PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of genannJournal InfoAuthorsPermissionsJournals.ASM.orggenomeA ArticleGenome Announcements
 
Genome Announc. 2017 March; 5(9): e01630-16.
Published online 2017 March 2. doi:  10.1128/genomeA.01630-16
PMCID: PMC5334578

Genome Sequence of Enterovirus D68 from St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 2016

ABSTRACT

Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) was rarely observed prior to a widespread outbreak in 2014. We observed its reemergence in St. Louis in 2016 and sequenced the EV-D68 genomes from two patient samples. The 2016 viruses in St. Louis differed from those we had sequenced from the 2014 outbreak but were similar to other viruses circulating nationally in 2016.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is a member of the family Picornaviridae, which are positive sense RNA viruses. This virus was first described in 1962 but remained rare until 2014 when a widespread, global outbreak occurred (1). In 2014, we sequenced strains circulating in St. Louis (2) and developed a rapid assay that could be used for EV-D68 surveillance (3). Using this assay to test a subset of enterovirus/rhinovirus-positive respiratory samples from the Clinical Virology Laboratory at St. Louis Children’s Hospital, we found that EV-D68 reemerged in 2016. This is consistent with surveillance carried out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which did not detect EV-D68 in the 700 samples they tested in 2015 but detected it sporadically in 2016 (http://www.cdc.gov/non-polio-enterovirus/about/EV-D68.html). We selected two samples for genome sequence analysis.

Total nucleic acid was extracted using the NucliSENS easyMAG automated system (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and treated with DNase. RNA was reverse transcribed, the second strand was synthesized, and resulting cDNA was amplified as previously described (4, 5). Dual-indexed sequencing libraries were constructed using the Accel NGS 2S kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Swift Biosciences, Ann Arbor, MI). The two sequencing libraries were pooled, and viral nucleic acid was enriched using targeted sequence capture with ViroCap (6). Enriched nucleic acids were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq instrument, generating 2 × 150 bp paired-end sequences (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). Primer and Illumina adapter sequences were trimmed with Flexbar (7). Sequences were assembled using IDBA-UD (8), individual sequences were aligned back to the assembly using BWA mem (9), and contigs and aligned sequence reads were visualized using Tablet (10). Contig sequences were manually reviewed and improved. Genomes were annotated with VIGOR (11, 12).

The two St. Louis viruses showed greater than 99% nucleic acid and predicted amino acid sequence identity to each other and to other 2016 strains that had been deposited into GenBank as of 20 October 2016. The St. Louis viruses, which were from patients with respiratory symptoms, had greater than 99% sequence identity to viruses from patients with acute flaccid paralysis submitted to GenBank in August 2016 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (accession numbers KX675261 and KX625262). The 2016 St. Louis viruses shared only 96% nucleotide sequence identity with the 2014 St. Louis virus, and phylogenetic analysis indicated that the 2016 virus in St. Louis did not derive from the 2014 viruses.

When we sequenced the St. Louis virus in 2014, only seven whole-genome sequences and five additional complete coding sequences were available in GenBank. On 20 October 2016, there were 285 whole-genome or complete coding sequences available. The deposition of genome sequences and metadata including geographic location and associated clinical features will help to increase our understanding of EV-D68 and its patholepidemiology.

Accession number(s).

This project has been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KY292525 and KY292526. The versions described in this paper are the first versions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Maria Cannella, Brandi Herter, Richard Buller, the Clinical Virology Laboratory at St. Louis Children’s Hospital, and the McDonnell Genome Institute for their support in obtaining and sequencing samples. The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

This research was supported by funds from the Department of Pediatrics. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Footnotes

Citation Wylie KM, Wylie TN, Storch GA. 2017. Genome sequence of enterovirus D68 from St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 2016. Genome Announc 5:e01630-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01630-16.

REFERENCES

1. Holm-Hansen CC, Midgley SE, Fischer TK 2016. Global emergence of enterovirus D68: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 16:e64–e75. doi:.10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00543-5 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Wylie KM, Wylie TN, Orvedahl A, Buller RS, Herter BN, Magrini V, Wilson RK, Storch GA 2015. Genome sequence of enterovirus D68 from St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 21:184–186. doi:.10.3201/eid2101.141605 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Wylie TN, Wylie KM, Buller RS, Cannella M, Storch GA 2015. Development and evaluation of an enterovirus D68 real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 53:2641–2647. doi:.10.1128/JCM.00923-15 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Wang D, Coscoy L, Zylberberg M, Avila PC, Boushey HA, Ganem D, DeRisi JL 2002. Microarray-based detection and genotyping of viral pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:15687–15692. doi:.10.1073/pnas.242579699 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Wang D, Urisman A, Liu YT, Springer M, Ksiazek TG, Erdman DD, Mardis ER, Hickenbotham M, Magrini V, Eldred J, Latreille JP, Wilson RK, Ganem D, DeRisi JL 2003. Viral discovery and sequence recovery using DNA microarrays. PLoS Biol 1:E2. doi:.10.1371/journal.pbio.0000002 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Wylie TN, Wylie KM, Herter BN, Storch GA 2015. Enhanced virome sequencing using targeted sequence capture. Genome Res 25:1910–1920. doi:.10.1101/gr.191049.115 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Dodt M, Roehr JT, Ahmed R, Dieterich C 2012. FLEXBAR-Flexible barcode and adapter processing for next-generation sequencing platforms. Biology (Basel) 1:895–905. doi:.10.3390/biology1030895 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL 2012. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28:1420–1428. doi:.10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Li H, Durbin R 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. doi:.10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Milne I, Stephen G, Bayer M, Cock PJA, Pritchard L, Cardle L, Shaw PD, Marshall D 2013. Using Tablet for visual exploration of second-generation sequencing data. Brief Bioinform 14:193–202. doi:.10.1093/bib/bbs012 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Wang S, Sundaram JP, Spiro D 2010. VIGOR, an annotation program for small viral genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 11:451. doi:.10.1186/1471-2105-11-451 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Wang S, Sundaram JP, Stockwell TB 2012. VIGOR extended to annotate genomes for additional 12 different viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 40:W186–W192. doi:.10.1093/nar/gks528 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)