PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of peerjLatest ArticlesFor AuthorsEditorial BoardPeerJPeerJ
 
PeerJ. 2017; 5: e3061.
Published online 2017 March 1. doi:  10.7717/peerj.3061
PMCID: PMC5335688

Genetic and structural study of DNA-directed RNA polymerase II of Trypanosoma brucei, towards the designing of novel antiparasitic agents

Academic Editor: Pedro Silva

Abstract

Trypanosoma brucei brucei (TBB) belongs to the unicellular parasitic protozoa organisms, specifically to the Trypanosoma genus of the Trypanosomatidae class. A variety of different vertebrate species can be infected by TBB, including humans and animals. Under particular conditions, the TBB can be hosted by wild and domestic animals; therefore, an important reservoir of infection always remains available to transmit through tsetse flies. Although the TBB parasite is one of the leading causes of death in the most underdeveloped countries, to date there is neither vaccination available nor any drug against TBB infection. The subunit RPB1 of the TBB DNA-directed RNA polymerase II (DdRpII) constitutes an ideal target for the design of novel inhibitors, since it is instrumental role is vital for the parasite’s survival, proliferation, and transmission. A major goal of the described study is to provide insights for novel anti-TBB agents via a state-of-the-art drug discovery approach of the TBB DdRpII RPB1. In an attempt to understand the function and action mechanisms of this parasite enzyme related to its molecular structure, an in-depth evolutionary study has been conducted in parallel to the in silico molecular designing of the 3D enzyme model, based on state-of-the-art comparative modelling and molecular dynamics techniques. Based on the evolutionary studies results nine new invariant, first-time reported, highly conserved regions have been identified within the DdRpII family enzymes. Consequently, those patches have been examined both at the sequence and structural level and have been evaluated in regard to their pharmacological targeting appropriateness. Finally, the pharmacophore elucidation study enabled us to virtually in silico screen hundreds of compounds and evaluate their interaction capabilities with the enzyme. It was found that a series of chlorine-rich set of compounds were the optimal inhibitors for the TBB DdRpII RPB1 enzyme. All-in-all, herein we present a series of new sites on the TBB DdRpII RPB1 of high pharmacological interest, alongside the construction of the 3D model of the enzyme and the suggestion of a new in silico pharmacophore model for fast screening of potential inhibiting agents.

Keywords: Computational biology, Phylogenetic analysis, Homology modelling, Trypanosoma brucei brucei, DNA-directed RNA polymerase II, Structural models, Molecular dynamics

Introduction

African trypanosome parasites cause human sleeping sickness and nagana in Africa, Asia, and South America. More than 95% of reported cases are caused by two subspecies of Trypanosoma brucei brucei (TBB), the Trypanosoma brucei gambiense (TBG) and the Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense (TBR) which is found in western and central Africa (Berriman et al., 2005; World Health Organization, 2015). The parasitic infection is transmitted by tsetse flies, which breed in warm and humid areas. Tsetse flies are found living in 36 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, thus putting 60 million people at risk. Currently, about 10,000 new cases each year are reported by the World Health Organization (WHO). Moreover, it is believed that many cases are undiagnosed and unreported. Sleeping sickness can be curable with medication, but may be fatal if it is left untreated. It is estimated that human deaths caused by sleeping sickness are of about 48,000 annually. Bites by the tsetse fly erupt into a red sore on the skin, and in the following weeks the person may have to deal with several symptoms including fever, swollen lymph glands, aching muscles, headaches, and irritability. In advanced stages, the TBB parasite attacks the central nervous system of the host, and in general consul some disorders in personality, circadian rhythm, serenity, speech, and difficulties in walking. Despite the significant treatment advances for patients with sleeping sickness, the parasite’s progression is often inevitable and needs more treatment options. Until today, drugs can only be used in the early stages of the disease and without providing 100% reassurance for full convalesce of the patient (Ridley, 2002; Ross et al., 2007; Trouiller et al., 2002). The TBB parasite starts its activity after each invasion through its proteins, specifically with its replication enzymes including helicases and polymerases. Such enzymes are ideal targets for inhibitor design since those proteins are crucial for the TBB parasite survival. Being already in possession of the widely known sequence of the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II (DdRpII) RPB1 (Chung et al., 1993) which plays a significant role in the replication of the parasite, our primary goal is to suppress its function towards replication itself when it infects a human. Although TBB has been reported many times in the past, the three-dimensional structure of its essential enzymes like DdRpII remains unknown so far (Malvy & Chappuis, 2011).

Protein structure has been found to be three to ten times more conserved than sequence (Illergard, Ardell & Elofsson, 2009). Thus, when possible, it is preferable to study an enzyme’s 3D structure rather than its sequence. Knowledge of the tertiary structure can assist in the understanding of relationships between structure and function (Berg, Tymoczko & Stryer, 2002). Herein, the three-dimensional structure of DdRpII subunit RPB1 has been modelled, in an effort to predict the 3D molecular structure that is linked to the function of this enzyme (Bayele, 2009; Koch et al., 2016). Two molecular models have been constructed using conventional molecular modelling techniques and two different homolog 3D structures as templates. The established molecular models of the DdRpII RPB1 enzyme of TBB exhibits all known structural motifs that are unique to the DdRpII RPB1 enzymes.

Upon successful completion of the 3D structure prediction of the TBB DdRpII RPB1 protein, molecular dynamics simulations have been performed to structurally improve and benchmark the quality of the 3D models. Moreover, the reliability and viability of the TBB DdRpII RPB1 models were checked using several in silico scoring tools such as MOE and Procheck. After the model validation process, a de novo structure-based drug design approach has been performed based on two models, which led to the establishment of a 3D novel pharmacophore model that is highly specific for the DdRpII RPB1 enzyme of TBB. The generated pharmacophore model may be used in future experiments involving the high throughput virtual screening of large compound databases towards the identification of novel anti-TBB agents (Loukatou et al., 2014). The present work opens the field for the design of novel compounds with improved biochemical and clinical characteristics in the future.

Methods

Database sequence search

The full-length protein sequences related to the DdRpII family were extracted from the NCBI database. In total, 36 DdRpII protein sequences were downloaded from several species with fully sequenced genomes (Data S1).

Genetic and evolutionary analyses

Multiple sequence alignment of the DdRpII protein family sequences were performed using two different programs, MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004) and CLUSTALW (Chenna et al., 2003; Thompson, Higgins & Gibson, 1994). In the next step, multiple sequence alignment was checked with ProtTest3 (Darriba et al., 2011) to estimate the appropriate model of sequence evolution. Phylogenetic analyses were performed by two different ways, and two representative phylogenetic trees were constructed for the DdRpII dataset (Vlachakis et al., 2014b). The first phylogenetic tree was constructed using the MEGA software (Stecher et al., 2014) utilizing Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood statistical methods as described in with 100 bootstrap replicates (Fig. 1 and Data S2). The second phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Jalview software (Waterhouse et al., 2009) utilizing the neighbour joining statistical method in with 100 bootstrap replicates (Figs. S1 and Data S3).

Figure 1
Phylogenetic reconstruction of Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 protein sequences.

Conserved motifs exploration

The phylogenetic trees that derived from the phylogenetic analyses (Jalview and MEGA) were separated in sub-trees, in order to extract the most highly related protein sequences of the TBB DdRpII RPB1 family for the conserved motifs exploration (Fig. 2). The full-length amino acid sequences of the closely related proteins with the TPP DdRpII RPB1 protein were aligned using the CLUSTALW (Thompson, Higgins & Gibson, 1994) statistical method. The evolutionary conserved sequences motifs that were derived from the multiple sequence alignment were identified through the consensus sequence and logo graph where generated using Jalview (Waterhouse et al., 2009) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
Representative conserved motifs for the DdRpIIsubunit RPB1.

Molecular modelling

All calculations and visual constructions were performed using the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) version 2013.08 software package developed by Chemical Computing Group (Montreal, Canada) on a cloud-based multi-core High Performance Computing (HPC) cluster (Loukatou et al., 2014).

Identification of templates structures and sequence alignment

The amino acid sequence of the TBB DdRpII RPB1 was retrieved from the conceptual translation of the trypanosomal RNA polymerase largest subunit genes at the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot: P17545.1) (Das et al., 2006; Evers et al., 1989). The blastp algorithm (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was used to identify homologous structures by searching in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The multiple sequence alignment was performed using MOE (Vilar, Cozza & Moro, 2008).

Homology modelling

The homology modelling of the Tbb DdRPII RPB1 was carried out using MOE. The selection of template crystal structures for homology modelling was based on the primary sequence identity and similarity (Fig. 3, Figs. S2 and S3), and the crystal resolution (Nayeem, Sitkoff & Krystek, 2006). The crystal structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe DdRpII RPB1 (PDB: 3H0G) was used as template structure for the model A, while the crystal structure of Bos taurus DdRpII RPB1 (PDB: 5FLM) was used for building model B. The MOE homology model method is separated into four main steps. First, comes a primary fragment geometry specification. Second the insertion and deletions task. The third step is the loop selection and the side-chain packing, and the last step is the final model selection and refinement (Figs. 4 and and55 and Datas S4 and S5) (Papageorgiou et al., 2014; Vlachakis, Koumandou & Kossida, 2013). Subsequently, energy minimization was done in MOE initially using the Amber99 (Wang, Cieplak & Kollman, 2000) force-field as implemented into the same package. The energy minimization process was applied up to a gradient of 0.0001, in an effort to remove the geometrical strain (Vlachakis, Kontopoulos & Kossida, 2013).

Figure 3
Sequence alignment between the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 and the corresponding sequence of the crystal structure of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe DdRpII RPB1.
Figure 4
Model of the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1.
Figure 5
Structural superposition of the TBB DdRPII RPB1 models A and B.

Molecular electrostatic potential

Molecular electrostatic potential surfaces were calculated by solving the non-linear Poisson–Boltzmann equation using finite difference method as implemented into the MOE and PyMol Software (Seeliger & de Groot, 2010; Vilar, Cozza & Moro, 2008). The potential was calculated on solid points per side. Protein contact potential is an automated representation where the false red/blue charge-smoothed surface is shown on the protein (Fig. 4). Amber99 charges and atomic radii were used for this calculation.

Molecular dynamics

The Molecular Dynamics simulations of both TBB DdRPII RPB1 3D models A and B were executed in a periodic cell, which was explicitly solvated with simple point charge (SPC) water. The truncated octahedron box was chosen for solvating the models, with a set distance of 7 Å clear of the protein. The molecular dynamic simulations were conducted at 300 K, 1 atm with a set 2 second step size for a total of one hundred nanoseconds. For the purposes of this study we opted for a NVT ensemble in a canonical environment (Vlachakis et al., 2014a). NVT stands for Number of atoms, Volume, and Temperature that remain constant throughout the calculation (Vlachakis, 2009). The intricate zinc ions were included in the molecular dynamics simulations as integral parts of the modelled biological system (Chakravorty & Merz, 2014; Temiz, Benos & Camacho, 2010). However, due to the nature of the ions, we had to limit the allowed degrees of freedom for those molecules. Thus, the potential of the zinc ions was constrained in the three dimensional conformational space in the vicinity of the TBB DdRPII RPB1 3D models. The ions were prepositioned in the 3D models of TBB DdRPII RPB1, after structural superposition to the template X-ray structure. The models were structurally optimized and adjusted locally by subsequent energy minimizations, in an effort to eliminate any molecular clashes and minimize the constrain energy. A radius of 6 Å around each ion was given full degrees of freedom during the abovementioned structural optimizations. Provided that the TBB DdRPII RPB1 is a nucleotide processing enzyme, whose structure coordinates a repertoire of ions (e.g., Zinc, Mg + +), the AMBER99 forcefield was selected (Fig. 6). The AMBER99 forcefield is fully parameterized for our biological system as it implements ff10 parameters for amino acids and nucleic acids as well as EHT for small molecules, such as ions/cations at the same time (Vilar, Cozza & Moro, 2008). AM1-BCC charges were applied since the molecular system included the ion molecules. The results of the molecular dynamics simulations for both models were collected into a database by MOE for further analysis. The full simulation trajectories and molecular dynamics graphs for both models are presented in Fig. 7 and Figs. S4S7.

Figure 6
Zinc-finger formationsin the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 model.
Figure 7
Molecular dynamics simulationcharts for the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 models.

Model evaluation

The produced models were initially evaluated within the MOE package by a residue packing quality function, which depends on the number of buried non-polar side-chain groups and on hydrogen bonding. Moreover, the suite PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1996) was employed to further evaluate the quality of the produced models. Finally, MOE and its build in protein check module was used to evaluate whether the models of DdRpII RPB1 domains are similar to known protein structures of this family (Datas S6, S7 and S8).

Pharmacophore elucidation

A pharmacophoric feature characterizes a particular property and is not tied to a specific chemical structure; indeed different chemical groups may share the same property and so be represented by the same feature (Vlachakis, Kontopoulos & Kossida, 2013). It is thus a mistake to name as pharmacophoric features chemical functionalities such as guanidines or sulfonamides or typical structural skeletons such as flavones or steroids.

The term pharmacophore modeling refers to the generation of a pharmacophore hypothesis for the binding interactions in a particular active site (Vlachakis et al., 2015). Several different pharmacophore models for the same active site can be overlaid and reduced to their shared features so that common interactions are retained. Such a consensus pharmacophore can be considered as the largest common denominator shared by a set of active molecules.

In MOE, the computerized representation of a hypothesized pharmacophore is called a pharmacophore query. A MOE pharmacophore query is a set of query features that are typically created from ligand annotation points. Annotation points are markers in space that show the location and type of biologically important atoms and groups, such as hydrogen donors and acceptors, aromatic centers, projected positions of possible interaction partners or R-groups, charged groups, and bioisosteres. The annotation points on a ligand are the potential locations of the features that will constitute the pharmacophore query. Annotation points relevant to the pharmacophore are converted into query features with the addition of an extra parameter: a non-zero radius that encodes the permissible variation in the pharmacophore query’s geometry.

Once generated, a pharmacophore query can be used to screen virtual compound libraries for novel ligands. Pharmacophore queries can also be used to filter conformer databases, e.g., output from molecular docking runs, for biologically active conformations.

Results

Phylogenetic analysis

In the present study, two phylogenetic analyses of DdRpII family proteins in all available genomes, with putative full-length protein sequences were performed using two different statistical methods from the Jalview and MEGA software. Based on findings, putative members of the DdRpII family were identified in the Animalia, Fungi, Plantae, Protista and Chromalveolata kingdom major eukaryotic taxonomic division, as well as viruses (Fig. 1 and Fig. S1). In our analyses, in agreement with previous reports (Smith et al., 1989), we found that DdRpII family is split into two main subunits the RPB1 and the RPB2. The two subunits of the DdRpII family are clearly separated in the phylogenetic trees as two major sub-trees were obtained for each one of them (Fig. 1 and Fig. S1). The monophyletic sub-tree of the RPB1 subunit contains the TBB DdRpII RPB1, as well as another 17 leaves, which are related to RPB1 subunit. Furthermore, in the phylogenetic trees, the TBB DdRpII RBP1 forms a distinct monophyletic branch with the Euplotes octocarinatus DdRpII RPB1 and the Plasmodium falciparum DdRpII RPB1, which is basal to a clade that corresponds to other parasites. The Newick format of the phylogenetic trees is provided (Datas S1 and S2).

Conserved motifs exploration

Multiple sequence alignment of the DdRpII subunit RPB1 protein sequences from a variety of several species were included in the first sub-tree, highlights important conserved functional domains as described previously by Smith et al. (1989). Good conservation is evident throughout the whole length of the sequence, especially among species that belong to the same taxonomic division (Fig. 2).

In this study, an effort has been done to suggest motifs that were probably included in the DdRpII of the subunit RPB1. Regions conserved across all species (eukaryotic and viruses) are indicative of important functional domains of the DdRpII RPB1 enzyme. Finally, the consensus sequence of the multiple sequence alignment highlights nine conserved motifs which are conserved between all species. All of the conserved motifs identified here have not been reported previously, and indisputably deserve further study (Figs. 2 and and3).3). It is remarkable that all 18 polymerases, from the phylogenetic sub-tree of the subunit RPB1, have high identity score and remain undamaged during the evolution (Figs. 1 and and2).2). The highly conserved motifs in protein families are directly related to their active sites and functionality (Koonin & Galperin, 2003; Papageorgiou et al., 2016).

3D models A and B of the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1

Homologous solved 3D structures from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) have been identified from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) using the NCBI/BLASTp algorithm. Based on BLASTp report many 3D structures were determined suitable as templates for the homology modelling including the crystal structure of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe DdRpII RPB1 (PDB: 3H0G) (Spahr et al., 2009), the crystal structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DdRpII RPB1 (PDB: 4A3C and 1I3Q) (Cheung, Sainsbury & Cramer, 2011; Cramer, Bushnell & Kornberg, 2001), the electron microscopy structure Bos taurus DdRpII RPB1 (PDB: 5FLM) and the electron microscopy structure of the Human DdRpII RPB1 (PDB: 3J0K) (Bernecky et al., 2011). The final choice of a template structure was not only based on the percent sequence identity/similarity and the structure resolution, but also on the results of the phylogenetic trees. Two models were prepared. Model A was based on the Schizosaccharomyces pombe DdRpII RPB1 X-ray structure, while model B was based on the Bos taurus DdRpII RPB1 X-ray structure (Fig. 3). Although the Human DdRpII RPB1 could also be used to build the Trypanosoma brucei DdRpII RPB1 3D model, it was avoided in an effort to minimize potential toxicity issues during the drug design process. Nonetheless, the sequence of the Human DdRpII and the corresponding sequence of the Trypanosoma brucei and Bos taurus were aligned in an effort to identify sequence-based differences and/or similarities for the modelling and drug design process (Figs. S2). A multiple sequence alignment was constructed including the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 (NCBI: P17545.1) (Das et al., 2006), the Trypanosoma brucei gambiense DdRpII RPB1 (NCBI: XP_ 011773113.1) (Jackson et al., 2010), the crystal structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe DdRpII RPB1 (PDB: 3H0G A chain) (Spahr et al., 2009), the crystal structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DdRpII RPB1 (PDB: 1I3Q A chain) (Cramer, Bushnell & Kornberg, 2001), Bos taurus DdRpII RPB1 (PDB: 5FLM) (Bernecky et al., 2016). and the crystal structure of Human DdRpII RPB1 (PDB: 3J0K A chain) (Bernecky et al., 2011) towards to identify all the suggested conserved motifs within the highlighted domains of the RPB1 and the major sequences differences and similarities (Fig. S2).

The above-mentioned sequence alignments were used to identify all the nine canonical and conserved motifs as expected (Figs. 2 and and3).3). The model of TPP DdRpII was first structurally superimposed and subsequently structurally compared to its template using the MOE software (Fig. 4). The TPP DdRpII model exhibited an alpha-carbon RMSD lower than 1.3 angstroms (Fig. 5 and Data S8). Furthermore, the model was evaluated in regards to its geometry and its compatibility with the template structure using the build in protein check module of MOE (Data S8). These results, confirmed the structural viability of the 3D in silico model.

Comparison of the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1 model A and model B

It was decided to produce two models using the aforementioned template structures. Model A was build based on the Schizosaccharomyces pombe DdRpII RPB1 (PDB: 3H0G) X-ray structure and model B was based on the Bos taurus DdRpII RPB1 (PDB: 5FLM) structure. Bos taurus DdRPII RPB1 is a new released electron microscopy structure with 3.4 Å resolution, homolog to Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1. The sequence alignment between the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 and the Bos taurus DdRPII RPB1 template revealed 40% Identity and 56% similarity, same scores with the Schizosaccharomyces pombe DdRpII crystal structure, but the overall sequence alignment length was shorter than the Schizosaccharomyces pombe DdRpII crystal structure about 100 amino acids (Fig. S3). Furthermore, in the sequence alignment of the Trypanosoma brucei DdRpII RPB1 and Bos taurus DdRPII RPB1 all nine conserved motifs were identified, as expected. The root mean square deviation (RMSD) between model A and its template is 1.3 Å whereas the RMSD between model B and Bos taurus template is 2.7 Å. Nevertheless, the overall RMSD between the two models and the two templates isn’t bigger than 2,7 Å. (Fig. 5 and Data S8). Overall, we used to prepare in parallel a 3D model based on the Bos taurus structure as it bears better validation statistics and its sequence similarity to the Trypanosoma brucei brucei is higher. However, after performing another full course of MDs for model B, it was concluded that the added value of model B, when compared to model A is not significant, as models A and B are quite similar indeed (Fig. 7 and Figs. S4S7).

Discussion

Description of the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1 models

RNA Polymerase II is a multi-subunit enzyme that transcribes protein-coding genes in eukaryotes (Sentenac, 1985). Transcription in eukaryotes is dependent by three classes of nuclear RNA polymerases I–III. The genes encoding the largest subunits of eukaryotic RNA polymerases I, II and III have been isolated and are single copy genes, except Trypanosoma RNA polymerase II which contain two alleles (Smith et al., 1989). Structural and sequence differences between the two alleles are minor, but the C-terminal domain of those enzymes has a highly unusual structure. TBB DdRpII RPB1 model is the first protein subunit of the ten subunits multi-complex of RNA Polymerase II (Hahn, 2004; Suh et al., 2013). The RPB1 subunit is very critical in RNA polymerase formation and function. The RPB1 active site and the RPB2 hybrid-binding region combine in a single fold that forms the active centre of the RpII (Fig. 4). There are two metal ions at the RNA polymerase II active site. It has been previously reported that a Mg metal ion interacts with the three invariant aspartates of RPB1 (Cramer, Bushnell & Kornberg, 2001). The latter aspartate residues, which were found in all RPB1 sequences were aligned and fitted in a motifs exploration study. Consequently, those residues have now been marked as motif 4b in the TBB DdRpII RPB1 3D models.

The swinging motion of the clamp dictates the degree of opening of the cleft in DdRpII and permits the insertion of promoter DNA for the initiation of transcription (Suh et al., 2013). Based on previous studies, it is established that, upon closure of a transcribing complex, the RPB1 clamp serves as a multi-functional tool, sensing the DNA/RNA hybrid conformation and splitting DNA and RNA strands at the upstream end of the transcription complex (Cramer, Bushnell & Kornberg, 2001). The clamp is formed by N- and C-terminal regions of RPB1 and a part of the C-terminal region of RPB2 (Chen, Warfield & Hahn, 2007; Hahn, 2004; Li, Giles & Li, 2014). The clamp is primarily stabilized by three Zn ions within the RPB1 subunit (also marked in the TPP DdRpII RPB1) which forms zinc-finger conformations; two within the “clamp core” and one in the “clamp head”. Accordingly, two Zinc-finger formations were identified and highlighted in the TBB DdRpII RPB1 model (Fig. 6). The first formation can be recognized between a Zn ion and four cysteine residues in the suggested motif 1a, also known as CX(2)CXnCX2C/H (Das et al., 2006) (Fig. 3). Mutations in the first Zn-finger formation confer a lethal phenotype of RNA polymerase II (Donaldson & Friesen, 2000). The second Zinc-finger can be recognized in the next four cysteine residues (Figs. 3 and and6).6). In the proposed motif 1b, the first two cysteine residues were identified, which constitute part of the second Zing finger formation. Finally, according to our molecular dynamics simulations, the main role of the Rpb1 and Rpb2 subunits is to provide stability within the overall structure formation of the RNA polymerase II molecule in the 3D space.

3D Pharmacophore Elucidation

3D Pharmacophore design techniques take into account both the three-dimensional structures and binding modes of receptors and inhibitors towards identifying regions that are favorable or not for a particular receptor-inhibitor interaction (Vlachakis & Kossida, 2013). The description of the receptor-inhibitor interaction pattern is determined through a correlation between the specific properties of the inhibitors and their action on enzymatic activity (Balatsos et al., 2009; Vlachakis et al., 2012). The pharmacophore for TBB DdRpII RPB1 (Fig. 8) was based on structural information from the enzyme’s catalytic site including all steric and electronic features that are necessary to ensure optimal non-covalent interactions. The pharmacophoric features were investigated including positively or negatively ionized regions, hydrogen bond donors and acceptors, aromatic regions and hydrophobic areas. Firstly, there should be one electron-donating group in the proximity of the Ser1172 (colored green). The electron-donating region indicates a particular property of the inhibitor and is not necessarily confined to a specific chemical structure. Moreover, this interaction site may not strictly represent a hydrogen bond, but water or ion mediated bridges since the distance from the catalytic amino acids varies between 3–9 Å. An aromatic PAP (colored orange) was positioned in the proximity of Phe1179, which established pi-stacking interactions. Two electron accepting PAPs (colored red) were positioned in the proximity of the two Arginine residues (Arg1171 and Arg1203). Finally, a set of two adjacent PAPs were positioned in the center of the active site, where the Zn + + is coordinated in the crystal structure. Those yellow-colored PAPs are indicative of S-S bonds and bridges or even S-C interactions, following the Michael acceptor moiety pattern. The surrounding Cysteines are Cys1173, Cys1155, Cys1152, and Cys1270. However, the most important factor of the latter PAPs was the optimal positioning of these groups in the 3D conformational space of the TBB DdRpII RPB1 active site, rather than the amount of conjugation or interaction with the protein.

Figure 8
The 3D pharmacophore model for the Trypanosomabrucei brucei DdRPII RPB1 model.

Conclusion

The Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 enzyme was evolutionary analyzed, and nine new conserved motifs were identified. Using the X-ray crystal structure of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe DdRpII RPB1, the 3D model of the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 was designed using homology modelling techniques. The model was in silico evaluated and displayed high conservation of the functional domains previously reported in other DdRpII subunit RPB1 species. The Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 model structure provides a basis for interpretation of available data and the design of new experiments towards the Trypanosoma brucei brucei inhibition. Therefore, we propose the use of the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 model A as a pharmacological targeting platform for advanced, in silico drug design experiments using the novel findings of this study, both in the sequence and structural level. The 3D models and sequence datasets that derived from this study will be made available to the public in an effort to pave the way for fellow scientists of multidiscipline backgrounds to word in a synergic way towards the designing of novel anti-malarial agents with improved biochemical and clinical characteristics in the future.

Supplemental Information

10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-1

Figure S1

Phylogenetic reconstruction of Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1 model DdRpII RPB1 protein sequences:

The tree was generated using the DdRpII family dataset (36 foul length protein sequences samples) and the Jalview software. Tree was constructed using the average distance statistical method with PAM 250. In the tree representation there are clearly shown the two RNA polymerases II subunits RPB1 and RPB2 as two main monophyletic sub-trees. Trypanosoma brucei DdRpII RPB1 protein sequence was correctly classified in the monophyletic sub-tree of the RPB1 group.

10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-2

Figure S2

Multiple sequence alignment:

The alignment was performed using the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1, the Trypanosoma brucei gambiense DdRpII RPB1, the crystal structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe DdRpII RPB, the crystal structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DdRpII RPB1 and the electron microscopy structure of Human DdRpII DdRpII RPB1. (A) All nine suggested conserved motifs and major domains of DdRpII RPB1 have been marked (Motifs 1a, 1b, 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, 4a, 4b, 4c). Additionally, in the multiple sequence alignment were presented the major differences. (B) Domains and domainlike regions of the DdRpII subunit Rpb1. The amino acid residue numbers at the domain boundaries are indicated.

10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-3

Figure S3

Multiple sequence alignment:

The alignment was performed using the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1, the crystal structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe DdRpII RPB and the electron microscopy structure of Bos taurus DdRpII RPB1. All five sub-domains (A-E) as referred in Pfam database have been marked with different colours.

10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-4

Figure S4

Molecular dynamicssimulation charts of the root mean square deviation (RMSD) for the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 sub domainsof the model A:

The energy (Kcal/mol) vs time (ns) plot of the 100ns simulation trajectory of the TBB DdRpII RPBI model A. Sub-domain regions of the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1 have been separated according to conventions of Fig. S3. (A) Domain A RMSD. (B) Domain B RMSD. (C) Domain C RMSD. (D) Domain D RMSD. (E) Domain E RMSD.

10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-5

Figure S5

Molecular dynamics simulationcharts of the root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) for the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 sub domains of the model A:

Sub-domain regions of the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1 have been separated according to conventions of Fig. S3. (A) Domain A RMSF. (B) Domain B RMSF. (C) Domain C RMSF. (D) Domain D RMSF. (E) Domain E RMSF.

10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-6

Figure S6

Molecular dynamics simulationcharts of the root mean square deviation (RMSD) for the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 sub domainsof the model B:

The energy (Kcal/mol) vs time (ns) plot of the 100ns simulation trajectory of the TBB DdRpII RPBI model B. Sub-domain regions of the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1 have been separated according to conventions of Fig. S3. (A) Domain A RMSD. (B) Domain B RMSD. (C) Domain C RMSD. (D) Domain D RMSD. (E) Domain E RMSD.

10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-7

Figure S7

Molecular dynamics simulationcharts of the root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) for the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRpII RPB1 sub domains of the model B:

Sub-domain regions of the Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1 have been separated according to conventions of Fig. S3. (A) Domain A RMSF. (B) Domain B RMSF. (C) Domain C RMSF. (D) Domain D RMSF. (E) Domain E RMSF.

10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-8

Data S1

DdRPII related proteins dataset:
10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-9

Data S2

MEGA software phylogenetic tree in newick format:

The tree was constructed the Neighbour–Joining statistical method for 100 bootstrap replicates and the 36 extracted samples of the DpRpII.

10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-10

Data S3

Supplementary Data 3: Jalview software phylogenetic tree in newick format:

The tree was constructed using the average distances statistical method and the 36 extracted samples of the DpRpII.

10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-11

Data S4

Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1 model A in .pdb format:
10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-12

Data S5

Trypanosoma brucei brucei DdRPII RPB1 model B in .pdb format:
10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-13

Data S6

Protein structure report of the template:
10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-14

Data S7

Protein structure report of the model.
10.7717/peerj.3061/supp-15

Data S8

Protein structure report of the superposed models and templates:

Abbreviations

DdRpII
DNA-directed RNA polymerase II
TBB
Trypanosoma brucei brucei
TBG
Trypanosoma brucei gambiense
TBR
Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense
MOE
Molecular Operating Environment

Funding Statement

The authors received no funding for this work.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Louis Papageorgiou conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Vasileios Megalooikonomou analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Dimitrios Vlachakis conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as Supplementary Files.

References

Balatsos et al. (2009) Balatsos NA, Vlachakis D, Maragozidis P, Manta S, Anastasakis D, Kyritsis A, Vlassi M, Komiotis D, Stathopoulos C. Competitive inhibition of human poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN) by synthetic fluoro-pyranosyl nucleosides. Biochemistry. 2009;48:6044–6051. doi: 10.1021/bi900236k. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Bayele (2009) Bayele HK. Trypanosoma brucei: a putative RNA polymerase II promoter. Experimental Parasitology. 2009;123:313–318. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.08.007. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Berg, Tymoczko & Stryer (2002) Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L. Biochemistry. W.H. Freeman; New York: 2002.
Bernecky et al. (2011) Bernecky C, Grob P, Ebmeier CC, Nogales E, Taatjes DJ. Molecular architecture of the human Mediator-RNA polymerase II-TFIIF assembly. PLOS Biology. 2011;9(3):e1000603 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000603. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Bernecky et al. (2016) Bernecky C, Herzog F, Baumeister W, Plitzko JM, Cramer P. Structure of transcribing mammalian RNA polymerase II. Nature. 2016;529:551–554. doi: 10.1038/nature16482. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Berriman et al. (2005) Berriman M, Ghedin E, Hertz-Fowler C, Blandin G, Renauld H, Bartholomeu DC, Lennard NJ, Caler E, Hamlin NE, Haas B, Bohme U, Hannick L, Aslett MA, Shallom J, Marcello L, Hou L, Wickstead B, Alsmark UC, Arrowsmith C, Atkin RJ, Barron AJ, Bringaud F, Brooks K, Carrington M, Cherevach I, Chillingworth TJ, Churcher C, Clark LN, Corton CH, Cronin A, Davies RM, Doggett J, Djikeng A, Feldblyum T, Field MC, Fraser A, Goodhead I, Hance Z, Harper D, Harris BR, Hauser H, Hostetler J, Ivens A, Jagels K, Johnson D, Johnson J, Jones K, Kerhornou AX, Koo H, Larke N, Landfear S, Larkin C, Leech V, Line A, Lord A, Macleod A, Mooney PJ, Moule S, Martin DM, Morgan GW, Mungall K, Norbertczak H, Ormond D, Pai G, Peacock CS, Peterson J, Quail MA, Rabbinowitsch E, Rajandream MA, Reitter C, Salzberg SL, Sanders M, Schobel S, Sharp S, Simmonds M, Simpson AJ, Tallon L, Turner CM, Tait A, Tivey AR, Van Aken S, Walker D, Wanless D, Wang S, White B, White O, Whitehead S, Woodward J, Wortman J, Adams MD, Embley TM, Gull K, Ullu E, Barry JD, Fairlamb AH, Opperdoes F, Barrell BG, Donelson JE, Hall N, Fraser CM, Melville SE, El-Sayed NM. The genome of the African trypanosome Trypanosoma brucei. Science. 2005;309:416–422. doi: 10.1126/science.1112642. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Chakravorty & Merz (2014) Chakravorty DK, Merz KM. Studying allosteric regulation in metal sensor proteins using computational methods. Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology. 2014;96:181–218. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2014.06.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Chen, Warfield & Hahn (2007) Chen HT, Warfield L, Hahn S. The positions of TFIIF and TFIIE in the RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2007;14:696–703. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1272. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Chenna et al. (2003) Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T, Lopez R, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG, Thompson JD. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003;31:3497–3500. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg500. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Cheung, Sainsbury & Cramer (2011) Cheung AC, Sainsbury S, Cramer P. Structural basis of initialRNA polymerase II transcription. EMBO Journal. 2011;30:4755–4763. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.396. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Chung et al. (1993) Chung HM, Lee MG, Dietrich P, Huang J, Van der Ploeg LH. Disruption of largest subunit RNA polymerase II genes in Trypanosoma brucei. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 1993;13:3734–3743. doi: 10.1128/MCB.13.6.3734. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Cramer, Bushnell & Kornberg (2001) Cramer P, Bushnell DA, Kornberg RD. Structural basis of transcription: RNA polymerase II at 2.8 angstrom resolution. Science. 2001;292:1863–1876. doi: 10.1126/science.1059493. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Darriba et al. (2011) Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1164–1165. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr088. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Das et al. (2006) Das A, Li H, Liu T, Bellofatto V. Biochemical characterization of Trypanosoma brucei RNA polymerase II. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 2006;150:201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.08.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Donaldson & Friesen (2000) Donaldson IM, Friesen JD. Zinc stoichiometry of yeast RNA polymerase II and characterization of mutations in the zinc-binding domain of the largest subunit. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275:13780–13788. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.18.13780. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Edgar (2004) Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Evers et al. (1989) Evers R, Hammer A, Kock J, Jess W, Borst P, Memet S, Cornelissen AW. Trypanosoma brucei contains two RNA polymerase II largest subunit genes with an altered C-terminal domain. Cell. 1989;56:585–597. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90581-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Hahn (2004) Hahn S. Structure and mechanism of the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2004;11:394–403. doi: 10.1038/nsmb763. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Illergard, Ardell & Elofsson (2009) Illergard K, Ardell DH, Elofsson A. Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence–a study of structural response in protein cores. Proteins. 2009;77:499–508. doi: 10.1002/prot.22458. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Jackson et al. (2010) Jackson AP, Sanders M, Berry A, McQuillan J, Aslett MA, Quail MA, Chukualim B, Capewell P, Macleod A, Melville SE, Gibson W, Barry JD, Berriman M, Hertz-Fowler C. The genome sequence of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, causative agent of chronic human african trypanosomiasis. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2010;4:e658 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000658. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Koch et al. (2016) Koch H, Raabe M, Urlaub H, Bindereif A, Preusser C. The polyadenylation complex of Trypanosoma brucei: characterization of the functional poly(A) polymerase. RNA Biology. 2016;13:221–231. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2015.1130208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Koonin & Galperin (2003) Koonin EV, Galperin MY. Sequence—evolution—function: computational approaches in comparative genomics. Kluwer Academic; Boston: 2003. [PubMed]
Laskowski et al. (1996) Laskowski RA, Rullmannn JA, MacArthur MW, Kaptein R, Thornton JM. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 1996;8:477–486. [PubMed]
Li, Giles & Li (2014) Li W, Giles C, Li S. Insights into how Spt5 functions in transcription elongation and repressing transcription coupled DNA repair. Nucleic Acids Research. 2014;42:7069–7083. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku333. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Loukatou et al. (2014) Loukatou S, Papageorgiou L, Fakourelis P, Filntisi A, Polychronidou E, Bassis I, Megalooikonomou V, Makalowski W, Vlachakis D, Kossida S. Molecular dynamics simulations through GPU video games technologies. Journal of Molecular Biochemistry. 2014;3:64–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Malvy & Chappuis (2011) Malvy D, Chappuis F. Sleeping sickness. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2011;17:986–995. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03536.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Nayeem, Sitkoff & Krystek (2006) Nayeem A, Sitkoff D, Krystek S. A comparative study of available software for high-accuracy homology modeling: from sequence alignments to structural models. Protein Science. 2006;15:808–824. doi: 10.1110/ps.051892906. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Papageorgiou et al. (2014) Papageorgiou L, Loukatou S, Koumandou VL, Makalowski W, Megalooikonomou V, Vlachakis D, Kossida S. Structural models for the design of novel antiviral agents against Greek Goat Encephalitis. PeerJ. 2014;2:e664 doi: 10.7717/peerj.664. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Papageorgiou et al. (2016) Papageorgiou L, Loukatou S, Kossida S, Maroulis D, Vlachakis D. An updated evolutionary study of Flaviviridae NS3 helicase and NS5 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase reveals novel invariable motifs as potential pharmacological targets. Molecular BioSystems. 2016;12(7):2080–2093. doi: 10.1039/c5mb00706b. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Ridley (2002) Ridley RG. Medical need, scientific opportunity and the drive for antimalarial drugs. Nature. 2002;415:686–693. doi: 10.1038/415686a. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Ross et al. (2007) Ross L, Lim ML, Liao Q, Wine B, Rodriguez AE, Weinberg W, Shaefer M. Prevalence of antiretroviral drug resistance and resistance-associated mutations in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-infected individuals from 40 United States cities. HIV Clinical Trials. 2007;8:1–8. doi: 10.1310/hct0801-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Seeliger & de Groot (2010) Seeliger D, De Groot BL. Ligand docking and binding siteanalysis with PyMOL and Autodock/Vina. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 2010;24:417–422. doi: 10.1007/s10822-010-9352-6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Sentenac (1985) Sentenac A. Eukaryotic RNA polymerases. CRC Critical Reviews in Biochemistry. 1985;18:31–90. [PubMed]
Smith et al. (1989) Smith JL, Levin JR, Ingles CJ, Agabian N. In trypanosomes thehomolog of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II is encoded by twogenes and has a highly unusual C-terminal domain structure. Cell. 1989;56:815–827. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90686-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Spahr et al. (2009) Spahr H, Calero G, Bushnell DA, Kornberg RD. Schizosacharomyces pombe RNA polymerase II at 3.6-Aresolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:9185–9190. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903361106. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Stecher et al. (2014) Stecher G, Liu L, Sanderford M, Peterson D, Tamura K, Kumar S. MEGA-MD: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software withmutational diagnosis of amino acid variation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1305–1307. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu018. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Suh et al. (2013) Suh H, Hazelbaker DZ, Soares LM, Buratowski S. The C-terminal domain of Rpb1 functions on other RNA polymerase II subunits. Molecular Cell. 2013;51:850–858. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.015. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Temiz, Benos & Camacho (2010) Temiz AN, Benos PV, Camacho CJ. Electrostatic hot spot on DNA-binding domains mediates phosphate desolvation and the pre-organization of specificity determinant side chains. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010;38:2134–2144. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1132. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Thompson, Higgins & Gibson (1994) Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research. 1994;22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Trouiller et al. (2002) Trouiller P, Olliaro P, Torreele E, Orbinski J, Laing R, Ford N. Drug development for neglected diseases: a deficient market anda public-health policy failure. Lancet. 2002;359:2188–2194. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09096-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Vilar, Cozza & Moro (2008) Vilar S, Cozza G, Moro S. Medicinal chemistry and the molecular operating environment (MOE): application of QSAR and molecular docking to drug discovery. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 2008;8:1555–1572. doi: 10.2174/156802608786786624. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Vlachakis (2009) Vlachakis D. Theoretical study of the Usutu virus helicase 3D structure, by means of computer-aided homology modelling. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling. 2009;6:9 doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-6-9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Vlachakis et al. (2014a) Vlachakis D, Bencurova E, Papangelopoulos N, Kossida S. Current state-of-the-art molecular dynamics methods and applications. Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology. 2014a;94:269–313. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800168-4.00007-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Vlachakis et al. (2015) Vlachakis D, Fakourelis P, Megalooikonomou V, Makris C, Kossida S. DrugOn: a fully integrated pharmacophore modeling and structure optimization toolkit. PeerJ. 2015;3:e725 doi: 10.7717/peerj.725. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Vlachakis, Kontopoulos & Kossida (2013) Vlachakis D, Kontopoulos DG, Kossida S. Space constrained homology modelling: the paradigm of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of dengue (Type II) virus. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2013;2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/108910. 108910. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Vlachakis & Kossida (2013) Vlachakis D, Kossida S. Molecular modeling and pharmacophore elucidation study of the Classical Swine Fever virus helicase as apromising pharmacological target. PeerJ. 2013;1:e85 doi: 10.7717/peerj.85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Vlachakis, Koumandou & Kossida (2013b) Vlachakis D, Koumandou VL, Kossida S. A holistic evolutionary and structural study of flaviviridae provides insights into the function and inhibition of HCV helicase. PeerJ. 2013b;1:e74 doi: 10.7717/peerj.74. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Vlachakis et al. (2014b) Vlachakis D, Pavlopoulou A, Roubelakis MG, Feidakis C, Anagnou NP, Kossida S. 3D molecular modeling and evolutionary study of the Trypanosoma brucei DNA Topoisomerase IB, as a new emerging pharmacological target. Genomics. 2014b;103:107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2013.11.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Vlachakis et al. (2012) Vlachakis D, Pavlopoulou A, Tsiliki G, Komiotis D, Stathopoulos C, Balatsos NA, Kossida S. An integrated in silico approach to design specific inhibitors targeting human poly(a)-specific ribonuclease. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(12):e51113 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Wang, Cieplak & Kollman (2000) Wang J, Cieplak P, Kollman P. How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (resp) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2000;21:1049–1071. doi: 10.1002/1096-987X(200009)21:12<1049::AID-JCC3>3.0.CO;2-F. [Cross Ref]
Waterhouse et al. (2009) Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DM, Clamp M, Barton GJ. Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1189–1191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
World Health Organization (2015) World Health Organization Human African Trypanosomiasis. http://www.who.int/trypanosomiasis_african/en/ 2015

Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc