PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of microarrLink to Publisher's site
 
Microarrays (Basel). 2017 March; 6(1): 6.
Published online 2017 March 4. doi:  10.3390/microarrays6010006
PMCID: PMC5374366

Use of a Pan–Genomic DNA Microarray in Determination of the Phylogenetic Relatedness among Cronobacter spp. and Its Use as a Data Mining Tool to Understand Cronobacter Biology

Massimo Negrini, Academic Editor

Abstract

Cronobacter (previously known as Enterobacter sakazakii) is a genus of Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, oxidase-negative, catalase-positive, rod-shaped bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae. These organisms cause a variety of illnesses such as meningitis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and septicemia in neonates and infants, and urinary tract, wound, abscesses or surgical site infections, septicemia, and pneumonia in adults. The total gene content of 379 strains of Cronobacter spp. and taxonomically-related isolates was determined using a recently reported DNA microarray. The Cronobacter microarray as a genotyping tool gives the global food safety community a rapid method to identify and capture the total genomic content of outbreak isolates for food safety, environmental, and clinical surveillance purposes. It was able to differentiate the seven Cronobacter species from one another and from non-Cronobacter species. The microarray was also able to cluster strains within each species into well-defined subgroups. These results also support previous studies on the phylogenic separation of species members of the genus and clearly highlight the evolutionary sequence divergence among each species of the genus compared to phylogenetically-related species. This review extends these studies and illustrates how the microarray can also be used as an investigational tool to mine genomic data sets from strains. Three case studies describing the use of the microarray are shown and include: (1) the determination of allelic differences among Cronobacter sakazakii strains possessing the virulence plasmid pESA3; (2) mining of malonate and myo-inositol alleles among subspecies of Cronobacter dublinensis strains to determine subspecies identity; and (3) lastly using the microarray to demonstrate sequence divergence and phylogenetic relatedness trends for 13 outer-membrane protein alleles among 240 Cronobacter and phylogenetically-related strains. The goal of this review is to describe microarrays as a robust tool for genomics research of this assorted and important genus, a criterion toward the development of future preventative measures to eliminate this foodborne pathogen from the global food supply.

Keywords: Cronobacter, microarray, data mining

1. Introduction

Cronobacter spp. are opportunistic foodborne pathogens that are gaining attention for their ability to cause meningitis, septicemia, necrotizing enterocolitis and pneumonia in neonates (defined here as infants 28 days old or younger) and older infants [1,2,3,4]. Infantile infections have been epidemiologically linked to the consumption of contaminated batches of temperature-abused and reconstituted powdered infant formula (PIF). It is clear at this time that contamination can occur intrinsically and extrinsically. However, it has also been noted by Jason [5] that 8% (7 out of 82) of infected infants with invasive disease (defined as a culture-positive, confirmed case of septicemia or meningitis) did consume breast milk exclusively (without supplementation with PIF or powdered human milk fortifiers) prior to the onset of illness. Because PIF is not manufactured as a sterile product, it poses a significant risk if it is prepared and handled inappropriately. The most likely cause of some infections has been poor hygiene of PIF preparers. However, little is known about the source of infections involving adult cases [1]. Even though there is an abundance of published genomes for members of this genus, genomics-based epidemiology is not well documented. Primarily this is because phenotypic assessment alone cannot identify isolates at the species level; molecular assays are needed [1,2,3]. Additionally, Cronobacter spp. are recognized to be considerably more globally and ecologically widespread than once thought, and they have been found associated with other low water activity foods besides PIFs and follow-up formulas such as milk protein products, cereals, cheeses, licorice, candies, spices, teas, nuts, herbs, ready-to-eat foods such as pastas and vegetables, as well as filth and stable flies, and PIF or milk powder production facilities and household environments, and water [6,7]. Cronobacter can also survive growth conditions of extreme desiccation (high osmotic stress) and it is thought that this property influences its environmental persistence in powdered infant formula factories, other dried products and dry environments [6,7]. Together, it is now thought that this widespread occurrence and resistance to desiccation allows for the commercial re-distribution of contaminated low water activity–type foods, posing a greater risk to susceptible consumers and widening the scope of public health concerns [6,7,8,9,10,11].

Neonates are extremely vulnerable to invasive infection with Cronobacter, and such infections often times progress to chronic neurological sequelae such as hydrocephalus, permanent neurological damage and mental disabilities, which result in life-long developmental challenges or death; reported estimated mortality rates for this age group are as high as 80% [5,12]. Cronobacter has also been known to cause disease in adults, most notably in elderly and immuno-compromised individuals [4,13,14,15]. Recent surveillance data from the USA suggest that there are actually a higher percentage of Cronobacter infections in adults than in infants, even though invasive disease and higher mortalities are found in infants. Adults usually present clinically with extra-intestinal infections such as urinary tract and wound infections, as well as cases of septicemia and pneumonia [4].

Epidemiologically, C. sakazakii, Cronobacter malonaticus, and Cronobacter turicensis are the most important pathogenic species which cause the majority of severe illnesses in all age groups [2,3]. Some studies suggest that C. malonaticus may be responsible for more infections associated with adults than C. sakazakii or C. turicensis [15], but detailed epidemiology studies involving correctly identified organisms are warranted. Other species of Cronobacter associated with human illness include Cronobacter universalis, Cronobacter muytjensii, and C. dublinensis. Only Cronobacter condimenti has not been found associated with human illness, but at this time there is only one strain known [16,17].

2. Previous Work in the Development of a DNA Microarray for Cronobacter Species Identity

Globally, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and its food safety collaborators share a responsibility to protect public health, and their collective capability is enhanced through the advancement of methods that can rapidly identify and characterize foodborne pathogens [1,2,3]. The rapidity of this response ensures that fewer consumers will come in contact with contaminated products and in doing so may prevent larger outbreaks from occurring [1,2,3]. The goals of this review are to describe the phylogenetic diversity among each Cronobacter species while also illustrating the utility of a custom-designed pan-genomic microarray platform to mine datasets for public health laboratorian use and source attribution. The sequences used to design the microarray were obtained through the whole genome sequencing efforts of a five-member International Cronobacter Consortium (ICC) [18]. The microarray is an Affymetrix MyGeneChip Custom Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA; design number: FDACRONOa520845F) which utilized whole genome sequences and assemblies of 15 Cronobacter strains, as well as 18 plasmids (Table 1). Previously, a detailed pan-genome analysis of the species type strains also contributed to the design of the microarray [19]. For greater details of the design of the microarray, please see Tall et al. [18]. In total, 21,658 (19,287 Cronobacter-specific and 2371 virulence factor gene sequences) gene targets were used in designing the probe sets for the microarray and they followed similar schemes developed earlier by the FDA as described for Salmonella [20], Escherichia coli [21] and Listeria [22]. The pan-genomic DNA microarray with its concise annotation showed that it could differentiate each Cronobacter species and correctly identify and characterize the phylogenetic relatedness among strains isolated during surveillance and outbreak investigations. Figure 1 is an example of a phylogenetic analysis describing the evolutionary relationship of 379 Cronobacter strains isolated from clinical, food and environmental sources using the microarray gene difference calls [18]. In addition to distinguishing the seven Cronobacter species from one another and from non-Cronobacter species, the microarray could also group isolates into unique clusters based on their genomic diversity or allelic gene sequence divergence. Supplementary Table 1 presents the Pearson’s correlation coefficients of each summarized microarray experiment for the 379 strains shown in Figure 1. Supplementary Table S2 presents the metadata associated with these strains.

Figure 1
Phylogenetic analysis of 379 Cronobacter strains after interrogation with the Food and Drug Administration Cronobacter microarray. The tree was developed using the Neighbor net (SplitsTree4) joining method which was constructed using gene differences ...
Table 1
Number of gene features associated with the Cronobacter genomes that were used in the design of the microarray a.

3. Recent Work Describing the Use of the Cronobacter Microarray to Data Mine Specific Alleles

The data shown in Figure 1 support and complement the phylogenic sequence divergence of the genus as described by others [18,19] and Stephan et al. [23], who used phylogenetic analyses using whole genome sequencing. Microarray analysis clearly captures and emphasizes the genomic diversity among each species member of the genus. Recently, Yan et al. [24] utilized this microarray to characterize the phylogenetic relatedness among Cronobacter strains obtained during an environmental surveillance study of several European PIF production facilities. Results from this study showed that the microarray was able to accurately assess each strain’s identity, could differentiate Cronobacter species from their nearest neighbors, and it further defined two phylogenetic lineages among the C. sakazakii sequence type (ST) ST-4 strains. Microarray analysis separated these groups of C. sakazakii isolates into multiple clusters which were also segregated according to sequence type. Interestingly, the microarray grouped 25 ST-4 isolates into two distinct subclusters. Strains from lineage 1 differed from those in lineage 2 by 24–71 genes, seven of which were phage-related and 17 were associated with the pESA3-harbored type 6 secretion system (T6SS) gene cluster. Using PCR assays described by Franco et al. [25], Yan et al. [24] were able to confirm that these unique ST-4 lineages were segregated according to differences ascribing to the strain’s type 6 secretion system which is found on the common virulence plasmid pESA3. This illustrates that the microarray improved and more accurately defined the phylogenetic genomic content of genes associated with pESA3 found in this important meningitis-causing group [25]. Together, these examples emphasize the many attributes of the Cronobacter microarray, the most powerful of which is its ability to assess the dispensable genome within and among each of the Cronobacter species. This enables one to further elucidate the evolutionary associations among disproportionately dispersed but vertically obtained genomic features, as well as horizontally acquired mobile elements.

Previously, Iversen et al. [16] showed that of the three subspecies (subsp.) of C. dublinensis, C. dublinensis subsp. dublinensis can utilize both malonate and myo-inositol, while C. dublinensis ssp. lactaridi utilizes only myo-inositol, and C. dublinensis subsp. lausannensis cannot utilize either of the two substrates. Grim et al. [19] showed that the alleles represented on the microarray for malonate utilization were associated with genome region (GR) 34 and the alleles for myo-inositol utilization were located in GR29. Microarray analysis of the species type strain C. dublinensis subsp. dublinensis LMG23823T (synonyms: CFS237 or E187) confirmed that this strain possessed genes associated with both malonate and myo-inositol utilization operons, which augments and confirms the molecular presence of these operons involved in the phenotype described by Iversen et al. [16] for C. dublinensis subsp. dublinensis [18]. Furthermore, Tall et al. [18] used the microarray to mine the genomic content for both sets of these genes in 18 other C. dublinensis strains and demonstrated that C. dublinensis subsp. dublinensis strains contained both sets of gene clusters and that only C. dublinensis subsp. lactaridi possessed the myo-inositol utilization operon. Conversely, microarray analysis of C. dublinensis subsp. lausannensis strains confirmed that these strains lacked both gene clusters.

Another example of the usefulness of the microarray to mine phylogenetically-related information is demonstrated by performing the microarray analysis on 240 Cronobacter and phylogenetically-related species to determine sequence divergence among outer-membrane protein (OMP) genes which encode for several OMPs such as OmpA; OmpX; porins OmpC, D, E, and F; a conjugative plasmid transfer protein (CTP); molecular chaperon GroEL; and an OM autotransporter protein (Omatp) [26]. The microarray contains 58 OMP alleles (probe sets) representing these genes among the seven Cronobacter species (summarized in Supplementary Table S3). Microarray analysis demonstrated that particular alleles such as the omatp gene (NCBI Reference number: ABU77334) from C. sakazakii present on the microarray are more species-specific in that all 204 C. sakazakii strains and only one of 12 C. turicensis strains were positive for omatp, while representative strains of the other five species were microarray-negative. A similar sequence divergence trend was observed for ompC (NCBI Reference number: ABU76243) and ompF (NCBI Reference number: ABU77659) from C. malonaticus and C. turicensis where only seven of nine C. malonaticus and two of 12 C. turicensis strains were positive for ompC and ompF, respectively, while representative strains of the other species were negative for these species-specific OMP probe sets [27]. However, the ompC allele (NCBI Reference number: ABU76243) from C. muytjensii was determined to be present in approximately 99% (239 out of 240) of the strains. A similar trend was also seen with the ompA allele (NCBI Reference number: ABU79362) from C. turicensis which was found to be present in 99% of the strains, whereas the ompA allele (NCBI Reference number: ABU76166) from C. dublinensis subsp. lausannensis was only found in the C. dublinensis and the C. universalis strains. The probe set for the groEL allele (NCBI Reference number: ABU75458) from C. turicensis captured 99% of the strains analyzed except for C. condimenti, demonstrating that this allele is common among six of the seven species. Interestingly, the ctp probe set (NCBI Reference number: ABU77334) from C. sakazakii was also present in a high percentage of strains (96%) from all species except for C. condimenti, whereas the mipA probe sets from C. dublinensis subsp. lausannensis and C. condimenti (NCBI Reference number: ABU77421) only were positive in C. dublinensis and C. condimenti strains and mipA was not found in any other strain (species). These results again support the phylogenetic relationships generated using whole genome sequence information [19,23], and demonstrate the utility of the microarray to study the phylogenetic relationship of a specific set of alleles [11,18,19]. Outer-membrane protein genes have been submitted to NCBI under a Cronobacter GenomeTrakr Project: FDA-Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Bioproject 258403 [27,26].

4. Future Directions

Important questions concerning the phylogenetic relatedness of Cronobacter isolates belonging to the seven species groups are just now “coming of age”, as several groups are trying to link genotype with pathotype [28,29]. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques such as whole genome sequencing and microarray efforts have unambiguously spurred on in silico analyses of this important group of foodborne pathogens [19,30,31,32,33]. A substantial amount of genomic plasticity has been found among Cronobacter species [19,30,31,32,33]. For example, Zeng et al. [34] have estimated that over 16% of the genome in C. sakazakii strain ATCC BAA-894 consists of a prophage sequence and Grim et al. [19] described the presence of multiple T6SS systems, transposons, insertion sequence elements, and integrative and conjugative elements among the various Cronobacter species genomes. Studies have also shown that each species possesses a single chromosome, but may possess multiple plasmids. At least one of these plasmids, pESA3-like, possesses a common backbone consisting of the origin of the replication gene repA and two iron acquisition systems [19] and, according to Eshwar et al. [28], is important in virulence. These data have also shown that the seven species within Cronobacter can be divided into two major clades that appeared to have diverged from a common ancestor [19]. Interestingly, each Cronobacter species may have subsequently evolved under different selection pressures that resulted in the presence or absence of selected regions of the respective genomes. High-throughput techniques such as DNA sequencing and microarray provide deep and enriched datasets feeding to bioinformatic analysis which could provide ample insights into the emergent and unrecognized pathogenic properties of Cronobacter spp. Next generation sequencing also provides opportunities to conduct microbial ecological studies on this organism found in clinical, food, industry, and environmental samples, to obtain a better understanding of its interaction with hosts and foods, and thus, its survival in diverse ecological niches.

5. Conclusions

The principal focus of the research described in this review centers on using a pan-genome-based DNA microarray to subtype Cronobacter strains and to understand the sequence divergence of species-specific alleles. In this context, the microarray will also be just as useful in understanding gene expression or transcriptomics, i.e., understanding the physiology of an organism cultured under specific growth conditions. Using transcriptomics in conjunction with RNA sequencing should provide researchers with valuable insights into the survival strategies used by Cronobacter in powdered infant formula and other dry foods. Additional uses of microarrays would be the interrogation of strains found associated with clinical samples, which will help confirm or identify relevant virulence factors, and such microarrays would also be a useful tool to understand the distribution and prevalence of genes among species and strains. In summary, the FDA Cronobacter microarray is an undeniably powerful tool in the future of food safety and public health against the threat of foodborne illness epidemics caused by Cronobacter. Over the last few decades, Cronobacter contamination of commercial powdered infant formula products has apparently been reduced, but as illustrated by Patrick et al. [4], the occurrence of infections is still an ongoing problem. Furthermore, Farmer recommends that Cronobacter infections be made a reportable disease to the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System and he strongly argues that this action be ratified by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, as is the case for many other serious infectious diseases [35].

Acknowledgments

We thank the student internship programs of the International Offices of Kyungpook National University, Daegu, and Gachon University, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea, for sponsoring student interns: Boram Lee, Eunbi Park, Hyerim Choi, JiHyeon Park, Seungeun Jeong, and YeonJoo Yoo, TaeJung Chung, SoYoung Jun, and Mijeong Kim, respectively. We thank the Office of Undergraduate Research and Internship Programs, the Joint institute of Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, for sponsoring student interns Hannah R. Chase, Flavia Negrete, and Samantha Finkelstein. Lastly, we thank the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, for sponsoring research fellow Hannah. R. Chase. Funds supporting this work were obtained internally through U.S. FDA appropriations.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2076-3905/6/1/6/s1. Table S1: Pearson correlation coefficients, Table S2: Metadata for tested strains, Table S3: Outer-membrane proteins (OMP) probe sets.

Author Contributions

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript. The student interns also edited the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Yan Q.Q., Condell1 O., Power K., Butler F., Tall B.D., Fanning S. Cronobacter species (formerly known as Enterobacter sakazakii) in powdered infant formula: A review of our current understanding of the biology of this bacterium. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012;113:1–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05281.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Jaradat Z.W., Al Mousa W., Elbetieha A., Al Nabulsi A., Tall B.D. Cronobacter spp.—Opportunistic food borne pathogen. A review of its virulence and environmental adaptive traits. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014;63:1023–1037. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.073742-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Tall B.D., Chen Y., Yan Q.Q., Gopinath G.R., Grim C.J., Jarvis K.G., Fanning S., Lampel K.A. Cronobacter: An emergent pathogen causing meningitis to neonates through their feeds. Sci. Prog. 2014;97:154–172. doi: 10.3184/003685014X13994743930498. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Patrick M.E., Mahon B.E., Greene S.A., Rounds J., Cronquist A., Wymore K., Boothe E., Lathrop S., Palmer A., Bowen A. Incidence of Cronobacter spp. infections, United States, 2003–2009. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014;20:1520–1523. doi: 10.3201/eid2009.140545. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Jason J. Prevention of invasive Cronobacter infections in young infants fed powdered infant formulas. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e1076–e1084. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3855. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Osaili T., Forsythe S. Desiccation resistance and persistence of Cronobacter species in infant formula. Intern. J. Food Microbiol. 2009;136:214–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.08.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Chen W., Yang J., You C., Liu Z. Diversity of Cronobacter spp. isolates from the vegetables in the middle-east coastline of China. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;32:90. doi: 10.1007/s11274-016-2033-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. El-Sharoud W.M., El-Din M.Z., Ziada D.M., Ahmed S.F., Klena J.D. Surveillance and genotyping of Enterobacter sakazakii suggest its potential transmission from milk powder into imitation recombined soft cheese. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008;105:559–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03777.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Enterobacter sakazakii infections associated with the use of powdered infant formula—Tennessee, 2001. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2002;51:297–300. [PubMed]
10. Noriega F.R., Kotloff K.L., Martin M.A., Schwalbe R.S. Nosocomial bacteremia caused by Enterobacter sakazakii and Leuconostoc mesenteroides resulting from extrinsic contamination of infant formula. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 1990;9:447–449. [PubMed]
11. Yan Q., Fanning S. Strategies for the identification and tracking of Cronobacter species: An opportunistic pathogen of concern to neonatal health. Front. Pediatr. 2015;3:38. doi: 10.3389/fped.2015.00038. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Bowen A.B., Braden C.R. Invasive Enterobacter sakazakii disease in infants. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006;12:1185–1189. doi: 10.3201/eid1208.051509. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Gosney M.A., Martin M.V., Wright A.E., Gallagher M. Enterobacter sakazakii in the mouths of stroke patients and its association with aspiration pneumonia. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2006;17:185–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2005.11.010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Holý O., Petrželová J., Hanulík V., Chromá M., Matoušková I., Forsythe S.J. Epidemiology of Cronobacter spp. isolates from patients admitted to the Olomouc University Hospital (Czech Republic) Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2014;63:69–72. [PubMed]
15. Alsonosi A., Hariri S., Kajsík M., Oriešková M., Hanulík V., Röderová M., Petrželová J., Kollárová H., Drahovská H., Forsythe S., et al. The speciation and genotyping of Cronobacter isolates from hospitalised patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015;34:1979–1988. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2440-8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Iversen C., Mullane N., McCardell B., Tall B.D., Lehner A., Fanning S., Stephan R., Joosten H. Cronobacter gen. nov., a new genus to accommodate the biogroups of Enterobacter sakazakii, and proposal of Cronobacter sakazakii gen. nov., comb. nov., Cronobacter malonaticus sp. nov., Cronobacter turicensis sp. nov., Cronobacter muytjensii sp. nov., Cronobacter dublinensis sp. nov., Cronobacter genomospecies 1, and of three subspecies, Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. dublinensis subsp. nov., Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lausannensis subsp. nov. and Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lactaridi subsp. nov. Int. J. System. Evol. Microbiol. 2008;58:1442–1447. [PubMed]
17. Joseph S., Cetinkaya E., Drahovska H., Levican A., Figueras M.J., Forsythe S.J. Cronobacter condimenti sp. nov., isolated from spiced meat, and Cronobacter universalis sp. nov., a species designation for Cronobacter sp. genomospecies 1, recovered from a leg infection, water and food ingredients. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012;62:1277–1283. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.032292-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Tall B.D., Gangiredla J., Gopinath G.R., Yan Q.Q., Chase H.R., Lee B., Hwang S., Trach L., Park E., Yoo Y.J., et al. Development of a custom-designed, pan genomic DNA microarray to characterize strain-level diversity among Cronobacter spp. Front. Pediatr. 2015;3:66. doi: 10.3389/fped.2015.00036. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Grim C.J., Kotewicz M.L., Power K.A., Gopinath G., Franco A.A., Jarvis K.G., Yan Q.Q., Jackson S.A., Sathyamoorthy V., Hu L., et al. Pan-genome analysis of the emerging foodborne pathogen Cronobacter spp. suggests a species-level bidirectional divergence driven by niche adaptation. BMC Genom. 2013;14:366 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-366. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Li B., Jackson S.A., Gangiredla J., Wang W., Liua H., Tall B.D., Jean-Gilles Beaubrun J., Jay-Russell M., Vellidis G., Elkins C.A. Genomic evidence reveals numerous re-introduction events of Salmonella enterica serovar Newport in irrigation ponds in Suwannee watershed. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:8243–8253. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02179-15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Jackson S.A., Patel I.R., Barnaba T., LeClerc J.E., Cebula T.A. Investigating the global diversity of Escherichia coli using a multi-genome DNA microarray platform with novel gene prediction strategies. BMC Genom. 2011;12:349 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-349. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Laksanalamai P., Jackson S.A., Mammel M.K., Datta A.R. High density microarray analysis reveals new insights into genetic footprints of Listeria monocytogenes strains involved in listeriosis outbreaks. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e32896 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032896. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Stephan R., Grim C.J., Gopinath G.R., Mammel M.K., Sathyamoorthy V., Trach L.H., Chase H.R., Fanning S., Tall B.D. Re-examination of the taxonomic status of Enterobacter helveticus sp. nov., Enterobacter pulveris sp. nov., and Enterobacter turicensis sp. nov. as members of Cronobacter: Proposal of two new genera Siccibacter gen. nov. and Franconibacter gen. nov. and descriptions of Siccibacter turicensis sp. nov., Franconibacter helveticus sp. nov., and Franconibacter pulveris sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014;64:3402–3410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Yan Q.Q., Wang J., Gangiredla J., Cao Y., Martins M., Gopinath G.R., Stephan R., Lampel K., Tall B.D., Fanning S. Comparative genotypic and phenotypic analysis of Cronobacter species cultured from four powdered infant formula production facilities: Indication of patho-adaptation along the food chain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:4388–4402. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00359-15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Franco A.A., Hu L., Grim C.J., Gopinath G., Sathyamoorthy V., Jarvis K.G., Lee C., Sadowski J., Kim J., Kothary M.H., et al. Characterization of Putative Virulence Genes Encoded on the related RepFIB Plasmids Harbored by Cronobacter spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011;77:3255–3267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03023-10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Cronobacter GenomeTrakr Project 258403: FDA-CFSAN. [(accessed on 28 February 2017)]; Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/258403.
27. Kothary M.H., Gopinath G.R., Gangiredla J., Rallabhandi P.V., Harrison L.M., Yan Q.Q., Chase H.R., Lee B., Park E., Yoo Y., et al. Analysis and Characterization of Proteins Associated with Outer Membrane Vesicles Secreted by Cronobacter spp. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:134. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00134. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Eshwar A.K., Tall B.D., Gangiredla J., Gopinath G.R., Patel I.R., Neuhauss S.C.F., Stephan R., Lehner A. Linking Genomo- and Pathotype: Exploiting the Zebrafish Embryo Model to Investigate the Divergent Virulence Potential among Cronobacter spp. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0158428 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158428. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Cruz A., Xicohtencatl-Cortes J., González-Pedrajo B., Bobadilla M., Eslava C., Rosas I. Virulence traits in Cronobacter species isolated from different sources. Can. J. Microbiol. 2011;57:735–744. doi: 10.1139/w11-063. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Stephan R., Lehner A., Tischler P., Rattei T. Complete genome sequence of Cronobacter turicensis LMG 23827, a food-borne pathogen causing deaths in neonates. J. Bacteriol. 2011;193:309–310. doi: 10.1128/JB.01162-10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Kucerova E., Clifton S.W., Xia X.Q., Long F., Porwollik S., Fulton L., Fronick C., Minx P., Kyung K., Warren W., et al. Genome sequence of Cronobacter sakazakii BAA-894 and comparative genomic hybridization analysis with other Cronobacter species. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9556 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009556. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Power K.A., Yan Q., Fox E.M., Cooney S., Fanning S. Genome sequence of Cronobacter sakazakii SP291, a persistent thermotolerant isolate derived from a factory producing powdered infant formula. Genome Announc. 2013;1:e0008213. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00082-13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Moine D., Kassam M., Baert L., Tang Y., Barretto C., Ngom Bru C., Klijn A., Descombes P. Fully Closed Genome Sequences of Five Type Strains of the Genus Cronobacter and One Cronobacter sakazakii Strain. Genome Announc. 2016;4:e00142-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00142-16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Zeng H., Zhang J., Li C., Xie T., Ling N., Wu Q., Ye Y. The driving force of prophages and CRISPR-Cas system in the evolution of Cronobacter sakazakii. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:40206. doi: 10.1038/srep40206. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Farmer J.J., III My 40-year history with Cronobacter/Enterobacter sakazakii—Lessons learned, myths debunked, and recommendations. Front. Pediatr. 2015;3:84.35. doi: 10.3389/fped.2015.00084. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Microarrays are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)