Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of oncotargetLink to Publisher's site
Oncotarget. 2017 January 10; 8(2): 2485–2500.
Published online 2016 October 1. doi:  10.18632/oncotarget.12387
PMCID: PMC5356818

Definition and characterization of novel HLA-*A02-restricted CD8+ T cell epitopes derived from JCV polyomavirus with clinical relevance


Human JC and BK polyomaviruses (JCV/BKV) can establish a latent infection without any clinical symptoms in healthy individuals. In immunocompromised hosts infection or reactivation of JCV and BKV can cause lethal progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and hemorrhagic cystitis, respectively. Vaccination with JCV/BKV derived antigen epitope peptides or adoptive transfer of virus-specific T cells would constitute an elegant approach to clear virus-infected cells. Furthermore, donor leukocyte infusion (DLI) is another therapeutic approach which could be helpful for patients with JCV/BKV infections.

So far, only few immunodominant T cell epitopes of JCV and BKV have been described and therefore is a fervent need for the definition of novel epitopes. In this study, we identified novel T cell epitopes by screening libraries of overlapping peptides derived from the major capsid protein VP1 of JCV. Virus like particles (VLPs) were used to confirm naturally processing. Two human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02-restricted epitopes were characterized by fine mapping with overlapping peptides and nonamer peptide sequences were identified. Cytokine release profile of the epitope-specific T cells was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays and by flow cytometry. We demonstrated that T cell responses were of polyfunctional nature with the potential of epitope-specific killing and cross-reactivity between JCV and BKV. These novel epitopes might constitute a new potential tool to design effective diagnostic and therapeutic approaches against both polyomaviruses.

Keywords: JCV, T cell epitopes, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, virus like particles, immunotherapy


JC and BK polyomaviruses (JCV/BKV) are double stranded DNA viruses which can reactivate in the immunocompromised host and cause severe if not even lethal disease [1, 2].

Reactivation of JCV may result in a fatal central nervous system disease called progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). PML commonly occurs in patients with HIV infection (80%), and less frequently in patients with hematologic malignancies (13%) or organ transplant patients (5%) [36]. BKV is the causative agent of hemorrhagic cystitis and shares 75% identity of the genome with JCV. The major capsid protein VP1 is considered to be among the most immunogenic proteins of polyomaviruses [7]. The sequences of VP1 proteins derived from JCV/BKV are 78% identical.

Two immunodominant human leukocyte antigens (HLA)-A*0201-restricted epitopes derived from VP1-protein have been characterized in PML patients (JCV-VP1-p36-44 SITEVECFL and JCV-VP1-p100-108 ILMWEAVTL). Interestingly, cross-reactivity of T cells towards homologous epitopes of BKV VP1 (BKV-VP1-p44-52 AITEVECFL and BKV-VP1-p108-116 LLMWEAVTV) was described [79]. The cross-reactivity was demonstrated in-terms of cross-killing experiments and identification of epitopes derived from both viruses by corresponding multimers [710]. Therefore it is highly likely that a successful T cell therapy against JCV infection is also effective against BKV infection.

However, due to the inadequate availability of effective anti-viral drugs, the treatment of PML is largely dependent on the restoration of the immune system of the host. Adoptive T cell transfer is one method which has been practiced since 1990s for effective reconstitution of the immune system. Adoptive immunotherapy with Epstein-Barr virus- (EBV) [11, 12], cytomegalovirus- (CMV) [1315], adenovirus- [16, 17] and JCV-specific [18] peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)/T cells have shown successful clinic results. During antigen-specific T cell therapy, presence of allo-reactive T cells can have detrimental effects in patients due to graft-versus-host disease. In this context, it is now possible to select pure virus-specific T cells by their ability to secrete cytokines [1921], by major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-multimers [22, 23] and recombinant T cell receptor technology. However, in the case of JCV, the repertoire of immunodominant antigens or T cell epitopes is very limited. Therefore, there is a fervent need to enrich this armamentarium with further T cell epitopes derived from BKV/JCV. This could also enrich the options to use virus-specific donor leukocyte infusion (DLI) for patients with JCV/BKV reactivation.

In this study, we aimed at mapping the CD8+ T cell epitopes by using overlapping pentadecamer peptides derived from the VP1-protein. Furthermore, we used virus like particles (VLPs) derived from VP1-protein of JCV. Due to structural and immunological similarities with the natural virus, VLPs served as an important tool for the confirmation of natural processing of identified T cell specificities. We have identified several novel T cell specificities, out of which two HLA-A*02 T cell epitopes were characterized in healthy donors.


JCV VP1-specific CD8+ T cell responses in healthy donors

To measure JCV-specific T cell responses towards the VP1-protein of JCV, IFN-γ ELISPOT assays were performed using a total of 86 VP1-spanning overlapping pentadecamer peptides (OP). In order to expand CD8+ T cells, mixed lymphocyte peptide culture (MLPC) assays were performed with magnetically sorted CD8+ T cells as responders and irradiated CD8- PBMCs as stimulators. Antigen-specific responses were characterized by the stimulation index (S.I). and responses were considered positive if S.I. was equal or more than two.

We observed variable CD8+ T cell responses in the peripheral blood from healthy donors when cells were stimulated with individual overlapping peptides. Data of three different donors are illustrated in Figure Figure1.1. While some donors did not respond to any peptide (Figure (Figure1A,1A, donor 1), others showed IFN-γ release in response to most of the individual peptides (Figure (Figure1A,1A, donor 3). Few healthy donors even generated strong responses to selected peptides (Figure (Figure1A,1A, donor 2).

Figure 1
JCV-specific T cell responses of healthy donors

Moreover, we also measured frequencies of VP1-protein-specific responses by using a VP1-peptide pool in 36 HLA-A*02-positive donors after MLPC in IFN-γ ELISPOT (Figure (Figure1B).1B). T2 cells, expressing the allele HLA-A*02 on their cell surface, were used as stimulators, therefore only HLA-A*02-specific T cell responses could be observed. Around 44% of the healthy donors were tested positive. The results demonstrate the range of JCV-specific T cell responses.

Identification of naturally processed overlapping pentadecamer peptides

In order to identify naturally processed peptides, JCV VP1-derived VLPs were used as a primary stimulus followed by VP1 overlapping peptide stimulation in MLPC. Additionally, T2 cells served as antigen presenting cells (APCs) in ELISPOT assays which confirmed the HLA-A*02 restriction of identified potential peptides. A matrix format with the 86 overlapping peptides in a horizontal and vertical grid was used to further reduce the number of cells in each experimental setting. To this end, 19 matrix pools (MP) were generated with each individual peptide contained in two different MP (Figure (Figure2A2A and and2B).2B). VP1-protein derived from JCV produced in self-assemble into stable VLPs [24]. In this study, after MLPC with VLPs and subsequent stimulation using MP in the ELISPOT assays, solely naturally processed T cell specificities were identified. As seen in a representative example (Figure (Figure2C),2C), for one HLA-A*02-positive donor, four naturally processed peptides (OP-22, OP-29, OP-52 and OP-59) were identified. By following this protocol, several pentadecamer peptides were identified in 12 tested healthy donors (Table (Table1).1). 31 healthy donors were screened with the identified immunogenic pentadecamer peptides. The frequency of responses among the tested healthy donors varied for the different pentadecamer peptides. Immune responses against six of the tested pentadecamer peptides seen in less than 10 % of tested healthy donors whereas immune responses against two other pentadecamer peptides were observed in around 15 % of the tested healthy donors. Responses against the two pentadecamer peptides OP-29 and OP-72 were observed in more than 30% of the 31 tested HLA-A*02-positive donors and thus are considered as immunodominant T cell specificities (Figure (Figure3A).3A). Peptide epitopes which are common represent ideal possible candidates for the development of adoptive T cell therapy approaches for a broader range of patients. Therefore, we focused on these two peptides to further identify the ideal epitope and to characterize the epitope-specific T cells. The newly identified immunodominant T cell epitopes were subsequently confirmed by using neighboring peptides leading to the position of the epitope present within the respective pentadecamer peptide (Figure (Figure3B).3B). Stimulation was performed by using neighboring peptides of OP-29 (OP-27 to OP-31) and OP-72 (OP-70 to OP-73). For example, strong responses to OP-72 but not to the other neighboring peptides (OP-70, OP-71 or OP-73), indicate that the actual epitope is present only in OP-72 (Figure (Figure3B3B).

Figure 2
Strategy for the identification of naturally processed pentadecamer peptides
Table 1
Naturally processed overlapping pentadecamer peptides of JCV-VP1 identified by HLA-A*02 positive healthy donors
Figure 3
Identification of immunodominant pentadecamer peptides

Fine mapping of identified HLA-A*02 restricted T cell specificities

In order to identify HLA-A*02-restricted T cell epitopes, a total of seven nonamer peptides with an overlap of eight amino acids were synthesized from each immunodominant T cell specificity (OP-29 and OP-72) (Figure 4A, 4B). MLPC and ELISPOT assays were performed using T2 cells as APCs with each individual peptide. As it is displayed in Figure 4E-4H for both T cell specificties one immunodominant peptide turned out to be the CD8+ T cell determinants that stimulate secretion of IFN-γ. The nonamer peptide of OP-29 is JCV-VP1-p117 (Figure 4C, 4E, 4G) and JCV-VP1-p288 for OP-72 (Figure 4D, 4F, 4H).

Figure 4
Fine mapping analysis of immunodominant pentadecamer peptides using IFN-γ ELISPOT assays and cytotoxicity assays

To select an epitope as a potent vaccine target, killing activity of T cells towards cellular targets presenting antigenic peptides should also be considered. Therefore, we performed cytotoxicity assays and observed high killing responses after stimulation with the peptides JCV-p117 and JCV-p288, respectively. (Figure 4C, 4D).

In the process of T cell epitope identification, VLP-elicited CD8+ T cells were restimulated with newly identified T cell determinants (JCV-p117 and JCV-p288). As the T cells showed functional reactivity, we concluded that both the nonamer peptides JCV-p117 and JCV-p288 were naturally processed and presented by the HLA-A*02 allele.

CD8+ T cells targeting novel, naturally processed determinants secrete different cytokines

We evaluated whether CD8+ T cells, sensitized towards novel epitopes, are capable to secrete IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 cytokines upon restimulation. Functional CD8+ T cells were differentiated into naïve (TN; CD45RA+, CCR7+), effector memory (TEM; CD45RA-, CCR7-) and effector memory RA+/effector (TE/EMRA; CD45RA+, CCR7-) populations based on their expression of the cell surface markers CCR7 and CD45RA [25].

MLPC assays were performed for one week. Afterwards restimulation was performed for six hours in the presence of Brefeldin A followed by intracellular cytokine staining. Un-stimulated CD8+ T cells were used as negative control. IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 secreting CD8+ T cells were analyzed in the T cell subpopulations by flow cytometry in four different donors (Figure (Figure5).5). When compared to the negative control, CD8+ T cells stimulated with peptides JCV-p117 and JCV-p288 showed higher expression of all three cytokines (Figure (Figure5).5). In all tested donors, predominantly the effector memory T cell (TEM) subpopulation, CD45RA- (antigen sensitized T cells) and CCR7- (memory population), secreted type-1 cytokines (Figure (Figure5).5). Figure Figure66 showed the relative percentages for each subpopulation of CD8+ T cells and for each cytokine. The majority of the IFN-γ and TNF-α secreting population was double positive (Figure (Figure5),5), what is a characteristic of polyfunctional T cells. Polyfunctional T cell responses are considered to be crucial in effective infection control and positive outcomes in clinical settings.

Figure 5
Multifunctional JCV-specific CD8+ T cells: The ability of epitope-specific CD8+ T cells to secrete the cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 after stimulation with peptides was evaluated by intracellular flow cytometry staining
Figure 6
Epitope-specific effector memory CD8+ T cells show a dominant T cell response compared to other cell-population based on their cytokine profile: Bar graphs represent percentage of each subpopulation secreting IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 in positive ...

CD8+ T cells targeting novel JCV epitopes are cross-reactive against JCV and BKV species

To confirm cross-reactivity against JCV and BKV, BKV sequences homologous to the JCV epitopes p117 and p288 were synthesized. While JCV-p288 and the corresponding BKV sequence (BKV-p296) were identical, JCV-p117 and BKV sequence (BKV-p125) differed at certain crucial positions like position 2 and 9, which are considered as the anchor positions for peptide capturing of the HLA-A*02 allele (Figure (Figure7A7A).

Figure 7
JCV-specific CD8+ T cells are cross-reactive towards VP1 protein VLPs derived from both JCV and BKV

In functional assays, VLPs (both JCV and BKV derived) were used to prime CD8+ T cells in a criss-cross manner. IFN-γ release was measured by ELISPOT after subsequent restimulation with peptides derived from both, JCV or BKV, respectively (Figure (Figure7B).7B). The BKV-p125 peptide was not processed and did not stimulate any T cell response (Figure 7C, 7D). This might be most likely due to the absence of appropriate anchor molecules in the peptide. But both JCV epitopes and BKV-p296 were naturally processed and T cell responses in cross-reactive manner were initiated (Figure 7C, 7D).


In this study, we characterized CD8+ T cell immune responses to the VP1-protein derived from JCV which is considered as one of most immunogenic proteins of the JCV [26, 27] as well as of the BKV [2830] proteome. VP1 represents a major capsid protein and is able to self-assemble into VLPs [31, 32], which are similar to the native virus in morphology [33] and immunology [34, 35]. Some previous studies used virus-infected cell lysates to study virus-specific T cell responses [36, 37]. Such cell lysates are easy to use and allow presenting of all the proteins of virus; however, there are issues of bio-safety and standardization. VLPs, on the other hand, can be handled safely similar to peptides and are used at a lower bio-safety level. By using VLPs in our stimulation assays, we identified several HLA-A*02 T cell epitopes which were naturally processed. Due to the variability in the magnitude of T cell immune responses by responding donors, we selected immunodominant epitopes which elicited immune responses in more than 30% of healthy donors (Figure (Figure3A).3A). By fine mapping of two immunodominant T cell specificities we found the corresponding novel T cell epitopes. They were characterized towards developing future diagnostic and vaccination approaches.

JCV-specific T cell immune responses are believed to be important in controlling viral replication and progression. In particular, CD8+ T cells are considered to be the key determinant for survival of PML patients. This is mainly due to their co-localization with JCV-infected brain cells in PML lesions and secondly because of their presence in almost 90% of PML survivors when compared to PML progressors [7, 3840]. CD4+ T cells, on the other hand play crucial role in T cell help by means of cytokines secretion and activating other immune cells. The importance of T cells has been described in the setting of PML, where brain infilterating CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell sub-populations has been demonstrated to recognize VP1-derived peptides in MS patients [41]. The prevalence of circulating polyomavirus-specific T cells is rare [42] compared to the high seroprevalence (>80%) in adult population. This is probably due to occasional replication of the virus at the sites of latency [43] and due to the absence of viremia [44] thus resulting in low numbers of memory T cells in peripheral blood. Despite their low frequency, T cells seem to be very effective in controlling viral infection in healthy individuals and in allowing recovery of PML patients with HIV infection in whom PML is not as lethal as in patients after allo-HSCT [4547]. In our study, we employed MLPC assays for efficient induction of peptide-specific responses. This allowed us to detect even low frequencies of JCV-specific T cells in healthy donors which otherwise were not detectable when using fresh, un-sensitized T cells. In this process, we focused only on CD8+ T cell responses, but not on CD4+ T cell responses. The latter has been investigated by Jelcic et al. wherein the role of JCV-specific CD4+ T cells has been described in healthy donors [26]. Another study emphasized on the association of MHC class II variants on JCV infection [48]. Additionally, T2 cells were used to confirm HLA-A*02 restriction during epitope mapping, a strategy which has been used previously for CMV [49]. Overlapping peptides have been used in T cell epitope mapping studies for several viral organisms [5052]. In our study, the use of a peptide library covering the entire JCV VP1-protein with pentadecamer peptides with an overlap of eleven amino acids ensured that the majority of potential epitopes were included. Moreover, the matrix pool approach allowed us to measure T cell responses with a limited number of immune cells (Figure (Figure22).

Furthermore, we assessed the functional capacity in terms of cytokine secretion by epitope-primed CD8+ T cells specific for JCV. We observed a low frequency of JCV/BKV specific cells which were phenotypically characterized as TEM cells (CD45RA-, CCR7-) and this is in line with previous observations [42]. The virus-specific T cell responses showed mostly the TEM phenotype with a significant release of pro-inflammatory effector cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2) upon stimulation with our candidate JCV-specific epitope peptides (Figure 6A, 6B). The production of TNF-α and IL-2 indicate the differentiation of CD8+ T cells from an effector to a memory phenotype [53, 54].

Because of the high predominance of latent JCV infection in healthy individuals, there is a high likelihood of (re)activation once the active immune system is suppressed as it is in patients after transplantation or patients suffering from certain diseases like acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Adoptive immunotherapy is one approach that seems to be effective in reconstituting the body with sufficient virus-specific immune cells. This strategy has been fairly successful in treating infections caused by CMV, EBV and adenoviruses in immunocompromised patients. However, only a single case study reported on successful application of JCV-specific T cells to a PML patient [18]. This might be most probably due to late diagnosis of PML in immunosuppressed patients. Knowledge of particular immunodominant T cell epitopes can be very useful to prepare peptide vaccines [1, 27] or designer T cells or a bank of HLA-matched T cell lines that can be readily administered at the time of diagnosis [5557]. Our group had shown that GMP-compliant preparation of virus-specific T cells can also be achieved using advanced streptamer technology [23]. Recently, other groups reported on a GMP-compliant protocol of cytokine catch analysis for CMV, EBV and adenovirues [21].

We presented two novel immunodominant HLA-A*02-restricted T cell epitopes which, most importantly, are naturally processed. Although, our study is limited to one prominent allele expressed in about 50 % of the Caucasian population, this approach can be utilized to characterize more HLA-dependent epitopes restricted on other HLA types.

While we only investigated samples from healthy blood donors, however, these results provide a good experimental basis for the enrichment of JCV or BKV-specific epitopes across HLA-allele for immunotherapeutic approaches including peptide vaccination and monitoring JCV or BKV-specific T cell responses due to their immunodominance in healthy donors.

Furthermore, with the aim of virus-specific donor leukocyte infusion (DLI), testing of donor lymphocytes towards specificity for particular JCV/BKV epitopes is completely sufficient. Further testing of APCs from patients with a detectable viral load in the APCs will be almost impossible from patient with acute infection with BKV/JCV. Isolation of PBMC from blood of these patients will not result in asservation of such virus infected APCs. This would rather require a screening procedure of the urine bladder or epithelial cells. This was assumed as not to be ethical.

In summary, we defined novel JCV/BKV derived CD8+ T cell epitopes to stimulate or select T cells ex vivo for adoptive transfer of virus-specific T cells with the aim of clearance of the viral load. This will broaden the therapeutical option for patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation suffering from polyomavirus reactivation. A potential strategy for the translation application of our novel epitopes into clinical practice is to combine them with already described epitopes to stimulate DLI ex vivo and to use cytokine-secretion or/and streptamer technologies to produce multi-epitope DLI. This would be an ideal strategy to avoid escape mechanisms and to cover majority of the patient population.


Blood samples from healthy donors

Buffy coats from healthy donor blood samples were obtained from the blood bank of the Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Cell Therapy (IKTZ, Heidelberg, Germany) after receiving informed consent. Peripheral blood from healthy donors was obtained from Department of Transplantation Immunology. PBMCs were separated from peripheral blood samples by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-hypaque solution (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany). PBMCs were cryopreserved in 90% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco®, Grand Island, NY, USA) plus 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and stored in liquid nitrogen until use.


Typing for HLA-A*02 was performed by staining PBMCs with an anti-HLA-A*02 antibody (Clone BB7.2, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) for 20 min at 4°C, in the dark. Flow cytometric acquisition was performed with a FACS LSR II cytometer and data were analyzed using BD FACSDiva software (Becton Dickinson, New York, NY, USA).

Peptides and proteins

Pentadecamer peptides (OP-1 to OP-86) with an overlap of eleven amino acids covering the entire VP1-protein of JCV as well as nonamer peptides were synthesized and provided by peptides&elephants GmbH (Postdam, Germany). Overlapping pentadecamer peptides were arranged in a horizontal and vertical way to prepare a matrix encompassing 19 peptide matrix pools (MP 1 to 19), thereby, each peptide was present in two different peptide matrix pools.

VP1 VLPs derived from JCV and BKV were produced in yeast and prepared as previously described [24]. BKV and JCV VP1 VLPs were used to confirm the natural processing of antigens.

Mixed lymphocyte peptide cultures (MLPC)

MLPC were performed using fresh or thawed PBMCs as described earlier with some modifications [58]. Briefly, CD8+ T lymphocytes were positively isolated from PBMCs using magnetic cell separation (MACS) CD8 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany). CD8- PBMCs were irradiated with 30 Gy and loaded at 37°C either with JCV/BKV nonamer/pentadecamer peptides (1 μg/ml), peptide pools (1 μg/ml) or VLPs (10 μg/ml). CD8+ and CD8- PBMCs (ratio 1:4) were then co-cultured in culture medium supplemented with 2.5 ng/ml Interleukin-2 (IL-2, Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and 20 ng/ml IL-7 (Miltenyi Biotec) for one week.

Flow cytometry/Intracellular cytokine staining

Intracellular staining for the cytokines Interferon-γ (IFN-γ), Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and IL-2 was performed as originally mentioned by Jung et al. [59]. Briefly, cells after one week MLPC were restimulated with appropriate antigens in the presence of Brefeldin A for six hours (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Cells were harvested for live-dead NEAR (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) and surface marker staining followed by fixation using paraformaldehyde (PFA, Sigma Aldrich). For surface marker staining the following antibodies were used: CD3 Alexa fluor700 (Biolegend, Fell, Germany), CD8 Peridinin chlorophyll (PerCP, Biolegend), CD197 (CCR7) phycoerythrin Cy7 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) and CD45RA fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). After permeabilization cells were blocked by FcR blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotec) then stained for intracellular cytokines using anti-IFN-γ PE, anti-TNF-α Pacific Blue and anti-IL-2 AmCyan antibodies (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). Samples were measured with the flow cytometer BD LSR II and analyzed using the BD FACSDiva analysis software (BD Biosciences).

Interferon γ enzyme linked immunospot assays (IFN-γ ELISPOT)

IFN-γ ELISPOT assays were performed as described earlier [58]. Briefly, after pre-wet activation using 35% ethanol ELISPOT plates (Multiscreen IP 96-well plates, Millipore, Massachusetts, USA) were coated with anti–human IFN-γ antibody (Mabtech, Nacka Strand, Sweden). The next day, plates were blocked and loaded with APCs (5 x104 cells/well) and responder cells (5 x104 cells/well). Usually T2 cells (HLA-A*02-positive cells) incubated with the respective peptides served as APCs [60]. T2 cells without any peptides were used as negative control. Stimulation with staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) was used as positive control.

After overnight incubation, washing and incubation with secondary antibody (IFN-γ detection antibody, Mabtech), plates were developed using horseradish peroxidase (HRP) substrate (Becton Dickinson). Visible spots were automatically counted and analyzed using an ELISPOT reader (CTL-Europe GmbH, Bonn, Germany).

Cells were evaluated in triplicates in each ELISPOT assay and mean and standard deviations were calculated.

IFN-γ secretion of T cells was counted in spot forming units (SFU). Positivity in the assay was defined as 2-fold beyond background SFU.

In some experiments antigen-specific responses were characterized by a stimulation index (S.I.) for comparability of different donors in variable experiments. The S.I. represents the ratio of the number of IFN-γ secreting cells after antigen stimulation to that without stimulation (negative control). Responses were considered as positive when the S.I. was equal or above the cut-off of two.

Cytotoxicity assays

Calcein-acetoxymethyl (AM) cytotoxicity assays were performed as described elsewhere [61]. Briefly, 106/ml T2 cells (target cells) were stained with 10 μg calcein AM (Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) for 30 min at 37°C with occasional shaking. After three washes, cells were adjusted to 5 × 104/ml and 100 μl were added in V-bottom 96-well plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Roskilde, Denmark) as triplicates. Effector cells were harvested from the tissue culture plate, washed and co-cultured with target cells. Target cells with and without triton X-100 (Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) were considered as maximum and spontaneous release samples, respectively. After incubation at 37°C for 4 h supernatant were transferred into black F-bottom 96-well microplates (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) and measured using a Glomax microplate reader (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Percent specific killing (%) was calculated using the following formula as described earlier [61]: (test release – spontaneous release)/(maximum release – spontaneous release) × 100.


We want to thank Mandy Hinkelbein for excellent technical assistance.



The authors declare no conflict of interest.


Jiju Mani received a doctoral fellowship from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).


1. Mani J, Jin N, Schmitt M. Cellular immunotherapy for patients with reactivation of JC and BK polyomaviruses after transplantation. Cytotherapy. 2014;16:1325–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.04.003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Chesters PM, Heritage J, McCance DJ. Persistence of DNA sequences of BK virus and JC virus in normal human tissues and in diseased tissues. J Infect Dis. 1983;147:676–84. [PubMed]
3. Gheuens S, Pierone G, Peeters P, Koralnik IJ. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in individuals with minimal or occult immunosuppression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:247–54. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.187666. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Langer-Gould A, Atlas SW, Green AJ, Bollen AW, Pelletier D. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in a patient treated with natalizumab. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:375–81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051847. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Molloy ES, Calabrese LH. Therapy: Targeted but not trouble-free: efalizumab and PML. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2009;5:418–9. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.142. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Schmidt-Hieber M, Schwender J, Heinz WJ, Zabelina T, Kuhl JS, Mousset S, Schuttrumpf S, Junghanss C, Silling G, Basara N, Neuburger S, Thiel E, Blau IW. Viral encephalitis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a rare complication with distinct characteristics of different causative agents. Haematologica. 2011;96:142–9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.029876. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Koralnik IJ, RA Du Pasquier, Kuroda MJ, Schmitz JE, Dang X, Zheng Y, Lifton M, Letvin NL. Association of prolonged survival in HLA-A2+ progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy patients with a CTL response specific for a commonly recognized JC virus epitope. J Immunol. 2002;168:499–504. [PubMed]
8. Krymskaya L, Sharma MC, Martinez J, Haq W, Huang EC, Limaye AP, Diamond DJ, Lacey SF. Cross-reactivity of T lymphocytes recognizing a human cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope within BK and JC virus VP1 polypeptides. J Virol. 2005;79:11170–8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.17.11170-11178.2005. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Sharma MC, Zhou W, Martinez J, Krymskaya L, Srivastava T, Haq W, Diamond DJ, Lacey SF. Cross-reactive CTL recognizing two HLA-A*02-restricted epitopes within the BK virus and JC virus VP1 polypeptides are frequent in immunocompetent individuals. Virology. 2006;350:128–36. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.02.040. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. RA Du Pasquier, Kuroda MJ, Schmitz JE, Zheng Y, Martin K, Peyerl FW, Lifton M, Gorgone D, Autissier P, Letvin NL, Koralnik IJ. Low frequency of cytotoxic T lymphocytes against the novel HLA-A*0201-restricted JC virus epitope VP1(p36) in patients with proven or possible progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. J Virol. 2003;77:11918–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Heslop HE, Ng CY, Li C, Smith CA, Loftin SK, Krance RA, Brenner MK, Rooney CM. Long-term restoration of immunity against Epstein-Barr virus infection by adoptive transfer of gene-modified virus-specific T lymphocytes. Nat Med. 1996;2:551–5. [PubMed]
12. Rooney CM, Smith CA, Ng CY, Loftin S, Li C, Krance RA, Brenner MK, Heslop HE. Use of gene-modified virus-specific T lymphocytes to control Epstein-Barr-virus-related lymphoproliferation. Lancet. 1995;345:9–13. [PubMed]
13. Walter EA, Greenberg PD, Gilbert MJ, Finch RJ, Watanabe KS, Thomas ED, Riddell SR. Reconstitution of cellular immunity against cytomegalovirus in recipients of allogeneic bone marrow by transfer of T-cell clones from the donor. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1038–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199510193331603. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Perruccio K, Tosti A, Burchielli E, Topini F, Ruggeri L, Carotti A, Capanni M, Urbani E, Mancusi A, Aversa F, Martelli MF, Romani L, Velardi A. Transferring functional immune responses to pathogens after haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation. Blood. 2005;106:4397–406. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-1775. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Einsele H, Roosnek E, Rufer N, Sinzger C, Riegler S, Loffler J, Grigoleit U, Moris A, Rammensee HG, Kanz L, Kleihauer A, Frank F, Jahn G, et al. Infusion of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cells for the treatment of CMV infection not responding to antiviral chemotherapy. Blood. 2002;99:3916–22. [PubMed]
16. Leen AM, Myers GD, Sili U, Huls MH, Weiss H, Leung KS, Carrum G, Krance RA, Chang CC, Molldrem JJ, Gee AP, Brenner MK, Heslop HE, et al. Monoculture-derived T lymphocytes specific for multiple viruses expand and produce clinically relevant effects in immunocompromised individuals. Nat Med. 2006;12:1160–6. doi: 10.1038/nm1475. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Leen AM, Christin A, Myers GD, Liu H, Cruz CR, Hanley PJ, Kennedy-Nasser AA, Leung KS, Gee AP, Krance RA, Brenner MK, Heslop HE, Rooney CM, et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte therapy with donor T cells prevents and treats adenovirus and Epstein-Barr virus infections after haploidentical and matched unrelated stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2009;114:4283–92. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-232454. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Balduzzi A, Lucchini G, Hirsch HH, Basso S, Cioni M, Rovelli A, Zincone A, Grimaldi M, Corti P, Bonanomi S, Biondi A, Locatelli F, Biagi E, et al. Polyomavirus JC-targeted T-cell therapy for progressive multiple leukoencephalopathy in a hematopoietic cell transplantation recipient. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011;46:987–92. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.221. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Feuchtinger T, Opherk K, Bethge WA, Topp MS, Schuster FR, Weissinger EM, Mohty M, Or R, Maschan M, Schumm M, Hamprecht K, Handgretinger R, Lang P, et al. Adoptive transfer of pp65-specific T cells for the treatment of chemorefractory cytomegalovirus disease or reactivation after haploidentical and matched unrelated stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2010;116:4360–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-262089. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Peggs KS, Thomson K, Samuel E, Dyer G, Armoogum J, Chakraverty R, Pang K, Mackinnon S, Lowdell MW. Directly selected cytomegalovirus-reactive donor T cells confer rapid and safe systemic reconstitution of virus-specific immunity following stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:49–57. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq042. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Icheva V, Kayser S, Wolff D, Tuve S, Kyzirakos C, Bethge W, Greil J, Albert MH, Schwinger W, Nathrath M, Schumm M, Stevanovic S, Handgretinger R, et al. Adoptive transfer of epstein-barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen 1-specific t cells as treatment for EBV reactivation and lymphoproliferative disorders after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:39–48. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.8495. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Uhlin M, Okas M, Gertow J, Uzunel M, Brismar TB, Mattsson J. A novel haplo-identical adoptive CTL therapy as a treatment for EBV-associated lymphoma after stem cell transplantation. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010;59:473–7. doi: 10.1007/s00262-009-0789-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Schmitt A, Tonn T, Busch DH, Grigoleit GU, Einsele H, Odendahl M, Germeroth L, Ringhoffer M, Ringhoffer S, Wiesneth M, Greiner J, Michel D, Mertens T, et al. Adoptive transfer and selective reconstitution of streptamer-selected cytomegalovirus-specific CD8+ T cells leads to virus clearance in patients after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Transfusion. 2011;51:591–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02940.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Sasnauskas K, Bulavaite A, Hale A, Jin L, Knowles WA, Gedvilaite A, Dargeviciute A, Bartkeviciute D, Zvirbliene A, Staniulis J, Brown DW, Ulrich R. Generation of recombinant virus-like particles of human and non-human polyomaviruses in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Intervirology. 2002;45:308–17. [PubMed]
25. Willinger T, Freeman T, Hasegawa H, McMichael AJ, Callan MF. Molecular signatures distinguish human central memory from effector memory CD8 T cell subsets. J Immunol. 2005;175:5895–903. [PubMed]
26. Jelcic I, Aly L, Binder TM, Jelcic I, Bofill-Mas S, Planas R, Demina V, Eiermann TH, Weber T, Girones R, Sospedra M, Martin R. T cell epitope mapping of JC polyoma virus-encoded proteome reveals reduced T cell responses in HLA-DRB1*04: 01+ donors. J Virol. 2013;87:3393–408. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02803-12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Sospedra M, Schippling S, Yousef S, Jelcic I, Bofill-Mas S, Planas R, Stellmann JP, Demina V, Cinque P, Garcea R, Croughs T, Girones R, Martin R. Treating progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy with interleukin 7 and vaccination with JC virus capsid protein VP1. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:1588–92. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu682. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Hammer MH, Brestrich G, Andree H, Engelmann E, Rosenberger C, Tillmann H, Zwinger S, Babel N, Nickel P, Volk HD, Reinke P. HLA type-independent method to monitor polyoma BK virus-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell immunity. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:625–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01221.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Comoli P, Hirsch HH, Ginevri F. Cellular immune responses to BK virus. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2008;13:569–74. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283186b93. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Sester M, Leboeuf C, Schmidt T, Hirsch HH. The ABC of virus-specific T-cell immunity in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2015. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13684. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Chang D, Fung CY, Ou WC, Chao PC, Li SY, Wang M, Huang YL, Tzeng TY, Tsai RT. Self-assembly of the JC virus major capsid protein, VP1, expressed in insect cells. J Gen Virol. 1997;78(Pt6):1435–9. [PubMed]
32. Chen PL, Wang M, Ou WC, Lii CK, Chen LS, Chang D. Disulfide bonds stabilize JC virus capsid-like structure by protecting calcium ions from chelation. FEBS Lett. 2001;500:109–13. [PubMed]
33. Teunissen EA, de Raad M, Mastrobattista E. Production and biomedical applications of virus-like particles derived from polyomaviruses. J Control Release. 2013;172:305–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.026. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Nicol JT, Touze A, Robinot R, Arnold F, Mazzoni E, Tognon M, Coursaget P. Seroprevalence and cross-reactivity of human polyomavirus 9. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:1329–32. doi: 10.3201/eid1808.111625. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Viscidi RP, Rollison DE, Viscidi E, Clayman B, Rubalcaba E, Daniel R, Major EO, Shah KV. Serological cross-reactivities between antibodies to simian virus 40, BK virus, and JC virus assessed by virus-like-particle-based enzyme immunoassays. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003;10:278–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Drake DR, JM 3rd Moser, Hadley A, Altman JD, Maliszewski C, Butz E, Lukacher AE. Polyomavirus-infected dendritic cells induce antiviral CD8(+) T lymphocytes. J Virol. 2000;74:4093–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Li J, Melenhorst J, Hensel N, Rezvani K, Sconocchia G, Kilical Y, Hou J, Curfman B, Major E, Barrett AJ. T-cell responses to peptide fragments of the BK virus T antigen: implications for cross-reactivity of immune response to JC virus. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:2951–60. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.82094-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Koralnik IJ, RA Du Pasquier, Letvin NL. JC virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in individuals with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. J Virol. 2001;75:3483–7. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.7.3483-3487.2001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Tan CS, Broge TA, Jr, Ngo L, Gheuens S, Viscidi R, Bord E, Rosenblatt J, Wong M, Avigan D, Koralnik IJ. Immune reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated with selective control of JC virus reactivation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20:992–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.03.018. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Monaco MC, Major EO. Immune System Involvement in the Pathogenesis of JC Virus Induced PML: What is Learned from Studies of Patients with Underlying Diseases and Therapies as Risk Factors. Front Immunol. 2015;6:159. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00159. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Aly L, Yousef S, Schippling S, Jelcic I, Breiden P, Matschke J, Schulz R, Bofill-Mas S, Jones L, Demina V, Linnebank M, Ogg G, Girones R, et al. Central role of JC virus-specific CD4+ lymphocytes in progressive multi-focal leucoencephalopathy-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Brain. 2011;134:2687–702. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr206. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. van Aalderen MC, Remmerswaal EB, Heutinck KM, A ten Brinke, Pircher H, van Lier RA, ten Berge IJ. Phenotypic and functional characterization of circulating polyomavirus BK VP1-specific CD8+ T cells in healthy adults. J Virol. 2013;87:10263–72. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01540-13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Polo C, Perez JL, Mielnichuck A, Fedele CG, Niubo J, Tenorio A. Prevalence and patterns of polyomavirus urinary excretion in immunocompetent adults and children. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:640–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00882.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Koralnik IJ, Boden D, Mai VX, Lord CI, Letvin NL. JC virus DNA load in patients with and without progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Neurology. 1999;52:253–60. [PubMed]
45. Kraemer C, Evers S, Nolting T, Arendt G, Husstedt IW. Cidofovir in combination with HAART and survival in AIDS-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. J Neurol. 2008;255:526–31. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0731-z. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. RA Du Pasquier, Kuroda MJ, Zheng Y, Jean-Jacques J, Letvin NL, Koralnik IJ. A prospective study demonstrates an association between JC virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and the early control of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Brain. 2004;127:1970–8. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh215. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Marzocchetti A, Tompkins T, Clifford DB, Gandhi RT, Kesari S, Berger JR, Simpson DM, Prosperi M, De Luca A, Koralnik IJ. Determinants of survival in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Neurology. 2009;73:1551–8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c0d4a1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Sundqvist E, Buck D, Warnke C, Albrecht E, Gieger C, Khademi M, I Lima Bomfim, Fogdell-Hahn A, Link J, Alfredsson L, Sondergaard HB, Hillert J, International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics C et al. JC polyomavirus infection is strongly controlled by human leucocyte antigen class II variants. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004084. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004084. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Schalich J, Vytvytska O, Zauner W, Fischer MB, Buschle M, Aichinger G, Klade CS. Analysis of the human cytomegalovirus pp65-directed T-cell response in healthy HLA-A2-positive individuals. Biol Chem. 2008;389:551–9. [PubMed]
50. Trivedi D, Williams RY, O'Reilly RJ, Koehne G. Generation of CMV-specific T lymphocytes using protein-spanning pools of pp65-derived overlapping pentadecapeptides for adoptive immunotherapy. Blood. 2005;105:2793–801. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1433. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Homann D, Lewicki H, Brooks D, Eberlein J, Mallet-Designe V, Teyton L, Oldstone MB. Mapping and restriction of a dominant viral CD4+ T cell core epitope by both MHC class I and MHC class II. Virology. 2007;363:113–23. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.12.025. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Wu C, Zanker D, Valkenburg S, Tan B, Kedzierska K, Zou QM, Doherty PC, Chen W. Systematic identification of immunodominant CD8+ T-cell responses to influenza A virus in HLA-A2 individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:9178–83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105624108. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Slifka MK, Whitton JL. Activated and memory CD8+ T cells can be distinguished by their cytokine profiles and phenotypic markers. J Immunol. 2000;164:208–16. [PubMed]
54. Lima MA, Marzocchetti A, Autissier P, Tompkins T, Chen Y, Gordon J, Clifford DB, Gandhi RT, Venna N, Berger JR, Koralnik IJ. Frequency and phenotype of JC virus-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. J Virol. 2007;81:3361–8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01809-06. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Barker JN, Doubrovina E, Sauter C, Jaroscak JJ, Perales MA, Doubrovin M, Prockop SE, Koehne G, O'Reilly RJ. Successful treatment of EBV-associated posttransplantation lymphoma after cord blood transplantation using third-party EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Blood. 2010;116:5045–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-281873. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Leen AM, Bollard CM, Mendizabal AM, Shpall EJ, Szabolcs P, Antin JH, Kapoor N, Pai SY, Rowley SD, Kebriaei P, Dey BR, Grilley BJ, Gee AP, et al. Multicenter study of banked third-party virus-specific T cells to treat severe viral infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2013;121:5113–23. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-02-486324. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
57. Yang W, Beaudoin EL, Lu L, RA Du Pasquier, Kuroda MJ, Willemsen RA, Koralnik IJ, Junghans RP. Chimeric immune receptors (CIRs) specific to JC virus for immunotherapy in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) Int Immunol. 2007;19:1083–93. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxm076. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
58. Jin N, Malcherek G, Mani J, Zurleit R, Schmitt A, Chen B, Freund M, Ho AD, Schmitt M. Suppression of cytomegalovirus-specific CD8(+)T cells by everolimus. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:1144–50. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2013.822496. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Jung T, Schauer U, Heusser C, Neumann C, Rieger C. Detection of intracellular cytokines by flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 1993;159:197–207. [PubMed]
60. Matsumura S, Kita H, He XS, Ansari AA, Lian ZX, Van De Water J, Yamamoto K, Tsuji T, Coppel RL, Kaplan M, Gershwin ME. Comprehensive mapping of HLA-A0201-restricted CD8 T-cell epitopes on PDC-E2 in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2002;36:1125–34. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.36161. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
61. Neri S, Mariani E, Meneghetti A, Cattini L, Facchini A. Calcein-acetyoxymethyl cytotoxicity assay: standardization of a method allowing additional analyses on recovered effector cells and supernatants. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001;8:1131–5. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.8.6.1131-1135.2001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
62. Dang X, Wuthrich C, Gordon J, Sawa H, Koralnik IJ. JC virus encephalopathy is associated with a novel agnoprotein-deletion JCV variant. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035793. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC