PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of oncotargetLink to Publisher's site
 
Oncotarget. 2017 January 24; 8(4): 6364–6375.
Published online 2016 December 22. doi:  10.18632/oncotarget.14088
PMCID: PMC5351638

Radiolabeled novel mAb 4G1 for immunoSPECT imaging of EGFRvIII expression in preclinical glioblastoma xenografts

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutant III (EGFRvIII) is exclusively expressed in tumors, such as glioblastoma, breast cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma, but never in normal organs. Increasing evidence suggests that EGFRvIII has clinical significance in glioblastoma prognosis due to its enhanced tumorigenicity and chemo/radio resistance, thus the development of an imaging approach to early detect EGFRvIII expression with high specificity is urgently needed. To illustrate this point, we developed a novel anti-EGFRvIII monoclonal antibody 4G1 through mouse immunization, cell fusion and hybridoma screening and then confirmed its specificity and affinity by a serial of assays. Following biodistribution and small animal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging of 125I-4G1 in EGFRvIII positive/negative tumor-bearing mice were performed and evaluated to verify the tumor accumulation of this radiotracer. The biodistribution indicated that 125I-4G1 showed prominent tumor accumulation at 24 h post-injection, which reached maximums of 11.20 ± 0.75% ID/g and 13.98 ± 0.57% ID/g in F98npEGFRvIII and U87vIII xenografts, respectively. In contrast, 125I-4G1 had lower tumor accumulation in F98npEGFR and U87MG xenografts. Small animal SPECT/CT imaging revealed that 125I-4G1 had a higher tumor uptake in EGFRvIII-positive tumors than that in EGFRvIII-negative tumors. This study demonstrates that radiolabeled 4G1 can serve as a valid probe for the imaging of EGFRvIII expression, and would be valuable into the clinical translation for the diagnosis, prognosis, guiding therapy, and therapeutic efficacy evaluation of tumors.

Keywords: EGFRvIII, monoclonal antibody, specificity, tumor, SPECT imaging

INTRODUCTION

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a member of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases, is a 170 kDa transmembrane glycoprotein that is overexpressed in a variety of solid tumors [13]. Multiple ligands, including EGF, transforming growth factor-a, amphiregulin, betacellulin, and epiregulin, activate EGFR. Upon binding of the ligand to the EGFR extracellular domain, downstream pathways and several downstream signaling cascades are activated to induce the transcription of genes involved in cell proliferation, tumor invasion, and metastasis [4]. A variety of EGFR-targeting chemotherapeutic drugs, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been developed to treat cancer patients by blocking EGFR signal transduction [5, 6]. However, a large number of studies show that only a minority of patients benefit from these drugs, and the limited efficacy of small molecule TKIs (gefitinib and erlotinib) and mAbs (cetuximab, panitumumab, and zalutumumab) against EGFR is mainly attributed to EGFR mutations [79].

Among EGFR mutations, EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII) has attracted increasing attention. EGFRvIII harbors an in-frame deletion of exons 2-7 that encode amino acid residues 6-273. This deletion produces a truncated 150 kDa protein that shows weak but constitutive oncogenic activation in a ligand-independent manner [1012]. Glioblastoma multiforme, the most common and malignant type of primary brain tumors, is often associated with EGFRvIII expression [13, 14]. Such expression can be regarded as a marker of poor prognosis because of its potential to confer enhanced tumorigenicity to gliomas [1517]. Recent studies have demonstrated that EGFRvIII is expressed in glioma stem cells (GSCs) and may be a biomarker of GSCs [18]. Moreover, increasing studies have confirmed that EGFRvIII-positive cells are more radioresistant and chemoresistant to EGFR inhibitors because of the constitutively active receptor tyrosine kinase in EGFRvIII [1921]. Thus, it is necessary to examine EGFRvIII expression before and after radio/chemotherapy for patient prognosis and prediction of drug resistance to administer the appropriate individualized therapy. Thus far, several EGFRvIII detection methods have been developed, including reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), real-time RT-PCR, tumor immunohistochemistry, and blood tests. However, these detection methods usually result in inconsistent results due to the limitations of their methodology [2224]. More importantly, these methods are not applicable to noninvasive in vivo detection or real-time monitoring of EGFRvIII expression.

In recent years, molecular imaging has emerged as a novel and rapidly growing multidisciplinary research field with the combination of molecular biology and in vivo imaging [25]. Molecular imaging not only enables noninvasive in vivo imaging, which reflects biological processes at cellular and sub-cellular levels, but also allows real-time monitoring of multiple molecular events and drug effects at molecular and cellular levels. Therefore, molecular imaging has been widely applied to assess disease progression at the molecular pathologic level for early diagnosis of cancer as well as neurological and cardiovascular diseases. Hence, the development of a molecular imaging probe to detect EGFRvIII expression before radiotherapy or chemotherapy would enable more accurate patient prognosis and prediction of drug sensitivity.

In this study, we developed a nuclear molecular imaging probe by labeling a novel anti-EGFRvIII mAb, 4G1, with a radioisotope and evaluated its potential to detect EGFRvIII expression in glioblastoma xenograft models by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging.

RESULTS

Production and characterization of novel mAb against EGFRvIII

After fusion of SP2/0 myeloma cells and spleen cells from immunized BALB/c mice, 157 positive hybridoma clones were obtained after initial ELISA screening. Among them, four hybridoma clones with the highest titer (4G1, 1F1, 7C7 and 4D3) were selected for further expansion after repeated screening. Finally, 4G1 was selected for further study because it had the highest titer, which immunoglobulin subtype was IgG2a.

Affinity and specificity of 4G1

Several experiments were performed to evaluate the affinity and specificity of 4G1. As shown in Figure Figure1A,1A, the IC50 value of 125I-4G1 was 1.83 ± 0.03 nmol/L. To determine the Kd of 125I-4G1 and number of binding sites per F98npEGFRvIII cell (Bmax), we performed a saturation binding assay. The Kd value was 4.83 ± 0.12 nmol/L, and the Bmax was approximately 1.21 ± 0.61 × 106 sites/cell (Figure (Figure1B1B).

Figure 1
In vitro inhibition of 125I-4G1 binding to EGFRvIII on F98npEGFRvIII cells by unlabeled 4G1 showed that the IC50 value was 1.83 ± 0.03 nmol/L (n = 3, mean ± SD) (A). Saturation binding of 125I-4G1 to EGFRvIII on F98npEGFRvIII cells showed ...

The binding assay results showed that 125I-4G1 exclusively bound to the EGFRvIII protein expressed by F98npEGFRvIII and U87vIII cells, moreover unlabeled 4G1 blocked this specific binding (Figure 1C, 1D). The specificity was also confirmed by western blotting, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometric analysis. In western blot analyses, 4G1 exclusively recognized EGFRvIII expressed by F98npEGFRvIII and U87vIII cells but not wild-type EGFR expressed by F98npEGFR and U87MG cells (Figure (Figure2A).2A). Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry confirmed that 4G1 exclusively bound to EGFRvIII-positive cells and tumor tissues (Figure 2B–2D). Flow cytometry results showed that the positive rate of F98npEGFRvIII and U87vIII cells stained with 4G1 was 92.5% and 83.4%, respectively (Figure 3B, 3C), whereas 4G1 did not bind to F98npEGFR cells (Figure (Figure3A).3A). Furthermore, Flow cytometric analysis showed that 4G1 could not block the binding of Erbitux (a mAb against EGFR) to EGFRvIII on F98npEGFRvIII cells, indicating that 4G1 had no common binding sites with Erbitux (Figure (Figure3D3D).

Figure 2
Western blot results showed that 4G1 exclusively recognized EGFRvIII protein over-expressed by F98npEGFRvIII and U87vIII cells
Figure 3
The positive rates of F98npEGFRvIII (B) and U87vIII (C) cells stained with 4G1 were 92.5% and 83.4%, respectively, whereas 4G1 did not bind to F98npEGFR and U87MG cells (A, C). The positive rate of F98npEGFRvIII cells stained with Erbitux-FITC (1.0 μg) ...

Biodistribution of 125I-4G1

The biodistribution of 125I-4G1 was examined in F98npEGFR, F98npEGFRvIII, U87MG and U87vIII tumor-bearing BALB/c nude mice (Figures (Figures4,4, ,5).5). As shown in Figure Figure4D,4D, uptake of 125I-4G1 in F98npEGFRvIII tumors was 11.20 ± 0.75%ID/g, 6.82 ± 0.44%ID/g, 4.82 ± 0.22%ID/g at 24, 48 and 72 h p.i., respectively. These values were all significantly higher than 125I-4G1 uptake by F98npEGFR tumors at the corresponding time points (7.64 ± 0.24%ID/g, 4.05 ± 0.30%ID/g, and 3.27 ± 0.09%ID/g, respectively).

Figure 4
Biodistribution of 125I-4G1 in F98npEGFRvIII and F98npEGFR tumor-bearing nude mice at 24 h (A), 48 h (B), and 72 h (C) p.i. (D) 125I-4G1 uptake in F98npEGFRvIII tumors was significantly higher than that in F98npEGFR tumors. Data are expressed as the mean ...
Figure 5
Biodistribution of 125I-4G1 in U87vIII and U87MG tumor-bearing nude mice at 24 h (A), 48 h (B) and 72 h (C) p.i. (D) 125I-4G1 uptake in U87vIII tumors was significantly higher than that in U87MG tumors. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = ...

Elimination of blood radioactivity in mice with F98npEGFRvIII and F98npEGFR tumors ranged from 4.75 ± 0.81%ID/g and 4.38 ± 0.22%ID/g at 24 h p.i. to 1.28 ± 0.13%ID/g and 2.51 ± 0.08 %ID/g at 72 h p.i., respectively. For most organs, there was progressive washout of radioactivity over time, which was concomitant with the clearance of radioactivity from the blood. The uptake of 125I-4G1 in all organs was almost less than 3%ID/g at day 3 p.i.

The in vivo EGFRvIII-targeting specificity of 125I-4G1 was confirmed by examining the biodistribution of 125I-mIgG in U87vIII tumor-bearing nude mice. As shown in Figure Figure5D,5D, the tumor uptake of 125I-4G1 was significantly higher than that of 125I-mIgG (14.02 ± 0.40%ID/g vs. 10.46 ± 0.78%ID/g, P = 0.0069) at 24 h p.i. As shown in Figure Figure5,5, U87vIII tumor uptake of 125I-4G1 at 24, 48 and 72 h p.i. was 13.98 ± 0.57%ID/g, 10.82 ± 0.34%ID/g, and 7.68 ± 0.66%ID/g, respectively. These values were significantly higher than the U87MG tumor uptake of 125I-4G1 (9.98 ± 0.57%ID/g, 8.37 ± 0.03%ID/g, and 5.59 ± 0.47%ID/g, at 24, 48 and 72 h p.i., respectively).

SPECT/CT Imaging of 125I-4G1

Representative SPECT/CT images of F98npEGFR and F98npEGFRvIII tumor-bearing BALB/c nude mice are shown in Figure Figure6.6. Based on the imaging results, the uptake of 125I-4G1 in F98npEGFRvIII tumors was significantly higher than that in F98npEGFR tumors at each time point. A small amount of radioactivity was also found in blood-rich organs, such as lung and heart, as well as liver at 4 h p.i. The background radioactivity decreased over time, which was consistent with the ex vivo biodistribution data. Images with a higher contrast were obtained at 24 h p.i. Moreover, the SPECT/CT images of F98npEGFR and F98npEGFRvIII intracranial tumor models as shown in Figure Figure77 showed that 125I-4G1 was markedly higher accumulated in EGFRvIII positive glioma than EGFRvIII negative glioma, which indicates that 4G1 might be used for real-time imaging studies in patients with gliomas in future.

Figure 6
Representative small animal SPECT/CT images of F98npEGFRvIII and F98npEGFR tumor-bearing mice at 4 and 24 h p.i. 125I-4G1 uptake in F98npEGFRvIII tumors was significantly higher than that in F98npEGFR tumors at each time point
Figure 7
Representative small animal SPECT/CT images of F98npEGFRvIII and F98npEGFR intracranial tumor models at 24 h p.i. 125I-4G1 uptake in F98npEGFRvIII tumors was significantly higher than that in F98npEGFR tumors

DISCUSSION

Preclinical investigations have shown that EGFRvIII stimulates unregulated growth, survival and invasion of glioma cells, as well as angiogenesis [26, 27]. In addition, the prognostic value of EGFRvIII has been studied extensively. Current viewpoints support the notion that the presence of EGFRvIII is an independent and significant unfavorable prognostic indicator of survival [16, 17, 28, 29]. Furthermore, EGFRvIII has been implicated in resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy [1921]. Therefore, early detection of EGFRvIII expression might provide an early prognosis and suggest chemotherapeutic drug resistance. There have been several reports of EGFRvIII detection, but their results remain controversial, partly because of the lack of a consistently used EGFRvIII-specific antibody and detection assays. Moreover, these methods can not be applied to in vivo and real-time detection of EGFRvIII. Hence, a more sensitive, accurate and effective detection method should be developed and implemented.

To address this issue, we adopted a recently developed research methodology, molecular imaging, which enables noninvasive in vivo imaging and real-time monitoring of molecular biological processes at cellular and sub-cellular levels. Thus far, molecular imaging has been successfully applied to individualized therapies by assessment of disease progression, drug resistance, and disease prognosis [3032].

In this study, we developed a novel mAb, named 4G1, to detect EGFRvIII expression through molecular imaging. The affinity assay results indicated that affinity of 4G1 to EGFRvIII was as good as other similar mAbs reported by previous studies [33, 34]. A series of specificity tests showed that 4G1 specifically recognized EGFRvIII and had no cross reactivity with wild-type EGFR. These results indicated that 4G1 had the potential to be a suitable targeting molecule for EGFRvIII-positive tumor imaging. To confirm this potential, we performed biodistribution and SPECT/CT imaging in xenografted tumor models. The results of biodistribution showed that EGFRvIII-positive tumors had a higher uptake of 125I-4G1 than EGFRvIII-negative tumors. Furtherly, in the biodistribution experiment of U87vIII tumor-bearing mice, a group of 125I-mIgG was done to confirm the specific uptake of 125I-4G1 in tumors. Since mIgG could not bind to EGFRvIII, the accumulation of 125I-mIgG in U87vIII tumors should be lower than that of 125I-4G1 and thus regarded as the background attributed to tumor non-specific uptake of antibody.

Furthermore, SPECT/CT imaging of 125I-4G1 showed that EGFRvIII-positive and -negative tumors could be distinguished easily. Thus, radiolabeled 4G1 may be a promising probe targeting EGFRvIII for tumor imaging.

We also examined potential common binding sites for 4G1 and Erbitux. Erbitux has been granted full approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer [35]. Numerous studies have shown that Erbitux recognizes both EGFR and EGFRvIII [36, 37]. Our flow cytometric analyses revealed that 4G1 had no common binding sites with Erbitux. We also confirmed high affinity, specificity, and in vivo tumor accumulation of the 4G1 mAb. Considering that EGFRvIII is a prognostic and chemo/radio resistant marker, 4G1 can be easily labeled with PET or SPECT radioisotopes for potential clinical imaging of EGFRvIII expression. Moreover, 4G1 can be used as a delivery vehicle for tumor-targeted therapeutics, because EGFRvIII is exclusively expressed in tumor tissues.

Since EGFRvIII is a very promising therapeutic and diagnostic target that is exclusively expressed in tumors, it has attracted much attention. Over the past 10 years, some polyclonal [3840] or monoclonal antibodies against EGFRvIII have been developed. In consideration of potential immunological cross reaction or difference among batches of polyclonal antibody, we excluded it in the first place. For monoclonal antibodies against EGFRvIII, the mAb 806 [41] and CH12 [33] were generated by immunization of mice with EGFRvIII-overexpressing fibroblasts, whereas L8A4 [4244] was prepared by immunization of mice with peptides that were very similar to the peptides used in this study. These three mAbs have been evaluated in detail and applied to a range of research fields including EGFRvIII-xenograft therapy, immune-detection in pathological sections, drug delivery, and synergic treatment. In addition, mAb D2C7 [45], Erbitux and mAb 528 [46] have been confirmed to bind to both wild-type EGFR and EGFRvIII, which partly limits their applications and research value. To the best of our knowledge, no antibody has been applied to nuclear medical imaging to observe EGFRvIII expression in vivo so far. Thus, our study provides the first systematic evaluation of immunoSPECT imaging using an isotope-labeled EGFRvIII mAb (125I-4G1) to detect EGFRvIII expression, which provides a new real-time approach for the detection of EGFRvIII.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture, plasmids, and peptides

U87MG human glioblastoma and F98, F98npEGFR, and F98npEGFRvIII rat glioblastoma cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockvill, MD, USA). U87vIII cells were derived from U87MG cells stably transfected with the pEGFRP-N1-EGFRvIII plasmid (a gift from Dr. Janusz Rak, Cancer and Angiogenesis Laboratory, MUHCRI-Montreal Children's Hospital Research Institute, Canada) and modified to overexpress EGFRvIII protein. U87MG and F98 cells were cultured in low or high Glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37°C with 5% CO2. F98npEGFR, F98npEGFRvIII, and U87vIII cells were cultured in medium with 0.2 mg/mL G-418. Three EGFRvIII peptides (LEEKKGNYVVTDHC, EKKGNYVVTDHC, and KKGNYVVTDHC) were synthesized by GL Biochem Co., Ltd, (Shanghai, China). These peptides were conjugated with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and mixed at a ratio of 1:2:3. For enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), these three peptides were conjugated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a coating antigen.

Antibody preparation

A series of anti-EGFRvIII mAbs were prepared by AbMax Biotechnology Co., Ltd, (Beijing, China). Briefly, three BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously three times with the above three peptides at 2-week intervals. The titer of antibodies against EGFRvIII in blood samples was determined by ELISAs using the three peptide-BSA conjugates or F98npEGFRvIII cells as the coating antigens. Next, mouse spleen cells were collected and fused with SP2/0 myeloma cells. The fused cells were cultured in 10% FBS/DMEM containing hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Hybridoma colonies were maintained in 10% FBS/DMEM containing hypoxanthine-thymidine (Sigma). Hybridoma supernatants were repeatedly screened by ELISA. Finally, ascites were prepared by intraperitoneal injection of mice with 2 × 106 hybridoma cells. Ascites titers were also determined by ELISA. Furthermore, analysis of the mAb subtype was performed with standard procedures provided by the protocol of the SBA Clonotyping™ System/HRP (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc., Birmingham, UK). The mAb with highest titer was named 4G1.

In Vitro affinity and specificity evaluation of 4G1 mAb

Affinity determination

For 125I radiolabeling, 10 μg 4G1 and 37 MBq Na125I (Beijing Atom High Tech, Beijing, China) in 0.2 M (pH 7.4) phosphate-buffered (PB) were added to a vial coated with 40 μg iodogen (Sigma). After 7 min of reacting at room temperature, the reaction mixture was purified by a PD-10 column (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA).

The binding affinity of 125I-4G1 for EGFRvIII was evaluated by a saturation binding assay. Briefly, Increasing concentrations of 125I-4G1 (0–15 nmol/L) were added to F98npEGFRvIII cells. The total volume was adjusted to 300 μL. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of an excess (> 500-fold) of unlabeled 4G1. After incubation at 4°C for 4 h, the cells were washed three times with cold PBS and then solubilized with 2 mol/L NaOH. The cell-associated radioactivity was determined using a γ-counter (Wallac 1470–002, PerkinElmer, Finland). A saturation binding curve and Scatchard transformation were obtained by nonlinear regression analysis, and the binding affinity (Kd) value of 125I-4G1 was determined using GraphPad Prism 4.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The experiment was performed twice and each data point represents the average value from triplicate wells.

The binding specificity of 4G1 to EGFRvIII was evaluated in F98npEGFRvIII cells by the competitive binding assay. F98npEGFRvIII cells seeded in a 48-well plate (5 × 104 cells per well) were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 overnight to allow adherence. After washing with PBS, 3.7 kBq 125I-4G1 were added to each well in the presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled 4G1. The cells were then incubated at 4°C for 4 h. After washed three times with cold PBS and solubilized with 2 mol/L NaOH, specific binding of 125I-4G1 to F98npEGFRvIII cells was analyzed by measuring the radioactivity using the γ-counter. The experiment was performed twice with triplicate samples.

Specificity determination

Cell binding assay

F98npEGFR, F98npEGFRvIII, U87MG and U87vIII cells were trypsinized, and a single cell suspension of 1 × 106 cells were prepared in 1 ml of 1% BSA/PBS (w/v). Then, 3.7 kBq 125I-4G1 was added to cell suspensions, followed by incubation at 4°C for 4 h. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of an excess (2 μg) of unlabeled 4G1. After washing with PBS, the specific binding of 125I-4G1 to cells was analyzed by measuring the radioactivity using γ-counter.

Western blot analysis

Cells were harvested, washed three times with PBS, centrifuged, and then lysed. The protein concentrations of the lysates were determined using BCA Protein Assay Reagent (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL, USA). Total protein (50 μg) was separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes at 250 V for 2 h. Membranes were blocked for 1 h with 5% non-fat milk powder in TBS/0.1% Tween 20 and then incubated with 4G1 or rabbit anti-GAPDH polyclonal IgG (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA) at 4°C overnight. The membranes were washed and incubated with a corresponding secondary antibody conjugated with Dylight 800 (EarthOx, San Francisco, CA, USA). After washing, immunoblotted proteins were detected using an Odyssey Western Blotting Detection System (Gene, Hong Kong, China).

Immunofluorescence assay

Cells grown on LabTek chamber slides or frozen sections of tumor tissues were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde/PBS (v/v) for 15 min on ice. After blocking for 30 min with 2% BSA and 1% normal goat serum, the cells or sections were incubated with 4G1 at 4°C overnight and then the corresponding fluorescently conjugated secondary antibody. Mouse IgG was used as an isotype control. DAPI was used for nuclear staining. Fluorescence signals were detected using a confocal microscope (TCS SP5; Leica, Germany). Immunohistochemistry was performed according to previous study [18].

Flow cytometric analysis

Cells were trypsinized, and a single cell suspension of 1 × 106 cells was prepared in 100 μL of 1% BSA/PBS (w/v) and immediately stained for 2 h at room temperature with relevant primary antibodies and then incubated with the corresponding fluorescently conjugated secondary antibodies. The primary antibodies included 4G1 and Erbitux-FITC. Human IgG (Becton-Dickinson, Rutherford, NJ, USA) was used as an isotype control. Stained cells were analyzed by a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Rutherford, NJ, USA).

In Vivo evaluation of 4G1

Subcutaneous and orthotopic tumor models

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Guidelines of the Peking University Health Science Center Animal Care and Use Committee. For the subcutaneous tumor model, cells from each cell line (2 × 106) in 100 μl PBS were injected into the right upper flanks of female BALB/c nude mice. When the tumor size reached 200–300 mm3, the animals were used for biodistribution and imaging studies. As for orthotopic brain tumor model, a total of 2 × 105 cells of each cell line in 20 μl PBS were intracranially injected into the area between the cerebral cortex and dorsal hippocampus CA3 of experimental mice. When symptoms of hydrocephalus were observed, the mice immediately underwent SPECT/CT imaging [18].

Biodistribution of 125I-4G1

F98npEGFR, F98npEGFRvIII, U87MG and U87vIII tumor-bearing nude mice were randomly divided into groups (n = 4 per group). Each mouse was injected intravenously with 185 kBq 125I-4G1. Mice were euthanized, and samples or organs of interest were removed, weighed, and analyzed in the γ-counter at 24, 48, and 72 h post-injection (p.i.). The results were calculated as a percentage of the injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g). To determine the specific accumulation of 125I-4G1 in U87vIII tumors, 125I-mIgG (185 kBq) was injected intravenously into four tumor-bearing mice, and then the biodistribution of 125I-mIgG at 24 h p.i. was determined as described above.

Small animal SPECT/CT imaging

For small animal SPECT/CT imaging studies, each tumor-bearing nude mouse was injected intravenously with 55.5 MBq 125I-4G1 via the tail vein after anesthetization. The mice were placed in the prone position and imaged with a NanoScan (SPECT/CT) camera (Mediso Ltd, Budapest, Hungary) for 40 min. Imaging was performed at 4 and 24 h p.i. After completion of imaging, the mice were euthanized.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data are expressed as means ± SD. Means were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student’st test. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we generated an anti-EGFRvIII mAb, 4G1, which shows high receptor specificity, affinity and tumor uptake. Our results suggest that the radiolabeled 4G1 mAb is a promising probe to detect EGFRvIII expression in vivo by nuclear medicine imaging.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FUNDING

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) projects (81125011, 81321003, 81427802, 81420108019, 81630045, 81501520), grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2011YQ030114 and 2012ZX09102301-018), a grant from Beijing Ministry of Science and Technology (Z141100000214004), and Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA12020216).

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None.

REFERENCES

1. Ang KK, Berkey BA, Tu X, Zhang HZ, Katz R, Hammond EH, Fu KK, Milas L. Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor expression on survival and pattern of relapse in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2002;62:7350–6. [PubMed]
2. Grandis JR, Tweardy DJ. Elevated levels of transforming growth factor alpha and epidermal growth factor receptor messenger RNA are early markers of carcinogenesis in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 1993;53:3579–84. [PubMed]
3. Ongkeko WM, Altuna X, Weisman RA, Wang-Rodriguez J. Expression of protein tyrosine kinases in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;124:71–6. doi: 10.1309/BTLN5WTMJ3PCNRRC. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:127–37. doi: 10.1038/35052073. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Barth RF, Yang W, Adams DM, Rotaru JH, Shukla S, Sekido M, Tjarks W, Fenstermaker RA, Ciesielski M, Nawrocky MM, Coderre JA. Molecular targeting of the epidermal growth factor receptor for neutron capture therapy of gliomas. Cancer Res. 2002;62:3159–66. [PubMed]
6. Wu G, Yang W, Barth RF, Kawabata S, Swindall M, Bandyopadhyaya AK, Tjarks W, Khorsandi B, Blue TE, Ferketich AK, Yang M, Christoforidis GA, Sferra TJ, et al. Molecular targeting and treatment of an epidermal growth factor receptor-positive glioma using boronated cetuximab. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1260–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-2399. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Cohen EE, Kane MA, List MA, Brockstein BE, Mehrotra B, Huo D, Mauer AM, Pierce C, Dekker A, Vokes EE. Phase II trial of gefitinib 250 mg daily in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:8418–24. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1247. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Vermorken JB, Trigo J, Hitt R, Koralewski P, Diaz-Rubio E, Rolland F, Knecht R, Amellal N, Schueler A, Baselga J. Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2171–7. doi: 10.1200/jco.2006.06.7447. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Machiels JP, Subramanian S, Ruzsa A, Repassy G, Lifirenko I, Flygare A, Sorensen P, Nielsen T, Lisby S, Clement PM. Zalutumumab plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy: an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:333–43. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70034-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Nishikawa R, Ji XD, Harmon RC, Lazar CS, Gill GN, Cavenee WK, Huang HJ. A mutant epidermal growth factor receptor common in human glioma confers enhanced tumorigenicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:7727–31. [PubMed]
11. Huang HS, Nagane M, Klingbeil CK, Lin H, Nishikawa R, Ji XD, Huang CM, Gill GN, Wiley HS, Cavenee WK. The enhanced tumorigenic activity of a mutant epidermal growth factor receptor common in human cancers is mediated by threshold levels of constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation and unattenuated signaling. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:2927–35. [PubMed]
12. Wong AJ, Ruppert JM, Bigner SH, Grzeschik CH, Humphrey PA, Bigner DS, Vogelstein B. Structural alterations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in human gliomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:2965–9. [PubMed]
13. Malden LT, Novak U, Kaye AH, Burgess AW. Selective amplification of the cytoplasmic domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Res. 1988;48:2711–4. [PubMed]
14. Yamazaki H, Fukui Y, Ueyama Y, Tamaoki N, Kawamoto T, Taniguchi S, Shibuya M. Amplification of the structurally and functionally altered epidermal growth factor receptor gene (c-erbB) in human brain tumors. Mol Cell Biol. 1988;8:1816–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Tang CK, Gong XQ, Moscatello DK, Wong AJ, Lippman ME. Epidermal growth factor receptor vIII enhances tumorigenicity in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2000;60:3081–7. [PubMed]
16. Damstrup L, Wandahl Pedersen M, Bastholm L, Elling F, Skovgaard Poulsen H. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation type III transfected into a small cell lung cancer cell line is predominantly localized at the cell surface and enhances the malignant phenotype. Int J Cancer. 2002;97:7–14. [PubMed]
17. Pedersen MW, Tkach V, Pedersen N, Berezin V, Poulsen HS. Expression of a naturally occurring constitutively active variant of the epidermal growth factor receptor in mouse fibroblasts increases motility. Int J Cancer. 2004;108:643–53. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11566. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Liu XJ, Wu WT, Wu WH, Yin F, Ma SH, Qin JZ, Liu XX, Liu YN, Zhang XY, Li P, Han S, Liu KY, Zhang JM, et al. A minority subpopulation of CD133(+) /EGFRvIII(+)/EGFR(−) cells acquires stemness and contributes to gefitinib resistance. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2013;19:494–502. doi: 10.1111/cns.12092. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Lammering G, Hewit TH, Valerie K, Contessa JN, Amorino GP, Dent P, Schmidt-Ullrich RK. EGFRvIII-mediated radioresistance through a strong cytoprotective response. Oncogene. 2003;22:5545–53. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206788. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Learn CA, Hartzell TL, Wikstrand CJ, Archer GE, Rich JN, Friedman AH, Friedman HS, Bigner DD, Sampson JH. Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibition by mutant epidermal growth factor receptor variant III contributes to the neoplastic phenotype of glioblastoma multiforme. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:3216–24. [PubMed]
21. Sok JC, Coppelli FM, Thomas SM, Lango MN, Xi S, Hunt JL, Freilino ML, Graner MW, Wikstrand CJ, Bigner DD, Gooding WE, Furnari FB, Grandis JR. Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII) contributes to head and neck cancer growth and resistance to EGFR targeting. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5064–73. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-0913. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Mellinghoff IK, Wang MY, Vivanco I, Haas-Kogan DA, Zhu S, Dia EQ, Lu KV, Yoshimoto K, Huang JH, Chute DJ, Riggs BL, Horvath S, Liau LM, et al. Molecular determinants of the response of glioblastomas to EGFR kinase inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2012–24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051918. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Zhou M, Gong B, Gu J, Li Z. EGFRvIII mRNA detection in the serum of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2010;30:925–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02233.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. McIntyre JB, Bose P, Klimowicz AC, Brockton NT, Petrillo S, Matthews W, Easaw J, Magliocco A, Dort JC. Specific and sensitive hydrolysis probe-based real-time PCR detection of epidermal growth factor receptor variant III in oral squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031723. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Weissleder R, Mahmood U. Molecular imaging. Radiology. 2001;219:316–33. doi: 10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma19316. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Grandis JR, Sok JC. Signaling through the epidermal growth factor receptor during the development of malignancy. Pharmacol Ther. 2004;102:37–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2004.01.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Liu X, Liu K, Qin J, Hao L, Li X, Liu Y, Zhang X, Liu X, Li P, Han S, Mao Z, Shen L. C/EBPbeta promotes angiogenesis through secretion of IL-6, which is inhibited by genistein, in EGFRvIII-positive glioblastoma. Int J Cancer. 2014 doi: 10.1002/ijc.29319. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Shinojima N, Tada K, Shiraishi S, Kamiryo T, Kochi M, Nakamura H, Makino K, Saya H, Hirano H, Kuratsu J, Oka K, Ishimaru Y, Ushio Y. Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6962–70. [PubMed]
29. Heimberger AB, Hlatky R, Suki D, Yang D, Weinberg J, Gilbert M, Sawaya R, Aldape K. Prognostic effect of epidermal growth factor receptor and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma multiforme patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:1462–6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-1737. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Herrmann K, Wieder HA, Buck AK, Schoffel M, Krause BJ, Fend F, Schuster T, Meyer zum Buschenfelde C, Wester HJ, Duyster J, Peschel C, Schwaiger M, Dechow T. Early response assessment using 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography in high-grade non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:3552–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-3025. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. van der Bilt AR, AG Terwisscha van Scheltinga, Timmer-Bosscha H, Schroder CP, Pot L, Kosterink JG, van der Zee AG, Lub-de Hooge MN, de Jong S, de Vries EG, Reyners AK. Measurement of tumor VEGF-A levels with 89Zr-bevacizumab PET as an early biomarker for the antiangiogenic effect of everolimus treatment in an ovarian cancer xenograft model. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:6306–14. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-0406. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Liu N, Li M, Li X, Meng X, Yang G, Zhao S, Yang Y, Ma L, Fu Z, Yu J. PET-based biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of epidermal growth factor receptor-selective tracer 11C-PD153035 in humans. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:303–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.056556. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Jiang H, Wang H, Tan Z, Hu S, Wang H, Shi B, Yang L, Li P, Gu J, Wang H, Li Z. Growth suppression of human hepatocellular carcinoma xenografts by a monoclonal antibody CH12 directed to epidermal growth factor receptor variant III. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:5913–20. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.192252. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Patel D, Lahiji A, Patel S, Franklin M, Jimenez X, Hicklin DJ, Kang X. Monoclonal antibody cetuximab binds to and down-regulates constitutively activated epidermal growth factor receptor vIII on the cell surface. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:3355–66. [PubMed]
35. Bokemeyer C, Van Cutsem E, Rougier P, Ciardiello F, Heeger S, Schlichting M, Celik I, Kohne CH. Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1466–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.057. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Dreier A, Barth S, Goswami A, Weis J. Cetuximab induces mitochondrial translocalization of EGFRvIII, but not EGFR: involvement of mitochondria in tumor drug resistance? Tumour Biol. 2012;33:85–94. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0248-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Jutten B, Dubois L, Li Y, Aerts H, Wouters BG, Lambin P, Theys J, Lammering G. Binding of cetuximab to the EGFRvIII deletion mutant and its biological consequences in malignant glioma cells. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92:393–8. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.06.021. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Agnes RS, Broome AM, Wang J, Verma A, Lavik K, Basilion JP. An optical probe for noninvasive molecular imaging of orthotopic brain tumors overexpressing epidermal growth factor receptor. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11:2202–11. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-12-0211. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Gercel-Taylor C, Atay S, Tullis RH, Kesimer M, Taylor DD. Nanoparticle analysis of circulating cell-derived vesicles in ovarian cancer patients. Anal Biochem. 2012;428:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2012.06.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Wehrenberg-Klee E, Redjal N, Leece A, Turker NS, Heidari P, Shah K, Mahmood U. PET imaging of glioblastoma multiforme EGFR expression for therapeutic decision guidance. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;5:379–89. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Luwor RB, Johns TG, Murone C, Huang HJ, Cavenee WK, Ritter G, Old LJ, Burgess AW, Scott AM. Monoclonal antibody 806 inhibits the growth of tumor xenografts expressing either the de2-7 or amplified epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) but not wild-type EGFR. Cancer Res. 2001;61:5355–61. [PubMed]
42. Yang W, Barth RF, Wu G, Kawabata S, Sferra TJ, Bandyopadhyaya AK, Tjarks W, Ferketich AK, Moeschberger ML, Binns PJ, Riley KJ, Coderre JA, Ciesielski MJ, et al. Molecular targeting and treatment of EGFRvIII-positive gliomas using boronated monoclonal antibody L8A4. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:3792–802. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-0141. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Yang W, Barth RF, Wu G, Ciesielski MJ, Fenstermaker RA, Moffat BA, Ross BD, Wikstrand CJ. Development of a syngeneic rat brain tumor model expressing EGFRvIII and its use for molecular targeting studies with monoclonal antibody L8A4. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:341–50. [PubMed]
44. Yang W, Wu G, Barth RF, Swindall MR, Bandyopadhyaya AK, Tjarks W, Tordoff K, Moeschberger M, Sferra TJ, Binns PJ, Riley KJ, Ciesielski MJ, Fenstermaker RA, et al. Molecular targeting and treatment of composite EGFR and EGFRvIII-positive gliomas using boronated monoclonal antibodies. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:883–91. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-1968. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Zalutsky MR, Boskovitz A, Kuan CT, Pegram CN, Ayriss J, Wikstrand CJ, Buckley AF, Lipp ES, Herndon JE, RE 2nd McLendon, Bigner DD. Radioimmunotargeting of malignant glioma by monoclonal antibody D2C7 reactive against both wild-type and variant III mutant epidermal growth factor receptors. Nucl Med Biol. 2012;39:23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.06.005. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Gill GN, Kawamoto T, Cochet C, JD Le A Sato, Masui H, McLeod C, Mendelsohn J. Monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies which are inhibitors of epidermal growth factor binding and antagonists of epidermal growth factor binding and antagonists of epidermal growth factor-stimulated tyrosine protein kinase activity. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:7755–60. [PubMed]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC