PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of medicineHomeSearchSubmit a ManuscriptMedicine
 
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 March; 96(9): e6203.
Published online 2017 March 3. doi:  10.1097/MD.0000000000006203
PMCID: PMC5340449

Obturator externus abscess in a 9-year-old child

A case report and literature review
Monitoring Editor: Mohamed Fahmy.

Abstract

Rationale:

Obturator pyomyositis is a rare condition in children. Diagnosis is often delayed because of its rarity, and the vagaries of its presentation cause it to be easily be missed. Physicians should therefore familiarize themselves with this condition and consider it as a possible differential diagnosis in patients presenting with an acutely painful hip. Inflammatory syndrome is also frequent among sufferers and the MRI is a very sensitive diagnostic tool for obturator pyomyositis. Additionally, joint fluid aspirations and blood cultures are also useful in identifying the pathogen. The appropriate antibiotic therapy provides a rapid regression of symptoms during the early stage of pyomyositis. In cases of MRI-confirmed abscess, surgical treatment is indicated.

Patient concerns:

Our report focuses on a case of obturator pyomyositis in a 9-year-old boy. The child was febrile for 5 days and could only manage to walk a few steps. His hip range of motion was restricted in all directions. In addition, the patient had presented pain and swelling of his right elbow for a day, with a restriction of motion in the joint. There was a clear inflammatory syndrome. A diagnosis of hip and elbow septic arthritis was suspected, and the child underwent joint aspiration of the both cited joints. The aspiration of the elbow returned pus. Conversely, no effusion was found in the hip aspiration. The administration of empiric intravenous antibiotherapy was started.

Diagnoses:

An MRI revealed an osteomyelitis of the ischio-pubic area associated with a subperiosteal abscess.

Interventions:

Subsequently, 3 days after elbow arthrotomy, a surgical treatment was performed on the patient's right hip in order to evacuate the subperiosteal abscess and muscular collection because of the persistence of the patient's symptoms and inflammatory syndrome despite susceptible intravenous antibiotics. Postsurgery the patient showed steady improvement.

Lessons:

Such cases demonstrate how diagnosis can be difficult because pelvic pyomyositis is often mistaken for more common pathologies such as septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, or appendicitis. This may delay the diagnosis or refer misdiagnosis. We discuss this rare infection in light of the literature with particular reference to its incidence, clinical features, bacteriological etiology, biological, and radiological presentation, and above all, its treatment.

Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging, obturator externus muscle, pyomyositis

1. Introduction

Pyomyositis is defined as a bacterial infection of the muscle tissue which first leads to localized inflammation, then abscess formation. The infection can affect any skeletal muscle, but most often infects the largest muscle groups such as the quadriceps or gluteal muscles.[13] Pyomyositis of the pelvic musculature is a condition rarely seen in temperate climates. The diagnosis of obturator pyomyositis is often delayed because of its rarity and the vagaries of its clinical presentation. In fact, most children with obturator pyomyositis consult with fever, and either hip, thigh, or even abdominal pain, and often with an associated limp. As a result, pelvic pyomyositis is often mistaken for more common pathologies such as septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, or appendicitis.[4] Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice in the workup of musculoskeletal infections.[57] It has increased sensitivity in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis compared with that of bone scans and plain radiographs, and has the ability to detect pyomyositis.[8] Pyomyositis is most frequently caused by Staphylococcus aureus. We present a rare case of obturator pyomyositis in a child, and our aim is to remind to the general practitioner of the risk of misdiagnosis, and highlight the usefulness of MRI in the diagnosis of osteoarticular infection. We discuss this rare infection in light of the literature with particular reference to its incidence, clinical features, bacteriological etiology, biological, and radiological presentation, and above all, its treatment.

2. Case report

A 9-year-old boy was brought to the emergency department of our hospital because of a 5-day history of fever, vomiting, and right hip pain localized to the anterior and medial aspect of his right hip. He was examined and received a diagnosis of flu and viral gastroenteritis. His right hip pain was attributed to sportive activities without trauma, and the patient was discharged with symptomatic treatment. The family returned to the emergency department twice more in the following 3 days because of his worsening symptoms. Four days after the onset of the fever, a reduction in the range of motion of the child's right elbow appeared, in addition to vomiting and limping.

Upon admittance to our hospital, the child was febrile, and could only manage to walk a few steps without supports, with an important antalgic gait. The spontaneous rest position of his hip was in slight flexion with external rotation. His hip range of motion was restricted in all directions, but predominantly in internal rotation. In addition, the patient presented pain and swelling of his right elbow, with a restriction in motion of the joint.

The patient's laboratory results showed a white blood cell count of 17,100 cells/mm3 with 86% neutrophils, C-reactive protein to 200 mg/L, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate 65 mm/h. A conventional radiograph of the hip and the elbow showed no significant abnormality and a diagnosis of hip and elbow septic arthritis was therefore suspected, and the child underwent aspiration of both the cited joints. Aspiration of the elbow returned 7 mL of pus, and thus drainage and irrigation of the joint were performed using a lateral approach. Conversely, no effusion was found in the hip aspiration. The patient was immediately started on empiric intravenous antibiotics (clavulanic acid/amoxicillin). The following day, an MRI of the hip was performed in order to explain the pain and range of motion restriction of the right hip, which were unusual since the hip aspiration was normal. The MRI revealed an osteomyelitis of the ischio-pubic area associated with a subperiosteal abscess (Fig. (Fig.1).1). A 0.6 × 3 cm low attenuation mass with an enhancing rim within the right obturator externus muscle was also identified (Fig. (Fig.2).2). Scintigraphy was performed to eliminate other septic localizations.

Figure 1

Coronal T2 fat sat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing bone involvement in the pubic area with ischium subperiosteal abscess, and enhancement rim of the externus obturator.

Figure 2

Axial T2 fat sat weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with enhancing rim within externus obturator, internus obturator, and levator ani muscle.

Streptococcus pyogenes (group A) was cultivated from the joint fluid of the elbow, whereas the blood and urine cultures remained negative. Three days after the elbow arthrotomy, a surgical treatment was performed on the patient's right hip in order to evacuate the subperiosteal abscess and muscular collection because of the persistence of the patient's symptoms and inflammatory syndrome despite effective intravenous antibiotics. An incision and drainage was performed through the medial approach. This revealed bloodstained pus of the ischiopubic area. The right elbow was also examined again during this operation. Clavulanic acid/amoxycillin therapy was continued intravenously for a further 2 weeks, then the boy was switched to an oral treatment for 4 additional weeks. The patient showed steady improvement, his temperature returned to normal within 24 hours, along with a gradual improvement of his hip and elbow pain. All the patient's biological parameters returned to normal within a week.

3. Review of the literature

We searched the MEDLINE database, the Cochrane Library, and the Google Scholar search engine without date restrictions for all literature published up to December 31, 2015. The keywords we used were “pyomyositis” and “obturator.” The title and abstract of each article identified by the above search terms were examined, and if the article appeared potentially eligible for inclusion, we then examined its full text. The reference list of every included article was searched for additional relevant articles, which were also subjected to the same screening process.

We conducted a full-text review of a total of 37 articles, and 12 of these were discarded because of irrelevant or noninterpretable content. The full text of each of the remaining 25 articles was then assessed in greater detail (Table (Table1 ).1 ). They were considered relevant with respect to identifying pyomyositis of the external obturator, the age of the patients, causative organisms, biological and bacteriological investigations, and treatment.[2,4,931] The total number of patients included in this review, including our own cases, is 80. The study represented level-4 evidence according to the CEBM classification, and this evidence yielded only a grade-C recommendation on both the centre for evidence-based medicine and strength of recommendation taxonomy scales.

Table 1

Clinical findings, biology, imagery, bacteriology, treatment of 80 children with obturator pyomyositis, based on recent reviews of literature.

Table 1 (Continued)

Clinical findings, biology, imagery, bacteriology, treatment of 80 children with obturator pyomyositis, based on recent reviews of literature.

4. Discussion and review of literature

Pelvic pyomyositis is relatively uncommon in pediatric patients. Accurate diagnosis is frequently delayed due to nonspecific clinical presentation, poorly evident signs of infection, and above all, to the lack of awareness of this condition among children by general practitioners. Thus, this infection remains difficult to diagnose, and often it is mistaken for other causes of low hip pain. Children with fever, refusal to bear, and an irritable hip represent a diagnostic challenge. When pyomyositis involves the pelvic musculature, diagnosis becomes even more difficult because the deep structures cannot be examined directly, and the chances of differential diagnosis increase substantially.

This case report firstly highlights how difficult it is to realize the appropriate diagnosis of pelvic pyomyositis. The correct diagnosis was established relatively late in the course of the disease in our patient (10 days). This delay in diagnosis is unfortunately consistent with other studies in which delays longer than 10 days have been reported. Zvulunov et al[32] report an average delay of 12 days which resulted in permanent disability in 3.4% of cases reviewed. Mignemi et al[33] found that pericapsular pyomyositis is twice as common as septic arthritis in children presenting with an acutely irritable hip. The same authors consider that clinical algorithms are incapable of differentiating these pathologies and suggest that both must be considered under the current diagnosis previously referred to as “presumed septic arthritis.” However, septic arthritis should be excluded first, which if left untreated could have devastating functional consequences.

Uncontrolled pelvic pyomyositis can cause sequelae such as septic shock, the osteomyelitis of adjacent bones, and septic arthritis. Children who present with symptoms and signs suggesting hip effusion or musculoskeletal sepsis in the region of the hip should immediately have an ultrasound or even a synovial fluid aspiration of the affected hip. In our case, hip septic arthritis was the initial diagnostic hypothesis, and we considered that the elbow septic arthritis was consecutive to a secondary to hematogenous contamination. Our case report also suggests that a normal fluid aspiration of the hip – which definitively excludes the diagnosis of septic arthritis – represents an indication for MRI.[18,29]

Over the past several years, MRI has become the procedure of choice to diagnose pelvic pyomyositis in children. MRI is 97% sensitive and 92% specific in diagnosing acute musculoskeletal infection and discloses early soft tissue and marrow edema.[7] Some authors have outlined 3 stages of pyomyositis as a gradual progression from diffuse inflammation, (stage 1) to focal abscess formation, (stage 2) and finally to a septic state (stage 3).[3437] It is also useful to define the extent of osseous and extraosseous lesions.[38] Trusen et al[39] recommend that MRI should be the imaging method of choice for the pelvis whenever possible.

In this review of literature (Table (Table1 ),1 ), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus is the most often reported causative organism for pelvic pyomyositis in children (80%).[2,4,11,12,1525,27,2931] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (11.5%)[9,11,23,30] or Streptococcus group A (6.5%)[11,28,29] have also been implicated. However, Pannaraj et al[3] report the emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pediatric musculoskeletal infections, especially in the United States, since 2000. In 80% of cases, blood cultures are usually sufficient to identify the pathogen.[2,912,1517,1925,2730] In cases of negative blood cultures, classical isolation methods yield to pathogen identification in abscess specimens most of the time (22.5%).[4,11,23,25,30,31]

Pelvic pyomyositis can be successfully treated with empiric antibiotics; there are 2 indications for proceeding with surgical drainage and washout: an MRI-confirmed abscess with refractory antibiotics, and an abscess causing mass effects on solid organs and neurovascular structures.[23,40] Four treatment approaches are described in the literature. There are 2 traditional approaches, the ilioinguinal and Pfannenstiel approaches, which require lengthy incisions and extensive dissections.[4143] Less invasive approaches have also been reported: Menge et al[23] with the Vanderbilt approach, and the transgluteal approach by White et al.[30]

In conclusion, our case study highlights the fact that hip pain and fever should not always be concluded a septic joint infection. The differential should include osteomyelitis, septic joints, and pelvic pyomyositis. Any delay in diagnosis can lead to complications. MRI is the most efficacious procedure of choice to confirm this rare infectious condition.

5. Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's legal guardian concerning publication of this manuscript and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Footnotes

Abbreviation: MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

[1] Ovadiaa DEE, Ben-Sirab L, Kesslerb A, et al. Primary pyomyositis in children: a retrospective analysis of 11 cases. J Pediatr Orthop B 2007;16:153–9. [PubMed]
[2] Mitsionis GI, Manoudis GN, Lykissas MG, et al. Pyomyositis in children: early diagnosis and treatment. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44:2173–8. [PubMed]
[3] Pannaraj PS, Hulten KG, Gonzalez BE, et al. Infective pyomyositis and myositis in children in the era of community-acquired, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:953–60. [PubMed]
[4] Scillia A, Cox G, Milman E, et al. Primary osteomyelitis of the acetabulum resulting in septic arthritis of the hip and obturator internus abscess diagnosed as acute appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:1707–10. [PubMed]
[5] Kim EY, Kwack KS, Cho JH, et al. Usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in differentiating between septic arthritis and transient synovitis in the hip joint. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:428–33. [PubMed]
[6] Kirkhus E, Flato B, Riise O, et al. Differences in MRI findings between subgroups of recent-onset childhood arthritis. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:432–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[7] Mazur JM, Ross G, Cummings J, et al. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of acute musculoskeletal infections in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1995;15:144–7. [PubMed]
[8] Browne LP, Guillerman RP, Orth RC, et al. Community-acquired staphylococcal musculoskeletal infection in infants and young children: necessity of contrast-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of growth cartilage involvement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:194–9. [PubMed]
[9] Amari R, Yokoi H. Pyomyositis of the obturator internus muscle extending to septic arthritis of the hip in a child: a case report. J Pediatr Orthop B 2014;23:55–8. [PubMed]
[10] Bansal M, Bhaliak V, Bruce CE. Obturator internus muscle abscess in a child: a case report. J Pediatr Orthop B 2008;17:223–4. [PubMed]
[11] Bertrand SL, Lincoln ED, Prohaska MG. Primary pyomyositis of the pelvis in children: a retrospective review of 8 cases. Orthopedics 2011;34:e832–40. [PubMed]
[12] Bodart E, Motte F, Michel M, et al. [Limp with fever in adolescent: about 2 cases of pyomyositis]. Arch Pediatr 2008;15:1304–7. [PubMed]
[13] Chong X, Ashik M, Arjandas M. Obturator internus pyomyositis in a child: a case report. Malays Orthop J 2014;8:69–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[14] Duthie G, Corry C, Munro F, et al. Obturator internus pyomyositis. Emerg Med J 2010;27:475. [PubMed]
[15] Garcia-Mata S, Hidalgo-Ovejero A, Esparza-Estaun J. Primary obturator-muscle pyomyositis in immunocompetent children. J Child Orthop 2012;6:205–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[16] Gonzalez Moran G, Garcia Duran C, Albinana J. Imaging on pelvic pyomyositis in children related to pathogenesis. J Child Orthop 2009;3:479–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[17] Iyer S, Lobo M, Capell W. Obturator internus pyomyositis: a differential diagnosis for septic arthritis of the hip. J Paediatr Child Health 2005;41:534–5. [PubMed]
[18] Karmazyn B, Loder RT, Kleiman MB, et al. The role of pelvic magnetic resonance in evaluating nonhip sources of infection in children with acute nontraumatic hip pain. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27:158–64. [PubMed]
[19] Khoshhal K, Abdelmotaal HM, Alarabi R. Primary obturator internus and obturator externus pyomyositis. Am J Case Rep 2013;14:94–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[20] Klein-Kremer A, Jassar H, Nachtigal A, et al. Primary pyomyositis in a young boy: clinical and radiologic features. Isr Med Assoc J 2010;12:511–3. [PubMed]
[21] Kosuge DD, Davis BJ. Obturator internus pyomyositis: iatrogenic haematogenous spread. J Pediatr Orthop B 2013;22:49–51. [PubMed]
[22] Kumar A, Anderson D. Primary obturator externus pyomyositis in a child presenting as hip pain: a case report. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008;24:97–8. [PubMed]
[23] Menge TJ, Cole HA, Mignemi ME, et al. Medial approach for drainage of the obturator musculature in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2014;34:307–15. [PubMed]
[24] Nikolopoulos DD, Apostolopoulos A, Polyzois I, et al. Obturator internus pyomyositis in a young adult: a case report and review of the literature. Cases J 2009;2:8588. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[25] Orlicek SL, Abramson JS, Woods CR, et al. Obturator internus muscle abscess in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:744–8. [PubMed]
[26] Slade T, Hawkes R, Atherton G, et al. Obturator externus pyomyositis. Pediatr Emerg Care 2014;30:638–9. [PubMed]
[27] Spiegel DA, Meyer JS, Dormans JP, et al. Pyomyositis in children and adolescents: report of 12 cases and review of the literature. J Pediatr Orthop 1999;19:143–50. [PubMed]
[28] Tharmarajah H, Marks M. Early use of MRI for suspected pyomyositis. J Paediatr Child Health 2015;51:651–2. [PubMed]
[29] Viani RM, Bromberg K, Bradley JS. Obturator internus muscle abscess in children: report of seven cases and review. Clin Infect Dis 1999;28:117–22. [PubMed]
[30] White S, Stopka S, Nimityongskul P, et al. Transgluteal approach for drainage of obturator internus abscess in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Orthop 2017;37:e62–6. [PubMed]
[31] Wong-Chung J, Bagali M, Kaneker S. Physical signs in pyomyositis presenting as a painful hip in children: a case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Orthop B 2004;13:211–3. [PubMed]
[32] Zvulunov A, Gal N, Segev Z. Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis of the pelvis in childhood: diagnostic clues and pitfalls. Pediatr Emerg Care 2003;19:29–31. [PubMed]
[33] Mignemi ME, Menge TJ, Cole HA, et al. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pericapsular pyomyositis of the hip in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2014;34:316–25. [PubMed]
[34] Chiedozi LC. Pyomyositis. Review of 205 cases in 112 patients. Am J Surg 1979;137:255–9. [PubMed]
[35] Flier S, Dolgin SE, Saphir RL, et al. A case confirming the progressive stages of pyomyositis. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1551–3. [PubMed]
[36] Hall RL, Callaghan JJ, Moloney E, et al. Pyomyositis in a temperate climate. Presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:1240–4. [PubMed]
[37] Levin MJ, Gardner P, Waldvogel FA. An unusual infection due to staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 1971;284:196–8. [PubMed]
[38] De Boeck H, Noppen L, Desprechins B. Pyomyositis of the adductor muscles mimicking an infection of the hip. Diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:747–50. [PubMed]
[39] Trusen A, Beissert M, Schultz G, et al. Ultrasound and MRI features of pyomyositis in children. Eur Radiol 2003;13:1050–5. [PubMed]
[40] Bickels J, Ben-Sira L, Kessler A, et al. Primary pyomyositis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:2277–86. [PubMed]
[41] Berberoglu M, Uz A, Ozmen MM, et al. Corona mortis: an anatomic study in seven cadavers and an endoscopic study in 28 patients. Surg Endosc 2001;15:72–5. [PubMed]
[42] Karakurt L, Karaca I, Yilmaz E, et al. Corona mortis: incidence and location. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002;122:163–4. [PubMed]
[43] Luhmann SJ, Jones A, Schootman M, et al. Differentiation between septic arthritis and transient synovitis of the hip in children with clinical prediction algorithms. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:956–62. [PubMed]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health