Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 10.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC5386400

Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Weight Loss and CVD Risk Management

Carl Fulwiler, MD, PhD,1 Judson A. Brewer, MD, PhD,2 Sinead Sinnott, BA,3 and Eric B. Loucks, PhD4


Obesity affects more than one-third of U.S. adults and is a major cause of preventable morbidity and mortality, primarily from cardiovascular disease. Traditional behavioral interventions for weight loss typically focus on diet and exercise habits and often give little attention to the role of stress and emotions in the initiation and maintenance of unhealthy behaviors, which may account for their modest results and considerable variability in outcomes. Stress eating and emotional eating are increasingly recognized as important targets of weight loss interventions. Mindfulness-based interventions were specifically developed to promote greater self-efficacy in coping with stress and negative emotions, and appear to be effective for a variety of conditions. In recent years researchers have begun to study mindfulness interventions for weight loss and CVD risk management. This review describes the rationale for the use of mindfulness in interventions for weight loss and CVD risk management, summarizes the research to date, and suggests priorities for future research.

Keywords: obesity, cardiovascular disease, weight loss, stress eating, mindfulness, CVD risk management, interventions


Obesity is a major cause of preventable mortality, with the WHO estimating that they cause 2.9 million deaths annually worldwide. Obesity is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease [1, 2] and also increases the incidence of other risk factors like hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes. With more than two-thirds (68.5%) of U.S. adults considered overweight or obese [3], effective approaches to weight loss and prevention of weight gain are imperative. Intentional weight loss is associated with reduced CVD risk factors (e.g. hypertension, diabetes), cardiac events and mortality [4, 5].

Despite growing awareness of the importance of weight loss, current efforts to achieve sustained long-term weight loss have not been particularly successful. Lifestyle interventions that rely on education and cognitive-behavioral strategies to facilitate change in diet and physical activity are the mainstay of treatment but produce modest results; the majority of lost weight is regained[6]; [7];[8] ; [9]. Moreover, there is marked variability in outcomes, with some participants losing 10% of body weight and others losing much less, or even gaining weight. Success rates of bariatric surgery for obesity are higher, but surgery is not a practical or cost-effective solution to the epidemic of overweight and obesity [10].

One reason for the disappointing results of lifestyle interventions may be their failure to adequately address the effects of stress and emotions on the initiation and maintenance of unhealthy behaviors that contribute to energy imbalance. A growing body of evidence implicates stress in disordered eating and obesity [1113], while epidemiological [1417] and longitudinal studies have linked stress and weight gain [18]. Although the effects of acute stress on food intake are variable (on average about 40% increase intake, 40% decrease intake, and 20% show no change [11], emotional eaters and obese individuals consistently increase intake in response to stress and negative emotion and tend to gain weight as a result [19], [20] [13]. Moreover, acute stress and negative emotions consistently affect food preference in both animals and humans, causing an increased preference for highly palatable foods, which are calorie-dense and high in fat, sugar and/or salt[11, 12]. These “comfort foods” are increasingly available in our obesogenic environment and are increasingly used to cope with stress and regulate mood.

The consumption of comfort foods, as the name implies, provides temporary relief from negative emotional states likely because of their effects on the brain’s reward system: individuals learn that eating these types of food makes them temporarily feel better [12]. This negative reinforcement contributes to emotional learning -stress and negative emotion become associated with the rewarding effects of eating comfort foods, and with repetition this response becomes habitual. Repeated consumption of highly palatable food increases sensitivity of reward pathways, influencing food preference and intake. Overlap between reward and emotion circuits contributes to emotional and reward-based eating and to lasting changes in appetite and craving for these foods [12]. Emotional eating, defined eating in response to emotional distress, is a better predictor of weight gain and regain than other eating behaviors and lifestyle factors [21] and also predicts weight loss and maintenance in clinical trials[22]; [23]; [24]. Stress eating and emotional eating are related; stress, perceived as overwhelming one’s ability to cope has been shown to trigger negative emotions and emotional eating of highly palatable food [25, 26]. Evidence suggests that both stress eating and emotional eating increase risk for weight gain, and eventual obesity,[11, 27];[28]. Standard behavioral weight loss programs often include only two to three sessions on cognitive-behavioral strategies to address overeating in response to psychological factors. These strategies can be difficult to sustain over time for most people, and may be particularly vulnerable to periods of emotional challenge and increased stress which is associated with diminished cognitive processing ability[29].

The objectives of this article are to: 1) describe the rationale of why MBIs may be effective for weight loss and other cardiovascular risk factors; 2) discuss strategies for applying mindfulness to behavioral interventions for these conditions; 3) examine the state of the evidence for these interventions; and 4) suggest priorities for future directions. Note that there is evidence that MBIs may be effective for some obesity-related eating behaviors, specifically binge eating, emotional eating and external eating, but studies that did not include weight as an outcome are beyond the scope of this review (see [30] for a recent review).

Origins and Rationale for Mindfulness-Based Interventions

Mindfulness has been defined as “the awareness that emerges through paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgmentally to the unfolding of experience moment by moment”[31]. Mindfulness meditation is a form of mental training that involves observation of the constantly changing patterns of internal and external experience moment to moment. Mindfulness training (MT) emphasizes cultivation of nonreactive, nonjudgmental awareness which promotes reduced reactivity to aversive experience[32] ; [33]. Emerging evidence suggests that MT reduces subjective, self-referential appraisal (“it’s about me”[34]) and is believed to exert its effects through several components, including attention regulation, viscerosomatic awareness, emotion regulation, and self-perception, which together enhance self-regulation (see [35] for review, and [36] for a recent review of our current understanding of the neural mechanisms mediating these effects). In contrast to cognitive strategies that rely on “top-down” neural processes to alter cognitive elaboration (e.g. reappraisal), mindfulness limits cognitive elaboration and supports more sensory-based representations, acceptance of negative thoughts and emotions. These support a more objective perspective, reducing the perceived threat to self (“it’s not about me”).

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) were first introduced to Western medical settings in 1979 by Jon Kabat-Zinn who developed Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) [37]. MBSR is a multicomponent intervention that provides systematic training in formal mindfulness meditation practices as well as the informal application of mindfulness in daily life. It also includes gentle stretching and mindful yoga and psychoeducation about the effects of stress on health and the applications of mindfulness to support improved health and health-enhancing behaviors. Subsequent adaptations of MBSR have been developed for a variety of conditions such as preventing relapse of recurrent depression [38] and addiction [39]. MBIs have in common the formal teaching of mindfulness meditation practices, explicit encouragement to develop a daily practice, and the requirement that teachers have extensive formal training in mindfulness and their own daily practice. Mindfulness is also a core ingredient of other interventions such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) [40], without the emphasis on formal meditation practice.

A growing body of evidence supports the efficacy of MBIs for a variety of populations and conditions. Recent meta-analyses have found small to moderate effect sizes for promoting psychological well-being and reducing stress [41] [42], and for relieving symptoms of anxiety, depression and chronic pain in clinical populations with both mental health and physical disorders [43, 44]. The largest meta-analysis of all research on meditation practices, commissioned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, recently concluded that based on current evidence that mindfulness is effective for symptoms of anxiety, depression and chronic pain and that physicians should be prepared to talk to their patients about the role that mindfulness meditation programs could have in addressing psychological distress[43]. The clinical changes produced by mindfulness are associated with lasting changes in brain structure and function subserving attentional processes, emotion regulation, and self-processing [35, 36].


The rationale for applying mindfulness to weight loss interventions derives from the intention of MT to cultivate a nonreactive and nonjudgmental form of awareness in the face of stressors and unpleasant thoughts, emotions and sensations. Less reactivity and greater self-efficacy may in turn reduce impulsive eating and food craving and facilitate unlearning of unhealthy behaviors previously used to cope with stress and negative emotions. In addition, from the outset the MBSR program emphasized self-care and a healthy lifestyle and incorporates instruction for mindful eating and healthy nutrition, physical activity, and adequate sleep. Based on the evidence that MBI’s are effective for reducing relapse of recurrent depression [45] and substance abuse [46], continued practice may also support maintenance of weight loss by reducing sensitivity to stressors and negative emotions which otherwise may trigger relapse to unhealthy behaviors.

A limited number of studies have examined whether the original MBSR program promotes weight loss. To date, MBSR alone has not been found to lead to weight loss, but adequately-powered randomized controlled trials of populations seeking to lose weight have yet to be done (see [47] for review). Mindfulness-Based Eating Awareness Training, or MB-EAT [48] is an adaptation of MBSR that applies mindfulness meditation practices to eating and awareness of eating-related physical cues, such as hunger and satiety cues, thoughts and emotions. It was designed to treat binge eating and does not focus on weight loss. The largest RCT of MB-EAT demonstrated a significant reduction in binge eating and weight, but results were not significantly different compared to a psychoeducational/cognitive-behavioral treatment known to be effective for binge eating[49]. This study did not report on whether results differed for obese participants. One RCT on stress eating in 47 overweight and obese women examined a novel mindfulness intervention based on components of MBSR, MB-EAT and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) for stress eating [50]. Although not designed to produce weight loss, the investigators measured change in weight and abdominal adiposity in participants assigned to the intervention and a waitlist control group. No significant changes in weight or adiposity were observed in either group, but in an exploratory intent-to-treat analysis by obesity status, obese subjects in the treatment group maintained weight (−0.4 ± 3.5 kg, P = .70) while those in the control group gained weight (1.7 ± 1.5 kg, P = .01). Another intervention that modified MBCT to include training in mindful eating and body awareness found a significant reduction in both emotional and external eating relative to a control group but no significant weight loss [51]. Thus, based on current evidence, MBI’s without diet and/or exercise components tend not to be to be effective for weight loss. However, the focus of these studies has been primarily on the emotional determinants of eating and psychological distress rather than promoting weight loss, with only brief follow-up (3–4 months at most). The standard MBI approach may yet prove effective in the long-term as it promotes increasing awareness and long-term changes in automatic and habitual patterns. The vast majority of overweight and obese individuals have lost significant amounts of weight repeatedly, only to regain it after 1–2 years. It is possible that the effect of MBI’S on weight would be gradual so longer follow-up is needed.

There is a larger literature on weight loss interventions that combine mindfulness training with a focus on mindful eating with elements of traditional weight management programs such as educational and/or behavioral skills training for improving diet and physical activity[5254]. For example, an adaptation of MB-EAT that included medical nutrition therapy was developed for individuals with diabetes. In this RCT, overweight or obese Type 2 individuals with diabetes (n=52) were randomized to the 12-week mindfulness intervention or a diabetes group self-management education program [55]. Both interventions resulted in significant weight loss at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up (1.8 kg ± 0.5 and 1.5 ± 0.5 (both p<.01) respectively for MB-EAT-D and 3.2 ± 6 and 2.9 ± 5 respectively for the control intervention). Weight loss was not significantly different between the two interventions, consistent with findings from the largest MB-EAT trial to date [49]. Another study focused specifically on mindful restaurant eating for individuals who eat out frequently to address the excess calories typically consumed at restaurants[54]. Mindful eating skills were taught in 6 weekly group sessions and included nutritional education and cognitive-behavioral components in addition to mindfulness skills training. Although the intention of the intervention was prevention of weight gain and the majority of participants were not dieting with the intent to lose weight at the start of the study, on average the intervention group lost 1.7 kg at 6 weeks follow-up (p=.03).

Another application of mindfulness to weight loss interventions is the teaching of mindfulness skills for responding to specific external conditions or internal states. These interventions might best be characterized as mindfulness skills training rather than mindfulness-based because they do not involve training in formal meditation practices or the expectation to develop a daily meditation practice. To date most studies of this strategy for weight loss have been based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and other acceptance-based therapies shown to be effective for a variety of mental health conditions, with additional educational and behavioral skills components targeting eating and/or weight management (see [56] for a discussion of the rationale for teaching acceptance and mindfulness for weight management). Acceptance-based therapies aim to reduce avoidance behavior, increase psychological flexibility, and facilitate commitment to change. Although promising, the methodological shortcomings of most studies of acceptance-based treatments for weight loss limit the strength of conclusions about their efficacy. One exception is a recently published randomized controlled trial of 128 overweight and obese men and women who were randomized to an acceptance-based weight loss intervention or a standard behavioral program [57]. Treatment was group-based, consisting of 30 sessions over 40 weeks. Both groups demonstrated significant weight loss with the experimental group losing significantly more weight post-treatment (13.17% v. 7.54%) and 6-month follow-up (10.98% v. 4.82%). The acceptance-based treatment was particularly effective for participants with more depressive symptoms at baseline..

The long-term effects of mindfulness on weight loss are unknown. Research to date has only reported outcomes post-intervention or relatively short follow-up (3–4 months) and no study has yet been published on maintenance of weight loss.


To date, there is virtually no evidence on whether mindfulness is related to cardiovascular events. However, there is preliminary evidence that mindfulness is related to cardiovascular health [58] and that MBIs may impacts CVD risk factors, reviewed below.


There has been early exploration of MBIs on smoking cessation, using randomized controlled trials [59]. For example, in an intent-to-treat analysis, Brewer et al. found that participants enrolled in MT for smoking cessation vs. American Lung Association’s Freedom From Smoking had significantly higher 4-month abstinence rates, demonstrating 31% vs. 5% abstinence, respectively [60]. In this study, mindfulness practice was found to moderate the decoupling of the link between craving and smoking [61]. A recent study on a different intervention named “Mindfulness Training for Smokers” showed significant differences between treatment vs. control groups in a disadvantaged population, but no difference in a more generalizable population [62]. Finally, there have been a number of recent reports suggesting that app- and web-based delivery of mindfulness interventions have promise in smoking cessation [6365]. Studies are moving forward in identifying active components of the mindfulness interventions, and subgroups of people for whom the interventions may be most effective. Additional work, including replication studies, with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is needed to evaluate intervention effectiveness.

Blood Pressure

A 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis of four MBIs randomized controlled trials showed significant but heterogeneous effects on blood pressure [66]. Rigor of methods for several of the studies was limited, often including fairly high loss-to-follow-up and brief follow-periods, with the exception of a study that used one year follow-up period [67]. There is some evidence of floor effects, where the greatest blood pressure effects were seen in the study that included participants with the highest baseline blood pressure (unmedicated stage 1 or 2 hypertension) [68], compared to other studies that included participants with unmedicated stage I hypertension [67], prehypertension [69], or did not have blood pressure level inclusion criteria [70]. Methodologically rigorous, randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up will provide important information about whether MBIs have an impact on blood pressure, and if so, for whom.

Diabetes and Glucose Regulation

Five randomized controlled trials have investigated contributions of mindfulness interventions on glucose regulation in patients with diabetes. Of these, two showed significant improvements in glucose regulation measures (i.e. HbA1C, fasting glucose) [71, 72], and three demonstrated no effect [70, 73, 74]. Both of the interventions that significantly improved glucose regulation trained participants in mindfulness in addition to health behaviors that improve glucose regulation, including diet, physical activity, glucose monitoring, and use of diabetes medication [71, 72]. Studies not influencing glucose regulation tested standardized mindfulness-based interventions, specifically Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction [70] and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy [73, 74], described in more detail above. Thus, mindfulness interventions that are customized towards improving mindfulness skills for glucose regulation may yield greater effects on diabetes management. To our knowledge, there have been no studies of MBIs targeting prevention of diabetes in at-risk populations. Overall, evidence suggests that mindfulness practices may help with glucose regulation, but additional research is needed to determine if standard vs. customized mindfulness interventions are more effective at lowering diabetes risk.

Physical Activity

To date the interventions for physical activity that have included mindfulness have been based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy [7578]. Three of the four randomized controlled trials showed significant effects on physical activity outcomes including self-report physical activity (Brief Physical Assessment Tool assessing number of physical activity bouts per week [79], International Physical Activity Questionnaire [76]) and directly assessed physical activity (pedometer-assessed step count [76] and exercise tolerance time defined as duration of loaded pedaling [77]). The study showing null findings used self-report and accelerometer-based measures of physical activity [78]. It should be noted that the latter study found significant improvements in accelerometer-assessed physical activity for both the intervention (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy + physical activity feedback) and active control (feedback only), and significant improvements in physical activity for intervention vs. control in post-hoc analyses of the non-depressive sample [78]. Follow-up time of studies had a wide range, and were approximately 1 hour [77], 12 weeks [76], and 6 months [78, 79].


A recent review by our group described mechanisms and a theoretical framework by which mindfulness interventions could influence CVD risk [80]. Mechanisms with evidence to date include three main areas, specifically: (1) attention control, (2) emotional regulation, and (3) self-awareness. We refer readers to this review for further information on plausible mechanisms and a theoretical framework of how mindfulness interventions could influence obesity and CVD risk management.


Given the promising but inconclusive evidence that MBIs may be effective for promoting weight loss and reducing cardiovascular risk, the field is now ready for fully-powered randomized controlled interventions employing appropriate comparison conditions and follow-up periods of 1–2 years. There is insufficient evidence to date that mindfulness interventions are superior to other evidence-based approaches for weight loss or CVD risk.

Additionally, before conclusions can be made about the need for customized programs to address weight loss and CVD risk factors, well-designed, fully-powered studies of MBSR with long-term follow-up are needed. MBSR has been disseminated worldwide is available in over 500 sites in the U.S., and has formalized training and certification processes in place. Given these, it could be a cost-effective approach that is more easily generalized. The standard MBI approach may yet prove effective with adequate follow-up. For example, in a RCT of MBSR vs. a well-matched education control for patients with asthma, both groups improved on measures of asthma-related quality of life and perceived stress at 6 months with no significant between-group differences, but by 12 months participants in the control group had returned to baseline while the MBSR group maintained their gains and the difference on both measures was significantly different between groups. [81]. Similarly, in a RCT of MBSR in people with Type 2 diabetes, there were no significant differences post-intervention compared to treatment as usual, but at 1-year follow-up the MBSR group showed significant lower diastolic blood pressure and depression scores, and improved health status [70] Thus, comparative effectiveness studies will be needed and it will be important to examine predictors of response in order to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from mindfulness interventions.

Future studies should also include data on adherence to establish the impact of dose on outcomes, and on the meditation training and practice of teachers as this has been shown to affect outcomes [44]. One challenge to this and other fields of mindfulness research will be understanding the mechanisms underlying positive outcomes given the limitations of the tools currently available for measuring mindfulness, and the importance of elucidating mechanisms for producing maximally effective and implementable interventions in actual practice [82]. Until reliable biological or behavioral measures are available, it may prove more useful to examine the dose-response relationship using measures of mindfulness practice, although this approach has its own limitations as it relies on self-report.

It is critically important that future studies include more diverse populations given that obesity rates are higher among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups [83, 84] and existing weight loss interventions may be less effective in these groups [85, 86]. Future studies of MBIs for CVD risk factors will need to examine whether they can be maintained over time to lower cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.


Current evidence supports the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions for improving mental health symptoms and psychological stress that can interfere with efforts to lose weight and improve CVD risk. Patients with obesity and other CVD risk factors may benefit from a mindfulness meditation program to address psychosocial stress, depression and anxiety, which are independent risk factors for CVD[87, 88]. However, evidence to date that MBIs are effective for addressing obesity and CVD risk directly is mixed. The goal of mindfulness practices is lasting changes in long-standing cognitive and emotional habits. The impact of these changes on weight and CVD risk are likely to be gradual and will require longer follow-up periods to demonstrate.


This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (NIH) R34AT006963 to C.F. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or the UMMS Center for Mindfulness.


Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.

Conflict of Interest

Carl Fulwiler, Eric Loucks and Sinead Sinnott have no relevant disclosures to report. Judson Brewer is a stockholder in Claritas Mindsciences.


1. Krauss RM, et al. Obesity : impact on cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 1998;98(14):1472–1476. [PubMed]
2. Poirier P, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology, evaluation, and effect of weight loss: an update of the 1997 American Heart Association Scientific Statement on Obesity and Heart Disease from the Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation. 2006;113(6):898–918. [PubMed]
3. Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(8):806–814. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Pack QR, et al. The Prognostic Importance of Weight Loss in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2014;89(10):1368–1377. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Smith SC, Jr, et al. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation endorsed by the World Heart Federation and the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(23):2432–2446. [PubMed]
6. Anderson JW, et al. Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74(5):579–584. [PubMed]
7. Faucher MA. How to lose weight and keep it off: what does the evidence show? Nurs Womens Health. 2007;11(2):170–179. [PubMed]
8. Franz MJ, et al. Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2007;107:1755–1767. [PubMed]
9. Burke LE, Wang J. Treatment strategies for overweight and obesity. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2011;43(4):368–375. [PubMed]
10. Jensen MD, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S102–S138. [PubMed]
11. Dallman MF. Stress-induced obesity and the emotional nervous system. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21(3):159–165. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Sinha R, Jastreboff AM. Stress as a common risk factor for obesity and addiction. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73(9):827–835. [PubMed] •• This review synthesizes findings from the literature and the authors' own work pointing to common psychological and neurobiological mechanisms underlying the effects of stress on reward-mediated consumption of comfort of highly palatable foods and addictive substances, and suggests future directions for research on how stress increases the risk of obesity.
13. Warne JP. Shaping the stress response: interplay of palatable food choices, glucocorticoids, insulin and abdominal obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;300(1–2):137–146. [PubMed]
14. Block JP, et al. Psychosocial stress and change in weight among US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(2):181–192. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Danese A, Tan M. Childhood maltreatment and obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19(5):544–554. [PubMed]
16. Midei AJ, Matthews KA. Interpersonal violence in childhood as a risk factor for obesity: a systematic review of the literature and proposed pathways. Obes Rev. 2011;12(5):e159–e172. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Tsenkova V, Boylan JM, Ryff C. Stress eating and health. Findings from MIDUS, a national study of US adults. Appetite. 2013;69:151–155. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Wardle J, et al. Stress and adiposity: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011;19(4):771–778. [PubMed]
19. Adam TC, Epel ES. Stress, eating and the reward system. Physiol Behav. 2007;91(4):449–458. [PubMed]
20. Torres SJ, Nowson CA. Relationship between stress, eating behavior, and obesity. Nutrition. 2007;23(11):887–894. [PubMed]
21. Koenders PG, van Strien T. Emotional eating, rather than lifestyle behavior, drives weight gain in a prospective study in 1562 employees. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53:1287–1293. [PubMed]
22. Niemeier HM, et al. Internal disinhibition predicts weight regain following weight loss and weight loss maintenance. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15:2485–2494. [PubMed]
23. Butryn ML, Thomas JG, Lowe MR. Reductions in internal disinhibition during weight loss predict better weight loss maintenance. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17(5):1101–1103. [PubMed]
24. Teixeira PJ, et al. Mediators of weight loss and weight loss maintenance in middle-aged women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010;18(4):725–735. [PubMed]
25. Tomiyama AJ, Dallman MF, Epel ES. Comfort food is comforting to those most stressed: evidence of the chronic stress response network in high stress women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011;36(10):1513–1519. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Tryon MS, et al. Chronic stress exposure may affect the brain's response to high calorie food cues and predispose to obesogenic eating habits. Physiology & behavior. 2013;120:233–242. [PubMed]
27. Gibson EL. The psychobiology of comfort eating: implications for neuropharmacological interventions. Behav Pharmacol. 2012;23(5–6):442–460. [PubMed]
28. Goldschmidt AB, et al. Affect and eating behavior in obese adults with and without elevated depression symptoms. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2014;47(3):281–286. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Arnsten AF. Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(6):410–422. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. O'Reilly GA, et al. Mindfulness-based interventions for obesity-related eating behaviours: a literature review. Obes Rev. 2014;15(6):453–461. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical psychology: Science and practice. 2003;10(2):144–156.
32. Perlman DM, et al. Differential effects on pain intensity and unpleasantness of two meditation practices. Emotion. 2010;10(1):65–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Zeidan F, et al. Mindfulness meditation-related pain relief: evidence for unique brain mechanisms in the regulation of pain. Neurosci Lett. 2012;520(2):165–173. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Brewer JA, et al. Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(50):20254–20259. [PubMed]
35. Holzel BK, et al. How Does Mindfulness Meditation Work? Proposing Mechanisms of Action From a Conceptual and Neural Perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6(6):537–559. [PubMed]
36. Tang YY, Holzel BK, Posner MI. The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2015;16(4):U213–U280. [PubMed] •• A clear and comprehensive review of the literature on the neural correlates and mechanisms of mindfulness meditation including a critique of methodological limitations and recommendations for future research.
37. Kabat-Zinn J. University of Massachusetts Medical Center/Worcester. Full catastrophe living : using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York, N.Y: Delacorte Press; 1990. Stress Reduction Clinic; p. xxi.p. 453.
38. Segal ZV, Williams JMG, Teasdale JD. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression : a new approach to preventing relapse. New York: Guilford Press; 2002. p. xiv.p. 351.
39. Bowen S, et al. Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention for Substance Use Disorders: A Pilot Efficacy Trial. Substance Abuse. 2009;30(4):295–305. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An Experiential Approach to Behavior Change. 1999
41. Grossman P, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits. A meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57(1):35–43. [PubMed]
42. Khoury B, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: A meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78(6):519–528. [PubMed]
43. Goyal M, et al. Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:357–368. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Khoury B, et al. Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(6):763–771. [PubMed]
45. Piet J, Hougaard E. The effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for prevention of relapse in recurrent major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31(6):1032–1040. [PubMed]
46. Bowen S, et al. Relative Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention, Standard Relapse Prevention, and Treatment as Usual for Substance Use Disorders. Jama Psychiatry. 2014;71(5):547–556. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Katterman SN, et al. Mindfulness meditation as an intervention for binge eating, emotional eating, and weight loss: a systematic review. Eat Behav. 2014;15(2):197–204. [PubMed] •• This was the first systematic review to examine interventions that used mindfulness as the primary intervention for subclinical disordered eating or weight loss.
48. Kristeller JL, Wolever RQ. Mindfulness-based eating awareness training for treating binge eating disorder: the conceptual foundation. Eat Disord. 2011;19(1):49–61. [PubMed] • Presents the theoretical underpinnings of mindfulness-based approaches to obesity-related eating behaviors.
49. Kristeller J, Wolever RQ, Sheets V. Mindfulness Based Eating Awareness Training (MB-EAT) for Binge Eating: A randomized clinical trial. Mindfulness. 2013;5:282–297.
50. Daubenmier J, et al. Mindfulness Intervention for Stress Eating to Reduce Cortisol and Abdominal Fat among Overweight and Obese Women: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Study. J Obes. 2011;2011:651936. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Alberts HJ, Thewissen R, Raes L. Dealing with problematic eating behaviour. The effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on eating behaviour, food cravings, dichotomous thinking and body image concern. Appetite. 2012;58:847–851. [PubMed]
52. Dalen J, et al. Pilot study: Mindful Eating and Living (MEAL): weight, eating behavior, and psychological outcomes associated with a mindfulness-based intervention for people with obesity. Complement Ther Med. 2010;18:260–264. [PubMed]
53. Miller CK, et al. Comparative effectiveness of a mindful eating intervention to a diabetes self-management intervention among adults with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(11):1835–1842. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Timmerman GM, Brown A. The effect of a mindful restaurant eating intervention on weight management in women. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012;44:22–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Miller CK, et al. Comparison of a mindful eating intervention to a diabetes self-management intervention among adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education. 2014;41:145–154. [PubMed] • This randomized controlled trial of Type 2 diabetics compared a 12-week MB-EAT intervention adapted for diabetics to include medical nutrition therapy with a diabetes group self-management education program. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in weight loss, caloric consumption and glycemic control at program completion and 3-month follow-up and the authors concluded that both interventions were effective for diabetes self-management.
56. Lillis J, et al. Teaching acceptance and mindfulness to improve the lives of the obese: a preliminary test of a theoretical model. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37(1):58–69. [PubMed]
57. Forman EM, et al. Comparison of acceptance-based and standard cognitive-based coping strategies for craving sweets in overweight and obese women. Eat Behav. 2013;14:64–68. [PubMed]
58. Loucks EB, et al. Positive Associations of Dispositional Mindfulness with Cardiovascular Health: the New England Family Study. Int J Behav Med. 2014 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. de Souza IC, et al. Mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of smoking: a systematic literature review. J Altern Complement Med. 2015;21(3):129–140. [PubMed]
60. Brewer JA, et al. Mindfulness training for smoking cessation: results from a randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;119(1–2):72–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Elwafi HM, et al. Mindfulness training for smoking cessation: Moderation of the relationship between craving and cigarette use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;130(1–3):222–229. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Davis JM, et al. Randomized trial on mindfulness training for smokers targeted to a disadvantaged population. Subst Use Misuse. 2014;49(5):571–585. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Davis JM, et al. Mindfulness training for smokers via web-based video instruction with phone support: a prospective observational study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:95. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Ruscio AC, et al. Effect of Brief Mindfulness Practice on Self-Reported Affect, Craving, and Smoking: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Using Ecological Momentary Assessment. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 [PubMed]
65. Garrison KA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of smartphone-based mindfulness training for smoking cessation: a study protocol. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Abbott RA, et al. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness based cognitive therapy in vascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Psychosom Res. 2014;76(5):341–351. [PubMed] • This systematic review identfiied nine articles (from 8 RCTs) describing results of MBIs for patients with hypertension, diabetes, heart disease and stroke. Meta-analyses conducted on data from 578 patients revealed beneficial effects for stress, depression and anxiety, with less robust findings for physical outcomes.
67. Blom K, et al. Hypertension analysis of stress reduction using mindfulness meditation and yoga: results from the harmony randomized controlled trial. Am J Hypertens. 2014;27(1):122–129. [PubMed]
68. de la Fuente M, Franco C, Salvador M. Reduction of blood pressure in a group of hypertensive teadhers through a program of mindfulness meditation. Psicol Conductual. 2010;18:533–552.
69. Hughes JW, et al. Randomized controlled trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for prehypertension. Psychosom Med. 2013;75:721–728. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Hartmann M, et al. Sustained effects of a mindfulness-based stress-reduction intervention in type 2 diabetic patients: design and first results of a randomized controlled trial (the Heidelberger Diabetes and Stress-study) Diabetes Care. 2012;35(5):945–947. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Gregg JA, et al. Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75(2):336–343. [PubMed]
72. Youngwanichsetha S, Phumdoung S, Ingkathawornwong T. The effects of mindfulness eating and yoga exercise on blood sugar levels of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Appl Nurs Res. 2014;27(4):227–230. [PubMed]
73. van Son J, et al. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for people with diabetes and emotional problems: long-term follow-up findings from the DiaMind randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2014;77(1):81–84. [PubMed]
74. Tovote KA, et al. Long-term effects of individual mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and cognitive behavior therapy for depressive symptoms in patients with diabetes: a randomized trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):186–187. [PubMed]
75. Tapper K, et al. Exploratory randomised controlled trial of a mindfulness-based weight loss intervention for women. Appetite. 2009;52(2):396–404. [PubMed]
76. Moffitt R, Mohr P. The efficacy of a self-managed Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention DVD for physical activity initiation. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20(1):115–129. [PubMed]
77. Ivanova E, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy improves exercise tolerance in sedentary women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(6):1251–1258. [PubMed]
78. Kangasniemi AM, et al. Towards a physically more active lifestyle based on one's own values: the results of a randomized controlled trial among physically inactive adults. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:260. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
79. Tapper K, et al. Exploratory randomised controlled trial of a mindfulness-based weight loss intervention for women. Appetite. 2009;52:396–404. [PubMed]
80. Loucks E, et al. Mindfulness and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: State of the Evidence, Plausible Mechanisms, and Theoretical Framework. Current Cardiology Reports. (under review) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
81. Pbert L, et al. Effect of mindfulness training on asthma quality of life and lung function: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2012;67(9):769–776. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
82. Onken LS, et al. Reenvisioning Clinical Science: Unifying the Discipline to Improve the Public Health. Clin Psychol Sci. 2014;2(1):22–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. Ball K, Crawford D. Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: a review. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(9):1987–2010. [PubMed]
84. Powell-Wiley TM, et al. Change in Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Weight Gain: Dallas Heart Study. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(1):72–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
85. Davis EM, et al. Racial and socioeconomic differences in the weight-loss experiences of obese women. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(9):1539–1543. [PubMed]
86. Hartmann-Boyce J, et al. Self-help for weight loss in overweight and obese adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(3):e43–e57. [PubMed]
87. Richardson S, et al. Meta-analysis of perceived stress and its association with incident coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(12):1711–1716. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
88. Rosengren A, et al. Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and 13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):953–962. [PubMed]