PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of oncotargetLink to Publisher's site
 
Oncotarget. 2016 December 27; 7(52): 86186–86197.
Published online 2016 November 15. doi:  10.18632/oncotarget.13364
PMCID: PMC5349906

NT1721, a novel epidithiodiketopiperazine, exhibits potent in vitro and in vivo efficacy against acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by heterogeneous genetic and epigenetic changes in hematopoietic progenitors that lead to abnormal self-renewal and proliferation. Despite high initial remission rates, prognosis remains poor for most AML patients, especially for those harboring internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations in the fms-related tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3). Here, we report that a novel epidithiodiketopiperazine, NT1721, potently decreased the cell viability of FLT3-ITD+ AML cell lines, displaying IC50 values in the low nanomolar range, while leaving normal CD34+ bone marrow cells largely unaffected. The IC50 values for NT1721 were significantly lower than those for clinically used AML drugs (i.e. cytarabine, sorafenib) in all tested AML cell lines regardless of their FLT3 mutation status. Moreover, combinations of NT1721 with sorafenib or cytarabine showed better antileukemic effects than the single agents in vitro. Combining cytarabine with NT1721 also attenuated the cytarabine-induced FLT3 ligand surge that has been linked to resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Mechanistically, NT1721 depleted DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) protein levels, leading to the re-expression of silenced tumor suppressor genes and apoptosis induction. NT1721 concomitantly decreased the expression of EZH2 and BMI1, two genes that are associated with the maintenance of leukemic stem/progenitor cells. In a systemic FLT3-ITD+ AML mouse model, treatment with NT1721 reduced tumor burdens by > 95% compared to the control and significantly increased survival times. Taken together, our results suggest that NT1721 may represent a promising novel agent for the treatment of AML.

Keywords: ETP, FLT3-ITD, DNMT1, BMI1, FLT3 ligand

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive, extremely heterogeneous cancer associated with genetic and epigenetic changes that result in increased self-renewal ability, proliferation and impaired differentiation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells [1]. It is the most common type of leukemia in adults, accounting for ~30% of leukemias and > 40% of leukemia-related deaths [2]. The efficacy of the standard treatment, i.e. remission induction chemotherapy with an anthracycline/cytarabine combination followed by either consolidation chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations, is limited; 10–40% of patients do not respond to induction therapy and 50–70% of patients achieving complete remission are expected to relapse within 3 years [3, 4]. The prognosis for AML patients with FLT3-ITD mutations is especially poor: FLT3-ITD mutations are detectable in ~30% of AML patients and are associated with increased resistance to cytarabine, higher relapse rates and shorter median survival times [58]. FLT3-ITD mutations cause constitutive FLT3 activation, leading to aberrant signals that promote cell growth and inhibit apoptosis [2]. Recognition of FLT3 mutations as one of the key drivers of AML led to the development and clinical evaluation of several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Despite promising initial antileukemic activity of several FLT3 inhibitors in preclinical and clinical studies, none has been approved for routine clinical use in AML [9]. While recent studies show that adding FLT3 inhibitors to conventional chemotherapy can improve the clinical outcome [10, 11], responses to monotherapy with TKIs have only been incomplete or transient in the majority of patients treated with a single agent TKI due to rapidly developing drug resistance [1, 2, 6, 12]. Mechanisms of TKI resistance include the emergence of new mutations and bone marrow stroma-mediated protective effects, which result in cell cycle arrest rather than apoptosis of AML cells [12, 13]. Moreover, exposure to chemotherapy drugs such as cytarabine leads to a surge in FLT3 ligand (FLT3LG) expression in AML cells and stroma, which increases IC50 values for TKIs in vitro and attenuates the efficacy of TKIs in vivo [8, 1416]. Furthermore, reports show that CD34+/CD38 leukemia stem cells are highly drug resistant, which at least partially accounts for the high relapse rate in AML [17, 18]. Given the evident lack of effective treatment options for relapsed or refractory AML, there is urgent need to developnovel therapies for AML.

Epidithiodiketopiperazines (ETPs) are a broad class of fungal metabolites that display potent antibiotic and cytostatic/cytotoxic activities [19]. Various molecular mechanisms have been proposed explaining the biological activity of ETPs, e.g. (I) enzyme inhibition through ETP conjugation with cysteine residues, (II) ejection of a structurally important zinc ion from a transcription factor, (III) increased levels of cellular reactive oxygen species through competitive inhibition of thioredoxin reductase, (IV) inhibition of heat shock protein 90 through induction of a conformational change [2023]. To date, chaetocin is by far the most widely investigated ETP with anticancer activity in solid tumors and hematological malignancies [2426]. Chaetocin was the first reported specific S-Adenosyl-methionine (SAM)-competitive inhibitor of the histone methyltransferase SUV39H1 [27], gaining much attention since deregulated epigenetic modifiers such as histone methyltransferases (HMTs) and DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) have recently emerged as promising new drug targets [28]. SUV39H1 inhibition with chaetocin or RNAi-mediated SUV39H1 knockdown led to reduced tri-methylation of lysine 9 in histone 3 (H3K9me3), re-expression of silenced tumor suppressor genes and apoptosis induction in vitro and reduced tumor growth in vivo [26, 29]. Recently chaetocin has also been shown to not only reduce H3K9me3 levels, but also tri-methylation of lysine 27 in histone 3 (H3K27me3) in AML cell lines [30]. Tri-methylation of H3K27 is catalyzed by EZH2, the HMT in the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which also controls DNA methylation through its interaction with DNMTs [31]. Deregulation of both EZH2 and DNMTs has been reported in AML, resulting in histone and DNA hypermethylation and consequently aberrant silencing of tumor suppressor genes such as BIM and CDKN2B (p15) [32, 33].

Here, we report that a novel ETP, NT1721, possesses potent antileukemic activity, which is mediated by the depletion of epigenetic modifiers (DNMT1, EZH2, BMI1). NT1721 showed potent antileukemic effects as single agent and in combination with drugs currently used for AML treatment. Moreover, NT1721 was highly efficacious and well-tolerated in a systemic AML mouse model, highlighting its potential as novel agent for the treatment of AML.

RESULTS

NT1721 potently reduced the cell viability of AML cell lines and primary AML samples

UCI1406 was chosen for this study from a library of ETPs because of its potent antitumor activity in various tumor cell lines [34]. To determine the potency of the racemic mixture (UCI1406) and its enantiomers (NT1721 and NT1722, Figure Figure1A)1A) against AML we determined their IC50 values in Molm14 cells that were treated with the respective compounds for 48 h. Cells treated with NT1721 displayed a 9-fold lower IC50 value than cells treated with NT1722 (Table (Table1),1), indicating that NT1721 had better anti-leukemic properties than NT1722. Thus, NT1721 was used for all further experiments. To assess the effect of NT1721 on the viability of various AML cell lines, we treated FLT3-ITD cells (Molm14, MV4.11) and FLT3-WT cells (THP1, KG1a) with increasing concentrations of NT1721 (0.1 nM - 10 μM) and determined the IC50 values after 48 h. Molm14, MV4.11 and THP1 cells displayed IC50 values in the lower nanomolar range (Table (Table1).1). By contrast, the IC50 value was significantly higher (~ 8 μM) in KG1a leukemic stem-like cells, which reportedly possess many characteristics of leukemic stem cells, e.g. self-renewal capacity, resistance to chemotherapy and a CD34+/CD38 phenotype [35, 36]. Moreover, CD96 has also been identified as a leukemic stem cell-specific marker on AML CD34+/CD38 stem cells [37]. To confirm that KG1a cells display the immunophenotype associated with AML stem-like cells, we assessed the expression of CD34, CD38 and CD96 in KG1a cells; FACS analysis showed that 74% of KG1a cells were CD34+/CD38/CD96+ (Supplementary Figure S1A). CD96 was strongly expressed in the majority of KG1a cells while only weak CD96 expression was detected ~2% of CD38 Molm14 or normal CD34+ bone marrow cells. Taken together these data suggest that KG1a cells may be enriched for leukemic stem-like cells. We then compared the effect of NT1721 on the cell viability with that of drugs currently used for AML treatment, i.e. the standard remission induction drug, cytarabine, and sorafenib, a TKI that has been used in clinical trials in patients harboring FLT3-ITD mutations [38]. The IC50 values for cytarabine and sorafenib were 6 to 500-fold higher (depending on the cell line) than the IC50 values for NT1721 in both FLT3-ITD and FLT3-WT cell lines (Table (Table1).1). KG1a cells showed no response to 48 h-treatment with either 10 μM cytarabine or 10 μM sorafenib. When we extended the exposure time to 96 h, KG1a cells displayed an IC50 value of ~1 μM for NT1721, but still showed no significant change in viability after treatment with cytarabine or sorafenib (Table (Table1).1). The result was confirmed when we stained treated KG1a cells with annexin V to detect apoptotic cells; 40% of KG1a cells treated with 1 μM NT1721 were annexin V+ compared to 5–8% of cells treated with 10 μM sorafenib or 10 μM cytarabine (Supplementary Figure S1B). Taken together, these data indicate that NT1721 is more potent than either cytarabine or sorafenib in vitro.

Figure 1
Effect of NT1721 on the viability of primary AML samples and normal CD34+ bone marrow cells
Table 1
IC50 values in AML cell lines

We then tested the effect of NT1721 on primary AML samples (from AllCells, obtained from two newly diagnosed AML patients with white blood cell counts > 1011/L) by treating the samples with NT1721 for 48 h. The IC50 values for the primary AML peripheral blood and AML bone marrow sample (~10 nM and ~1 μM, respectively) were comparable to the IC50 values achieved in AML cell lines (Figure (Figure1B).1B). Moreover, NT1721 induced apoptosis as measured by the dose-dependent increase in annexin V-positive cells to 33% in the AML bone marrow sample treated with 1 μM NT1721 (Figure (Figure1C).1C). To assess the effect of NT1721 on normal cells we also treated normal CD34+ bone marrow cells with NT1721 for 48 h. This treatment had only a comparatively minor effect on their viability since 84% of the normal CD34+ bone marrow cells remained viable after exposure to 2.5 μM NT1721 for 48 h (Figure (Figure1).1). Taken together, our results with primary cells and AML cell lines suggest that NT1721 may preferentially decrease the viability of AML cells while leaving normal CD34+ bone marrow largely unaffected.

NT1721 enhances the cytotoxic effects of cytarabine or sorafenib in FLT3-ITD AML cells

To evaluate the cytotoxic effect of drug combinations of NT1721 with either cytarabine or sorafenib, we treated Molm14 cells with increasing concentrations of the single agents or drug combinations (NT1721-to-cytarabine ratio 1:100 and NT1721-to-sorafenib ratio 1:10) for 48 h. Calculation of the combination index (CI) revealed synergistic effects (CI < 1) for the combinations with cytarabine or sorafenib at the effective doses ED50, ED75 and ED90 (Table (Table22 and Supplementary Figure S2). At ED25, the combination with cytarabine displayed a CI < 1 while no synergy was observed for the combination with sorafenib. To further investigate the antileukemic effects of NT1721 and the drug combinations, we determined the effect of the single agents and drug combinations on apoptosis induction and cell cycle after 48 h exposure. As shown in Figure Figure2A,2A, treatment with NT1721 increased the percentage of annexin V+, apoptotic cells in a dose-dependent manner. Cells treated with drug combinations of NT1721 with cytarabine or sorafenib displayed higher percentages of apoptotic cells than cells treated with the single agents, suggesting that NT1721 may augment their antileukemic effect. The cell cycle analysis revealed that NT1721 increased the sub-G1 fraction in a dose-dependent manner and decreased the percentage of cells in the G1-, S- and G2 phase (Figure (Figure2B),2B), indicating that NT1721 did not only lead to cell cycle arrest, but induced cell death. As shown in Figure Figure2C,2C, cells treated with drug combinations displayed higher percentages of sub-G1 phase cells than the single agents, suggesting that NT1721 enhanced the effect of cytarabine and sorafenib.

Table 2
Calculation of the combination index (CI)
Figure 2
Drug combinations of NT1721 with cytarabine or sorafenib display better antileukemic properties than the single agents

High concentrations of NT1721 decreased H3K9me3 levels

Since NT1721 is structurally related to the known SUV39H1 inhibitor chaetocin, we tested first whether treatment with NT1721 altered the methylation status of H3K9 in Molm14 cells. As shown in Supplementary Figure S3, NT1721 only slightly decreased global H3K9me3 levels (by ~20%) at concentrations 10-fold higher than the IC50 value for Molm14. NT1721 also displayed a relatively high IC50 value of 1.3 μM when we tested its ability to inhibit the HMT activity of recombinant SUV39H1 in a cell-free assay (data not shown). These results suggest that the antileukemic effect of NT1721 is not primarily mediated by SUV39H1 inhibition.

NT1721 depleted EZH2, DNMT1, and BMI1 protein levels and induced the expression of tumor suppressor genes

Since chaetocin has been recently shown to reduce global H3K27me3 levels in AML cell lines [30], we investigated the effect of NT1721 on H3K27 methylation in Molm14 cells. Western blot analysis revealed that NT1721 led to a greater reduction in H3K27me3 levels than in H3K9me3 levels at low concentrations (Supplementary Figure S3). However, NT1721 had no direct inhibitory effect on the HMT activity of recombinant EZH2, the HMT catalyzing tri-methylation of H3K27 as measured in a cell-free assay (data not shown). We then investigated whether NT1721 influenced the expression level of EZH2. As shown in Figure Figure3A,3A, treating Molm14 cells with low nanomolar concentrations of NT1721 led to a significant, concentration-dependent decrease in EZH2 protein levels, thus providing an explanation for the decrease in H3K27me3 levels.

Figure 3
Treatment with NT1721 led to the depletion of DNMT1, EZH2 and BMI1 and induced the expression of tumor suppressor genes

To gain further insight in how NT1721 might exert its antileukemic activity we analyzed RNAseq data obtained from cells treated with NT1721; the analysis showed that NT1721 decreased the expression of several epigenetic regulators (i.e. DNMT1, DNMT3B and BMI1) that are linked to the silencing of tumor suppressors and the maintenance and self-renewal of leukemic stem cells [39]. We first verified the downregulation of DNMT1, DNMT3B and BMI1 in Molm14 cells treated with NT1721 by qPCR (Figure (Figure3B).3B). Western blot analysis then confirmed that treatment with NT1721 depleted DNMT1 and BMI1 protein levels in a dose-dependent manner (Figure (Figure3A).3A). Treatment with NT1721 at IC50 concentrations also greatly reduced DNMT1 (by > 60%) and BMI1 expression (by 70–85%) in the primary AML samples. We then investigated whether NT1721 influenced the expression of tumor suppressor genes since several reports have shown links between the downregulation of DNMT1, BMI1 and EZH2 and increased expression of tumor suppressor genes [4042]. Western blot and qPCR analysis showed that depletion of DNMT1, EZH2 and BMI1 was associated with a concomitant increase in the expression of tumor suppressor genes, i.e. CDKN2B (p15), BIM and CDKN2A (p16) (Figure 3C–3D). NT1721 also decreased the expression of the antiapoptotic protein BCL2 and the cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), which is essential for entry into the cell cycle and thus for cell proliferation, in a concentration-dependent manner (data not shown). This result is in agreement with previous reports showing that BMI1 knockdown decreased expression of CDK2 and BCL2 and reduced cell proliferation of various types of cancer [4345].

NT1721 decreased FLT3LG expression and attenuated cytarabine-induced FLT3LG upregulation

Analysis of the RNAseq data also revealed that FLT3 ligand (FLT3LG) expression was decreased in treated cells, which was confirmed by qPCR analysis in Molm14 cells (Figure (Figure4A).4A). Treatment with NT1721 at IC50 concentrations also reduced the FLT3LG expression by ~70% in the primary AML samples. Since the chemotherapy-induced FLT3LG surge is linked to drug resistance to TKIs [14, 16], we tested whether NT1721 could influence the cytarabine-induced FLT3LG upregulation. As shown in Figure Figure4B,4B, treatment with cytarabine increased FLT3LG mRNA levels and co-treatment with NT1721 attenuated the cytarabine-induced upregulation of FLT3LG in Molm14 cells. To confirm this result on the protein level we analyzed the FLT3LG expression by flow cytometry. NT1721 decreased the FLT3LG expression in a dose-dependent manner in FLT3-ITD+ Molm14 cells (Figure (Figure4C)4C) and FLT3-WT KG1a cells (Supplementary Figure S4), as evidenced by the decrease in FLT3LG+ cells and in the median fluorescence intensity (MFI). Co-treatment with NT1721 attenuated the cytarabine-induced increase in FLT3 expression (Figure (Figure4C4C).

Figure 4
NT1721 attenuated the cytarabine-induced FLT3LG upregulation

NT1721 showed potent antileukemic effects in a systemic FLT3-ITD mouse model

We first determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of NT1721 in NSG mice by administering 7.5 mg/kg, 15 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg of NT1721 by gavage. Daily doses up to 15 mg/kg were apparently well tolerated since no loss of body weight or other obvious signs of toxicity were observed. Mice receiving daily doses of 30 mg/kg of NT1721 displayed significant weight loss (> 15%) and diarrhea after 4 to 5 days of daily treatment. However, no significant weight loss was observed when the mice received 30 mg/kg of NT1721 on only 3 consecutive days per week, suggesting that this drug regimen was well tolerated (Supplementary Figure S5).

To evaluate the antileukemic activity of daily doses of NT1721 in vivo, we injected 106 luciferase-expressing (luc+) Molm14 cells into the tail vein of female NSG mice. Groups of mice bearing equal tumor burdens after 4 days were then treated daily with 7.5 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg of NT1721 by gavage; the control group received the vehicle control (30% Solutol/5% DMSO in PBS). As shown in Figure Figure5A5A and and5B,5B, treatment with NT1721 led to dose-dependent lower tumor burdens in treated mice compared to the control. The tumor burden in mice treated with 15 mg/kg of NT1721 was 70–80% lower than the tumor burden in the control group (days 10 and 16). Treatment with NT1721 significantly improved the survival time; control mice died after 14 days, while treatment with 15 mg/kg of NT1721 doubled the median survival time to 29 days (Figure (Figure5C).5C). We then compared the efficacy of daily treatment with NT1721 (15 mg/kg) to treatment with 30 mg/kg of NT1721 administered on 3 consecutive days per week in NSG mice (male and female, injected with 106 luc+ Molm14 cells). Tumors grew slower in male compared to female mice (Figure (Figure5A).5A). However, daily doses of 15 mg/kg of NT1721 suppressed tumor growth by 70–80% in both male and female mice compared to the respective control mice (day 16 and 20, Figure Figure5A).5A). Treatment on 3 consecutive days with 30 mg/kg of NT1721 was significantly more efficacious compared to daily doses of 15 mg/kg; mice receiving 30 mg/kg of NT1721 displayed a > 95% lower tumor burden compared to the control (days 16 and 20, Figure Figure5A).5A). Median survival times also increased from 39 days for mice receiving 15 mg/kg to 42 days for mice receiving 30 mg/kg (Figure (Figure5C).5C). Taken together, these data indicate that NT1721 potently inhibited AML proliferation in vivo and significantly increased survival times.

Figure 5
Efficacy of NT1721 in a systemic AML mouse model

To investigate the effect of NT1721 on gene expression levels in vivo, we sacrificed mice from the control and treatment groups (daily doses of 15 mg/kg) after 14 days. We then isolated human CD45+ cells from the bone marrow of individual mice (n = 3/group) and assessed the changes in gene expression by qPCR. As shown in Figure Figure5D,5D, treatment with NT1721 significantly decreased the expression of DNMT1, BMI1, FLT3LG and BCL2 in treated mice compared to the control, recapitulating the changes we observed in vitro.

DISCUSSION

Clinical outcome for AML patients, especially for those harboring FLT3-ITD mutations, remains poor despite initial responses to chemotherapy with cytarabine and treatment with FLT3 inhibitors [12, 38]. Increasing drug resistance over the course of the treatment and the persistence of leukemic stem cells are thought to be major causes for high relapse and poor survival rates, highlighting the need for new treatment options [46].

Aberrant DNA and histone methylation patterns are common in AML patients and can be used to predict treatment outcome, thus underscoring the important role of epigenetic mechanisms in AML development [47]. Previous reports show that significantly increased BMI1 expression in CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood and bone marrow of AML patients compared to normal cells is associated with worse prognosis [39, 48, 49]. DNMT1, EZH2 and BMI1 inhibition or knockdown induced re-expression of silenced tumor suppressor genes and apoptosis and importantly, repression of BMI1 decreased self-renewal and maintenance of leukemic stem cells [32, 39, 42, 50]. Hence, epigenetic modifiers have increasingly been recognized as promising drug targets in AML. Here, we show that treatment of AML cells with a novel ETP, NT1721, depleted DNMT1, EZH2 and BMI1 and concomitantly increased the expression of the tumor suppressor genes CDKN2A (p16), CDKN2B (p15) and BIM: Up-regulation of BIM may enhance apoptosis induction since a previous study showed that silencing of BIM promotes apoptosis resistance in leukemia [51]. In AML, inactivation has been reported for both CDKN2A (p16) and most frequently CDKN2B (p15) [33, 52]. While BMI1 depletion is associated with the re-expression of CDKN2A (p16) [39, 53], DNMT1 depletion might partially explain the increased expression of CDKN2B (p15): Previous reports showed a correlation between CDKN2B (p15) methylation and higher DNMT1 expression as well as an association of DNMT1 downregulation and p15 re-expression in AML [33, 42]. Moreover, depletion of the epigenetic modifiers concomitantly increased the expression level of several miRNAs (i.e. miR148a, miR214 and miR200c) that target DNMT1, EZH2 and BMI1 [41, 54] (data not shown). The increased miR expression could partially explain the downregulation of the epigenetic modifiers since a previous study demonstrated that DNMT1 depletion following treatment with the DNMT1 inhibitor, 5-azacitidine, increased the expression of miR214 and miR200c in cord blood-derived multipotent stem cells [41]. However, NT1721 does not directly inhibit DNMT1 as it has no inhibitory effect on DNMT1 in a cell-free assay (data not shown). Furthermore, it seems unlikely that the antileukemic effect of NT1721 is mainly mediated by SUV39H1 inhibition given the big difference in IC50 values between cell-based viability assays (lower nanomolar range for Molm14, MV4.11 and THP-1) and the SUV39H1 inhibition in a cell-free assay (1.3 μM). Thus, further studies are needed to understand the mechanism of action and determine the direct molecular target of NT1721.

Treatment of AML cells with NT1721 was more efficacious than treatment with cytarabine and sorafenib, regardless of the FLT3 mutation status. Importantly, NT1721 also induced apoptosis in CD34+/CD38/CD96+ KG1a leukemic stem-like cells that displayed resistance to clinically used AML drugs, i.e. cytarabine and sorafenib, suggesting that NT1721 may be a valuable new agent for the treatment of drug-resistant AML. Recent studies show that combining cytarabine with drugs that target epigenetic modifiers (i.e. DNMT1 and HDAC inhibitors) may be a promising new strategy for AML treatment [55, 56]. Here we show that combinations of NT1721 with cytarabine induced apoptosis and cell death more effectively than the single agents. Moreover, targeting FLT3 alone may not be sufficient to successfully treat AML since FLT3-ITD remains responsive to FLT3LG [8, 12, 13]. Autoactivation of FLT3-ITD in absence of FLT3LG is weak, which suggests that FLT3-ITD is hyperresponsive to its ligand rather than autoactivated [16]. Thus, the chemotherapy-induced FLT3LG surge is thought to be a possible cause for transient responses to treatment with single FLT3 inhibitors. Here we show that NT1721 attenuated the cytarabine-induced FLT3LG up-regulation and that combining the FLT3 inhibitor sorafenib with NT1721 induced apoptosis and cell death to a greater degree than the single agents. Our results indicate that targeting both FLT3 and FLT3LG may be more effective than FLT3 inhibition alone.

Taken together, our results suggest that NT1721 may be a valuable new agent for the treatment of AML regardless of the FLT3 mutation status. NT1721 (used either as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy or TKIs) could potentially improve the response of drug-resistant AML blasts and leukemic stem cells through the induction of silenced tumor suppression genes and downregulation of genes promoting self-renewal of leukemic stem cells. Our in vitro results and the potent in vivo activity of NT1721 in a systemic AML model provide a rational for future studies to test the clinical efficacy of NT1721 against AML.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents

The ETPs (UCI1406, NT1721, NT1722) were synthesized as previously described (Figure (Figure1A)1A) [34].

Cell culture

All cell lines were obtained from ATCC or the Leibniz Institute DSMZ (German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures), authenticated by STR-profiling at the sources and passaged for less than 6 months after receipt or resuscitation. MV4.11 and KG1a cells were maintained in IMDM medium supplemented with 10% or 20% FBS (omega scientific), respectively; THP1 and Molm14 cells were maintained in RPMI medium/10% FBS. Normal CD34+ bone marrow cells and primary AML samples from patients' peripheral blood or bone marrow were obtained from AllCells. All primary cells were cultured in IMDM/10% FBS.

Determination of IC50 values and synergism

20,000 cells/well were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with a wide range of concentrations (0.1 nM - 10 μM) of NT1721, cytarabine (R&D Systems), sorafenib (LC laboratories) or drug combinations as indicated. After 48 h, the cell viability was determined using the MTS assay (CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution, Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Data from the MTS assay were expressed as percent of viable cells compared to the vehicle control (0.3% DMSO). IC50 values were calculated from the dose response curve using GraphPad Prism 6 software. To quantify synergistic, additive or antagonistic effects of the drug combinations, the combination indexes (CI) were calculated using Calcusyn software (Biosoft), where CI < 1, CI = 1, and CI > 1 indicate synergistic, additive, and antagonistic effects, respectively.

Apoptosis assay and cell cycle analysis

Cells were treated with the drugs or drug combinations and harvested after 48 h. For the apoptosis assay, cells were stained with annexin V (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For the cell cycle analysis, cells were fixed in 70% ethanol for 1 h at 4°C, washed twice with PBS, treated with RNAse A at 37°C for 1 h and stained with propidium iodide (BD Biosciences). Fluorescence data were collected on a CyAN flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and analyzed with FlowJo software (TreeStar). The cell-cycle distribution was determined using the Watson (pragmatic) fit option in FlowJo.

Flow cytometry for cell surface markers

To determine the expression of CD34, CD38 and CD96 cells were stained with the following antibodies according to the manufacturer's instructions: PE-CD34, FITC-CD38 (BD Biosciences), PE-CD96 (Miltenyi, San Diego, CA) or an isotype control. Fluorescence data were analyzed with FlowJo software.

QPCR

Total RNA was isolated using the Direct-zol (Zymo Research) kit and reverse transcribed using the Tetro cDNA synthesis kit (Bioline). The following qPCR primers were used:

CDKN2B: 5′gcggggactagtggagaag/5′ctgcccatcatcatgacct; BCL2: 5′agtacctgaaccggcacct/5′gccgtacagttccacaaagg; BIM: 5′catcgcggtattcggttc/5′gctttgccatttggtcttttt; BMI1: 5′ccattgaattctttgaccagaa/5′ctgctgggcatcgtaagtatc; DNMT1: 5′caaacccctttccaaacctc/5′taatcctggggctaggtgaa; DNMT3B:5′agagggacatctcacggttc/5′ggttgccccagaagtatcg; FLT3LG: 5′ctggatcactcgccagaact/5′tggcagggttgaggagtc; GAPDH: 5′agccacatcgctcagacac/5′gcccaatacgaccaaatcc

Quantitative PCR was performed using a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad). Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method and GAPDH as reference gene.

Western blots

Cell lysates were prepared using RIPA buffer (Sigma)/Halt protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher, Rockford, IL) and the protein concentrations were determined using the BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher). Equal protein amounts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad). Immunodetection was performed using the following primary antibodies: BIM, BMI1, DNMT1, EZH2, Histone3, β-actin (Cell signaling), H3K9me3, H3K27me3, CDKN2A (p16) (abcam) and the appropriate ECL HPR-linked secondary antibodies (GE healthcare).

Lentiviral vectors

To generate a luciferase-expressing lentiviral plasmid, the plasmid pGL4.10[luc2] (Promega) was used as PCR template to amplify the luciferase (luc2) gene. The PCR product was cloned into the lentiviral plasmid pLVX-EF1α-IRES-puro (Clontech). Luciferase-expressing lentiviral vectors were then generated by calcium phosphate co-precipitation. Molm14 cells were transduced with the pLV-luc2-puro vectors at an MOI of 0.5 and selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin (Sigma).

In vivo studies

Mouse care and experimental procedures were performed under pathogen-free conditions in accordance with approved protocols from the institutional animal care and use committee of City of Hope National Medical Center. For the systemic AML model, 106 luciferase-expressing Molm14 cells were injected into the tail vein of 6-to 8-week old NSG mice (Jackson Laboratory). To determine the leukemic burden, we injected the mice (I.P.) with 3 mg D-Luciferin (Promega) 4 days after tumor injection and imaged them in an IVIS 100 (Caliper Life Sciences). A standard region of interest (ROI), which included the entire mouse, was used to determine the total body bioluminescence. Data were expressed as photons/s/mm2. The mice were then distributed into groups bearing equal tumor burdens and treated by gavage with NT1721 or the vehicle control (5% DMSO/30% solutol (Sigma)) as indicated.

To assess changes in gene expression levels in the human cells, we sacrificed mice after 14 days of treatment, extracted the bone marrow cells and isolated human cells using anti-human CD45 microbeads (Miltenyi) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The RNA was then isolated and used for qPCR assays.

Statistical analysis

The 2-tailed Student's t-test was used to determine statistical significance between two treatment groups; P values < 0.05 were considered to be significant. The log-rank test was used to evaluate the statistical significance in survival curves.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS FIGURES

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this publication included work performed in the Analytical Flow Cytometry Core supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number P30CA33572.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest: DAH and LEO are cofounders of Novonco Therapeutics Inc.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

The work was supported the A. Gary Anderson Family Foundation (to DAH), the Panda Charitable Foundation (to DAH), the NIH grant R01GM098601 (to LEO) and Novonco Therapeutics Inc.

REFERENCES

1. Kayser S, Levis MJ. FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia: clinical implications and limitations. Leuk lymphoma. 2014;55:243–255. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Swords R, Freeman C, Giles F. Targeting the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2012;26:2176–2185. [PubMed]
3. Ramos NR, Mo CC, Karp JE, Hourigan CS. Current Approaches in the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Med. 2015;4:665–695. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Robak P, Robak T. Older and new purine nucleoside analogs for patients with acute leukemias. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39:851–861. [PubMed]
5. Ravandi F, Kantarjian H, Faderl S, Garcia-Manero G, O'Brien S, Koller C, Pierce S, Brandt M, Kennedy D, Cortes J, Beran M. Outcome of patients with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. Leuk Res. 2010;34:752–756. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Fathi AT, Chen YB. Treatment of FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Blood Res. 2011;1:175–189. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Jin G, Matsushita H, Asai S, Tsukamoto H, Ono R, Nosaka T, Yahata T, Takahashi S, Miyachi H. FLT3-ITD induces ara-C resistance in myeloid leukemic cells through the repression of the ENT1 expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;390:1001–1006. [PubMed]
8. Levis M. FLT3/ITD AML and the law of unintended consequences. Blood. 2011;117:6987–6990. [PubMed]
9. Konig H, Levis M. Targeting FLT3 to treat leukemia. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2015;19:37–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Rollig C, Serve H, Huttmann A, Noppeney R, Muller-Tidow C, Krug U, Baldus CD, Brandts CH, Kunzmann V, Einsele H, Kramer A, Schafer-Eckart K, Neubauer A, et al. Addition of sorafenib versus placebo to standard therapy in patients aged 60 years or younger with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (SORAML): a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1691–1699. [PubMed]
11. Gallogly MM, Lazarus HM. Midostaurin: an emerging treatment for acute myeloid leukemia patients. J Blood Med. 2016;7:73–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Man CH, Fung TK, Ho C, Han HH, Chow HC, Ma AC, Choi WW, Lok S, Cheung AM, Eaves C, Kwong YL, Leung AY. Sorafenib treatment of FLT3-ITD(+) acute myeloid leukemia: favorable initial outcome and mechanisms of subsequent nonresponsiveness associated with the emergence of a D835 mutation. Blood. 2012;119:5133–5143. [PubMed]
13. Yang X, Sexauer A, Levis M. Bone marrow stroma-mediated resistance to FLT3 inhibitors in FLT3-ITD AML is mediated by persistent activation of extracellular regulated kinase. Br J Haematol. 2014;164:61–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Sato T, Yang X, Knapper S, White P, Smith BD, Galkin S, Small D, Burnett A, Levis M. FLT3 ligand impedes the efficacy of FLT3 inhibitors in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2011;117:3286–3293. [PubMed]
15. Zhou J, Bi C, Janakakumara JV, Liu SC, Chng WJ, Tay KG, Poon LF, Xie Z, Palaniyandi S, Yu H, Glaser KB, Albert DH, Davidsen SK, et al. Enhanced activation of STAT pathways and overexpression of survivin confer resistance to FLT3 inhibitors and could be therapeutic targets in AML. Blood. 2009;113:4052–4062. [PubMed]
16. Zheng R, Bailey E, Nguyen B, Yang X, Piloto O, Levis M, Small D. Further activation of FLT3 mutants by FLT3 ligand. Oncogene. 2011;30:4004–4014. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Mony U, Jawad M, Seedhouse C, Russell N, Pallis M. Resistance to FLT3 inhibition in an in vitro model of primary AML cells with a stem cell phenotype in a defined microenvironment. Leukemia. 2008;22:1395–1401. [PubMed]
18. van Rhenen A, Feller N, Kelder A, Westra AH, Rombouts E, Zweegman S, van der Pol MA, Waisfisz Q, Ossenkoppele GJ, Schuurhuis GJ. High stem cell frequency in acute myeloid leukemia at diagnosis predicts high minimal residual disease and poor survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:6520–6527. [PubMed]
19. Gardiner DM, Waring P, Howlett BJ. The epipolythiodioxopiperazine (ETP) class of fungal toxins: distribution, mode of action, functions and biosynthesis. Microbiology. 2005;151:1021–1032. [PubMed]
20. Hurne AM, Chai CL, Waring P. Inactivation of rabbit muscle creatine kinase by reversible formation of an internal disulfide bond induced by the fungal toxin gliotoxin. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:25202–25206. [PubMed]
21. Cook KM, Hilton ST, Mecinovic J, Motherwell WB, Figg WD, Schofield CJ. Epidithiodiketopiperazines block the interaction between hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) and p300 by a zinc ejection mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:26831–26838. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Tibodeau JD, Benson LM, Isham CR, Owen WG, Bible KC. The anticancer agent chaetocin is a competitive substrate and inhibitor of thioredoxin reductase. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11:1097–1106. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Song X, Zhao Z, Qi X, Tang S, Wang Q, Zhu T, Gu Q, Liu M, Li J. Identification of epipolythiodioxopiperazines HDN-1 and chaetocin as novel inhibitor of heat shock protein 90. Oncotarget. 2015;6:5263–5274. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3029. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Chiba T, Saito T, Yuki K, Zen Y, Koide S, Kanogawa N, Motoyama T, Ogasawara S, Suzuki E, Ooka Y, Tawada A, Otsuka M, Miyazaki M, et al. Histone lysine methyltransferase SUV39H1 is a potent target for epigenetic therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:289–298. [PubMed]
25. Isham CR, Tibodeau JD, Jin W, Xu R, Timm MM, Bible KC. Chaetocin: a promising new antimyeloma agent with in vitro and in vivo activity mediated via imposition of oxidative stress. Blood. 2007;109:2579–2588. [PubMed]
26. Lakshmikuttyamma A, Scott SA, DeCoteau JF, Geyer CR. Reexpression of epigenetically silenced AML tumor suppressor genes by SUV39H1 inhibition. Oncogene. 2010;29:576–588. [PubMed]
27. Greiner D, Bonaldi T, Eskeland R, Roemer E, Imhof A. Identification of a specific inhibitor of the histone methyltransferase SU(VAR)3–9. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1:143–145. [PubMed]
28. Copeland RA, Solomon ME, Richon VM. Protein methyltransferases as a target class for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:724–732. [PubMed]
29. Lee MC, Kuo YY, Chou WC, Hou HA, Hsiao M, Tien HF. Gfi-1 is the transcriptional repressor of SOCS1 in acute myeloid leukemia cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2014;95:105–115. [PubMed]
30. Lai YS, Chen JY, Tsai HJ, Chen TY, Hung WC. The SUV39H1 inhibitor chaetocin induces differentiation and shows synergistic cytotoxicity with other epigenetic drugs in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Blood cancer J. 2015;5:e313. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Vire E, Brenner C, Deplus R, Blanchon L, Fraga M, Didelot C, Morey L, Van Eynde A, Bernard D, Vanderwinden JM, Bollen M, Esteller M, Di Croce L, et al. The Polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature. 2006;439:871–874. [PubMed]
32. Tanaka S, Miyagi S, Sashida G, Chiba T, Yuan J, Mochizuki-Kashio M, Suzuki Y, Sugano S, Nakaseko C, Yokote K, Koseki H, Iwama A. Ezh2 augments leukemogenicity by reinforcing differentiation blockage in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012;120:1107–1117. [PubMed]
33. Mizuno S, Chijiwa T, Okamura T, Akashi K, Fukumaki Y, Niho Y, Sasaki H. Expression of DNA methyltransferases DNMT1, 3A, and 3B in normal hematopoiesis and in acute and chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2001;97:1172–1179. [PubMed]
34. Baumann M, Dieskau AP, Loertscher BM, Walton MC, Nam S, Xie J, Horne D, Overman LE. Tricyclic Analogues of Epidithiodioxopiperazine Alkaloids with Promising and Antitumor Activity. Chem sci. 2015;6:4451–4457. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Fuchs D, Daniel V, Sadeghi M, Opelz G, Naujokat C. Salinomycin overcomes ABC transporter-mediated multidrug and apoptosis resistance in human leukemia stem cell-like KG-1a cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;394:1098–1104. [PubMed]
36. She M, Niu X, Chen X, Li J, Zhou M, He Y, Le Y Guo K. Resistance of leukemic stem-like cells in AML cell line KG1a to natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Cancer Lett. 2012;318:173–179. [PubMed]
37. Hosen N, Park CY, Tatsumi N, Oji Y, Sugiyama H, Gramatzki M, Krensky AM, Weissman IL. CD96 is a leukemic stem cell-specific marker in human acute myeloid leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:11008–11013. [PubMed]
38. Grunwald MR, Levis MJ. FLT3 inhibitors for acute myeloid leukemia: a review of their efficacy and mechanisms of resistance. Int J Hematol. 2013;97:683–694. [PubMed]
39. Rizo A, Olthof S, Han L, Vellenga E, de Haan G, Schuringa JJ. Repression of BMI1 in normal and leukemic human CD34(+) cells impairs self-renewal and induces apoptosis. Blood. 2009;114:1498–1505. [PubMed]
40. Wu ZL, Zheng SS, Li ZM, Qiao YY, Aau MY, Yu Q. Polycomb protein EZH2 regulates E2F1-dependent apoptosis through epigenetically modulating Bim expression. Cell Death Diff. 2010;17:801–810. [PubMed]
41. So AY, Jung JW, Lee S, Kim HS, Kang KS. DNA methyltransferase controls stem cell aging by regulating BMI1 and EZH2 through microRNAs. PloS one. 2011;6:e19503. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Yu J, Peng Y, Wu LC, Xie Z, Deng Y, Hughes T, He S, Mo X, Chiu M, Wang QE, He X, Liu S, Grever MR, et al. Curcumin down-regulates DNA methyltransferase 1 and plays an anti-leukemic role in acute myeloid leukemia. PloS one. 2013;8:e55934. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Xu Z, Liu H, Lv X, Liu Y, Li S, Li H. Knockdown of the Bmi-1 oncogene inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell apoptosis and is involved in the decrease of Akt phosphorylation in the human breast carcinoma cell line MCF-7. Oncol Rep. 2011;25:409–418. [PubMed]
44. Balasubramanian S, Adhikary G, Eckert RL. The Bmi-1 polycomb protein antagonizes the (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate-dependent suppression of skin cancer cell survival. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:496–503. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Song W, Tao K, Li H, Jin C, Song Z, Li J, Shi H, Li X, Dang Z, Dou K. Bmi-1 is related to proliferation, survival and poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Sci. 2010;101:1754–1760. [PubMed]
46. Ueda K, Yoshimi A, Kagoya Y, Nishikawa S, Marquez VE, Nakagawa M, Kurokawa M. Inhibition of histone methyltransferase EZH2 depletes leukemia stem cell of mixed lineage leukemia fusion leukemia through upregulation of p16. Cancer Sci. 2014;105:512–519. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Figueroa ME, Lugthart S, Li Y, Erpelinck-Verschueren C, Deng X, Christos PJ, Schifano E, Booth J, van Putten W, Skrabanek L, Campagne F, Mazumdar M, Greally JM, et al. DNA methylation signatures identify biologically distinct subtypes in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer cell. 2010;17:13–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Chowdhury M, Mihara K, Yasunaga S, Ohtaki M, Takihara Y, Kimura A. Expression of Polycomb-group (PcG) protein BMI-1 predicts prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2007;21:1116–1122. [PubMed]
49. van Gosliga D, Schepers H, Rizo A, van der Kolk D, Vellenga E, Schuringa JJ. Establishing long-term cultures with self-renewing acute myeloid leukemia stem/progenitor cells. Exp Hematol. 2007;35:1538–1549. [PubMed]
50. Shi J, Wang E, Zuber J, Rappaport A, Taylor M, Johns C, Lowe SW, Vakoc CR. The Polycomb complex PRC2 supports aberrant self-renewal in a mouse model of MLL-AF9;Nras(G12D) acute myeloid leukemia. Oncogene. 2013;32:930–938. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Ridinger-Saison M, Evanno E, Gallais I, Rimmele P, Selimoglu-Buet D, Sapharikas E, Moreau-Gachelin F, Guillouf C. Epigenetic silencing of Bim transcription by Spi-1/PU.1 promotes apoptosis resistance in leukaemia. Cell Death Diff. 2013;20:1268–1278. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Guo SX, Taki T, Ohnishi H, Piao HY, Tabuchi K, Bessho F, Hanada R, Yanagisawa M, Hayashi Y. Hypermethylation of p16 and p15 genes and RB protein expression in acute leukemia. Leuk Res. 2000;24:39–46. [PubMed]
53. Park IK, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Bmi1, stem cells, and senescence regulation. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:175–179. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Zhu A, Xia J, Zuo J, Jin S, Zhou H, Yao L, Huang H, Han Z. MicroRNA-148a is silenced by hypermethylation and interacts with DNA methyltransferase 1 in gastric cancer. Med Oncol. 2012;29:2701–2709. [PubMed]
55. Qin T, Youssef EM, Jelinek J, Chen R, Yang AS, Garcia-Manero G, Issa JP. Effect of cytarabine and decitabine in combination in human leukemic cell lines. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4225–4232. [PubMed]
56. Xie C, Edwards H, Xu X, Zhou H, Buck SA, Stout ML, Yu Q, Rubnitz JE, Matherly LH, Taub JW, Ge Y. Mechanisms of synergistic antileukemic interactions between valproic acid and cytarabine in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:5499–5510. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC