PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of oncotargetLink to Publisher's site
 
Oncotarget. 2016 November 29; 7(48): 78412–78420.
Published online 2016 October 6. doi:  10.18632/oncotarget.12512
PMCID: PMC5346649

Gene therapy with plasmids encoding IFN-β or IFN-α14 confers long-term resistance to HIV-1 in humanized mice

Abstract

Because endogenous interferon type I (IFN-I) produced by HIV-1 infection might complicate the analysis of therapeutically administered IFN-I, we tested different humanized mouse models for induction of IFN-I during HIV-1 infection. While HIV-1 induced high levels of IFN-α in BLT mice, IFN-I was undetectable following infection in the Hu-PBL mouse model, in which only T cells expand. We therefore tested the effect of treatment with Pegylated IFN-2 (pegasys), in Hu-PBL mice. Pegasys prevented CD4 T cell depletion and reduced the viral load for 10 days, but the effect waned thereafter. We next expressed IFN-I subsets (IFN-α2, −α6, −α8, −α14, and −β) in Hu-PBL mice by hydrodynamic injection of plasmids encoding them and 2 days later infected the mice with HIV-1. CD4 T cell depletion was prevented in all subtypes of IFN-I-expressing mice by day 10. However, at day 40 post-infection, protection was seen in IFN-β- and IFN-α14-expressing mice, but not the others. The viral load followed an inverse pattern and was highest in control mice and lowest in IFN-β- and IFN-α14-expressing mice until day 40 after infection. These results show that gene therapy with plasmids encoding IFN-β and −α14, but not the commonly used −α2, confers long-term suppression of HIV-1 replication.

Keywords: interferon, HIV-1, hydrodynamic injection, Immunology and Microbiology Section, Immune response, Immunity

INTRODUCTION

Interferons (IFNs) are a family of cytokines with antiviral, anti-proliferative, and antitumor effects as well as modulatory effects on the innate and adaptive immune responses (reviewed in [1]). IFNs are classified into three types: type I (IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-ω, IFN-ε, and IFN-κ), type II (IFN-γ), and type III (IFN- λ1, IFN- λ2, and IFN-λ3) [2]. Among the IFN-I, IFN-α and IFN-β have been well studied. IFN-α actually consists of 12 unique subtypes expressed by separate tandemly arranged genes on human chromosome 9, whereas IFN-β exists as a single member [2, 3]. Antibodies specific to different IFN-α subtypes are not available, making studies to test the role of individual subtypes difficult. Because of extensive sequence homology, designing RT-PCR primers is also difficult. For these reasons, the well-studied IFN-α2 subtype is the only one that is currently licensed to treat infections caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HCV [4].

Increased plasma levels of IFN-α and expression of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) have been reported in HIV-1-infected patients and SIV-infected monkeys, which suggests that HIV-1 infection induces IFN-I [58]. IFN-α has also been tried as a monotherapy or as an adjuvant to antiretroviral therapy during HIV-1 infection but resulted in highly variable results, suggesting that despite its suppressive effect on HIV-1 replication, IFN-α treatment does not significantly reverse CD4 T cell decline or influence clinical outcome [914]. Similarly, protective as well as worsening effects of IFN-α were also seen during virulent SIV infection in rhesus macacques [15]. These results, as well as the availability of potent antiretroviral drugs, have reduced enthusiasm for using IFN-α in the clinic. However, interest has re-emerged following the discovery that several HIV-1 restriction factors, such as APOBEC3, MX2, and tetherin, are all ISGs [16]. Moreover, it has also been suggested that achieving a functional HIV-1 cure may be advanced through IFN-α-based therapies [17, 18].

IFN-α2, which was tested in the previously mentioned studies, is the only type 1 IFN approved for therapy. Since antibodies that distinguish different subtypes of IFN-α2 are not available, which subtypes are produced during HIV infection are not known precisely, although it has been reported that IFN-α2 and −α6 subtypes may be more common,[19]. A recent study analyzed the expression of different IFN-α subtypes after exposure of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) to HIV-1BaL by a combination of PCR (with primers designed to identify all subtypes) and deep sequencing to identify individual members. The expression of subsets was found to vary, with IFN-α2, −α1/13, and −α10 being the most abundantly expressed subtypes, with −α6 expressed at a 10-fold lower level [20].

All IFN-α subtypes bind to the same type I interferon receptor (IFNAR). However, the binding affinity of different subsets varies [21, 22], resulting in the induction of different signaling pathways and distinct ISG expression patterns [23, 24]. Differences in the efficacy of different subsets have been described in HSV, MCMV, and influenza virus infection in mice, suggesting that these subtypes are not redundant [25, 26]. In HIV-1 infection, an early study suggested that IFN-α2 may be the most potent subtype, but only six IFN-α subtypes were evaluated against an X4-tropic, lab-adapted HIV-1 strain in the MT-2 T cell line [27]. However, Harper et al. recently reported that there was an inverse relationship between IFN-α subtype expression and potency in reducing HIV-1 replication in vitro. They found that the most abundantly expressed (upon HIV infection of pDCs) subtypes, IFN-α2 and −α1/13, were much less effective compared with IFN-α6, −α14, and −α8, which were expressed at much lower levels [20].

Testing whether different subsets of IFN-I differentially affect HIV-1 replication in vivo is complicated by endogenous IFN-I production elicited by the infection itself. Here we found that endogenous IFN-I is not produced in the Hu-PBL mouse model, allowing assessment of IFN-I subsets for antiviral activity. Moreover, using hydrodynamic injection of plasmids encoding IFN-I subsets, we show that while all subsets suppress HIV-1 replication compared with controls, the effect is longer lasting in IFN-β- and IFN-α14-treated mice, raising the possibility of gene therapy using these plasmids.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Our aim was to test the efficacy of exogenously administered IFN-I for anti-HIV-1 activity in vivo. Since HIV-1 infection itself is expected to induce IFN-I, we sought an animal model in which endogenous IFN-I would not complicate the analysis of results. Therefore, we tested BLT and Hu-PBL mice for production of IFN-I following HIV-1 infection. BLT mice were produced by implanting human fetal thymus and liver tissue under the renal capsule in NOD-scid IL2rγcnull (NSG) mice, followed by i.v. injection of autologous HSCs isolated from fetal liver. After confirming reconstitution of human immune cells at 12-15 weeks, the mice were infected with the HIV-1BaL strain (20 ng p24/animal). For the Hu-PBL model, NSG mice were implanted with human PBMCs, and after verifying human T cell reconstitution on day 10, the mice were infected with HIV-1BaL. On different days following infection, the sera were tested for IFN-I using the human IFN-α Multi-Subtype and IFN-β ELISA Kit. While a high level of IFN-α was detectable in BLT mice after HIV-1 infection, no IFN-α or −β could be detected in Hu-PBL mice (Figure 1A-1C). This result is probably due to the fact that plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are critical for IFN-I production. While pDCs are present in BLT mice, they are not present in Hu-PBL mice, in which only T cells expand due to xenogenic activation. This result is also consistent with the results of Li et al. showing that depletion of pDCs using monoclonal antibodies in BLT mice prior to HIV-1 infection abolished IFN-I production [28]. Since IFN-I was not produced in Hu-PBL mice, this would serve as a good animal model to study the role of IFN-I subsets without complications from HIV-induced IFN-I. We therefore used this model for further studies.

Figure 1
IFN-α is induced after HIV-1 infection in BLT but not Hu-PBL mice, and pegasys treatment in Hu-PBL mice upregulates ISGs

Pegasys treatment transiently protects against HIV replication in Hu-PBL mice

To determine whether pegylated IFN-α2 (pegasys) can be used in Hu-PBL mice, we tested for upregulation of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) following pegasys treatment. To do this, we transplanted human PBMCs into NSG mice, and after verifying human T cell expansion on day 10, treated these mice once with 200 ng of pegasys. Upregulation of select ISGs was tested by qRT-PCR. Compared with control mice, maximal upregulation of ISGs was seen on day 5 and declined to pre-treatment levels by day 15 (Figure (Figure1D).1D). Therefore, we chose 8-10-day intervals for pegasys administration after HIV-1 infection.

To test the effect of pegasys treatment, we treated Hu-PBL mice with varying doses of pegasys and infected the mice 2 days later with HIV-1BaL (20 ng p24). We repeated pegasys treatment on days 8 and 18 after infection and tested the mice for CD4 T cell depletion and plasma viremia. HIV infected (untreated) mice showed a profound depletion of CD4 T cells by day 10 after infection. This effect was prevented in a dose-dependent manner in the pegasys-treated group on day 10. However, even the highest dose treated mice started losing CD4 T cells by day 15, and by day 25, CD4 T cells were undetectable (Figure 2A, 2B). Plasma p24, which was reduced by day 10 in the pegasys-treated mice, also began to increase beyond day 15, and there was no difference between the control and treated group on day 25 (Figure (Figure2C).2C). Thus, pegasys treatment confers transient protection against HIV-1 replication in Hu-PBL mice.

Figure 2
IFN-α2 (pegasys) treatment delays HIV disease progression in Hu-PBL mice

Hydrodynamic injection of plasmids encoding IFN-I leads to sustained IFN-I production and ISG upregulation

Harper et al. recently reported an inverse relationship between IFN-α subtype expression and potency for reducing HIV-1 replication in vitro. IFN-α2 was highly expressed but was the least potent of the different subtypes in its anti-HIV effects. Therefore, we next wanted to test whether other subtypes enhance protection against HIV-1 infection in vivo. Human cytokines can be expressed in humanized mice by hydrodynamic injection of plasmids [29], which results in ready transfection of hepatocytes [30]. This method would also provide a possible means for gene therapy. Therefore, we first tested whether different IFN-I subtypes can be expressed in Hu-PBL mice. We rapidly injected (within 10 sec) 50 μg of plasmids encoding IFN-I subtypes in a 1- ml volume i.v. in groups of Hu-PBL mice and tested their sera for IFN-I at different time points by ELISA. All tested subtypes of human IFN-I were expressed in all mice at all time points tested (Figure (Figure3A).3A). The protein levels declined over time but were still detectable at substantial levels at the end point. We also tested ISG expression in PBMCs at different time points by qRT-PCR. Sustained upregulation of human ISGs (OAS1, OAS2 and MX-2) was seen for up to 40 days after injection (Figure (Figure3B).3B). Other HIV-1 restriction factors such as TRIM5α, TRIM22, SAMHD1, BST2 and APOBECC3G and IFITM3 have all been proposed to inhibit HIV-1, often with gene variant- or cellular context specificity[31]. Therefore, we also tested for induction of other HIV-1 restriction factors (APOBEC3G, BST, IFITM3 and TRIM-5α) on day 2 and 40 after plasmid injection. Although all these factors were upregulated in all IFN-I subtype expressing mice, in general, the levels were the lowest in IFN-α2 expressing mice and highest in IFN-α14 and IFN-β expressing mice (Figure (Figure3C3C).

Figure 3Figure 3
Injection of plasmids expressing subtypes of IFN-I results in prolonged upregulation of ISGs

Gene therapy with plasmids encoding IFN-β or IFN-α14 confers long-lasting protection against HIV-1 compared with other subtypes

To test for an anti-viral effect, we transplanted human PBMCs into NSG mice, and after verifying human T cell expansion on day 10, we hydrodynamically injected the mice with plasmids encoding IFN-α2a, −α6, −α8, −α14, or −β. Two days later, the mice were infected with HIVBaL (20 ng p24/animal) and tested for CD4 T cell depletion in PBMCs on days 10 and 40 and for plasma viremia on days 10, 20, and 40. Compared with uninfected mice, CD4 T cells were almost completely depleted on day 10 post infection in HIV-1-infected (empty vector injected) mice. By contrast, CD4 T cell depletion was prevented in all IFN-I subtype-expressing, HIV-1-infected mice by day 10 to a varying extent, most prominently in IFN-β- and IFN-α14-expressing mice. By day 40 after infection, complete depletion was seen in the control, IFN-α2a- and IFN-α8-expressing mice. By contrast, in the IFN-β- and IFN-α14-expressing mice, CD4 T cells were 50% preserved compared with control uninfected mice, and in IFN-α6-expressing mice, they were 25% preserved (Figure (Figure4A4A).

Figure 4
IFN-α14 and IFN-β confer prolonged protection against HIV-1 in Hu-PBL mice compared to IFN-α2 and IFN-α8

Viral load was tested by p24 ELISA on days 10, 20, and 40. p24 was highest in control HIV-infected mice at all time points. A low level of p24 was detectable only in IFN-α2-expressing mice on day 10. On day 20, it was undetectable in IFN-β and IFN-α14-expressing mice but was detectable in the IFN-α2, IFN-α6, and IFN-α8expressing mice, although at a lower level than in infected control mice. On day 40, p24 was still barely detectable in IFN-β and IFN-α14-expressing mice but clearly detectable in the IFN-α2 and IFN-α8-expressing mice (30-40% of control mice, Figure Figure4B4B).

Taken together, our results suggest that, although all subtypes of IFN-I inhibit infection during early time points, certain subtypes, such as IFN-β and −α14 (which are not elicited during infection in humans [6]), have a robust and sustained antiviral effect. A recent study compared IFN-α2 with −α14 in BLT mice [32]. Similar to our results, they found that IFN-α14 effectively reduced HIV replication on day 11 post-infection. However, no effect was seen with IFN-α2, while we found that −α2 was also protective on day 10. This may be because in BLT mice IFN-α2 is induced endogenously due to infection, and further supplementation with exogenous IFN may not increase the protective effect, whereas in Hu-PBL mice, having no endogenous IFN-α2, the effect of IFN-α2 could be easily demonstrated. It would be interesting to test the combination of different subtypes for a potential additive/potentiating effect.

It should be noted that our study shows the effect of IFN-I on T cells. However, in the setting of a complete immune system, IFN-I subtypes have multiple and often complex effects on the innate and adaptive immune functions that could culminate in potentially beneficial or detrimental effects in chronic HIV-1 infection. In a recent study of SIV infection in rhesus macacques, blocking IFN-α signaling during only the first 4 weeks of infection resulted in accelerated disease progression and death from AIDS, suggesting a protective effect by IFN-α. However, treatment with pegasys (from 1-4 weeks post infection), although initially conferring resistance (in that it increased the number of intrarectal challenges needed for infection), also resulted in accelerated CD4 T cell depletion and increased viremia, probably due to desensitization induced by continued treatment [15]. By contrast, in the Hu-PBL mouse model, we found a sustained upregulation of ISGs for up to 30 days after plasmid injection, suggesting that IFN-α desensitization is not an issue in this model. Although the reason for this is not clear, it is possible that species-specific differences between monkey and human cells could account for this lack of desensitization. IFN-α has also been associated with HIV-induced immune activation in humans. However, we could not assess this effect in Hu-PBL mice because of the shorter duration of infection and the xenogenic activation of T cells in this model.

Overall, our results suggest that IFN-I has an important antiviral role during the acute stage of infection, but the effect of subtypes that are predominantly elicited by infection, such as IFN-α2, wanes over time. However, some subtypes that are not elicited during HIV infection, such as IFN-β and −α14, appear to have a robust and sustained antiviral effect, offering a potentially new therapeutic agent. Moreover, since prolonged expression of IFNs can be achieved via DNA injection, this could also provide a vector for gene therapy in treating HIV-1 infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

NSG were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and maintained and bred in specific pathogen-free conditions at the TTUHSC animal facility, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine. All the experiments were performed with 6-8-week-old mice using study protocols approved by the TTUHSC IACUC committee.

Hydrodynamic injection of plasmids expressing human IFN-α and IFN-β subtypes

Human IFNA-α2-expressing plasmid was obtained from Invivogen (San Diego, CA, USA). The human IFN-α6 (NM_021002.2), IFN-α8 (NM_002170.3), IFN-α14 (NM_002172.2), and IFN-β (NM_002176.2) genes were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, Iowa) and cloned into the pUNO plasmid (Invivogen). Plasmids were purified using the EndoFree Plasmid Maxi kit from Qiagen (Valencia, CA, USA). For expressing human IFN-β and IFN-α subtypes in vivo, human PBMC-reconstituted NSG mice were injected with 50 μg of plasmid using a 27-gauge needle in a total volume of saline equivalent to 8% of the body mass of the mouse, which was delivered within 10 seconds [33, 34].

Human PBMC reconstitution and HIV infection

Human PBMCs were obtained from Astarte Biologics (Bothell, WA), and these cells (1×107) were injected through the tail vein into 6-8-week-old NSG mice. Human cell reconstitution was analyzed by retro-orbital bleeding 10 days post injection. Animals were either injected with pegasys (on day −2, 8, and 18) or with IFN plasmids (on day −2). Animals were infected with 20 ng of R5-tropic HIVBal by the i.p. route on day 0 and were bled periodically through retro-orbital bleeding. Human cell reconstitution was analyzed by flow cytometry, and the collected sera were used for ELISA.

ELISA and flow cytometry

IFN-α and IFN-β levels in mouse sera were determined using commercial ELISA kits (PBL Assay Science, Piscataway, NJ USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. HIV-1 replication was analyzed by p24 ELISA assay (Perkin Elmer) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Various fluorescence-conjugated antibodies to human CD3, CD4, CD8, and CD45 were obtained from Biolegend (San Diego, CA) or Tonbo Biosciences (San Diego, CA). Cells were surface-stained using appropriate combinations of mAbs, and the samples were fixed and all flow cytometry data were acquired on FACS Canto II instrument (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software.

qRT-PCR analysis

For determining the expression of ISGs following pegasys treatment, animals were injected with 200 ng of pegasys, and human cells were isolated 5, 10, and 15 days post injection. For determining ISG expression following IFN-1 plasmid injection, Hu-PBL animals were bled at 2, 10, 20, and 40 days post plasmid injection, and the isolated cells were used for RNA isolation. Total RNA was purified from the cells using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen), and cDNA was prepared using SuperScript® III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix (Invitrogen). qRT-PCR was carried out with the following primers: OAS-1 FW: TAGCTCCTACCCTGTGTGTGTG, OAS-1 REV: TCCTGAAAAGTGGTGAGAGGAC, OAS-2 FW: CTAGAGCAGATTGACAGTGCTG, OAS-2 REV: TCTTCAGAGCTGTGCCTTTG, MX-2 FW: CCAAGGACTTCAACTTTCTCAC, MX2- REV: GAGTCGATGAGGTCAATGCAG; BST FW: GACTATTGCAGAGTGCCCATG, BST REV: TGACATTGCGACACTCCATCA; TRIM5 alpha FW: GACGGAGAACGTGACCTTGA, TRIM5alpha REV: CCACTGTCACATCAACCCAGT; IFITM3 FW: CCTTCTTCTCTCCTGTCAACAGT, IFITM3 REV: ATGTGGATCACGGTGGACG; APOBEC 3G FW: TCTGGCTGTGCTACGAAGTGA, APOBEC 3G REV: TCCTCCACTTGCTGAACCAG;

GAPDH-FW: ATGGGTGTGAACCATGAGAAG, GAPDH-REV: TGGCATGGACTGTGGTCATG.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using prism 5.0 (GraphPad). For comparison of data with over two variables (IFN-α subtypes and IFN-β), non-parametric Kruskal Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison analysis was used. For data with two variables, non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used. For all statistical tests, P value < 0.05 were considered significant. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH grant R21AI108259 to MN.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors state no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Lopez de Padilla CM, Niewold TB. The type I interferons: Basic concepts and clinical relevance in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Gene. 2016;576:14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.09.058. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Pestka S, Krause CD, Walter MR. Interferons, interferon-like cytokines, and their receptors. Immunol Rev. 2004;202:8–32. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00204.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Chen J, Baig E, Fish EN. Diversity and relatedness among the type I interferons. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2004;24:687–98. doi: 10.1089/jir.2004.24.687. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Pestka S. The interferons: 50 years after their discovery, there is much more to learn. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:20047–51. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R700004200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Bosinger SE, Li Q, Gordon SN, Klatt NR, Duan L, Xu L, Francella N, Sidahmed A, Smith AJ, Cramer EM, Zeng M, Masopust D, Carlis JV, et al. Global genomic analysis reveals rapid control of a robust innate response in SIV-infected sooty mangabeys. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:3556–72. doi: 10.1172/JCI40115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Hardy GA, Sieg S, Rodriguez B, Anthony D, Asaad R, Jiang W, Mudd J, Schacker T, Funderburg NT, Pilch-Cooper HA, Debernardo R, Rabin RL, Lederman MM, et al. Interferon-alpha is the primary plasma type-I IFN in HIV-1 infection and correlates with immune activation and disease markers. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056527. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Jacquelin B, Mayau V, Targat B, Liovat AS, Kunkel D, Petitjean G, Dillies MA, Roques P, Butor C, Silvestri G, Giavedoni LD, Lebon P, Barre-Sinoussi F, et al. Nonpathogenic SIV infection of African green monkeys induces a strong but rapidly controlled type I IFN response. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:3544–55. doi: 10.1172/JCI40093. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. von Sydow M, Sonnerborg A, Gaines H, Strannegard O. Interferon-alpha and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in serum of patients in various stages of HIV-1 infection. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1991;7:375–80. doi: 10.1089/aid.1991.7.375. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Asmuth DM, Murphy RL, Rosenkranz SL, Lertora JJ, Kottilil S, Cramer Y, Chan ES, Schooley RT, Rinaldo CR, Thielman N, Li XD, Wahl SM, Shore J, et al. Safety, tolerability, and mechanisms of antiretroviral activity of pegylated interferon Alfa-2a in HIV-1-monoinfected participants: a phase II clinical trial. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:1686–96. doi: 10.1086/652420. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Gringeri A, Musicco M, Hermans P, Bentwich Z, Cusini M, Bergamasco A, Santagostino E, Burny A, Bizzini B, Zagury D. Active anti-interferon-alpha immunization: a European-Israeli, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 242 HIV-1--infected patients (the EURIS study) J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1999;20:358–70. doi. [PubMed]
11. Katabira ET, Sewankambo NK, Mugerwa RD, Belsey EM, Mubiru FX, Othieno C, Kataaha P, Karam M, Youle M, Perriens JH, Lange JM. Lack of efficacy of low dose oral interferon alfa in symptomatic HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Sex Transm Infect. 1998;74:265–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Lane HC, Davey V, Kovacs JA, Feinberg J, Metcalf JA, Herpin B, Walker R, Deyton L, Davey RT, Jr, Falloon J, et al. Interferon-alpha in patients with asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:805–11. [PubMed]
13. Mildvan D, Bassiakos Y, Zucker ML, Hyslop N, Jr, Krown SE, Sacks HS, Zachary J, Paredes J, Fessel WJ, Rhame F, Kramer F, Fischl MA, Poiesz B, et al. Synergy, activity and tolerability of zidovudine and interferon-alpha in patients with symptomatic HIV-1 infection: AIDS Clincal Trial Group 068. Antivir Ther. 1996;1:77–88. [PubMed]
14. Podzamczer D, Bolao F, Clotet B, Garcia P, Casanova A, Pagerols X, Gudiol F. Low-dose interferon alpha combined with zidovudine in patients with AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma. J Intern Med. 1993;233:247–53. [PubMed]
15. Sandler NG, Bosinger SE, Estes JD, Zhu RT, Tharp GK, Boritz E, Levin D, Wijeyesinghe S, Makamdop KN, del Prete GQ, Hill BJ, Timmer JK, Reiss E, et al. Type I interferon responses in rhesus macaques prevent SIV infection and slow disease progression. Nature. 2014;511:601–5. doi: 10.1038/nature13554. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Malim MH, Bieniasz PD. HIV Restriction Factors and Mechanisms of Evasion. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a006940. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006940. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Azzoni L, Foulkes AS, Papasavvas E, Mexas AM, Lynn KM, Mounzer K, Tebas P, Jacobson JM, Frank I, Busch MP, Deeks SG, Carrington M, O'Doherty U, et al. Pegylated Interferon alfa-2a monotherapy results in suppression of HIV type 1 replication and decreased cell-associated HIV DNA integration. J Infect Dis. 2013;207:213–22. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis663. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Sun H, Buzon MJ, Shaw A, Berg RK, Yu XG, Ferrando-Martinez S, Leal M, Ruiz-Mateos E, Lichterfeld M. Hepatitis C therapy with interferon-alpha and ribavirin reduces CD4 T-cell-associated HIV-1 DNA in HIV-1/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients. J Infect Dis. 2014;209:1315–20. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit628. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Lehmann C, Taubert D, Jung N, Fatkenheuer G, van Lunzen J, Hartmann P, Romerio F. Preferential upregulation of interferon-alpha subtype 2 expression in HIV-1 patients. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2009;25:577–81. doi: 10.1089/aid.2008.0238. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Harper MS, Guo K, Gibbert K, Lee EJ, Dillon SM, Barrett BS, McCarter MD, Hasenkrug KJ, Dittmer U, Wilson CC, Santiago ML. Interferon-alpha Subtypes in an Ex Vivo Model of Acute HIV-1 Infection: Expression, Potency and Effector Mechanisms. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1005254. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005254. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Jaks E, Gavutis M, Uze G, Martal J, Piehler J. Differential receptor subunit affinities of type I interferons govern differential signal activation. J Mol Biol. 2007;366:525–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.053. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Lavoie TB, Kalie E, Crisafulli-Cabatu S, Abramovich R, DiGioia G, Moolchan K, Pestka S, Schreiber G. Binding and activity of all human alpha interferon subtypes. Cytokine. 2011;56:282–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.07.019. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Cull VS, Tilbrook PA, Bartlett EJ, Brekalo NL, James CM. Type I interferon differential therapy for erythroleukemia: specificity of STAT activation. Blood. 2003;101:2727–35. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-05-1521. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Vazquez N, Schmeisser H, Dolan MA, Bekisz J, Zoon KC, Wahl SM. Structural variants of IFNalpha preferentially promote antiviral functions. Blood. 2011;118:2567–77. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-325027. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Gibbert K, Joedicke JJ, Meryk A, Trilling M, Francois S, Duppach J, Kraft A, Lang KS, Dittmer U. Interferon-alpha subtype 11 activates NK cells and enables control of retroviral infection. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002868. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002868. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Gibbert K, Schlaak JF, Yang D, Dittmer U. IFN-alpha subtypes: distinct biological activities in anti-viral therapy. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;168:1048–58. doi: 10.1111/bph.12010. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Sperber SJ, Gocke DJ, Haberzettl C, Kuk R, Schwartz B, Pestka S. Anti-HIV-1 activity of recombinant and hybrid species of interferon-alpha. J Interferon Res. 1992;12:363–8. doi: 10.1089/jir.1992.12.363. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Li G, Cheng M, Nunoya J, Cheng L, Guo H, Yu H, Liu YJ, Su L, Zhang L. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells suppress HIV-1 replication but contribute to HIV-1 induced immunopathogenesis in humanized mice. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004291. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004291. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Chen Q, Khoury M, Chen J. Expression of human cytokines dramatically improves reconstitution of specific human-blood lineage cells in humanized mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:21783–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912274106. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Suda T, Liu D. Hydrodynamic gene delivery: its principles and applications. Mol Ther. 2007;15:2063–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300314. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Merindol N, Berthoux L. Restriction Factors in HIV-1 Disease Progression. Curr HIV Res. 2015;13:448–61. [PubMed]
32. Lavender KJ, Gibbert K, Peterson KE, Van Dis E, Francois S, Woods T, Messer RJ, Gawanbacht A, Muller JA, Munch J, Phillips K, Race B, Harper MS, et al. Interferon Alpha Subtype-Specific Suppression of HIV-1 Infection In Vivo. J Virol. 2016;90:6001–13. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00451-16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Liu F, Song Y, Liu D. Hydrodynamics-based transfection in animals by systemic administration of plasmid DNA. Gene Ther. 1999;6:1258–66. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3300947. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Abraham S, Pahwa R, Ye C, Choi JG, Pahwa S, Jaggaiahgari S, Raut A, Chen S, Manjunath N, Shankar P. Long-term engraftment of human natural T regulatory cells in NOD/SCID IL2rgammac(null) mice by expression of human IL-2. PLoS One. 2012;7:e51832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051832. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC