Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of f1000resSubmitAuthor GuidelinesAboutAdvisory PanelF1000ResearchView this article
Version 1. F1000Res. 2017; 6: F1000 Faculty Rev-269.
Published online 2017 March 14. doi:  10.12688/f1000research.9701.1
PMCID: PMC5357030

Recent advances in understanding and preventing human papillomavirus-related disease


High-risk human papillomaviruses (hrHPV) are responsible for anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers, which together account for at least 5% of cancers worldwide. Industrialised nations have benefitted from highly effective screening for the prevention of cervical cancer in recent decades, yet this vital intervention remains inaccessible to millions of women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), who bear the greatest burden of HPV disease. While there is an urgent need to increase investment in basic health infrastructure and rollout of prophylactic vaccination, there are now unprecedented opportunities to exploit recent scientific and technological advances in screening and treatment of pre-invasive hrHPV lesions and to adapt them for delivery at scale in resource-limited settings. In addition, non-surgical approaches to the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and other hrHPV lesions are showing encouraging results in clinical trials of therapeutic vaccines and antiviral agents. Finally, the use of next-generation sequencing to characterise the vaginal microbial environment is beginning to shed light on host factors that may influence the natural history of HPV infections. In this article, we focus on recent advances in these areas and discuss their potential for impact on HPV disease.

Keywords: Human papillomavirus, cervical cancer, HPV lesions


Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common viral infection of the reproductive tract. Even though most HPV infections are asymptomatic and clear spontaneously, persistent infections with “high-risk” (oncogenic) mucosal HPV (hrHPV) cause approximately 5% of all cancers worldwide. These include almost all cases of cervical cancer––with annually over 500,000 newly diagnosed cases and over 260,000 cervical cancer deaths worldwide––as well as a large proportion of other anogenital carcinomas and oropharyngeal tumours in both women and men 1. The overall burden of HPV-related disease is difficult to estimate, but it is believed that approximately 600,000 annual cases of cervical, anal, penile, vulvar, and vaginal cancers combined are attributable to hrHPV 24 ( Table 1).

Table 1.

High-risk HPV-induced cancers.
SitePercentage of cancers
associated with
high-risk HPV infection
Number of cancers
attributable to
high-risk HPV

Table modified from 3

Cervical cancer is preventable. In the developed world, women who die from cervical cancer either have had little or no screening throughout their lifetime or have not accessed appropriate treatment for abnormal cytology, hence it is not surprising that the majority (around 85%) of the global burden occurs in the less-developed regions with little or no access to screening or prophylactic vaccine programmes 5. An additional concern is that the HIV epidemic has disproportionately affected the same regions and is an important contributing factor to the prevalence and persistence of HPV infections 6. Closing the gap between wealthy and low-income countries in prophylactic HPV vaccine rollout is an international priority. However, even if this were to be achieved in the near future, hundreds of millions of women who have already been exposed to hrHPV will remain at risk of developing cervical cancer without access to affordable tools for screening and treatment of pre-invasive disease. In this article, we review innovations in testing and treatment for hrHPV infection and intraepithelial neoplasias from molecular, clinical, and operational perspectives alongside new insights into pathogenesis (summarised in Figure 1).

Figure 1.
HrHPV-host interactions leading to invasive disease and strategies for intervention.

Advances in screening

HPV prevalence varies largely by geographic region, age, gender, and sexual behaviour. HPV-16 antibody prevalence in females aged 9–26 ranged from 0–33% in Europe and North America to 13–43% in Africa and Central and South America 7. HrHPV-16 and -18 DNA prevalence was consistently lower than antibody prevalence; however, rates varied widely according to age. In a study assessing the impact of prophylactic vaccination in England, prevalence of hrHPV DNA (any of 13 types) in women aged 16–24 during 2012–2013 ranged from 35–44% 8. Although rare, the presence of antibodies against hrHPV in prepubertal children may suggest non-sexual (perinatal or horizontal) transmission routes 7, 9, 10. HPV-16 and -18 cause nearly 70% of cervical cancers. HPV-16 also contributes largely to hrHPV-associated vulvar, vaginal, and penile pre-cancer 11.

For the past five decades, the introduction of screening with the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear test to detect cervical disease early and the implementation of national screening programs have reduced the incidence and mortality of a disease that once caused more deaths amongst women than any other cancer. Liquid-based cytology has widely replaced the conventional Pap testing in recent years, owing to its greater effectiveness, i.e. comparable sensitivity coupled with reduced risk of inadequate sampling 12. However, in the absence of hrHPV testing, high false-positive detection rates can lead to unnecessary referrals to colposcopy. This triggered the recent use of hrHPV DNA testing to triage women with abnormal cytology at screening. Although this is standard of preventive care in high-income countries, access to screening in LMICs is still limited or unavailable. Population-based models have calculated a projected reduction in cervical cancer incidence of 50–60% by 2040 if effective screening and/or treatment methods were to be implemented 13. Fortunately, the growing importance of reducing the burden of HPV-induced cancers has been recently acknowledged by the World Health Organisation and led to the listing of screening and treatment of precancerous lesions to prevent cervical cancer as a “best buy” intervention 14.

HrHPV testing detects over 90% of all high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and is therefore an attractive screening tool, especially in countries with established screening infrastructure. Several countries are due to implement primary hrHPV testing with triage by cytology or, in some settings, partial genotyping 15. Large randomised controlled trials have shown that hrHPV testing, when implemented over several rounds of screening, provided greater protection against CIN2+ or invasive cervical cancer than did cytological screening. Of note, protection was greater with hrHPV screening in women at 30+ years of age and with a screening interval of 5 years than cytological screening every 3 years 1619. Even a single round of HPV testing can have a significant impact on the rate of advanced cervical cancers and cancer deaths in rural India 20. Currently, the implementation of molecular testing in LMICs is limited because of cost and infrastructure requirements 15. However, this might be addressed by using rapid low-cost point-of-care tests such as Xpert HPV, which has shown promise in a field trial in Papua New Guinea 21.

HPV self-testing to collect cervical/vaginal cells offers the potential to improve screening coverage: meta-analyses have concluded that self-testing increased the participation of non-attenders in screening programmes when sampling kits were provided directly to all participants 22. However, the effectiveness of screening by self-sampling is determined in part by the performance of the HPV PCR test when applied to self-samples 23. To bridge the prevention gap in low-/middle- income settings, approaches such as hrHPV self-testing are viable and enable invitation of communities who test positive to attend further triaging 24, 25. Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) or Lugol’s iodine (VILI) is a particularly simple and low-cost screening tool that enables trained healthcare workers to detect abnormalities with a speculum examination. Both methods are especially attractive tools for establishing screening in LMICs, where the infrastructure to provide screening at a national level is not yet in place despite increasing awareness of its importance 2628. HPV urine testing is a non-invasive alternative to conventional cytology sampling that could improve screening uptake in individuals for whom cervical or vaginal sampling may be difficult. A large meta-analysis confirmed that detection HPV test results in urine generally correlate with HPV testing in clinician-taken samples 29, 30. However, data to support urinary HPV testing for the detection of CIN are currently lacking.

HrHPV genotypes are maintained in the general population owing to productive infections rather than inadvertent cancers. Low-grade lesions (CIN1), where infectious particles are produced and shed, tend to regress spontaneously within 18–36 months in immunocompetent hosts 31. Whether a productive life cycle is completed or not depends on the infected epithelial site and the hormonal environment 32. Nevertheless, hrHPV can persist––often for many years––and can drive cell cycle entry and cell proliferation in the basal and parabasal cell layers 33, which distinguishes them from low-risk HPVs. Progression to cancer is a consequence of persistent hrHPV infection that, following integration of the viral genome into host DNA, drives dysregulated viral gene expression. The hrHPV early proteins E6 and E7 inactivate the host tumour suppressors p53 and retinoblastoma protein, resulting in neoplastic transformation. The distinct susceptibility of the transformation zone to neoplastic transformation and progression may also be linked to the increased accessibility and proliferation of the basal cell layers at this metaplastic epithelium 33.

Recently, the predictive value of HPV viral load as a measure of persistence has been investigated: several studies have shown that high baseline HPV-16 and -18 viral load or viral load increase over time are associated with persistent infections 3436 and low viral load, or a >100-fold decline over time, is associated with clearance 3739. Higher viral load was also associated with decreased HPV clearance rates in uncircumcised males and homosexual men who smoke 40, 41. Methylation of CpG sites in HPV DNA is a marker of persistent infection, particularly for HPV-16, that may have utility in triage: in a large randomised controlled trial, methylation triage on cervicovaginal self samples was non-inferior to cytology triage on clinician-taken samples for the detection of high-grade CIN 42.

Advances in therapy of HPV-associated disease

Precancerous cervical lesions can be treated by loop excision of the transformation zone or ablative techniques such as cryotherapy or laser therapy. The use of novel, cheap ablation techniques that do not require external gas supply (such as CryoPen) could provide affordable treatment of precancerous lesions and prevent progression to cancer in LMICs 43. Recently, more conservative approaches in the management of moderate (CIN2) lesions have been adopted in the light of large population-based data indicating high regression rates in young, non-smoking, immunocompetent women in whom minimising the risk of future adverse pregnancy outcomes (second-trimester miscarriage and spontaneous pre-term delivery) is a priority 4447.

A non-surgical therapy for pre-invasive hrHPV lesions is highly desirable given the disadvantages outlined above and the infrastructure required to deliver and monitor the efficacy of ablative treatment, which is a major challenge for LMICs. In addition, there is a need for better therapeutic options for hrHPV-driven lesions at anogenital sites other than the cervix. Tackling chronic and recurrent HPV-induced lesions and the possibility to scale up patient-applied use in LMICs have led to the development of the topical immune response modulators such as imiquimod and Yallaferon®, a recombinant interferon alpha-2b gel, but recurrence rates remain high. Lopinavir and cidofovir, both antiviral drugs, are currently being trialled in precancerous lesions as well as HPV-associated cancers of varying sites 48, 49. Multiple small molecule inhibitors targeting hrHPV DNA-binding activities or the apoptotic sequences of E6/E7 or exhibiting synthetic lethal interactions are still in preclinical development 50. Adoptive T cell therapy comprising infusion of E6- and E7-specific tumour-infiltrating T lymphocytes to facilitate tumour shrinkage is a novel approach to the treatment of metastatic cervical cancer that has shown promise in an exploratory clinical study 51. However, such individualised therapies are challenging to deliver at scale.

Several aspects of hrHPV biology and pathogenesis make it an attractive candidate for targeting with a therapeutic vaccine. The development of a high-grade cervical lesion is the result of failure of host T cell responses to control or indeed clear hrHPV infection, an uncommon event that typically takes 10–15 years and is reversible in up to 30% of cases 31, 5254. Regression of CIN is associated with infiltration of the lesion by CD8+ T cells 55. CD4+ T cells play a crucial role in orchestrating this effector response: immunosuppressive states (e.g. HIV infection, iatrogenic) are associated with reduced HPV clearance rates and increased risk of progression to invasive cancer 5659. T cells recognise viral antigens in the form of peptides that are generated from proteolytically cleaved internal and external proteins and presented on the cell surface in association with HLA class I (CD8+ T cells) and class II (CD4+ T cells) molecules. It is hypothesised that boosting naturally induced hrHPV-specific T cell responses to early viral antigens by vaccination should accelerate the regression of CIN and clearance of infection. Licensed prophylactic vaccines prevent the acquisition of infection through the induction of antibodies to late (capsid) proteins presented in the form of virus-like particles. They have no impact on disease once infection has occurred; therefore, a different vaccine strategy is required to achieve a therapeutic effect. HPV (along with other oncogenic viruses) presents non-self antigens; the development of T cell tolerance is therefore far less likely than is the case for cancers expressing self-antigens. The oncoproteins E6 and E7 have been the antigens of choice for most therapeutic vaccine candidates to date, as they are expressed throughout the virus life cycle and on transformed cells. The development of therapeutic vaccines for hrHPV has encompassed proteins and peptides, viral, bacterial, and DNA vectors, RNA replicons, and dendritic cell-based approaches. As there have been several recent comprehensive reviews 60, 61, we focus on the most clinically advanced strategies.

Peptide- and protein-based vaccines offer safety, stability, and ease of manufacture. However, they are poorly immunogenic unless administered with adjuvants, which may cause unwanted reactogenicity, and efforts to apply this approach to immunotherapy of hrHPV have generally been unsuccessful. A mix of adjuvanted synthetic long peptides from HPV-16 E6 and E7 was found to induce complete regression in 9 out of 19 women with high-grade vulval intraepithelial neoplasia 62. This was an important finding given the very low rate of spontaneous regression of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia and high recurrence rate. A randomised placebo-controlled phase II trial was subsequently initiated to assess the same vaccine strategy in women with HPV-16-positive high-grade CIN. Unfortunately, the study was terminated prematurely because of the reluctance of enrolled patients to defer excisional treatment; therefore, the results were inconclusive 63. A recombinant protein vaccine, GTL001, comprising HPV-16 and -18 E7 fused to catalytically inactive Bordetella pertussis adenylate cyclase, was tested alone and with imiquimod in a phase I study of women with HPV-16 or HPV-18 and normal cytology 64. Sustained viral clearance was observed in the majority of women receiving the higher vaccine dose together with imiquimod.

DNA vaccines are safe and easy to manufacture, do not require a cold chain, and can be administered repeatedly, as they do not elicit vector-specific immunity. However, despite eliciting potent immune responses in small animal models, immunogenicity in humans has been disappointing. Electroporator delivery and adjuvants can overcome this, albeit at the cost of increasing complexity and reactogenicity. The leading candidate is the VGX-3100 vaccine (Inovio Pharmaceuticals), which comprises synthetic consensus HPV-16 and HPV-18 E6 and E7 genes. It has shown the most encouraging results of any therapeutic HPV vaccine candidate to date in a randomised controlled phase IIb trial in 154 women with CIN2/3 65. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, histopathological regression to CIN1 or normal was significantly more frequent in VGX-3100 recipients than in placebos (48.2% vs. 30%). In a post-hoc analysis, the magnitude of E6-specific T cell responses was associated with regression of CIN and viral clearance 65. A similar DNA vaccine expressing E6/E7, GX-188E, was tested in a small uncontrolled study: complete regression and virus clearance was observed in seven out of nine women with CIN3, in association with polyfunctional CD8+ T cell responses 66.

Viral vector vaccines elicit potent cell-mediated immune responses owing to their capacity for high levels of transgene expression and natural adjuvant properties. Heterologous prime-boost viral vector regimens targeting diverse human pathogens have been shown to induce high frequencies of T cells in clinical trials while avoiding vector-specific immunity 67. The first trial of a replication-competent vaccinia virus vectored HPV vaccine, TA-HPV, was conducted 20 years ago 68. A modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vectored vaccine encoding E2, a transcriptional regulator of E6 and E7, has been tested in a phase III trial that included 1,176 female subjects with HPV-driven oncogenic and non-oncogenic intraepithelial lesions and 180 males with condylomata only 69. The vaccine was delivered directly into the affected anogenital tissues. The investigators reported elimination rates of 89% in females and 100% in males. When considering only the participants with high-grade lesions (300/1,176 women), the cure rate was 73% 69. Although this is higher than the expected spontaneous regression rate, the results should be interpreted with caution, as a control group was lacking.

Role of the cervico-vaginal microbiome in the development of cervical cancer

HrHPV infections are highly prevalent in sexually active women, yet only a small minority persist and progress to cancer. Reported risk factors for carcinogenesis include smoking, other sexually transmitted pathogens, oral contraceptive use, and socio-economic status. However, few studies have established which of these associations have a mechanistic basis and which are confounders reflecting high-risk sexual behaviour. Recent studies using next-generation sequencing to characterise the microbial communities inhabiting the vagina and cervix (the cervico-vaginal microbiome) have suggested a possible role of altered vaginal microbiota in the development of CIN and cervical cancer. The cervico-vaginal microbiome is typically of low diversity and dominated by Lactobacillus species, which are assumed to protect against pathogens by maintaining a low pH 70, 71. Vaginal dysbiosis (bacterial vaginosis [BV]), a state characterised by paucity or absence of lactobacilli, overgrowth of anaerobes, and high pH, has been implicated in the acquisition and outcome of HPV infections. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies confirmed an association between BV and CIN 72. However, causality remains uncertain, since the majority of studies were cross-sectional. A reduction in Lactobacilli, increasing vaginal microbial diversity, and dominance of Sneathia species were observed in association with progression of cervical histology from normal through to high-grade CIN 73, 74. In a longitudinal study in which women were sampled twice weekly for 16 weeks, community state types (CSTs, distinct clusters of vaginal bacterial species) were observed to influence both the incidence and the clearance rates of prevalent HPV infection 75. A low lactobacillus CST was associated with a nearly two-fold higher rate ratio of incident HPV, and HPV clearance was fastest in women with Lactobacillus gasseri-dominated CSTs.

To date, the microbial composition in the vagina and cervix of healthy women has been studied largely through parallel sequencing of the highly conserved 16s ribosomal RNA subunit genes, which indicates the abundance and diversity of bacteria but does not provide information on the functional activity of the human vaginal microbiota or the diversity of other microbes present. Direct DNA sequencing (metagenomics) has revealed not only a very high prevalence of HPV in healthy women but also a far greater diversity of HPV types than can be detected by conventional typing 76. Metatranscriptomics approaches can yield more precise information regarding function and thus identify potential targets, such as the metabolically active bacteria in dysbiotic states 77. A possible interaction between cervical microbiota diversity, histopathological diagnosis of cervical HPV lesion, and cervical cytokine expression was explored in a recent cross-sectional study of women across a spectrum of HPV disease. Expression of IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-β was increased in women with cervical cancer compared with those with low-grade CIN 74. It was hypothesised that hrHPV E2, E6, and E7 drive the production of immunosuppressive cytokines, which, in turn, increase cervical microbial diversity and proliferation of Sneathia and Fusobacterium species. Collectively, these studies highlight the need for more longitudinal data and for a combined metagenomics/metatranscriptomics approach in order to better understand the complex interplay between the cervico-vaginal microbiota, sexually transmitted pathogens, and host immune system in determining the outcome of hrHPV infections.

Looking forward and challenges to implementation

Implementation of effective cervical screening is a major medical advance of the late twentieth century, and it will remain an essential tool for cancer prevention for several decades while prophylactic HPV vaccination programmes take effect. The transition from cytology to hrHPV detection as a screening tool has the potential to improve the effectiveness of screening at longer intervals and to increase coverage by enabling self-testing in the community or even at home. Stratification according to age and HR genotype, with fast-tracking of HPV-16-positive cases to colposcopy and treatment could reduce unnecessary referrals and healthcare costs in high-income countries and also facilitate the allocation of limited resources in LMICs. The opportunities available to LMICs through technological innovations in screening and preventive treatment will be missed unless innovative approaches to implementation are adopted. These include “screen and treat” protocols that embed screening by VIA or HPV tests in existing primary healthcare systems, scaling up training of healthcare workers to enable provision of treatment in a greater range of settings than specialised cancer services, and use of smartphone technology for tracking, recalls, and staff training 7880. The use of a low-cost ultra-portable tampon-based digital colposcope has been proposed as a novel approach to increase access to screening at the community level and also as a tool for virtual training 81. Collectively, these efforts could have significant health and socio-economic benefits.

Although the development of specific antiviral agents is slow, alternatives to surgical excision or ablation of CIN such as therapeutic DNA vaccines are on the horizon. With the application of potent viral vector vaccine technologies, we anticipate improvements in the clinical efficacy of these approaches. As our understanding of the microbial and mucosal immune states that lead to persistent hrHPV infection grows, we may identify new agents that can be used to manipulate the local microenvironment for therapeutic benefit.


[version 1; referees: 3 approved]

Funding Statement

Lucy Dorrell has received financial support from Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre.


Editorial Note on the Review Process

F1000 Faculty Reviews are commissioned from members of the prestigious F1000 Faculty and are edited as a service to readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, the referees provide input before publication and only the final, revised version is published. The referees who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations but without their reports on earlier versions (any comments will already have been addressed in the published version).

The referees who approved this article are:

  • Sarah Fidler, St Mary's NHS Trust and Imperial College, London, UK
    No competing interests were disclosed.
  • Yin Ling Woo, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    No competing interests were disclosed.
  • Marc Arbyn, Unit of Cancer Epidemiology/Belgian Cancer Centre, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium
    No competing interests were disclosed.


1. Schache AG, Powell NG, Cuschieri KS, et al. : HPV-Related Oropharynx Cancer in the United Kingdom: An Evolution in the Understanding of Disease Etiology. Cancer Res. 2016;76(22):6598–6606. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0633 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Hellner K, Munger K.: Human papillomaviruses as therapeutic targets in human cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(13):1785–94. 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.2186 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Arbyn M, de Sanjose S, Saraiya M, et al. : EUROGIN 2011 roadmap on prevention and treatment of HPV-related disease. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(9):1969–82. 10.1002/ijc.27650 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Plummer M, de Martel C, Vignat J, et al. : Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2012: a synthetic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(9):e609–16. 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30143-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Bruni L, Diaz M, Barrionuevo-Rosas L, et al. : Global estimates of human papillomavirus vaccination coverage by region and income level: a pooled analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(7):e453–63. 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30099-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
6. Williamson AL.: The Interaction between Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Human Papillomaviruses in Heterosexuals in Africa. J Clin Med. 2015;4(4):579–92. 10.3390/jcm4040579 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Tiggelaar SM, Lin MJ, Viscidi RP, et al. : Age-specific human papillomavirus antibody and deoxyribonucleic acid prevalence: a global review. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50(2):110–31. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.10.010 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Mesher D, Panwar K, Thomas SL, et al. : Continuing reductions in HPV 16/18 in a population with high coverage of bivalent HPV vaccination in England: an ongoing cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(2):e009915. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009915 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
9. af Geijersstam V, Eklund C, Wang Z, et al. : A survey of seroprevalence of human papillomavirus types 16, 18 and 33 among children. Int J Cancer. 1999;80(4):489–93. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990209)80:4<489::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO;2-9 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Syrjanen S.: Current concepts on human papillomavirus infections in children. APMIS. 2010;118(6–7):494–509. 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02620.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Alemany L, Cubilla A, Halec G, et al. : Role of Human Papillomavirus in Penile Carcinomas Worldwide. Eur Urol. 2016;69(5):953–61. 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.007 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Arbyn M, Bergeron C, Klinkhamer P, et al. : Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(1):167–77. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000296488.85807.b3 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Zaridze D, et al. : Preventable fractions of cervical cancer via effective screening in six Baltic, central, and eastern European countries 2017–40: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(10):1445–52. 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30275-3 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
14. Bloom D, Cafiero E, Jané-Llopis E, et al. : The Global Economic Burden of Noncommunicable Diseases.Geneva;2011. Reference Source
15. Wentzensen N, Arbyn M, Berkhof J, et al. : Eurogin 2016 Roadmap: How HPV knowledge is changing screening practice. Int J Cancer. 2016. 10.1002/ijc.30579 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, et al. : Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine. 2012;30 Suppl 5:F88–99. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Rijkaart DC, Berkhof J, van Kemenade FJ, et al. : HPV DNA testing in population-based cervical screening (VUSA-Screen study): results and implications. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(5):975–81. 10.1038/bjc.2011.581 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, et al. : Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9916):524–32. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
19. C Kitchener H, Canfell K, Gilham C, et al. : The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18(23):1–196. 10.3310/hta18230 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
20. Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, et al. : HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1385–94. 10.1056/NEJMoa0808516 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
21. Toliman P, Badman SG, Gabuzzi J, et al. : Field Evaluation of Xpert HPV Point-of-Care Test for Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infection by Use of Self-Collected Vaginal and Clinician-Collected Cervical Specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(7):1734–7. 10.1128/JCM.00529-16 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
22. Verdoodt F, Jentschke M, Hillemanns P, et al. : Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(16):2375–85. 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.006 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
23. Arbyn M, Verdoodt F, Snijders PJ, et al. : Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):172–83. 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70570-9 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Arrossi S, Thouyaret L, Herrero R, et al. : Effect of self-collection of HPV DNA offered by community health workers at home visits on uptake of screening for cervical cancer (the EMA study): a population-based cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(2):e85–94. 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70354-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Untiet S, Vassilakos P, McCarey C, et al. : HPV self-sampling as primary screening test in sub-Saharan Africa: implication for a triaging strategy. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(8):1911–7. 10.1002/ijc.28834 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Fokom-Domgue J, Combescure C, Fokom-Defo V, et al. : Performance of alternative strategies for primary cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015;351:h3084. 10.1136/bmj.h3084 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
27. Shi JF, Canfell K, Lew JB, et al. : Evaluation of primary HPV-DNA testing in relation to visual inspection methods for cervical cancer screening in rural China: an epidemiologic and cost-effectiveness modelling study. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:239. 10.1186/1471-2407-11-239 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Shastri SS, Mittra I, Mishra GA, et al. : Effect of VIA screening by primary health workers: randomized controlled study in Mumbai, India. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(3):dju009. 10.1093/jnci/dju009 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
29. Pathak N, Dodds J, Zamora J, et al. : Accuracy of urinary human papillomavirus testing for presence of cervical HPV: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g5264. 10.1136/bmj.g5264 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
30. Piyathilake CJ, Badiga S, Chambers MM, et al. : Accuracy of urinary human papillomavirus testing for the presence of cervical human papillomaviruses and higher grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer. 2016;122(18):2836–44. 10.1002/cncr.30123 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Moscicki AB, Shiboski S, Hills NK, et al. : Regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in young women. Lancet. 2004;364(9446):1678–83. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17354-6 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Gariglio P, Gutiérrez J, Cortés E, et al. : The role of retinoid deficiency and estrogens as cofactors in cervical cancer. Arch Med Res. 2009;40(6):449–65. 10.1016/j.arcmed.2009.08.002 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Doorbar J, Quint W, Banks L, et al. : The biology and life-cycle of human papillomaviruses. Vaccine. 2012;30 Suppl 5:F55–70. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.083 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Winer RL, Xi LF, Shen Z, et al. : Viral load and short-term natural history of type-specific oncogenic human papillomavirus infections in a high-risk cohort of midadult women. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(8):1889–98. 10.1002/ijc.28509 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
35. Fu TC, Fu Xi L, Hulbert A, et al. : Short-term natural history of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in mid-adult women sampled monthly. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(10):2432–42. 10.1002/ijc.29602 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
36. van der Weele P, van Logchem E, Wolffs P, et al. : Correlation between viral load, multiplicity of infection, and persistence of HPV16 and HPV18 infection in a Dutch cohort of young women. J Clin Virol. 2016;83:6–11. 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.07.020 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
37. Carcopino X, Henry M, Mancini J, et al. : Two years outcome of women infected with high risk HPV having normal colposcopy following low-grade or equivocal cytological abnormalities: are HPV16 and 18 viral load clinically useful predictive markers? J Med Virol. 2012;84(6):964–72. 10.1002/jmv.23276 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Trevisan A, Schlecht NF, Ramanakumar AV, et al. : Human papillomavirus type 16 viral load measurement as a predictor of infection clearance. J Gen Virol. 2013;94(Pt 8):1850–7. 10.1099/vir.0.051722-0 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Marks M, Gravitt PE, Utaipat U, et al. : Kinetics of DNA load predict HPV 16 viral clearance. J Clin Virol. 2011;51(1):44–9. 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.01.011 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Senkomago V, Backes DM, Hudgens MG, et al. : Higher HPV16 and HPV18 Penile Viral Loads Are Associated With Decreased Human Papillomavirus Clearance in Uncircumcised Kenyan Men. Sex Transm Dis. 2016;43(9):572–8. 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000500 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
41. Wieland U, Hellmich M, Wetendorf J, et al. : Smoking and anal high-risk human papillomavirus DNA loads in HIV-positive men who have sex with men. Int J Med Microbiol. 2015;305(7):689–96. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2015.08.019 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
42. Verhoef VM, Bosgraaf RP, van Kemenade FJ, et al. : Triage by methylation-marker testing versus cytology in women who test HPV-positive on self-collected cervicovaginal specimens (PROHTECT-3): a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(3):315–22. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70019-1 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
43. Tsu V, Jerónimo J.: Saving the World's Women from Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(26):2509–11. 10.1056/NEJMp1604113 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Khalid S, Dimitriou E, Conroy R, et al. : The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity. BJOG. 2012;119(6):685–91. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03252.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Poon LC, Savvas M, Zamblera D, et al. : Large loop excision of transformation zone and cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. BJOG. 2012;119(6):692–8. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03203.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Arbyn M, et al. : Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g6192. 10.1136/bmj.g6192 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
47. Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, et al. : Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i3633. 10.1136/bmj.i3633 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Hampson L, Maranga IO, Masinde MS, et al. : A Single-Arm, Proof-Of-Concept Trial of Lopimune (Lopinavir/Ritonavir) as a Treatment for HPV-Related Pre-Invasive Cervical Disease. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147917. 10.1371/journal.pone.0147917 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Stier EA, Goldstone SE, Einstein MH, et al. : Safety and efficacy of topical cidofovir to treat high-grade perianal and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive men and women. AIDS. 2013;27(4):545–51. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835a9b16 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
50. Stern PL, van der Burg SH, Hampson IN, et al. : Therapy of human papillomavirus-related disease. Vaccine. 2012;30(Suppl 5):F71–82. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.091 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Stevanović S, Draper LM, Langhan MM, et al. : Complete regression of metastatic cervical cancer after treatment with human papillomavirus-targeted tumor-infiltrating T cells. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(14):1543–50. 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.9093 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
52. Trimble CL, Piantadosi S, Gravitt P, et al. : Spontaneous regression of high-grade cervical dysplasia: effects of human papillomavirus type and HLA phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(13):4717–23. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2599 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Farhat S, Nakagawa M, Moscicki AB.: Cell-mediated immune responses to human papillomavirus 16 E6 and E7 antigens as measured by interferon gamma enzyme-linked immunospot in women with cleared or persistent human papillomavirus infection. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(4):508–12. 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a388c4 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Woo YL, van den Hende M, Sterling JC, et al. : A prospective study on the natural course of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and the presence of HPV16 E2-, E6- and E7-specific T-cell responses. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(1):133–41. 10.1002/ijc.24804 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Trimble CL, Clark RA, Thoburn C, et al. : Human papillomavirus 16-associated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in humans excludes CD8 T cells from dysplastic epithelium. J Immunol. 2010;185(11):7107–14. 10.4049/jimmunol.1002756 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
56. Steele JC, Mann CH, Rookes S, et al. : T-cell responses to human papillomavirus type 16 among women with different grades of cervical neoplasia. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(2):248–59. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602679 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
57. Dillon S, Sasagawa T, Crawford A, et al. : Resolution of cervical dysplasia is associated with T-cell proliferative responses to human papillomavirus type 16 E2. J Gen Virol. 2007;88(Pt 3):803–13. 10.1099/vir.0.82678-0 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
58. Kim KH, Greenfield WW, Cannon MJ, et al. : CD4+ T-cell response against human papillomavirus type 16 E6 protein is associated with a favorable clinical trend. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;61(1):63–70. 10.1007/s00262-011-1092-5 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Reusser NM, Downing C, Guidry J, et al. : HPV Carcinomas in Immunocompromised Patients. J Clin Med. 2015;4(2):260–81. 10.3390/jcm4020260 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
60. Vici P, Pizzuti L, Mariani L, et al. : Targeting immune response with therapeutic vaccines in premalignant lesions and cervical cancer: hope or reality from clinical studies. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2016;15(10):1327–36. 10.1080/14760584.2016.1176533 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
61. Yang A, Jeang J, Cheng K, et al. : Current state in the development of candidate therapeutic HPV vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2016;15(8):989–1007. 10.1586/14760584.2016.1157477 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
62. Kenter GG, Welters MJ, Valentijn AR, et al. : Vaccination against HPV-16 oncoproteins for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(19):1838–47. 10.1056/NEJMoa0810097 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
63. de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Ramwadhdoebe TH, Löwik MJ, et al. : A placebo-controlled randomized HPV16 synthetic long-peptide vaccination study in women with high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;61(9):1485–92. 10.1007/s00262-012-1292-7 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
64. van Damme P, Bouillette-Marussig M, Hens A, et al. : GTL001, A Therapeutic Vaccine for Women Infected with Human Papillomavirus 16 or 18 and Normal Cervical Cytology: Results of a Phase I Clinical Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(13):3238–48. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0085 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
65. Trimble CL, Morrow MP, Kraynyak KA, et al. : Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of VGX-3100, a therapeutic synthetic DNA vaccine targeting human papillomavirus 16 and 18 E6 and E7 proteins for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10008):2078–88. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00239-1 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
66. Kim TJ, Jin HT, Hur SY, et al. : Clearance of persistent HPV infection and cervical lesion by therapeutic DNA vaccine in CIN3 patients. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5317. 10.1038/ncomms6317 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
67. Ewer KJ, Lambe T, Rollier CS, et al. : Viral vectors as vaccine platforms: from immunogenicity to impact. Curr Opin Immunol. 2016;41:47–54. 10.1016/j.coi.2016.05.014 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
68. Borysiewicz LK, Fiander A, Nimako M, et al. : A recombinant vaccinia virus encoding human papillomavirus types 16 and 18, E6 and E7 proteins as immunotherapy for cervical cancer. Lancet. 1996;347(9014):1523–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90674-1 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
69. Rosales R, López-Contreras M, Rosales C, et al. : Regression of human papillomavirus intraepithelial lesions is induced by MVA E2 therapeutic vaccine. Hum Gene Ther. 2014;25(12):1035–49. 10.1089/hum.2014.024 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
70. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, et al. : Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4680–7. 10.1073/pnas.1002611107 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
71. Smith BC, McAndrew T, Chen Z, et al. : The cervical microbiome over 7 years and a comparison of methodologies for its characterization. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40425. 10.1371/journal.pone.0040425 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
72. Gillet E, Meys JF, Verstraelen H, et al. : Association between bacterial vaginosis and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e45201. 10.1371/journal.pone.0045201 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
73. Mitra A, MacIntyre DA, Lee YS, et al. : Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia disease progression is associated with increased vaginal microbiome diversity. Sci Rep. 2015;5(5): 16865. 10.1038/srep16865 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
74. Audirac-Chalifour A, Torres-Poveda K, Bahena-Román M, et al. : Cervical Microbiome and Cytokine Profile at Various Stages of Cervical Cancer: A Pilot Study. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153274. 10.1371/journal.pone.0153274 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
75. Brotman RM, Shardell MD, Gajer P, et al. : Interplay between the temporal dynamics of the vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus detection. J Infect Dis. 2014;210(11):1723–33. 10.1093/infdis/jiu330 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
76. Ma Y, Madupu R, Karaoz U, et al. : Human papillomavirus community in healthy persons, defined by metagenomics analysis of human microbiome project shotgun sequencing data sets. J Virol. 2014;88(9):4786–97. 10.1128/JVI.00093-14 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
77. Twin J, Bradshaw CS, Garland SM, et al. : The potential of metatranscriptomics for identifying screening targets for bacterial vaginosis. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e76892. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076892 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
78. Pimple S, Mishra G, Shastri S.: Global strategies for cervical cancer prevention. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28(1):4–10. 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000241 [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
79. Campbell C, Kafwafwa S, Brown H, et al. : Use of thermo-coagulation as an alternative treatment modality in a 'screen-and-treat' programme of cervical screening in rural Malawi. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(4):908–15. 10.1002/ijc.30101 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
80. Asgary R, Adongo PB, Nwameme A, et al. : mHealth to Train Community Health Nurses in Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid for Cervical Cancer Screening in Ghana. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016;20(3):239–42. 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000207 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation
81. Lam CT, Krieger MS, Gallagher JE, et al. : Design of a Novel Low Cost Point of Care Tampon (POCkeT) Colposcope for Use in Resource Limited Settings. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0135869. 10.1371/journal.pone.0135869 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Recommendation

Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd