PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of cjtChinese Journal of Traumatology
 
Chin J Traumatol. 2017 April; 20(2): 87–89.
Published online 2017 February 24. doi:  10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.01.002
PMCID: PMC5392715

Percutaneous planter fasciitis release under local anesthesia: A prospective study

Abstract

Purpose

Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of pain on the bottom of the heel. It occurs when the strong band of the tissue supporting the arch of foot becomes irritated and inflamed. The majority of patients can be treated conservatively but some resistant cases need surgery eventually. This study aims to evaluate the outcome results of percutaneous planter fascia release under local anesthesia for chronic planter fasciitis.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery in the School of Medical Science and Research, Sharda University, India from December 2010 to December 2013. Totally 78 patients with planter fasciitis for more than 6–12 months were recruited from the outpatient department. All patients were operated on under local anesthesia and followed up for a year.

Results

The clinical results were evaluated in terms of pain, activity level and patient satisfaction. Pain relief was achieved averagely at eight weeks after surgery. The results were excellent in 88.46% (69/78) patients and good in 6.41% (9/78) patients. Neither complications of lateral column instability, sinus tarsitis and metatarsalgia nor wound-related complications were encountered. On subjective evaluations, 88.46% (69/78) patients reported full satisfaction and 6.41% (9/78) reported partial satisfaction after treatment.

Conclusion

Percutaneous planter fasciitis release under local anesthesia is a minimally invasive procedure that can be performed in the outpatient setting. It is easy, quick, effective and moreover with few complications.

Keywords: Fasciitis, plantar; Percutaneous release; Anesthesia, local; Minimally invasive surgical procedures

Introduction

Plantar fasciitis is a common condition that causes heel pain in many adults. It occurs when the planter fascia shows myxomatous degeneration, connective tissue calcium deposits, and disorganized collagen fibers. Surgery may be required in 5%–10% of cases of planter fasciitis,1 when a 6–12 months conservative treatment has failed to resolve the tissuer. Plantar fascia release, performed by sectioning a part or the entire fascia via an open or endoscopic procedure, has been the mainstay of treatment.2 However, partial and especially total release of the plantar fascia results in instability of the medial column of the foot, along with lateral column overload and pain.3, 4 Overall, a surgical release has a 70%–90% success rate in treating patients with this condition.5, 6, 7 A study found that endoscopic plantar fascia release provides significantly improved outcomes for patients, especially those with less severe symptoms.8, 9 Potential complications of surgical intervention include flattening of the longitudinal arch and hypoesthesia of the heel. Longitudinal arch strain appears to account for over 50% of the chronic complications.10 An ultrasound-guided technique of percutaneous fasciotomy has been described to be able to treat persistent plantar fasciitis. This technique would potentially allow the performance of a fasciotomy in an office setting.11 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of percutaneous planter fascia release under local anesthesia for planter fasciitis.

Materials and methods

General data

This prospective study was carried out at the Orthopaedics Department of School of Medical Science and Research Hospital, Sharda University in India from December 2010 to December 2013. It has been approved by the institutional medical ethics committee. A written informed consent was obtained from all the patients. A total of 78 patients (13 males and 65 females) with planter fasciitis admitted to the institute were included in this study. The mean age of patients was 45 years (range 30–60 years). Sixty six cases were unilateral planter fasciitis and 12 were bilateral; 56 cases were found on the right side and 34 on the left side. All patients were followed up for a year. The indications for surgery were as follows: more than 6 months of persistent symptoms despite the aggressive conservative treatments, such as rest, drug therapy, splinting, physiotherapy & a history of more than 3 steroid injections for treatment, and functional impairment at work or home. Cases were excluded if the patient had experienced previous surgeries or other foot deformities such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, etc.

Percutaneous technique

The procedure was performed by using local anesthesia administered to the posterior tibial nerve or local infiltration. Then the surgeon marked the medial and lateral margins of the central band of the planter fascia beforehand, because landmarks can be blurred after the injection. A 1 cm-long incision was placed over the prominent fascial band, just distal to the fat pad of the heel. Incision placed too proximally will make identification of the fascia difficult. Distal incision has little fatty tissue under the skin, so identification is easy. Unfortunately, symptomatic heavy scarring of the subcutaneous tissue may happen. Therefore, the incision was placed in the distal aspect of the heel, where fatty tissue remains, but not the full thickness. The incision was deepened with sharp dissection until the planter fascia was reached. This was done blindly because no vital structures were present in this area. It was not difficult to feel the fascia when it was encountered. Spreading tissues with a hemostat or scissors should be avoided, in order to prevent injury to the fat pad and to minimize postoperative scarring.

Once the fascia has been reached, a self-retaining retractor was inserted. If a tourniquet was not used, retractor tension will essentially stop all active bleeding. The fascial margins were then isolated with retractors. With the patient's toes held in extension, the medial fascial band was severed. The area was then palpated, and any deep or stray fibers were cut. The wound was closed with a single deep horizontal mattress retention suture of 4-0 nonabsorbable material (prolene) and the wound margins were re-approximated with simple sutures of 4-0 prolene. A small gauze bandage was applied.

The patient was allowed to begin ambulation the next day. The dressings were changed on day 3 and suture removed on day 10, after which an athletic shoe can be worn as tolerated. The clinical results were evaluated in terms of pain, activity level and patient satisfaction. The follow-up data were obtained from the patients' charts and a questionnaire, and classified according to Grundberg and Dobson.12 (Table 1).

Table 1
Rating system used to evaluate the results.

Results

All patients were followed up for a year. Pain relief was achieved on average eight weeks after surgery. During the last examination, pain, activity and patient satisfaction were evaluated (Table 1).12 The results were excellent in 88.46% (69/78) patients and good in 6.41% (9/78) patients. We did not see any complication of lateral column instability, sinus tarsitis or metatarsalgia. No wound-related complications were encountered. On subjective evaluations, 69 of the 78 patients were satisfied with the results of treatment. All the patients had a full range of ankle motion at the last follow-up examination and returned to their former occupations or activities. All of them were satisfied with the incision scar.

Discussion

A plantar fasciotomy is the most common surgical procedure for plantar fasciitis but there are different techniques that can be employed.13 These techniques include open, endoscopic, minimal incision, and in-step plantar fasciotomy. All of these procedures have been shown to have good postoperative results with satisfied patients.14 Regardless of which procedure the surgeon prefers, the proper amount of plantar fascia incised is one of the keys to a successful outcome and can avoid possible complications.

Saxena et al13 originally advocated complete resection of the plantar fascia; however, two years later they recommended that only the medial 2/3 of the plantar fascia be released.15 With continued experience and evaluation of postoperative complications, their final recommendation is releasing only the medial 1/3 of the plantar fascia. In my view, the medial and a portion of central band of the plantar fascia should be released percutaneously with care to leave the lateral band or at least 25% of the total ligament intact. I consider that another comparison study would be beneficial to evaluate the outcome of percutaneous plantar fasciotomy with less than a 50% release of the plantar fascia. The extent of plantar fascia resected is an important contributing factor to the rate of complications and should be considered for any plantar fascial release surgery. The pain in the lateral column appears to be more consistent with complete fascial releases, which was avoided in this percutaneous procedure.

In addition, the placement of the incision is an important factor. Distal incisions through the fat pad tend to have more complications associated with nerve entrapments. I prefer a percutaneous approach that allows a shorter recovery time, and we encourage early postoperative mobilization therapy. The reason for the change in the amount of plantar fascia to be cut is to reduce the common complication of lateral column destabilization. When the lateral fibers of the plantar fascia are left intact, it is felt that the locking mechanism for the calcaneocuboid joint will not be disrupted. Morsy and Elsheikh15 recommend partial release of less than 40% of the fascia to minimize the effect of arch stability and maintain normal foot biomechanics. Cutts et al16 found that lateral column symptoms were more likely to present when more than 50% of the plantar fascia was released. In this study, we did not see any complications of lateral column instability, sinus tarsitis or metatarsalgia. No wound-related complications were encountered.

DiGiovanni et al17 stated that after 10 months of conservative management, 62 (74%) respondents chose surgery or extracorporeal shock wave therapy as their next step in management. De Jonge et al18 stated that management of planter fasciitis can be quite expensive and often is not covered by insurances. Although no published studies are available in peer-reviewed journals supporting the use of platelet-rich plasma in plantar fasciitis, one placebo-controlled study showed that it had no significant effect in patients with Achilles tendinopathy.

The limitation of this study was that the analysis was not made based on a comparison with other methods of anesthesia and surgical techniques, in which the incision would be mostly heavier than the present method.19 In our study the results were excellent in 88.46% patients and good in 6.41% patients.

In conclusion, percutaneous planter fasciitis release is a relatively simple outpatient procedure for the treatment of long standing cases. The results of this study compare favorably with other more invasive studies, even with an 88.46% satisfaction rate. Nevertheless, the nonoperative course should be maintained as first line therapy for at least six months before consideration of surgical intervention.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University.

References

1. Melvin T.J., Tankersley Z.J., Qazi Z.N. Primary care management of plantar fasciitis. W V Med J. 2015;111:28–32. [PubMed]
2. Gohiya A., Choudhari P., Sharma P. Plantar fasciitis treatment. Orthop J MP Chapter. 2016;22 http://ojmpc.com/index.php/OJMPC/article/view/2/11
3. Radwan Y.A., Mansour A.M., Badawy W.S. Resistant plantar fasciopathy: shock wave versus endoscopic plantar fascial release. Int Orthop. 2012;36:2147–2156. [PubMed]
4. Anderson J.G., Bohay D.R., Eller E.B. Gastrocnemius recession. Foot Ankle Clin. 2014;19:767–786. [PubMed]
5. Tay K.S., Ng Y.C., Singh I.R. Open technique is more effective than percutaneous technique for TOPAZ radiofrequency coblation for plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;18:287–292. [PubMed]
6. Landsman A.S., Catanese D.J., Wiener S.N. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study with crossover to determine the efficacy of radio-frequency nerve ablation for the treatment of heel pain. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013;103:8–15. [PubMed]
7. Wei M., Liu Y., Li Z. Radio frequency overmatches extracorporeal shock wave treatment for patients with intractable plantar fasciitis under local anesthesia. Biomedica. 2015;31:7–10.
8. Klein S.E., Dale A.M., Hayes M.H. Clinical presentation and self-reported patterns of pain and function in patients with plantar heel pain. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:693–698. [PubMed]
9. Li S., Shen T., Liang Y. Miniscalpel-needle versus steroid injection for plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2014;2014 164714. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Khan B., Bashir M.S., Noor R. Effectiveness of plantar fasciitis taping and calcaneal taping in plantar heel pain. JRCRS. 2015;3:99–103.
11. Finnoff J.T., Fowler S.P., Lai J.K. Treatment of chronic tendinopathy with ultrasound-guided needle tenotomy and platelet-rich plasma injection. PM R. 2011;3:900–911. [PubMed]
12. Grundberg A.B., Dobson J.F. Percutaneous release of the common extensor origin for tennis elbow. Clin Orthop. 2000;376:137–140. [PubMed]
13. Saxena A., Fournier M., Gerdesmeyer L. Comparison between extracorporeal shockwave therapy, placebo ESWT and endoscopic plantar fasciotomy for the treatment of chronic plantar heel pain in the athlete. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;2:312–316. [PubMed]
14. Hormozi J., Lee S., Hong D.K. Minimal invasive percutaneous bipolar radiofrequency for plantar fasciotomy: a retrospective study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50:283–286. [PubMed]
15. Morsy M., Elsheikh M. Endoscopic release of resistant plantar fasciitis. Egypt Orthop J. 2014;49:250.
16. Cutts S., Obi N., Pasapula C. Plantar fasciitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94:539–542. [PubMed]
17. DiGiovanni B.F., Moore A.M., Zlotnicki J.P. Preferred management of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis among orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:507–512. [PubMed]
18. de Jonge S., de Vos R.J., Weir A. One-year follow-up of platelet-rich plasma treatment in chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1623–1629. [PubMed]
19. Sahu R.L., Gupta P. Experience of percutaneous trigger finger release under local anesthesia in the medical college of Mullana, Ambala, Haryana. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4:806–809. [PubMed]

Articles from Chinese Journal of Traumatology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier