|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
The carbazole alkaloid murrayafoline A (MuA) enhances contractility and the Ca2+ currents carried by the Cav1.2 channels [ICa1.2] of rat cardiomyocytes. As only few drugs stimulate ICa1.2, this study was designed to analyse the effects of MuA on vascular Cav1.2 channels.
Vascular activity was assessed on rat aorta rings mounted in organ baths. Cav1.2 Ba2+ current [IBa1.2] was recorded in single rat aorta and tail artery myocytes by the patch‐clamp technique. Docking at a 3D model of the rat, α1c central pore subunit of the Cav1.2 channel was simulated in silico.
In rat aorta rings MuA, at concentrations ≤14.2 μM, increased 30 mM K+‐induced tone and shifted the concentration‐response curve to K+ to the left. Conversely, at concentrations >14.2 μM, it relaxed high K+ depolarized rings and antagonized Bay K 8644‐induced contraction. In single myocytes, MuA stimulated IBa1.2 in a concentration‐dependent, bell‐shaped manner; stimulation was stable, incompletely reversible upon drug washout and accompanied by a leftward shift of the voltage‐dependent activation curve. MuA docked at the α1C subunit central pore differently from nifedipine and Bay K 8644, although apparently interacting with the same amino acids of the pocket. Neither Bay K 8644‐induced stimulation nor nifedipine‐induced block of IBa1.2 was modified by MuA.
Murrayafoline A is a naturally occurring vasoactive agent able to modulate Cav1.2 channels and dock at the α1C subunit central pore in a manner that differed from that of dihydropyridines. © 2015 The British Pharmacological Society
These Tables list key protein targets and ligands in this article which are hyperlinked to corresponding entries in http://www.guidetopharmacology.org, the common portal for data from the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY (Pawson et al., 2014) and are permanently archived in the Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14 (Alexander et al., 2013).
Murrayafoline A (1‐methoxy‐3‐methyl‐9H‐carbazole; MuA; Figure 1) was isolated for the first time from Murraya euchrestifolia Hayata (Rutaceae) collected in Taiwan and identified as a carbazole alkaloid by Furukawa et al. (1985). Thereafter, MuA was isolated from the root of several species of the genus Murraya (Itoigawa et al., 2000), Glycosmis (Glycosmis pentaphylla (Retz.) DC. and Glycosmis stenocarpa (Drake) Guilt.; Bhattacharyya and Chowdhury, 1985; Cuong et al., 2004) and Clausena (Clausena dunniana Levl.; Cui et al., 2002). MuA exhibits strong fungicidal activity against Cladosporium cucumerinum and possesses growth inhibitory activity on human fibrosarcoma HT‐1080 cells as well as cell cycle M‐phase inhibitory and apoptosis‐inducing activity on mouse tsFT210 cells (Cui et al., 2002). Furthermore, this compound provided the first example of a carbazole alkaloid able to suppress growth of the human leukemia HL‐60 cell line by inducing apoptosis through the activation of the caspase‐9/caspase‐3 pathway (Ito et al., 2012). MuA attenuated the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway by promoting the degradation of intracellular β‐catenin proteins (Choi et al., 2010). Because molecular lesions in Wnt/β‐catenin signalling and subsequent up‐regulation of β‐catenin response transcription occur frequently during the development of colon cancer, MuA has been proposed as a potential chemotherapeutic agent in this type of cancer.
In addition to being an interesting and promising drug per se, MuA represents also a useful scaffold for the design and development of novel drugs. In fact, recent results indicate that MuA derivatives containing a 1,2,3‐triazole nucleus inhibit the LPS‐stimulated production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines (IL‐6, IL‐12 p40 and TNF‐α) in bone marrow‐derived dendritic cells, thus representing potential anti‐inflammatory drugs (Thuy et al., 2013). Finally, this carbazole alkaloid can be totally synthesized either from 5‐methyl‐2‐nitrophenol, through a four‐step process using the organic palladium catalysts Pd(OAc)2, Pd2(dba)3 and Dave‐phos (Toan et al., 2013), or directly from 1,2,3,4‐tetrahydrocarbazol‐1‐one (Chakraborty et al., 2013).
MuA has been recently shown to enhance contractility and increase Ca2+ influx in single rat ventricular myocytes (Son et al., 2014), behaving like a stimulator of Cav1.2 channels. Therefore, in view of its possible therapeutic use, it would be interesting to know its effects on vascular function. To this end, an in‐depth analysis of MuA effects on rat vascular Cav1.2 channel was performed in vitro both on intact vessels and single myocytes and in silico on α1c subunit pore model of the channel. MuA was shown to exert a bimodal effect on both aorta ring contractility and ICa1.2 and docked at the α1C subunit central pore in a different way from that of the dihydropyridines.
All animal care and experimental protocols conformed to the European Union Guidelines for the Care and the Use of Laboratory Animals (European Union Directive 2010/63/EU) and were approved by the Italian Department of Health (666/2015‐PR). All studies involving animals are reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals (Kilkenny et al., 2010; McGrath et al., 2010). A total of 74 animals were used in the experiments described here. Aorta rings (2 mm wide) were prepared from male Wistar rats (300–400 g; Charles River Italia, Calco, Italy), anaesthetized (i.p.) with a mixture of Ketavet® (30 mg·kg−1 ketamine; Intervet, Aprilia, Italy) and Xilor® (8 mg·kg−1 xylazine; Bio 98, San Lazzaro, Italy), decapitated and exsanguinated. The endothelium was removed by gently rubbing the lumen of the ring with the curved tips of a forceps. Contractile isometric tension was recorded as described elsewhere (Cuong et al., 2014). Control preparations were challenged with the drug vehicle only.
The effects of MuA and Bay K 8644 on the contraction induced by high K+ concentrations were assessed to determine the involvement of Cav1.2 channels in their vascular activity. Steady tension was evoked in rings by either 30 mM or 60 mM K+; thereafter, the drug under investigation was added cumulatively. At the end of each experiment, 10 μM nifedipine followed by 100 μM sodium nitroprusside were added to test muscle functional integrity. Muscle tension was evaluated as a percentage of the initial response to K+, taken as 100%.
To study MuA‐induced sensitization to K+, a cumulative concentration‐response curve to K+ was constructed in rings preincubated for 15 min with vehicle or drug. Responses were evaluated as percentage of the contraction induced by 0.3 μM phenylephrine in modified Krebs–Henseleit saline solution (PSS; see below for composition), taken as 100%.
Any potential interaction between MuA and Bay K 8644 at the Cav1.2 channel was assessed on depolarized rings. Rings were stimulated with 60 mM K+ for 15 min and then washed for 90 min with a Ca2+‐free PSS containing 1 mM EGTA. The preparations were then challenged with 0.3 μM phenylephrine to deplete the intracellular Ca2+ stores. The spasmogenic response to 3 mM Ca2+ was assessed on rings depolarized with Ca2+‐free 60 mM K+ PSS and preincubated for 30 min with the drug or vehicle. At the plateau of the Ca2+‐induced contraction, 10 nM Bay K 8644 followed by 100 μM sodium nitroprusside were added to test Cav1.2 channels as well as smooth muscle functional integrity. The response was evaluated as a percentage of the initial response to 60 mM K+, taken as 100%.
Smooth muscle cells were freshly isolated from either the aorta, according to Zhao et al. (2001), or the main tail artery (Mugnai et al., 2014). Briefly, a 3 mm long thoracic section of aorta was incubated at 37°C in 2 mL of Ca2+‐free external solution (see below) containing 20 mM taurine (prepared by replacing NaCl with equimolar taurine), 1 mg·mL−1 bovine serum albumin, 0.75 mg·mL−1 papain and 1 mg·mL−1 DL‐dithiothreitol, and gently bubbled with a 95% O2–5% CO2 gas mixture for 20–30 min. After removing the adventitia, the aorta was cut into small pieces and transferred into a Ca2+‐free external solution containing 20 mM taurine, 1 mg·mL−1 collagenase (type XI) and 1 mg·mL−1 hyaluronidase for 10 min at 37°C. Single cells were released by gentle trituration of minced, proteolysed tissue, through a Pasteur pipette, stored at 4°C in the Ca2+‐free external solution containing 20 mM taurine and used on the same day of the preparation.
Smooth muscle cells were freshly isolated from a 5 mm long piece of main tail artery incubated at 37°C in 2 mL of 20 mM taurine and 0.1 mM Ca2+ external solution containing 1 mg·mL−1 collagenase (type XI), 1 mg·mL−1 soybean trypsin inhibitor and 1 mg·mL−1 BSA, gently bubbled with a 95% O2–5% CO2 gas mixture, as previously described (Fusi et al., 2001). Cells, stored in 0.05 mM Ca2+ external solution containing 20 mM taurine and 0.5 mg·mL−1 BSA at 4°C under normal atmosphere, were used for experiments within 2 days after isolation (Mugnai et al., 2014).
Cells were continuously superfused with external solution containing 0.1 mM Ca2+ and 30 mM tetraethylammonium using a peristaltic pump (LKB 2132, Bromma, Sweden), at a flow rate of 400 μL·min−1. The conventional whole‐cell patch‐clamp method (Hamill et al., 1981) was employed to voltage‐clamp smooth muscle cells, as previously described (Cuong et al., 2014; see also Supporting Information). Electrophysiological responses were assessed at room temperature (20–22°C).
The current carried by the Cav1.2 channels, IBa1.2 or ICa1.2, was always recorded in external solution containing 30 mM tetraethylammonium and 5 mM Ca2+ or Ba2+ (tail artery) or 10 mM Ba2+ (aorta). Current was elicited with 250 ms clamp pulses (0.067 Hz) to 0 mV from a Vh of −50 mV (tail artery) or to 10 mV from a Vh of −80 mV (aorta). Data were collected once the current amplitude had been stabilized (usually 7–10 min after the whole‐cell configuration had been obtained) by using pClamp 22.214.171.124 (Molecular Devices Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). At this point, the various protocols were performed as detailed below. IBa1.2 and ICa1.2 did not run down during the following 40 min under these conditions (Fusi et al., 2012).
K+ currents were blocked with 30 mM tetraethylammonium in the external solution and Cs+ in the internal solution. Current values were corrected for leakage using 10 μM nifedipine, which completely blocked IBa1.2 and ICa1.2.
Data are reported as mean ± SEM; n is the number of cells or rings analysed (indicated in parentheses), isolated from at least three animals. Analysis of data was accomplished by using pClamp 126.96.36.199 software (Molecular Devices Corporation) and GraphPad Prism version 5.04 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The AUC, used as a cumulative measurement of drug effect, was calculated to compare the concentration‐response curves recorded at 30 mM and 60 mM K+. The area was computed, using the trapezoid rule, in units of the X axis multiplied by the units of the Y axis.
Statistical analyses and significance as measured by one‐way or repeated measures anova (followed by either Dunnett's or Bonferroni's post hoc test), one sample t test or Student's t test for paired or unpaired samples (two‐tailed) were obtained using GraphPad InStat version 3.06 (GraphPad Software, USA). Post hoc tests were performed only when anova found a significant value of F and no variance in homogeneity. In all comparisons, P < 0.05 was considered significant. The pharmacological response to each substance was described in terms of either pEC50 or pIC50.
The PSS contained (in mM): NaCl 118; KCl 4.75; KH2PO4 1.19; MgSO4 .1.19; NaHCO3 25; glucose 11.5; CaCl2 . 2.5; gassed with a 95% O2–5% CO2 gas mixture to a pH of 7.4. PSS containing KCl at a concentration greater than 4.75 mM was prepared by replacing NaCl with equimolar KCl.
External solution contained (in mM): 130 NaCl, 5.6 KCl, 10 HEPES, 20 glucose, 1.2 MgCl2 and 5 Na‐pyruvate; pH 7.4. The internal solution contained (in mM) 100 CsCl, 10 HEPES, 11 EGTA, 1 CaCl2 . (pCa 8.4), 2 MgCl2, 5 Na‐pyruvate, 5 succinic acid, 5 oxalacetic acid, 3 Na2‐ATP and 5 phosphocreatine; pH was adjusted to 7.4 with CsOH.
The osmolarity of the tetraethylammonium‐ and Ca2+ or Ba2+‐containing external solution (320 mosmol) and that of the internal solution (290 mosmol; Stansfeld and Mathie, 1993) was measured with an osmometer (Osmostat OM 6020, Menarini Diagnostics, Florence, Italy).
Phenylephrine, ACh, collagenase (type XI), trypsin inhibitor, bovine serum albumin, papain, DL‐dithiothreitol, hyaluronidase, tetraethylammonium chloride, EGTA, HEPES, taurine, Bay K 8644 (methyl (4S)‐2,6‐dimethyl‐5‐nitro‐4‐[2‐(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]‐1,4‐dihydropyridine‐3‐carboxylate) and nifedipine were from Sigma Chimica (Milan, Italy); sodium nitroprusside was from Riedel‐De Haën AG (Seelze‐Hannover, Germany). MuA was isolated from the dried, powdered roots of Glycosmis stenocarpa (Drake) Guilt., as previously described (Cuong et al., 2004). MuA (473 mM stock solution), dissolved directly in DMSO, Bay K 8644 and nifedipine, dissolved in ethanol, were diluted at least 1000 times prior to use. All these solutions were stored at −20°C and protected from light by wrapping containers with aluminium foil. The resulting concentrations of DMSO and ethanol (below 0.1%, v v−1) did not affect responses of the preparations. Phenylephrine was dissolved in 0.1 M HCl. Sodium nitroprusside was dissolved in distilled water. All other substances used were of analytical grade and used without further purification.
The rat Cav1.2 channel α1C subunit sequence (NP_036649.2) was retrieved from the NCBI Protein Database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/). This has four repeats, each containing six transmembrane helices (S1–S6) and a P‐loop between S5 and S6 (Cheng et al., 2009). The quality of a homology model is given by the accuracy of the sequence alignment and the resolution of the template structures used. A PSI‐BLAST search (Altschul et al., 1997) for rat α1C subunit sequences was firstly performed in order to obtain the best template of the unit and the tetrameric portion of the model. Subsequently, the sequences were aligned as previously reported (Zhorov and Tikhonov, 2004; Cheng et al., 2010). Here, the disposition of both P‐loops and inner helices was derived from earlier structure templates. Therefore, complete, suitable templates were the KvAP (1ORQ pdb) (Jiang et al., 2003) and the KvAP (2R9R pdb) for the reconstruction of the unit and the tetramer respectively.
When viewed from the extracellular side, the repeats I–IV were arranged clockwise around the central pore (Cheng et al., 2009). This channel model was built using the SwissPdbViewer‐DeepView version 4.1 (Guex and Peitsch, 1997), which allowed us also to define the consistency of bond distances, bond angles and torsion angles with the values of standard proteins. The structure of the channel model was energetically minimized using the Gromacs package (Berendsen et al., 2012) equipped with the AMBER force field (Sorin and Pande, 2005) till a final convergence of 0.01 kcal mol−1 Å−1 was achieved. The stereochemical quality of the final structure (i.e. the distribution of ϕ and ψ angles) was assessed by means of PROCHECK program (Laskowski et al., 1993). With this test, no severely disallowed atomic contacts were detected, suggesting essentially good stereochemistry, with 86.1% and 11.0% of the amino acid residues in the most favoured and additional allowed regions, respectively, and with 2.1% and 0.8% residues in generously allowed and disallowed regions of the Ramachandran plot.
Docking of ligands (nifedipine, Bay K 8644 and MuA) was simulated by using flexible side chains protocol with AutoDock/Vina version 1.1 (Trott and Olson, 2010). This program used an iterated local search global optimizer algorithm based on a succession of steps, which consisted of mutation and local optimization. Ligand structures were retrieved from the PubChem database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pcsubstance/), and pdbqt files were generated by using scripts included in the Molecular Graphics Laboratory (MGL) tools (Morris et al., 2009). The generation and affinity grid maps, view of docking poses and analysis of virtual screening results were carried out by using AutoDock plug‐in of PyMOL. The dimensions of the box for docking calculation (60 Å × 60 Å × 60 Å) were sufficiently great to include not only the active docking site, as previously suggested (Cosconati et al., 2007), but also significant portions of the surrounding surface.
In silico alanine scanning mutagenesis was performed by using the ABS‐Scan tool 2 (Anand et al., 2014). Each amino acid residue present at the binding site was computationally mutated to alanine and the ligand interaction energy recalculated for each mutant. The corresponding ΔΔG values were computed by comparing them with the wild type protein, thus allowing the evaluation of individual residue contribution towards ligand interaction.
To determine the involvement of Cav1.2 channels in the vascular activity of MuA, its effect was evaluated on the contraction induced by both 30 mM and 60 mM K+ in aorta rings. As shown in Figure 1A, MuA caused a concentration‐dependent relaxation of the preparations. Rings contracted by 60 mM K+ relaxed fully in the presence of 473 μM MuA with a pIC50 value of 4.22 ± 0.13 (n = 6) and an AUC value of 109.6 ± 13.0. Furthermore, maximal relaxation was significantly greater than that recorded in preparations contracted by phenylephrine (see Supporting Information Fig. S1; P < 0.05, Student's t test for unpaired samples). When rings were depolarized with 30 mM K+, the concentration‐response curve was shifted upward (Figure 1A), showing an AUC value of 180.5 ± 25.3 (n = 6; P < 0.05 Student's t test for unpaired samples). MuA, at concentrations ≤47.3 μM, caused an increase in K+‐induced vascular tone while at higher concentrations, partly reversed the contraction, showing a relative pIC50 value of 4.07 ± 0.10 μM (n = 6).
Murrayafoline A potentiated, in a concentration‐dependent manner, the contractile response to K+ (Figure 1B) causing a leftward shift of the K+ concentration‐response curve. pEC50 values for K+ changed from 1.61 ± 0.04 (2.1 mM DMSO; n = 12) to 1.67 ± 0.04 (1.4 μM MuA, n = 13; P > 0.05, Dunnett's post hoc test), 1.78 ± 0.04 (4.7 μM MuA, n = 14; P < 0.05) and 1.80 ± 0.05 (14.2 μM MuA, n = 14; P < 0.05). Potentiation of responses to K+ by 14.2 μM MuA was greater at 15 mM K+, being 409.6% of control, as compared with that observed at higher K+ concentrations (157.0% and 124.3% at 30 mM and 60 mM K+ respectively). MuA, however, did not modify the maximal response to K+.
To define the effects of MuA on aorta rings, the same experiments described earlier were repeated, using the Cav1.2 channel agonist Bay K 8644 instead of MuA. When the effect of Bay K 8644 on the contraction induced by high K+ concentrations was evaluated in aorta rings, a concentration‐dependent and marked increase of muscle tone in preparations contracted by 30 mM K+ was observed, whilst in rings contracted by 60 mM K+, this was considerably smaller (Figure 2A). The AUC values were 214.3 ± 36.7 (n = 7) and 91.1 ± 20.6 (n = 6; P < 0.05 Student's t test for unpaired samples) respectively.
Any potential pharmacological interactions between MuA and Bay K 8644 were assessed in rings contracted by the addition of 3 mM Ca2+ to the Ca2+‐free, 60 mM K+‐containing PSS. In rings pre‐treated with DMSO, 10 nM Bay K 8644 increased Ca2+‐induced contraction by about 40% (Figure 2B). MuA, at concentrations of 47.3 μM and 142 μM, significantly antagonized the Bay K 8644‐induced increase.
Ca2+ influx stimulated by Cav1.2 channel agonists may be completely buffered by the superficial sarcoplasmic reticulum or even prevented if channels are not pre‐activated with low K+ concentrations. However, addition of MuA to rings either bathed in normal PSS or pre‐treated with 1 μM thapsigargin or 15 mM K+ failed to induce mechanical responses (data not shown). When this assay was performed with Bay K 8644, in normal PSS, a concentration‐dependent contraction was recorded in seven out of 17 preparations (pEC50 value of 7.53 ± 0.24, n = 7). In rings pre‐incubated with 15 mM K+ or 1 μM thapsigargin, the concentration‐response curves to Bay K 8644 shifted to the left (pEC50 value of 8.33 ± 0.19, n = 11, P > 0.05 and 9.13 ± 0.41, n = 6, P < 0.05, Dunnett's post hoc test). In the former case (15 mM K+), an increase in drug efficacy was also observed (data not shown).
The contribution of Cav1.2 channel modulation to the effects of MuA on vascular rings was assessed on IBa1.2 recorded in isolated aorta myocytes. At Vh of −80 mV, MuA stimulated the current in a concentration‐dependent manner with a pEC50 value of 5.33 ± 0.08 (n = 7) (Figure 3A). At 47.3 μM this stimulatory effect was less evident, whilst at 473.4 μM, MuA clearly inhibited IBa1.2. Similar results (pEC50 value of 5.26 ± 0.10, n = 7; P > 0.05) were obtained in tail artery myocytes. Therefore, an in‐depth analysis of MuA effects on IBa1.2 was performed on the latter cells, whose biophysical and pharmacological properties are well characterized (Mugnai et al., 2014 and references therein). MuA modulation of the current through Cav1.2 channels was not affected by changes of either the charge carrier or Vh. In fact, when equimolar Ca2+ replaced Ba2+ in the external solution or when Vh was changed to −50 mV, the stimulatory potency was not modified (pEC50 5.60 ± 0.12, n = 5 and 5.44 ± 0.03, n = 9, respectively; P > 0.05).
IBa1.2 evoked at 0 mV from a Vh of −50 mV activated and then declined with time courses that could be fitted by a mono‐exponential function. MuA did not affect significantly either the τ for inactivation or that for activation at all concentrations tested (data not shown).
Figure 3B shows the time course of the effects of MuA on IBa1.2 recorded from Vh of −50 mV to a test potential of 0 mV. After the current had reached steady values, the addition to bath solution of 14.2 μM MuA produced a gradual increase of the current that reached a plateau in about 4 min. Current amplitude stimulation was only partially reversible upon drug washout but still blocked by the Ca2+ antagonist nifedipine. Furthermore, MuA‐induced stimulation of IBa1.2 was stable for about 30 min.
The current–voltage relationships recorded at Vh of −50 mV (Figure 4A) show that 14.2 μM MuA significantly increased the peak IBa1.2 without altering either the maximum at 10 mV or the threshold at approximately −30 mV. The relative value of IBa1.2 stimulation by MuA (Figure 4, inset) was constant in the range of membrane potential values of −20 to 30 mV. In addition, drug washout partially reversed MuA‐induced stimulation of IBa1.2 at most of the tested membrane potentials.
The voltage dependence of MuA‐induced current modulation was further investigated by analysing the steady‐state inactivation and activation curves for IBa1.2. MuA (14.2 μM) failed to affect both the 50% inactivation potential (−17.88 ± 1.27 mV, control and −19.96 ± 1.66 mV, MuA; n = 6; P > 0.05, Student's t test for paired samples) and the slope factor (−7.57 ± 0.16 mV and −7.62 ± 0.64 mV; P > 0.05) of the steady‐state inactivation curve (Figure 4B).
The activation curves, calculated from the current–voltage relationships showed in Figure 4A, were fitted to the Boltzmann equation. MuA significantly decreased the 50% activation potential (−6.65 ± 1.24 mV, control and −9.47 ± 1.18 mV, MuA, n = 6; P < 0.05, repeated measures anova and Dunnett's post hoc test) without changing the slope factor (6.65 ± 0.51 mV and 6.32 ± 0.32 mV; Figure 4B). Drug washout fully reversed this effect (50% activation potential −7.07 ± 1.08 mV and slope factor 6.14 ± 0.28 mV; P > 0.05).
To determine in silico the interaction of MuA with the Cav1.2 channel protein, the homology model of the central pore of the rat α1c subunit was reconstructed in accordance with Cheng et al. (2009). Docking calculations performed with the reference dihydropyridines, nifedipine and Bay K 8644, showed similar ΔG values (Table 1). Moreover, the two molecules positioned inside the pocket in a superimposable manner (Figure 5A). By interacting with specific parts of the channel pore, nifedipine and Bay K 8644 formed H‐bonds with the same key dihydropyridine‐sensing amino acid residues of three different helices (Figure 5B): Tyr1178 (IIIS6) with the NH group and Gln1069 (IIIS5) and Tyr1489 (IVS5) with the COOCH3 groups. On the contrary, MuA, which showed a less favourable ΔG value (Table 1), had a different pose (Figure 5A) characterized by the absence of H‐bonds (Figure 5B).
In silico alanine scanning mutagenesis gave rise to remarkably similar ΔΔG values for both nifedipine and Bay K 8644 (Figure 5C), whereas MuA exhibited a rather different profile, some residues even appearing unfavourable to its binding.
Because docking analysis suggested that MuA binds the Cav1.2 channel binding pocket at a site that can bind also nifedipine and Bay K 8644, the functional interaction between this alkaloid and the two dihydropyridines was investigated. Bay K 8644 (100 nM) stimulated IBa1.2 in the range from −30 to 50 mV and shifted the maximum of the current–voltage relationships by 10 mV in the hyperpolarizing direction (Figure 6A). The activation curves, calculated from the current–voltage relationships shown in Figure 6A, were fitted to the Boltzmann equation. Bay K 8644 significantly decreased the 50% activation potential (−5.72 ± 0.72 mV, control and −13.95 ± 0.82 mV, Bay K 8644, n = 6; P < 0.05, repeated measures anova and Dunnett's post hoc test) and changed the slope factor (from 6.22 ± 0.30 mV to 4.67 ± 0.26 mV; P < 0.05) (Figure 6A inset). The subsequent addition of 14.2 μM MuA did not modify Bay K 8644‐induced effects on both IBa1.2 amplitude and activation curve (50% activation potential −13.71 ± 0.57 mV and slope factor 5.20 ± 0.20 mV; P > 0.05).
Under control conditions, the current evoked at 0 mV from a Vh of −50 mV activated and then declined with time courses that could be fitted by mono‐exponential functions (Figure 6B). Bay K 8644 (100 nM) significantly prolonged the τ for activation and reduced that for inactivation: the subsequent addition of MuA brought only the τ for activation almost to control values, without affecting that for inactivation.
The antagonistic effect of nifedipine was determined under control conditions as well as in myocytes pre‐treated with MuA or Bay K 8644. Nifedipine inhibited IBa1.2 in a concentration‐dependent manner with a pIC50 value of 7.67 ± 0.06 (n = 6; Figure 7A,D). Similar results were obtained in the presence of 14.2 μM MuA (pIC50 value of 7.60 ± 0.10, n = 6; P > 0.05, one‐way anova and Dunnett's post hoc test; Figure 7B,D). On the contrary, when IBa1.2 was stimulated with 100 nM Bay K 8644, the concentration‐response curve to nifedipine was shifted to the right (pIC50 value of 6.42 ± 0.08, n = 7; P < 0.05; Figure 7C,D).
Murrayafoline A has been shown recently to enhance contractility and increase Ca2+ influx in single rat ventricular myocytes (Son et al., 2014), behaving like a stimulator of Cav1.2 channels. However, its effects on vascular function are unknown. The present investigation demonstrated that MuA was able either to stimulate or to inhibit contraction of vascular smooth muscle by directly activating or blocking Cav1.2 channels, respectively, depending on the concentration used. This conclusion is supported not only by indirect, functional observations but also by direct electrophysiological data and docking analysis.
The mechanical and electrophysiological effects of MuA were compared with those of the synthetic Cav1.2 channel activator Bay K 8644 (Hess et al., 1984). Both vascular smooth muscle active tone and IBa1.2 stimulation induced by MuA shared some basic features with those sustained by Bay K 8644. Thus, MuA, like Bay K 8644, stimulated the active tone of aorta rings depolarized with 30 mM K+, this effect disappearing when K+ concentration raised up to 60 mM (i.e. in fully activated preparations). Furthermore, it shifted the K+ concentration‐response curve to the left without changing its maximum (for Bay K 8644, see Fusi et al., 2003). Finally, at low concentrations, both drugs stimulated IBa1.2 in a nifedipine‐sensitive manner. Collectively, these findings suggest that MuA, like Bay K 8644, affected the vascular Cav1.2 channel protein.
Murrayafoline A, added either before or after K+, enhanced tissue responses to low, but not to high depolarizing stimuli. ‘Sensitization’ to K+ is generally observed with drugs, like Bay K 8644, that facilitate the voltage‐dependent activation of Cav1.2 channels (this paper), thus shifting the curve relating tension development and depolarizing stimulus (i.e. membrane potential) to lower K+ concentrations (i.e. more negative values; see Fusi et al., 2003). This hypothesis was confirmed by the Boltzmann analysis (activation curve) of the current–voltage relationship, showing that MuA, similarly to Bay K 8644, significantly decreased the 50% activation potential of IBa1.2.
Murrayafoline A caused a parallel leftward shift of the K+ concentration‐response curve as well as a relatively constant stimulation of current amplitude over a broad range of membrane potentials. These data suggested that the drug most likely increased the open probability of the channel and that its action on the channel was voltage‐independent. However, only single‐channel recordings comparing the effect of Bay K 8644 and MuA may provide direct evidence for this possibility.
Ca2+ channel activators, such as Bay K 8644, are able to evoke full contractile, tonic responses in vascular smooth muscle preparations, mainly when they are depolarized with low K+ concentrations (this paper; Usowicz et al., 1995; Fusi et al., 2003) or when the Ca2+ buffering activity of the superficial sarcoplasmic reticulum is impaired (this paper; Asano and Nomura, 1999). This means that, on one hand, Cav1.2 channel activation is voltage‐dependent, and therefore, channels have to be activated in order to respond to Ca2+‐agonist drugs. On the other hand, Ca2+ influx triggered by the Ca2+‐agonist drug can induce a maximum muscle contraction only in the absence of a functional sarcoplasmic reticulum. MuA, however, did not elicit significant mechanical responses in rat aorta rings either under control conditions or in the presence of thapsigargin or moderate concentrations of K+, thus suggesting that its potency and efficacy were much lower than those of Bay K 8644. Finally, Bay K 8644, at variance with MuA, affected IBa1.2 kinetics and stimulated IBa1.2 maximally at weak depolarization values, causing a leftward shift in the maximum of the current–voltage relationship (Wang et al., 1989; McDonald et al., 1994; Saponara et al., 2008; this paper).
When used at high concentrations, MuA acted mostly as a Ca2+ channel blocker. Several pieces of evidence concur to this conclusion. First, MuA reversed the contraction induced by high K+, in agreement with data already published by Wu et al. (1998), this relaxant effect becoming more pronounced at higher depolarization levels (i.e. depending on membrane potential; Bean, 1984; Kuriyama et al., 1995). Vasorelaxation induced by Ca2+ channel blockers is directly correlated to the extracellular concentration of K+, as it is the case with nifedipine, whose potency increases as the membrane voltage (i.e. the concentration of extracellular K+) increases (McDonald et al., 1994). Second, MuA‐induced relaxation was lower when phenylephrine, instead of a high concentration of K+, was employed to contract the vessel, in line with the observation that Cav1.2 channels play only a secondary role in this type of contraction (McFadzean and Gibson, 2002), as observed with nifedipine (Gurney, 1994). Third, it inhibited IBa1.2 in single myocytes isolated from both aorta and tail artery. Because this effect was observed independently of the charge carrier used, a Ca2+‐dependent inactivation of the channel subsequent to current stimulation can be ruled out.
In the computational study, where a model of the α1C subunit central pore region was reconstructed to perform in silico molecular docking analysis, Bay K 8644, nifedipine and MuA showed favourable free‐energy binding values. In particular, those related to dihydropyridines are in agreement with already published data (Cosconati et al., 2007; Tikhonov and Zhorov, 2009; Senatore et al., 2011), thus confirming the validity of the model constructed. The two dihydropyridines used in this study showed similar ΔG values and fitted inside the pocket stabilizing the channel conformation by forming H‐bonds with key sensing amino acid residues, as previously established by Zhorov (2013). Conversely, MuA lacked the H‐bonds formed by the dihydropyridines and showed a less favourable ΔG value. In agreement with these data, the in silico alanine scanning mutagenesis showed that the ΔΔG profile shared by nifedipine and Bay K 8644 was not reproduced for MuA, supporting the hypothesis that MuA and the dihydropyridines shared only some amino acid residues when they docked in the pocket of the channel central pore unit. These results corroborate those obtained in vitro. On one hand they clearly point to MuA as a novel ligand of Cav1.2 channels, able to (i) bind as the reference, dihydropyridine ligands to the pore‐forming α1C subunit; (ii) prevent Bay K 8644‐induced facilitation of extracellular Ca2+ influx; and (iii) partly reverse the effects of Bay K 8644 on current kinetics. On the other hand, the less favourable fit of MuA within the pocket might explain why the drug (i) failed to antagonize nifedipine blockade of the current, unlike Bay K 8644; (ii) displayed a low potency and efficacy; (iii) did not affect IBa1.2 stimulated by Bay K 8644, even if tested at concentrations two orders of magnitude higher; and (iv) was not characterized by a voltage‐dependence as well as a sigmoidal concentration‐dependence.
When the effects of MuA on vascular and cardiac (Son et al., 2014) Cav1.2 channels are compared, interesting similarities emerge. In both tissues, in fact, MuA induced a concentration‐dependent, nifedipine‐sensitive stimulation of IBa1.2, without altering the current kinetics. Additionally, current stimulation was bell‐shaped, although the highest concentration assessed in cardiomyocytes was only 200 μM, that is, 2.5‐fold lower than that tested in vascular myocytes. On the contrary, vascular preparations seemed to be more sensitive to MuA as the pEC50 value was one order of magnitude lower than that recorded in cardiomyocytes. Finally, in cardiomyocytes, MuA stimulation of Ca2+ sparks and Ca2+ transients depends on PKC activation (Kim et al., 2015), while its modulatory activity on rat tail artery Cav1.2 channel, where PKC plays a stimulatory role (Navedo et al., 2005), was not significantly affected by the PKC inhibitors GF109203X and Gö6976 (Supporting Information Fig. S2). This finding once more suggests that MuA might directly activate the Cav1.2 channel in vascular myocytes.
In conclusion, the present findings show that the carbazole alkaloid MuA can be included among the molecules of natural origin capable of modulating the voltage‐dependent Cav1.2 channel in vascular as well as in cardiac (Son et al., 2014) myocytes, by docking at the α1C subunit central pore in a different way from that of the dihydropyridines. Vietnamese medicinal plants represent a valuable source for the discovery of novel pharmacological agents that can be useful in the analysis of the basic structure and function of Cav1.2 channels.
F.F. and N.M.C. designed the research study; T.T.H., P.N.K. and N.T.S. prepared the murrayafoline A; M.D., P. M., O.S. and F.F. carried out the experiments; M.D., O.S. and F.F. analysed the data; F.F., S.S., O.S. and G.S. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figure S1 Effect of murrayafoline A on phenylephrine‐induced contraction of rat aorta rings. Concentration‐response curves of MuA in endothelium‐denuded rings precontracted by 0.3 µM phenylephrine. In the ordinate scale, response is reported as percentage of the initial tension induced by phenylephrine (phe), taken as 100%. Data points are mean ± SEM (n = 6).
Figure S2 Murrayafoline A modulation of Ba1.2 of single rat tail artery myocytes. Effect of GF109203X and Gö6976 on MuA‐induced modulation of Ba1.2. Concentration‐dependent effect of MuA measured at Vh of −50 mV in the absence (control) or presence of either 5 µM GF109203X or 100 nM Gö6976. On the ordinate scale, response is given as a percentage of control. Data points are mean ± SEM. (n = 5–9). * P < 0.05 vs. control (100%), one sample t test.
Supporting info item
This work was supported by the National Foundation for Science and Technology Development of Vietnam (NAFOSTED; grant No. 104.01‐2010.25) and by the Ministero degli Affari Esteri (Rome, Italy), as stipulated by Law 212 (26‐2‐1992), to the project ‘Discovery of novel cardiovascular active agents from selected Vietnamese medicinal plants’. Miriam Durante and Paolo Mugnai received a personal PhD scholarship from the University of Siena. We wish to thank Dr. M. Lenoci for the assistance in some preliminary experiments.
Saponara S., Durante M., Spiga O., Mugnai P., Sgaragli G., Huong T., Khanh P., Son N., Cuong N., and Fusi F. (2016) Functional, electrophysiological and molecular docking analysis of the modulation of Cav1.2 channels in rat vascular myocytes by murrayafoline A. British Journal of Pharmacology, 173: 292–304. doi: 10.1111/bph.13369.