PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of physrepLink to Publisher's site
 
Physiol Rep. 2017 March; 5(5): e13180.
Published online 2017 March 14. doi:  10.14814/phy2.13180
PMCID: PMC5350183

In vivo Ca2+ dynamics induced by Ca2+ injection in individual rat skeletal muscle fibers

Abstract

In contrast to cardiomyocytes, store overload‐induced calcium ion (Ca2+) release (SOICR) is not considered to constitute a primary Ca2+ releasing system from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) in skeletal muscle myocytes. In the latter, voltage‐induced Ca2+ release (VICR) is regarded as the dominant mechanism facilitating contractions. Any role of the SOICR in the regulation of cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) and its dynamics in skeletal muscle in vivo remains poorly understood. By means of in vivo single fiber Ca2+ microinjections combined with bioimaging techniques, we tested the hypothesis that the [Ca2+]i dynamics following Ca2+ injection would be amplified and fiber contraction facilitated by SOICR. The circulation‐intact spinotrapezius muscle of adult male Wistar rats (= 34) was exteriorized and loaded with Fura‐2 AM to monitor [Ca2+]i dynamics. Groups of rats underwent the following treatments: (1) 0.02, 0.2, and 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ injections, (2) 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ with inhibition of ryanodine receptors (RyR) by dantrolene sodium (DAN), and (3) 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ with inhibition of SR Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) by cyclopiazonic acid (CPA). A quantity of 0.02 mmol/L Ca2+ injection yielded no detectable response, whereas peak evoked [Ca2+]i increased 9.9 ± 1.8% above baseline for 0.2 mmol/L and 23.8 ± 4.3% (P < 0.05) for 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ injections. The peak [Ca2+]i in response to 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ injection was largely abolished by DAN and CPA (−85.8%, −71.0%, respectively, both P < 0.05 vs. unblocked) supporting dependence of the [Ca2+]i dynamics on Ca2+ released by SOICR rather than injected Ca2+ itself. Thus, this investigation demonstrates the presence of a robust SR‐evoked SOICR operant in skeletal muscle in vivo.

Keywords: Ca2+‐induced Ca2+ release, ryanodine receptor, sarcoplasmic reticulum, store overload‐induced Ca2+ release

Introduction

Precise control of cytoplasmic calcium ion concentration ([Ca2+]i) is crucial for regulation of myocyte function and the excitation–contraction (E–C) coupling process in particular. In skeletal muscle myocytes, contraction and relaxation are evoked by [Ca2+]i increase and decrease, respectively. The primary Ca2+ releasing systems from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) are action potential‐induced calcium release (voltage‐induced Ca2+ release; VICR) (Schneider 1994; Hernandez‐Ochoa et al. 2015), Ca2+‐induced Ca2+ release (CICR) (Endo 2009) and store overload‐induced Ca2+ release (SOICR) (Kong et al. 2007; Prakriya and Lewis 2015).

The ryanodine receptor (RyR) is a Ca2+ releasing channel on the SR membrane. In mammals, three RyR isoforms exist (RyR1, RyR2 and RyR3) with RyR1 being dominantly expressed in skeletal (Nakai et al. 1990; Otsu et al. 1990; Zorzato et al. 1990) as opposed to RyR2 in cardiac muscle (Nakai et al. 1990; Otsu et al. 1990; Zorzato et al. 1990). RyR3, discovered initially in the brain, also is present in the skeletal muscle (Giannini et al. 1995). However, RyR3 expression disappears in hind limb muscles of adult animals (Flucher et al. 1999). RyR is opened by interaction with the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR), which is the voltage‐dependent Ca2+ channel of the transverse tubule membrane (Lanner et al. 2010). Myocardial RyR2 causes Ca2+ release by binding with the Ca2+ which flows into the cytosol across the sarcolemma (Fabiato 1992; Maack and O'Rourke 2007). In marked contrast, skeletal muscle RyR1 is opened by the structural change in the RyR1‐DHPR conjugate (Beam and Bannister 2010). Because this opening occurs in the absence of Ca2+ influx from the extracellular space, unlike that for cardiomyocytes, it is thought that a rise in [Ca2+]i is not necessary for RyR1‐mediated SR Ca2+ release. However, not all SR RyR1 is in contact with DHPR. Thus, the presence of non‐DHPR‐associated RyR1 in skeletal muscle myocytes raises the possibility that these particular RyR1′s may release Ca2+ in a process instigated by Ca2+ that is released from the conjugated DHPR‐RyR1 (Klein and Schneider 2006; Pouvreau et al. 2007; Van Petegem 2012).

Although SOICR is well known to operate via RyR2 in cardiomyocytes, it has never been observed for RyR1‐bearing skeletal muscle myocytes even under conditions propagating Ca2+release via the SR (Zhou et al. 2004; Figueroa et al. 2012). Interestingly, however, the Ca2+ sensing gate on the RyR for SOICR has been identified as a common gating structure for all RyR isoforms (Chen et al. 2014) and Ca2+ release via SOICR does occur in skeletal muscle myocytes similar to cardiac myocytes expressing RyR2 (Cully et al. 2014). In addition, reduction of Ca2+ entry across the sarcolemma reduces SR Ca2+ accumulation and induces muscle fatigue (Stiber et al. 2008). Collectively, these findings suggest that Ca2+ release by SOICR might play an important role in skeletal muscle in vivo.

Because RyR regulation is extremely sensitive to the cytosolic and luminal environments, and changes thereof (Laver et al. 2000; Fill and Coppell 2002; Capes et al. 2011), direct evidence for the presence of SOICR must be obtained under in vivo conditions especially as regards pH, temperature, reactive O2 species, and O2 partial pressure. The present investigation was designed to resolve the presence and putative importance of SOICR in an in vivo skeletal muscle using Ca2+ solutions injected directly into the myocyte cytosol which bypasses the VICR process entirely. We hypothesized that the [Ca2+]i change in response to the Ca2+ solution injection would be amplified by SOICR, raising [Ca2+]i substantially and causing muscle contraction. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that this amplification would be either abolished or reduced when Ca2+ release from the SR is inhibited, either directly via the blockade of RyR by the hydantoin derivative dantrolene (DAN), or indirectly via the depletion of Ca2+ from the SR by inhibiting SERCA with cyclopiazonic acid (CPA).

Methods

Animals

Male Wistar rats (= 34, 10–14 weeks of age; Japan SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) were used in this study. Rats were maintained on a 12:12‐h light/dark cycle and received food and water ad libitum. All experiments were conducted under the guidelines established by the Physiological Society of Japan and were approved by the University of Electro‐Communications Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The rats were anesthetized using pentobarbital sodium (60 mg/kg i.p.), and supplemental doses of anesthesia were administered as needed. At the end of the experimental protocols, animals were killed by pentobarbital sodium overdose.

Muscle preparation

All experimental techniques, including the spinotrapezius muscle preparation, were performed, as described previously (Sonobe et al. 2008; Eshima et al. 2013). Briefly, the right spinotrapezius muscle was gently exteriorized with minimal blood loss and tissue/microcirculatory damage, and attached to a wire horseshoe around the caudal periphery by six equidistant sutures placed around the muscle perimeter. The exposed muscle tissue was kept moist by superfusing with warmed Krebs–Henseleit buffer (KHB; 132 mmol/L NaCl, 4.7 mmol/L KCl, 21.8 mmol/L NaHCO3, 2.0 mmol/L MgSO4, and 2.0 mmol/L CaCl2) equilibrated with 95% N2‐5% CO2 and adjusted to pH 7.4, at 37°C. The fluorescent Ca2+ indicator Fura‐2 AM (5 mmol/L; Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and Pluronic F‐127 and dispersed into KHB solution at a final concentration of 40 μmol/L. The muscles were incubated in Fura‐2 AM/KHB solution for 60 min on a 37°C hot plate (Kitazato Supply, Shizuoka, Japan). After incubation, muscles were rinsed with dye‐free KHB solution to remove nonloaded Fura‐2 AM.

In vivo image analysis

The spinotrapezius muscles loaded with Fura‐2 AM were mounted on the 37°C glass hot plate and observed by fluorescence microscopy using a 10 × objective lens (0.30 numerical aperture; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). After ensuring that the spinotrapezius muscle was not grossly damaged and supported robust capillary blood flow, a sampling area (~880 × 663 μm) was selected, and bright‐field images were captured. Thereafter, 340 and 380 nm wavelength excitation light was delivered using a Xenon lamp equipped with appropriate fluorescent filters, and pairs of fluorescence images were captured through the 510 nm emission wavelength filter for ratiometry (Roe et al. 1990). The fluorescence intensity of serial ratio images was normalized to the starting point (i.e., precondition, R0) of each experiment (R/R0).

Experimental Protocols

In vivo injection of Ca2+ solution

Capillary micropipettes were generated with a tip of 5 μm in diameter, which was achieved by custom grinding and inserted into the selected single muscle fiber using a micromanipulator precision‐controlled advancer (MMO‐220A; Narishige, Tokyo, Japan). Subsequently, using a microinjector (IM300; Narishige, Tokyo, Japan), a single muscle fiber was microinjected with 0.02, 0.2, and 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ solution by microinjection at 35 psi (24,000 Pa) for 1 sec (~0.78 × 10−3 μL) (Tanaka et al. 2016). We used a piezoassisted micromanipulation system for perforation of the cell membrane (PiezoXpert; Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The injection solution was adjusted using a mixture of Ca2+‐free solution (KCl: 145 mmol/L, NaCl: 3.5 mmol/L, MgCl2: 10 mmol/L,NaOH: 6.5 mmol/L, HEPES: 10 mmol/L) and the Ca2+ solution (CaCl2・2H2O: 10 mmol/L). Criteria for successful injection included an unchanged [Ca2+]i in adjacent muscle fibers. Fluorescence images were captured by a high‐sensitivity CCD (charge‐coupled device) digital camera (ORCA‐Flash2.8; Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) using image‐capture software (NIS‐Elements Advanced Research; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) for 60 sec after injection. The scan requirements were set at 300–800 msec/image. We confirmed that insertion of the capillary micropipette itself and injection of Ca2+‐free solution did not induce any [Ca2+]i change. The specific region of interest (ROI, width: 20 μm, height: 80% of muscle fiber diameter) for the Ca2+ measurement was set at a distance of 40 μm from the injection point. All experiments were performed with the rat's body temperature maintained at 37–38°C with the exteriorized muscles mounted on the 37°C glass hotplate.

Pharmacologic block of the SR function

Pharmacological agents DAN and CPA were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). DAN inhibits single ryanodine receptor (RyR) Ca2+ release channels (Kobayashi et al. 2005; Oo et al. 2015). CPA is a highly specific and potent SERCA inhibitor (Seidler et al. 1989). Each inhibitor was dissolved in DMSO and diluted with KHB (DAN: 100 and 500 μmol/L, CPA: 10, 50, and 100 μmol/L) and the pharmacological action was confirmed by constructing dose–response curves. Based upon these studies, following Fura‐2 incubation and rinse, DAN (100 μmol/L) or CPA (100 μmol/L) was applied for 5 min before the start of experiments. Subsequently, a single muscle fiber was microinjected with either of the 0.02, 0.2, and 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ solution.

In vivo injection of caffeine solution

This protocol was the same as for the Ca2+ injection. The caffeine solution (100 μmol/L) was injected into each single muscle fiber both with and without DAN conditions.

Evaluation of the muscle fiber length

The muscle fiber shortening (i.e., contraction rate) was calculated frame‐by‐frame using autologous fluorescent landmarks, located close to the injection point and thus ~40 μm from the ROI. The resolution was 0.73 μm per pixel.

Statistical analysis

All experimental data are expressed as means ± SE. All statistical analyses were performed in Prism version 6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Comparisons among different groups were analyzed by either one‐way or two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test. The level of significance was set at < 0.05 (two‐tailed).

Results

In contrast to the Ca2+‐free and 0.02 mmol/L Ca2+ injections which caused no detectable [Ca2+]i change, 0.2 and 2.0 mmol/L injections elicited significant increases in [Ca2+]i, indicated by 9.9 ± 1.8% and 23.8 ± 4.3% increases in R/R0 within 1–2 sec after injection, respectively (both < 0.0001, two‐way ANOVA, Figs. 1, ,2).2). Interestingly, the [Ca2+]i increase declined subsequently but [Ca2+]i did not return to resting levels within the 60 sec observation period.

Figure 1
Representative example of changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) induced by 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ microinjection into a single rat spinotrapezius muscle myocyte. The injection site is shown with an arrow. The specific region of interest ...
Figure 2
Influence of the different Ca2+ injections (0.02, 0.2 2.0 mmol/L) on intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in vivo. Fluorescence was measured continuously during the 60 sec measurement interval and ratiometrically quantified ...

The functional concentrations of each inhibitor (DAN and CPA) were verified under in vivo conditions before Ca2+ injection (Fig. 3A). As evident from Figure 3B, the increment of [Ca2+]i with Ca2+ injection was barely detectable after DAN treatment (2.0 mmol/L: 3.4 ± 1.2%, 0.2 mmol/L: 3.6 ± 0.8%, 0.02 mmol/L: 1.9 ± 0.7% vs. unblocked control). With CPA‐induced SERCA blockade, the [Ca2+]i increase after injection was substantially blunted compared with the unblocked control condition (i.e., control 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ injection, 23.8 ± 4.3% vs. CPA, 5.3 ± 1.0%, P < 0.05).

Figure 3
(A) The dose–response curves show the pharmacologic function of DAN (100, 500 μmol/L) and CPA (10, 50, 100 μmol/L) in the in vivo environment. (B) Influence of the DAN, top panel and CPA, bottom panel in vivo ...

Caffeine injection induced a 13.8 ± 2.6% [Ca2+]i increase above baseline (Fig. 4). Unlike the 0.2 mmol/L and 2.0 mmol/L injectates, this [Ca2+]i increase resolved to baseline within 60 sec (compare Figs. 2, ,4).4). DAN blockade of RyR almost completely abolished the caffeine‐induced [Ca2+]i increase (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
Influence of caffeine injection with/without DAN in vivo on intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i). Values shown are means ± SE (caffeine condition: N = 5, n = 9, caffeine/DAN condition: ...

2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ injection induced a rapid (peak velocity, 43.0 ± 11.0 μm/sec) and substantial (peak shortening length, 89.5 ± 15.1 μm, mean shortening length 48.0 ± 7.7 μm) fiber shortening as seen in Figure 5. Two‐way repeated‐measures analyses revealed a significant effect for DAN (< 0.03, vs. Ca2+ alone condition) and CPA (< 0.03, vs. Ca2+ alone condition) on shortening fiber length. Specifically, the mean shortening length was significantly reduced in both DAN (25.1 ± 6.6 μm) and CPA (14.4 ± 4.0 μm) compared with 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ alone (Fig. 5D).

Figure 5
(A) Changes of muscle fiber length (i.e., extent of shortening) during each injection protocol (Ca2+, Ca2++DAN, Ca2++CPA, and caffeine). Values shown are means ± SE (Ca2+: n = 12, Ca2++DAN: n = 14 ...

For the caffeine condition, compared with the 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ injection, there was a strong tendency for a reduced shortening (22.9 ± 4.6 μm, = 0.059, Fig. 5D) and a slower velocity of shortening (16.3 ± 2.5 μm/sec, = 0.060, Fig. 5C).

Discussion

This investigation represents the first in vivo imaging of [Ca2+]i dynamics associated with direct single fiber Ca2+ loading in an in vivo skeletal muscle of rats. The principal original finding was that the [Ca2+]i dynamics following Ca2+ injection reflect Ca2+ released by SOICR rather than the effects of the injected Ca2+ itself. This schema is supported by the almost complete abolition of [Ca2+]i increase consequent to RyR and SERCA inhibition.

[Ca2+]i response to Ca2+ injection

In the absence of intramyocyte (e.g., troponin) Ca2+ binding as well as SR release and sequestration processes the change in [Ca2+]i should directly reflect the amount of injected Ca2+ within the cytoplasmic distribution volume. For instance, in a myocyte that has a 60 μm diameter and length 700 μm, the volume will be approximately 2.0 × 10−3 μL. When 0.78 × 10−3 μL of 0.02, 0.2, and 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ solution was injected, it is estimated that the [Ca2+]i will increase to 0.0057, 0.057, and 0.57 mmol/L, respectively. As can be seen from Figures 2 and and3,3, however, there was no proportional relationship between injected [Ca2+] and the resultant rise in [Ca2+]i, providing evidence for the presence of a complex Ca2+ homeostasis system. That the 0.02 mmol/L injection did not elevate [Ca2+]i indicates that either any [Ca2+]i increase was below the sensitivity of our detection system or, alternatively, the injected Ca2+ was removed by Ca2+‐troponin binding and/or sequestration processes by SR and mitochondria. In contrast, both 0.2 mmol/L and 2.0 mmol/L injections invoked a rapid and substantial increase in [Ca2+]i (Fig. 2) that was almost entirely prevented by either RyR (DAN) or SERCA (CPA) inhibition (Fig. (Fig.3).3). This observation provides strong evidence that a functional and robust SOICR is present in rat myocytes in vivo.

Ca2+ itself modulates RyR channel activity (Gehlert et al. 2015) being stimulatory at low Ca2+ (~1 μmol/L) and inhibitory at extremely high Ca2+ (~1 mmol/L) (Meissner 1986). DAN inhibits skeletal muscle L‐type Ca2+ currents by disrupting communication between RyR1 and Ca(V)1 which provides the only treatment for malignant hyperthermia resulting from RyR1 mutations (Zhao et al. 2001; Bannister 2013). Although the precise molecular mechanism(s) for DAN's RyR1 functional action remain to be defined (Nelson et al. 1996; Oo et al. 2015), discrete findings within isolated muscle and skinned muscle fibers offer pertinent clues. For instance, in E–C coupling, DAN diminishes the twitch tension much more than the tetanic tension (Leslie and Part 1981) and both reduced temperatures (22°C) (Ohta et al. 1990; Krause et al. 2004; Kobayashi et al. 2005) and the presence of Mg2+ (Ohta et al. 1990; Owen et al. 1997) impair DAN's ability to inhibit RyR1. Unfortunately, as mentioned in the Introduction, in vitro conditions present in those investigations are expected, in and of themselves, to perturb [Ca2+]i and RyR regulation. Specifically, RyR is a redox‐sensitive channel and myocyte redox regulation is dependent on O2 (and thus O2 partial pressure, PO2) (Salama et al. 2000; Powers et al. 2011). Although physiological microvascular PO2 are 20–30 Torr in the in vivo spinotrapezius muscle (Kano et al. 2005) and intramyocyte PO2 must be even lower, studies of isolated skeletal muscles are routinely performed in hyperoxic environments (95% O2, >600 Torr). This realization tempers confidence in translating ex vivo findings to the in vivo environment. Notwithstanding this consideration, the present investigation has extended previous observations regarding [Ca2+]i control and represents the first investigation to provide evidence for SOICR function in vivo.

The effects of RyR and SERCA inhibition on the [Ca2+]i response and contractile function

We hypothesized that SOICR function would be abolished when Ca2+ release from the SR is inhibited, either directly via the blockade of RyR (DAN), or indirectly via the depletion of Ca2+ from the SR (CPA). This hypothesis was supported by the almost complete abolition of [Ca2+]i increases by DAN and CPA applied separately.

SOICR has been observed in RyR2 containing cardiomyocytes (Diaz et al. 1997; Eisner et al. 2009) and occurs consequent to RyR opening when the stored Ca2+ content exceeds some threshold level. SOICR has been observed for RYR1 in skeletal muscle myocytes as well as RyR3 in smooth muscle (Chen et al. 2014). As we added an additional Ca2+ load to the myocytes, we considered this to be the basis for triggering SOICR. Recently, Cully and colleague observed in rodent skinned fibers that a local [Ca2+]i increase via SOICR was propagated by movement of Ca2+ inside the SR (Cully et al. 2014). A similar phenomenon was identified in rabbit ventricular myocytes where local SR Ca2+ uptake by SERCA facilitated propagation of cytosolic Ca2+ waves via luminal sensitization of the RyR (Maxwell and Blatter 2012). These cytoplasmic Ca2+ waves can be explained by discrete fluctuations of Ca2+ inside the SR network. In the present investigation, we have demonstrated that, following injection of 0.2 and 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ solution, pharmacologic inhibition of SR Ca2+ release by DAN and uptake by CPA largely, but not totally, prevented subsequent [Ca2+]i increase (Fig. 3, lower panel). As injected Ca2+ would be instantly sequestered by SERCA, when allowed to function normally (i.e., absence of CPA) this would acutely increase net SR Ca2+ stores. Consequently, local Ca2+ release following Ca2+ injection would be triggered by the SOICR system and contribute to the contractile behavior evident in Figure 5. Interestingly, even in the presence of DAN or CPA 40–60% of the control muscle contractile response (extent of shortening and shortening velocity) was preserved. The most likely explanation for this behavior is that the injected Ca2+ bound immediately to troponin and directly facilitated contraction.

Consideration of the experimental model

We examined Ca2+ release with caffeine to confirm the physiological response of the in vivo experimental model. Caffeine increases the sensitivity of RyR for Ca2+ (Rousseau et al. 1988; Zucchi and Ronca‐Testoni 1997; Murayama et al. 2000) and caffeine‐induced Ca2+ transients are evident in myotubes and adult skeletal muscle (Endo et al. 1970; Horiuti 1988; Lamb et al. 2001). In this study, under the in vivo control condition, there was a significant increase in [Ca2+]i after caffeine injection, and this was markedly attenuated by DAN (Fig. 4). That Ca2+ release by caffeine could be inhibited by DAN provides additional evidence that the Ca2+ release via SR is present and functional in vivo. Also, the muscle contraction induced by caffeine injection is most likely the result of RyR‐released Ca2+. The peak shortening velocity and extent of fiber shortening with caffeine tended to be slower and reduced compared with the control Ca2+ condition (P = 0.06, Fig. 5 panel C) which might be associated with inertia in the Ca2+ release system resulting from caffeine‐induced RyR sensitization. Under these circumstances, it would be expected that the SOICR Ca2+ release rate would be far slower than VICR. However, resolution of the mechanistic basis for this behavior will require more precise temporal measurements of the contractile response than attempted, or possible, herein.

The [Ca2+]i in mammalian myocyte is around 20–50 nmol/L under resting conditions, while the peak [Ca2+]i increases to the low μmol/L level during tetanic stimulation (Allen and Westerblad 2001). Computational modeling estimates that the total released SR Ca2+ is around 0.35 mmol/L during tetanic stimulation in intact fast‐twitch mouse myocytes (Baylor and Hollingworth 2003). It is quite possible therefore that the local injection of 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ may be beyond the range seen physiologically. Although highly concentrated Ca2+ (~1 mmol/L) has been shown to inhibit rather than facilitate RyR function (Meissner 1986), the present results clearly demonstrate facilitation of RyR Ca2+ release. Therefore, even though we elected to inject 2.0 mmol/L Ca2+ the volume was extremely small (0.78 nL) and the resultant free [Ca2+]i is expected to be reduced immediately by intramyocyte buffering mechanisms and dilution within the far larger cytosolic volume.

Mg2+, Zn2+, NO, and ATP are known modulators of the RyR function (Xia et al. 2000; Lanner et al. 2010; Suhr et al. 2013) and perturbations in the concentrations of these molecules, and therefore Ca2+ regulation, is inevitable when the in vivo myocyte environment is lost. For instance, the ATP requirement for the SR Ca2+ pumping, required to maintain Ca2+ homeostasis, demands up to 40–50% of resting cellular energy consumption (Smith et al. 2013). Even if it is possible to provide sufficient O2 in vitro to sustain this activity disruption of the intracellular PO2 (by hyperoxia and/or hypoxia) will invariably alter metabolic regulation, intramyocyte redox and the intramyocyte milieu (e.g., (Hogan et al. 1992; Wilson et al. 1977). This consideration demands careful interpretation of in vitro data when applying them to in vivo physiological mechanisms and is especially pertinent for understanding in vivo muscle Ca2+ homeostasis. A signatory advantage of the present investigation is having a preparation that maintains close‐to‐physiological intramyocyte homeostasis especially as regards ion balance and energy supply.

In conclusion, in the absence of VICR, we demonstrated, for the first time, evidence for SR SOICR in in vivo single mammalian skeletal muscle myocytes. The SOICR demonstrated induced elevated [Ca2+]i and significant myocyte shortening; both of which were diminished substantially by RyR blockade or SERCA inhibition.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Notes

Wakizaka M., Eshima H., Tanaka Y., Shirakawa H., Poole D. C., Kano Y.. In vivo Ca2+ dynamics induced by Ca2+ injection in individual rat skeletal muscle fibers, Physiol Rep, 5 (5), 2017, e13180, doi: 10.14814/phy2.13180

Notes

Funding Information

This study was supported in part by Grant‐in–Aid for Scientific Research from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 22300221, 2365043 and 16H03240) and The Nakatomi Foundation.

References

  • Allen D. G., and Westerblad H.. 2001. Role of phosphate and calcium stores in muscle fatigue. J. Physiol. 536:657–665. [PubMed]
  • Bannister R. A. 2013. Dantrolene‐induced inhibition of skeletal L‐type Ca2+ current requires RyR1 expression. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013:390493. [PubMed]
  • Baylor S. M., and Hollingworth S.. 2003. Sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release compared in slow‐twitch and fast‐twitch fibres of mouse muscle. J. Physiol. 551:125–138. [PubMed]
  • Beam K. G., and Bannister R. A.. 2010. Looking for answers to EC coupling's persistent questions. J. Gen. Physiol. 136:7–12. [PubMed]
  • Capes E. M., Loaiza R., and Valdivia H. H.. 2011. Ryanodine receptors. Skelet. Muscle 1:18. [PubMed]
  • Chen W., Wang R., Chen B., Zhong X., Kong H., Bai Y., et al. 2014. The ryanodine receptor store‐sensing gate controls Ca2+ waves and Ca2+‐triggered arrhythmias. Nat. Med. 20:184–192. [PubMed]
  • Cully T. R., Edwards J. N., and Launikonis B. S.. 2014. Activation and propagation of Ca2+ release from inside the sarcoplasmic reticulum network of mammalian skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 592:3727–3746. [PubMed]
  • Diaz M. E., Trafford A. W., O'Neill S. C., and Eisner D. A.. 1997. Measurement of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ content and sarcolemmal Ca2+ fluxes in isolated rat ventricular myocytes during spontaneous Ca2+ release. J. Physiol. 501:3–16. [PubMed]
  • Eisner D. A., Kashimura T., Venetucci L. A., and Trafford A. W.. 2009. From the ryanodine receptor to cardiac arrhythmias. Circ. J. 73:1561–1567. [PubMed]
  • Endo M. 2009. Calcium‐induced calcium release in skeletal muscle. Physiol. Rev. 89:1153–1176. [PubMed]
  • Endo M., Tanaka M., and Ogawa Y.. 1970. Calcium induced release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum of skinned skeletal muscle fibres. Nature 228:34–36. [PubMed]
  • Eshima H., Tanaka Y., Sonobe T., Inagaki T., Nakajima T., Poole D. C., et al. 2013. In vivo imaging of intracellular Ca2+ after muscle contractions and direct Ca2+ injection in rat skeletal muscle in diabetes. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 305:R610–R618. [PubMed]
  • Fabiato A. 1992. 2 Kinds of calcium‐induced release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum of skinned cardiac cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 311:245–262. [PubMed]
  • Figueroa L., Shkryl V. M., Zhou J., Manno C., Momotake A., Brum G., et al. 2012. Synthetic localized calcium transients directly probe signalling mechanisms in skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 590:1389–1411. [PubMed]
  • Fill M., and Copello J. A.. 2002. Ryanodine receptor calcium release channels. Physiol. Rev. 82:893–922. [PubMed]
  • Flucher B. E., Conti A., Takeshima H., and Sorrentino V.. 1999. Type 3 and type 1 ryanodine receptors are localized in triads of the same mammalian skeletal muscle fibers. J. Cell Biol. 146:621–630. [PubMed]
  • Gehlert S., Bloch W., and Suhr F.. 2015. Ca2+‐dependent regulations and signaling in skeletal muscle: from electro‐mechanical coupling to adaptation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16:1066–1095. [PubMed]
  • Giannini G., Conti A., Mammarella S., Scrobogna M., and Sorrentino V.. 1995. The ryanodine receptor/calcium channel genes are widely and differentially expressed in marine brain and peripheral tissues. J. Cell Biol. 128:893–904. [PubMed]
  • Hernandez‐Ochoa E. O., Pratt S. J., Lovering R. M., and Schneider M. F.. 2015. Critical role of intracellular RyR1 calcium release channels in skeletal muscle function and disease. Front. Physiol. 6:420. [PubMed]
  • Hogan M. C., Arthur P. G., Bebout D. E., Hochachka P. W., and Wagner P. D.. 1992. Role of O2 in regulating tissue respiration in dog muscle working in situ. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 728–736. [PubMed]
  • Horiuti K. 1988. Mechanism of contracture on cooling of caffeine‐treated frog skeletal muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 398:131–148. [PubMed]
  • Kano Y., Padilla D. J., Behnke B. J., Hageman K. S., Musch T. I., and Poole D. C.. 2005. Effects of eccentric exercise on microcirculation and microvascular oxygen pressures in rat spinotrapezius muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 99:1516–1522. [PubMed]
  • Klein M. G., and Schneider M. F.. 2006. Ca2+ sparks in skeletal muscle. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 92:308–332. [PubMed]
  • Kobayashi S., Bannister M. L., Gangopadhyay J. P., Hamada T., Parness J., and Ikemoto N.. 2005. Dantrolene stabilizes domain interactions within the ryanodine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 280:6580–6587. [PubMed]
  • Kong H. H., Wang R. W., Chen W. Q., Zhang L., Chen K. Y., Shimoni Y., et al. 2007. Skeletal and cardiac ryanodine receptors exhibit different responses to Ca2+ overload and luminal Ca2+ . Biophys. J. 92:2757–2770. [PubMed]
  • Krause T., Gerbershagen M. U., Fiege M., Weisshorn R., and Wappler F.. 2004. Dantrolene–a review of its pharmacology, therapeutic use and new developments. Anaesthesia 59:364–373. [PubMed]
  • Lamb G. D., Cellini M. A., and Stephenson D. G.. 2001. Different Ca2+ releasing action of caffeine and depolarisation in skeletal muscle fibres of the rat. J. Physiol. 531:715–728. [PubMed]
  • Lanner J. T., Georgiou D. K., Joshi A. D., and Hamilton S. L.. 2010. Ryanodine receptors: structure, expression, molecular details, and function in calcium release. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2:a003996. [PubMed]
  • Laver D. R., Eager K. R., Taoube L., and Lamb G. D.. 2000. Effects of cytoplasmic and luminal pH on Ca2+ release channels from rabbit skeletal muscle. Biophys. J. 78:1835–1851. [PubMed]
  • Leslie G. C., and Part N. J.. 1981. The action of dantrolene sodium on rat fast and slow muscle in vivo. Br. J. Pharmacol. 72:665–672. [PubMed]
  • Maack C., and O'Rourke B.. 2007. Excitation‐contraction coupling and mitochondrial energetics. Basic Res. Cardiol. 102:369–392. [PubMed]
  • Maxwell J. T., and Blatter L. A.. 2012. Facilitation of cytosolic calcium wave propagation by local calcium uptake into the sarcoplasmic reticulum in cardiac myocytes. J. Physiol. 590:6037–6045. [PubMed]
  • Meissner G. 1986. Ryanodine activation and inhibition of the Ca2+ release channel of sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 261:6300–6306. [PubMed]
  • Murayama T., Kurebayashi N., and Ogawa Y.. 2000. Role of Mg2+ in Ca2+‐induced Ca2+ release through ryanodine receptors of frog skeletal muscle: modulations by adenine nucleotides and caffeine. Biophys. J. 78:1810–1824. [PubMed]
  • Nakai J., Imagawa T., Hakamat Y., Shigekawa M., Takeshima H., and Numa S.. 1990. Primary structure and functional expression from cDNA of the cardiac ryanodine receptor/calcium release channel. FEBS Lett. 271:169–177. [PubMed]
  • Nelson T. E., Lin M., Zapata‐Sudo G., and Sudo R. T.. 1996. Dantrolene sodium can increase or attenuate activity of skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor calcium release channel. Clinical implications. Anesthesiology 84:1368–1379. [PubMed]
  • Ohta T., Ito S., and Ohga A.. 1990. Inhibitory action of dantrolene on Ca2+‐induced Ca2+ release from sarcoplasmic reticulum in guinea pig skeletal muscle. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 178:11–19. [PubMed]
  • Oo Y. W., Gomez‐Hurtado N., Walweel K., van Helden D. F., Imtiaz M. S., Knollmann B. C., et al. 2015. Essential role of calmodulin in RyR inhibition by dantrolene. Mol. Pharmacol. 88:57–63. [PubMed]
  • Otsu K., Willard H. F., Khanna V. K., Zorzato F., Green N. M., and MacLennan D. H.. 1990. Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding the Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) of rabbit cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 265:13472–13483. [PubMed]
  • Owen V. J., Taske N. L., and Lamb G. D.. 1997. Reduced Mg2+ inhibition of Ca2+ release in muscle fibers of pigs susceptible to malignant hyperthermia. Am. J. Physiol. 272:C203–C211. [PubMed]
  • Pouvreau S., Royer L., Yi J., Brum G., Meissner G., Rios E., et al. 2007. Ca2+ sparks operated by membrane depolarization require isoform 3 ryanodine receptor channels in skeletal muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:5235–5240. [PubMed]
  • Powers S. K., Ji L. L., Kavazis A. N., and Jackson M. J.. 2011. Reactive oxygen species: impact on skeletal muscle. Compr. Physiol. 1:941–969. [PubMed]
  • Prakriya M., and Lewis R. S.. 2015. Store‐operated calcium channels. Physiol. Rev. 95:1383–1436. [PubMed]
  • Roe M. W., Lemasters J. J., and Herman B.. 1990. Assessment of Fura‐2 for measurements of cytosolic free calcium. Cell Calcium 11:63–73. [PubMed]
  • Rousseau E., Ladine J., Liu Q. Y., and Meissner G.. 1988. Activation of the Ca2+ release channel of skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum by caffeine and related compounds. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 267:75–86. [PubMed]
  • Salama G., Menshikova E. V., and Abramson J. J.. 2000. Molecular interaction between nitric oxide and ryanodine receptors of skeletal and cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2:5–16. [PubMed]
  • Schneider M. F. 1994. Control of calcium release in functioning skeletal muscle fibers. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 56:463–484. [PubMed]
  • Seidler N. W., Jona I., Vegh M., and Martonosi A.. 1989. Cyclopiazonic acid is a specific inhibitor of the Ca2+‐ATPase of sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 264:17816–17823. [PubMed]
  • Smith I. C., Bombardier E., Vigna C., and Tupling A. R.. 2013. ATP consumption by sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ pumps accounts for 40‐50% of resting metabolic rate in mouse fast and slow twitch skeletal muscle. PLoS ONE 8:e68924. [PubMed]
  • Sonobe T., Inagaki T., Poole D. C., and Kano Y.. 2008. Intracellular calcium accumulation following eccentric contractions in rat skeletal muscle in vivo: role of stretch‐activated channels. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 294:R1329–R1337. [PubMed]
  • Stiber J., Hawkins A., Zhang Z. S., Wang S., Burch J., Graham V., et al. 2008. STIM1 signalling controls store‐operated calcium entry required for development and contractile function in skeletal muscle. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:688–697. [PubMed]
  • Suhr F., Gehlert S., Grau M., and Bloch W.. 2013. Skeletal muscle function during exercise‐fine‐tuning of diverse subsystems by nitric oxide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14:7109–7139. [PubMed]
  • Tanaka Y., Inagaki T., Poole D. C., and Kano Y.. 2016. pH buffering of single rat skeletal muscle fibers in the in vivo environment. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 310:R926–R933. [PubMed]
  • Van Petegem F. 2012. Ryanodine receptors: structure and function. J. Biol. Chem. 287:31624–31632. [PubMed]
  • Wilson D. F., Erecinska M., Drown C., and Silver I. A.. 1977. Effect of oxygen tension on cellular energetics. Am. J. Physiol. 233:C135–C140. [PubMed]
  • Xia R. H., Cheng X. Y., Wang H., Chen K. Y., Wei Q. Q., Zhang X. H., et al. 2000. Biphasic modulation of ryanodine binding to sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles of skeletal muscle by Zn2+ ions. Biochem. J. 345(Pt 2):279–286. [PubMed]
  • Zhao F., Li P., Chen S. R., Louis C. F., and Fruen B. R.. 2001. Dantrolene inhibition of ryanodine receptor Ca2+ release channels. Molecular mechanism and isoform selectivity. J. Biol. Chem. 276:13810–13816. [PubMed]
  • Zhou J., Launikonis B. S., Rios E., and Brum G.. 2004. Regulation of Ca2+ sparks by Ca2+ and Mg2+ in mammalian and amphibian muscle. An RyR isoform‐specific role in excitation‐contraction coupling? J. Gen. Physiol. 124:409–428. [PubMed]
  • Zorzato F., Fujii J., Otsu K., Phillips M., Green N. M., Lai F. A., et al. 1990. Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding human and rabbit forms of the Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) of skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 265:2244–2256. [PubMed]
  • Zucchi R., and Ronca‐Testoni S.. 1997. The sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ channel/ryanodine receptor: modulation by endogenous effectors, drugs and disease states. Pharmacol. Rev. 49:1–51. [PubMed]

Articles from Physiological Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley-Blackwell