Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 44549.
Published online 2017 March 20. doi:  10.1038/srep44549
PMCID: PMC5357951

Polyphonic sonification of electrocardiography signals for diagnosis of cardiac pathologies


Electrocardiography (ECG) data are multidimensional temporal data with ubiquitous applications in the clinic. Conventionally, these data are presented visually. It is presently unclear to what degree data sonification (auditory display), can enable the detection of clinically relevant cardiac pathologies in ECG data. In this study, we introduce a method for polyphonic sonification of ECG data, whereby different ECG channels are simultaneously represented by sound of different pitch. We retrospectively applied this method to 12 samples from a publicly available ECG database. We and colleagues from our professional environment then analyzed these data in a blinded way. Based on these analyses, we found that the sonification technique can be intuitively understood after a short training session. On average, the correct classification rate for observers trained in cardiology was 78%, compared to 68% and 50% for observers not trained in cardiology or not trained in medicine at all, respectively. These values compare to an expected random guessing performance of 25%. Strikingly, 27% of all observers had a classification accuracy over 90%, indicating that sonification can be very successfully used by talented individuals. These findings can serve as a baseline for potential clinical applications of ECG sonification.

In medicine, technological advancements lead to a rapidly growing amount of data. Visualization techniques are usually applied to support data inspection and analysis1,2 However, visualization is just one way to make information intelligible to humans. An alternative approach is sonification, i.e. the systematic and reproducible representation of data by using sound3. Sonification has been applied to gene expression data4, DNA methylation data5, biological imaging data6, electroencephalography (EEG) signals7,8,9, electrocardiogram (ECG) signals7,10 and combinations of biomedical signals11.

Coming from a clinical background, we asked whether sonification techniques (used in so-called auditory displays) of complex data sets can aid clinicians in their diagnostic decision making. Specifically, we focused on ECG signals as complex multi-channel datasets with ubiquitous applications in the clinic. Although previous studies have proposed techniques for heart rate sonification12 and ECG sonification10,11, no study has evaluated in how far these techniques are actually suited for clinical application of ECG analysis.

To investigate this questions, we first designed a parameter-mapping sonification13 method that applies time-variant oscillators to convert the multi-channel ECG datasets into a polyphonic sound. Secondly, we applied this method to samples from a publicly available database14. Thirdly, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of common cardiac pathologies based on sonified ECG signals.

Material and Methods

Ethics statement

In this retrospective study, we used human ECG measurements that are openly accessible in a public database14. All patient data were fully anonymized and could not be traced back to any individual patient. Our institution’s medical ethics board II (Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany) gave their consent to this data analysis (decision number 2016–856R-MA, granted to FGZ) and waived the need for informed consent by the respective patients. All analyses were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with the ethics board approval.


We used a selection of 12-channel ECG signals from the “St.-Petersburg Institute of Cardiological Technics 12-lead Arrhythmia Database“ (incartdb) on www.physionet.org14. From the 12-channel datasets, we extracted the first six leads, corresponding to the electric vectors in the frontal plane (I, II, III, aVR, aVL, avF). We selected the following four pathologies: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), premature ventricular contraction/ventricular extrasystole (PVC), atrial fibrillation and bigeminy. The reason for this selection was (a) that these pathological patterns represent frequent pathological findings in ECGs and (b) that these patterns were among the most frequent patterns in the database. For each category, we retrieved a single 10 s sample for training and three 10 s samples for testing. Furthermore, from the “PTB database”15,16 on www.physionet.org14, we retrieved a 12-lead ECG data set of a healthy control subject.

Data usage statement

All raw ECG data can be downloaded from www.physionet.org14 as stated above. All other data (including all sound samples) are available as supplementary Files S1, S2 and S3. A detailed flowchart of the algorithm is available as supplementary File S4. All Matlab® source codes used for this study are available under the MIT license ( and can be accessed via the following DOI: [10.4119/unibi/2908653]. Also, we provide an implementation in for the open source platform SuperCollider that can be accessed via the following DOI: [10.4119/unibi/2908653]. All performance data collected during the data analysis by all observers are available as supplementary File S5.

Computational implementation and hardware

The approaches described in the preceding sections have been implemented in Matlab® (R2015b, Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA). All experiments were carried out on a standard computer workstation (2.2 GHz Intel Core i7, 16 GB RAM). All statistical calculations were carried out using Matlab®. Statistical error is given as mean ± standard deviation if not otherwise noted. To test for significance, we used one-tailed Student’s t-test. Sound samples were played on “Bose SoundLink Mini II” loudspeakers (Bose, Framingham, MA, USA). The entire code required to reproduce the experiments is freely available to the public (see “Data usage” section).

Polyphonic ECG sonification

The aim of our study was to develop and test a method for polyphonic sonification of pathological ECG signals. We used 6-channel ECG signals (Fig. 1a) and assigned each channel a note on the standard western chromatic musical scale (visualized in Fig. 1b as a musical note). The voltage of each ECG channel was mapped to the amplitude of the corresponding sound signal (and thus perceptually controls its loudness in a nonlinear way). Similar to Hermann et al.17, the voltage was furthermore continuously mapped to a frequency variation of 3% (i.e. half of a semi-tone) for each channel separately. In summary, higher (resp. lower) voltage manifest as louder and slightly up-pitched (resp. softer and slightly downpitched) notes, and the overall sonification is a continuous stream of six notes playing simultaneously.

Figure 1
Principle of polyphonic sonification of multi-channel ECG data.

For aesthetic reasons we selected the D minor scale (146.83 Hz, 174.61 Hz, 220.00 Hz, 293.67 Hz, 349.23 Hz, 440.00 Hz) over two octaves. In order to compensate for the unequal loudness at the different frequencies we linearly reduced the amplitude of the channels’ notes from 100% (for the lowest pitch) to 30% (for the highest pitch). While this is not exactly an equal loudness contour as suggested in the Robinson-Dadson curves, it is subjectively balanced. We also added a fixed set of harmonics An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep44549-m1.jpg to each channel with k = 3, 4, 5 and amplitude as 15%, 5% and 5% of the fundamental frequency An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep44549-m2.jpg). This results in a more complex timbre for the channels’ sound streams. Note that the 2nd harmonic An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep44549-m3.jpg has been left out intentionally to diminish spectral confusion with the ECG channels 4–6, which are octave-shifted fundamentals of channels 1–3. We refer to this specific version of the parameter-mapping on time-variant oscillators as “polyphonic sonification”. A flowchart of the algorithm including relevant parameters is available in supplementary Figure S4.

The results of this sonification technique are available in the supplementary data: S1 ( contains a normal ECG of a healthy control sample. In S2 (, the channels from a pathological ECG are sonified incrementally, i.e. ECG lead III alone, then III and aVF, then III and aVF and II, etc. It can be heard that the individual channels can be identified even if they are played simultaneously.

Data analysis

After sonification, the data were analyzed by 22 blinded observers (one co-author of this paper [TK] and 21 other members of our departments and our professional environment). This was to test whether our technique can be used to distinguish clinically relevant cardiac pathologies. Observers who performed the data analysis belonged to any of the following three groups. Group 1: N = 10 medical students with completed cardiology course or young physicians in their first to third year of clinical practice (“cardio course completed”), Group 2: N = 7 medical students before completion of their cardiology course (“before cardiology course”), Group 3: N = 5 science students (undergraduate and graduate) with no formal training in cardiology whatsoever (“other science students”). We theoretically explained the method to all observers, demonstrated the incremental buildup of six channels to a polyphonic sound sample and successively played four pathological 10 second sound samples (one sample per target category, each sample played twice). During the demonstration of the sound samples, observers were visually shown the underlying data as presented in Fig. 2. Observers were not allowed to go back to the training examples during the testing session. Examples used during the training session were not re-used in the testing session. Then, we played 12 short (10 s) sound samples and asked the participants to classify each sample into exactly one of four categories. Examples for the four types of pathologies are depicted in Fig. 2 and can be listened to in the supplementary data S3 (

Figure 2
Pathological ECG samples used for auditory data analysis.


ECG datasets can be polyphonically sonified

In this study, we developed a new method to convert digital ECG signals to sound (“sonification”). We found that it is possible to process samples from a publicly available database and that the resulting sound is subjectively rated as pleasant (see supplementary File

Pathological ECG signals can be distinguished after sonification

To test human classification accuracy of sonified ECGs, sonified data were analyzed by N = 22 observers. After all observers had analyzed the data, we assessed whether sonified ECG signals could be used to distinguish clinically relevant cardiac pathologies. We found that in this analysis, there were marked differences between the three groups of observers (Fig. 3): Group 1 (medical students with completed cardiology training or resident physicians) scored highest (N = 10, average performance 78 ± 22%), followed by group 2 (medical students before their cardiology course, N = 7, 68 ± 18%). Group 3 (undergraduate or graduate science students without any formal training in cardiology) had the lowest scores (N = 5, 50 ± 30%). These values were all well above the expected baseline performance of 25% that corresponds to random guessing in a four-category classification experiment. We performed a univariate analysis (one-tailed student’s t-test) and found that Group 1 and Group 3 significantly differed (p = 0.028) in terms of classification performance. All other comparisons of groups were not significant (p > 0.05). 6 of 22 (27%) of all observers had a correct classification rate of over 90% (Fig. 4).

Figure 3
Group performance in blinded assessment of ECG signals.
Figure 4
Classification performance of blinded observers.

We also asked all observers whether they had been actively playing an instrument for three or more years at any time during their lives. In a univariate analysis of this variable, those N = 13 observers that had musical training achieved higher scores than the other group (74 ± 21% vs. 59 ± 28%). However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.09, one-sided t-test).

Premature ventricular contractions are most easily detected in sonified ECGs

From the set of 264 data points in our experiments, we analyzed which type of ECG abnormality was most easily detected. We found that classification performance was best in the class “premature ventricular contraction” (PVC) with 89% correct classifications (see Fig. 5). This expected outcome can be attributed to the fact that it is the only of the 4 conditions where the rhythmical features deviate significantly. Generally, this underpins our assumption that rhythmical features and their deviation are a kind of structure that is easily perceived in an auditory display.

Figure 5
Confusion matrix of the classification.


In this study, we demonstrate for the first time that minimally trained observers can successfully analyze sonified ECG data and detect clinically relevant pathological patterns. Although the training period was only approximately ten minutes, most observers were able to intuitively grasp the sonification technique and to successfully apply it to unknown samples. Classification performance was significantly better in those with formal training in cardiology compared to other observers. This shows that users who are already trained to visually detect abnormalities in ECG signals can make use of this ability in classifying sonified ECGs as well. Consequently, their mental representation of pathological ECG patterns is not restricted to visual patterns. Another interesting finding during our study was that 24% of all observers achieved very high classification accuracies (over 90%). These participants can serve as a proof of principle, showing that it is possible for human observers to reliably classify sonified pathological ECG patterns. During data analysis, several observers reported that they found the classification task to be easier towards the end of the analysis, suggesting a yet unexploited capacity of auditory learning and classification improvement with more extensive training or even longitudinal use. Further analyses of our data set showed that among the four selected ECG patterns, premature ventricular contractions were most easily detected. We attribute this to the fact that only in those ECG samples of our four conditions, a regular rhythm is disrupted by isolated events.

It should be noted that the present study has limited statistical power: 22 blinded observers analyzed the data and showed a good overall performance, in almost all cases well above the random guessing accuracy of 25%. Also, we detected differences between the groups, with the best performance among observers that were formally trained in cardiology. Still, to clearly demonstrate in which circumstances the sonification methods yields best results and which group of observers might benefit most, more research is needed. A first step would be the validation of our findings in a larger study with more different types of pathological ECG samples. We plan to optimize our method to render task-specific structures more salient, which can then evaluate refined sonification types against the actual baseline. It will also be interesting to investigate in how far a time-compression affects classification, assuming that a significant time reduction can be achieved for diagnosis.

Another interesting perspective is the combination of data sonification with data visualization. In our personal experience, simultaneous presentation of sonified and visualized ECG data allows a very efficient detection of abnormal signals. In the future, these synergies between visual and auditory data presentation should be further investigated.

Finally, concerning more precise differential diagnosis, more subtypes of pathological ECG patterns could be investigated such as anterior vs. posterior/inferior myocardial infarctions. Our study serves as a starting point for these inquiries because it demonstrates for the first time that humans are capable of making use of this type of data presentation in a clinical setting.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Kather, J.N. et al. Polyphonic sonification of electrocardiography signals for diagnosis of cardiac pathologies. Sci. Rep. 7, 44549; doi: 10.1038/srep44549 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information:
Supplementary Material S1:
Supplementary Material S2:
Supplementary Material S3:
Supplementary Material S5:


We want to thank all of our colleagues who contributed to the data analysis for this study. We acknowledge the financial support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg within the funding programme Open Access Publishing. This research was partially supported by the Cluster of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology ‘CITEC’ (EXC 277) at Bielefeld University.


The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions J.N.K. conceived the sonification method. J.N.K. and F.G.Z. planned the study. T.H. and L.R.S. gave important advice for the method development. T.H. implemented the method in SuperCollider. T.K. analyzed ECG data and substantially contributed to discussing the findings. J.N.K., Y.B. and F.G.Z. performed statistical analyses. J.N.K., T.H. and F.G.Z. wrote the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and gave intellectual input to the conclusions being drawn.


  • O’Donoghue S. I. et al. . Visualizing biological data-now and in the future. Nat Methods 7, S2–4, doi: (2010).10.1038/nmeth.f.301 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Walter T. et al. . Visualization of image data from cells to organisms. Nat Methods 7, S26–41, doi: (2010).10.1038/nmeth.1431 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hermann T. Taxonomy and Definitions for Sonification and Auditory Display. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD), Paris, France. Atlanta, GA, USA: Georgia Tech Library (2008).
  • Staege M. S. A short treatise concerning a musical approach for the interpretation of gene expression data. Sci Rep 5, 1–13, doi: (2015).10.1038/srep15281 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brocks D. Musical patterns for comparative epigenomics. Clin Epigenetics 7, 1–5, doi: (2015).10.1186/s13148-015-0127-8 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hermann T., Nattkemper T. W., Schubert W. & Ritter H. Sonification of Multi-Channel Image Data. Proceedings of the Mathematical and Engineering Techniques in Medical and Biological Sciences, 745–750 (2000).
  • Avbelj V. Auditory display of biomedical signals through a sonic representation: ECG and EEG sonification. Proceedings of the 35th International Convention MIPRO, IEEE Digital Library, 474–475 (2012).
  • Baier G., Hermann T. & Stephani U. Event-based sonification of EEG rhythms in real time. Clin Neurophysiol 118, 1377–1386 (2007). [PubMed]
  • Hinterberger T. Orchestral sonification of brain signals and its application to brain-computer interfaces and performing arts. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Interactive Sonification (ISON), York, UK. Published on (2007).
  • Worrall D., Thoshkahna B. & Degara N. Detecting Components of an ECG Signal For Sonification. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD), New York, USA. Atlanta, GA, USA: Georgia Tech Library (2014).
  • Kosunen I., Kuikkaniemi K., Laitinen T. & Turpeinen M. Demonstration: Listen to Yourself and Others–Multiuser Mobile Biosignal Sonification Platform EMOListen. Workshop on Multiuser and Social Biosignal Adaptive Games and Playful Applications. Available from: (2010).
  • Ballora M., Pennycook B., Ivanov P. C., Glass L. & Goldberger A. L. Heart rate sonification: A new approach to medical diagnosis. Leonardo 37, 41–46 (2004).
  • Grond F. & Berger J. Parameter mapping sonification. The Sonification Handbook 1st ed., Logos Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 363–397 (2011).
  • Goldberger A. L. et al. . Physiobank, physiotoolkit, and physionet components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 101, e215–e220 (2000). [PubMed]
  • Bousseljot R., Kreiseler D. & Schnabel A. Nutzung der EKG-Signaldatenbank CARDIODAT der PTB über das Internet. Biomedizinische Technik 40, 317 (1995).
  • The PTB Diagnostic ECG Database. doi: .10.13026/C28C71 [Cross Ref]
  • Hermann T., Ungerechts B., Toussaint H. & Grote M. Sonification of pressure changes in swimming for analysis and optimization. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD), Atlanta, GA, USA. Atlanta, GA, USA: Georgia Tech Library (2012).

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group