. P., Przybilski R., et al. . (2016). Quorum Sensing Controls Adaptive Immunity through the Regulation of Multiple CRISPR-Cas Systems. Mol. Cell 64, 1102–1108. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.012 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pul U., Wurm R., Arslan Z., Geissen R., Hofmann N., Wagner R. (2010). Identification and characterization of E. coli CRISPR-cas promoters and their silencing by H-NS. Mol. Microbiol. 75, 1495–1512. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07073.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Schembri M. A., Klemm P. (2001). Biofilm formation in a hydrodynamic environment by novel fimh variants and ramifications for virulence. Infect. Immun. 69, 1322–1328. 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1322-1328.2001 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sheng L., Rasco B., Zhu M. J. (2016). Cinnamon oil inhibits shiga toxin type 2 phage induction and shiga toxin type 2 production in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 6531–6540. 10.1128/AEM.01702-16 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Skyberg J. A., Siek K. E., Doetkott C., Nolan L. K. (2007). Biofilm formation by avian Escherichia coli in relation to media, source and phylogeny. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102, 548–554. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03076.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Smith M. J., Melton-Celsa A. R., Sinclair J. F., Carvalho H. M., Robinson C. M., O'Brien A. D. (2009). Monoclonal antibody 11E10, which neutralizes shiga toxin type 2 (Stx2), recognizes three regions on the Stx2 A subunit, blocks the enzymatic action of the toxin in vitro, and alters the overall cellular distribution of the toxin. Infect. Immun. 77, 2730–2740. 10.1128/IAI.00005-09 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Su L. K., Lu C. P., Wang Y., Cao D. M., Sun J. H., Yan Y. X. (2010). [Lysogenic infection of a Shiga toxin 2-converting bacteriophage changes host gene expression, enhances host acid resistance and motility]. Mol. Biol. (Mosk). 44, 60–73. 10.1134/S0026893310010085 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Toutain C. M., Zegans M. E., O'Toole G. A. (2005). Evidence for two flagellar stators and their role in the motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 187, 771–777. 10.1128/JB.187.2.771-777.2005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • van der Oost J., Jore M. M., Westra E. R., Lundgren M., Brouns S. J. (2009). CRISPR-based adaptive and heritable immunity in prokaryotes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 34, 401–407. 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.05.002 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang S., Niu C., Shi Z., Xia Y., Yaqoob M., Dai J., et al. . (2011). Effects of ibeA deletion on virulence and biofilm formation of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 79, 279–287. 10.1128/IAI.00821-10 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Westra E. R., Buckling A., Fineran P. C. (2014). CRISPR-Cas systems: beyond adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 317–326. 10.1038/nrmicro3241 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Westra E. R., Pul U., Heidrich N., Jore M. M., Lundgren M., Stratmann T., et al. . (2010). H-NS-mediated repression of CRISPR-based immunity in Escherichia coli K12 can be relieved by the transcription activator LeuO. Mol. Microbiol. 77, 1380–1393. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07315.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Westra E. R., van Erp P. B., Künne T., Wong S. P., Staals R. H., Seegers C. L., et al. . (2012). CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3. Mol. Cell 46, 595–605. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.018 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yin S., Jensen M. A., Bai J., Debroy C., Barrangou R., Dudley E. G. (2013). The evolutionary divergence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli is reflected in clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) spacer composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 5710–5720. 10.1128/AEM.00950-13 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zegans M. E., Wagner J. C., Cady K. C., Murphy D. M., Hammond J. H., O'Toole G. A. (2009). Interaction between bacteriophage DMS3 and host CRISPR region inhibits group behaviors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 191, 210–219. 10.1128/JB.00797-08 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA