PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jcdrAbout UsAuthor ServicesArchiveSubmitJCDR
 
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 January; 11(1): SC08–SC10.
Published online 2017 January 1. doi:  10.7860/JCDR/2017/22697.9267
PMCID: PMC5324459

Urinary Uric Acid/Creatinine Ratio - A Marker For Perinatal Asphyxia

Abstract

Background

Perinatal hypoxia is one of the leading causes of perinatal mortality in developing countries. Both apgar score and arterial blood pH predict the neonatal mortality in asphyxia. Apgar score alone does not predict neurologic outcome and as it is influenced by various factors. This study was conducted to evaluate the utility and sensitivity of urinary uric acid to creatinine ratio (UA/Cr ratio) in asphyxia diagnosis, compared to invasive Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) analysis.

Aim

To assess the urinary uric acid/creatinine ratio as an additional marker for perinatal asphyxia compared with ABG analysis in apgar score monitoring.

Materials and Methods

The present case control study was conducted at a teaching hospital in Central Gujarat. Data of 40 healthy newborns and 40 asphyxiated newborns were collected. In absence of regional estimates, a sample of size 39 was required to attain a power of 80% at 5% alpha (type I error) considering a moderate effect size of 0.65. (UA/Cr) ratio was measured from the spot urine sample collected during 24-72 hours of birth. Statistical analysis was performed by Independent t-test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) plots.

Results

The mean (UA/Cr ratio) (2.75±0.18 vs 1.78±0.23) is significantly higher in asphyxiated group than in the control group (p<0.0001). Urinary UA/Cr ratio had negative correlation with blood pH (r= -0.27, p=0.18), which was not significant (p>0.05). Urinary UA/Cr ratio with criterion of >2.3 had 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity with AUC of 1 (p<0.0001) had a better predictive value.

Conclusions

Apgar score is usually reduced in neonates with congenital anomalies and premature neonates. Hence, it is preferable that the clinical diagnosis of asphyxia by apgar scores be supported by other investigations so that early decision can be taken about the level of care the baby needs. pH, lactates and base deficits change with establishment of respiration following resuscitation. However, pH, lactate, base deficit estimations are invasive and need rapid estimations. Non-invasive urinary UA/Cr ratio may be an answer to these issues as it easy, economical and equally efficient.

Keywords: Asphyxia markers, Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, Neonatal mortality

Introduction

Cerebral blood flow and gas exchange is compromised in perinatal asphyxia leading to acidosis, hypercapnea and hypoxia. The poor outcomes thus result in high neonatal mortality rates as well as high morbidity rates in developing countries [1,2]. The diagnosis and grading of asphyxia can be difficult especially if relevant information at the time of delivery is not available [3,4]. There is ample literature available that has improved our understanding of the mechanisms that lead to birth asphyxia [5], but early indicators of tissue damages due to birth asphyxia are lacking and not widely studied. Brief hypoxia damages cerebral oxidative metabolism leading to an anaerobic glycolysis, yielding only 2 molecules of Adenosine Triphosphate as compared to 32 molecules of ATP during aerobic conditions [6]. Prolonged hypoxia, produces further failure of oxidative phosphorylation and ATP production. Lack of ATP and increased cellular destruction will cause an accumulation of Adenosine Monophosphate (AMP) and Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP), which will then get catabolised to its constituents of adenosine, inosine and hypoxanthine [7,8]. Continuous tissue hypoxia and consequent reperfusion injury will result in hypoxanthine being oxidized to xanthine and uric acid in presence of xanthine oxidase. This will increase the uric acid production and cause it to enter blood from damaged tissues. This uric acid will then get excreted in urine where it can be easily detected. There are also over one million neonatal deaths per year in India which is 25% of the total global burden of neonatal deaths. The overall neonatal mortality rate in India is 28/1000 live births [9]. The most commonly used diagnostic and prognostic index to evaluate asphyxia in neonate is apgar score [10]. But apgar score alone is not useful to ferret out neurologic outcome, which is influenced by various factors like immaturity, foetal malformations, maternal medications and infection [11].

Accurate appraisal of late neurological consequences has failed by performing policies such as foetal heart monitoring [12], Apgar score [13]. While analysis of xanthine, hypoxanthine, and some inflammatory cytokines are time consuming, costly and not routinely available for clinical care [1417].

We set out to assess the urinary ratio (UA/Cr) in relation to apgar score and arterial blood gas analysis, as a marker for perinatal asphyxia in our clinical setting.

Materials and Methods

The study was carried out in the Department of Paediatrics of a University Medical College in Gujarat. The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is Level 3 and also runs a fellowship program in neonatology and has ability to do cooling for perinatal asphyxia as well as advanced capabilities of ventilation such as nitric oxide and high frequency ventilation. All deliveries are attended by residents trained in neonatal resuscitation. Eighty neonates were recruited for the study. Forty term babies with 35 weeks of gestations with apgar score >/=7 at 5 min with no signs of asphyxia were recruited as controls and 40 term babies with >35 weeks of gestations admitted to NICU with apgar score of 6 or less at 5 minutes of birth were recruited as cases. In absence of regional estimates, a sample of size 39 was required to attain a power of 80% at 5% alpha (type I error) considering a moderate effect size of 0.65. Babies with congenital malformations, suspected metabolic disease on treatment with diuretics, suffering from anuria and those born to mothers having hypertension, diabetes mellitus, toxaemia of pregnancy, receiving general anaesthesia, pethidine, phenobarbitone and other drugs likely to cause depression in babies. The neonates that were included in the study did not undergo therapeutic hypothermia before the collection of the urinary sample. Mother with febrile attack within 2 months before delivery was excluded from study. The spot urinary samples within 72 hours of birth were collected by staff nurse in sterilized disposable urine bag and analyzed in hospital laboratory for UA/Cr ratio. Urinary uric acid was estimated by auto analyzer by spectrophotometric uricase method. Urinary creatinine was estimated in same above instrument by using Jaffe’s alkaline picrate method. ABG values from ABG GEM Premier were taken.

Analysis was performed using the commercially available statistical Software - STATA (14.2), and Excel 2016. The p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to test the strength of association between arterial blood pH and other variables. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) plots were used to determine the cut-off values of various parameters.

Ethical clearance was obtained by institution’s Human Research Ethics Committee.

Results

There were 21 females and 19 males in both groups. The mean gestational age and birth weight of asphyxiated group (35.79±1.78 weeks, 2.31±0.65 kg) were significantly lower than the control group (38.25±0.98 weeks, 2.80±1.96 kg) respectively (p<0.05). Details of baseline characteristics are given in [Table/Fig-1].

[Table/Fig-1]:
Baseline characteristics.

Urinary UA/Cr ratio showed negative correlation with arterial blood pH (r= -0.18, p=0.2713), which was not significant. Mean of various parameters like Apgar 5th min, arterial blood pH, Partial Pressure of Oxygen (pO2) (mm Hg) values (5.33, 7.04, 37.13) respectively were significantly lower in asphyxiated group than control group-values (8.25, 7.39, 58.70) respectively (p<0.0001). Mean of various parameters like Partial Pressure of Carbondioxide (PCO2) (mm Hg), urinary uric acid (mg/dl), and urinary uric acid/ creatinine ratio values (48.43, 37.72, 2.75) respectively were significantly higher in asphyxiated group than control group-values (40.78, 20.19, 1.78) respectively (p<0.0001). Apgar 5th min, arterial blood pH, pO2, pCO2, urinary uric acid, urinary creatinine, UA/Cr ratio between asphyxiated newborns, and healthy newborns are seen [Table/Fig-2]. The ROC curve analysis of the parameter studied is given in [Table/Fig-3] and [Table/Fig-4].

[Table/Fig-2]:
Comparison of various parameters between the control and asphyxiated group.
[Table/Fig-3]:
ROC curve analysis-The predictive values of biochemical parameters for Perinatal asphyxia- Arterial blood pH, pO2, pCO2, and UA/Cr ratio.
[Table/Fig-4]:
ROC Curve Analysis.

Discussion

Low apgar score is commonly used to as a indicator of asphyxia in infants, but it may often be not available and may be reduced in premature infants [11]. Other investigations that support the diagnosis of asphyxia would be required to improve availability of therapy. pH values are quickly normalized after the onset of respiration, due to the elimination of carbon dioxide and cannot be relied upon in patients that are transported. Additionally, lactate and base deficit are closely interconnected. The current study asserts that, urinary UA/Cr ratio >2.3 in spot urine sample within 72 hours of life had 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity with AUC of 1.000 (p<0.0001) is a better marker for perinatal asphyxia. Increased urinary UA/Cr ratio can thus be considered a useful investigation for impaired oxygen delivery in the newborn as it reflects an increased ATP degradation [18].

Urinary UA/Cr ratio is simple, non-invasive, painless and economical investigation for the diagnosis of perinatal asphyxia. Combined use of arterial blood pH, apgar scores and UA/Cr ratio can help in early decision making about the level of care the new born requires. There have been very few studies from developing countries that have focused on this parameter. Basu et al., showed that the urinary UA/Cr ratios were significantly higher in cases than controls (3.1±1.3 vs 0.96±0.54; p < 0.001) and among asphyxia patients [19], a significant negative linear correlation was found between the UA/Cr ratio and the apgar score (r = -0.857, p < 0.001). Current study is in consonance with many other studies that have looked at low apgar score and urinary UA/Cr ratio [4,7,12,18,20].

Bader D et al., found a significant correlation between urinary UA/Cr ratio and apgar score (r = 0.86, p < 0.01). This result is not in agreement with our result. On the other hand, they reported that the UA/Cr was higher in the asphyxiated group when compared to controls. (2.06 + 1.12, vs. 0.64 + 0.48; p < 0.001), these are similar type findings with our results [21]. A comparison of the various similar studies which shown in [Table/Fig-5] [18,2022].

[Table/Fig-5]:
Studies that have comparable effects to current study [18,2022].

Limitation

Limitations of our study are methodological in nature. More details on asphyxiated neonates such as duration of labor, duration of resuscitation, time to first breath, etc may throw more light on the utility and limitations of the lab tests. We are also limited by the fact that this is single center study with a relatively small sample size. Multicentric studies with more sample size will allow us to utilize more variables in multivariate analysis and further improve upon the predictive value of this marker.

Conclusion

Urinary UA/Cr ratio is an accessible, non-invasive, painless and cost-effective additional framework with good predictive value for diagnosing perinatal asphyxia. There exists still a need to study these parameters in the context of therapeutic hypothermia and how the parameters change over the period of treatment.

Notes

Financial or Other Competing Interests

None.

References

[1] Dutta DC, Konar H. Text book of obstetrics including perinatology and contraception. 4 ed. Calcutta: New Central Book Publisher; 1998. Diseases of the Fetus and the Newborn. In: Dutta DC, Konar H, editors; pp. 504–05.
[2] Sykes GS, Molloy PM, Johnson P, Gu W, Ashworth F, Stirrat GM, et al. Do Apgar scores indicate asphyxia? Lancet. 1982;1(8270):494–96. [PubMed]
[3] Portman RJ, Carter BS, Gaylord MS, Murphy MG, Thieme RE, Merenstein GB. Predicting neonatal morbidity after perinatal asphyxia: A scoring system. Am J ObstetGynecol. 1990;162:174–82. [PubMed]
[4] Harkness RA, Simmonds RJ, Coade SB, Lawrence CR. Ratio of the concentration of hypoxanthine to creatinine in urine from newborn infants: A possible indicator for the metabolic damage due to hypoxia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983;90(5):447–52. [PubMed]
[5] Snyder EY, Cloherty JP. Manual of Neonatal Care. 4ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1998. Perinatal Asphyxia. In: Cloherty JP, Stark Ann R, editors; p. 530.
[6] Rich PR. The molecular machinery of Keilin’s respiratory chain. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2003;31(Pt 6):1095–105. [PubMed]
[7] Manzke H, Von Kreudenstein PS, Dorner K, Kruse K. Quantitative measurements of the urinary excretion of creatinine, uric acid, hypoxanthine and xanthine, uracil, cyclic AMP, and cyclic GMP in healthy newborn infants. Eur J Pediatr. 1980;133:157–61. [PubMed]
[8] Deorari A, Paul Vinod K, Aggarwal R, Aggarwal R, Upadhyay A, Chawla D, et al. National Neonatal-Perinatal Database. National Neonatology Forum NNPD Netw. 2003
[9] Bank W. Mortality rate, neonatal (per 1,000 live births) [Internet]. Data. World Bank; [cited 2016Aug30]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/sh.dyn.nmrt.
[10] Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(7):467–71. [PubMed]
[11] American Academy of Pediatrics. The APGAR score. Advances in Neonatal Care. 2006;6(4):220–23. [PubMed]
[12] Manzke H, Dörner K, Grünitz J. Urinary hypoxanthine, xanthine and uric acid excretion in newborn infants with perinatal complications. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1977;66(6):713–17. [PubMed]
[13] Nelson KB, Dambrosia JM, Ting TY, Grether JK. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(10):613–18. [PubMed]
[14] Tekgul H, Yalaz M, Kutukculer N, Ozbek S, Kose T, Akisu M, et al. Value of biochemical markers for outcome in term infants with asphyxia. Pediatr Neurol. 2004;31(5):326–32. [PubMed]
[15] Naithani M, Simalti AK. Biochemical Markers in Perinatal Asphyxia. J Nepal Paediatr Soc. 2011;31(2):151–56.
[16] Lin M, Chou H, Chen C, Tsao P, Hsieh W. Early serum biochemical markers and clinical outcomes in term infants with perinatal asphyxia or low apgar scores. Clin Neonatol. 2008;15(1):10–5.
[17] Law JA, Panagiotopoulos C, Derrik EJ. Newborn complications after intrapartum asphyxia with metabolic acidosis in the term fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1081–87. [PubMed]
[18] Bhongir AV, Yakama AV, Saha S, Radia SB, Pabbati J. The Urinary Uric Acid/Creatinine Ratio is An Adjuvant Marker for Perinatal Asphyxia. Eur J Pharm Med Res. 2015;2(5):520–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[19] Basu P, Som S, Choudhuri N, Das H. Correlation between apgar score and urinary uric acid to creatinine ratio in perinatal asphyxia. Indian journal of clinical biochemistry. 2008;23(4):361–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[20] Chen HJ, Yau KI, Tsai KS. Urinary uric acid/creatinine ratio as an additional marker of perinatal asphyxia. J Formos Med assoc. 2000;99:771–74. [PubMed]
[21] Bader D, Gozal D, Weinger-Abend M, Berger A, Lanir A. Neonatal urinary uric acid/creatinine [correction of creatinine] ratio as an additional marker of perinatal asphyxia. Eur J Pediatr. 1995;154(9):747–49. [PubMed]
[22] Orozco-Gregorio D, Mota-Rojas M, Alonso-Spilsbury M, González-Lozano M, Trujillo-Ortega SA, Olmos-Hernández P, et al. Importance of blood gas measurements in perinatal asphyxia and alternatives to restore the acid base balance status to improve the newborn performance. Am J Biotechnol Biochem. 2007;3(3):131–40.

Articles from Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR are provided here courtesy of JCDR Research & Publications Private Limited