Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 44672.
Published online 2017 March 15. doi:  10.1038/srep44672
PMCID: PMC5353674

Crystallization and hardening of poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) mouthguards during routine use


Mouthguards (MGs) made from poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA) are widely used in contact sports to prevent injuries such as breaking teeth and lip lacerations and to reduce brain concussion. However, the changes in morphology and the molecular mobility of EVA, which can affect its physical properties during practical usage, have not been precisely examined. Therefore, we attempted to determine the main factors which lead to changes in MG performance after one season of practical use by high school rugby players. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and pulse NMR measurements showed the hardening of MGs, which was associated with an increased crystallinity of the EVA resulting from prolonged usage. Furthermore, our data indicated that the increase in the relative amount of the crystalline phase may be primarily attributed to temperature fluctuations and repeated changes in pressure, which could cause the hardening of EVA and eventually diminish the protective ability of MGs.

Mouthguards (MGs) can prevent sports-related oral injuries and reduce concussions, therefore, they are recently being employed for various sports1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. Materials employed for MGs are very limited, and only poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA), olefin-based thermoplastic elastomers and styrene-based thermoplastic elastomers have been certified in Japan13,14,15,16,17,18. EVA is primarily used because of its low cost and facile processability—the melting point of EVA (ca. 30–80 °C) is particularly low, for example19. Indeed, EVA sheets can easily be treated with commercially available small MG manufacturing machines; therefore, EVA MGs can be prepared not only at dental clinics but also at sporting grounds.

MGs are prepared by melting EVA sheets and subsequent molding with dental casts. MGs are detached from the molds after the temperature reaches room temperature. Following this, MGs undergo final occlusal checking by dentists before they are supplied to users. After MGs are used for long periods of time, some users report discomfort; in particular, they feel that their MGs are becoming hard. If hardening occurs, along with increased brittleness and reduced energy absorption capability, deterioration in the protective ability of the MG will occur concomitantly. To ensure that MGs are providing adequate safety levels to users, the guidelines for renewing MGs should preferably be based on scientific indicators.

Because EVA is a macromolecule with entangled polymer chains comprising crystalline and amorphous phases20,21, we presumed that the discomfort relating to the fit of MGs would mainly be derived not from chemical degradation but from the state of those phases, which may be influenced by temperature fluctuations and/or repeated changes in pressure. In this study, we precisely analysed routinely used MGs and EVA films using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), solid-state NMR and pulse NMR measurements22,23,24,25,26,27 to identify the factors that affect MG morphology and molecular mobility.

Results and Discussion

NMR spectroscopic analyses of MGs after one season of use

The solid-state cross-polarization magic-angle spinning (CP/MAS) 13C NMR spectra of a piece from MG[var phi]1 and another from MG1 that contact on tooth#16, which is one of the most compressed occlusion parts of the MG, are displayed in Fig. 1. The notation MG1 represents a MG that was routinely used by user 1 for one season (10 months), whereas MG[var phi]1 represents the excess portions of the MG material, which were obtained after the lamination and subsequent trimming of MG1 and preserved at room temperature for one season. Peaks at approximately 33 and 31 ppm are known to result from CH2 units in the ethylene groups of the crystalline and amorphous phases, respectively, whereas the peak corresponding to CH3 in the methyl group of acetate appears at 22 ppm20,21. As shown in Fig. 1a, the intensity of the peak corresponding to the amorphous phase was higher than that corresponding to the crystalline phase. Conversely, in Fig. 1b, the intensity of the peak corresponding to the crystalline phase was higher than that corresponding to the amorphous phase. Such phenomena were observed in all the MGs examined in this study (Table 1). These results indicate that the usage of MGs can increase the ratio of the crystalline phase present in EVA. Incidentally, the solution 13C NMR spectra of used MGs remained unchanged compared with those of unused MGs (data not shown), indicating that no chemical decomposition of EVA (e.g., hydrolysis of the acetate group)28 occurred during the usage period.

Figure 1
Solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR spectra of (a) a piece from MG[var phi]1 and (b) the piece of MG1 that contacts on tooth#16.
Table 1
Crystalline ratio (%) determined by solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR spectroscopy.

In solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR, the efficiency of the cross-polarization from 1H to 13C in the crystalline phase is known to be higher than that in the amorphous phase. Therefore, in Fig. 1a, the ratio of the amount of the crystalline phase to that of the amorphous phase is, in fact, not as large as that indicated by the ratio of the two corresponding peaks. However, the change in the ratio of the peaks between unused and used MGs can be compared, and accordingly, the difference between the spectra (Fig. 1a,b) could be attributed to the crystallization during routine use.

We then assumed that the increase in the crystalline ratio may increase the fraction of restricted components in MGs. Pulse NMR measurements were therefore performed using the above-mentioned pieces of MG[var phi]1–8 and MG1–8 to evaluate molecular mobility29,30. The observed data were fit to a hybrid of exponential and Gaussian functions to obtain the fraction ratios for the rigid, intermediate, and mobile components (Figure S1). As shown in Table 2, which summarizes the fractions of the rigid component for MG[var phi]1–8 and MG1–8, the magnetization fractions demonstrate that MG usage increases the rigid component instead of decreasing the intermediate and mobile components, indicating a reduction in molecular mobility.

Table 2
Rigid component (%) of MG determined using pulse NMR spectroscopy.

In summary, the CP/MAS 13C NMR and pulse NMR measurements show that the usage of EVA MG increases the crystalline fraction, which restricts molecular mobility and leads to the eventual hardening of the MG.

Verification of the effect of temperature fluctuations by DSC

We attempted to verify the effects of temperature fluctuations on the crystallization behaviour of EVA films (0.030 cm thickness) with different vinyl acetate (VA) contents of 9%, 14% and 28%, for EVA9, EVA14 and EVA28, respectively, using DSC analysis. According to the solution 13C NMR spectra, the VA content of EVA28 was nearly equal to that of the EVA sheet (Drufosoft®) used to prepare the examined MGs.

Melting of unannealed EVA9 started at approximately 30 °C and ended after the stark endotherm at approximately 95 °C, as shown in the DSC curves of the heating process (Fig. 2a). In the cases of EVA14 and EVA28, melting started at approximately 30 °C; the former ended with a strong endotherm at approximately 90 °C, while the latter ended with a gently sloping approximately peak at approximately 70 °C (Fig. 2b,c). The decrease in the maximum intensity and temperature of the endothermic peaks depended on VA content, reflecting the thickness of lamellae31,32 mainly comprising ethylene units. Higher ethylene content, i.e. lower VA content, tended to provide thicker lamellae and enhance the crystallinity of EVA, although the broad melting ranges indicated that the lengths of the polyethylene strands between the VA units were widely distributed. Meanwhile, it can be stated that thin lamellae are produced regardless of the VA content because all films started melting at a low temperature (approximately 30 °C). This suggested that the crystallization of MG could progress in the mouth, i.e. at body temperature, during routine use.

Figure 2
DSC curves of the heating process of (a) EVA9, (b) EVA14, and (c) EVA28. Samples: unannealed (black), annealed at 60 °C (red), annealed at 80 °C (green), and annealed at 100 °C (blue). New endothermic peaks ...

Annealing of EVA9, EVA14, and EVA 28 resulted in a new gentle endothermic peak at approximately 70 °C when the films were annealed at 60 °C (Fig. 2a–c), and annealing of EVA9 and EVA14 at 80 °C resulted in a sharp endothermic peak at approximately 90 °C (Fig. 2a,b). Although the new endothermic peaks are attributed to the melting of the crystalline phase by the annealing treatments, it was commonly observed that annealing of the EVA films at the crystallization temperature (Tc)19 or the closest temperature above Tc resulted in a relatively clear peak maximum for the melting temperature (Tm), i.e. Tc = 80, 71 and 48 °C for EVA9, EVA14 and EVA28, respectively (Figs 2 and S2). Thus, these results indicate that the crystallinity of EVA MGs greatly depends on the status of the ethylene moieties and is significantly influenced by temperature fluctuations at ranges closer to Tc.

Furthermore, we analysed the effect of temperature fluctuations using Drufosoft® films (thickness = 0.30 cm, which is approximately equal to that of typical MGs) with or without treatment of repeated thermal cycles (100 times). Two different protocols of thermal cycling were employed; one was shuttling between 25 °C and 37 °C and the other was shuttling between 6 °C and 22 °C as a reference condition (Fig. 3). Intriguingly, in the former condition, a new endothermic peak appeared at approximately 45 °C (Fig. 3a), but, in contrast, the latter condition caused little changes in the DSC thermogram (Fig. 3b). These results show that repeated temperature fluctuations even between close temperatures, i.e., ambient and body temperatures, can affect the crystallinity of EVA MGs.

Figure 3
DSC curves of the heating process of Drufosoft® films with or without treatment by thermal cycles (100 times) executed using a protocol with repeated temperature fluctuations (a) between 25 °C and 37 °C or (b) between ...

Verification of the effect of temperature fluctuations using solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR

The tendency towards crystallinity discovered in the DSC measurements was also confirmed by solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR analyses. As shown in Fig. 4a, although the intensity of the peak corresponding to the crystalline phase (at 33 ppm) was higher than that corresponding to the amorphous phase (at 31 ppm), the highest difference was observed in the spectrum of EVA9 annealed at 80 °C, which is equal to Tc. Similarly, the highest differences were observed in EVA14 annealed at 80 °C (Tc = 71 °C) and in EVA28 annealed at 60 °C (Tc = 48 °C), respectively (Fig. 4b,c). Furthermore, intriguingly, when the spectra of unannealed EVA films were compared, the ease of crystallization obviously reflected the ethylene content.

Figure 4
Solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR spectra of (a) EVA9, (b) EVA14, and (c) EVA28. Samples: unannealed (black), annealed at 60 °C (red), annealed at 80 °C (green), and annealed at 100 °C (blue).

Verification of the effect of temperature fluctuations using pulse NMR

The molecular mobility in EVA films (0.030 cm thickness) was analysed using pulse NMR measurements. As compared with the unannealed EVA9 film, EVA9 films annealed at either 60 °C or 80 °C exhibited increased fraction ratios and decreased spin-spin relaxation times (T2 values) for the rigid component (Table S1). EVA9 annealed at 100 °C provided similar values to unannealed EVA9. Among the fraction ratios and T2 values obtained for the rigid component in all EVA9 films examined, EVA9 annealed at 80 °C showed maximum and minimum values (36.9% and 8.90 μs), respectively. In the case of EVA14, the maximum fraction ratio (30.6%) and the minimum T2 value (9.90 μs) of the rigid component were observed in films annealed at 80 °C. Furthermore, the rigid component of EVA28 annealed at 60 °C provided the minimum T2 value (11.0 μs), although the fraction ratio was equal to or somewhat smaller than the other EVA28 films. These results, showing the effects of temperature fluctuation on the hardening of EVA films, indicate that their hardening is well correlated with the crystallinity observed using DSC and solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR measurements.

Effects of repeated pressure on crystallization and compressive deformation behaviour

To study the changes in crystallinity resulting from repeated changes in pressure, EVA28 films (EVA28_1 and EVA28_2) were analysed by solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR before and after repeated compression cycles (10,000 times at 6.0 MPa). As shown in Fig. 5a, the crystalline component of EVA28_1, corresponding to the signal at 33 ppm, seemed to increase slightly after compression (the ratios of the crystalline component in EVA28_1 before and after repeated compression cycles were 29.9% and 30.5%, respectively). This film was immediately subjected to cooling in ice cold water during its preparation. In contrast, an increase in the crystalline component after compression was clearly observed in EVA28_2, which was gradually cooled down to 25 °C during its preparation (the ratios of the crystalline component in EVA28_2 before and after repeated compression cycles were 32.0% and 35.5%, respectively) (Fig. 5b). Although both results indicate that repeated mechanical compression can induce the crystallization of MGs, the difference may be because EVA-28_2 originally contained a higher ratio of the crystalline component than EVA-28_1, as shown in the NMR spectra of the uncompressed films. In particular, the difference indicates that, in addition to repeated mechanical compressions, the presence of seed crystals could further accelerate crystallization within EVA MGs.

Figure 5
Solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR spectra of (a) EVA28_1 and (b) EVA28_2 before (black) and after (red) repeated compression cycles (10,000 times at 6.0 MPa).

Finally, we analysed compressive deformation behaviour using Drufosoft® films (thickness = 0.30 cm) before and after repeated compression cycles (5,000 times at 6.0 MPa). As shown in Fig. 6, compressive stress–strain curves clearly showed that the repeated compression resulted in a decrease in compressive strain versus compressive stress, indicating the decreased capacity of MG to withstand mechanical compressions.

Figure 6
Compressive stress–strain curves of Drufosoft® films (thickness = 0.30 cm) before (black) and after (red) repeated compression cycles (5,000 times at 6.0 MPa).


We focused on temperature fluctuations and repeated pressure changes as possible causes of deterioration in EVA MGs. To this end, we precisely analysed used MGs, Drufosoft® and EVA films with different VA contents. The solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR measurements showed significant increases in the crystalline components present in eight MGs after 10 months of routine use. These changes could generally be reproduced by heat annealing at temperatures around Tc. Furthermore, pulse NMR measurements indicated that increased crystallinity results to the hardening of EVA materials, which may lead to a loss of the MGs’ protective ability. Generally, MGs are used at around body temperature (37 °C), which is lower than the Tc of EVA28 (48 °C); however, repeated cycles of temperature fluctuations between ambient and body temperatures could result in increased crystallinity and hardening because melting of this material starts at around 30 °C. In addition, EVA MGs should not be stored around or above Tc, even for a short period of time.

Repeated mechanical compression (6.0 MPa, 10,000 times) also increased the crystallinity of EVA28 films, although the effect was not as large as the effect observed in the solid-state 13C NMR spectra of annealed samples. Finally, we verified the effect of repeated pressure changes using used EVA material, i.e. Drufosoft® (6.0 MPa, 5,000 times) and observed decreased compressive strain versus compressive stress in the compressed film.

Our experimental data indicate that both temperature fluctuations and repeated pressure changes may affect the protective ability of EVA MGs, and we therefore suggest that changes in the crystallinity of EVA during routine use become one of the key scientific indicators of MG deterioration. Ideally, these changes should be measured by non-destructive methods, for e.g., using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) apparatus, while the routinely used MGs were cut into pieces and analysed. However, MRI cannot be applied till now owing to technical limitations in resolution and signal/noise ratios33. Further development of NMR apparatus and/or application of other spectroscopic methodologies, such as terahertz (THz) imaging34,35, will enable non-destructive detection of the crystallinity of EVA MGs.

Experimental Procedure


Clear-transparent Drufosoft® Type SQ EVA with a 3 mm thickness (Dreve-Dentamid GmbH, Unna, Germany) was used as the MG material. EVA pellets with various vinyl acetate (VA) contents, viz., 9, 14 and 28% VA, were purchased from Scientific Polymer Products, Inc. (NY, USA). In this study, films prepared from those pellets were named EVA9, EVA14 and EVA28, respectively.

Preparations of MGs and EVA films

Using a dental pressure laminate machine, Drufomat SQ (Dreve-Dentamid GmbH, Unna, Germany), eight MGs were prepared from respective dental casts, which were formed from eight high school rugby players (also referred to as ‘users’). The excess portions of the respective MG materials (MG[var phi]x), which were obtained after the lamination and subsequent trimming of MGs, were preserved at room temperature as controls, whereas the prepared MGs (MGx) were used for one season (10 months), where x = user number (Tables 1 and and2).2). Methods were conducted according to the relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants. The implementation plan of this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Dental College (Ethical Clearance No. 437).

EVA films, i.e. EVA9, EVA14 and EVA28, were prepared from the EVA pellets using a compression-molding machine, Table-type-test press SA-303-I-S (Tester Sangyo Co Ltd., Saitama, Japan). The pellets underwent compression molding at 230 °C and 45 MPa for 10 min followed by quick quenching in ice-cold water to yield the unannealed EVA films with a thickness of 0.30 or 0.030 cm. Annealed EVA films were prepared by reheating the unannealed films at 60, 80 or 100 °C for 60 min and subsequent quick quenching in ice-cold water. To confirm reproducibility, preparation and measurement of EVA films were performed in three independent experiments.

13C NMR measurements

The solution 13C NMR and the solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin K.K., Kanagawa, Japan). The solution 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 75 MHz after samples were dissolved by soaking in chloroform overnight. Once the samples are dissolved, the crystalline phase is no longer retained. Therefore, the spectra can only reflect the changes in chemical structure but not those in polymer morphologies. For the solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR, all samples were packed in a zirconia rotor with a 4 mm diameter and spun at 4 kHz in the instrument. The contact and repetition times were set at 2 ms and 5 s, respectively.

Pulse NMR measurements

Pulse NMR measurements were made on a JEOL MU-25 spectrometer (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). A solid-echo pulse sequence provided free induction decay curves, which were fitted using a hybrid of exponential and Gaussian functions (Figure S1)29, and in this way fraction ratios and T2 values could be determined (Tables 2 and S1).

DSC measurements

DSC measurements were conducted on a Diamond DSC instrument (PerkinElmer Japan Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan) calibrated with indium and tin standards36,37. The DSC scans were performed under a nitrogen atmosphere over a temperature range from 0 to 150 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.

Repeated thermal cycle experiments

Drufosoft® films (thickness = 0.30 cm) were obtained by cutting the top face of box-type MG imitations (Figure S4), which were prepared as for the MGs using Drufomat SQ with a rectangular plaster cast instead of a cast constructed from a user. DSC curves were measured for the Drufosoft® films with or without treatment by repeated thermal cycles (100 times) using a TC-312 thermal cycler (Techne Ltd., Cambridge, UK)38,39,40 (Fig. 3). Some samples were set into the thermal cycler (Figure S5) followed by thermal treatment with two different protocols (repeated temperature fluctuations between 25 °C for 60 min and 37 °C for 60 min, and between 6 °C for 60 min and 22 °C for 60 min) (Figure S3) prior to DSC measurements; the others were analysed by DSC without the thermal treatment.

Repeated compression experiments

Two types of unannealed EVA28 films (length, width and thickness = 1.2 cm, 1.2 cm and 0.30 cm, respectively) underwent 10,000 repeated cycles of compression and release with 864 N of force (i.e. 6.0 MPa) using a Strograph E3-L (Toyo Seiki Seisaku-sho, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature. The first type of EVA film was prepared in compliance with the above-mentioned procedure to yield the EVA28_1 film. The second film type was prepared as follows: EVA28 pellets underwent compression molding at 230 °C and 45 MPa for 10 min followed by gradual overnight cooling to 25 °C in an incubator, M-230FN (Taitec Corporation, Saitama, Japan), to yield the EVA28_2 film. All samples were analysed by solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR measurements.

Compressive stress–strain measurements

Using a Strograph E3-L, compressive stress–strain curves were measured for Drufosoft® films (length, width and thickness = 0.5 cm, 0.5 cm and 0.30 cm, respectively) before and after repeated cycles (5,000 times) of compression and release at 150 N (i.e. 6.0 MPa) and at room temperature. Drufosoft® films were prepared as for the MGs using Drufomat SQ but using a rectangular plaster cast instead of a cast formed from a user.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Kuwahara, R. et al. Crystallization and hardening of poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) mouthguards during routine use. Sci. Rep. 7, 44672; doi: 10.1038/srep44672 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information:


Financial supports from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grants 25463024, 25463025 and 26288098) are gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Katsushi Katano, DDS; and Fumio Yarita, DDS for their generous assistance in dental clinical works.


The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions R.K. performed most of the analytical experiments, processed the data, and drafted the manuscript. R.T. and N.O. contributed to the collection and assembly of the data and H.U. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data. K.N. and T.T. implemented the dental clinical work and data interpretation. T.Y. set up the project and led the research process. All authors have discussed the results and approved the manuscript.


  • Sigurdsson A. Evidence-based review of prevention of dental injuries. Pediatr. Dent. 35, 184–190 (2013). [PubMed]
  • ADA Council on Access, Prevention and Interprofessional Relations & ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. Using mouthguards to reduce the incidence and severity of sports-related oral injuries. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 137, 1712–17120 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Maeda Y., Kumamoto D., Yagi K. & Ikebe K. Effectiveness and fabrication of mouthguards. Dent. Traumatol. 25, 556–564 (2009). [PubMed]
  • Ozawa T. et al. . Shock absorption ability of mouthguard against forceful, traumatic mandibular closure. Dent. Traumatol. 30, 204–210 (2014). [PubMed]
  • Bourguignon C. & Sigurdsson A. Preventive strategies for traumatic dental injuries. Dent. Clin. North. Am. 53, 729–749 (2009). [PubMed]
  • Winters J. & DeMont R. Role of mouthguards in reducing mild traumatic brain injury/concussion incidence in high school football athletes. Gen. Dent. 62, 34–38 (2014). [PubMed]
  • Hasegawa K. et al. . Does clenching reduce indirect head acceleration during rugby contact? Dent. Traumatol. 30, 259–64 (2014). [PubMed]
  • Narimatsu K. et al. . Effect of clenching with a mouthguard on head acceleration during heading of a soccer ball. Gen. Dent. 63, 41–46 (2015). [PubMed]
  • Warnet L. & Greasley A. Transient forces generated by projectiles on variable quality mouthguards monitored by instrumented impact testing. Br. J. Sports. Med. 35, 257–262 (2001). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • de Wet F. A., Heyns M. & Pretorius J. Shock absorption potential of different mouth guard materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 82, 301–306 (1999). [PubMed]
  • Johnston T. & Messer L. B. An in vitro study of the efficacy of mouthguard protection for dentoalveolar injuries in deciduous and mixed dentitions. Endod. Dent. Traumatol. 12, 277–285 (1996). [PubMed]
  • Takeda T. et al. . Can mouthguards prevent mandibular bone fractures and concussions? A laboratory study with an artificial skull model. Dent. Traumatol. 21, 134–140 (2005). [PubMed]
  • Takahashi M. & Koide K. Optimal heating condition of mouthguard sheet in vacuum-pressure formation: part 2 Olefin-based thermoplastic elastomer. Dent. Traumatol. 32, 90–94 (2016). [PubMed]
  • Suzuki H. et al. . Use of polyolefin as mouthguard material as compared to ethylene vinyl acetate. Int. J. Oral-Med. Sci. 6, 14–18 (2007).
  • Takeda T. The effect of wearing mouthguard and difference of occlusal supportive area on the craniofacial safety. Shikwa Gakuho 103, 705–713 (2003).
  • Park J. B., Shaull K. L., Overton B. & Donly K. J. Improving mouth guards. J. Prosthet. Dent. 72, 373–380 (1994). [PubMed]
  • Bishop B. M., Davies E. H. & von Fraunhofer J. A. Materials for mouth protectors. J. Prosthet. Dent. 53, 256–261 (1985). [PubMed]
  • Going R. E., Loehman R. E. & Chan M. S. Mouthguard materials: their physical and mechanical properties. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 89, 132–138 (1974). [PubMed]
  • Shi X. M., Zhang J., Jin J. & Chen S. J. Non-isothermal crystallization and melting of ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers with different vinyl acetate contents. Express Polym. Lett. 2, 623–629 (2008).
  • Wang L., Fang P., Ye C. & Feng J. Solid-state NMR characterizations on phase structures and molecular dynamics of poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate). J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 44, 2864–2879 (2006).
  • Zhang Q., Lin W., Yang G. & Chen Q. Studies on the phase structure of ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers by solid-state 1H- and 13C-NMR. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 40, 2199–2207 (2002).
  • Gould T. E. et al. . Characterization of mouthguard materials: Thermal properties of commercialized products. Dent. Mater. 25, 1593–1602 (2009). [PubMed]
  • Gould T. E., Piland S. G., Shin J., Hoyle C. E. & Nazarenko S. Characterization of mouthguard materials: Physical and mechanical properties of commercialized products. Dent. Mater. 25, 771–780 (2009). [PubMed]
  • Meng F. H. et al. . Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and temperature-modulated DSC study of three mouthguard materials. Dent. Mater. 23, 1492–1499 (2007). [PubMed]
  • Velayudhan S., Ramesh P. & Varma H. K. Effect of vinylacetate content on crystallinity and second-order transitions in ethylene—vinylacetate copolymers. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 13, 517–522 (2002). [PubMed]
  • Guerard S., Barou J. L., Petit J. & Poisson P. Characterization of mouth-formed mouthguards: thermal performance. Dent. Mater. J. 33, 799–804 (2014). [PubMed]
  • McNair O. D., Gould T. E., Piland S. G. & Savin D. A. Characterization of mouthguard materials: A comparison of a commercial material to a novel thiolene family. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. APP.40402 (2014).
  • Marin M. L., Jimenez A., Lopez J. & Vilaplana J. Thermal degradation of ethylene (vinyl acetate). Kinetic analysis of thermogravimetric data. J. Therm. Anal. 47, 247–258 (1996).
  • Kakiage M., Uehara H. & Yamanobe T. Novel in situ NMR measurement system for evaluating molecular mobility during drawing from highly entangled polyethylene melts. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 29, 1571–1576 (2008).
  • Uehara H., Yamanobe T. & Komoto T. Relationship between solid-state molecular motion and morphology for ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene crystallized under different conditions. Macromolecules 33, 4861–4870 (2000).
  • Wunderlich B. Macromolecular Physics: Volume 2, (Academic Press, 1976).
  • Matsuda H., Aoike T., Uehara H., Yamanobe T. & Komoto T. Crystalline surface free energy of linear polyethylene as estimated from a combination of crystal thickness distribution and DSC melting curve shapes, Kobunshi Ronbunshu 58, 326–331(2001).
  • Kitamura T. et al. . A method for measuring tooth shape by magnetic resonance imaging using a thermoplastic elastomer dental mouthpiece. IEICE Tech. Rep. 107, 7–10 (2007).
  • Haaser M. et al. . Evaluating the effect of coating equipment on tablet film quality using terahertz pulsed imaging. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 85, 1095–1102 (2013). [PubMed]
  • Hoshina H. et al. . Higher order conformation of poly(3-hydroxyalkanoate)s studied by terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 101904 (2010).
  • Kato S., Tanaka H., Yamanobe T. & Uehara H. In situ analysis of melt-drawing behavior of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene films with different molecular weights: roles of entanglements on oriented crystallization. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 5062–5070 (2015). [PubMed]
  • Uehara H. et al. . Highly transparent and robust poly(tetrafluoroethylene) membrane prepared by biaxial melt-drawing. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 299, 669–673 (2014).
  • Mullis K. B. & Faloona F. A. Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol. 155, 335–350 (1987). [PubMed]
  • Saiki R. K. et al. . Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239, 487–491 (1988). [PubMed]
  • Kuwahara M. et al. . Systematic characterization of 2′-deoxynucleoside-5′-triphosphate analogs as substrates for DNA polymerases by polymerase chain reaction and kinetic studies on enzymatic production of modified DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 5383–5394 (2006). [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group