PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of oncotargetLink to Publisher's site
 
Oncotarget. 2016 October 4; 7(40): 65660–65668.
Published online 2016 August 25. doi:  10.18632/oncotarget.11597
PMCID: PMC5323182

Activation of autophagic flux by epigallocatechin gallate mitigates TRAIL-induced tumor cell apoptosis via down-regulation of death receptors

Abstract

Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is a major polyphenol in green tea. Recent studies have reported that EGCG can inhibit TRAIL-induced apoptosis and activate autophagic flux in cancer cells. However, the mechanism behind these processes is unclear. The present study found that EGCG prevents tumor cell death by antagonizing the TRAIL pathway and activating autophagy flux. Our results indicate that EGCG dose-dependently inhibits TRAIL-induced apoptosis and decreases the binding of death receptor 4 and 5 (DR4 and 5) to TRAIL. In addition, EGCG activates autophagy flux, which is involved in the inhibition of TRAIL cell death. We confirmed that the protective effect of EGCG can be reversed using genetic and pharmacological tools through re-sensitization to TRAIL. The inhibition of autophagy flux affects not only the re-sensitization of tumor cells to TRAIL, but also the restoration of death receptor proteins. This study demonstrates that EGCG inhibits TRAIL-induced apoptosis through the manipulation of autophagic flux and subsequent decrease in number of death receptors. On the basis of these results, we suggest further consideration of the use of autophagy activators such as EGCG in combination anti-tumor therapy with TRAIL.

Keywords: EGCG, autophagy, TRAIL, death receptor

INTRODUCTION

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-cancer therapeutic agent that can induce apoptotic cell death [13]. Recent studies have found that TRAIL can bind to decoy receptors (1 and 2) and inhibit the activation of apoptosis [4]. TRAIL also subsequently recruits FADD and activates caspase-8, thus inducing the apoptotic pathway [5]. An increase in death receptor (DR) protein levels is associated with survival in patients with colon cancer [6, 7]. TRAIL has been shown to induce apoptotic cell death in various cancer cells by binding to death receptor 4 and 5 (DR4 and 5) and activating the extrinsic apoptosis pathway [8]. However, most normal cells are relatively resistant to TRAIL treatment [9, 10], indicating that TRAIL can selectively induce apoptotic cell death after activating death receptors.

Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is the most abundant polyphenol in green tea. Major green tea catechins such as epigallocatechin (EGC; 3–6%), epicatechin-3-gallate (ECG; 3–6%), epicatechin (EC; 1–3%), and catechins (C; less than 1%) have been used both in the human diet and topical therapy for several pathological conditions related to oxidative stress or UVB radiation [11, 12]. EGCG can induce apoptotic cell death, and thus inhibit the migration and invasion of human cervical cancer cells [13]. In addition, EGCG can inhibit the proliferation of glioma cells and decrease their invasive activities [14]. EGCG has been found to induce ROS generation and activate p38 MAP kinase in human endometrial adenocarcinoma cells [15]. However, recent studies have also found that EGCG can activate autophagic flux in many types of cells (including cancer cells) and protect neurodegeneration in primary neuron cells [1618]. These results have demonstrated that EGCG plays a role in the protection of a variety of cells involved in autophagy activation.

The activation of autophagic flux can inhibit TRAIL-induced apoptosis in TRAIL-resistant cells [19, 20]. Autophagy, known as the lysosomal degradation process, can induce cell death and cell survival [21]. Autophagy plays an important role in cellular homeostasis by deleting long-lived proteins, misfolded proteins, and intracellular organelles. Immoderate autophagy can induce cellular destruction [22, 23]. In addition, autophagic flux can prevent cell death during hypoxia, starvation, growth factor deprivation, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and microbial infection [24]. However, activation of autophagic flux is also associated with cell death resulting from caspase activation, lysosomal membrane permeabilization, and dysfunction of mitochondrial membrane potential [25]. Autophagic cell death is induced by the accumulation of autophagic organelles, including autophagosomes and autophagolysosomes, in neurodegenerative diseases [22, 23, 26]. P62/SQSTM1 plays an important role as an autophagy marker in the degradation of polyubiquitinated substrates by autophagy flux, thus causing its own degradation [27]. It has been demonstrated that TRAIL-resistant cells exhibit high autophagic flux with increased clearance of p62 protein, while TRAIL-sensitive cells has low autophagic flux and accumulation of p62 [28]. Moreover, p62 protein can bind to DISC and enhance the activation, aggregation, and processing of caspase-8, a known pro-apoptotic factor [29]. The objective of this study was to determine whether EGCG treatment could down-regulate the protein levels of death receptors and activate autophagy flux in human colon cancer cells. Our results showed that EGCG-induced autophagy flux activation inhibits TRAIL-induced apoptosis by regulating DR5.

RESULTS

EGCG protected TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HCT116 cells

To determine the effect of EGCG treatment on TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HCT116 human colorectal cancer cells, changes in cell morphology and viability were monitored using light microscopy, crystal violet assay, and LDH release assay. After the cells were pretreated with the indicated doses of EGCG for 12 h, they were treated with TRAIL for an additional 2 h. TRAIL treatment markedly increased cell death, indicating that HCT116 cells were sensitive to TRAIL treatment. Additionally, EGCG inhibited TRAIL-induced cell death in a dose-dependent manner. Cell morphology data showed that the combination of TRAIL and EGCG decreased the number of apoptotic cells compared to TRAIL treatment alone (Figure (Figure1A).1A). EGCG and TRAIL co-treatment increased cell viability and decreased LDH release (Figure 1B-1D). Overall, these data indicate that EGCG treatment inhibits TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HCT116 human colon cancer cells.

Figure 1
EGCG protected TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HCT116 cells

EGCG decreased the protein levels of death receptors

Recent studies have reported that TRAIL can bind with specific receptors such as DR4 (also known as TRAIL-R1) and DR5 (also known as TRAIL-R2) [4, 30]. To examine the effect of EGCG on TRAIL-related death receptor protein levels, we treated HCT116 cells with different doses of EGCG for 12 h. Western blot analysis showed that DR4 and 5 protein levels were decreased after treatment with EGCG in a dose-dependent manner (Figure (Figure2A2A and and2B).2B). As shown in Figure Figure2C2C and and2D,2D, EGCG and TRAIL co-treatment decreased the production of the activated form of apoptotic factors, such as caspase-8, as compared to treatment with TRAIL alone.

Figure 2
EGCG decreased the protein levels of death receptors

EGCG stimulated autophagic flux

Some studies have implicated autophagic flux in the activation of apoptotic signaling factors such as cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-8 in TRAIL-induced apoptosis [29, 31, 32]. Therefore, we evaluated the induction of autophagic flux markers such as microtubule-associated light chain 3 (LC3) and p62 proteins using western blot analysis and immunofluorescence staining. Western blot analysis revealed that the protein level of both p62 and LC3-II was decreased by EGCG treatment in a dose-dependent manner (Figure (Figure3A3A and and3B).3B). During the autophagy process, LC3-I is converted into its autophagosomal membrane form LC3-II, which is the most reliable marker for autophagy activation [33]. p62 protein can facilitate the degradation of poly-ubiquitinated proteins or organelles, and thus cause its own degradation. Therefore, decreased levels of p62 protein will induce the activation of autophagy and autophagic degradation [27]. Our western blot data indicates that EGCG treatment induces autophagic flux in HCT116 human colon cancer cells. Immunofluorescence staining confirms that EGCG treatment decreased the accumulation of p62 protein (Figure (Figure3C).3C). Collectively, these results demonstrate that EGCG induces autophagic flux in human colon cancer cells, rendering them resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis.

Figure 3
EGCG stimulated autophagy flux

Inhibition of autophagy sensitized TRAIL-induced apoptosis on EGCG treatment

Next, we examined the effect of a combined treatment of EGCG and chloroquine, a known autophagy inhibitor, on TRAIL treatment. HCT116 cells were pretreated with 50 nM chloroquine for 6 h and exposed to EGCG for 12 h. Cells were then treated with 100 ng/ml TRAIL for 2 h. Cell morphology, cell viability, and LDH release were monitoring using light microscopy and a crystal violet assay. Pharmacological inhibition of autophagy by chloroquine in the presence of EGCG sensitized HCT116 cells to TRAIL-induced cell death, compared to EGCG alone (Figure 4A-4D). The activated form of caspase-8, a known pro-apoptotic factor, was induced by chloroquine in cells co-treated with EGCG and TRAIL (Figure (Figure4E).4E). These data indicate that inhibition of autophagy increases TRAIL-related pro-apoptotic signaling in HCT116 cells.

Figure 4
Inhibition of autophagy sensitized tumor cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis on EGCG treatment

Inhibition of autophagic flux recovered the down-regulation of death receptors induced by EGCG treatment

Next, we investigated whether death receptor DR4 and DR5 protein concentrations are correlated with inhibition of autophagic flux, by using western blot analysis. We confirmed that chloroquine could inhibit autophagic flux (Figure 5A-5C). Next, we examined the effect of chloroquine on death receptors. Western blot analysis data revealed that chloroquine increases the protein levels of death receptors (Figure (Figure5D).5D). These results demonstrate that autophagy can be inhibited by chloroquine-enhanced, TRAIL-induced apoptosis via death receptors.

Figure 5
Inhibition of autophagic flux blocked the down-regulation of death receptors induced by EGCG treatment

Genetic inhibition of autophagic flux promoted TRAIL-induced cell death upon EGCG treatment

To determine whether EGCG-induced autophagy plays a protective role against TRAIL-induced apoptosis, we used ATG5 siRNA to study the effect of autophagy inhibition on TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HCT116 cells. The Atg12-Atg5-Atg16 complex is associated with the formation of the autophagosome, while LC3, also known as ATG8, is an autophagy marker lapidated during the induction of autophagic flux and is required for autophagosome formation [34, 35]. Cells were pretreated with 20 nM ATG5 siRNA for 24 h followed by treatment with EGCG for 12 h with or without co-treatment with 100 ng/ml TRAIL for 2 h. Based on cell morphology, ATG5 siRNA inhibited the effect of EGCG treatment on TRAIL-induced apoptosis (Figure (Figure6A).6A). The sensitivity of HCT116 cells to TRAIL-induced cell death was further studied using crystal violet and LDH assays. Our results show that ATG5 siRNA decreased cell viability but increased LDH levels (Figure 6B-6D). Functional knockdown of siRNA was confirmed by western blot data showing the down-regulation of ATG5 protein by ATG5 siRNA (Figure (Figure6E).6E). Next, we determined whether ATG5 siRNA increased the activation of caspase-8, our representative pro-apoptotic factor, using western blot analysis. The ATG5 siRNA in HCT116 cells increased the induction of cleaved caspase-8 after treatment with EGCG and TRAIL, and decreased the conversion of LC3-II protein (Figure (Figure6E).6E). These results demonstrate that genetic inhibition of autophagy by ATG5 siRNA enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis and inhibits autophagic flux in HCT116 cells.

Figure 6
Genetic inhibition of autophagic flux promotes TRAIL-induced cell death upon EGCG treatment

DISCUSSION

TRAIL can induce apoptosis in various cancer cells. However, some cancer cells are not affected by TRAIL treatment [36]. The goal of this study was to overcome TRAIL-resistance by regulating death receptors and autophagic flux using EGCG. Our present study suggests that EGCG can activate autophagic flux in TRAIL-induced apoptosis by down-regulating death receptors and inhibiting TRAIL-induced mitochondrial dysfunction.

Recent studies have shown that EGCG treatment can protect against neurodegenerative disorders induced by prp106-126 by activating autophagic flux [16]. It has been demonstrated that autophagic flux is involved in TRAIL-induced apoptosis, and that the activation of autophagy can protect against TRAIL-induced cell death [19, 24]. However, the relationship between EGCG and an anti-cancer drug such as TRAIL has not been studied in any cancer cells until now.

Autophagy occurs in all nucleated type cells. It is a process essential to many cells, including animals, plants, and yeasts [3739]. Activation of autophagy has been shown to prevent cell death in PCa cells, while inhibition of autophagy can enhance reagent-induced cell death [40, 41]. In this study, we showed that EGCG treatment activated autophagic flux and markedly decreased the protein levels of death receptors DR4 and DR5 (Figure (Figure22 and Figure Figure3).3). To confirm that EGCG inhibited TRAIL-induced cell death via activation of autophagic flux, we used pharmacological (chloroquine) or genetic (ATG5-specific siRNA) inhibition of autophagy-sensitized TRAIL-induced cell death to compare with EGCG treatment alone (Figure (Figure44 and Figure Figure6).6). Inhibition of autophagic flux was found to increase protein levels of death receptors compared to treatment with EGCG (Figure (Figure5).5). These results indicate that EGCG might play an active role in cancer suppression, as it mediates the down-regulation of death receptors via activation of autophagic flux.

Many characteristics of autophagy activation are also exploited by cancer cells [28, 42]. Therefore, autophagy is an important target for cancer therapy. We found that EGCG treatment inhibited TRAIL-induced apoptosis and activated autophagic flux in HCT116 human colon cancer cells. Inhibition of autophagic flux by chloroquine and ATG5 siRNA antagonized the protective effect of EGCG. These results demonstrate that EGCG can protect against TRAIL-induced cell death by regulating autophagic flux in TRAIL-sensitive HCT116 cells. These observations collectively suggest that EGCG treatment might have beneficial side effects in anti-cancer therapy by activating autophagic flux and thus down-regulating death receptors. Therefore, we recommend that autophagy inhibitor be combined with another anti-cancer drug such as TRAIL in human cancer cells because of possible disturbances to the autophagic pathway.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture

Human colon carcinoma cell line HCT116 was maintained in RPMI1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen-Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 100 μg/ml penicillin-streptomycin in a humidified incubator maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Protein isolation and western blotting

Proteins were subjected to 10-15% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and subjected to western blotting as described previously [43]. Antibodies used for immunoblotting were specific for Bax (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); caspase-8, p62, LC3, ATG5 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), DR4, DR5, and β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA).

Crystal violet assay

Cells were seeded at 1×104 cells/well into 12-well plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Cells were pretreated with chloroquine for 6 h, EGCG for 12 h, and incubated with recombinant TRAIL for an additional 2 h. Cell morphology was examined using an inverted microscope (Nikon, Japan). Cell viability was determined using the crystal violet staining method as described previously [44]. Briefly, cells were stained for 10 min at room temperature with a staining solution (0.5% crystal violet in 30% ethanol and 3% formaldehyde), washed four times with water, and dried. Cells were then lysed with 1% SDS solution. Absorbance was measured at 550 nm. Cell viability was calculated based on relative dye intensity of treated cells compared to that of non-treated control cells.

Lactate dehydrogenase assay

Cytotoxicity was assessed using cell supernatant and LDH Cytotoxicity Detection kit (Takara Bio, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol. LDH activity was determined based on absorbance at 490 nm.

Immunofluorescence staining

Cells cultured on glass coverslips were treated with EGCG and chloroquine under normoxia. Cells were washed with PBS and fixed with cold acetone for 90 sec at room temperature. These cells were washed with PBS again, blocked with 5% fetal bovine serum in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20, and incubated with monoclonal antibodies against p62 for 24 h at room temperature. Unbound antibody was removed by an additional wash with PBS. Cells were then incubated with anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 546 (for anti-p62) IgG antibody (4μg/ml) and anti-rabbit Alexa Flour 488 (for anti-LC3, DR5 and cleaved-caspase3) for 2 h at room temperature. Cells were then mounted with DakoCytomation medium and visualized using fluorescence microscope.

RNA interference

HCT116 cells were transfected with ATG5-specific small interfering RNA (siRNA; Stealth RNAi, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were plated into 24-well plates, pretreated with 20 nM ATG5 siRNA for 24 h, and incubated with recombinant TRAIL (0-100 ng/ml) for an additional 3 h under the same conditions. Scrambled ATG5 siRNA (Invitrogen) was used as negative control.

Statistics

All data were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons were performed using Student's t-test and ANOVA Duncan test with SAS statistical package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05 (*) or p < 0.01 (**).

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MISP) (2016R1A2B2009293).

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Leong S, Cohen RB, Gustafson DL, Langer CJ, Camidge DR, Padavic K, Gore L, Smith M, Chow LQ, von Mehren M, O'Bryant C, Hariharan S, Diab S, Fox NL, Miceli R, Eckhardt SG. Mapatumumab an antibody targeting TRAIL-R1 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced solid malignancies: results of a phase I and pharmacokinetic study. Journal of clinical oncology. 2009;27:4413–4421. [PubMed]
2. Stegehuis JH, de Wilt LH, de Vries EG, Groen HJ, de Jong S, Kruyt FA. TRAIL receptor targeting therapies for non-small cell lung cancer: current status and perspectives. Drug resistance updates. 2010;13:2–15. [PubMed]
3. Hellwig CT, Rehm M. TRAIL signaling and synergy mechanisms used in TRAIL-based combination therapies. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2012;11:3–13. [PubMed]
4. Pan G, Ni J, Wei YF, Yu G, Gentz R, Dixit VM. An antagonist decoy receptor and a death domain-containing receptor for TRAIL. Science (New York NY) 1997;277:815–818. [PubMed]
5. Kischkel FC, Lawrence DA, Chuntharapai A, Schow P, Kim KJ, Ashkenazi A. Apo2L/TRAIL-dependent recruitment of endogenous FADD and caspase-8 to death receptors 4 and 5. Immunity. 2000;12:611–620. [PubMed]
6. Salim T, Sjolander A, Sand-Dejmek J. Nuclear expression of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta and lack of membranous beta-catenin is correlated with poor survival in colon cancer. International journal of cancer. 2013;133:807–815. [PubMed]
7. van Geelen CM, Westra JL, de Vries EG, Boersma-van Ek W, Zwart N, Hollema H, Boezen HM, Mulder NH, Plukker JT, de Jong S, Kleibeuker JH, Koornstra JJ. Prognostic significance of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and its receptors in adjuvantly treated stage III colon cancer patients. Journal of clinical oncology. 2006;24:4998–5004. [PubMed]
8. Abdulghani J, El-Deiry WS. TRAIL receptor signaling and therapeutics. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. 2010;14:1091–1108. [PubMed]
9. Chen X, Thakkar H, Tyan F, Gim S, Robinson H, Lee C, Pandey SK, Nwokorie C, Onwudiwe N, Srivastava RK. Constitutively active Akt is an important regulator of TRAIL sensitivity in prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2001;20:6073–6083. [PubMed]
10. Walczak H, Miller RE, Ariail K, Gliniak B, Griffith TS, Kubin M, Chin W, Jones J, Woodward A, Le T, Smith C, Smolak P, Goodwin RG, Rauch CT, Schuh JC, Lynch DH. Tumoricidal activity of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in vivo. Nature medicine. 1999;5:157–163. [PubMed]
11. Katiyar SK, Afaq F, Perez A, Mukhtar H. Green tea polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate treatment of human skin inhibits ultraviolet radiation-induced oxidative stress. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:287–294. [PubMed]
12. Katiyar SK, Elmets CA. Green tea polyphenolic antioxidants and skin photoprotection (Review) International journal of oncology. 2001;18:1307–1313. [PubMed]
13. Sharma C, Nusri Qel A, Begum S, Javed E, Rizvi TA, Hussain A. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate induces apoptosis and inhibits invasion and migration of human cervical cancer cells. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention. 2012;13:4815–4822. [PubMed]
14. Li H, Li Z, Xu YM, Wu Y, Yu KK, Zhang C, Ji YH, Ding G, Chen FX. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate induces apoptosis inhibits proliferation and decreases invasion of glioma cell. Neuroscience bulletin. 2014;30:67–73. [PubMed]
15. Manohar M, Fatima I, Saxena R, Chandra V, Sankhwar PL, Dwivedi A. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate induces apoptosis in human endometrial adenocarcinoma cells via ROS generation and p38 MAP kinase activation. The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2013;24:940–947. [PubMed]
16. Lee JH, Moon JH, Kim SW, Jeong JK, Nazim UM, Lee YJ, Seol JW, Park SY. EGCG-mediated autophagy flux has a neuroprotection effect via a class III histone deacetylase in primary neuron cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6:9701–9717. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3832. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Li CP, Yao J, Tao ZF, Li XM, Jiang Q, Yan B. Epigallocatechin-gallate (EGCG) regulates autophagy in human retinal pigment epithelial cells: a potential role for reducing UVB light-induced retinal damage. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2013;438:739–745. [PubMed]
18. Yamagata K, Xie Y, Suzuki S, Tagami M. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits VCAM-1 expression and apoptosis induction associated with LC3 expressions in TNFalpha-stimulated human endothelial cells. Phytomedicine: international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology. 2015;22:431–437. [PubMed]
19. Mora R, Abschuetz A, Kees T, Dokic I, Joschko N, Kleber S, Geibig R, Mosconi E, Zentgraf H, Martin-Villalba A, Regnier-Vigouroux A. TNF-alpha- and TRAIL-resistant glioma cells undergo autophagy-dependent cell death induced by activated microglia. Glia. 2009;57:561–581. [PubMed]
20. Herrero-Martin G, Hoyer-Hansen M, Garcia-Garcia C, Fumarola C, Farkas T, Lopez-Rivas A, Jaattela M. TAK1 activates AMPK-dependent cytoprotective autophagy in TRAIL-treated epithelial cells. The EMBO journal. 2009;28:677–685. [PubMed]
21. Kroemer G, Marino G, Levine B. Autophagy and the integrated stress response. Molecular cell. 2010;40:280–293. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science (New York NY) 2000;290:1717–1721. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Petersen A, Larsen KE, Behr GG, Romero N, Przedborski S, Brundin P, Sulzer D. Expanded CAG repeats in exon 1 of the Huntington's disease gene stimulate dopamine-mediated striatal neuron autophagy and degeneration. Human molecular genetics. 2001;10:1243–1254. [PubMed]
24. Kourtis N, Tavernarakis N. Autophagy and cell death in model organisms. Cell death and differentiation. 2009;16:21–30. [PubMed]
25. Kroemer G, Jaattela M. Lysosomes and autophagy in cell death control. Nature reviews Cancer. 2005;5:886–897. [PubMed]
26. Selimi F, Lohof AM, Heitz S, Lalouette A, Jarvis CI, Bailly Y, Mariani J. Lurcher GRID2-induced death and depolarization can be dissociated in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neuron. 2003;37:813–819. [PubMed]
27. Itakura E, Mizushima N. p62 Targeting to the autophagosome formation site requires self-oligomerization but not LC3 binding. The Journal of cell biology. 2011;192:17–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Singh K, Sharma A, Mir MC, Drazba JA, Heston WD, Magi-Galluzzi C, Hansel D, Rubin BP, Klein EA, Almasan A. Autophagic flux determines cell death and survival in response to Apo2L/TRAIL (dulanermin) Molecular cancer. 2014;13:70. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Jin Z, Li Y, Pitti R, Lawrence D, Pham VC, Lill JR, Ashkenazi A. Cullin3-based polyubiquitination and p62-dependent aggregation of caspase-8 mediate extrinsic apoptosis signaling. Cell. 2009;137:721–735. [PubMed]
30. Sheridan JP, Marsters SA, Pitti RM, Gurney A, Skubatch M, Baldwin D, Ramakrishnan L, Gray CL, Baker K, Wood WI, Goddard AD, Godowski P, Ashkenazi A. Control of TRAIL-induced apoptosis by a family of signaling and decoy receptors. Science (New York NY) 1997;277:818–821. [PubMed]
31. Wagner KW, Punnoose EA, Januario T, Lawrence DA, Pitti RM, Lancaster K, Lee D, von Goetz M, Yee SF, Totpal K, Huw L, Katta V, Cavet G, Hymowitz SG, Amler L, Ashkenazi A. Death-receptor O-glycosylation controls tumor-cell sensitivity to the proapoptotic ligand Apo2L/TRAIL. Nature medicine. 2007;13:1070–1077. [PubMed]
32. Hughes MA, Harper N, Butterworth M, Cain K, Cohen GM, MacFarlane M. Reconstitution of the death-inducing signaling complex reveals a substrate switch that determines CD95-mediated death or survival. Molecular cell. 2009;35:265–279. [PubMed]
33. Kabeya Y, Mizushima N, Ueno T, Yamamoto A, Kirisako T, Noda T, Kominami E, Ohsumi Y, Yoshimori T. LC3 a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. The EMBO journal. 2000;19:5720–5728. [PubMed]
34. Nakatogawa H, Ichimura Y, Ohsumi Y. Atg8 a ubiquitin-like protein required for autophagosome formation mediates membrane tethering and hemifusion. Cell. 2007;130:165–178. [PubMed]
35. Xie Z, Nair U, Klionsky DJ. Atg8 controls phagophore expansion during autophagosome formation. Molecular biology of the cell. 2008;19:3290–3298. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Voelkel-Johnson C, Hannun YA, El-Zawahry A. Resistance to TRAIL is associated with defects in ceramide signaling that can be overcome by exogenous C6-ceramide without requiring down-regulation of cellular FLICE inhibitory protein. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2005;4:1320–1327. [PubMed]
37. Noda T, Matsuura A, Wada Y, Ohsumi Y. Novel system for monitoring autophagy in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1995;210:126–132. [PubMed]
38. Aubert S, Gout E, Bligny R, Marty-Mazars D, Barrieu F, Alabouvette J, Marty F, Douce R. Ultrastructural and biochemical characterization of autophagy in higher plant cells subjected to carbon deprivation: control by the supply of mitochondria with respiratory substrates. The Journal of cell biology. 1996;133:1251–1263. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Reunanen H, Punnonen EL, Hirsimaki P. Studies on vinblastine-induced autophagocytosis in mouse liver V A cytochemical study on the origin of membranes. Histochemistry. 1985;83:513–517. [PubMed]
40. Wu Z, Chang PC, Yang JC, Chu CY, Wang LY, Chen NT, Ma AH, Desai SJ, Lo SH, Evans CP, Lam KS, Kung HJ. Autophagy Blockade Sensitizes Prostate Cancer Cells towards Src Family Kinase Inhibitors. Genes cancer. 2010;1:40–49. doi: 10.1177/1947601909358324. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Chhipa RR, Wu Y, Ip C. AMPK-mediated autophagy is a survival mechanism in androgen-dependent prostate cancer cells subjected to androgen deprivation and hypoxia. Cellular signalling. 2011;23:1466–1472. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Huang WW, Tsai SC, Peng SF, Lin MW, Chiang JH, Chiu YJ, Fushiya S, Tseng MT, Yang JS. Kaempferol induces autophagy through AMPK and AKT signaling molecules and causes G2/M arrest via downregulation of CDK1/cyclin B in SK-HEP-1 human hepatic cancer cells. International journal of oncology. 2013;42:2069–2077. [PubMed]
43. Jeong JK, Moon MH, Seol JW, Seo JS, Lee YJ, Park SY. Prion peptide-mediated cellular prion protein overexpression and neuronal cell death can be blocked by aspirin treatment. International journal of molecular medicine. 2011;27:689–693. [PubMed]
44. Seo JS, Seol JW, Moon MH, Jeong JK, Lee YJ, Park SY. Hypoxia protects neuronal cells from human prion protein fragment-induced apoptosis. Journal of neurochemistry. 2010;112:715–722. [PubMed]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC