PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
PLoS One. 2017; 12(3): e0173418.
Published online 2017 March 9. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0173418
PMCID: PMC5344503

Persistent fibrosis, hypertrophy and sarcomere disorganisation after endoscopy-guided heart resection in adult Xenopus

Robert E. Steele, Editor

Abstract

Models of cardiac repair are needed to understand mechanisms underlying failure to regenerate in human cardiac tissue. Such studies are currently dominated by the use of zebrafish and mice. Remarkably, it is between these two evolutionary separated species that the adult cardiac regenerative capacity is thought to be lost, but causes of this difference remain largely unknown. Amphibians, evolutionary positioned between these two models, are of particular interest to help fill this lack of knowledge. We thus developed an endoscopy-based resection method to explore the consequences of cardiac injury in adult Xenopus laevis. This method allowed in situ live heart observation, standardised tissue amputation size and reproducibility. During the first week following amputation, gene expression of cell proliferation markers remained unchanged, whereas those relating to sarcomere organisation decreased and markers of inflammation, fibrosis and hypertrophy increased. One-month post-amputation, fibrosis and hypertrophy were evident at the injury site, persisting through 11 months. Moreover, cardiomyocyte sarcomere organisation deteriorated early following amputation, and was not completely recovered as far as 11 months later. We conclude that the adult Xenopus heart is unable to regenerate, displaying cellular and molecular marks of scarring. Our work suggests that, contrary to urodeles and teleosts, with the exception of medaka, adult anurans share a cardiac injury outcome similar to adult mammals. This observation is at odds with current hypotheses that link loss of cardiac regenerative capacity with acquisition of homeothermy.

Introduction

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of mortality worldwide [1]. Myocardial infarction results in the loss of cardiomyocytes. In adult humans, these cardiomyocytes cannot be replaced. Organ function is maintained through adaptive tissue remodelling, including ventricular hypertrophy, often leading to heart failure [2,3]. Fundamental research using model organisms focuses increasingly on deciphering mechanisms and factors of repair and scarring, with the hope to unlock the ability to restore damaged cardiac tissue in humans [4]. Two main model organisms used in cardiac regenerative studies are zebrafish and mice [4,5]. Both show marked differences, adult zebrafish having a highly efficient cardiac regenerative capacity [6,7] while adult mice lack this ability [8,9].

Amphibians, such as anurans (i.e. frogs) and urodeles (i.e. salamanders), are evolutionarily placed between these two organisms and have been historical models for heart development and cardiovascular physiology [1013]. Like zebrafish, urodeles such as the neotenic axolotl [14,15] and adult eastern newt [1619], can regenerate their heart ventricle. Although Xenopus has been considered as a powerful model organism for regeneration research over the past decades [20], only limited information is available on the outcome of cardiac injury in this species and other frogs.

The idea to explore heart damage in frogs was first reported in 1875 although the outcome was not clear [21,22]. Nearly 100 years later, frog myocardial regeneration studies were resumed. Rumyantsev stated that the adult frog heart could partially regenerate based on the observation of “apparently newly formed myocardial tissue […] within the scar”, as well as mitotic cardiomyocytes and disorganised or dedifferentiated myofibres [2224]. Thereafter the exact extent of cardiac regeneration in anurans remained inconclusive, requiring more thorough analysis. It is surprising that heart regeneration has not been revisited in the Xenopus model since the regenerative capacity of tail, limb, retina and nerve tissue has been well described and continues to be explored [20,25]. We decided to reconsider Xenopus as a model for studying heart injury. Other authors have recently underlined the interest in investigating cardiac regeneration in this model [26].

Currently four approaches are used for inducing cardiac damage: i) genetic ablation of cardiomyocytes, ii) myocardial infarction induction by left anterior descending coronary artery ligation, iii) tissue removal by ventricular resection and iv) tissue damage by cryoinjury (freezing), cautery injury (burning) or mechanical injury (squeezing or electric shock) [2629]. Difficulties of the documented methods include exteriorising the heart, observation of extremely small vessels, reproducibility of the extent of damage and lack of injury visualisation. Such technical complexities could explain conflicting cardiac regeneration results observed in mice [8,9,3032].

Aiming to overcome these difficulties yet maintain accuracy, we developed and applied an endoscopy-guided approach for ventricular resection as a new, alternative cardiac injury technique. Endoscopy has numerous benefits such as live internal visualisation, standardised biopsy size, high precision and therefore increased reproducibility. Clinically, the main advantages include less stress for the animal and internal organs, ability to accurately collect samples for a definitive diagnosis, precise prognosis and direct therapy [33].

Using the endoscopy-guided cardiac injury procedure we showed that the adult Xenopus heart was unable to regenerate. In the first week after injury, genes associated with proliferation were not affected, while genes linked to sarcomere structure were down regulated and those related to inflammation, fibrosis and hypertrophy were up regulated. At the tissue level, fibrous scarring, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and sarcomere disorganisation were evident near the injury site, persisting 11 months post-amputation. Thus, adult Xenopus can complement adult mammalian models to study the consequences of heart injury after tissue removal. Furthermore, adapting our minimally invasive method of cardiac injury to other species could help limit surgical stress-related issues.

Materials and methods

Animals and ethics statement

The care and treatment of animals were in accordance with Institutional and National Guidelines (Commission de Génie Génétique, “Direction Départementale des Services Vétérinaires”, European Union Directive 2010/63/EU, agreement decision No. C75-05-01-2 for the European Convention for vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes). All protocols used in this study were approved under the reference number 68–037 by the Ethical Committee of the National Museum of Natural History (Paris). Animals were purchased from the Xenopus Biological Resource Centre (Rennes, France).

Studies involved adult Xenopus laevis (>5-year-old), only females to limit the experimental variations, housed in a facility with 12:12 hours light:dark cycles, 18–20 °C ambient temperature, dechlorinated and filtered water and a commercial diet (TetraRubin® granules).

Equipment

The procedures were performed with an endoscope system (Karl Storz) consisting of a 2.7 mm diameter, 18 cm length, 30 ° oblique rigid telescope with a 4.8 mm operating sheath, an endovideo camera and monitor, xenon light source and light cable and 1.7 mm endoscopic biopsy forceps. Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflator with silicone tubing was used for insufflation.

Analgesia and anaesthesia

For a better internal visualisation, frogs were fasted 24 hours prior to anaesthesia. Pre-surgical preparations included hydration of the animal in a shallow dechlorinated water water-bath. Analgesia was performed with an initial dose of butorphanol (1 mg/kg; Torbugésic Vet®; Zoétis France) followed by meloxicam (0.4 mg/kg; Metacam®; Boehringer-Ingelheim), both injected into the lymph sacs. After ten minutes, anaesthesia was performed by transferring the animals to a bath of buffered 1% tricaine methanesulfonate (Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate; Sigma) for 8 minutes. Loss of righting reflex suggested a light stage of anaesthesia. A surgical plane was indicated by the loss of withdrawal reflexes.

Endoscopy procedures

With the animal positioned in dorsal recumbence, the surgical field was aseptically prepared using a sterile gauze moistened with a dilute povidone-iodine solution (Betadine® solution 10%, Méda Pharma), left for 10–15 seconds on the surgical site.

A 3 mm paramedian skin incision was made just beneath the sternum. Care was taken to not damage the mid-ventral vein. Following skin incision the abdominal membrane was elevated, incised and carefully dissected. The telescope-sheath system was inserted into the pleuroperitoneal cavity, which was insufflated (S1A Fig and S1 File). Typically, a CO2 insufflation pressure of 0.5mm Hg with a flow rate not exceeding 0.5 l/min was used.

After endoscope insertion, the heart was located behind the falciform ligament (S1B Fig and S1 File), then using the endoscopic biopsy forceps the falciform ligament was opened and the single ventricle chamber was immediately apparent (S1C Fig and S1 File). The pericardial sac was carefully pinched open (S1D Fig and S1 File) and then during the ventricle diastole, an amputation was performed towards the heart apex (S1E and S1F Fig and S1 File). Once the scope was removed, the animal deflated immediately, naturally removing the CO2. The coelomic membrane and the skin were closed in one layer using interrupted sutures with monofilament nylon (S1 File). The animal was then transferred to an anaesthetic-free bath and rinsed copiously with fresh, well-oxygenated dechlorinated water. Operated frogs were fasted 24 hours after operation. Animals were subjected to the full amputation procedure (AMP), anesthetised and fasted but not operated (CTRL) or, for qPCR analysis, the procedure was stopped after opening the pericardium, leaving the ventricle intact (SHAM).

After surgery, the animals were monitored to full recovery and sacrificed (“experimental sacrifice”) for heart collection at 1, 3 and 7 dpa (days post-amputation), or 1, 2, 3, 6 and 11 mpa (months post-amputation). Animals that showed signs of ill health were not used in the study and were sacrificed (“ethical sacrifice”).

Sample preparation

For section labelling, each adult Xenopus heart was collected, paraformaldehyde-fixed (4% in phosphate buffered saline (PBS; Sigma) for 20 hours at 4 °C), equilibrated overnight in 15% sucrose in PBS, mounted in FSC22® frozen section compound (Sigma), and sagittal sections were obtained (8 μm-thickness) at -24°C using a cryostat (Leica CM30050S).

Immunohistochemistry

Sagittal heart sections were pre-incubated with 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (Sigma) in PBS for 5 minutes to allow for antigen unmasking. Then immunodetection was carried out as previously described [34], using the following antibodies: mouse anti-cardiac tropomyosin (CH1 1:1000; DSHB), rabbit anti-fibronectin (fn 1:500; F3648, Sigma), rabbit anti-atrial natriuretic factor (ANF known in Xenopus as, and referred to in the manuscript as NPPA 1:300; AB5490, Millipore), and the appropriate secondary antibodies (1:1500; Invitrogen). For cardiomyocyte cell membranes staining with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) AlexaFluor® 594 conjugate (Invitrogen), sections were washed three times in PBS, incubated for 10 minutes with WGA (5 μg.ml-1 in PBS), then washed again three times in PBS and once in PBS-T (0.1% Tween-20 (Sigma) in PBS) buffer.

All sections were counterstained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Molecular Probes) for 10 minutes, followed by mounting with Prolong® gold antifade reagent (Molecular Probe) and imaged under confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP5) or a fluorescence microscope (Leica DM5500B microscope and DFC450C camera with Prior Lumen200 light source). All fluorescent images were post-treated in Photoshop (Adobe), and merged using NIH ImageJ software [35]. To better visualise differences in WGA intensity, the signal was transformed by converting red colour images to “Red/Green”-scale using ImageJ/Image/Lookup Tables.

Picrosirius red (PSR) labelling

Sagittal heart sections were post-fixed for 30 minutes in formalin 10% (Sigma), followed by overnight fixation in Bouin’s solution (Sigma), and then extensively washed with tap water. Sections were incubated for one hour in PSR solution: 0.1% direct red 80 (Sigma) and 0.1% fast green FCF (Sigma) in saturated aqueous picric acid (1.2% picric acid in water; Sigma). Sections were quickly washed 10 times in distilled water, twice in 70% ethanol, then in 100% ethanol (2x15 minutes) and finally in Safesolv solution (Q Path®, VWR International; 2x15 minutes), before being mounted in safemount medium (Q Path®, VWR International). The slides were then imaged using a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ16F with QImaging Retiga camera) or a light microscope (Leica DM5500B and DFC450C camera).

Cell area quantification

The cross-sectional area of cardiomyocytes was measured using images displaying orthogonal views of WGA-labelled cardiomyocytes, to analyse for concentric hypertrophy. In Photoshop (Adobe) cell outlines were traced in red using a Wacom stylus pen and graphic tablet, then individual cell areas filled with blue before the outlines were deleted, and the image was saved as TIFF. Images were opened in NIH ImageJ software [35], and using the “Analyze Particles” setup, the filled areas were automatically calculated for each cell. Count was performed on 2 or 3 independent heart sections, corresponding to minima of 300 cell areas for each group. Area size of <10 pixels was excluded. Box and whisker (min to max) plots with tukey whiskers removed were shown and an unpaired non-parametric t-test (Mann Whitney) was performed to compare the groups with the control.

Gene monitoring by Real-time quantitative PCR

For RT-qPCR, independent biological replicates were collected from CTRL, SHAM and AMP animals. Hearts were collected, cleaned from atrium and arterial bulb (only the ventricle part was kept), then cut in half and thoroughly washed in PBS to eliminate the blood (which might compete with heart tissue gene expression as blood cells are nucleated), before being snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNAs were extracted from snap-frozen adult Xenopus heart ventricles using RNAqueous® Phenol-free total RNA isolation kit (Ambion), then quantified and quality controlled using Qubit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) respectively. Samples with RNA integrity (RIN) of ≥7 (average RIN 8.6) were reverse transcribed using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems) using a MyCyclerTM (Bio-Rad), following manufacturers recommendations. RT-qPCR reactions were performed in duplicate for each sample using Power SYBR® master mix on a QuantStudioTM6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems), following manufacturer recommendations. Primers (MWG Biotech) were designed using Primer Blast [36] and the relevant sequences are listed in S1 Table. Ct data were collected using ExpressionSuite Software (Applied Biosystems) and analysed using Excel (Microsoft). The Cts for each technical duplicate were averaged and normalised (ΔCt) against the geometric mean of two reference genes (smarcd1 and smn2), which were chosen after analysis by the NormFinder software [37]. These normalisers were chosen among 12 putative normalisers, already known to be expressed in adult Xenopus laevis cardiac ventricles (actnl6a, actn3, akt1, cebpb, col1a1, cxcl8, fn1, hif1a, smarcd1, tert; our unpublished data) or to be good normalisers in other tissues (smn2, odc); they were ranked on the basis of their expression stability in the samples presented in this paper and the best pair was retained. Variations of expression were quantified by the ΔΔCts method [38], using the SHAM condition as references for each experimental time-points and fold changes were computed as 2-ΔΔCt. Statistical analyses were performed on ΔCts with Prism 7 (GraphPad). Outliers were removed with ROUT test method (Q = 1%). One-Way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak’s post-test were performed for datasets that passed a Shapiro-Wilk normality test; Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test followed with Dunn's post-tests were performed for those that did not pass this test (namely fn1, 3 dpa; col1a1, 7 dpa; nppb, 7dpa; actn3, 3 dpa; tnnt2, 1 dpa; cxcl8, 7 dpa). *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001, ****, p < 0.0001).

Results

Application of endoscopic biopsy as a ventricular resection method in Xenopus

To overcome the problems of invasive methods, we developed an endoscopy-guided protocol for resecting part of the ventricle in the adult anuran Xenopus laevis (Fig 1, S1 Fig and S1 File). The minimal invasive surgery itself (from incision to skin suture) took on average 5 minutes (Fig 1A–1C). Compared to a non-operated heart (Fig 1D), a blood clot quickly formed at the site of amputation (Fig 1E), demonstrating that the procedure breached the myocardial wall to reach the cavity of the ventricle. The cardiac biopsies were collected (Fig 1E’) and we estimated that approximately 4% of the ventricle volume was thus amputated.

Fig 1
Ventricular resection endoscopic biopsy and animal survival in adult Xenopus laevis.

All animals (100%) recovered from the procedure uneventfully, regardless of whether they followed the complete procedure (AMP) (Fig 1), were anesthetised but not operated (CTRL) or the surgery was stopped after opening the pericardium (SHAM).

We performed 34 endoscopic amputation procedures (S2 Table). Of these 34 animals, 2 were ethically sacrificed (at 3 and 20 hours post-surgery) due to ill health, and 32 animals (>94%) were clinically healthy until a predetermined sacrifice time (Fig 1F and S2 Table), showing no distinguishable characteristics (e.g. mobility, appetite, skin pigmentation and escape reaction) from CTRL animals. We next investigated the cardiac regenerative capacity in the adult frog heart.

Persistent fibrosis is observed in injured frog ventricles

Cardiac histology was monitored up to 11 months post-amputation (mpa). Animals were sacrificed and hearts collected at 1 and 7 days post-amputation (dpa; Fig 2, top) and at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 11 mpa (Fig 2, top), and analysed using picrosirius (Fig 2A–2L) or immunohistochemical fibronectin and tropomyosin (Fig 2E’–2L’) labelling in order to assess both the immediate and long-term effect of injury on the ventricle. We observed that our method targeted a precise area, just above the apex, in a reproducible manner (Fig 2B–2D, arrowheads). The reproducibility of the amputation area is due to the approach angle of the endoscope to access the heart and perform the biopsy, which is comparable for each animal. Compared to a CTRL ventricle (Fig 2A, 2E and 2E’), the injured zone was clearly visible at 1 dpa (Fig 2B, 2F and 2F’) appearing as an area devoid of cardiomyocytes. In this area we observed a dense cluster of nuclei as revealed by DAPI staining (Fig 2F’) as well as a loose network of fibrous structures appearing light blue in picrosirius (Fig 2F, around the asterisk), which extended outwards (blueish haze surrounding the ventricle in Fig 2B) and corresponded to the blood clot (Fig 1E). The clot was still closing the wound at 7 dpa, when fibronectin expression started to increase in the epicardium (Fig 2G and 2G’), then it was progressively replaced by fibronectin rich scar tissue starting at 1 mpa (Fig 2C, 2H and 2H’). In the scar closing the wound, the DAPI staining progressively disappeared while the fibronectin labelling intensified through 2 mpa to 6 mpa (Fig 2I–2K and 2I’–2K’) and persisted at 11 mpa (Fig 2D, 2J–2L and 2J’–2L’). At each time-point observed, fibrosis persistence and non-continuity of the myocardial wall at the injury site demonstrated lack of regeneration.

Fig 2
Long-term monitoring reveals persisting fibrotic scar in adult frog hearts after cardiac amputation.

We thus showed that the heart of the adult anuran Xenopus laevis is unable to regenerate, even after 11 months post-amputation (Fig 2), despite the fact that only 4% of the ventricle volume was removed (Fig 1E’).

Cardiomyocytes are hypertrophic at the site of amputation

Cardiac remodelling through hypertrophy is an adaptive response to cardiac stress, ultimately leading to heart failure [2,3]. Since we observed that adult Xenopus heart displayed no sign of regeneration after cardiac injury, we looked for signs of hypertrophy by WGA staining (Fig 3, S2 Fig and S3 Fig). Using a filter, we transformed the images to enhance visualisation (Fig 3A–3L, right panels). Compared to CTRL hearts, there was no obvious increase in WGA staining in the vicinity of the injury site during the first week post-amputation (Fig 3C and 3E, S2 Fig). However, by 1 mpa, the injured zone displayed a clear increase in density of WGA staining (Fig 3G, S2 Fig), which persisted at 3, 6 and 11 mpa (Fig 3I and 3K, S2 Fig), meaning that more cell membrane was present in this region, and might reflect signs of cell hypertrophy with possibly associated atrophy. Increased WGA labelling was restricted to the vicinity of the amputation site since it was not observed in remote areas (compare Fig 3G, 3I, and 3K to Fig 3H, 3J and 3L, respectively). At higher magnifications the alteration of WGA staining was even more evident in longitudinal (Fig 3A'–3L’) or coronal (S3 Fig) views. Remarkably, WGA staining revealed that cardiomyocyte shape and tissue organisation were altered close to the amputation site at 1 dpa and remained altered up to 11 mpa (Fig 3C’, 3E’, 3G’, 3I’ and 3K’ and S3 Fig, top panels) compared to the control (Fig 3A’ and 3B’) and the corresponding remote areas (Fig 3D’, 3F’, 3H’, 3J’ and 3L’ and S3 Fig, bottom panels).

Fig 3
Cardiomyocytes show evidence of cell hypertrophy at the amputation site.

Thus, in order to determine the presence of cell hypertrophy, individual cell areas of orthogonal view cardiomyocytes were quantified near the amputation site (Fig 4). We observed that at all time-points post-amputation monitored, the cross-sectional area of cardiomyocytes was enlarged compared to the control, concluding a hypertrophic state of the cardiomyocytes in the vicinity of the amputated zone. Further, to confirm these observations, we performed an immuno-staining against natriuretic peptide A (NPPA), another known marker of hypertrophy, on heart sections at the same time-points post-amputation described above (Fig 5). From 1 mpa, we observed a clear increase of NPPA signal in the vicinity of the amputation site that remained present at 11 mpa, whereas signal was weak for the CTRL heart. In the remote zone, NPPA staining appeared to slightly increase in amputated hearts, suggesting an impact on the whole heart following injury.

Fig 4
Increased cardiomyocyte size persists eleven months post amputation.
Fig 5
Long lasting cardiac hypertrophy occurs in amputated frog heart.

Together these data revealed an induction of persistent cardiomyocyte hypertrophy after heart injury in adult Xenopus. Moreover, cellular and tissue disorganisation occurred concomitantly with the hypertrophy.

Striated cardiomyocyte disorganisation is observed at the amputation site

To further investigate cardiomyocyte structure and organisation, we observed the dynamics of tropomyosin labelling at higher magnification near the site of amputation, where fibrosis was observed, and in remote zones (Fig 6). Tropomyosin is one of the central elements of the sarcomeric unit, regulating interactions between actin and myosin in the muscle sarcomere. These sarcomeric units organise as a series of bands visible along the muscle fibres, and are responsible for the striated appearance of the cardiomyocytes. A regular striated cardiomyocyte structure was present throughout CTRL hearts (Fig 6A and 6B, right panels). However, at 1 dpa near the amputation site, a marked increase of tropomyosin labelling was observed in some fibres (Fig 6C, left panel) and a considerable disorganisation of sarcomere structure was evident (Fig 6C, right panel). At 7 dpa the striated structure was absent (Fig 6E, right panel). Sarcomere structure was then partially restored at 1 and 6 mpa (Fig 6G–6I, right panels), but did not completely recover to a state as orderly as CTRL at 11 mpa (Fig 6 compare A with K, right panels). Conversely, at each time-point post-amputation, the striated structure in the remote zone was similar to CTRL, as no sign of disorganisation was observed (Fig 6B, 6D, 6F, 6H and 6J). Note, the myocardium in the remote zone appeared to contain more interstitial fibronectin at 1, 6 and 11 mpa, highlighted by a “yellowish” colour all around the cardiomyocytes (Fig 6 compare B, D, F to H, J and L). As supplemental controls, we performed fibronectin, WGA and NPPA immuno-labelling (S4A-S4N Fig) on SHAM hearts collected 11 months post-operation (SHAM 11 mpa), and its corresponding CTRL (CTRL 11 mpa). We showed that there was no difference in all immuno-labelling performed, between CTRL 11 mpa, SHAM 11 mpa (S4A–S4N Fig) and the 11-months “younger” CTRL (i.e. the 11 months-less non-amputated control heart) used in other figures (compare S4A–S4N Fig to Fig 3A and 3B, Fig 5A–5C, and Fig 6A and 6B). Interestingly, cross-sectional cardiomyocyte areas for the CTRL 11 mpa were increased compared to the “younger” CTRL (S4O Fig), revealing a probable cell hypertrophy induced by aging. Nevertheless, compared to CTRL 11 mpa and SHAM 11 mpa that had no difference in cross-sectional cardiomyocyte area, a significantly increased cell area in AMP 11 mpa strongly indicated injury-induced hypertrophy (S4O Fig).

Fig 6
Sarcomeric organisation of cardiomyocytes is deteriorated near the amputation site.

Together with cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (Figs (Figs3,3, ,44 and and5),5), altered striated structure (Fig 6) suggested that myocardium was largely disorganised locally, at the amputation site. Furthermore, this disorganisation was persistent and the sarcomeric striated structure was not fully recovered at 11 mpa.

Markers of fibrosis, hypertrophy and inflammation are up regulated during the first week post-amputation

We next investigated the immediate molecular responses of hearts from CTRL, SHAM and AMP groups (Fig 7A) during the first week following amputation (Fig 7B). We monitored genes known to be involved in the cardiac scarring process, such as fibrosis (fn1, fibronectin1; col1a1, collagen type 1 alpha 1; ctgf, connective tissue growth factor), hypertrophy (odc, ornithine decarboxylase; nppa, natriuretic peptide A; nppb natriuretic peptide B), and inflammation (cebpb, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta; il1b, interleukin 1b, cxcl8, interleukin 8).

Fig 7
Short-term transcriptional responses in adult frog heart after cardiac injury display evidence of a scarring process.

In AMP animals, fn1 expression significantly increased by 3 dpa compared to CTRL, and remained higher than both CTRL and SHAM animals at 7 dpa. A significant increase was also observed for col1a1 expression compared to CTRL at 7 dpa, whereas change in ctgf expression was not significant. The hypertrophic marker odc was significantly up regulated at each time observed for AMP compared to CTRL, and compared to SHAM at 7 dpa as well as for SHAM compared to CTRL at 1 and 3 dpa. In addition to odc, the expression of hypertrophic markers nppa and nppb was also analysed. It is known that nppa is highly expressed in the atria, however we were able to analyse any change in expression caused by cardiac injury in the ventricle alone, since our samples have had the atria removed. Unfortunately, in the short time-frame observed, the expression of nppa and nppa remained unchanged and were not upregulated in the first week following amputation. In accordance with this observation, immuno-labelling for NPPA was clearly increased from 1 mpa in the ventricle near the amputation site (Fig 5). Taken together, our data showed that expression markers of fibrosis and hypertrophy were increased early in amputated hearts and fitted with the long-term observation of fibronectin deposition and cardiac hypertrophy in injured hearts.

Similar increased expression of inflammatory markers was observed for AMP and SHAM conditions compared to CTRL. Therefore opening the pericardium in SHAM animals and ventricle resection in AMP animals provokes a similar inflammatory response, at least concerning the genes that we monitored.

No molecular evidence of increased cell proliferation or cardiomyocyte differentiation during the first week post-amputation

Cardiomyocyte proliferation is used as an index of the regenerative potential of the heart following cardiac injury [7,8]. We thus quantified expression levels of cell proliferation markers, such as the mitotic factor pcna (proliferating cell nuclear antigen), the cell cycle marker ccnd1 (cyclin D1), and tert (telomerase reverse transcriptase) (Fig 7B). For all genes tested, no significant change of expression was observed between CTRL, SHAM or AMP situations at any time-point monitored.

Two factors known to be involved in differentiation processes were also investigated: actl6a (actin like 6a, also known as baf53a), a SWI/SNF BAF-like complex member thought to prevent activation of differentiation programs [39,40], and akt1 (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1) documented as essential for initiation of muscle differentiation [41], also shown to improve fibroblasts conversion into functional cardiomyocytes [42] (Fig 7B). At 3 dpa, actl6a was up regulated in SHAM and AMP compared to CTRL, whereas akt1 was significantly down regulated in AMP compared to CTRL and lower in AMP than SHAM (p = 0.0922).

These results indirectly suggested that the adult ventricle was unable to mount a proliferative response and to differentiate novel cardiomyocytes after injury.

Expression of sarcomere components is altered early after amputation

Given that we observed an alteration of the striated structure of cardiomyocytes at the injured site (Fig 6), we quantified the expression of genes encoding proteins of the sarcomeric apparatus tnnt2 (troponin T type 2) and actn3 (actinin alpha 3) (Fig 7B). Both genes encode proteins that participate in the sarcomeric unit assembly, are essential to maintain the Z-disc structure, and play a role in muscle contraction [4345]. Interestingly, these genes were down regulated in AMP compared to CTRL at 3 and 7 dpa, especially tnnt2, which was also down regulated compared to SHAM at 3 dpa (Fig 7B). This result corresponded with the lasting altered sarcomeres observed in cardiomyocytes close to the amputation site (Fig 6). Alternately, this could be due to an increase in the ratio of non-myocytes (infiltrating cells or fibroblasts) to cardiomyocytes.

Discussion

Investigating cardiac regenerative potential is of importance to develop therapy. In adult humans, there is an absence of cardiomyocyte regeneration following infarction. Instead, a fibrotic scar replaces the injured tissue, negatively impacting cardiac function and possibly leading to heart failure [2,3]. Model organisms are increasingly used and developed to understand the processes involved in regeneration, scar formation and hypertrophy in hope to reverse the adverse effects of myocardial injury in humans [4].

Currently, our knowledge of cardiac regeneration and scarring processes is dominated by data obtained from zebrafish and mouse models [49,30,31,46]. Vertebrate cardiac regenerative capacity has recently been discussed in an evolutionary and comparative context [26]. These authors highlight the potential of using alternate models to explore the consequences of heart injury. Remarkably, with the exception of medaka that has not regenerated the ventricle by 60 dpa [47], it is between the evolutionary separated teleost (zebrafish) and mammal (mouse) that adult capacity to regenerate the heart is lost, but the mechanisms underlying the proximal (i.e. physiological) and ultimate (i.e. evolutionary) [48] causes of this difference remain unknown. This is why amphibians, positioned between these two models in the vertebrate evolutionary tree, are of particular interest. Even though novel data has been obtained for urodeles [4951], knowledge remains scarce for anurans. To update and develop the limited data from the initial 1870s and 1960s studies [2123], we introduced Xenopus laevis as a contemporary model to analyse cardiac injury, using a method designed to be less invasive than those already described.

Presently, the main procedures adopted to cause cardiac injury in vertebrate models are cryoinjury or tissue removal by resection that damage between 10% and 30% of the ventricular chamber, and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery ligation that causes approximately 60% to 75% of cardiomyocyte loss. Interestingly, LAD is the more popular method for investigating cardiac repair in non-regenerating warm-blooded species. Whereas in the regenerating cold-blooded species, physical cardiac damage by heat, cold and tissue removal methods are mainly used [26].

When assessing available heart injury methods applicable to amphibians, important factors to consider are the fact that damage to the ventral abdominal vein can be detrimental [33] and that a pectoral girdle and cartilaginous sternum cover the heart preventing easy access [52]. In urodele studies, an open surgery method was used to perform a ventricular amputation [16,17,50]. However, it was shown that the procedure used to gain access to the ventricle was sufficient to induce fibrosis and cardiomyocyte cell cycle re-entry in 1 day-old mice [31]. It is therefore possible that open surgery has a similar impact on amphibian heart. Further, a general problem associated with any method is the invasiveness of the surgery, which can cause significant stress during and after the operation. As it has been shown that stress can be detrimental to heart regeneration in zebrafish [53], this might be a source of artefactual responses during the regenerative process.

In an endeavour to reduce stress, we optimised a minimally invasive endoscopy-guided surgical procedure and applied it to investigate the response to injury after resection of adult Xenopus heart ventricle. Compared to the methods described above, using endoscopy to cause cardiac injury can be considered less severe, with minimal trauma, discomfort and stress [33,54]. As previously demonstrated, this method is rapid, allows live visualisation of all coelomic organs, including their size and colour, providing spatial awareness around structures from a 3-mm single paramedian entry point [33,54]. In addition, the amount of tissue collected is standardised by biopsy forceps size, increasing the reproducibility of the extent of inflicted damage; we estimated that 4% of ventricle volume was amputated in our experiments. Standardisation has the benefit of eliminating potential variation in the results arising from technical difficulties like different injury sizes, an issue that was proposed to explain different cardiac regeneration results observed in mice [9,30,31,46]. If amphibian endoscopy is performed correctly, complications are rare, although iatrogenic trauma can occur, as can buoyancy issues if CO2 remains from insufflation after suture [33]. We did not experience any endoscopy related difficulties during these experiments; 100% of animals survived the optimised procedure itself and thereafter >94% survived until the predetermined sacrifice time-point.

Applying our technique, we showed that adult Xenopus heart mounts a similar inflammatory response in SHAM and in AMP conditions when compared to CTRL (Fig 7B). Given the important roles of the pericardium in cardiac function [55] it is probably not surprising that frog ventricles display marked signs of inflammation, even in the SHAM group.

Another feature of the early response of Xenopus ventricle to injury was the up regulation of genes participating in fibrosis (fn1, col1a1) and hypertrophy, (odc) (Fig 7), two main signs of a scarring process [5,56]. At the tissue level, fibrosis and hypertrophy were evident and long lasting. Fibrotic deposition and hypertrophy increased over time, becoming progressively more invasive at the amputation site, notably from 1 mpa (Figs (Figs2,2, ,3,3, ,4,4, ,55 and and6,6, and S2 and S3 Figs). Further, from 1 mpa onwards, interstitial fibrosis also increased in remote areas of the heart, in cardiac tissue not directly affected by the injury (Fig 6). Conversely, hypertrophy remained in the vicinity of the injury (Figs (Figs3,3, ,44 and and5,5, and S2 and S3 Figs). Importantly, myocardial wall continuity was not restored even 11 months after amputation, with fibronectin scar still filling gaps in the tissue (Fig 1L and 1L’, Fig 6K, left panel).

Concurrent with fibrosis and hypertrophy, we observed marked sarcomere disorganisation around the amputation site (Fig 6). This disassembly took place as early as 1 dpa (Fig 6), and was associated with a significant decrease in expression of genes coding for two important actors of the sarcomere, actn3 and tnnt2 (Fig 7). Although data is limited regarding cardiac muscle, actn3 plays a role in skeletal muscle sarcomere structure, organisation and function. In mammals, reduced ACTN3 has been shown to decrease muscle mass, lower contractile properties and increase susceptibility to muscle damage [43,57,58]. In humans and zebrafish, TNNT2 function is known to be required for proper cardiac sarcomere assembly and heart contractility [5962]. Therefore, decreased actn3 and tnnt2 expression after injury in Xenopus heart is likely involved in the observed sarcomere disassembly and might result in decreased contractility in the vicinity of the injured area.

Sarcomeric disorganisation preceding the proliferative step is an initial feature of cardiac regeneration in zebrafish and neonatal mice, occurring in the first week following injury [7,8]. Similarly, initial disassembly of the sarcomere structure was also observed, preceding mono-nucleated cardiomyocyte division in adult mice heart stimulated to regenerate [63]. However, in Xenopus, we did not observe a concomitant change in the expression levels of genes encoding for the proliferative factors pcna, ccnd1 and tert (Fig 7). Furthermore, if partially recovered at 1 mpa, sarcomeric disarray was not transient as in zebrafish, still being present at 6 and 11 mpa (Fig 6). Our data thus suggested that sarcomeric disorganisation in injured adult Xenopus heart did not promote cell renewal but rather reflected a return to a foetal-like phenotype as has been reported to occur in failing adult mammalian hearts [64].

We also observed that akt1 expression was significantly decreased 3 dpa (Fig 7). This gene encodes for an integrator of cell signalling, with pleiotropic actions. In mammalian cardiomyocytes, AKT activity is literally involved in all aspects of cell function including contractility, survival, metabolism, growth and hypertrophy; at the organ level it has cardio-protective effect against pressure-overload induced heart failure [65]. This factor was also shown to improve fibroblast conversion into cardiomyocyte in vitro [42]. Given the central role of AKT activity in heart tissue, it is thus not inconceivable that decreased akt1 expression (Fig 7) might adversely affect the regenerative process.

These observations demonstrated that no regeneration took place up to almost one-year post-amputation in the frog heart. Hence, Xenopus differs from urodele amphibians and zebrafish that do regenerate their heart after damage.

Multiple authors have proposed that during evolution, the capacity to regenerate the heart was lost concurrently with the gain of homeothermy, and that features linked with poikilothermy such as low metabolic rate, low cardiac workload and trabecular organisation of the heart, are permissive for regeneration [26,6668]. Our results show that the trabecular heart of the cold-blooded Xenopus laevis cannot regenerate and therefore are at odds with this hypothesis. In fact, the way that Xenopus heart responds to damage is reminiscent to that of warm-blooded adult mammals: no regeneration, hypertrophy to compensate the lost contractile ability, persistent scarring to maintain organ continuity and prevent rupture of the ventricular wall [28]. This raises an interesting question: was cardiac regenerative capacity lost in basal tetrapods and regained in urodeles or lost independently in anurans (or at least Xenopus laevis) and amniotes? The fact that, among teleosts, the medaka is also known to be unable to regenerate its heart ventricle might favour the later [47]. Comparative studies will be needed to clarify this point.

The long-term disarray of sarcomeric structure in adult Xenopus heart, associated with the absence of regenerative capacity and persistent fibrosis and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, suggested an alteration of the structural and functional properties of the myocardial tissue. It would be interesting to monitor heart function in frogs before, immediately after, and at different time points following amputation. This might be investigated using advanced echocardiography with modern speckle-tracking analyses to detect changes in cardiac performance, since it has successfully been applied to zebrafish to monitor cardiac functional recovery after amputation [69]. Other techniques can be applied like positron emission tomography (PET) as tested on pigs following induced myocardial infarction [70] or optical coherence tomography, which was used on tadpoles [71].

Conclusion

In addition to a novel cardiac amputation procedure, we propose a contemporary vertebrate model with absence of heart regeneration to study myocardial injury and repair after tissue removal (Fig 8). This should provide a valuable future tool to explore the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie the scarring process after heart injury. Data obtained in our Xenopus model of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy could also prove relevant for translational medicine including hypertrophy regression. Moreover, the endoscopy technique, potentially transferrable to other species in the future, could help in translating the collected information into therapies aimed at salvaging and repairing failing human hearts.

Fig 8
Endoscopic ventricle biopsy procedure in adult frogs induces a fibrous scar with absence of heart regeneration.

Supporting information

S1 Fig

Video recording screen shots of endoscopy-guided heart resection in Xenopus.

(A) A surgically prepared Xenopus in dorsal recumbence on the operating table with endoscope inserted inside. (B) The falciform ligament (light gold pattern) covering the heart (silver pattern). (C) The falciform ligament was broken (black arrow) to reveal the pericardium-covered heart (white arrow). (D) The pericardium was opened. (E) The heart was grabbed with the biopsy forceps. (F) The site of heart amputation (white arrow). (See S1 File).

(TIF)

S2 Fig

Increasing cell hypertrophy occurs at the amputated site of adult frog heart.

Sections labelled to reveal membranes (WGA, red), cardiomyocytes (CH1, green) and nuclei (DAPI, blue), for a control non-amputated heart (CTRL) compared to 1 and 7 dpa, and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 11 mpa. A progressive extension and intensification of WGA labelling, which is an indication of hypertrophy, was observed in cardiomyocytes localised around the amputation site: At 1 dpa and 7 dpa, hypertrophy was not detectable in the vicinity of amputation site (*), whereas an increase of WGA labelling was observed starting at 1 mpa and enlarging and intensifying up to 11mpa. Animals: CTRL, n = 2; 1dpa, n = 1; 7dpa, n = 2; 1mpa, n = 3; 2mpa, n = 3; 3mpa, n = 2; 6mpa, n = 2, 11mpa, n = 2. Scale bars, 500 μm.

(TIF)

S3 Fig

Coronal view reveals hypertrophic cardiomyocytes at the amputation site.

Magnification of coronal views of WGA-labelled cardiomyocytes observed at the site of amputation (top) and in a remote zone of the amputated ventricle (bottom), for a control non-amputated heart (CTRL) compared to different times after amputation (1 and 7 dpa and 1, 6 and 11 mpa). As in Fig 3, an increase of the thickness of the WGA signal was observed starting from 1 mpa and still present at 11 mpa compared to the control, but no difference was evidenced in the remote zone. Animals: CTRL, n = 2; 1dpa, n = 1; 7dpa, n = 2; 1mpa, n = 3; 6mpa, n = 2, 11mpa, n = 2. Scale bars, 20 μm.

(TIF)

S4 Fig

No fibrosis or hypertrophy is observed in the heart of CTRL and SHAM frogs after eleven months.

Cardiomyocytes were observed after 11 months for control non-amputated (CTRL 11mpa, A-C and G-J) and SHAM-operated hearts (SHAM 11mpa, D-F and K-N), near the ventricle border at the equivalent amputation site (A-F) and in a remote zone of the ventricle (G-N). Immuno-labelled sections for tropomyosin (CH1, red), fibronectin (fn, green) and DAPI-counterstained nuclei (blue), for CTRL (A, G, and corresponding magnification) and SHAM (D, K, and corresponding magnification) showed no difference in sarcomere organisation at the border or in a remote zone of the ventricle. On magnifications, the tropomyosin signal revealed a thin and well-organised striated structure of the cardiomyocytes for CTRL and SHAM hearts. Using WGA labelling (cell membranes, red) and DAPI (nuclei, blue), no difference was observed between CTRL and SHAM at the ventricle border (compare B and E) or in the remote zone (compare H and L). On the right of each picture, a post treatment of the red/WGA images allows better visualisation of the signal intensity (B’, E’, H’ and L’). Note that the myocardium showed a comparable level of labelling in the border or in the remote zone of the ventricle, with a stronger signal in the epicardium. Immuno-labelled sections for tropomyosin (CH1, red), natriuretic peptide A (NPPA, green) and DAPI-counterstained nuclei (blue), confirmed the absence of hypertrophic signal in CTRL 11mpa and SHAM 11mpa hearts (compare C and F for the border, I and M for the remote zone). The NPPA signal in the atrium (J and N) was used as a labelling control, as nppa is highly expressed in this tissue. (O) The cross-sectional area of WGA-labelled cardiomyocytes was compared showing no difference between CTRL 11mpa and SHAM 11mpa, whereas cell area was significantly increased for AMP 11mpa, revealing hypertrophic cardiomyocytes at the site of amputation. A slight increase was also seen between both CTRLs separated by 11 months, which suggested an aging effect. Count was performed on 2 or 3 independent heart sections, corresponding to minima of 300 cell areas for each group. An unpaired non-parametric t-test (Mann Whitney) was performed: ****, p<0.0001; ns, non-significant. Scale bars, 200 μm (A–N), 20 μm (magnification).

(TIF)

S1 Table

Primer sequences used for Real-Time q-PCR experiments.

For each primer pair, the forward and reverse sequences are given. Most genes studied were known as a single copy when this study was conducted except cebpb and ccnd1; these primers allowed the amplification of both cebpb homeologs but only a single ccnd1 homeolog. Target of Xenopus laevis long (.L) or short chromosome (.S) follows the gene name.

(DOCX)

S2 Table

Detail of experimental design listing for each independent amputation series and the different time points used for sample collection.

The total number of adult Xenopus laevis that followed the complete endoscopic procedure and whether they were used for a long-term or short-term analysis.

(TIF)

S1 File

Key Steps during the endoscopy-guided cardiac amputation in Xenopus laevis.

A view of a frog on an operating table (white arrow) with an endoscope inserted inside and the in situ live visualisation on a screen (black arrow). The next clips show the falciform ligament being opened, the pericardium opened and a piece of the heart amputated during the ventricular diastole. The wound is then closed using a single suture. (Videos are courtesy of Norin Chai, DVM, MSc, PhD, Paris, France.)

(WMV)

Acknowledgments

We thank Gérard Benisti, Philippe Durand and Jean-Paul Chaumeil for outstanding animal care, Alice Algan for help with RT-qPCR, Léa Méloni for help with cell area quantification, Giovanni Levi, Jean-Baptiste Fini and our colleagues for manuscript feedback. The anti-Atrial Natriuretic Peptide antibody was generously provided by Dr. Hmadcha Abdelkrim, CABIMER Seville Spain (Horrillo A et al. Cell Death Dis. 2013; 4:e570). We acknowledge the ImagoSeine core facility of the Institut Jacques Monod, member of IBiSA and the France-BioImaging (ANR-10-INBS-04) infrastructure.

Funding Statement

The research leading to these results has received funding from EU Grant Crescendo and the French PNR-PE Program, by Watchfrog S.A. under CIFRE Convention 216/2011 Ph.D. fellowship (to C. V.) and the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7-2013 under REA grant agreement n°607142, DevCom Ph.D fellowship (to L. M.).

Data Availability

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

References

1. World Health Organisation. The top 10 causes of death. 2014. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/ (accessed 11 Oct 2016).
2. Hill JA, Olson EN (2008) Cardiac plasticity. N Engl J Med 358: 1370–1380. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072139 [PubMed]
3. Xie M, Burchfield JS, Hill JA (2013) Pathological ventricular remodeling: mechanisms: part 1 of 2. Circulation 128: 388–400. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001878 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Gamba L, Harrison M, Lien CL (2014) Cardiac regeneration in model organisms. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 16: 288 doi: 10.1007/s11936-013-0288-8 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Uygur A, Lee RT (2016) Mechanisms of Cardiac Regeneration. Dev Cell 36: 362–374. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.01.018 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Poss KD, Wilson LG, Keating MT (2002) Heart regeneration in zebrafish. Science 298: 2188–2190. doi: 10.1126/science.1077857 [PubMed]
7. Jopling C, Sleep E, Raya M, Marti M, Raya A, et al. (2010) Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nature 464: 606–609. doi: 10.1038/nature08899 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Simpson E, Hill JA, Richardson JA, et al. (2011) Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science 331: 1078–1080. doi: 10.1126/science.1200708 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Polizzotti BD, Ganapathy B, Haubner BJ, Penninger JM, Kuhn B (2016) A cryoinjury model in neonatal mice for cardiac translational and regeneration research. Nat Protoc 11: 542–552. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.031 [PubMed]
10. Warkman AS, Krieg PA (2007) Xenopus as a model system for vertebrate heart development. Semin Cell Dev Biol 18: 46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.11.010 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Burggren WW, Warburton S (2007) Amphibians as animal models for laboratory research in physiology. ILAR J 48: 260–269. [PubMed]
12. Heinz-Taheny KM (2009) Cardiovascular physiology and diseases of amphibians. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 12: 39–50, v-vi. doi: 10.1016/j.cvex.2008.08.005 [PubMed]
13. Hempel A, Kühl M (2016) A Matter of the Heart: The African Clawed Frog Xenopus as a Model for Studying Vertebrate Cardiogenesis and Congenital Heart Defects. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 3: 21.
14. Vargas-Gonzalez A, Prado-Zayago E, Leon-Olea M, Guarner-Lans V, Cano-Martinez A (2005) [Myocardial regeneration in Ambystoma mexicanum after surgical injury]. Arch Cardiol Mex 75 Suppl 3: S3-21–29. [PubMed]
15. Cano-Martinez A, Vargas-Gonzalez A, Guarner-Lans V, Prado-Zayago E, Leon-Oleda M, et al. (2010) Functional and structural regeneration in the axolotl heart (Ambystoma mexicanum) after partial ventricular amputation. Arch Cardiol Mex 80: 79–86. [PubMed]
16. Oberpriller JO, Oberpriller JC (1974) Response of the adult newt ventricle to injury. J Exp Zool 187: 249–253. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401870208 [PubMed]
17. Becker R, Chapin S, Sherry R (1974) Regeneration of the ventricular myocardium in amphibians. Nature 248: 145–147. [PubMed]
18. Borchardt T, Braun T (2007) Cardiovascular regeneration in non-mammalian model systems: What are the differences between newts and man? Thrombosis and Haemostasis 98: 311–318. [PubMed]
19. Witman N, Murtuza B, Davis B, Arner A, Morrison JI (2011) Recapitulation of developmental cardiogenesis governs the morphological and functional regeneration of adult newt hearts following injury. Dev Biol 354: 67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.03.021 [PubMed]
20. Liu LS, Zhao LY, Wang SH, Jiang JP (2016) Research proceedings on amphibian model organisms. Dongwuxue Yanjiu 37: 237–245. doi: 10.13918/j.issn.2095-8137.2016.4.237 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Zielonko J (1874) Pathologisch-anatomische und experimentelle Studien über Hypertrophie des Herzens. Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin 62: 29–57.
22. Rumyantsev PP (1977) Interrelations of the Proliferation and Differentiation Processes during Cardiac Myogenesis and Regeneration. 51: 187–273. [PubMed]
23. Rumyantsev PP (1961) Evidence of regeneration of significant parts of myocardial fibers of frogs after trauma (Russian). Arkh Anat Gistol Embriol 376: 65–74.
24. Rumyantsev PP (1973) Post-injury DNA synthesis, mitosis and ultrastructural reorganization of adult frog cardiac myocytes. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie 139: 431–450. [PubMed]
25. Poss KD (2010) Advances in understanding tissue regenerative capacity and mechanisms in animals. Nat Rev Genet 11: 710–722. doi: 10.1038/nrg2879 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Vivien CJ, Hudson JE, Porrello ER (2016) Evolution, comparative biology and ontogeny of vertebrate heart regeneration. npj Regenerative Medicine 1: 16012.
27. Klocke R, Tian W, Kuhlmann MT, Nikol S (2007) Surgical animal models of heart failure related to coronary heart disease. Cardiovasc Res 74: 29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.11.026 [PubMed]
28. Porrello ER, Olson EN (2014) A neonatal blueprint for cardiac regeneration. Stem Cell Res 13: 556–570. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2014.06.003 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Dickover MS, Zhang R, Han P, Chi NC (2013) Zebrafish cardiac injury and regeneration models: a noninvasive and invasive in vivo model of cardiac regeneration. Methods Mol Biol 1037: 463–473. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-505-7_27 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Andersen DC, Ganesalingam S, Jensen CH, Sheikh SP (2014) Do neonatal mouse hearts regenerate following heart apex resection? Stem Cell Reports 2: 406–413. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.02.008 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Bryant DM, O'Meara CC, Ho NN, Gannon J, Cai L, et al. (2015) A systematic analysis of neonatal mouse heart regeneration after apical resection. J Mol Cell Cardiol 79: 315–318. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.12.011 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Konfino T, Landa N, Ben-Mordechai T, Leor J (2015) The type of injury dictates the mode of repair in neonatal and adult heart. J Am Heart Assoc 4: e001320 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001320 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Chai N (2015) Endoscopy in Amphibians. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 18: 479–491. doi: 10.1016/j.cvex.2015.04.006 [PubMed]
34. Coen L, Le Blay K, Rowe I, Demeneix BA (2007) Caspase-9 regulates apoptosis/proliferation balance during metamorphic brain remodeling in Xenopus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 8502–8507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608877104 [PubMed]
35. Rasband WS, ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997–2016.
36. Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, et al. (2012) Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinformatics 13: 134 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-134 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Orntoft TF (2004) Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res 64: 5245–5250. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496 [PubMed]
38. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25: 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [PubMed]
39. Bao X, Tang J, Lopez-Pajares V, Tao S, Qu K, et al. (2013) ACTL6a enforces the epidermal progenitor state by suppressing SWI/SNF-dependent induction of KLF4. Cell Stem Cell 12: 193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.12.014 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Krasteva V, Buscarlet M, Diaz-Tellez A, Bernard MA, Crabtree GR, et al. (2012) The BAF53a subunit of SWI/SNF-like BAF complexes is essential for hemopoietic stem cell function. Blood 120: 4720–4732. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-427047 [PubMed]
41. Gardner S, Anguiano M, Rotwein P (2012) Defining Akt actions in muscle differentiation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 303: C1292–1300. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00259.2012 [PubMed]
42. Zhou H, Dickson ME, Kim MS, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN (2015) Akt1/protein kinase B enhances transcriptional reprogramming of fibroblasts to functional cardiomyocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112: 11864–11869. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516237112 [PubMed]
43. MacArthur DG, North KN (2004) A gene for speed? The evolution and function of alpha-actinin-3. Bioessays 26: 786–795. doi: 10.1002/bies.20061 [PubMed]
44. Nishii K, Morimoto S, Minakami R, Miyano Y, Hashizume K, et al. (2008) Targeted disruption of the cardiac troponin T gene causes sarcomere disassembly and defects in heartbeat within the early mouse embryo. Dev Biol 322: 65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.07.007 [PubMed]
45. Holterhoff CK, Saunders RH, Brito EE, Wagner DS (2009) Sequence and expression of the zebrafish alpha-actinin gene family reveals conservation and diversification among vertebrates. Dev Dyn 238: 2936–2947. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22123 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Andersen DC, Jensen CH, Baun C, Hvidsten S, Zebrowski DC, et al. (2016) Persistent scarring and dilated cardiomyopathy suggest incomplete regeneration of the apex resected neonatal mouse myocardium—A 180 days follow up study. J Mol Cell Cardiol 90: 47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.11.031 [PubMed]
47. Ito K, Morioka M, Kimura S, Tasaki M, Inohaya K, et al. (2014) Differential reparative phenotypes between zebrafish and medaka after cardiac injury. Dev Dyn 243: 1106–1115. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.24154 [PubMed]
48. Karmon A, Pilpel Y (2016) Biological causal links on physiological and evolutionary time scales. Elife 5: e14424 doi: 10.7554/eLife.14424 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Mercer SE, Odelberg SJ, Simon HG (2013) A dynamic spatiotemporal extracellular matrix facilitates epicardial-mediated vertebrate heart regeneration. Dev Biol 382: 457–469. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.08.002 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Simon HG, Odelberg S (2015) Assessing cardiomyocyte proliferative capacity in the newt heart and primary culture. Methods Mol Biol 1290: 227–240. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2495-0_18 [PubMed]
51. Nakamura R, Koshiba-Takeuchi K, Tsuchiya M, Kojima M, Miyazawa A, et al. (2016) Expression analysis of Baf60c during heart regeneration in axolotls and neonatal mice. Dev Growth Differ 58: 367–382. doi: 10.1111/dgd.12281 [PubMed]
52. Gilchrist J, Bonde C (1919) Dissection of the platana and the frog. Cape Town: Cape Times.
53. Sallin P, Jazwinska A (2016) Acute stress is detrimental to heart regeneration in zebrafish. Open Biol 6: 160012 doi: 10.1098/rsob.160012 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Chai N (2016) Surgery in Amphibians. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 19: 77–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cvex.2015.08.004 [PubMed]
55. Jaworska-Wilczynska M, Trzaskoma P, Szczepankiewicz AA, Hryniewiecki T (2016) Pericardium: structure and function in health and disease. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 54: 121–125. doi: 10.5603/FHC.a2016.0014 [PubMed]
56. Xiang MS, Kikuchi K (2016) Endogenous Mechanisms of Cardiac Regeneration. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 326: 67–131. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.04.002 [PubMed]
57. Yang N, Garton F, North K (2009) alpha-actinin-3 and performance. Med Sport Sci 54: 88–101. doi: 10.1159/000235698 [PubMed]
58. Seto JT, Lek M, Quinlan KG, Houweling PJ, Zheng XF, et al. (2011) Deficiency of alpha-actinin-3 is associated with increased susceptibility to contraction-induced damage and skeletal muscle remodeling. Hum Mol Genet 20: 2914–2927. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr196 [PubMed]
59. Becker JR, Deo RC, Werdich AA, Panakova D, Coy S, et al. (2011) Human cardiomyopathy mutations induce myocyte hyperplasia and activate hypertrophic pathways during cardiogenesis in zebrafish. Dis Model Mech 4: 400–410. doi: 10.1242/dmm.006148 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Sehnert AJ, Huq A, Weinstein BM, Walker C, Fishman M, et al. (2002) Cardiac troponin T is essential in sarcomere assembly and cardiac contractility. Nat Genet 31: 106–110. doi: 10.1038/ng875 [PubMed]
61. Huang W, Zhang R, Xu X (2009) Myofibrillogenesis in the developing zebrafish heart: A functional study of tnnt2. Dev Biol 331: 237–249. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.039 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Chen J (2013) Impaired cardiovascular function caused by different stressors elicits a common pathological and transcriptional response in zebrafish embryos. Zebrafish 10: 389–400. doi: 10.1089/zeb.2013.0875 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Bersell K, Arab S, Haring B, Kuhn B (2009) Neuregulin1/ErbB4 signaling induces cardiomyocyte proliferation and repair of heart injury. Cell 138: 257–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.060 [PubMed]
64. Szibor M, Poling J, Warnecke H, Kubin T, Braun T (2014) Remodeling and dedifferentiation of adult cardiomyocytes during disease and regeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci 71: 1907–1916. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1535-6 [PubMed]
65. Sussman MA, Volkers M, Fischer K, Bailey B, Cottage CT, et al. (2011) Myocardial AKT: the omnipresent nexus. Physiol Rev 91: 1023–1070. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00024.2010 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Goss RJ (1969) Principles of regeneration. New York,: Academic Press; ix, 287 p. p.
67. Reichman OJ (1984) Evolution of Regeneration Capabilities. American Naturalist 123: 752–763.
68. Jazwinska A, Sallin P (2016) Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart. J Pathol 238: 233–246. doi: 10.1002/path.4644 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Hein SJ, Lehmann LH, Kossack M, Juergensen L, Fuchs D, et al. (2015) Advanced echocardiography in adult zebrafish reveals delayed recovery of heart function after myocardial cryoinjury. PLoS One 10: e0122665 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122665 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Teramoto N, Koshino K, Yokoyama I, Miyagawa S, Zeniya T, et al. (2011) Experimental pig model of old myocardial infarction with long survival leading to chronic left ventricular dysfunction and remodeling as evaluated by PET. J Nucl Med 52: 761–768. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.084848 [PubMed]
71. Boppart SA, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE, Southern JF, Brezinski ME, et al. (1997) Noninvasive assessment of the developing Xenopus cardiovascular system using optical coherence tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 4256–4261. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science