PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of ploscompComputational BiologyView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 February; 13(2): e1005404.
Published online 2017 February 21. doi:  10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005404
PMCID: PMC5340466

Metacoder: An R package for visualization and manipulation of community taxonomic diversity data

Timothée Poisot, Editor

Abstract

Community-level data, the type generated by an increasing number of metabarcoding studies, is often graphed as stacked bar charts or pie graphs that use color to represent taxa. These graph types do not convey the hierarchical structure of taxonomic classifications and are limited by the use of color for categories. As an alternative, we developed metacoder, an R package for easily parsing, manipulating, and graphing publication-ready plots of hierarchical data. Metacoder includes a dynamic and flexible function that can parse most text-based formats that contain taxonomic classifications, taxon names, taxon identifiers, or sequence identifiers. Metacoder can then subset, sample, and order this parsed data using a set of intuitive functions that take into account the hierarchical nature of the data. Finally, an extremely flexible plotting function enables quantitative representation of up to 4 arbitrary statistics simultaneously in a tree format by mapping statistics to the color and size of tree nodes and edges. Metacoder also allows exploration of barcode primer bias by integrating functions to run digital PCR. Although it has been designed for data from metabarcoding research, metacoder can easily be applied to any data that has a hierarchical component such as gene ontology or geographic location data. Our package complements currently available tools for community analysis and is provided open source with an extensive online user manual.

This is a PLOS Computational Biology software paper

Introduction

Metabarcoding is revolutionizing our understanding of complex ecosystems by circumventing the traditional limits of microbial diversity assessment, which include the need and bias of culturability, the effects of cryptic diversity, and the reliance on expert identification. Metabarcoding is a technique for determining community composition that typically involves extracting environmental DNA, amplifying a gene shared by a taxonomic group of interest using PCR, sequencing the amplicons, and comparing the sequences to reference databases [1]. It has been used extensively to explore communities inhabiting diverse environments, including oceans [2], plants [3], animals [4], humans [5], and soil [6].

The complex community data produced by metabarcoding is challenging conventional graphing techniques. Most often, bar charts, stacked bar charts, or pie graphs are employed that use color to represent a small number of taxa at the same rank (e.g. phylum, class, etc). This reliance on color for categorical information limits the number of taxa that can be effectively displayed, so most published figures only show results at a coarse taxonomic rank (e.g. class) or for only the most abundant taxa. These graphing techniques do not convey the hierarchical nature of taxonomic classifications, potentially obscuring patterns in unexplored taxonomic ranks that might be more biologically important. More recently, tree-based visualizations are becoming available as exemplified by the python-based MetaPhlAn and the corresponding graphing software GraPhlAn [7]. This tool allows visualization of high-quality circular representations of taxonomic trees.

Here, we introduce the R package metacoder that is specifically designed to address some of these problems in metabarcoding-based community ecology, focusing on parsing and manipulation of hierarchical data and community visualization in R. Metacoder provides a visualization that we call “heat trees” which quantitatively depicts statistics associated with taxa, such as abundance, using the color and size of nodes and edges in a taxonomic tree. These heat trees are useful for evaluating taxonomic coverage, barcode bias, or displaying differences in taxon abundance between communities. To import and manipulate data, metacoder provides a means of extracting and parsing taxonomic information from text-based formats (e.g. reference database FASTA headers) and an intuitive set of functions for subsetting, sampling, and rearranging taxonomic data. Metacoder also allows exploration of barcode primer bias by integrating digital PCR, which simulates PCR success using alignments between reference sequences and primers. All this functionality is made intuitive and user-friendly while still allowing extensive customization and flexibility. Metacoder can be applied to any data that can be organized hierarchically such as gene ontology or geographic location. Metacoder is an open source project available on CRAN and is provided with comprehensive online documentation including examples.

Design and implementation

The R package metacoder provides a set of novel tools designed to parse, manipulate, and visualize community diversity data in a tree format using any taxonomic classification (Fig 1). Fig 1 illustrates the ease of use and flexibility of metacoder. It shows an example analysis extracting taxonomy from the 16S Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) training set for mothur [8], filtering and sampling the data by both taxon and sequence characteristics, running digital PCR, and graphing the proportion of sequences amplified for each taxon. Table 1 provides an overview of the core functions available in metacoder.

Fig 1
Metacoder has an intuitive and easy to use syntax.
Table 1
Primary functions found in metacoder.

The taxmap data object

To store the taxonomic hierarchy and associated observations (e.g. sequences) we developed a new data object class called taxmap. The taxmap class is designed to be as flexible and easily manipulated as possible. The only assumption made about the user’s data is that it can be represented as a set of observations assigned to a hierarchy; the hierarchy and the observations do not need to be biological. The class contains two tables in which user data is stored: a taxonomic hierarchy stored as an edge list of unique IDs and a set of observations mapped to that hierarchy (Fig 1). Users can add, remove, or reorder both columns and rows in either taxmap table using convenient functions included in the package (Table 1). For each table, there is also a list of included functions that create a temporary column with the same name when referenced by one of the manipulation or plotting functions. These are useful for attributes that must be updated when the data is subset or otherwise modified, such as the number of observations for each taxon (see “n_obs” in Fig 1). If this kind of derived information was stored in a static column, the user would have to update the column each time the data set is subset, potentially leading to mistakes if this is not done. There are many of these column-generating functions included by default, but the user can easily add their own by adding a function that takes a taxmap object. The names of columns or column-generating functions in either table of a taxmap object can be referenced as if they were independent variables in most metacoder functions in the style of popular R packages like ggplot2 and dplyr. This makes the code much easier to read and write.

Universal parsing and retrieval of taxonomic information

Metacoder provides a way to extract taxonomic information from text-based formats so it can be manipulated within R. One of the most inefficient steps in bioinformatics can be loading and parsing data into a standardized form that is usable for computational analysis. Many databases have unique taxonomy formats with differing types of taxonomic information. The taxonomic structure and nomenclature used can be unique to the database or reference another database such as GenBank [10]. Rather than creating a parser for each data format, metacoder provides a single function to parse any format definable by regular expressions that contains taxonomic information (Fig 1). This makes it easier to use multiple data sources with the same downstream analysis.

The extract_taxonomy function can parse hierarchical classifications or retrieve classifications from online databases using taxon names, taxon IDs, or Genbank sequence IDs. The user supplies a regular expression with capture groups (parentheses) and a corresponding key to define what parts of the input can provide classification information. The extract_taxonomy function has been used successfully to parse several major database formats including Genbank [10], UNITE [11], Protist Ribosomal Reference Database (PR2) [12], Greengenes [13], Silva [14], and, as illustrated in Fig 1, the RDP [9]. Examples for each database are provided in the user manuals [15].

Intuitive manipulation of taxonomic data

Metacoder makes it easy to subset and sample large data sets composed of thousands of observations (e.g. sequences) assigned to thousands of taxa, while taking into account hierarchical relationships. This allows for exploration and analysis of manageable subsets of a large data set. Taxonomies are inherently hierarchical, making them difficult to subset and sample intuitively compared with typical tabular data. In addition to the taxonomy itself, there is usually also data assigned to taxa in the taxonomy, which we refer to as “observations”. Subsetting either the taxonomy or the associated observations, depending on the goal, might require subsetting both to keep them in sync. For example, if a set of taxa are removed or left out of a random subsample, should the subtaxa and associated observations also be removed, left as is, or reassigned to a supertaxon? If observations are removed, should the taxa they were assigned to also be removed? The functions provided by metacoder gives the user control over these details and simplifies their implementation.

Metacoder allows users to intuitively and efficiently subset complex hierarchical data sets using a cohesive set of functions inspired by the popular dplyr data-manipulation philosophy. Dplyr is an R package for providing a conceptually consistent set of operations for manipulating tabular information [16]. Whereas dplyr functions each act on a single table, metacoder’s analogous functions act on both the taxon and observation tables in a taxmap object (Table 1). For each major dplyr function there are two analogous metacoder functions: one that manipulates the taxon table and one that manipulates the observations table. The functions take into account the relationship between the two tables and can modify both depending on parameterization, allowing for operations on taxa to affect their corresponding observations and vice versa. They also take into account the hierarchical nature of the taxon table. For example, the metacoder functions filter_taxa and filter_obs are based on the dplyr function filter and are used to remove rows in the taxon and observation tables corresponding to some criterion. Unlike simply applying a filter to these tables directly, these functions allow the subtaxa, supertaxa, and/or observations of taxa passing the filter to be preserved or discarded, making it easy to subset the data in diverse ways (Fig 1). There are also functions for ordering rows (arrange_taxa, arrange_obs), subsetting columns (select_taxa, select_obs), and adding columns (mutate_taxa, mutate_obs).

Metacoder also provides functions for random sampling of taxa and corresponding observations. The function taxonomic_sample is used to randomly sub-sample items such that all taxa of one or more given ranks have some specified number of observations representing them. Taxa with too few sequences are excluded and taxa with too many are randomly subsampled. Whole taxa can also be sampled based on the number of sub-taxa they have. Alternatively, there are dplyr analogues called sample_n_taxa and sample_n_obs, which can sample some number of taxa or observations. In both functions, weights can be assigned to taxa or observations, influencing how likely each is to be sampled. For example, the probability of sampling a given observation can be determined by a taxon characteristic, such as the number of observations assigned to that taxon, or it could be determined by an observation characteristic, like sequence length. Similar to the filter_* functions, there are parameters controlling whether selected taxa’s subtaxa, supertaxa, or observations are included or not in the sample (Fig 1).

Heat tree plotting of taxonomic data

Visualizing the massive data sets being generated by modern sequencing of complex ecosystems is typically done using traditional stacked barcharts or pie graphs, but these ignore the hierarchical nature of taxonomic classifications and their reliance on colors for categories limits the number of taxa that can be distinguished (Fig 2). Generic trees can convey a taxonomic hierarchy, but displaying how statistics are distributed throughout the tree, including internal taxa, is difficult. Metacoder provides a function that plots up to 4 statistics on a tree with quantitative legends by automatically mapping any set of numbers to the color and width of nodes and edges. The size and content of edge and node labels can also be mapped to custom values. These publication-quality graphs provide a method for visualizing community data that is richer than is currently possible with stacked bar charts. Although there are other R packages that can plot variables on trees, like phyloseq [17], these have been designed for phylogenetic rather than taxonomic trees and are therefore optimized for plotting information on the tips of the tree and not on internal nodes. There is also a set of python scripts called GraPhlAn that can make similar tree-based visualizations. GraPhlAn has better annotation abilities than metacoder, supports edge length for phylogenetic trees, and can plot a variety of node shapes. However, metacoder’s heat tree function can plot multiple trees per graph, use different layout algorithms, automatically transform raw data to color/size for quantitative display with a scale bar, and optimize the size range of nodes to avoid crowded or sparse graphs.

Fig 2
Heat trees allow for a better understanding of community structure than stacked bar charts.

The function heat_tree creates a tree utilizing color and size to display taxon statistics (e.g., sequence abundance) for many taxa and ranks in one intuitive graph (Fig 2). Taxa are represented as nodes and both color and size are used to represent any statistic associated with taxa, such as abundance. Although the heat_tree function has many options to customize the appearance of the graph, it is designed to minimize the amount of user-defined parameters necessary to create an effective visualization. The size range of graph elements is optimized for each graph to minimize overlap and maximize size range. Raw statistics are automatically translated to size and color and a legend is added to display the relationship. Unlike most other plotting functions in R, the plot looks the same regardless of output size, allowing the graph to be saved at any size or used in complex, composite figures without changing parameters. These characteristics allow heat_tree to be used effectively in pipelines and with minimal parameterization since a small set of parameters displays diverse taxonomy data. The output of the heat_tree function is a ggplot2 object, making it compatible with many existing R tools. Another novel feature of heat trees is the automatic plotting of multiple trees when there are multiple “roots” to the hierarchy. This can happen when, for example, there are “Bacteria” and “Eukaryota” taxa without a unifying “Life” taxon, or when coarse taxonomic ranks are removed to aid in the visualization of large data sets (Fig 3).

Fig 3
Heat trees display up to four metrics in a taxonomic context and can plot multiple trees per graph.

Results

Heat trees allow quantitative visualization of community diversity data

We developed heat trees to allow visualization of community data in a taxonomic context by mapping any statistic to the color or size of tree components. Here, we reanalyzed data set 5 from the TARA oceans eukaryotic plankton diversity study to visualize the similarity between OTUs observed in the data set and their closest match to a sequence in a reference database [2]. The TARA ocean expedition analyzed DNA extracted from ocean water throughout the world. Even though a custom reference database was made using curated 18S sequences spanning all known eukaryotic diversity, many of the OTUs observed had no close match. Fig 3 shows a heat tree that illustrates the proportion of OTUs that were well characterized in each taxon (at least 90% identical to a reference sequence). Color indicates the percentage of OTUs that are well characterized, node width indicates the number of OTUs assigned to each taxon, and edge width indicates the number of reads. Taxa with ambiguous names and those with less than 300 reads have been filtered out for clarity. This figure illustrates one of the principal advantages of heat trees, as it reveals many clades in the tree that contain only purple and orange lineages, which indicate that the entire taxonomic group is poorly represented in the reference sequence database. Of particular interest are those clades with predominantly purple and orange lineages that also have relatively large nodes, such as Harpacticoida (in Copepoda on the left). These represent taxonomic groups that were found to have high amounts of diversity in the oceans, but for which we have a paucity of genomic information. Investigators interested in improving the genomic resolution of the biosphere can thus use these approaches to rapidly assess which taxa should be prioritized for focused investigations.

Flexible parsing allows for similar use of diverse data

Metabarcoding studies often rely on techniques or data that may introduce bias into an investigation. For example, the specific set of PCR primers used to amplify genomic DNA and the taxonomic annotation database can both have an effect on the study results. A quick and inexpensive way to estimate biases caused by primers is to use digital PCR. Metacoder can be used to explore different databases or primer combinations to assess these effects since it supplies functions to parse divserse data sources, conduct digital PCR, and plot the results. Fig 4 shows a series of heat tree comparisons that were produced using a common 16S rRNA metabarcoding primer set and digital PCR against the full-length 16S sequences found in three taxonomic annotation databases: Greengenes [13], RDP [9], and SILVA [14]. These heat trees reveal subsets of the full taxonomies for these three databases that poorly amplify by digital PCR using the selected primers. As a result, they indicate which lineages within each of the taxonomies may be challenging to detect in a metabarcoding study that uses these primers. Importantly, different sets of primers likely amplify different sets of taxa, so investigators interested in specific lineages can use this approach in conjunction with various primer sets to identify those that maximize the likelihood of discovery and reduce wasted sequencing resources on non-target organisms. However, these heat trees do not indicate whether one database is necessarily preferable over another, as they differ in the structure of their taxonomies, as well as the number and phylogenetic diversity of their reference sequences. For example, most of the bacterial clades that do not amplify well in the SILVA lineages are unnamed lineages that are not found in the other databases, indicating that they warrant further exploration.

Fig 4
Flexible parsing and digital PCR allows for comparisons of primers and databases.

Heat trees can show pairwise comparisons of communities across treatments

One challenge in metabarcoding studies is visually determining how specific sub-sets of samples vary in their taxonomic composition. Unlike most other graphing software in R, metacoder produces graphs that look the same at any output size or aspect ratio, allowing heat trees to be easily integrated into larger composite figures without changing the code for individual subplots. Using color to depict the difference in read or OTU abundance between two treatments can result in particularly effective visualizations, especially when the presence of color is made dependent on a statistical test. To examine more than two treatments at once, a matrix of these kind of heat trees can be combined with a labeled “guide” tree. Fig 5 shows application of this idea to human microbiome data showing pairwise differences between body sites. Coloring indicates significant differences between the median proportion of reads for samples from different body sites as determined using a Wilcox rank-sum test followed by a Benjamini-Hochberg (FDR) correction for multiple testing. The intensity of the color is relative to the log-2 ratio of difference in median proportions. Brown taxa indicate an enrichment in body sites listed on the top of the graph and green is the opposite. While the original study [5] showed abundance plots, our visualization provides the taxonomic context. For example, Haemophilus, Streptococcus, and Prevotella spp. are enriched in saliva (brown) relative to stool where Bacteroides is enriched (green). We also see that in the Lachnospiraceae clade several genera shown in both green and brown taxa are differentially abundant. These observations are consistent with known differences in the human-associated microbiome across body sites, but heat trees uniquely provide an integrated view of how all levels of a taxonomy vary for all pairs of body sites.

Fig 5
Scale-independent appearance facilitates complex, composite figures.

Other applications

The taxmap data object defined in metacoder can be used for any data that can be classified by a hierarchy. Fig 6, for example, shows an analysis of votes cast in the 2016 US Democratic party national primaries organized by geography. The heat tree reveals distinct patterns such as a sweep by Clinton in the South and a split on the West coast, with California predominantly voting for Clinton while Washington and Oregon predominantly voted for Sanders. Another potential application is displaying the results of gene expression studies by associating differential expression with gene ontology (GO) annotations. Fig 7 shows the results of a RNA-seq study on the effect of glucocorticoids on smooth muscle tissue [19]. All biological processes influenced by at least one gene with a significant change in expression are plotted. The authors of the study find that genes involved in immune response are influenced by the glucocorticoid treatment. Viewing these results in a heat tree shows not only the specific immune process affected (the branch on the middle right), but also the more general phenomena they constitute; regulation of high level phenomena, like immune system function, can be explained by specific processes like “lymphocyte homeostasis” and these specific processes are put into the context of the phenomena they contribute to. This is more informative than simply reporting the results for a single level of the GO annotation hierarchy or discussing the effects of genes one at a time.

Fig 6
Metacoder can be used with any type of data that can be organized hierarchically.
Fig 7
Another alternate use example: Visualizing gene expression data in a GO hierarchy.

Availability and future directions

The R package metacoder is an open-source project under the MIT License. Stable releases of metacoder are available on CRAN while recent improvements can be downloaded from github (https://github.com/grunwaldlab/metacoder). A manual with documentation and examples is provided [15]. This manual also provides the code to reproduce all figures included in this manuscript.

We are currently continuing development of metacoder. We welcome contributions and feedback from the community. We want to make metacoder functions and classes compatible with those from other bioinformatic R packages such as phyloseq, ape [20], seqinr [21], and taxize [22]. We might integrate more options for digital PCR and barcode gap analysis, perhaps using ecoPCR [23] or the R packages PrimerMiner [24] and Spider [25]. We are also considering adding additional visualization functions.

Funding Statement

This work was supported in part by funds from USDA ARS CRIS Project 2027-22000-039-00 and the USDA ARS Floriculture Nursery Research Initiative 2072-22000-039-15-S to NJG and National Sciences Foundation Award 1557192 to TJS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Data Availability

Data Availability

The R package metacoder is an open-source project under the MIT License. Stable releases of metacoder are available on CRAN while recent improvements can be downloaded from github (https://github.com/grunwaldlab/metacoder). A manual with documentation and examples is provided: Foster ZSL, Grunwald NJ. Metacoder user documentation [Internet]. 2016. doi:10.5281/zenodo.158228. This manual also provides the code to reproduce all figures included in this manuscript.

References

1. Cristescu ME. From barcoding single individuals to metabarcoding biological communities: towards an integrative approach to the study of global biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol. 2014;29(10):566–571. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.08.001 [PubMed]
2. De Vargas C, Audic S, Henry N, Decelle J, Mahé F, Logares R, et al. Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean. Science. 2015;348(6237):1261605 doi: 10.1126/science.1261605 [PubMed]
3. Coleman-Derr D, Desgarennes D, Fonseca-Garcia C, Gross S, Clingenpeel S, Woyke T, et al. Plant compartment and biogeography affect microbiome composition in cultivated and native Agave species. New Phytol. 2016;209(2):798–811. doi: 10.1111/nph.13697 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Yu DW, Ji Y, Emerson BC, Wang X, Ye C, Yang C, et al. Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring. Methods Ecol Evol. 2012;3(4):613–623. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00198.x
5. Consortium HMP, et al. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486(7402):207–214. doi: 10.1038/nature11234 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Gilbert JA, Jansson JK, Knight R. The Earth Microbiome project: successes and aspirations. BMC Biol. 2014;12(1):1 doi: 10.1186/s12915-014-0069-1 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Segata N, Waldron L, Ballarini A, Narasimhan V, Jousson O, Huttenhower C. Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes. Nature Methods. 2012;9(8):811–814. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2066 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(23):7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Maidak BL, Olsen GJ, Larsen N, Overbeek R, McCaughey MJ, Woese CR. The ribosomal database project (RDP). Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24(1):82–85. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.1.82 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(D1):D36–D42. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1195 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Kõljalg U, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K, Tedersoo L, Taylor AF, Bahram M, et al. Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi. Mol Ecol. 2013;22(21):5271–5277. doi: 10.1111/mec.12481 [PubMed]
12. Guillou L, Bachar D, Audic S, Bass D, Berney C, Bittner L, et al. The Protist Ribosomal Reference database (PR2): a catalog of unicellular eukaryote small sub-unit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41:D597–D604. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1160 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environn Microbiol. 2006;72(7):5069–5072. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03006-05 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(D1):D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Foster ZSL, Grünwald NJ. Metacoder user documentation; 2016. Available from: http://grunwaldlab.github.io/metacoder_documentation.
16. Wickham H, Francois R. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation; 2016. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr.
17. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PloS One. 2013;8(4):e61217 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Walters W, Hyde ER, Berg-Lyons D, Ackermann G, Humphrey G, Parada A, et al. Improved Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene (V4 and V4-5) and Fungal Internal Transcribed Spacer Marker Gene Primers for Microbial Community Surveys. mSystems. 2016;1(1):e00009–15. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00009-15 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Himes BE, Jiang X, Wagner P, Hu R, Wang Q, Klanderman B, et al. RNA-Seq transcriptome profiling identifies CRISPLD2 as a glucocorticoid responsive gene that modulates cytokine function in airway smooth muscle cells. PloS One. 2014;9(6):e99625 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099625 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(2):289–290. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 [PubMed]
21. Charif D, Lobry JR. SeqinR 1.0-2: a contributed package to the R project for statistical computing devoted to biological sequences retrieval and analysis In: Structural approaches to sequence evolution. Springer; 2007. p. 207–232.
22. Chamberlain SA, Szöcs E. taxize: taxonomic search and retrieval in R. F1000Research. 2013;2 doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-191.v2 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Ficetola GF, Coissac E, Zundel S, Riaz T, Shehzad W, Bessière J, et al. An in silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes. BMC genomics. 2010;11(1):434 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-434 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Elbrecht V, Leese F. PrimerMiner: an R package for development and in silico validation of DNA metabarcoding primers. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2016;. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12687
25. Brown SD, Collins RA, Boyer S, Lefort MC, Malumbres-Olarte J, Vink CJ, et al. Spider: an R package for the analysis of species identity and evolution, with particular reference to DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2012;12(3):562–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03108.x [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Computational Biology are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science