Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of oncotargetLink to Publisher's site
Oncotarget. 2016 October 25; 7(43): 70303–70322.
Published online 2016 September 6. doi:  10.18632/oncotarget.11854
PMCID: PMC5342554

NTS/NTR1 co-expression enhances epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and promotes tumor metastasis by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma


Neurotensin (NTS) is a neuropeptide distributed in central nervous and digestive systems. In this study, the significant association between ectopic NTS expression and tumor invasion was confirmed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In primary HCC tissues, the NTS and neurotensin receptor 1 (NTR1) co-expression (NTS+NTR1+) is a poor prognostic factor correlated with aggressive biological behaviors and poor clinical prognosis. Enhanced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) features, including decreased E-cadherin, increased β-catenin translocation and N-cadherin expression, were identified in NTS+NTR1+ HCC tissues. Varied NTS-responsible HCC cell lines were established using NTR1 genetically modified Hep3B and HepG2 cells which were used to elucidate the molecular mechanisms regulating NTS-induced EMT and tumor invasion in vitro. Results revealed that inducing exogenous NTS stimulation and enhancing NTR1 expression promoted tumor invasion rather than proliferation by accelerating EMT in HCC cells. The NTS-induced EMT was correlated with the remarkable increase in Wnt1, Wnt3, Wnt5, Axin, and p-GSK3β expression and was significantly reversed by blocking the NTS signaling via the NTR1 antagonist SR48692 or by inhibiting the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway via specific inhibitors, such as TSW119 and DKK-1. SR48692 also inhibited the metastases of NTR1-overexpressing HCC xenografts in the lungs in vivo. This finding implied that NTS may be an important stimulus to promote HCC invasion and metastasis both in vitro and in vivo, and NTS signaling enhanced the tumor EMT and invasion potentials by activating the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Therefore, NTS may be a valuable therapeutic target to prevent tumor progression in HCC.

Keywords: neurotensin, hepatocellular carcinoma, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, Wnt/β-catenin


Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the seventh-most common malignancy and third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a crucial role in the dissemination and invasion of HCC, which significantly affects clinical prognosis. Growth factors and cytokine-induced signal pathways, such as Wnt/β-catenin, TGF-β/SMAD, JAK2/STAT3, and NF-κB pathways, participate in the EMT of HCC cells [25]. Recent study in prostate cancer indicated that the acquisition of EMT features and the preservation of cancer stem cell phenotype are associated with the neuroendocrine system, which implied that neuropeptides might facilitate tumor evasion and distant metastasis by promoting the development and maintenance of EMT in cancer cells [6]. However, whether neuropeptides influences the tumor invasion and EMT of HCC remains unknown.

Neurotensin (NTS) is an endogenous neuropeptide with 13 amino acids and was first isolated from the extracts of bovine hypothalami in 1973 [7]. In the periphery, NTS is released from entero-endocrine N cells of the gastrointestinal tract and involved in digestion-related hormonal and neurocrine regulatory processes, such as inhibiting small bowel motility and gastric acid secretions, stimulating pancreatic and biliary secretions, and facilitating fatty acid absorption [8, 9]. The ectopic expression of NTS was first identified in breast cancer in 1985 [10]. Since then, the expression of NTS has been detected in pancreatic, colon, prostate and lung cancers and neuroendocrine tumors [1113]. In our previous study, the mRNA expression level of NTS is comparably increased in a special HCC subgroup characterized by an enhanced expression of inflammatory and EMT-related genes, as revealed by a comprehensive genome-wide gene expression profiling analysis of 41 cases of Asian HCC tissues [14]. In primary HCC tissues, the NTS protein is positively expressed and a series of EMT biomarkers is upregulated, as indicated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining [14]. These findings implied that NTS might promote tumor EMT in HCC.

Previous studies on the role of NTS in cancer focused on tumor growth, proliferation, and anti-apoptosis. The effects of NTS are mediated by three subtypes of neurotensin receptors (NTRs), namely, NTR1, NTR2, and SORT1; among these receptors, NTR1 exhibits the highest affinity and mediates most biological functions of NTS [15]. NTS stimulates the proliferation of NTR1-expressing human colon cancer cell lines [16]. NTR1 knockdown or NTR1 antagonist treatment reduces the proliferation of lung cancer cell line A549 in vitro and in vivo [17]. NTS enhances the proliferation of Panc-1 cell line, and the NTS antagonist SR48692 inhibits its growth in a dose-dependent manner [18]. The anti-apoptotic effects of NTS have also been detected in breast cancer cell lines and primary tumor tissues [11, 19]. NTS also participates in tumor migration and invasion. In prostate cancer, NTS stimulates tumor invasion rather than growth [20, 21]. However, the expression of NTS in HCC has been rarely explored because NTS is absent in healthy adult liver. Therefore, we investigated the expression and biological functions of NTS in tumor proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, and metastasis in HCC tissues, gene-modified HCC cell lines, and HCC xenograft-bearing mouse models to elucidate the regulatory effects of NTS signaling in HCC.

We found that NTS and NTR1 co-expression (NTS+NTR1+) was correlated with the aggressive HCC phenotypes, including incomplete envelope, portal vein invasion, early relapse, and short survival after surgery. Significantly enhanced EMT features, such as decreased E-cadherin, increased β-catenin translocation, and increased N-cadherin expression, were also identified in NTS+NTR1+ HCC samples. Exogenous NTS stimulation and NTR1 expression enhancement promoted tumor migration and invasion rather than proliferation and apoptosis in vitro. In addition to the increase in EMT markers, remarkable upregulation of Wnt1, Wnt3, Wnt5, Axin, and p-GSK3β were observed. The specific inhibitors against NTR1, Wnt, and GSK3β potently blocked the transduction of NTS signal and inhibited the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Thus, EMT was reversed and the HCC invasion capacity was attenuated in vitro and in vivo. Our study indicated that NTS signaling enhanced the tumor EMT and invasion potentials by activating the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in HCC. Therefore, NTS may be an important stimulus to promote HCC metastasis and valuable therapeutic target to prevent tumor progression.


NTS/NTR1 co-expression was correlated with aggressive phenotypes of HCC and poor clinical outcome

The expression levels of NTS and NTR1 in HCC were assessed in 100 cases of primary HCC tissues through IHC staining. Among the HCC samples, the frequencies of NTS-expressing (NTS+) and NTR1-expressing (NTR1+) tissues were 19.00% (19/100) and 41.00% (41/100), respectively. HCC cells exclusively expressed and released NTS in tumor tissues, and most of NTS-positive HCC tissues (73.68%) co-expressed NTR1. NTS-positive staining signals were exclusively detected in the cytoplasm of HCC cells. NTR1 was also observed in the cytoplasm and on the membrane of HCC cells. No positive staining of both molecules was observed in the normal adjacent tissues (Figure (Figure1a).1a). The average positive rate (PR) of the NTS+ samples was 47.3% (32.5%, 63.1%) and their average staining index (SI) was 2.65 ± 0.75. By comparison, the average PR of the NTR1+ samples was 25.0% (13.5%, 58.2%), and the average SI was 2.43 ± 0.68. This finding implied that the expression of NTS and NTR1 in HCC tissues was considerably strong, although the positive frequency was low (Figure (Figure1b).1b). Considering the correlation between multiple clinical–pathological features and both molecules in HCC tissues, we found that NTS+NTR1+ was significantly correlated with hepatic envelope completion and portal vein invasion (Table (Table1).1). We also compared the overall survival (OS) of HCC patients on the basis of the NTS and NTR1 expression. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that NTS significantly influenced the OS of HCC patients. NTS+ patients suffered from shorter OS than NTS patients did (29.56 ± 4.94 m vs. 47.67 ± 3.10 m, P = 0.010).However, the OS of NTR1+ and NTR1 patients did not significantly differ (39.08 ± 3.71 m vs. 46.28 ± 3.74 m, P = 0.223; Figure Figure1b).1b). NTS+NTR1+ patients exhibited a shorter OS of 25.36 ± 4.53 m (P = 0.020) and a higher death risk at an expected hazard ratio (HR) of 2.755 (P = 0.003) than the other patients did (Figure (Figure1b).1b). This finding implied that NTS+NTR1+ is a poor prognostic factor of HCC correlated with aggressive biological behavior and poor clinical prognosis.

Figure 1
NTS/NTR1 co-expression was correlated with aggressive phenotype and poor clinical outcome of HCC
Table 1
The correlation between NTS and/or NTR1 high expression in HCC tissues and multiple clinical-pathological features of patients

Tumor proliferation- and invasion-related biomarkers, including Ki67, MMP9, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, β-catenin, and Vimentin, were examined in 100 HCC primary tissue samples to determine whether NTS+NTR1+ promotes tumor invasion. MMP9 and multiple EMT markers, but not Ki67 protein, were significantly upregulated in NTS+NTR1+ samples compared with those in non-NTS+NTR1+ samples (P <0.001, Figure Figure1a).1a). The expression of E-cadherin remarkably decreased, and its average PR in the NTS+NTR1+ samples was lower than that in the non-NTS+NTR1+ samples [0(0, 15.25)% vs. 15.33(5.25, 37.5)%;P = 0.027]. N-cadherin on the cytomembrane and β-catenin in the cytoplasm exhibited comparable increases in the NTS+NTR1+samples compared with those in the non-NTS+NTR1+ samples [25.85(7.15, 53.75)% vs. 10.25(0, 18.5)%; P = 0.039 and 20.85(7.15, 55.45)% vs. 10.0(0, 20.65)%; P = 0.029]. Furthermore, the NTS+NTR1+was significantly associated with MMP9, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and β-catenin (P = 0.001, 0.033, 0.041, and 0.004). These results indicated that the ectopic NTS+NTR1+ promoted tumor invasion and metastasis by inducing EMT in HCC cells.

NTS/NTR1 co-expression was correlated with tumor invasion potentials of HCC cell lines

NTS was transiently expressed in embryonic liver and was not expressed in normal mature liver [22]. Our results demonstrated that NTS was expressed exclusively in HCC cells and not in normal adjacent tissues. Therefore, the expression levels of NTS and NTR1 in the normal liver cell line L02 and four HCC cell lines (7721, MHCC97L, Hep3B, and HepG2) were compared at RNA or protein levels. NTS was absent in the normal liver cell L02 but was expressed exclusively in the HCC cells; in these cells, Hep3B and HepG2 produced more NTS than the others did (Figure (Figure2a;2a; P < 0.01). We then examined the expression of the high-affinity receptor NTR1 in the four HCC cell lines. HepG2 cells expressed a higher level of NTR1 protein than the Hep3B cells did. This finding suggested that the NTS signal was stronger in HepG2 cells than in Hep3B cells (Figure (Figure2b;2b; P < 0.01). The migration and invasion of four HCC cell lines were also compared through wound healing test and Transwell invasion assay. Migration and invasion significantly differed among the four HCC cell lines. HepG2 cells displayed a higher migration capacity (Figure (Figure2c;2c; P < 0.01) and invasion potentials (Figure (Figure2d;2d; P < 0.01) than Hep3B cells did. These results implied that the NTS+NTR1+correlated with the tumor invasion potentials of HCC cell lines.

Figure 2
NTS/NTR1 co-expression was correlated with tumor invasion potentials of HCC cell lines

NTS/NTR1 co-expression promoted tumor invasion rather than proliferation of HCC cells

Genetically modified HCC cell lines were established to perform the gain of function/loss of function (GOF/LOF) of NTR1 gene. The NTR1-overexpressing HCC cells were constructed by transfecting wild-type Hep3B (Hep3Bwt) cells with recombinant retroviral vector pLVX-IRES-Puro-NTR1 and hence termed as Hep3BNTR1hi cells. The NTR1-knocked down HCC cells were constructed by silencing Hep3Bwt and HepG2wt cells with specific NTR1 siRNAs and thus termed as Hep3BNTR1si and HepG2NTR1si cells (Figure S1a). In RT-qPCR assay and Western blot, the NTR1 expression in Hep3BNTR1hi cells was 17.16 ± 2.17-fold higher than that in Hep3Bwt cells (P < 0.01). By contrast, the NTR1 expression in Hep3BNTR1si and HepG2NTR1si cells decreased to (10.33 ± 2.51)% and (11.65 ± 1.62)% of their respective wild-type controls 48 h post-transfection (P < 0.01). However, the secretion of NTS did not change significantly among various genetically modified HCC cells (Figure S1b). This finding showed that stable NTS levels were maintained, although the NTR1 expression was regulated. We then stimulated genetically modified HCC cells with exogenous NTS at a concentration of 1 μg/ml to observe the change in tumor invasion potentials and EMT features and to mimic the strong NTS stimulation in primary HCC tissues.

BrdU proliferation assay was performed to compare the proliferation among various genetically modified HCC cell lines. No significant difference was observed among the proliferation rates of Hep3Bwt, Hep3BNTR1hi, and Hep3BNTR1si cells: 27.93% ± 2.78%, 29.13% ± 4.02%, and 26.20% ± 9.20%, respectively. The proliferation rate did not increase significantly after exogenous NTS stimulation was added (Figure (Figure3a).3a). Annexin V apoptosis assay was conducted to examine the apoptosis among various genetically modified HCC cell lines. No significant difference was detected among the Hep3Bwt, Hep3BNTR1hi, and Hep3BNTR1si cells regardless of the presence or absence of exogenous NTS stimulation (Figure (Figure3b).3b). Similar results were obtained in HepG2wt and HepG2NTR1si cells (Figure S2a/b). These results reveal that the NTS+NTR1+ did not affect the proliferation and apoptosis of HCC cells.

Figure 3
NTS/NTR1 co-expression promoted tumor invasion rather than proliferation of HCC cells

The migration and invasion of genetically modified HCC cells were evaluated through wound healing test and Transwell invasion assay. The wound closure rates (WCRs) of the Hep3BNTR1hi cell (67.20% ± 4.76%) were significantly higher than those of the Hep3Bwt (48.50% ± 3.50%) and Hep3BNTR1si (29.23% ± 3.66%) cells (P < 0.001; Figure Figure3c).3c). Furthermore, more Hep3BNTR1hi cells migrated across the Matrigel layer than Hep3Bwt and Hep3BNTR1si cells, which were 82.67 ± 8.74, 56.67 ± 4.73, and 40.33 ± 4.93 cells/104 cells after 48 h (P < 0.001; Figure Figure3d).3d). Subsequently, 1 μg/ml of exogenous NTS was added. The 48 h WCRs of the NTS-treated Hep3Bwt and Hep3BNTR1hi cells increased significantly compared with that of the NTS-untreated Hep3Bwt and Hep3BNTR1hi cells, which were 62.00% ± 2.96% versus 48.50% ± 3.80% (P = 0.008) and 95.50% ± 2.40% versus 67.20% ± 4.76% (P = 0.001), respectively. However, the WCRs did not significantly increase between the NTS-treated Hep3BNTR1si and NTS-untreated Hep3BNTR1si cells (Figure (Figure3c).3c). Consistently, more cells migrated in the NTS-treated Hep3Bwt and Hep3BNTR1hi cells than in the NTS-untreated cells, which were 71.67 ± 5.01 cells/104 cells versus 56.67 ± 4.73 cells/104 cells (P = 0.001) and 169.33 ± 14.64 cells/104 cells versus 82.67 ± 8.74 cells/104 cells (P = 0.014), respectively. No significant increase in the migrated cells was observed between the NTS-treated Hep3BNTR1si and NTS-untreated Hep3BNTR1si cells (Figure (Figure3d).3d). Similar results were obtained in HepG2wt and HepG2NTR1si cells (Figure S2c/d). These results implied that the NTS+NTR1+ significantly promoted tumor migration and invasion rather than stimulated the proliferation and apoptosis of HCC cells.

NTS/NTR1 co-expression significantly promoted EMT process in HCC cell lines

We detected the expression of well-known EMT-related protein markers and some transcription factors (TFs), including E-cadherin, N-cadherin, β-catenin, Snail, and Slug, through RT-qPCR assay and Western blot to demonstrate how NTS+NTR1+ promoted HCC invasion and migration. The results demonstrated that the E-cadherin expression in Hep3BNTR1hi cells decreased compared with that in Hep3Bwt cells (P < 0.001), but the expression levels of N-cadherin and β-catenin increased significantly (P < 0.005; Figure Figure4a).4a). In Hep3BNTR1si and HepG2NTR1si cells, the expression levels of N-cadherin and β-catenin were lower than those of Hep3Bwt and HepG2wt cells (P < 0.05; Figure Figure4a).4a). Consistent results were obtained through Western blot. N-cadherin and β-catenin proteins significantly increased in Hep3BNTR1hi cells but decreased in Hep3BNTR1si and HepG2NTR1si cells (Figure (Figure4b).4b). After 1 μg/ml of exogenous NTS was added, E-cadherin expression decreased and N-cadherin and β-catenin expression increased in Hep3Bwt, Hep3BNTR1hi, and HepG2wt cells (P < 0.05; Figure Figure4b).4b). Snail protein increased after the NTR1 expression was enhanced and exogenous NTS stimulation was induced. This finding was consistent with the decrease in E-Cadherin in the cytoplasm. We examined the distribution of N-cadherin on the cytomembrane through immunofluorescence (IF) to determine NTS-induced alteration of EMT markers in HCC further. The IF results were consistent with the observations in the Western blot assay, where N-cadherin increased in the Hep3BNTR1hicells and exogenous NTS-stimulated Hep3Bwtand Hep3BNTR1hicells but decreased in the Hep3BNTR1sicells regardless of the NTS stimulation (P < 0.05; Figure Figure4c).4c). These results suggested that the NTS+NTR1+stimulated the tumor EMT at RNA and protein levels in HCC.

Figure 4
NTS/NTR1 co-expression significantly promoted EMT process in HCC cell lines

NTS-induced EMT correlated with the activation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway

Various signaling pathways reported to induce EMT in common cancer cells were analyzed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms regulating the NTS-induced EMT in HCC cells. A comprehensive pathway analysis focused on 84 EMT-related genes was conducted through quantitative PCR array. Three different patterns of gene expression profiling were distinguished. The combination of 29 genes displayed a consistent lower expression in Hep3Bwt cells but higher expression in Hep3BNTR1hi cells and NTS-treated Hep3Bwt cells (Figure (Figure5a).5a). After the pathway was enriched, these 29 genes were distributed on three well-known EMT-related signaling pathways: Wnt, TGF-β, and integrin pathways (Figure (Figure5b).5b). We listed all the genes along these three pathways, compared their expressions in the four groups, and found the most differentially expressed genes were concentrated on the Wnt pathway. After enhancing the NTS signaling by adding exogenous NTS stimulation and/or upregulating the NTR1 expression, the expressions of CTNNB1, WNT5A, WNT 5B, and WNT11 genes dramatically increased to more than two-fold in the Hep3BNTR1hi and NTS-treated Hep3Bwt cells compared with those in the NTS-untreated Hep3Bwt controls (Figure (Figure5b).5b). Consistently, Hep3BNTR1si cells expressed lower levels of Wnt5a, Wnt5b, and Wnt11 than the Hep3Bwt controls (data not shown). These data indicated that the NTS+NTR1+ stimulated the RNA synthesis of Wnt and β-catenin genes. Similarly, the protein expression of the Wnt family, including Wnt1, Wnt3, and Wnt5, was examined using Western blot (Figure (Figure5c).5c). The results showed that exogenous NTS stimulation and NTR1 expression upregulation promoted the production of all Wnt subtypes. Furthermore, we detected the expression and phosphorylation levels of some key proteins along the canonical and non-canonical Wnt pathways. We confirmed that a series of functional proteins along the canonical Wnt pathway, including Axin, p-GSK, and β-catenin proteins, were upregulated in the Hep3BNTR1hi and NTS-treated Hep3Bwt cells but were downregulated in the Hep3BNTR1si cells (Figure (Figure5d).5d). Considering that accumulated β-catenin would translocate to the nucleus, we further analyzed the expression of β-catenin in nuclear lysates. We found a similar increasing pattern of β-catenin in the nucleus of Hep3BNTR1hiand Hep3Bwtcells compared with that in Hep3BNTR1si cells. Nuclear β-catenin protein increased significantly in the NTS-stimulated Hep3BNTR1hi cells (Figure (Figure5d).5d). By contrast, no detectable difference was found in the expression and phosphorylation of the PKC protein, the key regulator along the non-canonical Wnt pathway. These results showed that NTS-induced EMT might be mostly regulated by the activation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

Figure 5
NTS-induced EMT correlated with the activation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway

Inhibition of NTS signaling and Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation reversed the NTS-induced EMT and prevented the tumor invasion of HCC cells

NTR1 antagonist SR48692 and special GSK3β phosphorylation inhibitor TWS119 were used to block the transduction of NTS signaling and the activation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway in NTS-treated Hep3Bwt cells and to validate whether NTS induces tumor EMT by activating the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway. As predicted, SR48692 significantly reversed the EMT of Hep3Bwt cells, which displayed increasing E-cadherin, decreasing N-cadherin, and decreasing β-catenin expressions (Figure (Figure6a).6a). Similarly, TWS119 also reversed the EMT process of Hep3Bwt cells (Figure (Figure6a).6a). Therefore, we studied the key functional proteins downstream the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway and found that both SR48692 and TWS119 dramatically repressed the expression of Wnt3, Axin, p-GSK3β, and β-catenin in Hep3Bwt cells (Figure (Figure6b).6b). TPA was used to activate GSK3β and the downstream signaling pathway in SR48692-treated Hep3Bwt cells to determine whether the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway played pivotal roles on NTS-induced EMT. TPA significantly upregulated the phosphorylation level of GSK3β, increased the expression of β-catenin protein, but decreased the expression of E-cadherin protein (Figure (Figure6c).6c). Dickkopf-1 (DKK-1) was used to block the Wnt signaling to confirm the role of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway in NTS-induced EMT further. The results showed that DKK-1 induced similar effects as SR48692 and TWS119 did, which reversed the NTS-induced EMT via increasing E-cadherin, decreasing N-cadherin, and β-catenin proteins (Figure (Figure6d).6d). N-cadherin expression in NTS-treated Hep3Bwt cells before and after blocking NTR1, GSK3β, and Wnt activities was detected by IF to confirm the suppressing effects of the inhibitors above. We found that N-cadherin was significantly downregulated by SR48692, TWS119, and DKK-1, which was consistent with the observation in the Western blot assay (Figure (Figure6e).6e). However, attenuated EMT process was rescued by TPA after DKK-1blocking, which significantly enhanced the N-cadherin and β-catenin expressions but inhibited the E-cadherin expression (Figure (Figure6d).6d). These results implied that the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway played a vital role in regulating NTS-induced EMT.

Figure 6
Inhibition of NTS signaling and Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation reversed the NTS-induced EMT and prevented the tumor invasion of HCC cells

SR48692, TWS119, and DKK-1 significantly inhibited the migration of NTS-treated Hep3Bwt cells either at 24 or 48 h. The WCR at 24 h and 48 h in SR48692-treated Hep3Bwt cells decreased by nearly two folds compared with that in non-treated Hep3Bwt controls, which declined from 43.70% ± 1.37% to 24.86% ± 2.05% at 24 h and from 65.17% ± 2.97% to 33.50% ± 1.70% at 48 h (P < 0.001; Figure Figure6f).6f). Similarly, the WCR in TWS119-treated and DKK-1-treated Hep3Bwt cells declined to 25.90% ± 2.26% and 19.45% ± 4.04% at 24 h, (P < 0.001; P < 0.001) and to 30.29% ± 1.12% and 32.28% ± 2.51% at 48 h, respectively (P < 0.001; P = 0.001; Figure Figure6f).6f). By contrast, TPA almost completely reversed the SR48692-induced and DKK-1-induced inhibitions on the migration of NTS-treated Hep3Bwt cells both at 24 h and 48 h (Figure (Figure6f).6f). Consistently, SR48692, TWS119, and DKK-1 significantly inhibited tumor invasion, in which the cell counts in the Transwell invasion assay declined from 63.33 ± 1.52/104 cells to 32.67 ± 2.51/104 cells, 28.33 ± 1.21/104 cells, and 29.67 ± 5.03/104 cells, respectively (P < 0.001; Figure Figure6f).6f). However, TPA fully rescued either the SR48692- or DKK-1-mediated inhibition on tumor invasion in NTS-treated Hep3Bwt cells (Figure (Figure6g).6g). These results implied that NTS promoted tumor invasion and migration which could be inhibited either by specifically blocking the transduction of NTS signaling or suppressing the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

Blocking NTS signaling inhibited HCC metastasis rather than tumor growth in vivo

We established HCC xenograft mouse models to investigate the anti-tumor effects of SR48692 in vivo. Hep3Bwt and Hep3BNTR1hi cells were subcutaneously implanted in the right armpit and were termed as Hep3Bwt/con and Hep3BNTR1hi/con, respectively. SR48692 diluted in PBS was administered at 5 mg/kg daily for 14 d to block NTS signaling and termed as Hep3BNTR1hi/SR48692. Tumor volumes and body weights didn't significantly differ among Hep3Bwt/con, Hep3BNTR1hi/con, and Hep3BNTR1hi/SR48692 (Figures (Figures7a7a and and7b).7b). Previous studies have reported that lung metastases can be observed in the orthotopic Hep3B tumor models, especially when Hep3B cells were inoculated by intrahepatic implantation. In our pilot study, we found that xenografts of subcutaneous Hep3BNTR1hi/con models displayed more aggressive potentials than Hep3Bwt/con models and induced more metastases in lungs at day 45 after the implantation (data not shown). But considering that SR48692 was recommended for treatment less than 14 days in mice, we had to observe the tumor growth and metastases patterns of subcutaneous Hep3BNTR1hi/con models and Hep3Bwt/con models for only 2 weeks after the xenografts were detected at day 14. As the literatures reported, characteristic lung metastatic nodules weren't observed in subcutaneous Hep3B models in such a short period of time, but luckily lung micrometastases could be detected under microscopy (Figures (Figures7c).7c). Anti-human β2-MG and Hepatocyte antibodies were used to distinguish minuscule and atypical human liver derived cell mass in mice lungs and dual-positive cell mass was regarded as lung micrometastasis (Figures (Figures7d).7d). We compared the number and size of lung micrometastases among subcutaneous Hep3BNTR1hi/con models, Hep3Bwt/con models and Hep3BNTR1hi/SR48692 models and found that lung micrometastases in Hep3BNTR1hi/con models were comparably larger and composed of considerable β2-MG and Hepatocyte dual-positive staining cells with distinct HCC morphology. The numbers of lung micrometastases in subcutaneous Hep3BNTR1hi/con models significantly higher than those in Hep3Bwt/con models, which was 72.75 ± 11.87 versus 4.18 ± 1.64 (P=0.001; Figures Figures7e).7e). The number of lung micrometastases in Hep3BNTR1hi/SR48692 decreased to 40.67 ± 9.29 after SR48692 treatment was administered (P = 0.012; Figure Figure7e).7e). These results implied that blocking NTS signaling could inhibit HCC metastasis and NTR1 antagonist SR48692 might be a potential anti-metastasis therapy for NTS+NTR1+ HCC.

Figure 7
Blocking NTS signaling inhibited HCC metastasis rather than tumor growth in vivo


Our previous study on the whole genome expression profiling of Asian HCC cancer samples distinguished a subgroup of HCC characterized by the overexpression of NTS and upregulation of EMT-related genes; in particular, NTS expression is positively correlated with the invasion potential of HCC [14]. However, few reports have focused on the expression and functions of NTS in HCC and the correlation between NTS and tumor EMT. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms regulating NTS-induced EMT in HCC remain unclear. Therefore, we intended to identify the expression and distribution of NTS and NTR1 and their relationship with EMT in HCC tissues in the present study. In our study we found that NTS was exclusively expressed in tumor tissues and most of the NTS-positive HCC tissues (73.68%) co-expressed NTR1. Previous experiments have identified that NTS could induce the internalization of NTR1 in target cells by a unique recycling cycle. Activated NTR1 traffics from the plasma membrane to early endosomes, and then recycles [23]. Recent study indicated that NTS-induced NTR1 trafficking from plasma membrane to endosomes could be regulated by microRNAs in colonic epithelial cells, thus partially affected NTS/NTR1 complex-activated pro-inflammatory signaling pathways [24]. Similarly, we also found that NTR1 protein expressed both on the cell membrane and cytoplasma in NTS+NTR1+ HCC samples rather than non-NTS+NTR1+ samples which implied that the expression and location of NTR1 protein in HCC is also mainly regulated by NTS stimulation. The co-expression of NTS and NTR1 in HCC was correlated with aggressive biological behaviors and poor clinical prognosis. Furthermore, the significant upregulation of MMP9 and multiple EMT markers rather than Ki67 protein in NTS+NTR1+ HCC tissues implied that the co-expression of NTS and NTR1 promoted HCC invasion and metastasis by inducing EMT in HCC cells. Using a series of genetically modified HCC cell lines, we demonstrated that the increased NTS signaling either by adding exogenous NTS or increasing the NTR1 expression promoted a series of EMT molecular events in HCC cell lines. A specific inhibitor against NTR1 could reverse the NTS-induced EMT and suppress tumor invasion and metastasis both in vitro and in vivo.

We aimed to explore the molecular mechanism regulating NTS-induced EMT because the NTS signal is a potent trigger of EMT in HCC. PCR array demonstrated that three well-known EMT-related signaling pathways were activated: Wnt, TGF-β, and integrin pathways. We compared the expression levels of all genes in these three pathways among differently NTS-responsible HCC cell lines and found that most differentially expressed genes were concentrated in the Wnt pathway, including CTNNB1, WNT5A, WNT 5B, and WNT11, which remarkably increased by more than twofold after NTS stimulated. Therefore, we focused on the Wnt pathway to elucidate the underlying molecular events regulating NTS-induced EMT. Nineteen known Wnts are present in the mammalian system and are generally divided into two categories, namely, canonical Wnts, including Wnt1, Wnt3A, Wnt8A, and Wnt8B, which activate downstream signaling proteins through the canonical pathway involving β-catenin and non-canonical Wnts, including Wnt4, Wnt5A, and Wnt11 [25]. In the canonical Wnt pathway, the degradation complex consists of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), Axin, and GSK3β, which induce the phosphorylation of β-catenin and its ubiquitin-dependent degradation in the proteasome. Wnt signals cause the recruitment of dishevelled protein to block GSK3β-mediated phosphorylation of β-catenin and prevent the constitutive destruction of cytosolic β-catenin. In this case, β-catenin accumulates and transports to the nucleus, where it subsequently induces a cellular response by forming a complex with Lefs/TcFs [26]. β-catenin is a proliferation-related transcription factor. However, its effects on tumor invasion and EMT have been gradually recognized [27]. E-cadherin repressor Snail or Slug is also activated by β-catenin–Lefs/Tcfs-mediated transcription [28, 29]. Research on colorectal cancer has demonstrated that β-catenin subsequently increases the expression of EMT-related transcription factors Twist and Snail, along with the upregulation of mesenchymal marker Vimentin and the downregulation of epithelial marker ZO-1 [30]. Non-canonical Wnt pathways, including the planar cell polarity and steroid receptor binding pathways, have been explored. Several studies have shown that the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway is associated with cancer cell EMT [3133], and PKC is a key functional protein regulating the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway [34, 35]. Although an increase in Wnt5 expression was observed through PCR array and Western blot, the non-canonical Wnt/Ca2+ pathway was not considered as the vital signaling pathway regulating the NTS-mediated EMT in HCC because no detectable evidences of the PKC protein activation were observed after NTS stimulation was induced or NTR1 expression was increased. By contrast, most of the functional signaling proteins downstream the canonical Wnt pathway were upregulated after NTS stimulation was added or NTR1 expression was enhanced, including Axin, p-GSK, and β-catenin, either by PCR array or Western blot. Blocking experiments indicated that the NTR1 antagonist SR48692, Wnt inhibitor DKK-1, and GSK-3β inhibitor TWS119 could block the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway and inhibit NTS-induced EMT with a similar efficiency. Furthermore, the repressive effects of SR48692 on NTS-induced EMT and tumor invasion were rescued by specific GSK-3β antagonist TPA in HCC cells. SR48692 inhibited the lung metastases of NTR1-overexpressing HCC xenografts in vivo in tumor-bearing mouse models. Thus, we proposed that the NTS+NTR1+ induced EMT by activating the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

We presented a diagram (Figure (Figure8)8) to display the speculated signaling network downstream NTR1 and the interaction among a series of molecules after NTS interacted with NTR1, which may elucidate how NTS signaling induced the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and thus promoted tumor EMT in HCC. The diagram could clearly demonstrate our hypothesis of the “NTS/NTR1-Wnt-EMT”axis in HCC, which included a series of complex molecular events during NTS-induced EMT of HCC cells and tumor invasion in vitro and in vivo. Studies on colorectal carcinoma have indicated some key NTR1 downstream signaling pathways regulating Wnt expression [36]. The interaction of NTS and NTR1 induces the activation of Ras-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) downstream cascades and the NF-κB pathway [37]. The p38 MAPK is necessary to the Wnt3-induced accumulation of β-catenin and Lef/Tcf-sensitive gene activation, and the specific inhibition of p38 MAPK restores the Wnt3a-attenuated GSK3β kinase activity [38]. Wnt5a transcription is regulated by NF-κB; in this process, a conserved NF-κB-binding site within the Wnt5a promoter participates in the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) and the Toll-like receptor (TLR) induces Wnt5a upregulation in inflammation [39]. However, further studies are needed to elucidate whether other signaling pathways are involved in the NTS-induced Wnt expression, which might provide new insights into the screening of novel anti-cancer targets in HCC.

Figure 8
A hypothesis of the “NTS/NTR1-Wnt-EMT” axis was proposed to describe NTS/NTR1-induced EMT in HCC cells

This study is the first to demonstrate that the co-expression of NTS and NTR1 in HCC is correlated with tumor invasion and poor prognosis. Thus, their co-expression can be regarded as a predictive biomarker of aggressive phenotype and an independent prognostic factor of poor clinical outcome in HCC. We also elucidated the relationship between the NTS signaling and tumor EMT at cellular and tissue levels. We further demonstrated that blocking the NTS signaling by disrupting the interaction between NTS and NTR1 could significantly inhibit EMT and tumor invasion in vitro and in vivo. We also identified that the dysfunctional activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway regulating the NTS-induced EMT and tumor invasion in HCC which could be suppressed significantly both in vitro and in vivo through target therapy against NTS signaling, such as the specific antagonist against NTR1 SR48692. SR48692 has elicited potent anti-tumor efficiency in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer and small cell lung cancer since the early 2000s by inhibiting NTS-induced tumor proliferation [40]. Studies on prostate carcinoma have also validated the clinical safety and anti-tumor effects of SR48692 [41]. In our study, SR48692 could significantly inhibit the metastases of NTR1-overexpressing HCC xenografts in the lungs in vivo. Therefore, we proposed a hypothesis that the “NTS/NTR1-Wnt-EMT” axis existed and promoted tumor invasion of HCC cells. This hypothesis may represent an underlying pro-metastatic molecular mechanism inducing early relapse after surgery and poor clinical outcome in HCC patients. Furthermore, target therapy against NTS signaling may be a new promising anticancer therapeutic strategy to prevent tumor metastasis and to improve the clinical prognosis of HCC patients.


Patient information

This study recruited 100 cases of HCC patients treated with partial liver resection surgery at the Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology of the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from November 2007 to November 2009. These patients included 93 males and 7 females with a median age of 54.5 years. The patients were pathologically diagnosed with HCC at histological grade I (n = 25), grade II (n = 54), and grade III (n = 21), and classified as stage I (n = 26), stage II (n = 36), and stage III (n =38; Table Table1).1). No prior treatments, including chemotherapy or radiotherapy, were conducted before liver resection surgery was performed. Postoperative follow-up time was 40–65 months. This project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University. All experiments were performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written consents were obtained from the patients.

Cell lines and cell culture

Human HCC cell lines 7721, MHCC97L, Hep3B, and HepG2, normal liver cell line L02, and human embryonic kidney cell line 293T were obtained from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Lentivirus pLVX-IRES-Puro plasmids and packaging plasmids (pSPAX2 and pMD2G) were purchased from Clontech (Mountain View, CA, USA). Eshcerichia coli Dh5α competent cells were purchased from Invitrogen (Grand Island, NY, USA). The cell lines were maintained in 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)/Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) in a humidified chamber with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. NTS (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, NY, USA) was dissolved in PBS as a 1 mg/ml stock and stored at −80 °C. SR48692 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was also dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a 2 mM stock and stored at −80 °C. TWS119 (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and TPA (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) were dissolved in DMSO as a 1 mM stock and stored at −80 °C. DKK-1 (Peprotech, Offenbach, USA) was dissolved in PBS as a 10 μg/ml stock and stored at −80 °C. HCC cells were incubated with 1 μg/ml NTS, 10 nM SR48692, 5 nM TWS119, 200 nM TPA, and 200ng/ml DKK-1 at 37 °C for 24 h.

Construction of genetically modified HCC cell lines

Total cell RNA was isolated from HepG2 cells by using a thiocyanate reagent (Trizol; Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA). RNA (2 μg) was reverse-transcribed with Moloney murine leukemia virus-reverse transcriptase (M-MLV; Takara, Tokyo, Japan) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. RT mix was then used to amplify the full-length cDNA of human NTR1 through PCR by using Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Tokyo, Japan) under the following conditions: 95 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 58 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min; and 72 °C for 10 min. The forward primer containing an EcoRI site was 5′-TgaattcATGCGCCTCAACAGCTCCGCGCCGG-3′, and the reverse primer containing a Xbal site was 5′-TATAtctagaCTAGTACAGCGTCTC-3′. Both the 1256 bp NTR1 fragment and the puromycin-resistant retroviral vector pLVX-IRES-Puro were digested with EcoRI and Xbal (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). The NTR1 fragment was ligated into the digested pLVX-IRES-Puro by using T4 DNA ligase (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan), and the identity of the recombinant plasmids was confirmed through DNA sequencing. The constructed vector was named pLVX-IRES-Puro-NTR1. The pLVX-IRES-Puro-NTR1, pSPAX2, and pMD2G were mixed at 1:1:1, which was used to transfect 293T mixtures with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Supernatants were collected 48 h after transfection and filtered through 0.45 μm disc filters, which were either used immediately or stored at −80 °C. Hep3B cells were seeded in 6-well cell culture clusters and incubated with the medium containing 1 volume of filtered virus-containing supernatant and 9 volumes of fresh growth media (MOI = 30) for 24 h in the presence of 8 μg/ml Polybrene (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). After 48 h, the infected cells were incubated in the media containing 10% FBS and 2 μg/ml of puromycin. The selected positive cells were pooled, named Hep3BNTR1hi, and used for further experiments.

Hep3B and HepG2 cells seeded in 6-well cell culture clusters were transfected with siRNA smart pool targeting the mRNA of human NTR1 by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA). The medium was discarded, and 500 μl of transfection mixture containing 5 μl of Lipofectamine 2000 and 10 μl of 20 μM NTR1 siRNA (GenePharma, Shanghai, China) in Opti-MEM were added to obtain a final concentration of 100 nM siRNA. Control cells were transfected with the same amount of non-targeting siRNA. Transfected cells were cultured for 72 h and harvested for RT-PCR validation. The transfected cells were named Hep3BNTR1sior HepG2NTR1si.


All of the 100 cases of paraffin-embedded HCC samples were collected from the Department of Pathology of the Tianjin Cancer Institute and Hospital. The samples were heated for 1 h at 60 °C, deparaffinized in xylene, and rehydrated with graded alcohol. Antigens were retrieved by heating the samples in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 2 min. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched in a methanol and hydrogen peroxide bath for 20 min. All of the samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with mouse anti-human NTS, NTR1, Ki67, MMP9, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, β-catenin, and Vimentin monoclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotech, Dallas, TX, USA) at dilution of 1:500, and a biotinylated secondary antibody goat anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotech, Dallas, TX, USA) labeled with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) by using a DAB staining kit (Maixin Biotechnology, Fuzhou, China). For the negative control, the primary antibody was substituted with mouse isotype IgG1. Positive cells were stained brownish yellow in the cytoplasm or in the cell membrane. Images were obtained by using an Olympus BX51 microscope. Five representative high-power fields (400× magnification) were selected for each tissue section for histological evaluation. For each protein, two parameters, namely, positive rate (PR) and staining intensity (SI), were used to describe the expression on the basis of the extensity and intensity of the positively stained cells in the samples. PR denotes the percentage of positively stained cells in cancer tissues: ≤10%, negative (scored as 0); 11%–30%, positive at low frequency (scored as 1); 31%–60%, positive at medium frequency (scored as 2); and ≥60%, positive at high frequency (scored as 3). SI refers to the ranked staining intensity of positively stained cells in HCC samples. This value ranged from 0 to 3, which corresponded to negative, weakly positive, moderately positive, and strongly positive. The sum represented the final scores of each protein marker in the HCC samples because protein expression was comprehensively evaluated on the basis of both parameters. A final score of <4 was defined as low/negative expression and a final score of ≥4 was defined as high expression.

Cell proliferation assay

The proliferation of Hep3Bwt, Hep3BNTR1hi, Hep3BNTR1si, HepG2wt, and HepG2NTR1si cells was compared through BrdU cell proliferation assay (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, the control and transfected cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well in 24-well cell culture clusters and cultured for 48 h. BrdU dilution (10ng/ml) was added to the culture media 12 h before the proliferation assay was completed. The HCC cells were harvested, resuspended in 200 μl of washing buffer, and incubated with FITC-labeled anti-BrdU antibody. Incorporation was detected through flow cytometry to measure the percentage of BrdU-positive cells.

Cell apoptosis assay

The apoptotic ratios of cells were determined using an Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). After 12 h of starvation treatment, the cells were collected and washed twice with cold PBS buffer, resuspended in 100 μl of binding buffer, incubated with 5 μl of FITC-labeled Annexin V and 10 μl of PI for 15 min at room temperature, and analyzed through flow cytometry. The DMSO-treated cells were used as negative control.

Scratch wound healing assay

The cells were cultured in a serum-free medium for 12 h to confluency, and scratched with a sterile pipette tip. The cells were washed twice with PBS to remove cell debris. The culture medium was replaced with a growth medium containing 5% FBS for 48 h. Wound areas were photographed and analyzed using IPP 6.0 at 100× magnification. Each wound was evaluated six times, and the average was obtained. Independent duplicates were examined in the same manner. Wound closure rate (WCR) was measured photogrammetrically at 24 and 48 h in accordance with the following equation: WCR = {1 − [(wound area)/(original wound area)]}.

Invasion assay

Invasion assay was performed with 24-Transwell chambers (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). In brief, 1 × 104 cells were harvested and resuspended in 200 μl of DMEM without serum and then plated in the top chamber. The lower chamber of the Transwell was filled with 500 μl of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. A cell suspension was applied onto the Matrigel membrane and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The cells were passed through the Matrigel, and the filtered cells were fixed with 70% methanol, stained with 0.2% crystal violet, washed with PBS, and counted under a microscope.

Real-time PCR Analysis

Total RNA was isolated through Trizol extraction in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and reverse-transcribed with M-MLV (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). cDNA was amplified using SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ (Takara, Tokyo, Japan) in a 7500 RT-PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Comparative RT-PCR was performed in triplicate, and the relative gene expression was calculated by employing the ΔΔ cross threshold (Ct) method. The following primers were used: NTS: FP, 5′-GAACAGCCCAGCTGAGGAAA-3′; RP, 5′-TCCTGGATTAACTCCCAGTGT-3′;E-cadherin:FP, 5′- TGAAGGTGACAGAGCCTCTGGAT-3′;RP, 5′-TGGG TGAATTCGGGCTTGTT-3′;β-catinin: FP, 5′-TGGTG ACAGGGAAGACATCA-3′; RP, 5′-CCATAGTGAAGG CGAACTGC-3′;N-cadherin:FP, 5′-ACAGTGGCCACC TACAAAGG-3′; RP, 5′-CCGAGATGGGGTTGATAA TG-3′; Snail: FP, 5′-AGCCTGGGTGCCCTCAAGAT-3′; RP, 5′-AGGTTGGAGCGGTCAGCGAA-3′; and Slug: FP, 5′-TGCCTGTCATACCACAACCAGA-3′; RP, 5′-GG AGGAGGTGTCAGATGGAGGA-3′.

Western blot analysis

The cells were harvested and washed twice with PBS (pH 7.4, 0.15 M). Total protein was extracted by RIPA buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Approximately 30 μg of total protein was subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in TBST and incubated with the primary antibody (1:1000) in TBST containing 5% BSA overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were washed twice with TBST and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:4000; Santa Cruz Biotech, USA) at room temperature for 2 h. The membrane was exposed using an enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Chemicon International, USA). The membranes were then reprobed with anti-β-actin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotech, Dallas, TX, USA) in 1:2000 dilutions to confirm equal protein loading.


The cells were plated in 12-well glass chamber slides, and cell growth was arrested after 24 h. In brief, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldyhyde and blocked. The slides were treated with 0.05% Triton and then incubated with rabbit anti-N-cadherin (1:100) antibody overnight at 4 °C. N-cadherin staining was completed with FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG1 (1:400) at RT in the dark for 1 h and then detected under a fluorescence microscope.

PCR array

Differentially expressed genes were compared before and after NTS stimulation by using a human EMT RT2 profiler PCR array kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). PCR was performed on a 7500 RT-PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. For data analysis, ΔΔ Ct method was performed and analyzed using specific algorithms provided by the manufacturer. Fold-changes were then calculated using QiaGen (

Animal model

Hep3B cells were used to establish an orthotopic murine HCC model and to examine the anti-tumor efficiency of different drugs and treatments, such as gemcitabine, sorafenib, and microsecond pulsed electric fields. Hep3B xenograft models have also been developed to investigate HCC metastasis in vivo [42, 43]. NOD-SCID BALB/c mice were inoculated subcutaneously in the right armpit with 2 × 106 Hep3Bwt or Hep3BNTR1hi cells; the growth of the primary tumors and the number of lung metastases were compared. SR48692, which is the specific antagonist of NTR1, was dissolved and stocked with DMSO at a concentration of 2 mM. SR48692 was diluted in PBS and inoculated (100 μl) i.p. at a concentration of 5 mg/kg in mice daily for 14 days to block NTS signaling in vivo. The control mice were treated with blank PBS containing 10% (v/v) DMSO. Tumor growth was evaluated through caliper measurements, and tumor volume was calculated in accordance with the following ellipsoid formula: volume = tumor length ×width2 × 0.5. The mice were weighed weekly after tumor was implanted. The mice were sacrificed 4 weeks after the tumor was implanted. Their lungs were resected and embedded in paraffin, and the micrometstases in their lungs were counted under a microscope. In order to define the lung micrometstases were of human live origin, two anti-human β2-MG(Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and Hepatocyte (Zhong Shan-Golden Bridge, Beijing, China) antibodies were used to distinguish minuscule and atypical cell mass in mice lungs. Two experienced pathologists reviewed all IHC slides of lung samples and evaluated the numbers and sizes of lung micrometastases. The experiment was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments of the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital and Institute and was performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0. Measurement data were presented as median (interquartile range) and compared through χ2 test. Quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared through ANOVA and LSD tests. Spearman's rank order test and linear regression analysis were performed to assess the correlations between protein levels. Cumulative survival was determined via Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate survival analysis between the different protein markers and the overall survival of HCC patients was conducted through log-rank test. Multivariate survival analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Independent prognostic factors were screened using a forward stepwise procedure. Statistical significance was set at P <0.05.




The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.


This study was supported by National Key Scientific and Technological Project of China (No. 2015BAI12B12), National Key Scientific and Technological Project of China (No. 2015BAI12B15), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81272360), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81472473), and Scientific and Technological Project of Tianjin, China (No.13ZCZCSY20300).


1. El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1118–1127. [PubMed]
2. Duan R, Han L, Wang Q, Wei J, Chen L, Zhang J, Kang C, Wang L. HOXA13 is a potential GBM diagnostic marker and promotes glioma invasion by activating the Wnt and TGF-beta pathways. Oncotarget. 2015;6:27778–27793. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4813. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Grunert S, Jechlinger M, Beug H. Diverse cellular and molecular mechanisms contribute to epithelial plasticity and metastasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:657–665. [PubMed]
4. Van Meeteren LA, Ten Dijke P. Regulation of endothelial cell plasticity by TGF-beta. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;347:177–186. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Yook JI, Li XY, Ota I, Fearon ER, Weiss SJ. Wnt-dependent regulation of the E-cadherin repressor snail. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:11740–11748. [PubMed]
6. Conteduca V, Aieta M, Amadori D, De Giorgi U. Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer: current and emerging therapy strategies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;92:11–24. [PubMed]
7. Carraway R, Leeman SE. The isolation of a new hypotensive peptide, neurotensin, from bovine hypothalami. J Biol Chem. 1973;248:6854–6861. [PubMed]
8. Armstrong MJ, Parker MC, Ferris CF, Leeman SE. Neurotensin stimulates [3H]oleic acid translocation across rat small intestine. Am J Physiol. 1986;251:G823–829. [PubMed]
9. Baca I, Feurle GE, Schwab A, Mittmann U, Knauf W, Lehnert T. Effect of neurotensin on exocrine pancreatic secretion in dogs. Digestion. 1982;23:174–183. [PubMed]
10. Cross AS, Azzopardi JG, Krausz T, Van Noorden S, Polak JM. A morphological and immunocytochemical study of a distinctive variant of ductal carcinoma in-situ of the breast. Histopathology. 1985;9:21–37. [PubMed]
11. Alifano M, Souaze F, Dupouy S, Camilleri-Broet S, Younes M, Ahmed-Zaid SM, Takahashi T, Cancellieri A, Damiani S, Boaron M, Broet P, Miller LD, Gespach C, et al. Neurotensin receptor 1 determines the outcome of non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:4401–4410. [PubMed]
12. Kim JT, Li J, Song J, Lee EY, Weiss HL, Townsend CM, Jr, Evers BM. Differential expression and tumorigenic function of neurotensin receptor 1 in neuroendocrine tumor cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6:26960–26970. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4745. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Souaze F, Dupouy S, Viardot-Foucault V, Bruyneel E, Attoub S, Gespach C, Gompel A, Forgez P. Expression of neurotensin and NT1 receptor in human breast cancer: a potential role in tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2006;66:6243–6249. [PubMed]
14. Yu J, Ren X, Chen Y, Liu P, Wei X, Li H, Ying G, Chen K, Winkler H, Hao X. Dysfunctional activation of neurotensin/IL-8 pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with increased inflammatory response in microenvironment, more epithelial mesenchymal transition in cancer and worse prognosis in patients. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56069. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Pelaprat D. Interactions between neurotensin receptors and G proteins. Peptides. 2006;27:2476–2487. [PubMed]
16. Maoret JJ, Anini Y, Rouyer-Fessard C, Gully D, Laburthe M. Neurotensin and a non-peptide neurotensin receptor antagonist control human colon cancer cell growth in cell culture and in cells xenografted into nude mice. Int J Cancer. 1999;80:448–454. [PubMed]
17. Moody TW, Chan DC, Mantey SA, Moreno P, Jensen RT. SR48692 inhibits non-small cell lung cancer proliferation in an EGF receptor-dependent manner. Life Sci. 2014;100:25–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Wang JG, Li NN, Li HN, Cui L, Wang P. Pancreatic cancer bears overexpression of neurotensin and neurotensin receptor subtype-1 and SR 48692 counteracts neurotensin induced cell proliferation in human pancreatic ductal carcinoma cell line PANC-1. Neuropeptides. 2011;45:151–156. [PubMed]
19. Somai S, Gompel A, Rostene W, Forgez P. Neurotensin counteracts apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;295:482–488. [PubMed]
20. Akter H, Park M, Kwon OS, Song EJ, Park WS, Kang MJ. Activation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) by neurotensin promotes cell invasion and migration through ERK pathway in gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:6053–6062. [PubMed]
21. Hashimoto K, Kyoda Y, Tanaka T, Maeda T, Kobayashi K, Uchida K, Kitamura H, Hirata K, Tsukamoto T, Masumori N. The potential of neurotensin secreted from neuroendocrine tumor cells to promote gelsolin-mediated invasiveness of prostate adenocarcinoma cells. Lab Invest. 2015;95:283–295. [PubMed]
22. Reubi JC, Waser B, Schaer JC, Laissue JA. Neurotensin receptors in human neoplasms: high incidence in Ewing's sarcomas. Int J Cancer. 1999;82:213–218. [PubMed]
23. Law IK, Murphy JE, Bakirtzi K, Bunnett NW, Pothoulakis C. Neurotensin-induced proinflammatory signaling in human colonocytes is regulated by beta-arrestins and endothelin-converting enzyme-1-dependent endocytosis and resensitization of neurotensin receptor 1. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:15066–15075. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Law IK, Jensen D, Bunnett NW, Pothoulakis C. Neurotensin-induced miR-133alpha expression regulates neurotensin receptor 1 recycling through its downstream target aftiphilin. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22195. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Widelitz R. Wnt signaling through canonical and non-canonical pathways: recent progress. Growth Factors. 2005;23:111–116. [PubMed]
26. Yang W, Yan HX, Chen L, Liu Q, He YQ, Yu LX, Zhang SH, Huang DD, Tang L, Kong XN, Chen C, Liu SQ, Wu MC, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling contributes to activation of normal and tumorigenic liver progenitor cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4287–4295. [PubMed]
27. Yuan Z, Yu X, Ni B, Chen D, Yang Z, Huang J, Wang J, Wang L. Overexpression of long non-coding RNA-CTD903 inhibits colorectal cancer invasion and migration by repressing Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and predicts favorable prognosis. Int J Oncol. 2016;48:2675–2685. [PubMed]
28. Baldwin LA, Hoff JT, Lefringhouse J, Zhang M, Jia C, Liu Z, Erfani S, Jin H, Xu M, She QB, Van Nagell JR, Wang C, Chen L, et al. CD151-alpha3beta1 integrin complexes suppress ovarian tumor growth by repressing slug-mediated EMT and canonical Wnt signaling. Oncotarget. 2014;5:12203–12217. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2622. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Zou W, Zou Y, Zhao Z, Li B, Ran P. Nicotine-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition via Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in human airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2013;304:L199–209. [PubMed]
30. Yuan Z, Yu X, Ni B, Chen D, Yang Z, Huang J, Wang J, Wang L. Overexpression of long non-coding RNA-CTD903 inhibits colorectal cancer invasion and migration by repressing Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and predicts favorable prognosis. Int J Oncol. 2016 [PubMed]
31. Ford CE, Punnia-Moorthy G, Henry CE, Llamosas E, Nixdorf S, Olivier J, Caduff R, Ward RL, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V. The non-canonical Wnt ligand, Wnt5a, is upregulated and associated with epithelial to mesenchymal transition in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:338–345. [PubMed]
32. Qi H, Sun B, Zhao X, Du J, Gu Q, Liu Y, Cheng R, Dong X. Wnt5a promotes vasculogenic mimicry and epithelial-mesenchymal transition via protein kinase Calpha in epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep. 2014;32:771–779. [PubMed]
33. Qin L, Yin YT, Zheng FJ, Peng LX, Yang CF, Bao YN, Liang YY, Li XJ, Xiang YQ, Sun R, Li AH, Zou RH, Pei XQ, et al. WNT5A promotes stemness characteristics in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells leading to metastasis and tumorigenesis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:10239–10252. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3518. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Dissanayake SK, Wade M, Johnson CE, O'connell MP, Leotlela PD, French AD, Shah KV, Hewitt KJ, Rosenthal DT, Indig FE, Jiang Y, Nickoloff BJ, Taub DD, et al. The Wnt5A/protein kinase C pathway mediates motility in melanoma cells via the inhibition of metastasis suppressors and initiation of an epithelial to mesenchymal transition. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:17259–17271. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Weeraratna AT, Jiang Y, Hostetter G, Rosenblatt K, Duray P, Bittner M, Trent JM. Wnt5a signaling directly affects cell motility and invasion of metastatic melanoma. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:279–288. [PubMed]
36. Zhao D, Keates AC, Kuhnt-Moore S, Moyer MP, Kelly CP, Pothoulakis C. Signal transduction pathways mediating neurotensin-stimulated interleukin-8 expression in human colonocytes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:44464–44471. [PubMed]
37. Zhao D, Zhan Y, Zeng H, Koon HW, Moyer MP, Pothoulakis C. Neurotensin stimulates interleukin-8 expression through modulation of I kappa B alpha phosphorylation and p65 transcriptional activity: involvement of protein kinase C alpha. Molecular Pharmacology. 2005;67:2025–2031. [PubMed]
38. Bikkavilli RK, Feigin ME, Malbon CC. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase regulates canonical Wnt-beta-catenin signaling by inactivation of GSK3beta. Journal of Cell Science. 2008;121:3598–3607. [PubMed]
39. Borday C, Cabochette P, Parain K, Mazurier N, Janssens S, Tran HT, Sekkali B, Bronchain O, Vleminckx K, Locker M, Perron M. Antagonistic cross-regulation between Wnt and Hedgehog signalling pathways controls post-embryonic retinal proliferation. Development. 2012;139:3499–3509. [PubMed]
40. Valerie NC, Casarez EV, Dasilva JO, Dunlap-Brown ME, Parsons SJ, Amorino GP, Dziegielewski J. Inhibition of neurotensin receptor 1 selectively sensitizes prostate cancer to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. 2011;71:6817–6826. [PubMed]
41. Wang X, Jackson LN, Johnson SM, Wang Q, Evers BM. Suppression of neurotensin receptor type 1 expression and function by histone deacetylase inhibitors in human colorectal cancers. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9:2389–2398. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Park SY, Lee YK, Lee WS, Park OJ, Kim YM. The involvement of AMPK/GSK3-beta signals in the control of metastasis and proliferation in hepato-carcinoma cells treated with anthocyanins extracted from Korea wild berry Meoru. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:109. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Xue X, Zhang Y, Zhi Q, Tu M, Xu Y, Sun J, Wei J, Lu Z, Miao Y, Gao W. MiR200-upregulated Vasohibin 2 promotes the malignant transformation of tumors by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Commun Signal. 2014;12:62. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC