Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of springeropenLink to Publisher's site
Environmental Science and Pollution Research International
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017; 24(3): 2966–2979.
Published online 2016 November 14. doi:  10.1007/s11356-016-8003-4
PMCID: PMC5340854

Surface sediment properties and heavy metal pollution assessment in the Pearl River Estuary, China


Grain size and concentrations of heavy metals (arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn)) of 148 surface sediments and activities of 210Pb and heavy metal concetrantions of one sediment core from the Pearl River Estuary were analyzed. The surface sediments were dominated by silt and sandy silt. Sediment type controlled the spatial distribution patterns of the heavy metals. The heavy metal concentrations in the sediments ranged from 3.34 to 37.11 mg/kg for As, 0.06 to 2.06 mg/kg for Cd, 12 to 130 mg/kg for Cr, 5.8 to 170.6 mg/kg for Cu, 0.01 to 0.25 mg/kg for Hg, 23 to 78 mg/kg for Pb, and 32 to 259 mg/kg for Zn. Both contents of clay and organic carbons were significantly positively correlated with heavy metals. The baseline values of elements in the study area were 12.97 mg/kg for As, 0.14 mg/kg for Cd, 68 mg/kg for Cr, 28.9 mg/kg for Cu, 0.08 mg/kg for Hg, 33 mg/kg for Pb, and 92 mg/kg for Zn. The metal enrichment factor (EF) and geoaccumulation index (Igeo) were calculated to assess anthropogenic contamination. Results showed slight to moderate Cd contamination in the region. Principle component analysis indicated that Cd could be attributed to anthropogenic sources; As and Hg were predominantly affected by human activities; and Pb, Cr, Cu, and Zn were associated with both natural and anthropogenic sources.

Keywords: Sediment properties, Heavy metals, Pollution assessment, Pearl River Estuary


Heavy metals are of considerable environmental concern due to their toxicity, multiple sources, nonbiodegradable properties, and accumulative behaviors. Estuaries, which are regions of active land-ocean interaction, respond sensitively to natural processes and anthropogenic activities (Li et al. 2007). Estuarine sediments are recognized as an important sink for heavy metals and other contaminants (Ip et al. 2004) and have attracted much attention (Hu et al. 2013a; Venkatramanan et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2014b; Woods et al. 2012; Xu et al. 2014; Yang et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2015a; Zhang et al. 2015b). Heavy metal contamination in sediments can affect water quality and thus the bioassimilation and bioaccumulation of metals in aquatic organisms, resulting in long-term implications for human and ecosystem health (Ip et al. 2007; Li et al. 2004; Raghunath et al. 1999). A thorough understanding of the depositional characteristics of surface sediments and pollutants is critical for the assessment of heavy metal pollution in marine environments (Xu et al. 2015b; Xu et al. 2015c).

The Pearl River Estuary (PRE) links the Pearl River, which is one of the largest rivers in southern China, and the South China Sea. The Pearl River is composed of three main river channels: West River (Xijiang) is the main channel in the network and is confluent with the East (Dongjiang) and North (Beijiang) Rivers in the lower reaches of the PRE (Lu et al. 2007). The lower alluvial and delta plains of the Pearl River are composed of Quaternary fluvial sediments (Lu et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 2007). In recent years, increasing population density and rapid industrial and agricultural development have resulted in severe stress on the aquatic environment of the PRE (Li and Huang 2008) and the introduction of many pollutants carrying heavy metals to the estuarine sediment (Chen et al. 2012). Although considerable effort has been made to investigate heavy metal pollution in PRE sediments (Chen et al. 2012; Ip et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2012; Yang et al. 2012; Ye et al. 2012; Yu et al. 2010), sampling density and heavy metal indexes are limited.

Based on high sampling density and seven heavy metal indexes, the present research aimed to (1) study the spatial distribution of grain size and heavy metals in surface sediments, (2) assess the state of heavy metal contamination using the enrichment factor (EF) and geo-accumulation index (Igeo), and (3) analyze and distinguish the possible sources of heavy metals.

Materials and methods


We collected 148 surface sediment (0–5 cm) samples and one 196 cm long sediment core (SSZ15) from the PRE in January 2008 (Fig. (Fig.1).1). During sampling, each surface sample was placed in a clean cloth bag, and then enclosed in a polyethylene bag in the field. Once returned to the laboratory, the samples were fully air dried at room temperature, sieved through a 10 mesh (< 2 mm) nylon sieve, and then enclosed in a new polyethylene bag individually for later chemical analysis. The core sample was taken with a vibrating sampler and sliced in 4 cm long sections for grain size, element, and radionuclide analysis.

Fig. 1
Location of the study area and sampling sites

Laboratory analysis

Sediment samples were pretreated with 10 % H2O2 to digest the organic matter. Excessive H2O2 solution was removed by heating and evaporation. After that, 0.5 % of sodium hexametaphosphate was added to the samples for sediment dispersal, with the mixture then analyzed with a Mastersizer 2000 laser particle-size analyzer (Malvern Ltd., UK) at the Experiment-Testing Center for Marine Geology, Ministry of Land and Resources, China (ISO 17025 laboratory accreditation). Grain-size parameters were calculated following classification from Folk and Ward (1957).

Samples were treated and determined according to the analytical elements. (1) Cd and Cu measurements were carried out using inductive coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The samples were dried and ground to 63 μm before analysis, and the sediments were digested by adding a mixture of 9:5:2 HNO3 + HCl + HF to 0.5 g of the powdered samples and heating to 180 °C for 2 h (GB17378.5, Editorial Board of National Standards Press 1998) in closed Teflon bombs on a heating plate. These digestion steps were repeated with an additional acid until only a negligible amount of white residue remained. Each sample was then leached with diluted HNO3 and the solution was analyzed. (2) As and Hg were analyzed using atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS). (3) Cr, Pb, Zn, Al2O3, Fe2O3, K2O, CaO, Mn, and Sr were measured by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (PANalytical AXIOS PW4400) after samples were pelletized, as per Xia et al. (2008). Calibration was made using certified reference materials and α correction was applied to correct for matrix interferences. (4) Organic carbon (Corg) was determined by wet oxidation in an acid dichromate solution, followed by back titration of the remaining dichromate using a ferrous ammonium sulfate solution. The analytical methods and detection limits of the above element determinations are listed in Table Table1.1. Sediment reference materials (GBW07317, GSS1, GSS2 and GSS8) were used as analytical quality controls. The recoveries were between 90 and 99 % for all metals, with a precision of 10%.

Table 1
Analytical methods and detection limits

Both 210Pb and 226Ra were analyzed using the BE3830 gamma-ray spectrometer (Canberra Co., USA) at the Testing Center of the Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, China Geological Survey, following a procedure similar to that of Xia et al. (2011). Counting uncertainties associated with sample measurements were typically less than 10%. Supported 210Pb activities were assumed to be equal to the measured 226Ra activities, and 210Pb activities (210Pbxs) were calculated by subtracting the supported 210Pb activities from total 210Pb activities (210Pbtot) (San Miguel et al. 2004). The sediment accumulation rates were calculated by the constant rate of 210Pb supply (CRS) model (Appleby and Oldfield 1992). The 210Pb geochronology was calculated using the equation:

Tλ−1 · ln(A0/Ah)

where A 0 and A h are the 210Pbxs accumulation fluxes below the sediment-water interface and depth h, respectively, and λ is the 210Pbxs radioactive decay constant (0.03114 year−1).

Results and discussion

Distribution patterns of grain size, Al, heavy metals, and Corg in sediments

As shown in Fig. Fig.2,2, the surface sediments in the PRE were dominated by silt, with a certain portion of clay and sand. On average, silt, clay, and sand accounted for 62, 22, and 16% of the material, respectively. Surface sediments mainly consisted of coarse-grained materials, indicating strong hydrodynamic conditions in the study area. According to Folk and Ward (1957), sediment in this region was classified into mud, silt, sandy mud, sandy silt, and silty sand (Fig. (Fig.2).2). Silt and sandy silt were the most widely distributed sediments, accounting for 84% of all samples (Fig. (Fig.33).

Fig. 2
Percentage concentration of sand, silt, and clay (black lines) and sediment classification (red lines) in PRE
Fig. 3
Spatial distribution of the surface sediment types in PRE

Overall, the distributions of surface sediment yielded a coarse-fine-coarse trend from north to south (Fig. (Fig.3).3). The northern region exhibited sandy deposition due to estuary runoff. Coarse particle distribution was basically parallel to the water channel and was also observed in the northeastern region of Zhuhai City. The middle region displayed transitional deposition, with a mixture of estuary and shelf sea silt. The southern region demonstrated sandy deposition based on its marine environment. Due to anthropogenic influence, especially nearby activities such as desilting and dredging, the original terrain of these regions, particularly that in the north, has been destroyed and depressions and shoals have increased, displaying no regular distribution. Hydrodynamic characteristics have changed, resulting in the diversity of grain size distribution in the PRE surface sediments (Xia 2005). Maximum enrichment of Al also occurred in the middle region but reduced both north and south. Minimum Al content was found around Qi-Ao Island, which is covered by silty sand (Fig. (Fig.4).4). Relative higher concentrations of Fe203 were recorded by sediments along the west-side of the PRE (Fig. (Fig.44).

Fig. 4Fig. 4
Concentrations of heavy metals, Corg, Al2O3, and Fe2O3 in the surface sediments of PRE

The heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Pb, and Zn) and Corg of the surface sediment samples from the PRE are listed in Table Table2.2. The concentrations of Corg ranged from 0.16 to 1.85%, with an average of 0.9%, which is higher than that of the Changhua River Estuary and adjacent shelf (0.55%) (Dou et al. 2013) and the Yangtze River Estuary (0.7 %) (Zhang et al. 2009a). The spatial distribution of Cd and Cu varied considerably, with the coefficients of variation of 79.18 and 48.67% (Table (Table2),2), respectively, demonstrating that these metals might be from point-source input and the similar finding was found in the previous study (Wang et al. 2014a). The spatial distributions of heavy metals and Corg concentrations in the study area are shown in Fig. Fig.44 and, in general, showed similar patterns. Surface heavy metal distributions exhibit different underlying patterns due to different depositional environments, and distinct patterns of distribution have been identified in the PRE (Heise et al. 2010; Woods et al. 2012). Heise et al. (2010) utilizing principle component hierarchical cluster analysis to define and classify the PRE into four distinct areas: class 1, comprising of mainly coarser sediments; class 2, consisting of sediments dominated by eroded granite from the northeastern catchment area of the estuary; class 3, representing the influence of the marine environment and situated in the southernmost part of the outer Ling Ding Yang Estuary; and class 4, consisting of fine sediment deposited at high sedimentation rates and extending from the west to the Ling Ding Yang Channel. As shown in Fig. Fig.4,4, all heavy metal concentrations decreased in the southeastern part of the estuary, an area with considerable marine influence (class 3), and the northern part of the estuary, an area with coarser sediments (class 1).

Table 2
Mean grain size, organic carbon (Corg), and heavy metal concentration in the surface sediments of PRE

The concentrations of As, Cr, Hg, Pb, Zn, and Cd were high in the western shoal (class 3), consistent with that of other studies (Li et al. 2000a; Li et al. 2000b; Liu et al. 2003; Peng et al. 2003; Shi et al. 2006). A large number of terrigenous contaminants entering the estuary (Humen Gate, Jiaomen Gate, Hongqimen Gate, and Hengmen Gate) move southwest under the action of Coriolis force and coastal currents (Peng et al. 2003) and were thus deposited with sediments in the western shoal (class 3). In addition, mud and silt, which benefit the absorption and deposition of heavy metals (Qian et al. 1996; Zhang et al. 2009b), were widely distributed in the western shoal (Fig. (Fig.3).3). All heavy metals showed lower content in the eastern area (class 2) compared with that in the western shoal (class 3). High concentrations of Cr, Cu, and Zn accumulated on a small scale in the northeast of the PRE (Class 2) (Fig. (Fig.4),4), where the Dongbao River from Shenzhen city empties into the Pearl River (Jia et al. 2001). The sewage of the electroplate factory was the important source of Cr, Cu and Zn in Dongbao River (Jia et al. 2001). Thus, the sewage of the electroplate factory likely led to the increase in Cr, Cu, and Zn contamination in this area.

The Pearson correlation (PC) coefficients among the heavy metals, major elements, Corg, and clay in the sediments are shown in Table Table3.3. All metals were positively correlated with clay content and Corg, suggesting that sediment size and organic carbon content might exert certain control over the abundance and regional distribution of heavy metals in the surface sediments of the PRE.

Table 3
Pearson correlation coefficient matrix of heavy metals, major elements, Corg, and clay in the surface sediments of PRE

Comparisons of the heavy metals in the study area with those of other regions in China are listed in Table Table4.4. Compared with that reported by Yu et al. (2010), the contents of Cr, Pb, and Zn in this study were lower, but Cu was comparable. Contrarily, the contents of As, Cd, Pb, and Zn were higher than those reported by Ye et al. (2012). Furthermore, the concentrations of heavy metals were much higher in the PRE than those reported in Daya Bay, Bohai Bay, and north Shandong Peninsula (Gao et al. 2010; Xu et al. 2015c; Yu et al. 2010). The contents of most heavy metals were higher than those in the South China Sea, Changjiang estuary, and eastern Beibu Bay but equal to that in western Xiamen Bay. Elevated high values of these heavy metals are probably due to the higher degree of industrialization in the Pearl River delta region and the increase in pollution due to rapid industrial development during the last three decades (Zhou et al. 2004). Primary sediment standard criteria are widely applied in environmental studies (CSBTS 2002). In comparison with these criteria, the contents of As and Cu in the current study were higher, whereas those of Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb, and Zn were close to the CSBTS. It is worth noting that the background value of Cu in the South China Sea is equal to that in the CSBTS (Zhang and Du 2005).

Table 4
Comparison of heavy metal of surface sediments in PRE(unit: mg/kg)

Geochronology (210Pb) and background values

The 210Pb depth profile is shown in Fig. Fig.5.5. The average sedimentation rate of SSZ15 was 1.48 cm/a, which is in agreement with the results (0.5–1.5 cm/a) of other studies in this region (Chen 1992; Chen and Luo 1991; Ye et al. 2012). The elemental concentration in the Earth’s crust (Taylor and McLennan 1995) or abundance of upper crust shale (Rudnick and Gao 2003) is usually used as the baseline value for elements. However, the assessment of contamination levels when compared with a global standard (average shale or crust composition) is not always satisfactory due to the presence of local lithological anomalies (Zhou et al. 2014). Thus, the concentrations of sediments below 150 cm (about 100 years ago) in the core SSZ15 (12.97 mg kg−1 for As, 0.14 mg kg−1 for Cd, 68 mg kg−1 for Cr, 28.9 mg kg−1 for Cu, 0.08 mg kg−1 for Hg, 33 mg kg−1 for Pb, and 92 mg kg−1 for Zn) were selected as the background values in the study area.

Fig. 5
Profile distributions of 210Pb and 210Pb-derived chronology from the core SSZ15

Assessment of heavy metal pollution

The enrichment factor (EF) is widely used to discriminate between natural and anthropogenic sources and to reflect the status of environmental contamination. It is based on the use of a normalization element to alleviate the variations produced by heterogeneous sediments (Bastami et al. 2012; Christophoridis et al. 2009; Siddique et al. 2009; Xu et al. 2015a) and is calculated using the following equation:

EF = (Cn/X)Sample/(Cn/X)baseline

where C n is the concentration of the considered element, and X is the normalization element. It was found that the relative proportion of a metal to Al in crustal material is fairly constant (Taylor 1964; Turekian and Wedepohl 1961). The ratio of heavy metals to Al can minimize the grain size effect between measured content and baseline values and reveal actual geochemical imbalance (Din 1992; Schropp et al. 1990). However, the use of a single element for normalization does not constrain which elements are enriched by human activities if used across the entire PRE, and it may be possible to better identify which elements are truly enriched by identifying and utilizing a normalization method appropriate to that region (Woods et al. 2012). Relative higher concentrations of Fe203 were found along the west-side of the study region (Fig. (Fig.4).4). In the case of the west side of the PRE, where Fe contents were elevated, the element Fe was therefore applied for normalization, while Al was used for the rest study areas. EF values between 0.5 and 1.5 (0.5 < EF < 1.5) indicate that the metals are entirely from crustal material or natural weathering processes, whereas EF values greater than 1.5 indicate an important proportion of noncrustal materials (e.g., anthropogenic influences) (Zhang and Liu 2002). The EF ranges of the heavy metals in the present study were as follows: As, 0.37–2.70 (average 1.49); Cd, 0.49–10.82 (average 2.9); Cr, 0.44–1.88 (average 1.01); Cu, 0.48–4.08 (average 1.39); Hg, 0.4–2.96 (average 1.45); Pb, 0.72–2.32 (average 1.36); and Zn, 0.79–2.64 (average 1.37). As shown in Fig. Fig.6,6, the mean EF values of As and Hg were close to 1.5, suggesting a certain potential risk. The EF values of Cd (2.9) were more than 1.5 in all sampled areas, indicating significant Cd contamination in the study area.

Fig. 6
Enrichment factor (EF) of heavy metals in the surface sediments of PRE

The Igeo, another commonly used criterion, was originally defined by Müller (1979) to evaluate heavy metal contamination in sediments by comparing current concentrations with pre-industrial levels and is defined by the following equation:

Igeo = log2 [(Cn/X)/(1.5 × Bn)/X]

where C n is the measured concentration of the examined metal (n) in the sediment, B n is the background concentration of the metal (n), and factor 1.5 is the background matrix correction factor due to lithogenic effects. X is element for the normalization. Similar to the computations of EFs, elements Fe and Al were used separately in the western region and the rest of the regions as the normalization elements, The seven Igeo classes range from class 0 (Igeo ≤0) to class 6 (Igeo >5) (Müller 1981). The Igeo values of the heavy metals in this study are shown in Fig. Fig.77 and ranged from −2.03 to 0.85 for As (average −0.08), −1.62 to 2.85 for Cd (average 0.63), −1.78 to 0.33 for Cr (average −0.59), −1.63 to 1.44 for Cu (average −0.20), −1.92 to 0.98 for Hg (average −0.12), −1.01 to 0.63 for Pb (average −0.17), and −0.92 to 0.81 for Zn (average −0.17). According to the Müller scale (Müller 1981), the Igeo values indicate no As, Cr, Cu, Hg, Pb, or Zn pollution in the study area as a whole, although some deviation was observed depending on the metal and sampling location. The Igeo value for Cd was between 0 and 1, generally indicating slight to moderate pollution in the PRE.

Fig. 7
Geo-accumulation index (Igeo) of heavy metals in the surface sediments of PRE

Sources and transport of heavy metals

Principle component analysis (PCA) is a common multivariate method used in environmental studies to investigate potential pollution sources (natural or anthropogenic) and their element characteristics (Han et al. 2006; Hu et al. 2013b; Li et al. 2013; Varol 2011). The rotated component matrixes of the PCA are presented in Table Table5.5. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s values were 0.853 and 3047.898 (df = 105, Sig < 0.01), suggesting that PCA might be useful in dimensionality reductions. The first three principal components accounted for 81.37% of total variance. The loading plot of the first three principal components of the surface samples is depicted in Fig. Fig.88.

Table 5
Total variance explained and rotated component matrix of principal components analysis
Fig. 8
Principal component loading of heavy metals, major elements, Corg, and clay

The first principal component (PC1), with high loadings of As, Cd, Hg, Cr, Cu, Zn, Pb, Fe2O3, Mn, and Corg, accounted for 46.30% of total variance (Table (Table5).5). Both EF and Igeo results indicated that Cd was clearly influenced by anthropogenic inputs, with As and Hg showing potential risk. Therefore, PC1 can be regarded as an “anthropogenic factor” mainly related to the discharge of industrial and agricultural wastewater and untreated urban sewage. Anthropogenic sources of heavy metals have been demonstrated in many estuaries worldwide (Diop et al. 2015; Jayaprakash et al. 2014; Pérez-López et al. 2011). In the PRE sediments, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn were significantly derived from anthropogenic sources (Li et al. 2001; Li et al. 2000b; Taylor and McLennan 1995; Zhou et al. 2004). This element group portrayed the anthropogenic input and accumulation in the estuarine sediments. According to studies on the chemical phase of metals in estuarine sediments, Fe/Mn oxides and organic/sulfide fractions are important geochemical phases for heavy metals in sediments, except for the dominant residual fraction (e.g., Cr, Hg, and Zn are mainly associated with the Fe-Mn oxide fraction; Cu and Pb are associated with the organic fraction) (Li et al. 2000a; Li et al. 2000b; Liu et al. 2003). In this study, Fe, Mn, and Corg showed high correlation with other elements in this group (Table (Table3),3), suggesting that heavy metals retained in the sediments bound preferentially to the Fe-Mn oxide fraction or organic matter.

The second principal component (PC2, 21.41% of total variance) had strong loadings on K2O and Al2O3 and moderate loadings for Corg, Fe2O3, clay, Pb, Cr, Zn, and Cu. Both Al and K are major constituents of common silicate minerals. Aluminum is extremely immobile in the marine environment and is usually held in a lattice of aluminosilicate minerals and regarded as a typical lithogenic element (Price et al. 1999). Therefore, Al and K2O mainly represent lithogenic origin from weathering and erosion of rocks and soil parent materials in the Pearl River catchment. Correspondingly, terrigenous sources of Al and K have also been observed in previous studies (Peng et al. 2003; Qi et al. 2010). In addition, the lithogenic elements (Al and K) are proportional to most anthropogenic elements, as expressed by their positive correlations in this study (Table (Table3).3). Moreover, PCA showed that Pb, Cr, Zn, Cu, Fe, and Corg had moderate loadings on PC2, indicating that these elements were derived, at least partially, from lithogenic sources bound in aluminosilicate minerals. Fine clay particles are an important carrier of trace metals to the coastal area (Ip et al. 2007; Yu et al. 2008).

The third principal component (PC3, 13.66% of total variance) demonstrated strong positive loadings for CaO and Sr, weak positive loading for Al and negative loading for K. Both Ca and Sr are essential components of marine biota and play an important role in the marine biogeochemical cycle. Furthermore, CaO and Sr are related to marine sedimentation processes and mainly originate from marine calcic biota (Barcellos et al. 1997; Rubio et al. 2000). The correlation coefficient between CaO and Sr reached 0.854 (Table (Table3),3), indicating that CaO and Sr probably originated from the same source. Similar findings in the PRE have been reported in other research (Zhou et al. 2004). Therefore, PC3 was characterized by a marine component.


This study demonstrated that surface sediments in the study area were dominated by silt and sandy silt, indicating strong hydrodynamic conditions. The spatial distribution patterns of heavy metal concentrations were closely related to sediment type. Overall, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb, and Zn in these sediments met the primary standard criteria of China (CSBTS 2002), though As and Cu did not. The heavy metal concentrations increased within the compositional range of other intertidal sediments in China. Both EF and Igeo showed slight to moderate Cd contamination in the PRE. Cd pollution, which was the most significant in the PRE, had negative loadings with PC2 and PC3, suggesting that Cd could be from anthropogenic sources. Both As and Hg appeared to mainly originate from human activity, whereas Pb, Cr, Cu, and Zn were supplied from both natural and anthropogenic sources.


This study was jointly funded by the Natural Science Foundations of China (Grant No. 41406082, 40872167, 41240022), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. ZR2014DQ010), and Governmental Public Research Funds of China (Nos.PSGD20731059C01B09, 201111023, GZH201200503, and 121201005000150004). This manuscript benefitted from the constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers.


  • Appleby PG, Oldfield F. Application of lead-210 to sedimentation studies. In: Ivanovich M, Harmon RS, editors. Uranium-series disequilibrium applications to Earth. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1992. pp. 731–783.
  • Barcellos C, De Lacerda L, Ceradini S. Sediment origin and budget in Sepetiba Bay (Brazil)—an approach based on multielemental analysis. Environ Geol. 1997;32:203–209. doi: 10.1007/s002540050208. [Cross Ref]
  • Bastami KD, Bagheri H, Haghparast S, Soltani F, Hamzehpoor A, Bastami MD. Geochemical and geo-statistical assessment of selected heavy metals in the surface sediments of the Gorgan Bay, Iran. Mar Pollut Bull. 2012;64:2877–2884. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.08.015. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chen B, Liang X, Xu W, Huang X, Li X. The changes in trace metal contamination over the last decade in surface sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, South China. Sci Total Environ. 2012;439:141–149. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.09.025. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chen Y, Luo Z. Modern sedimentary velocity and their reflected sedimentary characteristics in the Pearl River mouth. Trop Oceanol. 1991;10:57–64.
  • Chen Y. Modern sedimentary velocity and sedimentary environment in the Pearl River mouth. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium University Sunyatseni. 1992;31:100–107.
  • Christophoridis C, Dedepsidis D, Fytianos K. Occurrence and distribution of selected heavy metals in the surface sediments of Thermaikos Gulf, N. Greece. Assessment using pollution indicators. J Hazard Mater. 2009;168:1082–1091. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.154. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • CSBTS . Marine sediment quality. Beijing: Standards Press of China; 2002.
  • Din ZB. Use of aluminium to normalize heavy-metal data from estuarine and coastal sediments of straits of Melaka. Mar Pollut Bull. 1992;24:484–491. doi: 10.1016/0025-326X(92)90472-I. [Cross Ref]
  • Diop C, Dewaelé D, Cazier F, Diouf A, Ouddane B. Assessment of trace metals contamination level, bioavailability and toxicity in sediments from Dakar coast and Saint Louis estuary in Senegal, West Africa. Chemosphere. 2015;138:980–987. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.041. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dou Y, Li J, Zhao J, Hu B, Yang S. Distribution, enrichment and source of heavy metals in surface sediments of the eastern Beibu Bay, South China Sea. Mar Pollut Bull. 2013;67:137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.11.022. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Editorial Board of Chinese standards (1998) National Standards of the People's Republic of China, National Standards Press
  • Folk RL, Ward WC (1957) Brazos River bar: a study in the significance of grain size parameters. J Sediment Res 27
  • Gao X, Arthur Chen C-T, Wang G, Xue Q, Tang C, Chen S. Environmental status of Daya Bay surface sediments inferred from a sequential extraction technique. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2010;86:369–378. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.10.012. [Cross Ref]
  • Han YM, Du PX, Cao JJ, Posmentier ES. Multivariate analysis of heavy metal contamination in urban dusts of Xi’an, Central China. Sci Total Environ. 2006;355:176–186. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.02.026. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Heise B, Bobertz B, Harff J (2010) Classification of the Pearl River estuary via principal component analysis and regionalisation. J Coastal Res 769–779
  • Hu B, Cui R, Li J, Wei H, Zhao J, Bai F, Song W, Ding X. Occurrence and distribution of heavy metals in surface sediments of the Changhua River estuary and adjacent shelf (Hainan Island) Mar Pollut Bull. 2013;76:400–405. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.08.020. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hu B, Li G, Li J, Bi J, Zhao J, Bu R. Spatial distribution and ecotoxicological risk assessment of heavy metals in surface sediments of the southern Bohai Bay, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2013;20:4099–4110. doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-1332-z. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hu B, Li J, Zhao J, Yang J, Bai F, Dou Y (2013c) Heavy metal in surface sediments of the Liaodong Bay, Bohai Sea: distribution, contamination, and sources. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185:5071–5083 [PubMed]
  • Ip C, Li X, Zhang G, Farmer J, Wai O, Li Y. Over one hundred years of trace metal fluxes in the sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, South China. Environ Pollut. 2004;132:157–172. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.03.028. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ip CC, Li X-D, Zhang G, Wai OW, Li Y-S. Trace metal distribution in sediments of the Pearl River Estuary and the surrounding coastal area, South China. Environ Pollut. 2007;147:311–323. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.06.028. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jayaprakash M, Viswam A, Gopal V, Muthuswamy S, Kalaivanan P, Giridharan L, Jonathan M. Bioavailable trace metals in micro-tidal Thambraparani estuary, Gulf of Mannar, SE coast of India. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2014;146:42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2014.05.009. [Cross Ref]
  • Jia Z, Zhao Z, Yang X, Liu J, Chen Z. Pollution and assessment of heavy metals in Yangchong River, Maozhou River and Dongbao River sediments, Shenzhen. Environ Chem. 2001;20:212–219.
  • Li B, Huang GQ (2008) Ecology effect and countermeasure of urbanization in Pearl River Estuary. Mar Environ Sci 27
  • Li G, Cao Z, Lan D, Xu J, Wang S, Yin W. Spatial variations in grain size distribution and selected metal contents in the Xiamen Bay, China. Environ Geol. 2007;52:1559–1567. doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0600-y. [Cross Ref]
  • Li G, Hu B, Bi J, Leng Q, Xiao C, Yang Z. Heavy metals distribution and contamination in surface sediments of the coastal Shandong Peninsula (Yellow Sea) Mar Pollut Bull. 2013;76:420–426. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.08.032. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Li X, Shen Z, Wai OW, Li Y-s. Chemical partitioning of heavy metal contaminants in sediments of the Pearl River Estuary. Chemical Speciation & Bioavailability. 2000;12:17–25. doi: 10.3184/095422900782775607. [Cross Ref]
  • Li X, Wai OW, Li Y, Coles BJ, Ramsey MH, Thornton I. Heavy metal distribution in sediment profiles of the Pearl River estuary, South China. Appl Geochem. 2000;15:567–581. doi: 10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00072-4. [Cross Ref]
  • Li X, Shen Z, Wai OW, Li Y-S. Chemical forms of Pb, Zn and Cu in the sediment profiles of the Pearl River Estuary. Mar Pollut Bull. 2001;42:215–223. doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00145-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Li X, Lee S-l, Wong S-c, Shi W, Thornton I. The study of metal contamination in urban soils of Hong Kong using a GIS-based approach. Environ Pollut. 2004;129:113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.09.030. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Liu W, Li X, Shen Z, Wang D, Wai O, Li Y. Multivariate statistical study of heavy metal enrichment in sediments of the Pearl River Estuary. Environ Pollut. 2003;121:377–388. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00234-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lu X, Zhang S, Xie S, Ma P. Rapid channel incision of the lower Pearl River (China) since the 1990s as a consequence of sediment depletion. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss. 2007;11:1897–1906. doi: 10.5194/hess-11-1897-2007. [Cross Ref]
  • Müller G (1979): Heavy metals in the surfaces sediment of the Rhine-Changes seitt. 1971. Umschan 79:778–783
  • Müller G. Die Schwermetallbelastung der sediments des Neckars und seiner Nebenflusse: eine Bestandsaufnahme. Chemiker-Zeitung. 1981;05:157–164.
  • Pérez-López R, Nieto JM, López-Cascajosa MJ, Díaz-Blanco MJ, Sarmiento AM, Oliveira V, Sánchez-Rodas D. Evaluation of heavy metals and arsenic speciation discharged by the industrial activity on the Tinto-Odiel estuary, SW Spain. Mar Pollut Bull. 2011;62:405–411. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.12.013. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Peng X, Zhou H, Weng H, Pan J, Chen G (2003) Characteristics of major elements’ constitutions and distributions in sediments of the Lingdingyang in the Pearl River Estuary and their geochemical implication. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition)/Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Lixue Ban) 30, 697–702
  • Price N, Brand T, Pates JM, Mowbray S, Theocharis A, Civitarese G, Miserocchi S, Heussner S, Lindsay F. Horizontal distributions of biogenic and lithogenic elements of suspended particulate matter in the Mediterranean Sea. Prog Oceanogr. 1999;44:191–218. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6611(99)00025-7. [Cross Ref]
  • Qi S, Leipe T, Rueckert P, Di Z, Harff J. Geochemical sources, deposition and enrichment of heavy metals in short sediment cores from the Pearl River Estuary, Southern China. J Mar Syst. 2010;82:S28–S42. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2010.02.003. [Cross Ref]
  • Qian J, Shan X-q, Wang Z-j, Tu Q. Distribution and plant availability of heavy metals in different particle-size fractions of soil. Sci Total Environ. 1996;187:131–141. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(96)05134-0. [Cross Ref]
  • Raghunath R, Tripathi R, Kumar AV, Sathe A, Khandekar R, Nambi K. Assessment of Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn exposures of 6-to 10-year-old children in Mumbai. Environ Res. 1999;80:215–221. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3919. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rubio B, Nombela M, Vilas F. Geochemistry of major and trace elements in sediments of the Ria de Vigo (NW Spain): an assessment of metal pollution. Mar Pollut Bull. 2000;40:968–980. doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00039-4. [Cross Ref]
  • Rudnick R, Gao S. Composition of the continental crust. Treatise on Geochemistry. 2003;3:1–64. doi: 10.1016/B0-08-043751-6/03016-4. [Cross Ref]
  • San Miguel E, Bolí J, Garcí R. Vertical distribution of Th-isotope ratios, 210 Pb, 226 Ra and 137 Cs in sediment cores from an estuary affected by anthropogenic releases. Sci Total Environ. 2004;318:143–157. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00367-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Schropp SJ, Lewis FG, Windom HL, Ryan JD, Calder FD, Burney LC. Interpretation of metal concentrations in estuarine sediments of Florida using aluminum as a reference element. Estuaries. 1990;13:227–235. doi: 10.2307/1351913. [Cross Ref]
  • Shi Y, Liang K, Xia Z (2006) Pollution of heavy metals in the Lingdingyang of Pearl river estuary and its assessment of potential ecological risk. Gresearch of Eological South China Sea, 52–59
  • Siddique A, Mumtaz M, Zaigham NA, Mallick KA, Saied S, Zahir E, Khwaja HA. Heavy metal toxicity levels in the coastal sediments of the Arabian Sea along the urban Karachi (Pakistan) region. Mar Pollut Bull. 2009;58:1406–1414. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.06.010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Taylor S. Abundance of chemical elements in the continental crust: a new table. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1964;28:1273–1285. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(64)90129-2. [Cross Ref]
  • Taylor SR, McLennan SM. The geochemical evolution of the continental crust. Rev Geophys. 1995;33:241–265. doi: 10.1029/95RG00262. [Cross Ref]
  • Turekian KK, Wedepohl KH. Distribution of the elements in some major units of the earth’s crust. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1961;72:175–192. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1961)72[175:DOTEIS]2.0.CO;2. [Cross Ref]
  • Varol M. Assessment of heavy metal contamination in sediments of the Tigris River (Turkey) using pollution indices and multivariate statistical techniques. J Hazard Mater. 2011;195:355–364. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.051. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Venkatramanan S, Chung S-y, Ramkumar T, Gnanachandrasamy G, Kim TH. Evaluation of geochemical behavior and heavy metal distribution of sediments: the case study of the Tirumalairajan river estuary, southeast coast of India. International Journal of Sediment Research. 2015;30:28–38. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6279(15)60003-8. [Cross Ref]
  • Wang F, Wang W-X, Huang X-P. Spatial distribution of gut juice extractable Cu, Pb and Zn in sediments from the Pearl River Estuary, Southern China. Mar Environ Res. 2012;77:112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.03.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang H, Wang J, Liu R, Yu W, Shen Z. Spatial variation, environmental risk and biological hazard assessment of heavy metals in surface sediments of the Yangtze River estuary. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015;93:250–258. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.01.026. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang J, Huang C, Ni Z, Jin G, Cao L, Chen H, Waxi L. Analysis on distribution, speciation and source of heavy metals in superficial sediments in the Pearl River Estuary. Mar Sci Bull. 2014;33:259–267.
  • Wang J, Liu R, Zhang P, Yu W, Shen Z, Feng C. Spatial variation, environmental assessment and source identification of heavy metals in sediments of the Yangtze River Estuary. Mar Pollut Bull. 2014;87:364–373. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.07.048. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Woods AM, Lloyd JM, Zong Y, Brodie CR. Spatial mapping of Pearl River Estuary surface sediment geochemistry: influence of data analysis on environmental interpretation. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2012;115:218–233. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2012.09.005. [Cross Ref]
  • Xia N, Zhang Q, Yao D, Li G. Geochemical analysis of marine sediments using fused glass disc by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Chin J Oceanol Limnol. 2008;26:475–479. doi: 10.1007/s00343-008-0475-8. [Cross Ref]
  • Xia P, Meng X, Yin P, Cao Z, Wang X. Eighty-year sedimentary record of heavy metal inputs in the intertidal sediments from the Nanliu River estuary, Beibu Gulf of South China Sea. Environ Pollut. 2011;159:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.09.014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Xia Z. Characters of underwater topography and geomorphology in inner Lingdingyang firth of the Pearl River (Zhuanghai River) estuary. Marine Geology and Quaternary Geology. 2005;25:20–24.
  • Xu G, Liu J, Pei S, Gao M, Hu G, Kong X. Sediment properties and trace metal pollution assessment in surface sediments of the Laizhou Bay, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:11634–11647. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4393-y. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Xu G, Liu J, Pei S, Hu G, Kong X. Geochemical background and ecological risk of heavy metals in surface sediments from the west Zhoushan Fishing Ground of East China Sea. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:20283–20294. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5662-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Xu G, Pei S, Liu J, Gao M, Hu G, Kong X (2015c) Surface sediment properties and heavy metal pollution assessment in the near-shore area, north Shandong Peninsula. Mar Pollut Bull 95:395–401 [PubMed]
  • Xu Y, Sun Q, Yi L, Yin X, Wang A, Li Y, Chen J. The source of natural and anthropogenic heavy metals in the sediments of the Minjiang River Estuary (SE China): implications for historical pollution. Sci Total Environ. 2014;493:729–736. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.046. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yang X, Yuan X, Zhang A, Mao Y, Li Q, Zong H, Wang L, Li X. Spatial distribution and sources of heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbon in the sand flats of Shuangtaizi Estuary, Bohai Sea of China. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015;95:503–512. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.02.042. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yang Y, Chen F, Zhang L, Liu J, Wu S, Kang M. Comprehensive assessment of heavy metal contamination in sediment of the Pearl River Estuary and adjacent shelf. Mar Pollut Bull. 2012;64:1947–1955. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.04.024. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ye F, Huang X, Zhang D, Tian L, Zeng Y. Distribution of heavy metals in sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, Southern China: implications for sources and historical changes. J Environ Sci. 2012;24:579–588. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60783-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yu RL, Yuan X, Zhao YH, Hu GR, Tu XL. Heavy metal pollution in intertidal sediments from Quanzhou Bay, China. J Environ Sci. 2008;20:664–669. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62110-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yu X, Yan Y, Wang W-X. The distribution and speciation of trace metals in surface sediments from the Pearl River Estuary and the Daya Bay, Southern China. Mar Pollut Bull. 2010;60:1364–1371. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.05.012. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang J, Liu C. Riverine composition and estuarine geochemistry of particulate metals in China—weathering features, anthropogenic impact and chemical fluxes. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2002;54:1051–1070. doi: 10.1006/ecss.2001.0879. [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang L, Shi Z, Jiang Z, Zhang J, Wang F, Huang X (2015a) Distribution and bioaccumulation of heavy metals in marine organisms in east and west Guangdong coastal regions, South China. Mar Pollut Bull [PubMed]
  • Zhang L, Shi Z, Zhang J, Jiang Z, Wang F, Huang X (2015b) Spatial and seasonal characteristics of dissolved heavy metals in the east and west Guangdong coastal waters, South China. Mar Pollut Bull [PubMed]
  • Zhang SR, Lu XX, Higgitt DL, Chen CTA, Sun HG, Han JT (2007) Water chemistry of the Zhujiang (Pearl River): natural processes and anthropogenic influences. J Geophys Res: Earth Surf 112
  • Zhang W, Feng H, Chang J, Qu J, Xie H, Yu L. Heavy metal contamination in surface sediments of Yangtze River intertidal zone: an assessment from different indexes. Environ Pollut. 2009;157:1533–1543. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.01.007. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang W, Jin H, Zhang F, Zhao G, Yang K, Li H, Bai Y, Gao W. Organic carbon distribution in the Yangtze River estuary-Hangzhou Bay and its adjacent sea area. Advances in Earth Science. 2009;24:1202–1209.
  • Zhang YH, Du JM. Background values of pollutants in sediments of the South China Sea. Acta Oceanol Sin. 2005;27:161–166.
  • Zhou G, Sun B, Zeng D, Wei H, Liu Z, Zhang B. Vertical distribution of trace elements in the sediment cores from major rivers in East China and its implication on geochemical background and anthropogenic effects. J Geochem Explor. 2014;139:53–67. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.03.007. [Cross Ref]
  • Zhou H-y, Peng X-t, Pan J-m. Distribution, source and enrichment of some chemical elements in sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, China. Cont Shelf Res. 2004;24:1857–1875. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2004.06.012. [Cross Ref]
  • Zhu L, Xu J, Wang F, Lee B (2011): An assessment of selected heavy metal contamination in the surface sediments from the South China Sea before 1998. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 108:1–14

Articles from Springer Open Choice are provided here courtesy of Springer