|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Platelet-activating factor receptor (PAFR) promotes tumorigenesis, angiogenesis and metastasis. Here, we defined the PAFR as a yielding new inhibiting target to selectively enhance the sensitivity of prostate cancer (PCa) cells to radiation. The selective responding to PAFR inhibiter may be caused by the differential expression pattern of PAFR in PCa cells. In this study, we also determined PAFR as a molecular basis by which the radiation induces autophagy suppression independent of activating mTOR pathway. PAFR can bind to the autophagy-indispensable protein Beclin 1, leading to the disability in its serine phosphorylation. The PAFR antagonist Ginkgolide B (GB) can sensitize radiotherapy by disrupting the formation of PAFR/Beclin 1 complex in PC3 and LNCaP cells, which have elevated PAFR expression after radiation exposure. Most importantly, GB efficiently radiosensitized PC3 and LNCaP tumor xenografts in vivo, and significantly reduced tumor burden. Overall, our results elucidated a significant role of GB in selectively improving the outcomes of PCa receiving radiation therapy.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths and the most common cancer in men in the United States , and its morbidity is also rapidly rising in East Asian . During the PSA era, most PCa can be diagnosed at an early stage, for which radiotherapy is one of the standard treatment modalities, alone or combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) [3, 4]. Because of the side-effect of radiation, limited dose of less than 85 Gy can be delivered to prostate. However, approximately 10% to 45% PCa are radioresistant either not responding or relapsing after receiving limited dose irradiation [5–7]. This supports that an alternative to improving efficacy of radiation would be to use radiation-sensitizer not to increase radiation dose.
G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) is a large family of cell-surface proteins [8, 9]. The abnormal expression of GPCR or aberrant activation by their ligands would initiate their signaling networks and PCa progression and resistance to anti-cancer treatments. Platelet-activating factor (PAR) receptor (PAFR) is one of GPCR, which can be activated by PAR. It has been reported to promote non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progression and metastasis by initiating forward feedback loop between PAFR and STAT3 , and contributes to the malignant development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by stimulating PI3K/AKT activation . PAFR can also induce chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer through transactivating of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [12, 13]. In addition, LNCaP and PC-3 cells have been shown to produce PAF endogenously . However, the biologic roles of PAFR in PCa progression and radioresistance have not been investigated.
To test whether inhibition of PAFR enhance the sensitivity of PCa to ionizing irradiation, we chose a castration-resistant and highly metastatic (PC3) and a androgen-dependent and lowly metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma cell lines. We measured cell-killing effects of ionizing radiation in PCa cells by examining colony-forming ability (Clonogenic survival assay). PC3 cells were treated with a series of concentrations of PAFR antagonist, Ginkgolide B (GB), post sham (Ctrl) and genuine irradiation. As shown in Figure Figure1A,1A, it seems that GB did not show any suppressive activity against PC3 cells. However, it sensitized PC3 cells to irradiation (6 Gy) in manner of dose dependent, approximately reaching a maximum at 100μM of treatment. At this concentration, GB significantly enhanced cell-killing effects of radiation in both PC3 and LNCaP cells, resulting in significant decrease in surviving fraction at 6 Gy of X-ray (Figure (Figure1B1B and and1C1C).
After radiation exposure, treatment of PC3 cells with GB for 48 hours (h) resulted in significantly mroe apoptosis and less proliferation, shown by the increased apoptotic markers, cleaved poly adp-ribose-polymerase (cPARP) and activated caspase 3, and decreased proliferative marker, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (Figure (Figure2A).2A). As shown in Figure Figure2B,2B, combination therapy of radiation with GB induced more apoptosis and weakened proliferation compared to radiation monotherapy (Figure (Figure2B).2B). Consistent with these observations, there was a statistically significant increase in caspase 3 activity in cells treated with X-ray (P < 0.05), and the most increase was observed in the groups received combination therapy when compared with sham and GB treatment (P < 0.05, Figure Figure2C).2C). In addition, cell cycle assay was conducted by flow cytometry, results showed that GB reduced cells in G2/M and S stages (Figure (Figure2D).2D). It is worth to note that treatment of GB alone in the culture medium failed to induce cellular apoptotic death (Figure 2B–2D).
To additionally confirm that the GB-induced radiosensitization is specifically through PAFR inhibition, PAFR expressions before and after 6 Gy of X-ray are detected by western blot and RT-PCR analyses. Here, we confirm that PAFR is almost not expressed in unirradiated prostate cells and differentially expressed in irradiated prostate cells, showing that PAFR significantly overexpressed in X-ray exposed PC3 and LNCaP cells, but not in irradiated DU-145 and RWPE-1 (a non-oncogenic prostate epithelial cell line) (Figure (Figure3A).3A). mRNA levels of PAFR correlated with its protein levels (Figure (Figure3B).3B). As expected, GB fails to induce radiosensitization in DU145 cells because of little expression of PAFR after irradiation (Figure (Figure3C).3C). Stable PAFR overexpression makes DU145 cells (DU145-PAFR) resistant to radiation, and the effect of overexpressed PAFR mostly offseted by GB. To additionally validate the effect of GB on radiosensitization are mediated by PAFR, we stably knockdown PAFR in PC3 cells. Results in Figure Figure3D3D and and3E3E show that GB no longer induce radiosensitization in PAFR-silenced PC3 (PC3-shPAFR) cells. Moreover, Figure Figure3F3F and and3G3G show that GB don't further increase the apoptosis and reduce the proliferation of DU-145 and PC3-shPAFR caused by X-ray. At the last, we overexpress PAFR in DU145 cells, Whereas, In my opinion, the authors should use DU145 cell line to overexpress PAFR and show that makes cells resistant to radiation.
To test the hypothesis that GB can enhance the sensitivity of PCa to irradiation in vivo, the subcutaneous PC3 tumor models are used. The schemas outlining in vivo experiments are presented in Figure Figure4A4A and and4C,4C, and results can be found in Figure Figure4B4B and and4D.4D. In the first experiment, mice are randomized 5 days postinoculation and the drug treatment and/or irradiation are started immediately thereafter (Figure (Figure4A).4A). For the second experiment, mice are randomized 4 weeks postinoculation and the drug treatment and/or irradiation are the same as the first experiment (Figure (Figure4C).4C). Both Figure Figure4B4B and Figure Figure4D4D show that GB alone has no significant effect on suppression of PC3 xenografts. Irradiation alone is partially efficacious, whereas the combined treatment (X-ray plus GB) shows the most protuberant effect, significantly reducing tumor growth (vs. X-ray alone, P < 0.01).
To explore the potential mechanism of PAFR-induced radioresistance in PCa cells, we test autophagosome formation in a continuous time in scramble or PAFR shRNA stably transfected PC3 cells (PC3-shScr or PC3-shPAFR) after radiation exposure. Treatment of PC3-shPAFR cells with radiation results in a persistent increase in autophagy within 96 hours, whereas a transient rising is found in PC3-shScr cells, as shown by the LC3B protein accumulation (Figure (Figure5A5A and and5B).5B). To confirm the effects of radiation and GB on autophagosome formation in vivo, we used xenograft tumors from NOD-SCID mice mentioned in Figure Figure4B.4B. All tumors were harvested at 6-week post implantation. X-ray exposure resulted in less autophagy induction, as evidenced by an decrease in LC3B expression (Figure (Figure5C).5C). GB combined with radiation significantly promoted autophagy induction, whereas GB alone failed to do (Figure (Figure5C5C).
During serum starvation, autophagy can be induced by inhibiting the protein mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a nutrient-responsive kinase [17–19]. To further evaluate whether the activation of mTOR pathway is involved in irradiation-induced autophagy suppression, we used ATP-competitive inhibitor of mTOR, Torin 1 . PC3 cells receive either GB or Torin 1, which requires 72 hours of radiation treatment for PAFR and mTOR pathway activation. Serine phosphorylation of Beclin 1 and the following autophagy is weakly increased by Torin 1 in X-ray treated PC3, as shown by accumulation of LC3B and reduction of P62 (Figure (Figure5D).5D). Beclin-1, mammalian homolog of yeast Atg6, is required for the autophagy induction. The effectiveness of Torin 1 is confirmed by suppressed phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 and ULK1, downstream proteins of mTOR kinase. However, a significant increase of autophagy is observed in cells received treatment of both radiation and GB (Figure (Figure5D).5D). In addition, GB results in the suppression the formation of PAFR/Beclin 1 complex (Figure (Figure5E).5E). More importantly, we find that PAFR can only bind to non-phosphorylated Beclin 1 (Figure (Figure5E).5E). These results remind us that increased PAFR may impede phosphorylation of Beclin 1 via directly binding to it.
The high expression of PAFR and the corresponding ligand PAF results in the invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer and NSCLC [10, 21]. Besides, several studies have shown that PAFR antagonists can reduce tumor metastasis in vivo [10, 21–23]. In addition, the upregulation of PAFR contributes to cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer via activating PI3K and ERK pathways that lies downstream of activated PAFR . Co-treatment with Ginkgolide B and cisplatin can markedly reduce tumor growth in an in vivo model of ovarian cancer . However, it's unclear if PAFR leads to anticancer resistance in PCa. In this study, we demonstrate that PAFR inhibition can selectively enhances the sensitivity of radiotherapy in PCa cells with elevated PAFR expression after irradiation exposure. Mechanisms of PAFR-inhibition mediated sensitization to radiotherapy includes the weakness of proliferation, disruption of cell-cycle and the enhancement of radiation induced apoptosis. More importantly, our data clearly demonstrate that blocking PAFR using GB wouldn't disturb proliferation and cell-cycle movement in cancer cells growing in conditions without radiation exposure. This indicates the weak side-effect of PAFR inhibitor as an assistant medicine of radiotherapy.
Even though GB has few effect on cell growth of X-ray untreated PC3 and LNCaP cells, it can completely block radiation-induced P62 expression and remarkably reduce radiation-induced Beclin 1 serine phosphorylation and autophagosome formation (Figure (Figure5D).5D). The phosphorylated Beclin 1 plays an essential role in autophagy through forming complex with VPS34 and cross talking with various autophagy stimulatory or inhibitory molecules . Although it has been known that activation of some cell surface GPCRs (e.g. T1R1/T1R3) suppresses autophagy via interfering mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) [25, 26], the expounded mechanism may not be applicable to all GPCRs. In this study, we demonstrate the elevated PAFR can bind to Beclin 1, impeding its serine phosphorylation and inactivation. Importantly, the effect only occurs in cells expressing PAFR after irradiation exposure.
Previous studies are conflicting in the effect of autophagy manipulation on radiosensitivity [27–29]. Causes for the conflicts may be including but not limited to (1) the different time of detecting autophagy post irradiation, (2) the use of cells with elevated PAFR expression after irradiation rather than that without alteration of PAFR expression in response to radiation, (3) the utilize of cell proliferation assays base upon mitochondrial activity rather than cell clonogenic survival assay base on directly detecting cell growth to determine the effect of autophagy induction on PCa cell survival. Moreover, a sequence of evidences support our results: (1) several lines proofs indicate that decreased Beclin 1 expression or activation results in tumor development [20, 30, 31]: Disable Mutant Beclin 1 can lead to autophagy suppression, anchorage-independent cell growth and enhance Akt-driven carcinogenesis. In vivo, allelic loss of Beclin 1 results in increment in the incidence of spontaneous malignancies in transgenic mice. In addition, xenograft NSCLCs formed by cells with mutated inactive form of Beclin 1 are resistant to both EGFR inhibitor and chemotherapy. (2) As a proverbial growth factor, epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulates cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation by binding to its receptor EGFR . Meanwhile, activated EGFR by EGF impedes the function of Beclin 1 and inhibits autophagy induction . (3) Through activating ATG1 kinase, mTOR restrains autophagy induction . As one of the conserved kinases, it can simultaneously promote cell growth by activating a series of metabolic pathways and by inhibiting catabolic pathways . Besides autophagy, other membrane-trafficking functions are also depend on Beclin 1, so we can't affirmatively claim that autophagy suppression rather than other destruction of membrane-trafficking events contributes to tumor growth. However, we did observe decreased cell viability and increased cell death in PCa with boosted autophagy, increased cell viability and decreased cell death with suppressed autophagy. All of these evidences support our conclusion that autophagy is negatively correlated with tumor growth at least in some defined conditions. Together, our data suggest that (1) inhibition of PAFR selectively enhances the sensitivity of PCa cells to radiation, and (2) autophagy induction contributes to irradiation responses in PCa.
The cell lines PC3, LNCaP, DU145 and RWPE-1 were obtained from the China Center of ATCC (Wuhan, China). Ginkgolide B (GB) was purchased from Selleck (S1343). Antibodies specific for PAFR, PARP and PCNA were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Antibodies specific for activated caspase 3, LC3B, Beclin-1, phosphorylated Beclin 1 at Ser93 (p-Beclin 1), 4E-BP1, phosphorylated 4E-BP1 at Ser65 (p-4E-BP1), ULK1 and phosphorylated ULK1 at ser757 (p-ULK1) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). PCR reagents were purchased from Roche. Other reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) except where otherwise indicated.
PC3, LNCaP and DU145 were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Gibco, Shanghai) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Melbourne) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. RWPE-1 were maintained in Keratinocyte Serum Free Medium (K-SFM, Gibco, USA) supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin. stable transfected cell line (PC3-shPAFR) was generated by transfection of psi-LVRU6MP-PAFR followed by sequential selection with 1 μmol/ml puromycin. Plasmid transfection was conducted using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen).
The experiments were conducted as described previously . In brief, Cells received treatment with irradiation (or sham treatment) and PAFR inhibitor Ginkgolide B (or control vehicle). After irradiation, cells were trypsinized and resuspended in pre-warmed fresh medium containing 100 μM GB (or control treatment), counted and 5 × 105 cells were plated into 2 cm2 culture dishes. After one to two weeks incubation, colonies with more than 50 cells were counted. The results were fitted to non-line dose-response profiles and normalized by the effects of drug treatment alone.
Monolayer cells with logarithmic growth were exposed to 6 Gy (or other doses) of X-ray at ambient temperature. The control groups received sham treatment without irradiation. Radiation were delivered using a 220 kV X-ray irradiator at a dose rate of 2–3 Gy/min. After irradiation, the cells were immediately lysed for subsequent experiments or returned to thermostatic incubator for incubation.
Immunoblotting was conducted as described previously . In brief, cells were lysed in Radio Immunoprecipitation Assay (RIPA) lysis buffer and subjected to electrophoresis in 10% Bis-Tris Gel, transferred to PVDF membranes. Then, the protein expression were identified by indicated antibodies and ECL reagent (Thermo Scientific).
We extracted RNA using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and generated cDNA with the Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche). qPCR was conducted using FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Roche) according to manufacturer's instructions. PAFR mRNA expression was quantified and normalized to GAPDH. PAFR (Forward: GACAGCATAGAGGCTGAGGC, Reverse: TAGCCATTAGCAATGACCCC) GAPDH (Forward: TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAGC, Reverse: GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGAG).
The activity of caspase 3 was measured by using the caspase 3 activity kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, China) according to the kit instructions.
Cells were fixed (70% ethanol), centrifuged (1,000g) and resuspended in PBS containing 0.05 mg/mL RNase A, and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. After incubation, the cells were rinsed three times and stained with 10 mg/ml propidium iodide followed by filtration with a 60-μm mesh. Then, 1 × 104 cells were counted and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD Company) with ModFit software (Verity Software House, Inc.).
For CO-IP, monolayer cells were lysed and endogenous proteins were extracted by using m-Per buffer (Pierce). The lysates were incubated with PARP or Beclin 1 antibodies over night following centrifuging and the proteins were pulled down by protein A/G agarose (SantaCruz Biotechnology). After rinse, beads were dissolved in 30 ul of 2 SDS sample buffer for Western blotting.
To measure tumor formation of PC3 cells and their response to, irradiation, GB and irradiation plus GB, 6-week-old male immunocompromised NOD-SCID mice (breeding colony of Chinese Academy of Sciences) were injected subcutaneously with 107 PC3 cells. Before injection, the tumor cells were embedded in Matrigel (BD Biosciences). Eight mice were injected with each group. Tumor growth was monitored by weekly measurement of tumor length (L) and width (W) and tumor volume was estimated using the formula (π/6)(LW2). For drug treatment, the mice were treated with either 100 mg·kg-1 body weight GB or isometric DMSO without GB by intraperitonially for two course of five days per week.
One-way ANOVA was used to compare the means of two groups. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare the magnitude of changes among different conditions in more than one groups. SPSS (v.19, IBM, USA) was used to assess date. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
We thank Yong Xu (Tianjin Institute of Urology, Tianjin Medical University) for helpful comments and discussion. This work was supported by Innovation Funds of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (grants 2015YaoB) as well as the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81370869 and 81670689).
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Authors' contributionsBY, YW and JW initiated and designed the study. BY, BL, LS, XL, CR, MC, WW and JL carried out the experiments. BY, BL and LS carried out the data analysis, with valuable suggestions from YW and JW. BY, BL and LS wrote the manuscript, which was further revised by YW and JW. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.