The goal of this study was to determine whether all of the T3SS-1 effectors previously implicated in eliciting fluid accumulation and inflammation in the calf model of enterocolitis (
41) are also required for invasion of epithelial cells in vitro. Previous studies that relied heavily on an analysis of bacterial invasion of nonpolarized cell lines by strains lacking individual effectors faced limitations due to genetic redundancy in bacterial invasion mechanisms and the absence of a brush border on host cells. In this study we used an alternate approach of complementing a strain lacking all of the effector genes required to elicit fluid accumulation and inflammation in the calf (a
sipA sopABDE2 mutant) by introducing individual effector genes cloned on a low-copy-number plasmid (pWSK29).
Mutational analysis has shown that wild-type
S. enterica serotype Typhimurium is 2 times more invasive for nonpolarized human colon carcinoma (Int-407) cells (
42) and 10 times more invasive for hamster (CHO) cells and human larynx carcinoma (HeLa) cells (
19) than a
sopB mutant is. Consistent with these reports, we show that introduction of the cloned
sopB gene into the
sipA sopABDE2 mutant increased its invasiveness for nonpolarized human colon carcinoma (HT-29) cells fourfold (Fig. ). Wild-type
S. enterica serotype Typhimurium has been shown to be 1.2 times more invasive for nonpolarized simian kidney fibroblast (COS7) cells (
28) and fourfold more invasive for HeLa cells (
1) than a
sopE2 mutant is. Our data demonstrate that introduction of the cloned
sopE2 gene into the
sipA sopABDE2 mutant increased its invasiveness 50-fold for HT-29 cells (Fig. ) and 10-fold for T84 cells (Fig. ). Wild-type
S. enterica serotype Typhimurium has been shown to be as invasive as a
sipA mutant for canine kidney (MDCK) cells when bacteria are recovered 15 min after infection or at subsequent time points (
21). In contrast, we show that introduction of the cloned
sipA gene into the
sipA sopABDE2 mutant increased its invasiveness for HT-29 cells sixfold (Fig. ). Thus, the contribution of
sipA and
sopE2 to the invasion of nonpolarized cells could be demonstrated more clearly by complementation of a
sipA sopABDE2 mutant than by previous characterization of strains in which one gene was inactivated.
Studying invasion of tissue was complicated by the fact that differences in the invasiveness of the strains tested were small and difficult to demonstrate given the relatively large variation observed during animals experiments. Thus, the bovine ligated ileal loop model and the bovine tissue explant model are less well suited for analyzing bacterial invasion than tissue culture models are. However, analysis of S. enterica serotype Typhimurium interaction with the bovine mucosa can provide insights into aspects of host-pathogen interaction that appear not to be modeled in tissue culture. For example, we did not observe loss of TER in infected tissue explants while polarized T84 monolayers rapidly lost their TER during invasion.
Our data provide evidence for a synergistic action between SopB and SipA during the invasion of HT-29 and T84 cells (Fig. ). A synergistic action of T3SS-1 effectors during host cell invasion has previously been reported for SopB, SopE, and SopE2 (
26,
42). Wild-type
S. enterica serotype Typhimurium was shown to be 100-fold more invasive for nonpolarized COS7 cells than a
sopB sopE sopE2 mutant and 600-fold more invasive than a strain carrying a defective form of T3SS-1 (
invG mutant) (
26). These and similar results obtained with Int-407 cells led to the conclusion that SopB, SopE, and SopE2 are the only effectors required for invasion of epithelial cells (
26,
42). Although this conclusion may be correct for nonpolarized COS7 and Int-407 cells, our data show that different combinations of effectors contributed to the invasion of nonpolarized T84 and HT-29 cells (Table ). While SopB, SipA, and SopE2 enhanced the invasiveness of the
sipA sopABDE2 mutant for nonpolarized HT-29 cells (Fig. ), only introduction of the cloned
sopE2 gene significantly enhanced the invasiveness of the
sipA sopABDE2 mutant for nonpolarized T84 cells (Fig. ). Thus, caution should be taken in generalizing results obtained with individual nonpolarized cell lines.
| TABLE 3.Contribution of T3SS-1 effectors to invasion of different cell lines |
Perhaps the most significant result of this study is that the contribution of some T3SS-1 effectors to invasion was only apparent when polarized epithelial cells were used. This finding is highly relevant because polarized human colon carcinoma cells are thought to resemble epithelial cells encountered by
S. enterica serotype Typhimurium in the intestinal mucosa more closely than other cell culture models do. Comparison of the general pattern of invasion observed in bovine ligated ileal loops with that observed in polarized T84 cells supported this view (Fig. ). Polarization of cells has previously been shown to affect host cell signaling pathways activated by
S. enterica serotype Typhimurium during bacterial entry. While
S. enterica serotype Typhimurium activates the GTPases Rac1 and CDC42 when entering nonpolarized MDCK cells, only Rac1 is activated when the bacterium invades the apical membrane of polarized MDCK cells (
4). A likely explanation for this observation is that SopE, a nucleotide exchange factor for Rac1 (
16), acts locally at sites underlying bacterial contact and that Rac1 is more abundant in apical membrane compartments than CDC42 is (
4).
Importantly, previous studies with nonpolarized cells did not provide evidence for a contribution of SopA and SopD to bacterial invasion (
26,
36). In contrast, our data show that the
sopD and
sopA genes contributed to the invasion of polarized but not nonpolarized T84 cells (Fig. ). This is the first report implicating these effectors in bacterial entry into mammalian cells and suggests that at least six T3SS-1 effectors, including SipA, SopA, SopB, SopD, SopE, and SopE2, are involved in epithelial invasion (Table ). It could be speculated that SopA and SopD may only be required during invasion of the brush border of an epithelial cell. However, it is difficult to study the underlying mechanisms because the cellular targets of SopA and SopD have not been identified.