PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brainsciMDPIHomeThis articleThis journalInstructions for authorsSubscribeBrain Sciences
 
Brain Sci. 2017 February; 7(2): 21.
Published online 2017 February 17. doi:  10.3390/brainsci7020021
PMCID: PMC5332964

Diffusion Assessment of Cortical Changes, Induced by Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Raymond J. Grill, Academic Editor

Abstract

Promising treatments are being developed to promote functional recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI). Magnetic resonance imaging, specifically Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) has been shown to non-invasively measure both axonal and myelin integrity following traumatic brain and SCI. A novel data-driven model-selection algorithm known as Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging (DBSI) has been proposed to more accurately delineate white matter injury. The objective of this study was to investigate whether DTI/DBSI changes that extend to level of the cerebral peduncle and internal capsule following a SCI could be correlated with clinical function. A prospective non-randomized cohort of 23 patients with chronic spinal cord injuries and 17 control subjects underwent cranial diffusion weighted imaging, followed by whole brain DTI and DBSI computations. Region-based analyses were performed on cerebral peduncle and internal capsule. Three subgroups of patients were included in the region-based analysis. Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) was also applied to allow whole-brain white matter analysis between controls and all patients. Functional assessments were made using International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) as modified by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Scale. Whole brain white matter analysis using TBSS finds no statistical difference between controls and all patients. Only cervical ASIA A/B patients in cerebral peduncle showed differences from controls in DTI and DBSI results with region-based analysis. Cervical ASIA A/B SCI patients had higher levels of axonal injury and edema/tissue loss as measured by DBSI at the level of the cerebral peduncle. DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA), Axial Diffusivity (AD) and Radial Diffusivity (RD) was able to detect differences in cervical ASIA A/B patients, but were non-specific to pathologies. Increased water fraction indicated by DBSI non-restricted isotropic diffusion fraction in the cerebral peduncle, explains the simultaneously increased DTI AD and DTI RD values. Our results further demonstrate the utility of DTI to detect disruption in axonal integrity in white matter, yet a clear shortcoming in differentiating true axonal injury from inflammation/tissue loss. Our results suggest a preservation of axonal integrity at the cortical level and has implications for future regenerative clinical trials.

Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, diffusion basis spectrum imaging, spinal cord injury

1. Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a significant public health problem. Currently, 253,000 people in the United States are living with SCI, while 11,000 Americans are hospitalized for SCI each year [1]. Annually, $9.7 billion dollars are being spent on SCI research and patient care. A major shortcoming limiting efforts to improve the treatment of SCI is the lack of quantifiable metrics on which to base clinical decisions. Biomarkers are emerging in many fields as valuable predictors of a patient’s clinical course and response to therapy. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been demonstrated to noninvasively reflect the progression of white matter tract damage in SCI through characterizing water molecule diffusion [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The white matter of the central nervous system is highly ordered and has a coherent structure in which water diffusivity parallel to the fibers (axial diffusivity—AD) is greater than the diffusivity perpendicular to the fibers (radial diffusivity—RD). Changes in these directional diffusivities reflect white matter integrity and the underlying pathology [9,10,11,12]. Specifically, demyelination results in an increased RD, presumably due to the loss or disruption of myelin membrane integrity that hinders water diffusion perpendicular to axonal tracts [11,13,14]. In contrast, axonal injury leads to decreased AD levels [10,11,15].

In acute SCI, axonal loss, demyelination, edema, and cellular inflammation are all prevalent; and contribute to observed functional disability. In chronic SCI, cellular inflammation and edema are assumed to be less relevant, while axon and myelin loss are thought to be the primary substrate of functional disability. The neurological impairment of SCI patients may appear clinically similar while the underlying pathological profile may differ. Early axonal injury potentially leads to permanent disability, and may result in neurological impairment comparable with that from inflammation with minimal axonal damage, potentially reversible when inflammation or edema subsides. Early neurological impairment alone is thus not sufficient to predict the long-term outcome of a SCI patient.

While providing a valuable tool to assess white matter integrity, unfortunately it is now recognized that DTI loses specificity and sensitivity with increasing pathological and anatomical complexity [4,16,17]. Thus the prediction of long-term outcome using DTI remains uncertain. To overcome factors confounding DTI analysis, we have utilized diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) [4], to more accurately differentiate and quantify axonal injury, demyelination, inflammation and edema/tissue loss. While an increasing volume of work has been done utilizing DTI in traumatic brain injury, SCI, and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) it remains unclear whether brainstem and higher white matter tracts represent a useful predictor of clinical function following SCI. Furthermore, it is unclear what—if any—permanent cortical axonal loss occurs following a traumatic SCI. Recent work has demonstrated at least at the level of the spinal cord, FA values rostral to the site of injury correlate with clinical function in acute SCI [18]. We hypothesized DTI and DBSI metrics of the brainstem and internal capsule would also represent a useful predictor of clinical function in chronic SCI patients.

2. Materials and Methods

The Washington University Human Research Protection Office/Institutional Review Board and the Saint Louis University Institutional Review Board approved this cross-sectional study, and all subjects provided written informed consent. A prospective non-randomized cohort of 23 SCI patients and 17 control subjects underwent Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) over a 12-month period. DTI and DBSI analyses were performed on whole brain diffusion weighted images. DTI and DBSI-derived indices from the internal capsule (IC) and cerebral peduncle (CP) were obtained. Clinical grading of patient functional status was made with international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (ISNCSCI) [19] as modified by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Scale.

2.1. DTI/DBSI Image Acquisition

Magnetic resonance images were acquired using a 3 T scanner (Trio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a single-shot diffusion weighted Spin-Echo Echo Planar Imaging (SE-EPI) sequence with the following parameters: Repetition Time (TR) = 10,000 ms; Echo Time (TE) = 120 ms; Field of View (FOV) = 256 × 256 mm2; acquisition matrix = 128 × 128; slice thickness = 2 mm; in-plane resolution = 2 × 2 × 2 mm3; acquisition time = 15 min. Diffusion weighted images were acquired in the axial plane covering the whole brain. As listed in Table A1 of Appendix A, a total 99 diffusion-encoding directions were selected as prescribed in diffusion spectrum imaging where the position vectors are the entire grid points (qx, qy, qz) over the 3D q-space under the relationship that (qx2 + qy2 + qz2) ≤ r2 (r = 3 used in current study). There were nine distinct b values distributed from 0 to 2000 s/mm2 on the uniformly spaced Cartesian grid (0/200/450/650/900/1100/1350/1800/2000 s/mm2) [20,21,22]. Eddy current and motion artifacts of Diffusion Weight Image (DWI) images were corrected, then susceptibility-induced off-resonance field was estimated and corrected using TOPUP in FMRIB Software Library (FSL) [23]. Images from all subjects were registered to standard JHU-DTI-MNI single-subject atlas (also known as the “Eve Atlas” [24]). DTI and DBSI post-processing were conducted using software developed at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology of Washington University in St. Louis. Standard Regions of Interest (ROIs) of CP and IC for each participant were selected based on the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) MNI template White Matter Parcellation Map (WMPM). Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis of group difference.

2.2. Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging (DBSI)

DBSI [4] analyzed the diffusion MRI signals as a linear combination of multiple anisotropic (representing crossing myelinated and unmyelinated axons of varied directions; the first term) and a spectrum of isotropic (resulting from cells, sub-cellular structure, and edematous water; the second term) diffusion tensors according to Equation (1):

Sk=i=1NAnisofie|bk|λie|bk|(λiλi)cos2ψik+abf(D)e|bk|DdD (k=1, 2, 3,) 
(1)

where Sk and |bk| are the signal and b-value of the kth diffusion gradient, NAniso is the number of anisotropic tensors (fiber tracts), Ψik is the angle between the kth diffusion gradient and the principal direction of the ith anisotropic tensor, λ||i and λi are the axial and radial diffusivities of the ith anisotropic tensor, fi is the signal intensity fraction for the ith anisotropic tensor, and a and b are the low and high diffusivity limits for the isotropic diffusion spectrum (reflecting cellularity and edema) f(D) [4]. Since all pathology markers are derived using a single diffusion-weighted MRI data set in DBSI, naturally co-registered, the inherently quantitative relationship among all DBSI metrics enables the quantification of each pathological component.

2.3. Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS)

The whole brain voxel-wise analysis of DTI and DBSI were carried out using Tract Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) [25], part of FSL [26]. Due to the limited number of patients, TBSS was only applied between controls and all SCI patients. First, FA images were created by fitting a tensor model to the raw diffusion data using FSL’s Diffusion toolbox (FDT), and then brain-extracted using a brain extraction tool (BET) of FSL [27]. Participants’ FA data were aligned into a 1 × 1 × 1 mm3 MNI152 space (a normalized/averaged brain developed by the Montreal Neurological Institute) by using the nonlinear registration tool FNIRT [28,29], which uses a b-spline representation of the registration warp field [30]. Next, the mean FA image was then created and thinned to create a mean FA skeleton that represents the centers of all tracts common to the group. DTI and DBSI indices were projected onto this skeleton for statistical analyses. Nonparametric permutation tests were used for voxel-wise statistical analysis of the FA skeletons between health controls and SCI patients. The significance threshold for group differences was set at p < 0.05. Thresholding was corrected for multiple comparisons across voxels by using the threshold-free cluster-enhancement option of the tool RANDOMIZE in FSL [31].

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

The mean age at the time of imaging for patients was 41 years (range 15–66 and 39 for controls (range 19–68). Patient demographics are summarized in Table 1. Months since injury ranged from 1 month to 480 months. All patients with an ASIA A or B injury were at least six months out from their injury (average 103 months, range 11–480 months). We attempted to include a heterogeneous patient population reflecting various levels and severity of injury. Patients and controls were not directly age matched, but the final demographic distributions were similar in all measured parameters for all cohorts. The most common causes of injury were falls, followed by motor vehicle collisions.

Table 1
Patient Demographics.

3.2. DTI Results

As depicted in Figure 1 and Table 2, DTI indices (FA, AD, and RD) from ASIA-A/B patients are different from controls only in CP region. FA values were significantly lower at the level of CP. In contrast, RD and AD values were both elevated at the level of the CP as compared to normal controls.

Figure 1
Compared to controls, DTI FA (A); AD (B) and RD (C) for Cervical ASIA-A/B demonstrated decreased FA and increased AD/RD in cerebral peduncle (CP) and internal capsule (IC). * p < 0.05. DTI—Diffusion Tensor Imaging, FA—Fractional ...
Table 2
DTI Results–Brainstem and internal capsule.

3.3. DBSI Results

As demonstrated in Figure 2 and Table 3, DBSI showed decreased FA values in the CP from cervical ASIA D to ASIA A/B, but not as reach significance as with DTI. AD values of ASIA A/B patients were significantly lower in CP, while RD values not different, compared to controls. In contrast to DTI, edema/tissue loss can be accounted for with DBSI measures. As depicted in Figure 3, increased non-restricted fraction in the CP contributed to the elevations of both DTI AD and RD, which also explains the over-estimated DTI FA drop in CP.

Figure 2
DBSI FA (A) and DBSI AD (B) and RD (C) values of Control, Cervical ASIA-A/B, Thoracic ASIA-A/B/C/D patients. Cervical ASIA-A/B patients had significantly lower DBSI AD values compared to controls and Cervical ASIA-D patients at the level of the cerebral ...
Figure 3
Compared to controls, DBSI derived non-restricted fraction at the level of the cerebral peduncle and internal capsule increase for cervical ASIA-A/B patients. DBSI—Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging, FA—Fractional Anisotropy, ADC—Apparent ...
Table 3
DBSI Results—Brainstem and internal capsule.

3.4. TBSS Results

A subsequent confirmatory analysis was carried out with TBSS. Tract-based spatial statistics comparison of all SCI cohorts with healthy controls demonstrated no significant differences.

4. Discussion

While conventional MRI provides details about the degree of spinal cord compression, parenchymal edema, and evidence of hemorrhage after an acute SCI, it provides no information about preserved axonal integrity [32,33]. Increasingly, DTI has been proposed as a surrogate marker for injury in both CSM and SCI [18,34,35,36,37]. In chronic disease, we would expect axonal loss at the zone of injury but what has remained unclear is whether Wallerian degeneration extends rostrally above the cortical spinal tracts and into the brain. Previous work with DTI has shown that DTI metrics are confounded by increased cellularity and vasogenic edema in ongoing states of acute or ongoing compression such as CSM or acute SCI. DBSI has been proposed to address DTI limitations by resolving multiple-tensor water diffusion resulting from axon injury, demyelination, and inflammation [4]. In a chronic disease state, we hypothesized both DTI and DBSI would demonstrate axonal loss extending to the level of the CP and IC, resulting in decreased FA and AD values that correlate with disease severity. DTI identified changes of FA, AD, and RD for ASIA-A/B patients at the level of CP. However as increasingly reported in the literature, interpretations of DTI indices are not specific as pathologic complexity increases. DBSI results suggested axonal injury and edema/tissue loss in CP for ASIA-A/B patients that increased with injury severity. Indeed, Cervical ASIA A/B SCI patients had higher levels of axonal injury and edema/tissue loss as measured by DBSI at the level of the cerebral peduncle. DTI was able to detect differences in cervical ASIA A/B patients (FA, AD, and RD), but they were non-specific to pathologies. Increased water fraction indicated by DBSI non-restricted isotropic diffusion fraction in the cerebral peduncle explains the simultaneously increased DTI AD and DTI RD values. Our results further demonstrate the utility of DTI to detect disruption in axonal integrity in white matter, yet a clear shortcoming in differentiating true axonal injury from inflammation/tissue loss.

The whole-brain analysis using TBSS failed to detect any statistical difference on all DTI and DBSI indices. While this automated whole-brain analysis can reveal locations of effects globally, minor changes may be harder to detect by TBSS because voxels more distant from tract centers contribute less to the average value projected on the skeleton [38].

Although SCI does not result in injury to cortical neurons, it does produce a physiologic disconnection of the distal motor targets, and it disassociates the sensorimotor areas. The cortical reorganization that occurs after SCI is not well defined. Previous authors have suggested there is loss of grey and white matter volume in cervical SCI patients as compared to normal controls [39]. Using functional MRI (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, multiple authors have also reported increased cortical and subcortical activation in patients with SCI [40,41,42,43]. By contrast, several authors have reported no change or decreased cortical activation in individuals with SCI [44,45,46,47]. The significance of fMRI and PET studies remains unclear and provides no direct information regarding preserved axonal integrity. What does seem abundantly clear is that cortical reorganization occurs following SCI, but how this affects one’s potential for subsequent functional recovery or response to adjunctive treatment remains unclear [48,49,50].

Recently, Kurpad SN et al. [50] described changes that occur in network connectivity following SCI using resting state fMRI. The authors reported reduced functional connectivity in the sensorimotor cortex from SCI patients as compared to normal controls, yet an increase in connectivity with the thalamus. These dynamic changes seem intuitive given the known mismatch in efferent and afferent axons that occurs after SCI and further supports previous fMRI and PET studies that neural plasticity does allow for a shift in cortical connectivity, but what still remains unclear is whether this leads to subsequent axonal loss.

Only recently has DTI been used to investigate the cortical and subcortical changes that are thought to occur after SCI. In patients with chronic SCIs (i.e., >24 months), several authors have reported DTI metrics of brain CSTs decrease as compared with normal controls [51,52]. While we did find increased RD, and decreased FA and AD at the level of the CPs, this difference resolved rostrally at the level of the IC. However the AD, a marker for axonal injury, is supposed to decrease, not increase. Due to the limitation of single tensor model of DTI, both AD and RD will be elevated when edema/tissue loss is present. In such case, DTI overestimates axonal injury and demyelination. This loss would be expected with Wallerian degeneration occurring above the level of SCI. What is not well-defined is how much degeneration occurs at the level of internal capsule and cortically. DBSI was developed to address multiple co-existing pathologies by modeling anisotropic diffusion components (fiber tracts) from isotropic ones (structures and pathologies surrounding fiber tracts). Thus, DBSI can quantitatively evaluate fiber integrity, as well as edema/tissue loss and inflammation.

In the current study, DBSI results demonstrated both axonal injury and edema/tissue loss occurred at the level of CP in cervical ASIA-A/B patient, but not in any other patients as compared to normal controls. Furthermore, no differences were observed in any of the groups for any of the metrics at the level of the internal capsule. While cortical reorganization has been described following traumatic SCI [50,53,54,55], our results may help explain why patients, even years after a complete SCI, respond to epidural stimulation [56,57,58,59] and why recovery was observed following nerve transfers for SCI [60,61]. The loss of somatosensory input may redirect cortical activity, but as suggested by our results, does not necessarily lead to axonal loss. These results are promising and have implications for future trials aimed at treating chronic SCI.

Limitations—There are several limitations to consider from the presented data. First is the low numbers of patients, which may potentially account for the lack of any significant differences across the SCI cohorts. Second is lack of additional connectivity data, ideally this data could be corrected with resting state fMRI to assess concurrent changes in the various states of SCI.

5. Conclusions

MRI and increasingly advanced sequences such as DTI and DBSI provide guidance in the management and diagnosis of CNS pathologies. DTI and DBSI have been proposed as non-invasive tools that measure both axonal injury and demyelination. In this small subset of patients, DTI and DBSI measures of axonal loss and demyelination did not correlate with patient functional status. These results are promising to future regenerative treatment strategies, demonstrating axons may be preserved rostrally at the site of injury. This preservation at a higher cortical level may provide some insight as to why some patients respond to more recent epidural stimulation even years out from injury.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by University of Missouri Spinal Cord Injury Research Program (Wilson Z. Ray) and National Institute of Health K23NS084932 (Wilson Z. Ray).

Appendix A

Table A1

Diffusion vector table.

xyz
1−1.00000.00000.0000
2−0.6667−0.66670.0000
3−0.6667−0.3333−0.3333
4−0.6667−0.33330.0000
5−0.6667−0.33330.3333
6−0.66670.0000−0.6667
7−0.66670.0000−0.3333
8−0.66670.00000.0000
9−0.66670.00000.3333
10−0.66670.00000.6667
11−0.66670.3333−0.3333
12−0.66670.33330.0000
13−0.66670.33330.3333
14−0.66670.66670.0000
15−0.3333−0.6667−0.3333
16−0.3333−0.66670.0000
17−0.3333−0.66670.3333
18−0.3333−0.3333−0.6667
19−0.3333−0.3333−0.3333
20−0.3333−0.33330.0000
21−0.3333−0.33330.3333
22−0.3333−0.33330.6667
23−0.33330.0000−0.6667
24−0.33330.0000−0.3333
25−0.33330.00000.0000
26−0.33330.00000.3333
27−0.33330.00000.6667
28−0.33330.3333−0.6667
29−0.33330.3333−0.3333
30−0.33330.33330.0000
31−0.33330.33330.3333
32−0.33330.33330.6667
33−0.33330.6667−0.3333
34−0.33330.66670.0000
35−0.33330.66670.3333
360.0000−1.00000.0000
370.0000−0.6667−0.6667
380.0000−0.6667−0.3333
390.0000−0.66670.0000
400.0000−0.66670.3333
410.0000−0.66670.6667
420.0000−0.3333−0.6667
430.0000−0.3333−0.3333
440.0000−0.33330.0000
450.0000−0.33330.3333
460.0000−0.33330.6667
470.00000.0000−1.0000
480.00000.0000−0.6667
490.00000.0000−0.3333
500.00000.00000.0000
510.00000.00000.3333
520.00000.00000.6667
530.00000.00001.0000
540.00000.3333−0.6667
550.00000.3333−0.3333
560.00000.33330.0000
570.00000.33330.3333
580.00000.33330.6667
590.00000.6667−0.6667
600.00000.6667−0.3333
610.00000.66670.0000
620.00000.66670.3333
630.00000.66670.6667
640.00001.00000.0000
650.3333−0.6667−0.3333
660.3333−0.66670.0000
670.3333−0.66670.3333
680.3333−0.3333−0.6667
690.3333−0.3333−0.3333
700.3333−0.33330.0000
710.3333−0.33330.3333
720.3333−0.33330.6667
730.33330.0000−0.6667
740.33330.0000−0.3333
750.33330.00000.0000
760.33330.00000.3333
770.33330.00000.6667
780.33330.3333−0.6667
790.33330.3333−0.3333
800.33330.33330.0000
810.33330.33330.3333
820.33330.33330.6667
830.33330.6667−0.3333
840.33330.66670.0000
850.33330.66670.3333
860.6667−0.66670.0000
870.6667−0.3333−0.3333
880.6667−0.33330.0000
890.6667−0.33330.3333
900.66670.0000−0.6667
910.66670.0000−0.3333
920.66670.00000.0000
930.66670.00000.3333
940.66670.00000.6667
950.66670.3333−0.3333
960.66670.33330.0000
970.66670.33330.3333
980.66670.66670.0000
991.00000.00000.0000

Author Contributions

Author Contributions

Wilson Z. Ray, Rory K.J. Murphy, Peng Sun, and Sheng-Kwei Song conceived and designed the study. Sheng-Kwei Song and Peng Sun analyzed the data. Wilson Z. Ray, Rory K.J. Murphy, Peng Sun, and Sheng-Kwei Song wrote the paper. Paul Gamble and Ajit George assisted in data collection, preparation of manuscript, and review of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of Interest

Wilson Z. Ray has the following conflicts of interest to report: Depuy, Ulrich, Globus Consulting, Department of Defense Grant, and NIH grant support. Sheng-Kwei Song has the following conflicts of interest to report: NIH grant support. All other authors have no conflict of interest to report. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

1. Ackery A., Tator C., Krassioukov A. A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology. J Neurotraum. 2004;21:1355–1370. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1355. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Kim J.H., Loy D.N., Liang H.F., Trinkaus K., Schmidt R.E., Song S.K. Noninvasive diffusion tensor imaging of evolving white matter pathology in a mouse model of acute spinal cord injury. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007;58:253–260. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21316. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Naismith R.T., Xu J., Klawiter E.C., Lancia S., Tutlam N.T., Wagner J.M., Qian P., Trinkaus K., Song S.K., Cross A.H. Spinal cord tract diffusion tensor imaging reveals disability substrate in demyelinating disease. Neurology. 2013;80:2201–2209. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318296e8f1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Wang Y., Wang Q., Haldar J.P., Yeh F.C., Xie M., Sun P., Tu T.W., Trinkaus K., Klein R.S., Cross A.H., et al. Quantification of increased cellularity during inflammatory demyelination. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 12):3590–3601. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr307. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Barker G.J. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spinal cord and optic nerve. J. Neurol. Sci. 2001;186(Suppl. 1):S45–S49. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(01)00490-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Sotak C.H. The role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of ischemic brain injury—A review. NMR Biomed. 2002;15:561–569. doi: 10.1002/nbm.786. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Le Bihan D., Mangin J.F., Poupon C., Clark C.A., Pappata S., Molko N., Chabriat H. Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2001;13:534–546. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1076. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Mori S., van Zijl P.C. Fiber tracking: Principles and strategies—A technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002;15:468–480. doi: 10.1002/nbm.781. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Deo A.A., Grill R.J., Hasan K.M., Narayana P.A. In vivo serial diffusion tensor imaging of experimental spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. Res. 2006;83:801–810. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20783. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Kim J.H., Budde M.D., Liang H.F., Klein R.S., Russell J.H., Cross A.H., Song S.K. Detecting axon damage in spinal cord from a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Neurobiol. Dis. 2006;21:626–632. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.09.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Song S.K., Sun S.W., Ju W.K., Lin S.J., Cross A.H., Neufeld A.H. Diffusion tensor imaging detects and differentiates axon and myelin degeneration in mouse optic nerve after retinal ischemia. Neuroimage. 2003;20:1714–1722. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Song S.K., Sun S.W., Ramsbottom M.J., Chang C., Russell J., Cross A.H. Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water. Neuroimage. 2002;17:1429–1436. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1267. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Song S.K., Yoshino J., Le T.Q., Lin S.J., Sun S.W., Cross A.H., Armstrong R.C. Demyelination increases radial diffusivity in corpus callosum of mouse brain. Neuroimage. 2005;26:132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.028. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Sun S.W., Liang H.F., Trinkaus K., Cross A.H., Armstrong R.C., Song S.K. Noninvasive detection of cuprizone induced axonal damage and demyelination in the mouse corpus callosum. Magn. Reson. Med. 2006;55:302–308. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20774. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Budde M.D., Kim J.H., Liang H.F., Schmidt R.E., Russell J.H., Cross A.H., Song S.K. Toward accurate diagnosis of white matter pathology using diffusion tensor imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007;57:688–695. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Chiang C.W., Wang Y., Sun P., Lin T.H., Trinkaus K., Cross A.H., Song S.K. Quantifying white matter tract diffusion parameters in the presence of increased extra-fiber cellularity and vasogenic edema. Neuroimage. 2014;101:310–319. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.064. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Wang X., Cusick M.F., Wang Y., Sun P., Libbey J.E., Trinkaus K., Fujinami R.S., Song S.K. Diffusion basis spectrum imaging detects and distinguishes coexisting subclinical inflammation, demyelination and axonal injury in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mice. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:843–852. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3129. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Vedantam A., Jirjis M.B., Schmit B.D., Wang M.C., Ulmer J.L., Kurpad S.N. Diffusion tensor imaging of the spinal cord: Insights from animal and human studies. Neurosurgery. 2014;74:1–8. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000171. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Kirshblum S., Waring W., 3rd Updates for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2014;25:505–517. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.04.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Wedeen V.J., Hagmann P., Tseng W.Y.I., Reese T.G., Weisskoff R.M. Mapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005;54:1377–1386. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20642. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Kuo L.W., Chen J.H., Wedeen V.J., Tseng W.Y.I. Optimization of diffusion spectrum imaging and q-ball imaging on clinical MRI system. NeuroImage. 2008;41:7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.016. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Wang Y., Sun P., Wang Q., Trinkaus K., Schmidt R.E., Naismith R.T., Cross A.H., Song S.K. Differentiation and quantification of inflammation, demyelination and axon injury or loss in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2015;138:1223–1238. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv046. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Andersson J.L., Skare S., Ashburner J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: Application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage. 2003;20:870–888. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Oishi K., Zilles K., Amunts K., Faria A., Jiang H., Li X., Akhter K., Hua K., Woods R., Toga A.W., et al. Human brain white matter atlas: Identification and assignment of common anatomical structures in superficial white matter. Neuroimage. 2008;43:447–457. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.009. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Smith S.M., Jenkinson M., Johansen-Berg H., Rueckert D., Nichols T.E., Mackay C.E., Watkins K.E., Ciccarelli O., Cader M.Z., Matthews P.M., et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: Voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage. 2006;31:1487–1505. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Smith S.M., Jenkinson M., Woolrich M.W., Beckmann C.F., Behrens T.E., Johansen-Berg H., Bannister P.R., De Luca M., Drobnjak I., Flitney D.E., et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage. 2004;23:S208–S219. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Smith S.M. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2002;17:143–155. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10062. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Andersson J.L.R., Jenkinson M., Smith S. Non-Linear Optimisation. [(accessed on 16 February 2017)]. FMRIB Technical Report TR07JA1. Available online: http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/datasets/techrep/tr07ja1/tr07ja1.pdf.
29. Andersson J.L.R., Jenkinson M., Smith S. Non-Linear Registration, aka Spatial Normalisation FMRIB Technical Report TR07JA2. [(accessed on 16 February 2017)]. Available online: http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/datasets/techrep/tr07ja2/tr07ja2.pdf.
30. Rueckert D., Sonoda L.I., Hayes C., Hill D.L., Leach M.O., Hawkes D.J. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 1999;18:712–721. doi: 10.1109/42.796284. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Winkler A.M., Ridgway G.R., Webster M.A., Smith S.M., Nichols T.E. Permutation inference for the general linear model. Neuroimage. 2014;92:381–397. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Miyanji F., Furlan J.C., Aarabi B., Arnold P.M., Fehlings M.G. Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome—Prospective study with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2007;243:820–827. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2433060583. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Shepard M.J., Bracken M.B. Magnetic resonance imaging and neurological recovery in acute spinal cord injury: Observations from the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study 3. Spinal Cord. 1999;37:833–837. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100927. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Li X., Cui J.L., Mak K.C., Luk K.D., Hu Y. Potential use of diffusion tensor imaging in level diagnosis of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine. 2014;39:E615–E622. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000288. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Gao S.J., Yuan X., Jiang X.Y., Liu X.X., Liu X.P., Wang Y.F., Cao J.B., Bai L.N., Xu K. Correlation study of 3T-MR-DTI measurements and clinical symptoms of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur. J. Radiol. 2013;82:1940–1945. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.06.011. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Koskinen E., Brander A., Hakulinen U., Luoto T., Helminen M., Ylinen A., Ohman J. Assessing the state of chronic spinal cord injury using diffusion tensor imaging. J. Neurotrauma. 2013;30:1587–1595. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2943. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Vedantam A., Eckardt G., Wang M.C., Schmit B.D., Kurpad S.N. Clinical Correlates of High Cervical Fractional Anisotropy in Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. World Neurosurg. 2015;83:824–828. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.09.017. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Zalesky A. Moderating registration misalignment in voxelwise comparisons of DTI data: A performance evaluation of skeleton projection. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2011;29:111–125. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.06.027. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Freund P., Weiskopf N., Ward N.S., Hutton C., Gall A., Ciccarelli O., Craggs M., Friston K., Thompson A.J. Disability, atrophy and cortical reorganization following spinal cord injury. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 6):1610–1622. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr093. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Alkadhi H., Brugger P., Boendermaker S.H., Crelier G., Curt A., Hepp-Reymond M.C., Kollias S.S. What disconnection tells about motor imagery: Evidence from paraplegic patients. Cereb. Cortex. 2005;15:131–140. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh116. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Bruehlmeier M., Dietz V., Leenders K.L., Roelcke U., Missimer J., Curt A. How does the human brain deal with a spinal cord injury? Eur. J. Neurosci. 1998;10:3918–3922. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00454.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Cramer S.C., Lastra L., Lacourse M.G., Cohen M.J. Brain motor system function after chronic, complete spinal cord injury. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 12):2941–2950. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh648. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Hotz-Boendermaker S., Funk M., Summers P., Brugger P., Hepp-Reymond M.C., Curt A., Kollias S.S. Preservation of motor programs in paraplegics as demonstrated by attempted and imagined foot movements. Neuroimage. 2008;39:383–394. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.065. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Castro A., Diaz F., van Boxtel G.J. How does a short history of spinal cord injury affect movement-related brain potentials? Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007;25:2927–2934. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05532.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Halder P., Curt A., Brem S., Lang-Dullenkopf A., Bucher K., Kollias S., Brandeis D. Preserved aspects of cortical foot control in paraplegia. Neuroimage. 2006;31:692–698. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.018. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Mattia D., Cincotti F., Mattiocco M., Scivoletto G., Marciani M.G., Babiloni F. Motor-related cortical dynamics to intact movements in tetraplegics as revealed by high-resolution EEG. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2006;27:510–519. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20195. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Sabbah P., de S.S., Leveque C., Gay S., Pfefer F., Nioche C., Sarrazin J.L., Barouti H., Tadie M., Cordoliani Y.S. Sensorimotor cortical activity in patients with complete spinal cord injury: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurotrauma. 2002;19:53–60. doi: 10.1089/089771502753460231. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Kokotilo K.J., Eng J.J., Curt A. Reorganization and preservation of motor control of the brain in spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J. Neurotrauma. 2009;26:2113–2126. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0688. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Hou J.M., Sun T.S., Xiang Z.M., Zhang J.Z., Zhang Z.C., Zhao M., Zhong J.F., Liu J., Zhang H., Liu H.L., et al. Alterations of resting-state regional and network-level neural function after acute spinal cord injury. Neuroscience. 2014;277:446–454. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.045. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Oni-Orisan A., Kaushal M., Li W., Leschke J., Ward B.D., Vedantam A., Kalinosky B., Budde M.D., Schmit B.D., Li S.J., et al. Alterations in Cortical Sensorimotor Connectivity following Complete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Resting-State fMRI Study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0150351 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150351. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Wrigley P.J., Gustin S.M., Macey P.M., Nash P.G., Gandevia S.C., Macefield V.G., Siddall P.J., Henderson L.A. Anatomical changes in human motor cortex and motor pathways following complete thoracic spinal cord injury. Cereb. Cortex. 2009;19:224–232. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn072. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Freund P., Wheeler-Kingshott C.A., Nagy Z., Gorgoraptis N., Weiskopf N., Friston K., Thompson A.J., Hutton C. Axonal integrity predicts cortical reorganisation following cervical injury. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2012;83:629–637. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-301875. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Min Y.S., Park J.W., Jin S.U., Jang K.E., Nam H.U., Lee Y.S., Jung T.D., Chang Y. Alteration of Resting-State Brain Sensorimotor Connectivity following Spinal Cord Injury: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. J. Neurotrauma. 2015;32:1422–1427. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3661. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Jin B., Su Y., Zhang Y., Wang B., Wang H., Wang K., Yan T. Reorganization of brain cortex after spinal cord injury based on functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014;94:3082–3084. [PubMed]
55. Moxon K.A., Oliviero A., Aguilar J., Foffani G. Cortical reorganization after spinal cord injury: Always for good? Neuroscience. 2014;283:78–94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.056. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Chavakula V., Vasudeva V., Chi J. Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Restoration of Balance and Gait Following Spinal Cord Injury. Neurosurgery. 2016;78:N19–N20. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000484059.58417.dc. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
57. Gad P., Choe J., Nandra M.S., Zhong H., Roy R.R., Tai Y.C., Edgerton V.R. Development of a multi-electrode array for spinal cord epidural stimulation to facilitate stepping and standing after a complete spinal cord injury in adult rats. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2013;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
58. Minassian K., McKay W.B., Binder H., Hofstoetter U.S. Targeting Lumbar Spinal Neural Circuitry by Epidural Stimulation to Restore Motor Function After Spinal Cord Injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2016;13:284–294. doi: 10.1007/s13311-016-0421-y. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Vasudeva V.S., Abd-El-Barr M., Chi J. Lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulation enables recovery of voluntary movement after complete motor spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 2014;75:N14–N15. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000457194.09781.8a. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
60. Hawasli A.H., Chang J., Reynolds M.R., Ray W.Z. Transfer of the brachialis to the anterior interosseous nerve as a treatment strategy for cervical spinal cord injury: Technical note. Glob. Spine J. 2015;5:110–117. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396760. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
61. Mackinnon S.E., Yee A., Ray W.Z. Nerve transfers for the restoration of hand function after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosurg. 2012;117:176–185. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.JNS12328. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Brain Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)