PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of fcimbLink to Publisher's site
 
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017; 7: 49.
Published online 2017 February 24. doi:  10.3389/fcimb.2017.00049
PMCID: PMC5323412

Long-Term Safety of Topical Bacteriophage Application to the Frontal Sinus Region

Abstract

Background: Staphylococcus aureus biofilms contribute negatively to a number of chronic conditions, including chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). With the inherent tolerance of biofilm-bound bacteria to antibiotics and the global problem of bacterial antibiotic resistance, the need to develop novel therapeutics is paramount. Phage therapy has previously shown promise in treating sinonasal S. aureus biofilms.

Methods: This study investigates the long term (20 days) safety of topical sinonasal flushes with bacteriophage suspensions. The bacteriophage cocktail NOV012 against S. aureus selected for this work contains two highly characterized and different phages, P68 and K710. Host range was assessed against S. aureus strains isolated from CRS patients using agar spot tests. NOV012 was applied topically to the frontal sinus region of sheep, twice daily for 20 days. General sheep wellbeing, mucosal structural changes and inflammatory load were assessed to determine safety of NOV012 application.

Results: NOV012 could lyse 52/61 (85%) of a panel of locally derived CRS clinical isolates. Application of NOV012 to the frontal sinuses of sheep for 20 days was found to be safe, with no observed inflammatory infiltration or tissue damage within the sinus mucosa.

Conclusion: NOV012 cocktail appears safe to apply for extended periods to sheep sinuses and it could infect and lyse a wide range of S. aureus CRS clinical isolates. This indicates that phage therapy has strong potential as a treatment for chronic bacterial rhinosinusitis.

Keywords: bacteriophage, therapeutic safety, topical, inflammation, cilia, Staphylococcus aureus

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic bacterial pathogen forming biofilms, which are known to be involved in a number of infective chronic diseases (Petti and Fowler, 2003; Ziran, 2007; Baldoni et al., 2009; Foreman and Wormald, 2010; Singhal et al., 2010, 2011; Jervis-Bardy and Wormald, 2012). These include osteomyelitis (Ziran, 2007), endocarditis (Petti and Fowler, 2003), as well as infections of indwelling devices (Baldoni et al., 2009). In addition, sinonasal bound biofilms of S. aureus are known to impact negatively in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The presence of such infections in CRS reportedly leads to more frequent out-patient visits (Singhal et al., 2011), increased risk of recurrent infections and antibiotic use (Jervis-Bardy and Wormald, 2012) as well as poorer post-operative progression (Foreman and Wormald, 2010; Singhal et al., 2010). Such biofilms are up to 1000-fold more tolerant of current antibiotic therapies than their planktonic counterparts (Anwar et al., 1990). Further, increased levels of antibiotic resistance observed in pathogenic bacteria around the globe (Roca et al., 2015) also limit the success of antibiotic therapies. It is important that new therapies which effectively treat such infections are identified.

One alternative to antibiotics, originally described in the early 1900s and coming back into focus, is bacteriophage “phage” therapy (Carlton, 1999). Beneficially, phages are not only effective against planktonic infections, but can also infect and lyse biofilm-bound cells (Doolittle et al., 1995; Corbin et al., 2001; Tait et al., 2002; Sillankorva et al., 2004; Curtin and Donlan, 2006; Cerca et al., 2007; Lu and Collins, 2007; Carson et al., 2010; Fu et al., 2010). Recently, we have shown that topical phage therapy has potential against pathogenic S. aureus bacterial biofilms, using an animal model of rhinosinusitis (Drilling et al., 2014a). Our previous work demonstrated the safety of once-daily phage application into the frontal sinuses of sheep for 3 days (Drilling et al., 2014a). The first aim of the current work was to examine the safety of phage administration for a substantially longer period of time. In the current study we investigated the effects of a longer-term (20 day) application of twice-daily frontal sinus bacteriophage flushes in sheep. A cocktail of two phages against S. aureus, designated NOV012, was used. NOV012 contains two highly-characterized phages, K710 and P68. Both the parental version of phage K710, phage K (O'Flaherty et al., 2004), and phage P68 (Vybiral et al., 2003) have had their genomes completely sequenced, and they have been shown to lack any known genes that could increase the virulence of S. aureus or confer resistance to antibiotics (Vybiral et al., 2003; O'Flaherty et al., 2004). Phages K710 and P68 have been shown to be active against a wide range of S. aureus isolates from the United Kingdom and Europe (Takac and Blasi, 2005; J Clark, personal communication). The second aim of this work was to extend these observations by examining the susceptibility of local (Australian) S. aureus isolates to the phages in NOV012.

Methods

Bacteriophage

A phage cocktail (NOV012) comprised of preparations of highly purified phages, K710 and P68, was obtained from Novolytics Pty. Ltd. (Warrington, United Kingdom). This cocktail of phages is functionally similar to the CTSA cocktail (Special Phage Services, Brookvale, NSW, Australia) which we used previously (Drilling et al., 2014a). For commercial reasons CTSA was unavailable. The concentration of phages in NOV012 stock was maintained at 1 × 108 PFU/mL for in vivo and in vitro work. To produce a heat-inactivated version of the cocktail, the phage stock was treated at 121°C for 15 min and tested by plaque assay to confirm complete inactivation prior to use.

Bacteria

Investigation of S. aureus strains isolated from CRS patients was approved by The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Human Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained for all study participants. To isolate S. aureus from sinonasal swabs, Columbian blood agar plates, colistin nalidixic acid plates or cystine lactose electrolyte deficient plates (all from Thermofisher Scientific, Australia) were employed. Latex agglutination tests and antibiotic sensitivity testing were performed by the commercial laboratory Adelaide Pathology Partners and used to confirm identification of S. aureus and MRSA strains (data not shown). Antibiotic resistance was determined using disc diffusion methods as according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations (CLSI, 2012). Isolates were then subcultured in nutrient broth overnight (Thermo Fisher, Scoresby, Victoria, Australia) and stored in nutrient broth with 20% glycerol at −80°C.

CRS bacterial isolate susceptibility to phage infection

Bacterial sensitivity to phage infection was assessed by spotting phage onto bacterial lawns in an agar overlay system. Briefly, S. aureus isolates were cultured overnight at 37°C with shaking for 16–18 h in nutrient broth. Overnight cultures were diluted 1:30 in liquid 0.4% nutrient agar which was overlayed onto 1% nutrient agar. Dilutions of P68, K710, and the cocktail of these (NOV012) were spotted onto soft agar plates and allowed to dry. Plates were inverted and incubated overnight at 37°C. Spots were assessed the next day and phage titres and plaque morphologies recorded. Plaques were ranked “+++” (highly sensitive, clear plaque) through to “+” (slightly sensitive, plaque barely discernible), and plaques of status intermediate between these were ranked “++” (moderately sensitive). Results were termed “lysis from without” (LWO) when zones of inhibition were observed however discreet plaques were not evident when the assay used diluted phage stocks. Bacterial isolates were considered susceptible to phages if a plaque was discernible. To determine the strain type of the isolates, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used as described (O'Brien et al., 2006). Isolates with ≥80% similarity or <6 band differences were considered the same strain. Efficiency of plating was determined using the concentration of phage determined from infection of the S. aureus reference strain ATCC 25923 (Drilling et al., 2014a,b, 2016).

Frontal sinus access and treatment

Animal work performed in this study was approved by the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute and the University of Adelaide Animal Ethics Committees. Access to the ovine frontal sinus was achieved through the placement of mini-trephines, as described (Ha et al., 2007). Once accessed, sinuses where flushed twice daily with 50 mL of treatment using an extension cannula for 20 days. Sheep were treated with one of three different treatments: 0.9% saline (“CONT”), 0.9% saline containing 2 × 106 pfu/mL heat-inactivated phage NOV012 (HIp) or 0.9% saline containing 2 × 106 pfu/mL active NOV012 (NOV012). Each treatment group consisted of 4 sheep. One trephine from each treatment group became blocked during the treatment, resulting in n = 7 sinuses per group. Sheep were monitored for general wellbeing during treatment. At the completion of treatment, sheep were euthanized and sinus tissue harvested for analysis. Microbiology swabs were taken to determine the bacterial composition of the sinus.

Histology and scanning electron microscopy

Mucosal sections were dissected and placed in either 10% formalin for histological analysis, or scanning electron microscopy (SEM) buffer [4% paraformaldehyde/1.25% glutaraldehyde in phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) with 4% sucrose] for SEM. For histological analysis, tissue was embedded into paraffin blocks, sectioned, mounted on slides, and stained using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Sections were examined by an experienced tissue pathologist (author CJ). Sections were identified only by a code to ensure the examining pathologist was unaware of which treatment had been provided to the animals. The examining pathologist graded the tissue for levels of inflammation, oedema, fibrosis, and presence or absence of goblet cell hyperplasia. For SEM, tissue was counterstained using 2% osmium tetroxide and dehydrated using a graded series of 70–100% ethanol washes. The tissue was chemically dried using hexamethyldisilazane (Sigma Aldrich) and mounted on SEM stub specimen mounts (Ted Pella, Redding, CA). The stubs were then coated in carbon using a standard carbon coater (Ted Pella) and viewed using an XL30 field emission Gun scanning electron microscope (Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands). Five images of each tissue section were captured at magnification 2500× where at least 50% of the image allowed visualization of the tissue surface. Each image was broken down into 2 cm2 grid sections and scored either: 1, full cilia coverage; 0.5, some cilia coverage; 0, no cilia present. Not counted, mucus covering cilia or epithelial layer, so tissue could not be visualized.

Isolation of phage from serum samples

Serum samples were collected from all sheep prior to the first treatment flush. Further, sheep in the inactivated phage group and in the control group had serum samples taken on days 7, 14 and 19 after the first flush. Phage-treated sheep had serum samples taken 10 min, and 1, 2, and 4 h after flush 1, and 18 h after the second flush. Serum samples were not found to contain phages at any of the tested time points. Therefore on days 7, 14, and 19, serum samples were harvested directly after phage flush 1 as well as 1 and 2 h post-flush 1 and 18 h post-flush 2. A mucosal sample (1 g) harvested from each phage-treated sheep on day 21 was processed and filtered as previously described (Drilling et al., 2014a). All harvested serum and mucosal samples were tested for infectious phage using the agar overlay plaque assay method. Serum (1 ml) or processed mucosal sample was mixed with cultures of S. aureus strain ATCC 25923 (cultured as above) and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. Samples were then mixed with 2 mL of 0.7% nutrient agar and overlayed onto 1% nutrient agar plates. Plates were examined every 24 h for 3 days for the presence of plaques. Agar overlays were performed in triplicate.

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23 software (IBM® SPSS® Statistics, New York, USA). Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the range of S. aureus stains that the phage preparations (P68 vs. K710 vs. cocktail) could infect and kill. All other statistical comparisons were performed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis and post-hoc with Bonferroni correction (Theodorsson-Norheim, 1986).

Results

Infection range of phages P68 and K710 against CRS-derived S. aureus clinical isolates

S. aureus isolates from 61 patients diagnosed with CRS were examined (Table (Table1).1). When tested for strain type by pulse-field gel electrophoresis, 25 different strains were identified. Each strain contained 1–6 different clonal types. Clonal types R1, R3, and T3 were observed in the isolate population more twice. When tested for susceptibility to K710, P68, and NOV012, 36/61 isolates (59%) were found sensitive to phage K710, 45 (74%) were sensitive to P68, and 52 (85%) were sensitive to NOV012 (Table (Table1).1). The cocktail was able to infect significantly more S. aureus strains compared to single K710 application (p = 0.0022). The cocktail lysed more strains compared to P68, however this was not statistically significant. Five CRS isolates were identified to be methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates. Three of the five MRSA isolates were susceptible to K710 and all five MRSA isolates were susceptible to P68. Efficiency of plating for each isolate ranged from 0.002 to 4-fold for K710, 2.7E-06 to 6.7-fold for P68 and 4E-06 to 8-fold for NOV012.

Table 1
Sensitivity of S. aureus isolates of CRS origin to bacteriophage lysis (efficiency of plating indicated in brackets).

Animal studies

Observations of sheep general health

During phage administration to sheep, there was no change in the general well-being of three out of four sheep in each of the control group and the phage group. One sheep in the control group and one in the phage group experienced some loss of appetite during the treatment period. Both sheep were found to have infections at the site of catheter insertion, which was thought to be the cause of appetite disruption. Antibiotic treatment during the treatment period, in accordance with the ethics committee-approved experimentation protocol, improved the appetite of both sheep. The general health of all four sheep treated with HIp was as expected and no change in sheep well-being was observed in this group.

Histology of sheep sinus mucosa

H&E stained tissue sections taken from sheep euthanized at the end of the treatment period (Figure (Figure1)1) were examined for inflammation, oedema, fibrosis and the presence or absence of goblet cell hyperplasia. There were no significant differences between the groups in regard to each of these parameters (data not shown).

Figure 1
Haematoxylin and eosin stained sheep nasal mucosa sections. Sections are of tissues taken from animals euthanized after 20 days of treatment as below. No differences in tissue inflammation, oedema, fibrosis and the presence or absence of goblet cell hyperplasia ...

Presence and appearance of cilia of mucosa tissue

SEM was performed to allow closer inspection of sinus mucosa cilia. Cilia of all seven sinus samples harvested from HIp treatment were able to be visualized. The cilia of one control treated sheep sample and one phage treated sample were obscured from view by mucus, hence these samples were excluded from analysis. The appearance and coverage of the cilia was similar across the groups (Figure (Figure22).

Figure 2
Representative images of sheep nasal mucosa viewed using scanning electron microscopy and analysis of cilia coverage. Cilia coverage and morphology were similar between all treatment groups including (A) control, (B) heat-inactivated NOV012 (Hip) treatment, ...

Phage detection in sheep serum

Using plaque assays, no infectious phages were detected in serum of the CONT, Hip, or NOV012-treated sheep taken at any timepoint during the experiment.

Discussion

Phage therapy has almost a 100 year history of human application for treating bacterial infections (Carlton, 1999). Accompanying this long history is an outstanding record of safety. There are numerous reports of the safety of phage therapy in animal (Soothill, 1994; Biswas et al., 2002; Wills et al., 2005; McVay et al., 2007; Hawkins et al., 2010; Park et al., 2014) and in human trials (Markoishvili et al., 2002; Bruttin and Brussow, 2005; Rhoads et al., 2009; Wright et al., 2009; Sarker et al., 2012; McCallin et al., 2013). Our previous work showed that short-term bacteriophage application is safe when applied topically to the sheep sinonasal region (Drilling et al., 2014a). This study aimed to extend this work by assessing longer-term (20 days) sinonasal phage application. This safety data is needed to support the further preclinical development of phage therapy in general and NOVO12 specifically as it is likely that phage therapy would be used in patients for an extended period of time, at least 2 weeks.

It is recognized that phage may interact with some aspects of the host immune system, and it is important to ensure they do not elicit adverse immune responses (Kaur et al., 2012). Supporting our previous work (Drilling et al., 2014a), this study shows that 20 days of topical phage therapy did not modify or damage the architecture of the sinus mucosal lining. Phage application for this extended period did not appear to increase or alter the profile of immune cells in the sinus mucosa. A limitation of this study is that only the presence of the cells was examined, whereas stimulation of the cells in relation to immune effector molecules such as cytokines was not investigated. Previous work has investigated this parameter, applying phage T4 or purified phage T4 proteins to mice and humans (Miernikiewicz et al., 2013). It was shown that such products did not stimulate the production of inflammatory related cytokines and reactive oxygen species (ROS; Miernikiewicz et al., 2013). In contrast, it has been suggested that through complex bacterial-phage-host interaction, phage can reduce ROS production (Przerwa et al., 2006; Miedzybrodzki et al., 2008). Recent research has also investigated the effect on phage infectivity when exposed to cell lines that mounted an inflammatory response to the phage. This study found that the phage still retained infectivity against bacterial cells (Khan Mirzaei et al., 2016).

It is not known whether phages can traverse the sinonasal mucosal barrier to gain access to the bloodstream. During the 20 days of treatment, no phages were detected in the bloodstream. A limitation of this study, which relied on plaque assays, is that it could not determine whether inactivated phage or phage genomes entered the bloodstream. A further limitation is that this study did not address the question of whether the sheep developed antibodies against phages. It has been shown that neutralizing antibodies may be produced following phage treatment (Kucharewicz-Krukowska and Slopek, 1987), and our future work will examine this possibility. This is of interest because it is not yet confirmed whether development of anti-phage antibodies will have a negative impact on phage therapy (Sulakvelidze et al., 2001). Recent research however has shown positive results, showing that development of antibodies may not necessarily strongly impact the clinical success of phage therapy (Zaczek et al., 2016; Lusiak-Szelachowska et al., 2017).

In addition to examining the safety profile of phage cocktail NOV012, this study also investigated the NOV012 host range in the context of CRS S. aureus infections. The findings of this study build on our previous work (Drilling et al., 2014a) that suggests using a cocktail of phage assisted in overcoming issues of matching phage to bacteria. We found that phage K710 was effective against 59% of the S. aureus strains in our panel of isolates, which was increased to 85% with addition of phage P68. Using cocktails rather than a single phage has the additional benefit of reducing the rate of generation of bacteria resistant to phage infection (Chan et al., 2013).

This work has implications beyond the treatment of CRS. For example, nasal colonization with S. aureus increases the risk of surgical wound infection (Perl and Roy, 1995). S. aureus decolonization reduces such risks (Bode et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2013), and phage have potential to achieve this. Other potential applications include topical treatment of burn wounds (Mousa, 2005) and treatment of indwelling catheter infections (Piraino, 2000). Importantly, this therapy can be broadened to target other bacterial pathogens.

Conclusions

This work confirms that the NOV012 phage cocktail infects a broad range of S. aureus isolates, including a number of MRSA isolates, from CRS patients. Further, we find that longer term (20 day) topical application of the cocktail is safe for sheep sinonasal application. This safety data supports the potential for the use of phage as a topical antimicrobial treatment in CRS and will help build the profile of the product to lead to the ability to use the product in clinical trials and eventually commercially.

Author contributions

AD executed experiments, wrote first draft. MO assisted with experiments, edited first draft. DM assisted with experiments. CJ assisted with data interpretation. PS and SV helped with experiment design, data interpretation, manuscript writing. JC helped with data interpretation. PW designed the study, manuscript writing.

Conflict of interest statement

JC is the Chief Scientific Officer of Fixed Phage Limited and provided PW with the phage used in this study. PW is a consultant for Neilmed. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Department of Surgery-Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia and by a project grant to PW from The Hospital Research Foundation, South Australia, Australia.

Glossary

Abbreviations

NOV012
Novolytics bacteriophage cocktail
Hip
Heat inactivated NOV012 bacteriophage cocktail
SEM
scanning electron microscopy
CRS
chronic rhinosinusitis.

References

  • Anwar H., Dasgupta M. K., Costerton J. W. (1990). Testing the susceptibility of bacteria in biofilms to antibacterial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34, 2043–2046. 10.1128/AAC.34.11.2043 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Baldoni D., Haschke M., Rajacic Z., Zimmerli W., Trampuz A. (2009). Linezolid alone or combined with rifampin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in experimental foreign-body infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 53, 1142–1148. 10.1128/AAC.00775-08 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Biswas B., Adhya S., Washart P., Paul B., Trostel A. N., Powell B., et al. . (2002). Bacteriophage therapy rescues mice bacteremic from a clinical isolate of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Infect. Immun. 70, 204–210. 10.1128/IAI.70.1.204-210.2002 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bode L. G., Kluytmans J. A., Wertheim H. F., Bogaers D., Vandenbroucke-Grauls C. M., Roosendaal R., et al. . (2010). Preventing surgical-site infections in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 9–17. 10.1056/NEJMoa0808939 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bruttin A., Brussow H. (2005). Human volunteers receiving Escherichia coli phage T4 orally: a safety test of phage therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 2874–2878. 10.1128/AAC.49.7.2874-2878.2005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Carlton R. M. (1999). Phage therapy: past history and future prospects. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 47, 267–274. [PubMed]
  • Carson L., Gorman S. P., Gilmore B. F. (2010). The use of lytic bacteriophages in the prevention and eradication of biofilms of Proteus mirabilis and Escherichia coli. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 59, 447–455. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00696.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cerca N., Oliveira R., Azeredo J. (2007). Susceptibility of Staphylococcus epidermidis planktonic cells and biofilms to the lytic action of staphylococcus bacteriophage K. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 45, 313–317. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02190.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chan B. K., Abedon S. T., Loc-Carrillo C. (2013). Phage cocktails and the future of phage therapy. Future microbiol. 8, 769–783. 10.2217/fmb.13.47 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chen A. F., Wessel C. B., Rao N. (2013). Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization in orthopaedic surgery and reduction of surgical site infections. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 471, 2383–2399. 10.1007/s11999-013-2875-0 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • CLSI (2012). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard. M02-A11, Vol. 32. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
  • Corbin B. D., McLean R. J., Aron G. M. (2001). Bacteriophage T4 multiplication in a glucose-limited Escherichia coli biofilm. Can. J. Microbiol. 47, 680–684. 10.1139/cjm-47-7-680 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Curtin J. J., Donlan R. M. (2006). Using bacteriophages to reduce formation of catheter-associated biofilms by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50, 1268–1275. 10.1128/AAC.50.4.1268-1275.2006 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Doolittle M. M., Cooney J. J., Caldwell D. E. (1995). Lytic infection of Escherichia coli biofilms by bacteriophage T4. Can. J. Microbiol. 41, 12–18. 10.1139/m95-002 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Drilling A. J., Cooksley C., Chan C., Wormald P. J., Vreugde S. (2016). Fighting sinus-derived Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in vitro with a bacteriophage-derived muralytic enzyme. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 6, 349–355. 10.1002/alr.21680 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Drilling A., Morales S., Boase S., Jervis-Bardy J., James C., Jardeleza C., et al. . (2014a). Safety and efficacy of topical bacteriophage and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infection in a sheep model of sinusitis. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 4, 176–186. 10.1002/alr.21270 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Drilling A., Morales S., Jardeleza C., Vreugde S., Speck P., Wormald P. J. (2014b). Bacteriophage reduces biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus ex vivo isolates from chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 28, 3–11. 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4001 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Foreman A., Wormald P. J. (2010). Different biofilms, different disease? a clinical outcomes study. Laryngoscope 120, 1701–1706. 10.1002/lary.21024 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fu W., Forster T., Mayer O., Curtin J. J., Lehman S. M., Donlan R. M. (2010). Bacteriophage cocktail for the prevention of biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa on catheters in an in vitro model system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 397–404. 10.1128/AAC.00669-09 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ha K. R., Psaltis A. J., Tan L., Wormald P. J. (2007). A sheep model for the study of biofilms in rhinosinusitis. Am. J. Rhinol. 21, 339–345. 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3032 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hawkins C., Harper D., Burch D., Anggard E., Soothill J. (2010). Topical treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa otitis of dogs with a bacteriophage mixture: a before/after clinical trial. Vet. Microbiol. 146, 309–313. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.05.014 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jervis-Bardy J., Wormald P. J. (2012). Microbiological outcomes following mupirocin nasal washes for symptomatic, Staphylococcus aureus-positive chronic rhinosinusitis following endoscopic sinus surgery. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2, 111–115. 10.1002/alr.20106 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kaur T., Nafissi N., Wasfi O., Sheldon K., Wettig S., Slavcev R. (2012). Immunocompatibility of bacteriophages as nanomedicines. J. Nanotechnol. 2012:247427 10.1155/2012/247427 [Cross Ref]
  • Khan Mirzaei M., Haileselassie Y., Navis M., Cooper C., Sverremark-Ekstrom E., Nilsson A. S. (2016). Morphologically distinct Escherichia coli bacteriophages differ in their efficacy and ability to stimulate cytokine release In vitro. Front. Microbiol. 7:437 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00437 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kucharewicz-Krukowska A., Slopek S. (1987). Immunogenic effect of bacteriophage in patients subjected to phage therapy. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 35, 553–561. [PubMed]
  • Lu T. K., Collins J. J. (2007). Dispersing biofilms with engineered enzymatic bacteriophage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 11197–11202. 10.1073/pnas.0704624104 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lusiak-Szelachowska M., Zaczek M., Weber-Dabrowska B., Miedzybrodzki R., Letkiewicz S., Fortuna W., et al. . (2017). Antiphage activity of sera during phage therapy in relation to its outcome. Future Microbial. 12, 109–117. 10.2217/fmb-2016-0156 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Markoishvili K., Tsitlanadze G., Katsarava R., Morris J. G., Jr., Sulakvelidze A. (2002). A novel sustained-release matrix based on biodegradable poly(ester amide)s and impregnated with bacteriophages and an antibiotic shows promise in management of infected venous stasis ulcers and other poorly healing wounds. Int. J. Dermatol. 41, 453–458. 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2002.01451.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • McCallin S., Alam Sarker S., Barretto C., Sultana S., Berger B., Huq S., et al. . (2013). Safety analysis of a Russian phage cocktail: from MetaGenomic analysis to oral application in healthy human subjects. Virology 443, 187–196. 10.1016/j.virol.2013.05.022 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • McVay C. S., Velasquez M., Fralick J. A. (2007). Phage therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in a mouse burn wound model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51, 1934–1938. 10.1128/AAC.01028-06 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Miedzybrodzki R., Switala-Jelen K., Fortuna W., Weber-Dabrowska B., Przerwa A., Lusiak-Szelachowska M., et al. . (2008). Bacteriophage preparation inhibition of reactive oxygen species generation by endotoxin-stimulated polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Virus Res. 131, 233–242. 10.1016/j.virusres.2007.09.013 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Miernikiewicz P., Dabrowska K., Piotrowicz A., Owczarek B., Wojas-Turek J., Kicielinska J., et al. . (2013). T4 phage and its head surface proteins do not stimulate inflammatory mediator production. PLoS ONE 8:e71036. 10.1371/journal.pone.0071036 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mousa H. A. (2005). Burn and scald injuries. East. Mediterr. Health J. 11, 1099–1109. [PubMed]
  • O'Brien F. G., Udo E. E., Grubb W. B. (2006). Contour-clamped homogeneous electric field electrophoresis of Staphylococcus aureus. Nature protoc. 1, 3028–3033. 10.1038/nprot.2006.382 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • O'Flaherty S., Coffey A., Edwards R., Meaney W., Fitzgerald G. F., Ross R. P. (2004). Genome of Staphylococcal phage K: a new lineage of Myoviridae infecting gram-positive bacteria with a low G+C content. J. Bacteriol. 186, 2862–2871. 10.1128/JB.186.9.2862-2871.2004 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Park K., Cha K. E., Myung H. (2014). Observation of inflammatory responses in mice orally fed with bacteriophage T7. J. Appl. Microbiol. 117, 627–633. 10.1111/jam.12565 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Perl T. M., Roy M. C. (1995). Postoperative wound infections: risk factors and role of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage. J. Chemother. 7(Suppl. 3), 29–35. [PubMed]
  • Petti C. A., Fowler V. G., Jr. (2003). Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis. Cardiol. Clin. 21, 219–233. [PubMed]
  • Piraino B. (2000). Staphylococcus aureus infections in dialysis patients: focus on prevention. ASAIO J. 46, S13–S17. 10.1097/00002480-200011000-00031 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Przerwa A., Zimecki M., Switala-Jelen K., Dabrowska K., Krawczyk E., Luczak M., et al. . (2006). Effects of bacteriophages on free radical production and phagocytic functions. Med. Microbiol. Immun. 195, 143–150. 10.1007/s00430-006-0011-4 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rhoads D. D., Wolcott R. D., Kuskowski M. A., Wolcott B. M., Ward L. S., Sulakvelidze A. (2009). Bacteriophage therapy of venous leg ulcers in humans: results of a phase I safety trial. J. Wound Care 18, 237–238, 240–233. 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.6.42801 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Roca I., Akova M., Baquero F., Carlet J., Cavaleri M., Coenen S., et al. . (2015). The global threat of antimicrobial resistance: science for intervention. N. Microbes N. Infect. 6, 22–29. 10.1016/j.nmni.2015.02.007 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sarker S. A., McCallin S., Barretto C., Berger B., Pittet A. C., Sultana S., et al. . (2012). Oral T4-like phage cocktail application to healthy adult volunteers from Bangladesh. Virology 434, 222–232. 10.1016/j.virol.2012.09.002 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sillankorva S., Oliveira R., Vieira M. J., Sutherland I. W., Azeredo J. (2004). Bacteriophage Phi S1 infection of Pseudomonas fluorescens planktonic cells versus biofilms. Biofouling 20, 133–138. 10.1080/08927010410001723834 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Singhal D., Foreman A., Bardy J. J., Wormald P. (2011). J. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: nemesis of endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 121, 1578–1583. 10.1002/lary.21805 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Singhal D., Psaltis A. J., Foreman A., Wormald P. J. (2010). The impact of biofilms on outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 24, 169–174. 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3462 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Soothill J. S. (1994). Bacteriophage prevents destruction of skin grafts by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Burns 20, 209–211. 10.1016/0305-4179(94)90184-8 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sulakvelidze A., Alavidze Z., Morris J. G., Jr. (2001). Bacteriophage therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 649–659. 10.1128/AAC.45.3.649-659.2001 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tait K., Skillman L. C., Sutherland I. W. (2002). The efficacy of bacteriophage as a method of biofilm eradication. Biofouling 18, 305–311. 10.1080/0892701021000034418 [Cross Ref]
  • Takac M., Blasi U. (2005). Phage P68 virion-associated protein 17 displays activity against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 2934–2940. 10.1128/AAC.49.7.2934-2940.2005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Theodorsson-Norheim E. (1986). Kruskal-Wallis test: BASIC computer program to perform nonparametric one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons on ranks of several independent samples. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed 23, 57–62. 10.1016/0169-2607(86)90081-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Vybiral D., Takac M., Loessner M., Witte A., von Ahsen U., Blasi U. (2003). Complete nucleotide sequence and molecular characterization of two lytic Staphylococcus aureus phages: 44AHJD and P68. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 219, 275–283. 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00028-4 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wills Q. F., Kerrigan C., Soothill J. S. (2005). Experimental bacteriophage protection against Staphylococcus aureus abscesses in a rabbit model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 1220–1221. 10.1128/AAC.49.3.1220-1221.2005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wright A., Hawkins C. H., Anggard E. E., Harper D. R. (2009). A controlled clinical trial of a therapeutic bacteriophage preparation in chronic otitis due to antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; a preliminary report of efficacy. Clin. Otolaryngol. 34, 349–357. 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01973.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zaczek M., Lusiak-Szelachowska M., Jonczyk-Matysiak E., Weber-Dabrowska B., Miedzybrodzki R., Owczarek B., et al. . (2016). Antibody production in response to staphylococcal ms-1 phage cocktail in patients undergoing phage therapy. Front. Microbiol. 7:1681. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01681 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ziran B. H. (2007). Osteomyelitis. J. Trauma. 62(6 Suppl.), S59–S60. 10.1097/TA.0b013e318065abbd [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA