PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
PLoS One. 2017; 12(3): e0173767.
Published online 2017 March 20. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0173767
PMCID: PMC5358767

Streptococcus suis sortase A is Ca2+ independent and is inhibited by acteoside, isoquercitrin and baicalin

Concepción Gonzalez-Bello, Editor

Abstract

Sortase A (SrtA) has long been recognized as an ideal drug target for therapeutic agents against Gram-positive pathogens. However, the SrtA of Streptococcus suis (Ss-SrtA), an important zoonotic agent, has not been studied. In this study, the enzymatic properties of Ss-SrtA were investigated, and inhibition of Ss-SrtA by natural products was evaluated. Ss-SrtA was expressed and purified. The purified recombinant Ss-SrtA had maximal activity at pH 6.0–7.5, 45°C, and showed a Km of 6.7 μM for the hydrolysis of substrate abz-LPATG-dnp. Different from Staphylococcus aureus SrtA (Sa-SrtA) which is stimulated by Ca2+, Ss-SrtA was observed to be Ca2+ independent. Structural analysis showed that salt bridges formed between K111 and D180 in Ss-SrtA replaced the function of Ca2+ in Sa-SrtA to stabilize the substrate-binding cleft. Site-directed mutagenesis identified H126, C192 and R200 as the key residues of Ss-SrtA active site. To discover potential inhibitors, the percent inhibition of sortase activity by natural products was measured. Among these selected natural products, acteoside, isoquercitrin and baicalin were discovered as novel SrtA inhibitors, with IC50 values of 36.3 ± 1.3 μM, 100.0 ± 1.3 μM and 85.4 ± 1.5 μM, respectively. The inhibitory effects of these three natural products were further confirmed on endogenous Sa-SrtA. Using a previously established S. aureus model with a fluorescent-labeled Sa-SrtA substrate, acteoside, isoquercitrin, and baicalin showed 86%, 28% and 45% inhibition on endogenous Sa-SrtA activity, respectively. Overall, these findings shed new light on enzymatic properties, Ca2+-independent catalytic mechanism and potential inhibitors of Ss-SrtA.

Introduction

Streptococcus suis is one of the most important bacterial pathogens in pigs, causing major economic losses to the swine industry worldwide [1]. It is also an emerging zoonotic agent of human meningitis and streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome [1]. S. suis is receiving growing attention not only for its role in increasingly reported severe infections in humans but also for its increasing resistance to antibiotics. High rates of S. suis resistance to tetracyclines, macrolides, β-lactams, aminoglycosides, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, and fluoroquinolones have been frequently reported in pig isolates worldwide [2, 3]. Vaccines are being developed to prevent S. suis infection, such as whole-cell bacterins, autogenous bacterins in piglets, and live-attenuated vaccines. However, their protection effects are thus far unsatisfactory [4], stressing the urgent need for the study of novel therapeutic strategies against S. suis infection.

Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria display surface proteins that play critical roles in adhesion and invasion of host cells or evasion of host-immune responses [5]. Many of these proteins are covalently linked to the cell wall peptidoglycan through C-terminal sorting signal with the conserved LPXTG motif [6]. Sortase A (SrtA) is a membrane-associated transpeptidase responsible for the anchoring of these surface proteins to the cell wall by recognition of the LPXTG motif [6]. Therefore, SrtA plays a critical role in Gram-positive bacterial pathogenesis and is considered a promising anti-infective target. The other important feature of SrtA is that it is not required for bacterial growth, thus its inhibitors will not exert selective pressures to promote the development of antibiotic resistance [7]. Furthermore, SrtA resides on the extracellular side of the cell membrane and it increases the chance to interact with inhibitors [8]. Therefore, SrtA is an attractive drug target for the development of anti-infective drugs.

So far, detailed structural studies have been limited to SrtAs from S. aureus (Sa-SrtA) [911] and S. pyogenes (Sp-SrtA) [12]. These sortases share a similar 8 stranded β-barrel-fold structure despite of sequence diversity. The Cys, His and Arg residues clustered at the center of a long cleft are identified as the key catalytic residues for these sortases [13]. The main enzymatic difference between Sa-SrtA and Sp-SrtA is their dependence on Ca2+. It has been found that Ca2+ stimulates the activity of Sa-SrtA by 8-fold, whereas the activity of Sp-SrtA is not promoted by Ca2+ [12]. This has been explained by the different residue arrangements of the β3/β4 loop and β6/β7 loop in SrtA structures [11, 12]. Over the past decade, useful investigations have been performed to identify inhibitors of Sa-SrtA to combat the alarming increase in antimicrobial resistance, and promising inhibitor compounds have been discovered [13]. The results show that natural products are good resource for SrtA inhibitors.

In the case of S. suis, a mutant lacking srtA fails to display surface proteins and is defective in the establishment of infections [14, 15]. Genome sequencing reveals that S. suis encodes 33 surface proteins with the LPXTG sorting signal, which fulfill diverse functions during infection. Therefore, SrtA plays a critical role in S. suis pathogenesis, and SrtA inhibitors may consequently be promising candidates for the treatment and/or prevention of S. suis infections. In this study, we biochemically characterized Ss-SrtA. By screening 11 natural products, new promising Ss-SrtA inhibitors were discovered.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. S. suis strains were cultured in Todd–Hewitt broth (THB; Oxoid Ltd.) without shaking or Todd–Hewitt broth agar plates at 37°C with 5% CO2. E. coli and S. aureus strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm or plated on LB agar. If required, cultures were supplemented with antibiotics at the following concentrations: erythromycin, 3 μg ml−1 for S. aureus; ampicillin, 100 μg ml−1 for E. coli.

Table 1
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

Bioinformatics analysis

The signal peptide was predicted by SignalP 3.0 [18]. Multiple protein sequences were aligned using ClustalW [19], and further processed with the ESPript programs [20]. Protein structure homology modeling was performed using the SWISS-MODEL Workspace (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/). Structural alignment, analysis and graph preparation were performed with PyMOL [21].

Protein expression and purification

The DNA sequence encoding Ss-SrtA (GenBank No. YP_001198440) residues N24-Q235 was cloned into the Nde I-Xho I restriction sites of the pET22b vector, yielding p22SsSrtA. The E. coli BL21 (DE3) strain was transformed with the recombinant plasmid and grown in LB medium containing 100 μg mL-1 ampicillin at 37°C with continuous shaking. When the OD600nm reached 0.4–0.6, Ss-SrtA expression was induced by isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) with a final concentration of 0.5 mM. Cells were grown for 5 h before harvesting by centrifugation. For protein purification, cell pellets were suspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris·HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole, pH 7.5), lysed by sonication, and then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was then loaded onto a HisTrap HP 5-mL column (GE Healthcare), subsequently rinsed with lysis buffer and wash buffer (50 mM Tris·HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 40 mM imidazole, pH 7.5), and then rinsed with elution buffer (50 mM Tris·HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 150 mM imidazole, pH 7.5). Subsequent purification was performed on FPLC by gel filtration (50 mM Tris·HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) on HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare). SDS-PAGE was performed with 12% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels. The protein concentration was measured by the absorbance at 280 nm using a calculated extinction coefficient: 30,370 M-1cm-1.

Site-directed mutagenesis

Plasmid p22SsSrtA was used as the template for the introduction of desired mutations. The mutation was introduced by PCR using the appropriate primers listed in Table 2. After PCR, the amplified plasmids were digested overnight at 37°C with Dpn I and then transformed into E. coli DH5α. Mutants H126A, C192A, and R200A were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The mutants were expressed and purified as described above for Ss-SrtA.

Table 2
Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.

Activity of Ss-SrtA

Ss-SrtA activity was monitored in 96-well black microtiter plates (PerkinElmer) using an internally quenched fluorescent peptide substrate abz-LPATG-dnp (Shanghai GL Biochem) [21]. For standard conditions, each well contained 2.5 μM purified recombinant Ss-SrtA in 200 μL of 50 mM Tris·HCl and 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 4 μL of 1 mM abz-LPATG-dnp. The increase in the fluorescence intensity was continuously monitored at 37°C for 30 min using an EnSpire Multilabel Reader (PerkinElmer) at an excitation wavelength of 309 nm and emission wavelength of 420 nm. The fluorescence was plotted against time and the initial velocity (V0) was calculated as the slope of the linear portion of the curve.

For Km determination, final substrate concentrations ranging from 0.375 μM to 64 μM were used. Km was determined by nonlinear regression using the GraphPad Prism software.

Effects of temperature, pH and ions on Ss-SrtA activity

The optimal pH was determined under the standard conditions at the indicated pH. The following buffers were used: buffer A (50 mM acetic acid, 50 mM MES, 20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl) for pH 3.55–7.5, and buffer B (50 mM MES, 20 mM Tris, 50mM CHES, 150 mM NaCl) for pH 5.5–11.0. The pH stability was determined by incubating Ss-SrtA at the indicated pH at 37°C for 60 min. The residual activities were measured under the standard condition. The activity of the Ss-SrtA maintained at 4°C, and pH 7.5 was set as 100% activity. The optimal temperature was determined under the standard condition at the indicated temperatures. The temperature stability was determined by incubating Ss-SrtA at the indicated temperatures and, pH 7.5 for 60 min. The residual activities were measured under the standard condition. The effects of ions were determined by incubating Ss-SrtA with 5 mM metal ions in 50 mM Tris·HCl and 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, at 37°C for 60 min. The residual activities were measured under the standard condition. The Ss-SrtA activity under standard condition was set as 100% activity.

Inhibition of Ss-SrtA activity by natural products

All natural products were dissolved in DMSO to a concentration of 40 mM as a stock solution. For the 200 μL reaction, Ss-SrtA was mixed with each natural product in 50 mM Tris·HCl and 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, to give a final concentration of 200 μM. The reaction mixture was pre-incubated for 10 min at 25°C, and catalysis was initiated by adding 4 μL of 1 mM abz-LPATG-dnp. The V0 obtained in the absence of inhibitor was taken as 100% and designated as the control value, and the initial inhibitory velocity (Vi) was obtained in the presence of natural products. The percent inhibition was calculated according to the following equation: inhibitory rate = (1 − Vi/V0) × 100%. Compounds with inhibitory rates against Ss-SrtA greater than 50% were used for IC50 determination. For IC50 calculations, each natural product at 7 concentrations (ranging from 3 to 200 μM) was pre-incubated with Ss-SrtA, and inhibitory rates were determined as described above. IC50 values were determined using a sigmoidal dose–response with the GraphPad Prism software. Triplicate measurements were taken for each data point.

Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of natural products

Wild-type S. suis were cultured in THB medium in a 96-wells plate in the presence of serial dilutions (0.24 to 500 μM) of natural products at 37°C with 5% CO2. After 24 hours, the wells were visually inspected, and the first clear well was designated as the MIC. All experiments were repeated independently three times.

Detection of the inhibitory effects of acteoside, baicalin, and isoquercitrin using an established peptide-incorporation model

To date, there has been a need for a good model to detect the activity of endogenous Ss-SrtA in live S. suis cells. Very recently, such a model was developed in S. aureus for the incorporation of fluorescent-labeled peptide to the cell wall by SrtA [22]. As the amount of peptide incorporated was found to be dependent upon the activity of SrtA and could be conveniently analyzed by flow cytometry, it may also be a useful model to evaluate the effects of SrtA inhibitors against endogenous SrtA. Here, we utilized this model to determine the inhibitory effects of acteoside, baicalin, and isoquercitrin on SrtA activity with live cells.

Incorporation of the fluorescent peptide (FITC-conjugated AKKSELPETGGEESTNKRRNKKNHK, designated substrate 5; Shanghai GL Biochem) by endogenous SrtA was performed as described with slight modifications [22]. In brief, overnight cultures of S. aureus were diluted 1:100 in fresh LB medium and grown at 37°C with continuous shaking (200 rpm) to the late stationary growth phase. After collection by centrifugation, bacteria were washed three times with PBS and then resuspended in SrtA buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, pH 7.5). Rather than immediately initiation of the peptide incorporation by adding substrate 5, as described previously [22], here, the cell suspension was aliquoted and incubated with or without 200 μM inhibitors for 1 h. Then, using a final volume of 100 μL in 96-well plates, reactions were initiated by adding 125 μM substrates 5, and then incubated in the dark for 17 h at 37°C with shaking. Bacteria were collected by centrifugation and washed with PBS. After treatment with 1% SDS at 60°C for 5 min, bacteria were collected by centrifugation and washed with PBS. The washed bacteria were resuspended in 200 μL of 4% formaldehyde in PBS and then incubated for 15 min at room temperature. Bacteria were centrifuged and washed with PBS and then resuspended in 500 μL of PBS; bacteria-associated fluorescence was measured on a FACS FC 500 flow cytometer and analyzed using CXP Software (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).

Results

Expression and purification of Ss-SrtA

Ss-SrtA was expressed in E. coli and purified (Fig 1). SDS-PAGE showed that purified recombinant Ss-SrtA had a molecular weight of approximately 25 kDa. This was consistent with the calculated molecular weight of the recombinant Ss-SrtA, which contained Ss-SrtA residues N24-Q235 and a 6 residue C-terminal His-tag.

Fig 1
SDS-polyacrylamide gel showing the purified Ss-SrtA expressed by E. coli.

Effects of temperature and pH on Ss-SrtA activity and Km to abz-LPATG-dnp

The effects of temperature and pH on Ss-SrtA were examined. As shown in Fig 2, the optimum temperature for the enzymatic activity was 45°C (Fig 2A) and the optimum pH was 6–7.5 (Fig 2B). The enzyme retained at least 70% activity after 1 h of incubation at various temperatures up to 45°C (Fig 2C). The enzyme was stable (70% residual activity) over 60 min at pH values from 5.5 to 9 (Fig 2D). The Km of Ss-SrtA for the hydrolysis of an internally quenched fluorescent peptide substrate abz-LPATG-dnp was 6.70 μM (Fig 3A).

Fig 2
Effects of temperature and pH on the enzyme activity and stability.
Fig 3
Km calculation and effects of metal ions.

Ss-SrtA was Ca2+ independent

To investigate whether metal ions affected Ss-SrtA activity, the activities of Ss-SrtA in the presence of different metal ions were determined. As shown in Fig 3B, the cations Mg2+, Ca2+, K+ showed no significant effect on the activity of Ss-SrtA. In contrast, Ss-SrtA was completely inactivated by Cu2+, Co2+, and Zn2+. As well-known heavy metal ions, Cu2+, Co2+ and Zn2+ might inhibit the activity of Ss-SrtA by reacting with the functional group of Ss-SrtA and destructing the enzymatic structure. Partial inactivation by Mn2+ was observed. It is previously reported that the activity of Sa-SrtA is stimulated by Ca2+ [23]. However, the activity of Ss-SrtA was Ca2+ independent. The presence of Ca2+ did not affect catalytic efficiency of Ss-SrtA. The similar Ca2+-independency was also observed for Sp-SrtA [12].

Model of the structure of Ss-SrtA

Ss-SrtA consisted of 235 amino acids and exhibited high sequence similarity to that of both S. pyogenes and S. pneumoniae (60% identity). As shown in Fig 4A, sequence alignments of these sortases were performed. The alignments revealed that H126, C192 and R200 were aligned well with active sites residues H142, C192 and R216 of Sp-SrtA, respectively, suggesting that these three residues might be the key catalytic residues in Ss-SrtA. To further explore the structural features of Ss-SrtA, the three-dimensional structure of Ss-SrtA was simulated using Sp-SrtA as a template model whose structure has been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PBD 3FN5). As shown in Fig 4B, the simulated Ss-SrtA structure was similar to that of Sp-SrtA. The overall structure adopted the same 8-stranded β-barrel fold unique to sortases [9, 10]. Sterically, C192 and R200 presented on the β7 and β8 strands, respectively, with H126 on a loop extending from the β4 strand. These three residues were sterically identical to the active site residues C208, R216 and H142 of Sp-SrtA [12], respectively. To functionally investigate the proposed roles of these three residues, the mutations H126A, C192A and R200A were constructed. All these mutations resulted in the loss of enzymatic activities against abz-LPATG-dnp, indicating that these three residues played critical roles in Ss-SrtA activity (data not shown). Taken together, H126, C192 and R200 were the key catalytic residues in Ss-SrtA.

Fig 4
Structure alignments of Ss-SrtA and its similarities.

Residues K111 and D180 play key roles on Ca2+-independence of Ss-SrtA

Previous studies reveal that Ca2+ stimulates the activity of Sa-SrtA by 8-fold [20]. Ca2+ acts as an allosteric activator by stabilizing the structure of the β3/β4 loop and β6/β7 loop in Sa-SrtA in a closed, substrate-binding state. E105, E108, D112 and E171 are identified as the residues to which the Ca2+ binds [912, 23] (graphically shown in Fig 4C). In contrast to Sa-SrtA, the activities of Sp-SrtA and Ss-SrtA in this study were not dependent on Ca2+ [12]. Consistent with this finding, no structural equivalents in Sp-SrtA and Ss-SrtA were found for the four residues E105, E108, D112 and E171 in Sa-SrtA. A lysine (K126) was found to occupy the corresponding Ca2+ position in Sp-SrtA [23], but no further information for the Ca2+ independence of Sp-SrtA was provided. By structural alignment, we found that K111 on β3/β4 loop in Ss-SrtA was positioned at the same location as K126 in Sp-SrtA (Fig 4D). Further analysis revealed that D180 on β6/β7 loop was close enough to K111 to form a salt bridge. This salt bridge stabilized the closed state of the substrate contacting β6/β7 loop without assistance of extra Ca2+ ion, implying the mechanism of the Ca2+ independence of Ss-SrtA and Sp-SrtA. Sequence alignment revealed that these two residues were highly conserved in streptococcal sortases (Fig 4A, indicated by solid triangles). These findings suggested that all these streptococcal sortases might be Ca2+ independent.

Acteoside, baicalin and isoquercitrin were newly identified as SrtA inhibitors

To find potent Ss-SrtA inhibitors, the 11 natural products listed in S1 Table were selected for experimental validation using purified recombinant Ss-SrtA. As shown in Fig 5A, 8 of these natural products strongly inhibited the activity of Ss-SrtA, showing >65% inhibitory rates at a concentration of 200 μM. Baicalein and wogonin slightly inhibited the activity of Ss-SrtA, showing 47% and 37% inhibitory rates, respectively, while gingerol barely affected the activity of Ss-SrtA. IC50 further indicated berberine hydrochloride, curcumin, isoquercitrin, acteoside, baicalin and quercetin were strong inhibitors for Ss-SrtA, with concentrations lower than 100 μM inhibiting >50% activity of Ss-SrtA (Fig 5B). Among these 6 natural compounds, berberine hydrochloride, curcumin, and quercetin have been determined to be strong SrtA inhibitors either with SrtA for S. aureus [24, 25] or Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) [26], while isoquercitrin, acteoside, and baicalin are firstly identified as strong SrtA inhibitors in this study. Using the microtiter broth dilution method, we measured the MIC values of all these natural products to be >500 μM (S1 Table). These results indicate that these natural products do not function as antibiotics for S. suis.

Fig 5
Inhibition of Ss-SrtA activity by natural products.

Acteoside strongly inhibited the activity of SrtA on S. aureus cells

Substrate 5 could be covalently incorporated into the cell wall of S. aureus in a SrtA-dependent manner [22]. However, we failed to observe the incorporation of substrate 5 into the cell wall of wildtype S. suis grown at different growth phases (data not shown). Because substrate 5 was originally designed on the basis of a natural substrate (a fibronectin-binding protein) for Sa-SrtA [22], we speculated that Ss-SrtA did not recognize substrate 5. Although sortases from different Gram-positive bacteria are structurally similar, the amino acid identity between sortases is limited to a few key residues at or near the active site [27]. Therefore, we asked whether these newly discovered inhibitors could inhibit Sa-SrtA in vivo. After 17h of incubation with substrate 5, wildtype S. aureus showed remarkable fluorescence that was associated with bacterial cells. This indicated that significant amounts of substrate 5 were incorporated into the cell wall. In contrast, limitd fluorescence was detected for S. aureus ΔsrtA strain, which confirmed that the incorporation of substrate 5 was mainly mediated by endogenous SrtA (Fig 6). In agreement with the inhibitory effects of isoquercitrin, acteoside, and baicalin on Ss-SrtA protein, they all inhibited the incorporation of substrate 5 into the S. aureus cell wall by endogenous Sa-SrtA (Fig 6). However, the inhibitory rates of isoquercitrin and baicalin on endogenous Sa-SrtA (28% and 45%, respectively) were much lower than those on Ss-SrtA protein (81% and 95%, respectively). By contrast, acteoside exhibited high inhibitory rates on both endogenous Sa-SrtA (86%) and Ss-SrtA protein (98%), which suggested that this natural product was a potential inhibitor for SrtA from different Gram-positive bacteria.

Fig 6
In vivo inhibition of staphylococcal sortase.

Discussion

S. suis, an emerging drug-resistant animal and human pathogen, may contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance genes to streptococcal human pathogens such as S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, and S. agalactiae, acting as a resistance reservoir [3]. The identification of alternative therapeutic and preventive strategies against S. suis infections has become a priority. One strategy is to develop anti-infective therapies against gram-positive bacteria, focusing on small molecules that interfere with virulence protein regulation. SrtA has always been recognized as a potential target for anti-infective treatment and its inhibition represents a promising and effective strategy for the treatment and / or prevention of Gram-positive pathogen infections. In this study, Ss-SrtA was biochemically characterized and several natural products were screened as Ss-SrtA inhibitors.

Ss-SrtA, the product of open-reading frame SSU05_1074, exhibited approximately 60% identity with other reported streptococcal sortases. The purified recombinant Ss-SrtA had maximal activity at pH 6.0–7.5 and 45°C, stable at pH 6–9 and temperature lower than 45°C. The pH dependence was compatible with a reverse protonation mechanism [28]. These properties helped S. suis to anchor surface proteins to the cell wall in order to promote its survival in human or swine blood which had a pH close to 7.35–7.45 and a temperature of either 37°C or 41°C. Structural analysis and site-directed mutagenesis showed that H126, C192, and R200 were the key catalytic residues of Ss-SrtA, corresponding to residues H142, C208 and R216 in Sp-SrtA, respectively. The three residues were highly conserved in other Gram-positive bacteria. The Km of Ss-SrtA to internally quenched fluorescent peptide substrate abz-LPATG-dnp was 6.7 μM, indicating it had higher affinity to abz-LPATG-dnp than Sa-SrtA, the Km of which to the same substrate was 17.5 μM [29] These enzymatic characterizations provided useful information for future Ss-SrtA study.

Different from Sa-SrtA, whose activity was stimulated by Ca2+ [23], both Sp-SrtA and Ss-SrtA were found to be Ca2+ independent [12]. In Sa-SrtA, Ca2+ forms bonds with residues E105, E108, D112 and E171 to stabilize the structure of the β3/β4 loop and β6/β7 loop into a closed, substrate-binding state in Sa-SrtA [12]. Structural analysis revealed that a lysine (K111 in Ss-SrtA, K126 in Sp-SrtA) occupied the Ca2+ position observed in Sa-SrtA. We found that the D180 was near enough to K111 to form a salt bridge in Ss-SrtA. This aspartic acid residue was also conserved in Sp-SrtA. The salt bridge stabilized the structure of the β3/β4 loop and β6/β7 loop in Ss-SrtA and in Sp-SrtA, especially stabilized the structure at the closure of the substrate-binding cleft. This resulted a stable substrate-binding cleft in absence of Ca2+ in Ss-SrtA and Sp-SrtA. This explained why the activities of Ss-SrtA and Sp-SrtA were Ca2+ independent. Overall, the lysine at the position of K126 and the asparatic acid at the position of D180 in Ss-SrtA played key roles in the Ca2+ independence of Ss-SrtA. These two residues were highly conserved in other streptococcal sortases, suggesting all these sortases might be Ca2+ independent. The findings remain to be further confirmed by mutagenesis and ion effect studies.

Until recently, Indirect methods have been used to detect the presence of surface proteins in the cell wall to evaluate the inhibition of endogenous sortase activity by inhibitors, including protein A (SpA) and clumping factors A and B [29]. However, it did not account for the possibility that SrtA inhibitors might block the expression of these SrtA-anchored surface proteins. Very recently, a feasible approach was developed to incorporate a fluorescent-labeled synthetic peptide into the cell wall of S. aureus by endogenous SrtA [22]. As the amount of peptide incorporation was dependent on the activity of SrtA and could be conveniently detected by flow cytometry, it could also be a useful model for evaluating inhibitory effects on endogenous SrtA by inhibitors. In the present study, we utilized this model to determine the inhibitory effects of acteoside, baicalin, and isoquercitrin on Ss-SrtA activity on live cells. Unfortunately, S. suis did not incorporate this fluorescent peptide, substrate 5, into the cell wall as S. aureus did (data not shown) [22]. Because substrate 5 was designed based on a natural substrate (a fibronectin-binding protein) of Sa-SrtA, we speculated that substrate 5 might be not recognized by endogenous Ss-SrtA. Therefore, for future studies of Ss-SrtA, an appropriate fluorescent peptide substrate based on the natural substrates of Ss-SrtA, such as, SSads [30], SsnA [31] and Fbps [32], should be developed.

Over the past decade, natural products have been considered as a good source for screening SrtA inhibitors [13]. In this study, we screened Ss-SrtA inhibitors from 11 natural products, and found that berberine hydrochloride, curcumin, isoquercitrin, acteoside, baicalin and quercetin were strong inhibitors for purified recombinant Ss-SrtA. Berberine hydrochloride, curcumin, and quercetin have been determined to be strong SrtA inhibitors for S. aureus [24, 25] or S. mutans [26]. Our results revealed that these three natural products had lower inhibitory activities for S. suis sortase than that of S. aureus and S. mutans. Acteoside, baicalin and isoquercitrin were identified as strong SrtA inhibitors for the first time. When using this substrate 5-incorproation S. aureus model, unlike the strong inhibitory activities of isoquercitrin and baicalin on Ss-SrtA, much lower inhibitory rates were observed on endogenous Sa-SrtA (28% and 45%, respectively), indicating that these two inhibitors could not be widely used. By contrast, acteoside displayed high inhibitory rates on both endogenous Sa-SrtA (86%) and Ss-SrtA protein (98%), suggesting that such natural products were potential inhibitors for sortases from various Gram-positive pathogens.

By biochemical characterization, structural analysis and inhibitor screening, these results shed new light on enzymatic properties, Ca2+-independent catalytic mechanism and potential inhibitors of Ss-SrtA. These findings will contribute to the development of Ss-SrtA inhibitors, especially acteoside-based inhibitors.

Supporting information

S1 Table

Summary of 11 natural products screened in this study and their MIC values.

(DOCX)

Funding Statement

This work was supported by 1) National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 31602094); 2) National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 31500112); and 3) Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (QC2016044). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

This paper was supported by the following grant(s):

National Nature Science Foundation 31602094 to Fuguang Chen.
National Nature Science Foundation 31500112 to Yueling Zhang.

Data Availability

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.

References

1. Nahuel Fittipaldi MS, Grenier Daniel & Gottschalk Marcelo*1. Virulence factors involved in the pathogenesis of the infection caused by the swine pathogen and zoonotic agent Streptococcus suis. Future Microbiol. 2012;7(7):259–79. [PubMed]
2. Gurung M, Tamang MD, Moon DC, Kim SR, Jeong JH, Jang GC, et al. Molecular Basis of Resistance to Selected Antimicrobial Agents in the Emerging Zoonotic Pathogen Streptococcus suis. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2015;53(7):2332–6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00123-15 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Palmieri C, Varaldo PE, Facinelli B. Streptococcus suis, an Emerging Drug-Resistant Animal and Human Pathogen. Frontiers in microbiology. 2011;2:235 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00235 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Segura M. Streptococcus suis vaccines: candidate antigens and progress. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2015;14(12):1587–608. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2015.1101349 [PubMed]
5. Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Ganesh VK, Hook M. Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nature reviews Microbiology. 2014;12(1):49–62. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3161 [PubMed]
6. Maresso AW, Schneewind O. Sortase as a target of anti-infective therapy. Pharmacol Rev. 2008;60(1):128–41. doi: 10.1124/pr.107.07110 [PubMed]
7. Cascioferro S, Cusimano MG, Schillaci D. Antiadhesion agents against Gram-positive pathogens. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(10):1209–20. doi: 10.2217/fmb.14.56 [PubMed]
8. Cascioferro S, Totsika M, Schillaci D. Sortase A: an ideal target for anti-virulence drug development. Microb Pathog. 2014;77:105–12. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.10.007 [PubMed]
9. Ilangovan U, Ton-That H, Iwahara J, Schneewind O, Clubb RT. Structure of sortase, the transpeptidase that anchors proteins to the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(11):6056–61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101064198 [PubMed]
10. Suree N, Liew CK, Villareal VA, Thieu W, Fadeev EA, Clemens JJ, et al. The structure of the Staphylococcus aureus sortase-substrate complex reveals how the universally conserved LPXTG sorting signal is recognized. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(36):24465–77. Epub 2009/07/14. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.022624 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Zong Y, Bice TW, Ton-That H, Schneewind O, Narayana SV. Crystal structures of Staphylococcus aureus sortase A and its substrate complex. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(30):31383–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401374200 [PubMed]
12. Race PR, Bentley ML, Melvin JA, Crow A, Hughes RK, Smith WD, et al. Crystal structure of Streptococcus pyogenes sortase A: implications for sortase mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(11):6924–33. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805406200 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Cascioferro S, Raffa D, Maggio B, Raimondi MV, Schillaci D, Daidone G. Sortase A Inhibitors: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. J Med Chem. 2015;58(23):9108–23. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00779 [PubMed]
14. Vanier G, Sekizaki T, Dominguez-Punaro MC, Esgleas M, Osaki M, Takamatsu D, et al. Disruption of srtA gene in Streptococcus suis results in decreased interactions with endothelial cells and extracellular matrix proteins. Vet Microbiol. 2008;127(3–4):417–24. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.08.032 [PubMed]
15. Wang C, Li M, Feng Y, Zheng F, Dong Y, Pan X, et al. The involvement of sortase A in high virulence of STSS-causing Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Arch Microbiol. 2009;191(1):23–33. doi: 10.1007/s00203-008-0425-z [PubMed]
16. Chen C, Tang J, Dong W, Wang C, Feng Y, Wang J, et al. A glimpse of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome from comparative genomics of S. suis 2 Chinese isolates. PloS one. 2007;2(3):e315 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000315 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Chen F, Liu B, Wang D, Wang L, Deng X, Bi C, et al. Role of sortase A in the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus-induced mastitis in mice. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;351(1):95–103. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12354 [PubMed]
18. Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol. 2004;340(4):783–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028 [PubMed]
19. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 [PubMed]
20. Robert X, Gouet P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Web Server issue):W320–4. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku316 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Delano WL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System2002.
22. Hansenova Manaskova S, Nazmi K, van 't Hof W, van Belkum A, Martin NI, Bikker FJ, et al. Staphylococcus aureus Sortase A-Mediated Incorporation of Peptides: Effect of Peptide Modification on Incorporation. PloS one. 2016;11(1):e0147401 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147401 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Naik MT, Suree N, Ilangovan U, Liew CK, Thieu W, Campbell DO, et al. Staphylococcus aureus Sortase A transpeptidase. Calcium promotes sorting signal binding by altering the mobility and structure of an active site loop. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(3):1817–26. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M506123200 [PubMed]
24. Kang SS, Kim JG, Lee TH, Oh KB. Flavonols inhibit sortases and sortase-mediated Staphylococcus aureus clumping to fibrinogen. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006;29(8):1751–5. [PubMed]
25. Park BS, Kim JG, Kim MR, Lee SE, Takeoka GR, Oh KB, et al. Curcuma longa L. constituents inhibit sortase A and Staphylococcus aureus cell adhesion to fibronectin. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(23):9005–9. doi: 10.1021/jf051765z [PubMed]
26. Hu P, Huang P, Chen WM. Curcumin inhibits the Sortase A activity of the Streptococcus mutans UA159. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;171(2):396–402. doi: 10.1007/s12010-013-0378-9 [PubMed]
27. Marraffini LA, Dedent AC, Schneewind O. Sortases and the art of anchoring proteins to the envelopes of gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70(1):192–221. Epub 2006/03/10. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.70.1.192-221.2006 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Frankel BA, Kruger RG, Robinson DE, Kelleher NL, McCafferty DG. Staphylococcus aureus sortase transpeptidase SrtA: insight into the kinetic mechanism and evidence for a reverse protonation catalytic mechanism. Biochemistry. 2005;44(33):11188–200. Epub 2005/08/17. doi: 10.1021/bi050141j [PubMed]
29. Zhang J, Liu H, Zhu K, Gong S, Dramsi S, Wang YT, et al. Antiinfective therapy with a small molecule inhibitor of Staphylococcus aureus sortase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(37):13517–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408601111 [PubMed]
30. Liu P, Pian Y, Li X, Liu R, Xie W, Zhang C, et al. Streptococcus suis adenosine synthase functions as an effector in evasion of PMN-mediated innate immunity. J Infect Dis. 2014;210(1):35–45. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu050 [PubMed]
31. de Buhr N, Neumann A, Jerjomiceva N, von Kockritz-Blickwede M, Baums CG. Streptococcus suis DNase SsnA contributes to degradation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and evasion of NET-mediated antimicrobial activity. Microbiology. 2014;160(Pt 2):385–95. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.072199-0 [PubMed]
32. de Greeff A. Contribution of Fibronectin-Binding Protein to Pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis Serotype 2. Infection and Immunity. 2002;70(3):1319–25. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.3.1319-1325.2002 [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science