Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of oximedOxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017; 2017: 8759764.
Published online 2017 February 21. doi:  10.1155/2017/8759764
PMCID: PMC5339630

Antigenotoxic Properties of Agaricus blazei against Hydrogen Peroxide in Human Peripheral Blood Cells


The ability of Agaricus blazei mushroom in its dried and powdered mycelial form was evaluated for its antigenotoxic properties for the first time. Antigenotoxic effects in human peripheral blood cells against H2O2-induced DNA damage were examined in pretreatment and posttreatment protocol by comet assay. The results showed better antigenotoxic properties of Agaricus blazei on the interventional level, respectively, after treatment. Agaricus blazei in concentration of 250 μg/mL after treatment was most efficient in regard to its action against DNA damage. The evaluation of repair kinetics showed decrease in H2O2 induced DNA damage 15 min after the application of A. blazei, reaching the maximum potency after 30 min. Analysis of antioxidant properties of Agaricus blazei revealed strong OH scavenging properties and moderate reducing power, while its DPPH scavenging ability was weak. In regard to our findings, we can conclude that our preliminary results demonstrated antigenotoxic properties of Agaricus blazei and its strong OH scavenging ability. Mechanisms underlying its properties should be further evaluated in in vivo studies.

1. Introduction

Agaricus blazei, also known as God's mushroom, Mushroom of life, Royal Sun Agaricus, Mushroom of the Sun, Almond mushroom, or Princess, is coming from southern Brazil [1, 2]. This is an edible mushroom with identified beneficial health effects, like prevention of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, arteriosclerosis, and chronic hepatitis [2]. Agaricus blazei is vastly used in traditional medicine in the form of a medicinal extract for the prevention and treatment of cancer, as it shows strong immunomodulating properties [3, 4]. Potential antigenotoxic and antimutagen activities have been reported. However, the protective effects of Agaricus blazei against well known mutagens have not been established [514].

In general, the major composition of the mushrooms is water (90%), protein (2–40%), carbohydrate (1–55%), fiber (3–32%), and ash (8–10%) (ash is mainly composed of salts and metals like calcium and magnesium) [3]. Among the carbohydrates are some biologically active polysaccharides, such as β-glucans, that attract the attention of researchers [15]. The polysaccharides phytocomplex is thought to be responsible for its pharmacotoxicological effects [16]. The results of Kozarski et al. indicated that polysaccharide extracts of medicinal mushrooms Agaricus bisporus and Agaricus brasiliensis act as natural antioxidants [17].

The plentiful presence of free radicals in the environment is associated with the appearance of oxidative stress, which is a basis of aging and the initiation and progress of various diseases and disorders [18]. Hydrogen peroxide causes oxidative DNA damage through the production of a hydroxyl radical (OH-), which can generate multiple DNA modifications, such as base damage, sugar damage, and DNA protein crosslinks. These modifications can ultimately lead to single-strand and double-strands break, inducing genotoxic effects. These alterations can affect the immune response not only in inflammatory diseases but also in cancers [19, 20].

The comet test is a well-established and highly sensitive method that has been used for examining DNA damage and can be applied to assess the genotoxic and genoprotective potentials of several natural products [1921]. At the same time, the comet assay can be used to measure DNA repair potential in individual cells [19].

A genoprotective activity of the mushroom can play a significant role in prevention and treatment of several mentioned disorders, but very few studies have been done to examine it as a possible therapeutic approach [22, 23]. Menoli et al. observed antigenotoxic potential against DNA damage induced by methyl methanesulfonate in the comet assay [8].

Based on the above findings, the aim of this study was to evaluate genotoxic potential of Agaricus blazei on human peripheral white blood cells in vitro in a range of concentrations, to determine its safe nongenotoxic concentrations and to further test its antigenotoxic effects against H2O2 induced DNA damage. Also, the objective was to assess antioxidant potential of Agaricus blazei using reducing power, OH scavenging, and DPPH assays.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Subjects

Peripheral blood samples were collected from three healthy participants: females, between the ages of 20 and 35 years. They did not use cigarettes, alcohols, medicaments, or food supplements in a period of two months. Participants gave their consent in accordance with the regulations of the ethical standards of Ethics Committee for Clinical Trials of the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade.

2.2. Study Design

In the current study a commercial product of Agaricus blazei was tested in the form of capsules (Agaricus blazei, Aloha Medicinals, Inc, Carson City, NV, USA/Santa Cruz, CA, USA facility). The capsules contained the mushroom in its mycelial form which had been grown on white sorghum, aged, dried, and powdered. The powder was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), stirred for 30 min at 37°C, and filtered through a filter paper. Three concentrations of 250, 500, and 1000 μg/mL were made to perform the comet assay experiments.

2.2.1. Genotoxic and Antigenotoxic Assessment of Agaricus blazei by Comet Assay

A comet assay was performed to evaluate the genotoxic and antigenotoxic properties of Agaricus blazei mushroom. A concentration of 50 μM H2O2 was chosen to induce a consistent level of DNA damage in human peripheral white blood cells. Suspension of human peripheral blood cells was embedded in a 0.67% low-melting-point agarose and spread to microscopic slides. The cells were exposed to the following treatments: (1) to evaluate the genotoxicity of the mushroom, the cells were exposed to Agaricus blazei in three different concentrations (250, 500, and 1000 μg/mL) for 30 min at 37°C; two protocols were used to evaluate antigenotoxic potential, before treatment and after treatment: (2) before treatment, the cells were incubated with the Agaricus blazei prior to their exposure to H2O2 (an assessment of the mushrooms' action at the preventive level); and (3) after treatment, the cells were treated with the mushroom after their exposure to H2O2 (an assessment of the mushrooms' action at the interventional level). The cells were treated with A. blazei for 30 min at 37°C, while treatment with H2O2 was conducted for 20 min at 4°C.

In the antigenotoxic assessment, a solution of a well known antioxidant, quercetin in PBS, was used as a positive control. Quercetin has demonstrated high antioxidant and antigenotoxic activity previously in our experimental conditions for tested concentrations: 100, 250, and 500 μg/mL, whereas H2O2 treatment of the cells was performed as a negative control.

For the test of genotoxicity, the cells were treated with PBS as a negative control and H2O2 as a positive control.

2.2.2. Kinetics of Attenuation of H2O2-Induced DNA Damage with Agaricus blazei after Treatment by Comet Assay

To evaluate the repair kinetics in H2O2-induced DNA damage after treatment with Agaricus blazei, the most effective concentration was chosen from previous posttreatment tests. Following 20 min of H2O2 (50 μM) treatment at 4°C, cells that have been treated with the A. blazei were incubated at 37°C for 4 time periods: 15, 30, 45, and 60 min.. Simultaneously, for the positive controls, the cells were treated with PBS and examined at the same intervals.

2.3. The Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis Assay (Comet Assay)

The viability of cells used in different treatments was checked with trypan blue exclusion method. For the estimation of the dead cell fraction, cell samples were stained with a 0.4% solution of trypan blue in PBS. The number of blue-stained (dead) cells within 2,000 cells was counted on haemocytometer. The cell viability was above 90%.

The comet assay was performed essentially as described by Singh et al. [24]. Briefly, 6 μL of whole blood samples was suspended in 0,67% low-melting-point agarose (LMP) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and pipetted onto superfrosted glass microscope slides precoated with a layer of 1% of normal-melting-point agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), spread by a coverslip, and maintained for 5 min in the freezer to solidify. After gently removing the coverslips, the cell suspensions on slides were treated with tested mushroom and H2O2 as described above in three mentioned types of experiments. Following the treatments, all slides were covered with the third layer of 0,5% LMP agarose and again allowed to solidify in the freezer for 5 min. After removal of the coverslips, the slides were placed in cold lysing solution (2,5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris, 1% Triton X 100 and 10% dimethylsulfoxide, pH 10 adjusted with NaOH) at 4°C overnight. The next day, the slides were removed from lysing solution, placed in the horizontal gel electrophoresis tank (CHU2 manufacturer, connected to a Power Supplier EPS 601), and flooded with cold fresh electrophoresis buffer (10 M NaOH, 200 mM EDTA) allowing the DNA to denature for 30 min before electrophoresis. The electrophoresis was conducted in dimmed light at 25 V and 300 mA for 30 min, and slides were afterwards stained with ethidium bromide, performed as described by Singh et al. [24]. The comets were observed and analyzed using Olympus 50 microscope (Olympus Optical Co., GmbH Hamburg, Germany), equipped with a fluorescence recording device at 100x magnification.

The numbers of comets were used as parameter that reflected DNA damage. Nuclei of cells, resembling comets, were graded by eye inspection into 5 classes, depending on the extent of DNA damage, as described by Anderson et al. [19] representing (1) class A: undamaged cells with no comet tail (<5% damaged DNA); (2) class B: low-level damage (5%–20%); (3) class C: medium-level damage (20%–40%); (4) class D: high level damage (40%–95%); and (5) class E: total destruction (>95%). The example of comet assay slide preparation with different classes of comets is given in Figure 1. DNA damage was characterized as DNA migration when the damage was more than 5% (B + C + D + E comet classes). The mean value was calculated for 100 comets total per subject (the mean number from 100 on each of two slides), for each experiment. Apoptotic and necrotic cells were excluded from the analyses.

Figure 1
The example of comet assay slide preparation with different classes of comets (cell nuclei stained with ethidium bromide).

2.4. Reducing Power Assay

The reducing power was determined according to the method of Oyaizu [25]. Each concentration of A. blazei (0,062–2 mg/mL) in 50% DMSO deionized water was mixed with 2,5 mL of 200 mM/L sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6,6) and 2,5 mL of 10 mg/mL potassium ferricyanide, and the mixture was incubated at 50°C for 20 min. Afterwards 2,5 mL of 100 mg/mL trichloroacetic acid was added to the mixture and then centrifuged at 200g for 10 min. The upper layer was mixed with 5 mL of deionized water and 1 mL of 1 mg/mL ferric chloride; the absorbance was then measured at 700 nm against a blank. A higher absorbance value indicated a higher reducing power. Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was used as standard. The concentrations of the Agaricus blazei and BHT used for the analysis were in a range of 0.019, 0.039, 0.078, 0.156, 0.132, 0.625, 1.25, 2.50, and 5.00 mg/mL.

2.5. Determination of DPPH Radicals Scavenging Ability

The scavenging ability on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicals was determined according to the method of Shimada et al. [26]. Each concentration of A. blazei (0,062–2 mg/mL) in 50% DMSO was mixed with 1 mL of methanolic solution containing DPPH (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) radicals, resulting in a final concentration of 0,2 mM/L DPPH. The mixture was shaken vigorously and left to stand for 30 min in the dark. The absorbance was then measured at 517 nm against a blank. The scavenging ability was calculated as follows:


IC50 value (mg/mL) shows the effective concentration at which 50% of DPPH radicals were inhibited and were obtained by interpolation from linear regression analysis. Trolox was used as standard for comparison. The concentrations of the Agaricus blazei and Trolox used for the analysis were in a range of 0.062, 0.125, 0.250, 0.500, 1.00, and 2.00 mg/mL.

2.6. Determination of Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Activity

The effect of hydroxyl radical was assayed using the 2-deoxyribose oxidation method described in Chung et al. [27]. 2-Deoxyribose is oxidized by the hydroxyl radical that is formed by the Fenton reaction and degraded to malondialdehyde. The reaction mixture contained 0,45 mL of 0,2 M sodium phosphate (pH 7,6), 0,15 mL of 10 mM 2-deoxyribose, 0,15 mL of 10 mM FeSO4-EDTA, 0,15 mL of 10 mM hydrogen peroxide, 0,525 mL of distilled water, and 0,075 mL (0,062–2 mg/mL) of A. blazei solution in a tube. The reaction was started by the addition of hydrogen peroxide. After incubation at 37°C for 1 h, the reaction was stopped by adding 0,75 mL of 2,8% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and 0,75 mL of 1.0% (w/v) of thiobarbituric acid. The mixture was boiled for 10 min., cooled in ice, and then measured at 535 nm. The reaction mixture not containing test sample was used as the control. Trolox (0,0078–2 mg/mL) was used as standard antioxidant. The scavenging activity on hydroxyl radicals was expressed as follows:


IC50 value (mg/mL) was the effective concentration by which 50% of 2-deoxyribose was degraded and was obtained by interpolation from linear regression analysis. Trolox was used as standard for comparison. The concentrations of the Agaricus blazei and Trolox used for the analysis were in a range of 0.007, 0.015, 0.031, 0.062, 0.125, 0.250, 0.500, 1.00, and 2.00 mg/mL.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using a Kruskal Wallis test, with Dunn's post hoc for comparisons of different treatments versus the respective controls. Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), with n = 3. A difference at p < 0,05 was considered statistically significant. GraphPad Prism (5.0) statistical software (GraphPad Software Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for the analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Genotoxic Properties of Agaricus blazei

In the assessment of the genotoxic potential of Agaricus blazei, it was found that the tested range of concentrations applied to agarose-embedded blood cells did not increase DNA migration in comparison to the negative control (i.e., the PBS) (Figure 2). Moreover, for all tested concentrations, the basal level of primary lesions decreased in regard to the control. Based on our results, the Agaricus blazei in the tested concentrations indicated a lack of a genotoxic effect.

Figure 2
The evaluation of genotoxic effects of Agaricus blazei in 3 tested concentrations after 30 min of incubation at 37°C. Bars represent mean number of cells with DNA damage ± SEM, for n = 3.

3.2. Antigenotoxic Properties of Agaricus blazei

The antigenotoxic effects of Agaricus blazei were examined under two experiment protocols: pretreatment with the mushroom prior to H2O2 exposure and posttreatment with the mushroom after the treatment with H2O2 that causes oxidative DNA damage through the production of a hydroxyl radical (OH).

Figure 3(a) shows that pretreatment application of the mushroom displayed slight reduction in the mean number of damaged cells, where concentration of 500 μg/mL exhibited significant attenuation in comparison to the control (cells treated with 50 μM H2O2). Interestingly, the U-shaped concentration-dependent trend could be noticed in the pretreatment attenuation of the DNA damage induced by H2O2.

Figure 3
The evaluation of antigenotoxic properties of Agaricus blazei against DNA damage induced by H2O2 in (a) pretreatment and (b) posttreatment protocol. Bars represent mean number of cells with DNA damage ± SEM, for n = 3; *p < 0.05, ...

Posttreatment conditions are displayed in Figure 3(b). Results showed that all three concentrations significantly decreased the number of cells with DNA damage (p < 0,05), displaying an antigenotoxic effect of Agaricus blazei at an intervention level.

Figure 4 shows the results of positive controls in which the cells were treated with 100, 250, and 500 μg/mL of quercetin, where the percentage of DNA damaged cells decreased in a concentration-dependent manner for both pretreatment and posttreatment experiment. However, the antigenotoxic effect of quercetin was more profound in posttreatment experiment, as well.

Figure 4
The evaluation of antigenotoxic properties of quercetin against the DNA damage induced by H2O2 in (a) pretreatment and (b) posttreatment protocol. Bars represent mean number of cells with DNA damage ± SEM, for n = 3; *p < 0.05, ...

According to posttreatment results of Agaricus blazei, the concentration of 250 μg/mL was chosen as the most efficient in action on intervention level. It was later used to investigate a time course of DNA repair (the reparation kinetics in H2O2 induced DNA damage). The results of attenuation of H2O2-induced DNA damage in 4 times periods: 15, 30, 45, and 60 min, both in cells treated with A. blazei and in control, are presented in Figure 5. In the control, where cells were incubated for the mentioned periods without any additional treatment after the H2O2 exposure, the levels of H2O2-induced DNA lesions were not significantly decreased (Figure 5(a)), although data showed that untreated cells displayed potential to attenuate DNA damage. However, it should be noted that, in the presence of A. blazei at the time points 15, 30, and 45 min, there was significant attenuation of H2O2 induced damage (Figure 5(b)).

Figure 5
A Time course of DNA damage repair of cells exposed to H2O2 and afterwards incubated for 15, 30, 45, and 60 min (a) without any treatment; (b) with 250 μg/mL of the Agaricus blazei. Bars represent mean number of cells with DNA ...

3.3. Determination of Reducing Power of Agaricus blazei

The reducing power of A. blazei is presented in Figure 6. In tested concentrations (0,062–5 mg/mL) A. blazei showed concentration-dependent moderate reducing power ability when compared to BHT as control.

Figure 6
The reducing power of Agaricus blazei compared to BHT.

3.4. Determination of DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity of Agaricus blazei

The DPPH radical scavenging effects of A. blazei are presented in Table 1. Results show that A. blazei in concentrations used in this test has no free radical scavenging activity. The free radical scavenging activity of A. blazei was compared to Trolox, a synthetic antioxidant. A. blazei of 2 mg/mL showed only 3% inhibition of DPPH.

Table 1
DPPH scavenging ability of Agaricus blazei compared to Trolox, expressed as % inhibition (n = 3).

3.5. Determination of Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Activity of Agaricus blazei

Figure 7 shows the hydroxyl radical scavenging effects determined by the 2-deoxyribose oxidation method. The scavenging effect of A. blazei on hydroxyl radical showed 50% inhibition for all tested concentrations above 0,196 mg/mL (IC50 = 0,196 mg/mL), while Trolox as standard at the same concentration showed 60% inhibition. These results indicate an excellent hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of Agaricus blazei.

Figure 7
Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of Agaricus blazei in a range of concentrations (0,007–2 mg/mL) compared to Trolox.

4. Discussion

In this work, we assessed the genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity effects of A. blazei on human peripheral blood cells. DNA strand breaks were measured using a simple and reproducible technique, the comet assay. Compared to many other macromolecules, DNA is a sensitive molecule and damage may result from exposure to exogenous agents. Prolonged or repeated DNA damage and genomic instability can contribute to multiple diseases including cancer [28].

In the current study, no genotoxic effects of A. blazei on human peripheral blood cells were determined. This is in agreement with the reports by Radaković et al. [29] and Guterrez et al. [10, 12]. Namely, the exposure of cells to the mushroom in our experiment even leads to a reduction of the baseline level of DNA damage. Meanwhile, the beneficial role of Agaricus blazei in reduction of H2O2 induced DNA damage in whole blood cells was demonstrated. As a positive control quercetin was used. Quercetin is a standard antioxidant that effectively reduces H2O2-induced DNA damage [30]. The reduction of DNA damage by quercetin in this experiment was a confirmation that a ROS attack on the DNA underlies the origin of strands breaks. Therefore, it can be noted that Agaricus blazei also exhibited effective attenuation of free radical induced DNA strand breaks.

To elucidate the possible mechanism behind the antigenotoxic action of the A. blazei, two approaches were applied in order to investigate whether the mushroom could act at the preventive and the interventional level. In pretreatment conditions, A. blazei was added to cells 30 min before administration of the oxidant, allowing them to be active at the prevention level [31]. Under pretreatment conditions the mushroom may act by increasing the antioxidant capacity of the cells, making them more resistant to oxidative DNA damage [32]. The results of pretreatment showed moderate ability to decrease the number of DNA damaged cells, where 500 μg/mL concentration displayed a significant protective effect against H2O2. It was shown by de Sá-Nakanishi et al. [33] that the administration of A. blazei was protective to the brain of old rats against oxidative stress by increasing the brains enzymatic antioxidant capacity, showing an inducible effect on their activities. Also, the action of an A. blazei pretreatment on the paracetamol injury in rats exhibited the ability of boosting the levels of the catalase [34].

On the other hand, posttreatment data displayed a significant decrease in the number of cells with DNA damage at all tested concentrations showing prominent interventional activities of A. blazei. Antigenotoxic effect of A. blazei seen after treatment could be assigned to synergistic action of independent mechanisms which possibly contributed in DNA damage reduction: free radical scavenging and stimulation of DNA repair.

It has been established that mushrooms can demonstrate their antioxidant properties at different stages of the oxidation process and by different mechanisms [35]. The antioxidant properties in this study were examined by the reducing power method and scavenging abilities on OH radicals and DPPH radicals. The reducing power of Agaricus blazei showed a concentration-dependent trend and was 0,3 at 2 mg/mL which is considered as a moderate power. This is in accordance with previous results shown by Tsai et al. [36] that demonstrated similar reducing power of ethanolic extract of A. blazei.

The scavenging ability is important antioxidant protection against high reactivity of free radicals. Our data on DPPH scavenging ability showed that the activity of A. blazei was extremely modest. This could be explained by the fact that the antioxidant activity of natural compounds is associated with their structures, and their accessibility to the radical centre of DPPH could influence their antioxidant power [37]. It should be emphasized that we evaluated the ability of Agaricus blazei as a mushroom in its dried and powdered mycelial form dissolved in PBS, so the structure of its compounds could affect its antioxidant abilities. Work by Tsai et al. [36] showed different antioxidant properties of A. blazei dependent on the extraction procedure. On the other hand, A. blazei in our study showed pronounced OH scavenging properties for the concentrations above 0,196 mg/mL. Hydroxyl radical is the most reactive chemical species known to induce oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA. Accordingly, the compounds with OH scavenging properties are of extreme importance in biological systems. It should be noted that the application of A. blazei in the posttreatment comet assay provided the best attenuation of DNA damage at the 250 μg/mL concentration and which at the same time showed 70% inhibition of OH radical.

In order to assess the next mechanism that could have contributed to the posttreatment efficiency, a time course of DNA repair in the cells treated with the optimal concentration of Agaricus blazei was investigated and compared with untreated cells (exposed only to PBS). Data showed that posttreatment with the mushroom significantly decreased the level of cells with DNA damage in the 15, 30, and 45 time course, while the cells treated only with PBS did not display significant reduction of the DNA damage in the same time frame. It should be mentioned that a similar trend in DNA damage reduction was detected in both experimental conditions: a decrease in DNA damage was observed already at 15 min, reaching the maximum reduction after 45 min. Previous studies showed that significant repair of DNA damage occurred within 1 h after the exposure to the oxidative agent [38]. Therefore, those results indicate that Agaricus blazei could significantly stimulate the repair process in DNA damaged cells, and the repair capacity of cells treated with mushroom is more efficient than the repair capacity of untreated cells. Study of Da Silva et al. [39] showed protective effect of β-glucan extracted from Agaricus blazei on the expression of the genes ERCC5 (involved in excision repair of DNA damage) on HepG2 cells.

Bearing in mind that efficiency of pretreatment can be explained by Agaricus blazei property of being able to increase the cells' antioxidant capacity, possible synergistic (additional) mechanism of posttreatment action could be the antioxidant enzymes stimulation.

Summarizing previous findings, Agaricus blazei activity on the interventional level can be attributed to its scavenging properties, stimulation of DNA repair, as well as additional antioxidant enzyme activation. It should be especially emphasized that for the first time it has been revealed that Agaricus blazei has strong potential in reduction of OH groups.

Our study was conducted as an in vitro test, which should contribute to highlighting Agaricus blazei as an antioxidant that attenuates the impact of oxidative stress to DNA. According to these findings, it is necessary to perform further investigation of its properties on in vivo systems.

5. Conclusion

Agaricus blazei is under investigation for a broad range of applications. This preliminary study shows antigenotoxic properties of Agaricus blazei on human peripheral blood cells against H2O2-induced DNA damage on the interventional level. Also, for the first time, it was shown that Agaricus blazei has strong OH scavenging properties. Mechanisms underlying the antigenotoxic properties should be further evaluated in in vivo studies.


This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia (Grant OI173034).

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


1. Wasser S. Medicinal mushrooms as a source of antitumor and immunomodulating polysaccharides. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2002;60(3):258–274. doi: 10.1007/s00253-002-1076-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Kerrigan R. W. Agaricus subrufescens, a cultivated edible and medicinal mushroom, and its synonyms. Mycologia. 2005;97(1):12–24. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.97.1.12. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Firenzuoli F., Gori L. Herbal medicine today: clinical and research issues. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2007;4(1):37–40. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem096. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Hetland G., Johnson E., Lyberg T., Bernardshaw S., Tryggestad A. M. A., Grinde B. Effects of the medicinal mushroom Agaricus blazei Murill on immunity, infection and cancer. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology. 2008;68(4):363–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2008.02156.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Huang S.-J., Mau J.-L. Antioxidant properties of methanolic extracts from Agaricus blazei with various doses of γ-irradiation. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2006;39(7):707–716. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2005.06.001. [Cross Ref]
6. Carvajal A. E. S. S., Koehnlein E. A., Soares A. A., et al. Antitumor-active heteroglycans from niohshimeji mushroom, Tricholoma giganteum. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 1995;59(4):568–571. [PubMed]
7. Delmanto R. D., De Lima P. L. A., Sugui M. M., et al. Antimutagenic effect of Agaricus blazei Murrill mushroom on the genotoxicity induced by cyclophosphamide. Mutation Research. 2001;496(1-2):15–21. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(01)00228-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Menoli R. C. R. N., Mantovani M. S., Ribeiro L. R., Speit G., Jordão B. Q. Antimutagenic effects of the mushroom Agaricus blazei Murrill extracts on V79 cells. Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2001;496(1-2):5–13. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(01)00227-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Bellini M. F., Giacomini N. L., Eira A. F., Ribeiro L. R., Mantovani M. S. Anticlastogenic effect of aqueous extracts of Agaricus blazei on CHO-k1 cells, studying different developmental phases of the mushroom. Toxicology in Vitro. 2003;17(4):465–469. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(03)00043-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Guterrez Z. R., Mantovani M. S., Eira A. F., Ribeiro L. R., Jordão B. Q. Variation of the antimutagenicity effects of water extracts of Agaricus blazei Murrill in vitro. Toxicology in Vitro. 2004;18(3):301–309. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2003.09.003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Gameiro P. H., Nascimento J. S., Rocha B. H. G., Piana C. F. B., Santos R. A., Takahashi C. S. Antimutagenic effect of aqueous extract from agaricus brasiliensis on culture of human lymphocytes. Journal of Medicinal Food. 2013;16(2):180–183. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2012.0068. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. da Rosa Guterres Z., Mantovani M. S., da Eira A. F., Ribeiro L. R., Jordão B. Q. Genotoxic and antigenotoxic effects of organic extracts of mushroom Agaricus blazei Murrill on V79 cells. Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2005;28(3):458–463. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572005000300022. [Cross Ref]
13. Luiz R. C., Jordão B. Q., Da Eira A. F., Ribeiro L. R., Mantovani M. S. Non-mutagenic or genotoxic effects of medicinal aqueous extracts from the Agaricus blazei mushroom in V79 cells. Cytologia. 2003;68(1):1–6. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.68.1. [Cross Ref]
14. Savić T., Patenković A., Soković M., Glamočlija J., Andjelković M., van Griensven L. J. L. D. The Effect of Royal Sun Agaricus, Agaricus brasiliensis S. Wasser et al., extract on methyl methanesulfonate caused genotoxicity in Drosophila melanogaster. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms. 2011;13(4):377–385. doi: 10.1615/intjmedmushr.v13.i4.80. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Mizuno T., Kinoshita T., Zhuang C., Ito H., Mayuzumi Y. Antitumor-active heteroglycans from niohshimeji mushroom, tricholoma giganteum. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 1995;59(4):568–571. doi: 10.1080/bbb.59.568. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Firenzuoli F., Gori L., Lombardo G. The medicinal mushroom Agaricus blazei murrill: review of literature and pharmaco-toxicological problems. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2008;5(1):3–15. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem007. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Kozarski M., Klaus A., Niksic M., Jakovljevic D., Helsper J. P. F. G., Van Griensven L. J. L. D. Antioxidative and immunomodulating activities of polysaccharide extracts of the medicinal mushrooms Agaricus bisporus, Agaricus brasiliensis, Ganoderma lucidum and Phellinus linteus. Food Chemistry. 2011;129(4):1667–1675. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.06.029. [Cross Ref]
18. Limón-Pacheco J., Gonsebatt M. E. The role of antioxidants and antioxidant-related enzymes in protective responses to environmentally induced oxidative stress. Mutation Research. 2009;674(1-2):137–147. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.09.015. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Anderson D., Yu T.-W., Phillips B. J., Schmezer P. The effect of various antioxidants and other modifying agents on oxygen-radical-generated DNA damage in human lymphocytes in the COMET assay. Mutation Research—Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 1994;307(1):261–271. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)90300-x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Fairbairn D. W., Olive P. L., O'Neill K. L. The comet assay: a comprehensive review. Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology. 1995;339(1):37–59. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(94)00013-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Henderson L., Wolfreys A., Fedyk J., Bourner C., Windebank S. The ability of the Comet assay to discriminate between genotoxins and cytotoxins. Mutagenesis. 1998;13(1):89–94. doi: 10.1093/mutage/13.1.89. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Shi Y., James A. E., Benzie I. F. F., Buswell J. A. Genoprotective activity of edible and medicinal mushroom components. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms. 2004;6:1–14.
23. Aviello G., Canadanovic-Brunet J. M., Milic N., et al. Potent antioxidant and genoprotective effects of boeravinone G, a rotenoid isolated from Boerhaavia diffusa. PLOS ONE. 2011;6(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019628.e19628 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Singh N. P., McCoy M. T., Tice R. R., Schneider E. L. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Experimental Cell Research. 1988;175(1):184–191. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(88)90265-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Oyaizu M. Studies on products of browning reaction prepared from glucose amine. Japanese Journal of Nutrition. 1986;44:307–315.
26. Shimada K., Fujikawa K., Yahara K., Nakamura T. Antioxidative properties of xanthan on the autoxidation of soybean oil in cyclodextrin emulsion. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1992;40(6):945–948. doi: 10.1021/jf00018a005. [Cross Ref]
27. Chung S.-K., Osawa T., Kawakishi S. Hydroxyl radical-scavenging effects of spices and scavengers from brown mustard (Brassica nigra) Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 1997;61(1):118–123. doi: 10.1271/bbb.61.118. [Cross Ref]
28. Savina N. V., Nikitchenko N. V., Kuzhir T. D., Rolevich A. I., Krasny S. A., Goncharova R. I. The cellular response to oxidatively induced DNA damage and polymorphism of some DNA repair genes associated with clinicopathological features of bladder cancer. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2016;2016:13. doi: 10.1155/2016/5710403.5710403 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Radaković M., Đelić N., Stevanović J., et al. Evaluation of the antigenotoxic effects of the royal sun mushroom, Agaricus brasiliensis (Higher basidiomycetes) in human lymphocytes treated with thymol in the comet assay. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms. 2015;17(4):321–330. doi: 10.1615/intjmedmushrooms.v17.i4.10. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Vasiljevic J., Zivkovic L. P., Cabarkapa A., Bajic V. P., Djelic N. J., Spremo-Potparevic B. M. Cordyceps sinensis: genotoxic potential in human peripheral blood cells and antigenotoxic properties against hydrogen peroxide by comet assay. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine. 2016;22(supplement 2):24–31. [PubMed]
31. Franke S. I. R., Prá D., Erdtmann B., Henriques J. A. P., Da Silva J. Influence of orange juice over the genotoxicity induced by alkylating agents: an in vivo analysis. Mutagenesis. 2005;20(4):279–283. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gei034. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Čabarkapa A., Živković L., Žukovec D., et al. Protective effect of dry olive leaf extract in adrenaline induced DNA damage evaluated using in vitro comet assay with human peripheral leukocytes. Toxicology in Vitro. 2014;28(3):451–456. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.12.014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Sá-Nakanishi A. B. D., Soares A. A., De Oliveira A. L., Fernando Comar J., Peralta R. M., Bracht A. Effects of treating old rats with an aqueous Agaricus blazei extract on oxidative and functional parameters of the brain tissue and brain mitochondria. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2014;2014:13. doi: 10.1155/2014/563179.563179 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Soares A. A., De Oliveira A. L., Sá-Nakanishi A. B., et al. Effects of an Agaricus blazei aqueous extract pretreatment on paracetamol-induced brain and liver injury in rats. BioMed Research International. 2013;2013:12. doi: 10.1155/2013/469180.469180 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Kozarski M., Klaus A., Jakovljevic D., et al. Antioxidants of edible mushrooms. Molecules. 2015;20(10):19489–19525. doi: 10.3390/molecules201019489. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Tsai S.-Y., Tsai H.-L., Mau J.-L. Antioxidant properties of Agaricus blazei, Agrocybe cylindracea, and Boletus edulis. LWT—Food Science and Technology. 2007;40(8):1392–1402. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2006.10.001. [Cross Ref]
37. Hussein M. A. A convenient mechanism for the free radical scavenging activity of resveratrol. International Journal of Phytomedicine. 2011;3(4):459–469.
38. Benhusein G. M., Mutch E., Aburawi S., Williams F. M. Genotoxic effect induced by hydrogen peroxide in human hepatoma cells using comet assay. Libyan Journal of Medicine. 2010;5(1):1–6. doi: 10.3402/ljm.v5i0.4637. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Da Silva A. F., Sartori D., MacEdo F. C., Jr., Ribeiro L. R., Fungaro M. H. P., Mantovani M. S. Effects of β-glucan extracted from Agaricus blazei on the expression of ERCC5, CASP9, and CYP1A1 genes and metabolic profile in HepG2 cells. Human and Experimental Toxicology. 2013;32(6):647–654. doi: 10.1177/0960327112468173. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity are provided here courtesy of Hindawi