Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of scientificaScientifica
Scientifica (Cairo). 2017; 2017: 8539093.
Published online 2017 February 19. doi:  10.1155/2017/8539093
PMCID: PMC5337397

Phragmites australis + Typha latifolia Community Enhanced the Enrichment of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in the Soil of Qin Lake Wetland


Aquatic plants play an essential role and are effective in mitigating lake eutrophication by forming complex plant-soil system and retaining total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP) in soils to ultimately reduce their quantities in aquatic systems. Two main vegetation types (Phragmites australis community and P. australis + Typha latifolia community) of Qin Lake wetland were sampled in this study for the analysis of TN and TP contents and reserves in the wetland soils. The results showed that (1) the consumption effect of Qin Lake wetland on soluble N was much more significant than on soluble P. (2) The efficiency of TN enrichment in wetland soil was enhanced by vegetation covering of P. australis and T. latifolia. (3) Wetland soil P was consumed by P. australis community and this pattern was relieved with the introduction of T. latifolia. (4) According to the grey relativity analysis, the most intensive interaction between plants and soil occurred in summer. In addition, the exchange of N in soil-vegetation system primarily occurred in the 0–15 cm soil layer. Our results indicated that vegetation covering was essential to the enrichment of TN and TP, referring to the biology-related fixation in the wetland soil.

1. Introduction

Eutrophication has now been an increasing problem in many countries. The Water Wheel reports in its recent issue that 54% of the lakes/reservoirs in Asia are impaired by eutrophication [1]. Comparatively, the percentage reaches 66% in China [2]. Total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) are the two major plant nutrients involved in the process of eutrophication [3, 4]. Extensive studies at the site scale have indicated that aquatic plants are effective in mitigating lake eutrophication, and many initiatives have been undertaken to improve water quality, such as introducing aquatic plants in the ecosystem and restoring or even creating wetland for this particular purpose [5]. The aquatic plants are able to form complex system with soils, where TN, TP, and some heavy metal elements cycle through various processes, such as litter decomposition, root absorption, and acid excretion, and ultimately retain N and P in soils to reduce their quantities in aquatic systems [6]. While various aquatic plants species have been adopted to treat eutrophication [7], Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia are the most commonly used aquatic plants in wetlands for the enhancement of water quality [8]. They have relatively high nutrients enrichment efficiencies compared to other plants, such as yellow flag (Iris pseudacorus L.) [7], contributing to effective nutrients removal from water in wetlands. However, their enrichment processes and the mechanisms are still unclear.

P. australis substantially improves the TN and TP removal efficiency in wetland ecosystem, due to its high growth rate and great capacity for nutrient accumulation in its stem, roots, and rhizomes [8]. It has a shallow-root system that often results in the nutrients enrichment occurring in surface soils through roots and rhizomes absorptions [911]. In addition, P. australis root biomass showed a positive correlation with the N content in aquatic system [12]. Add a few sentences of describing P. australis and T. latifolia and their abilities to enrich nutrients and their functions/mechanisms to remove N and P from water. By contrast, the enrichment efficiency of P is higher than that of N in T. latifolia [13]. It has a highly developed fine root system by which it can absorb the TN and TP in deep soil solutions and effectively increases the nutrient retention efficiency in wetland ecosystem [14]. Interestingly, P. australis and T. latifolia exhibit different tolerance to TN and TP deficiency, where P. australis is more tolerant to P limitation, while T. latifolia to N limitation [15, 16]. While a fair amount is known about the TN and TP retention efficiencies of P. australis and T. latifolia community, the nutrient retention efficiency of the mixed communities, such as P. australis and T. latifolia, is still unknown.

Qin Lake National Wetland Park is the second national wetland park in China approved by the State Forestry Administration [17]. In recent years, the water quality of the Qin Lake Wetland is dramatically decreasing due to the wastewater discharge, various pollutions, and dredged material disposal. The water N and P content has been increased by 4- and 17-fold, respectively, since the year from 1989 to 2010, which resulted in severe eutrophication [18]. Understanding the roles of the various aquatic plants in Qin Lake wetland, as well as their mechanisms by which they retain nutrients and purify water, provides theoretical support to the wetland management and the policy-making process. Here we select two typical riverfront communities (P. australis community, P. australis + T. latifolia community) in Qin Lake wetland to study the TN and TP stoichiometry in plant organs and the total N and P content in wetland soils and waters, as well as their seasonal variations, and to clarify how the two species differ in their contribution to wetland TN and TP enrichment, in order to improve understanding of the soil-vegetation nutrient cycle in wetland ecosystem and help aquatic plants management for Qin Lake.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

Qin Lake National Wetland Park is located in the middle of Jiangsu Province, Taizhou City, China (120°5′29.90′′E~120°6′14.70′′E, 32°37′2.70′′N~32°37′33.70′′N), 1.4 km in width (east-west) and 1.5 km in length (south-north), with an area of about 233.3 ha around. It has a humid subtropical climate with mild temperature and four distinct seasons.

Mean annual temperature is 16°C, respectively, 3.3°C in winter and 26.2°C in summer. Mean annual precipitation and relative humidity are 1031.8 mm and 80%. The average frost-free season is 220 days per year, and the annual leading wind directions are southeast wind. Present vegetation consists mainly of P. australis, T. latifolia, and so on. P. australis and T. latifolia community are the dominant plants, widely distributed in this area.

2.2. Experimental Design and Field Sampling

Two undisturbed sampling sites (A: P. australis dominated site and B: P. australis + T. latifolia dominated site) within the Qin Lake wetland were selected. 20 × 20 m control plot was established in both sites, where all the plants were removed once a month to prevent plant growth. Nine well-grown P. australis individuals were randomly collected in the two sites (outside the control plots) twice a season during February 2012–February 2013. Meanwhile, three additional plots (1 × 1 m) were selected in each site for harvesting the aboveground plant biomass at the end of growing season (late October), where plant stems, leaves, and spikes were collected separately in paper bags for analysing of plant biomass allocation. Roots were excavated and kept in polyethylene zip-top bags after removing dead roots and washing at the sampling sites. All plant materials were labeled and sent to lab for further analysis. Soil samples were collected from 0–15 cm, 15–30 cm, 30–45 cm, and 45–60 cm layers using multipoint mixing method. Flowing-water samples were collected at the locations 200 m up- and downstream of the channel in both sites. A transect was set up at each location and divided equally into 6 sections. Water sample at the 20 cm below the flow surface was collected for each section, separately kept in polyethylene bottle on ice, sealed tightly, and sent for lab analysis.

2.3. Determination of TN and TP in Plants, Soil, and Water

All plant samples were divided into roots, stems, leaves, and spikes, oven dried at 105°C for 15 min, and followed by 65°C for 24 hours to constant weight to measure the biomass. Dried plant samples were crushed, screened to a maximum particle size of 0.25 mm, and digested in H2SO4-H2O2 solution. TN was measured using the kjeldahl analysis methods and TP by the colorimetric molybdenum blue methods [19, 20]. Plant TN or TP storage (g/m2) was estimated by multiplying the biomass of each plant organs (g/m2) by total N or total P content (g/kg). Soil samples were air dried at room temperature, ground, and screened to a maximum particle size of 0.15 mm. TN and TP contents were measured, respectively, by the kjeldahl analysis methods and the colorimetric molybdenum blue methods. TN and TP of water samples were determined by ultraviolet spectrophotometric methods and spectrophotometric molybdate methods [21].

2.4. Data Analysis

TN and TP Concentrations were presented as mean values of at least three replicates. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SPSS 19.0, and multiple comparisons were made by Dunnett's tests at a significant level of 0.05.

Since P. australis is the dominant species in Qin Lake wetland, a Grey Correlation Analysis was performed to study the relationship between TN and TP contents in the P. australis organs and in the soil [22].

3. Result

3.1. The N and P Contents in Upstream and Downstream Waters

TN and TP contents were both low in the downstream water relative to the upstream water (P < 0.05, Table 1). The reduction rate of TN content (37.3%) in the downstream water was significantly lower than that of P content (27.3%).

Table 1
Annual average concentrations of N and P in the water of upstream and downstream of experimental sites (n = 12).

3.2. TN and TP Contents in Soils

In contrast to P. australis community, P. australis + T. latifolia community was higher in TN content in all soil layers (P < 0.05), while the TN content of P. australis community was higher than that of the control sites with plants harvested (0.05 < P < 0.08, Figure 1). The soil total P content was lowest in P. australis community (P < 0.01). No significant difference in total P content was observed between the soils in the mixed communities and the control sites (P > 0.05), except the 0–15 cm layer showing a significantly low total P content compared to the control site (P < 0.01). However, the TP content of P. australis community was significant lower than that of the control sites (P < 0.01).

Figure 1
Concentrations of TN and TP in different depths of soil in experimental site. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among TN and TP contents of soil (P < 0.05). Values are mean + 1 sem.

3.3. TN and TP Contents in Plant Organs

TN content was highest in P. australis leaves (P < 0.01), while little difference was observed between P. australis communities in sites A and B (P > 0.05, Figure 2). The total N content of T. latifolia leaves was lower than that of P. australis (P < 0.05), whereas other organs did not show significant difference in the total N content between the two species (P > 0.05). The total P content in both P. australis and T. latifolia varied significantly with the plant organ (Figure 2). It is 1.8- to 3.4-fold higher in T. latifolia spikes than in other organs. Conversely, TP content in the P. australis leaves was significantly higher than that of the spikes in the same community, which is consistent with the profile of TN allocation. Interestingly, TP was significantly increased in P. australis spikes in the P. australis + T. latifolia community, showing little difference to the leaves (P > 0.05). The P content in P. australis spikes of the mixed community is 2.5-fold higher than that of the P. australis community (P < 0.01).

Figure 2
Concentration of TN and TP in the organs of P. australis and T. latifolia in experimental sites. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among TN and TP contents of organs (P < 0.05). Values are mean + 1 sem.

The allocation of the nitrogen and phosphorus storage across organs in P. australis showed the same profile as roots > stems > leaves > spikes, while T. latifolia in the mixed community showed roots > spikes > stems > leaves (Table 2). The N and P storages in P. australis roots were 66.7% and 71.4% of the total N and P storage, which is higher than that in T. latifolia roots. By contrast, the N and P storages in spikes were significantly higher in T. latifolia (P < 0.05). The N and P storages of P. australis in P. australis community were only 4.2% and 2.6% of the TN and TP storage. Nonetheless, TP storage of P. australis in P. australis + T. latifolia community was significantly increased, taking up to 7.2% of the total P storage. This is 2.8-fold higher than that in P. australis community. Due to the notable difference in plant biomass between P. australis and T. latifolia, the N and P storage were both high in P. australis. However, the high P content in T. latifolia spikes results in the total P storage in T. latifolia community 2-fold higher than that in P. australis community.

Table 2
Organs biomass and N and P reserves of P. australis and T. latifolia (n = 8).

3.4. The Seasonal Variations of TN and TP Contents in Plant Organs

No data was collected on TN and TP content in T. latifolia spikes in late autumn and winter, during which the spikes disappear in response to the climate condition (Figure 3). The total N and P contents in P. australis stems and leaves were highest in summer, which is particularly true for TN. TN content in P. australis stems was higher in summer than other seasons up to 70–84%, while the P content up to 81–92%. TP content in P. australis roots did not vary with the season, which was likely due to the stable biomass and TP demands throughout the seasons, whereas, the high TP content in P. australis stems was likely due to the vigorous growth in summer that needs more TP than usual to promote plant growth. Similarly, TN contents in T. latifolia stems and leaves varied with season, both highest in summer, when the TN content among organs showed a pattern of spikes > leaves > stems > roots, while the P content was spikes > stems > leaves > roots. The high TN and TP contents in T. latifolia spikes were likely due to the fast growth and development in summer, which demands more TN and TP supply, compared to other seasons.

Figure 3
Seasonal dynamic concentration of TN and TP in the organs of P. australis and T. latifolia in experimental sites. The first and second columns of figure are the information of P. australis from sites A and B, and the third column is T. latifolia from ...

3.5. The Grey Correlation Analysis between Soil and the Contents of TN and TP about P. australis Organs

The association index of N content in P. australis and soil in different depth has negative correlation with soil depth, while the largest value of association index about P is the soil layer ≥15–30 cm (Table 3). P. australis needs N in the process of growth of different organs and obtains it mainly from the shallow soil, whereas the nutrient elements in the deep soil layer play a relatively small role in the growth of P. australis. There is no significant difference in various soil layers with the association index of P content, slightly increasing only in the soil layer ≥15–30 cm. It is in summer that the relationship of N and P contents is best in P. australis and soil. The plants thrive in summer, and the soil layer of 0–15 cm has large impact on P. australis gaining the N and P in summer which is a period of strong growth of plants. At the same time, as a result of the underground water level that rises higher in rain season, medium and lower soil layer may have greatly impact the content of nutrient elements in plants. This phenomenon is also reflected in spring, but the tendency is not significant compared with summer.

Table 3
Grey Correlation Analysis on contents of N and P between organs of P. australis and different depth of soil.

4. Discussions

Wetland soils play an important role in improving water quality, nutrient accumulation, and regeneration of nitrogen and phosphorus, which largely depends on the plant community structure [23, 24]. The notable reductions of TN and TP content in the downstream water of the research site indicated that Qin Lake wetland is able to remove the water N and P and that the ability of investigated communities to retain TN (reduced by 37.3%) is high as compared to TP (reduced by 27.3%), while P. australis and T. latifolia are two dominating aquatic plants, both of which are regularly used in construction wetlands to remove N and P from aquatic systems due to their competence in nutrient enrichment [2527]. The enhanced N retention in P. australis soils, especially in the 30–45 cm soil layer, was mainly attributed to the roots whose 43% were distributed in the below 30 cm soils. Furthermore, 91% of them were fine roots less than 2 mm in diameter, but with a massive surface area and fast turnover rate, which dramatically enhances the N enrichment in below 30 cm soils.

In addition, P. australis + T. latifolia community significantly increased the wetland soil TN content, demonstrating that plant community structure has significant impact on the wetland soil N retention (Figure 1). It was likely due to the mechanism of interspecific adaptations, where P. australis adopted stress tolerance mechanism, while T. latifolia adopted stress escape mechanism to accommodate interspecific competition as they coexisted in the same environment [28]. The adaptation was reflected by a series of changes mainly in morphological phenotypes, such as the elongation of T. latifolia root, decrease in stem diameter, decrease of the leaf numbers, and the increase of plant height [29]. The competition between P. australis and T. latifolia improved the plant nitrogen use and uptake efficiencies and promoted the biological N enrichment process, which ultimately contributed to the increase of soil total N through the plant-soil system. Contrarily, the wetland soil P content was significantly decreased in the P. australis community and maintained the same concentration in the P. australis + T. latifolia community (Figure 1), which was mainly attributed to the strategy of these two species referring to the low P condition in the environment. P. australis is able to grow in low P condition by adjusting the rhizospheric soil pH to solubilize insoluble P and making it available for plant uptake, which expedites soil P consumption and, on the long run, depletes P in the surface soils [30]. By contrast, T. latifolia growing in the P deficient condition relies on increasing its root biomass to acquire P from deep soil solution to support their growth without changing the soil chemical compositions [31], which ultimately retains P through plant-soil system and offsets the soil P consumption by P. australis + T. latifolia community. The impact of T. latifolia on soil P retention is enhanced with the increase in soil depth. The P reduction in the 0–15 cm soil layers in the mixed community was primarily due to the T. latifolia roots distributed mainly in the deep soils, which may result from the escape mechanisms adopted during the interspecific competition [32, 33], which makes it unable to offset P. australis P consumption in the surface soils.

It had been reported that spike, as a reproductive organ, had comparatively higher N and P content than other organs, because of the high level of mitochondria content. However, the N and P content in P. australis spikes were not significantly higher than that of other organs in our study. It is likely due to the Qin Lake wetland eutrophication that changed the ecological strategy of P. australis community, where they reduced the cost of reproduction but increased the plant growth input. Similarly, the stem N and P contents were also low in both P. australis and T. latifolia, which is reasonable because it is mainly used to transport water and nutrients, as well as to provide plants physical support [34]. However, the total N and P contents in stem and leaves were highest in both species. This can be explained by the highest efficiency of photosynthesis and evapotranspiration in summer, when proteins, nucleic acids, and chloroplast are synthesized and transported more efficiently in these organs than any other seasons [12]. On the other hand, a large quantity of P is necessary to meet the need of energy consumed in the photosynthesis and respiration [35].

N : P ratio has been known as an indicator of N or P limitation [36]. N : P < 14 suggests N limits plant growth, while P becomes the limiting factor when N : P > 16 [37]. The N : P ratios in plant organs in this study are significantly different from the global and national N : P ratios for terrestrial plants. It is noteworthy that the average N : P ratio in leaves was 68.9, which was remarkably higher than that of the global (13) and national (14) averages. High leaf N : P ratio is beneficial to the photosynthesis and further promotes plant growth [38, 39]. The high leaf N : P ratio in this study is mainly due to the fact that the N content (26.87 g/kg) in P. australis leaves is well above the average of terrestrial plant leaves in China (18.6 g/kg) and that the P content (0.39 g/kg and 0.19 g/kg) in P. australis and T. latifolia leaves is, conversely, well below the average of terrestrial plant leaves in China (1.21 g/kg) [40]. The whole evidence indicated that the Qin Lake eutrophication is likely due to the excess of N, because P, relative to N, is still in deficiency, implying that P is the limiting factor of the aquatic plant growth in this region. It also suggested that P. australis community not only failed to improve the P retention efficiency, but also expedited the soil P consumption.

Nutrients exchange and enrichment occurred mainly in the surface soils. The root biomass of P. australis is mainly distributed in the surface soil (0–30 cm), while its vertical distribution could reach the 60 cm of soil layer. The content of N and P was often higher in the surface soil than that in deep soil due to the fresh soil solution supply from eutrophic runoff [41] and higher concentration of N, P, and organic matters [42], which led to intensive sequestration of nutrient elements in soil-vegetation system [43]. Meanwhile, the utilization efficiency of plant roots for N and P in deep soil was depressed by the lack of oxygen caused by the long-term water saturation [44].

According to the seasonal dynamic of correlation between N and P contents in P. australis and soil, the N and P sequestration of the wetland soil benefited from the growth of aquatic plants [45], especially in summer when the plants were at the time of most vigorous growth. The N and P in the runoff would be absorbed by plants, and then feedback to the soil as fine root litters and root exudates [46]. Therefore, the N and P contents in P. australis and the surface soil with the densest distribution of roots had the highest correlation.

5. Conclusion

P. australis + T. latifolia community enhanced the efficiency of N enrichment in wetland soil and was the same to the P comparing to P. australis community. Nutrient enrichment efficiency varies with the season and soil depth. The highest N and P enrichment efficiencies of the plant communities occurred in summer in 0–15 cm soil layer, while the enrichment of P occurred uniformly in all vertical soil layer.


The authors thank the staff of Environmental Monitoring Station of Jiangyan, Jiangsu Province, China, for field assistance. This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (no. 2016YFC0502703), Forestry Industry Research Special Funds for Public Welfare Projects (no. 201404305), National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31270489), and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


1. Chorus I., Bartram J. Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water: A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring, and Management. London, UK: E & FN Spon; 1999. [Cross Ref]
2. Jin X.-C., Hu X.-Z. Concept and tactic of clean water runoff generation mechanism restoration in lake watershed. China Environmental Science. 2010;30(3):374–379.
3. Bengtsson L., Herschy R. W. Encyclopedia of lakes and reservoirs. Monographiae Biologicae. 2012;(53):10–26.
4. Granéli E., Weberg M., Salomon P. S. Harmful algal blooms of allelopathic microalgal species: the role of eutrophication. Harmful Algae. 2008;8(1):94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.011. [Cross Ref]
5. Wu S., Kuschk P., Brix H., Vymazal J., Dong R. Development of constructed wetlands in performance intensifications for wastewater treatment: a nitrogen and organic matter targeted review. Water Research. 2014;57:40–55. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.020. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Lyubenova L., Kuhn A. J., Höltkemeier A., Schröder P. Root exudation pattern of Typha latifolia L. plants after copper exposure. Plant and Soil. 2013;370(1-2):187–195. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1634-z. [Cross Ref]
7. Korboulewsky N., Wang R., Baldy V. Purification processes involved in sludge treatment by a vertical flow wetland system: focus on the role of the substrate and plants on N and P removal. Bioresource Technology. 2012;105:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.037. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Vymazal J. Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecological Engineering. 2005;25(5):478–490. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.010. [Cross Ref]
9. Vymazal J. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: five decades of experience. Environmental Science and Technology. 2011;45(1):61–69. doi: 10.1021/es101403q. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Kang S. G., Kwak Y. S., Hwangbo J. K. Management of slag dumping site by artificial floating vegetated island. RIST Journal of R & D. 2003;17(2):131–135.
11. Hubbard R. K. Emerging Environmental Technologies. Vol. 2. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 2010. Floating vegetated mats for improving surface water quality; pp. 211–244.
12. Li L., Zerbe S., Han W., et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of common reed (Phragmites australis) and its relationship to nutrient availability in northern China. Aquatic Botany. 2014;112:84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2013.08.002. [Cross Ref]
13. Miao S. Rhizome growth and nutrient resorption: mechanisms underlying the replacement of two clonal species in Florida Everglades. Aquatic Botany. 2004;78(1):55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2003.09.001. [Cross Ref]
14. Conley L. M., Dick R. I., Lion L. W. An assessment of the root zone method of wastewater treatment. Research Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation. 1991;63(3):239–247.
15. Batty L. C., Younger P. L. Effects of external iron concentration upon seedling growth and uptake of fe and phosphate by the common reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin ex. Steudel. Annals of Botany. 2003;92(6):801–806. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg205. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Brix H., Dyhr-Jensen K., Lorenzen B. Root-zone acidity and nitrogen source affects Typha latifolia L. growth and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2002;53(379):2441–2450. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erf106. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Xu Z. Z., Chu J. Z. In-depth development of wetland ecotourism—a case study of Qinhu Lake National Wetland Park. Wetland Science & Management. 2013;(3):22–25.
18. Feng J. M., Zhang H. R. Conservation and measures of Qin Lake wetland in Jiangyan. Pollution Control Technology. 2011;24(1):23–24.
19. Bremner J. M., Tabatabai M. A. Use of an ammonia electrode for determination of ammonium in kjeldahl analysis of soils. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis. 1972;3(2):159–165. doi: 10.1080/00103627209366361. [Cross Ref]
20. Murphy J., Riley J. P. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1962;27:31–36. doi: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)88444-5. [Cross Ref]
21. Ameel J. J., Axler R. P., Owen C. J. Persulfate digestion for determination of total nitrogen and phosphorus in low nutrient water. American Environmental Laboratory. 1993;10(93):1–11.
22. Yeh Y.-L., Chen T.-C. Application of grey correlation analysis for evaluating the artificial lake site in Pingtung Plain, Taiwan. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2004;31(1):56–64. doi: 10.1139/l03-074. [Cross Ref]
23. Brix H. Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Science and Technology. 1997;35(5):11–17. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00047-4. [Cross Ref]
24. Gumbricht T. Nutrient removal processes in freshwater submersed macrophyte systems. Ecological Engineering. 1993;2(1):1–30. doi: 10.1016/0925-8574(93)90024-A. [Cross Ref]
25. Gersberg R. M., Elkins B. V., Lyon S. R., Goldman C. R. Role of aquatic plants in wastewater treatment by artificial wetlands. Water Research. 1986;20(3):363–368. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(86)90085-0. [Cross Ref]
26. Chang N. B., Islam M. K., Wanielista M. P. Floating wetland mesocosm assessment of nutrient removal to reduce ecotoxicity in stormwater ponds. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2012;9(3):453–462. doi: 10.1007/s13762-012-0061-7. [Cross Ref]
27. Hubbard R. K., Gascho G. J., Newton G. L. Use of floating vegetation to remove nutrients from swine lagoon wastewater. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 2004;47(6):1963–1972. doi: 10.13031/2013.17809. [Cross Ref]
28. Yeh T. Y., Wu M. H., Cheng C. Y., et al. A study and analysis on the physical shading effect of water quality control in constructed wetlands. Journal of Civil Environmental Engineering. 2014;4(3, article no. 147)
29. Squires L., Van Der Valk A. G. Water-depth tolerances of the dominant emergent macrophytes of the Delta Marsh, Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Botany. 1992;70(9):1860–1867. doi: 10.1139/b92-230. [Cross Ref]
30. Debska A., Jóźwiakowski K., Gizińska-Górna M., et al. The efficiency of pollution removal from domestic wastewater in constructed wetland systems with vertical flow with common reed and glyceria maxima. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2015;16(5):110–118. doi: 10.12911/22998993/60464. [Cross Ref]
31. Hendrickson O. Q., Chatarpaul L., Burgess D. Nutrient cycling following whole-tree and conventional harvest in northern mixed forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 1989;19(6):725–735. doi: 10.1139/x89-112. [Cross Ref]
32. Weaver J. E., Himmel W. J. Relation of increased water content and decreased aeration to root development in hydrophytes. Plant Physiology. 1930;5(1):69–92. doi: 10.1104/pp.5.1.69. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Headley T. R., Huett D. O., Davison L. Seasonal variation in phosphorus removal processes within reed beds—mass balance investigations. Water Science and Technology. 2003;48(5):59–66. [PubMed]
34. Xing Y., Bubier J., Moore T., et al. The fate of 15N-nitrate in a northern peatland impacted by long term experimental nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization. Biogeochemistry. 2011;103(1):281–296. doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9463-0. [Cross Ref]
35. Terry N., Ulrich A. Effects of phosphorus deficiency on the photosynthesis and respiration of leaves of sugar beet. Plant Physiology. 1973;51(1):43–47. doi: 10.1104/pp.51.1.43. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Suttle C. A., Harrison P. J. Ammonium and phosphate uptake rates, N: P supply ratios, and evidence for N and P limitation in some oligotrophic lakes. Limnology and Oceanography. 1988;33(2):186–202. doi: 10.4319/lo.1988.33.2.0186. [Cross Ref]
37. Koerselman W., Meuleman A. F. M. The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology. 1996;33(6):1441–1450. doi: 10.2307/2404783. [Cross Ref]
38. Reich P. B., Oleksyn J., Wright I. J. Leaf phosphorus influences the photosynthesis-nitrogen relation: a cross-biome analysis of 314 species. Oecologia. 2009;160(2):207–212. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1291-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Reich P. B., Oleksyn J. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(30):11001–11006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403588101. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Han W., Fang J., Guo D., Zhang Y. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. New Phytologist. 2005;168(2):377–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01530.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Saeed T., Sun G. A review on nitrogen and organics removal mechanisms in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: dependency on environmental parameters, operating conditions and supporting media. Journal of Environmental Management. 2012;112:429–448. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.011. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Bai J., Wang Q., Deng W., Gao H., Tao W., Xiao R. Spatial and seasonal distribution of nitrogen in marsh soils of a typical floodplain wetland in Northeast China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2012;184(3):1253–1263. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2037-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Norkko J., Reed D. C., Timmermann K., et al. A welcome can of worms? Hypoxia mitigation by an invasive species. Global Change Biology. 2012;18(2):422–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02513.x. [Cross Ref]
44. Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Ambus P., Jensen E. S. Temporal and spatial distribution of roots and competition for nitrogen in pea-barley intercrops—a field study employing 32p technique. Plant and Soil. 2001;236(1):63–74. doi: 10.1023/a:1011909414400. [Cross Ref]
45. Juneau K. J., Tarasoff C. S. The seasonality of survival and subsequent growth of common reed (Phragmites australis) rhizome fragments. Invasive Plant Science and Management. 2013;6(1):79–86. doi: 10.1614/ipsm-d-12-00051.1. [Cross Ref]
46. Häggqvist K., Lindholm T. Phytoplankton dynamics in a shallow lake dominated by common water milfoil. Inland Waters. 2012;2(3):137–146. doi: 10.5268/IW-2.3.490. [Cross Ref]

Articles from Scientifica are provided here courtesy of Hindawi Limited