|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
We present a case of choroidal nevus, complicated by a choroidal neovascular membrane (CNV) that was detected by OCT angiography. Choroidal nevi are relatively common intraocular tumors. The presence of subretinal and intraretinal fluids can indicate that a CNV has occurred as a complication, warranting prompt management. However, subretinal and intraretinal fluids are also documented in nevi without CNV. OCT angiography may be of great help in determining whether those fluids are associated or not with a CNV, therefore guiding therapy.
Choroidal nevi are relatively common intraocular tumors, benign in nature and with little potential for visual loss or growth into melanoma . B-scans of choroidal nevi obtained by standard spectral domain OCT may identify overlying retinal alterations, photoreceptor atrophy, and retinal pigment epithelial detachment, while enhanced depth imaging or swept-source OCT enables characterization of the deeper features of those lesions.
Subretinal and intraretinal fluids can accompany choroidal nevi [2, 3]. In this situation, observation is usually required. On the other hand, choroidal neovascular membranes (CNVs) are known to rarely complicate nevi. It is crucial to promptly identify this potentially blinding complication, which can be treated by intraocular injection of agents inhibiting antivascular endothelial growth factor, even when it develops at the fovea, [4, 5].
We describe a man in his 60s, with a right macular pigmented nevus documented for years, who presented with right metamorphopsia. Visual acuity was 12/20, and funduscopy revealed a macular melanotic nevus without hemorrhage. Swept-source OCT B-scans showed subretinal fluid over a choroidal nevus distending into the retina (Fig. (Fig.1).1). OCT angiography captured a well-defined CNV emanating from the nevus and bulging towards the neurosensory retina (Fig. (Fig.22).
This patient received 3 bevacizumab injections, with rapid disappearance of the subretinal fluid on B-scans, shrinkage of the neovascular network on OCT angiography (to the level of no detection of vascular signal), and improvement of his visual acuity to 16/20.
OCT angiography cannot demonstrate leakage and therefore, unlike fluorescein angiography, does not formally establish causality between the CNV and the subretinal fluid. However, in most cases, the association of CNV with a nevus accompanied by subretinal fluid should be sufficient to specifically address the neovascular complication.
Hence, OCT angiography may replace fluorescein angiography (Fig. (Fig.3)3) in determining whether subretinal and intraretinal fluids are related or not to CNV, a complication with major prognostic and therapeutic implications.
A patient approval form was filled for publication of the pictures obtained in the course of regular consultations in our retina clinic.
The authors report no conflicts of interest.