PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of currgenoLink to Publisher's site
 
Curr Genomics. 2017 February; 18(1): 60–74.
Published online 2017 February. doi:  10.2174/1389202917666160803160934
PMCID: PMC5321769

Compounds From Celastraceae Targeting Cancer Pathways and Their Potential Application in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is one of the most common cancer types worldwide. It initiates on the epithelial lining of the upper aerodigestive tract, at most instances as a consequence of tobacco and alcohol consumption. Treatment options based on conventional therapies or targeted therapies under development have limited efficacy due to multiple genetic alterations typically found in this cancer type. Natural products derived from plants often possess biological activities that may be valuable in the development of new therapeutic agents for cancer treatment. Several genera from the family Celastraceae have been studied in this context. This review reports studies on chemical constituents isolated from species from the Celastraceae family targeting cancer mechanisms studied to date. These results are then correlated with molecular characteristics of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in an attempt to identify constituents with potential application in the treatment of this complex disease at the molecular level.

Keywords: Celastraceae, Triterpenoids, Quinone-methides, Cancer, Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Targeted therapy

1. INTRODUCTION

Cancer presently accounts for approximately 8 million deaths per year worldwide, a number that should escalate in the next two decades according to current projections [1]. Considered a global health problem, great scientific efforts are being made in order to understand the burden of cancer and prevent an even worse scenario.

In the past 10 years, the PubMed searchable databases alone have registered over a million articles addressing cancer [2]. Results show that despite improvements in early diagnosis and treatment, most cancer patients are still lacking treatment options and that success rates in drug development are low [3, 4].

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is responsible for about 90% of the cancers arising in the epithelial lining of the mucosal surfaces of the head and neck [5]. It is considered the sixth most prevalent cancer type worldwide, with approximately 540,000 new cases annually and 271,000 deaths, mostly due to lack of early diagnostic markers and efficient therapies [6]. Major risk factors include heavy drinking and tobacco consumption [7] and the human papilloma virus for certain HNSCC subsites [8]. Most patients are diagnosed at advanced cancer stages. At this point treatment requires complex surgeries followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, with severe consequences in speech, breathing and eating abilities [9, 10]. Noteworthy is the fact that over 50% of patients will present recurrence in less than 2 years after initial treatment with overall survival between 6 and 12 months [11, 12]. The molecular complexity of this cancer type is certainly the major drawback for the development of more efficient therapies. The use of biologically active molecules acting upon distinct cellular processes could be a desirable alternative for therapy.

Compounds isolated from plants have traditionally been considered for their medicinal properties [13]. Several commercially available drugs for cancer were developed using bioactive molecules originally isolated from plant extracts, including Velban® (also known as vinblastine, originally isolated from Catharanthus roseus G. Don), Oncovin® (generically known as vincristine, it was originally obtained from Catharanthus roseus G. Don), Taxol® (paclitaxel, originally obtained from Taxus brevifolia), Eldisine® (also known as vindesine, originally obtained from Catharanthus roseus G. Don), Navelbine® (known as vinorelbine, obtained from Catharanthus roseus G. Don),
Taxotere® (generically known as Docetaxel, a semisynthetic compound derived from bacatin III, which was originally isolated from Taxus baccata needles), Vepesid® (also known as etoposide, it is a semisynthetic analogue of podophyllotoxin obtained from the root of Podophyllum peltatum), Vumon® (known as teniposide, it is a semisynthetic analogue of podophyllotoxin obtained from the root of Podophyllum peltatum), Camptosar® (known as irinotecan, a semisynthetic analogue of the natural alkaloid camptothecin originally isolated from the bark and stem of Camptotheca acuminate) and Hycamtin® (also known as topotecan, a synthetic analog of the natural chemical compound camptothecin originally obtained from Camptotheca acuminata), as reviewed else where [14, 15].

The Celastraceae family is among those greatly investigated for antineoplastic effects. It comprises around 100 genera and 1300 species, most of them distributed in the tropical and sub tropical regions of South America as well as in eastern Asia [16, 17]. This review presents a comprehensible collection of articles addressing the antineoplastic effect of Celastraceae plant extracts and/or chemical constituents. Genes and proteins reportedly targeted by these molecules and associated with deregulated signaling pathways in cancer are reported and special emphasis was given to HNSCC molecular features. The final aim was to tackle if plant extracts or constituents isolated from species of the Celastraceae family could be considered potential new sources for therapeutics development for this kind of cancer.

2. OVERVIEW OF PUBLICATIONS ON CELASTRACEAE AND CANCER

In order to identify research articles possibly associating Celastraceae and cancer the PubMed searchable database (accessing mostly journals indexed in the MEDLINE database, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), the repository PubMed Central (PMC) and the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) were used. The general terms Celastraceae (all fields) AND Cancer (Title/Abstract) were used in all instances. Publications automatically selected following the criteria described above were manually curated and only those presenting in vitro reports on molecular mechanisms of action of extracts and/or compounds isolated from species of the Celastraceae family were further discussed in this review. Publications reporting only cytotoxicity and cell proliferation results, reviews, retracted articles, articles published in any language other than English, and studies reporting only results other than antineoplastic-related effects were excluded. Reports found using more than one database were included only once in the total number of publications.

A total of 101 publications associating Celastraceae and cancer were identified using the search engines and electronic databases selected for this review. Most literature (61 reports, 83% of all results) was retrieved through PubMed, followed by PubMed Central (14,8%). Of these potentially useful publications, 27 were kept for further discussion in this review since they matched the final selection criteria. Only 2 publications were identified in SciELO, but they did not qualify for further analysis.

In summary, of 101 publications found using the terms “cancer” and “Celastraceae”, 73% were excluded. Twenty-six of them were reports on the potential use of Celastraceae-related natural compounds for other diseases or the evaluation of specific properties of compounds isolated from species of the Celastraceae family not directly associated with cancer. Several publications focused on extraction and purification protocols of bioactive molecules, and therefore were dismissed. A total of 27 publications were selected for full-text reading. The selection results are represented in (Fig. 11).

Fig. (1)
Summary of screening results for publications associating Celastraceae and cancer

The 27 selected reports were published between 2005 and 2014, but most of them were published in 2008, 2012 and 2013. Prior to 2005 most publications did not report specific mechanisms of action for the studied biomolecules and were not, therefore, included in this review. China is responsible for 48% of the publications, possibly due to the widespread use of traditional medicine, often based on plant extracts, in that country. The USA appears as the second country with highest number of publications (24%). The remaining of the publications came from Brazil, Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam.

3. THE ANTI-CANCER POTENTIAL OF COMPOUNDS ISOLATED FROM SPECIES OF THE CELASTRACEAE FAMILY

Accumulating evidence presented in this review indicates that several species from the Celastraceae family are potential sources of molecules that may interfere in the progression of cancer. The most studied cancer types were prostate and colon cancer, with 17% of the studies, followed by breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic cancer, with 13% of the studies each (Fig. 22). One of the approaches for studying the anti-cancer activities of plant extracts and bioactive molecules is to directly address signaling pathways commonly deregulated in cancer. A comprehensive summary of current results using this approach is shown in (Table (Table1 ).1 ). As shown, ten Celastraceae species were studied in the literature reviewed in this work: Celastrus paniculatus, Celastrus hypoleucus, Salacia cochinchinensis, Maytenus ilicifolia, Tripterygium wilfordii, Tripterygium regelii, Tripterygium hypoglaucum, Euonymus alatus, Microtropis fokienensis and Perrottetia arisanensis. The genus Tripterygium was the most frequently studied, followed by Celastrus and Maytenus. These species can be considered source of at least three classes of molecules: terpenoids, alkaloids and polyphenols. Most studies (92%) focused on the anti-tumoral activities of terpenoids. Terpenoids constitute a large and diverse group of naturally occurring products. They are essentially lipids, built up of isopropene units, but differ in their carbon skeleton and functional groups, characteristics responsible for their specific effects in biological systems. Three terpenoids were most cited in the selected studies: sesquiterpenoids, diterpenoids, and triterpenoids, with 4%, 39% and 57% of the citations respectively.

Fig. (2)
Cancer types potentially treatable by compounds isolated from species of the Celastraceae family and the percentage of reports addressing each cancer type according to the reports retrieved.
Table 1
Studies addressing the anti-cancer potential of Celastraceae through their effect on commonly deregulated genes and/or proteins in cancer.

Among diterpenoids, triptolide, the principal bioactive ingredient of Tripterygium wilfordii, has a unique structure leading to multiple biological activities [18]. According to reports, triptolide directly induces tumor cell apoptosis, but can also enhance apoptosis induced by cytotoxic agents (e.g. TNF-α and TRAIL) and chemotherapeutic agents by inhibiting NFκB activation [19]. The design and synthesis of triptolide derivatives have been motivated owed to its high potential but limited clinical use due to severe toxicity and water-insolubility. As a matter of fact, PG490-88, a derivative of triptolide, is part of a phase I clinical trial for treatment of prostate cancer in the USA [19].

The most studied triterpenoids are quinone-methides (85% of the studies on triterpenoids). Quinone-methides are common constituents of biological systems and some possess important biological activities, including DNA alkylation and DNA cross-linking [20]. In fact, oxidation to a reactive quinone-methide is the mechanistic basis of many phenolic anti-cancer drugs [21, 22]. Quinone-methides obtained from natural sources are among the most promising chemical classes for the development of new drugs against cancer [23, 24]. Naturally occurring quinone-methide triterpenoids can only be found as secondary metabolites in plants of the Celastraceae family [25]. Despite their broad pharmacological potential, including anti-cancer effects, these compounds cannot be obtained by chemical synthesis yet. Extraction from plants remains the only feasible strategy and biotechnological techniques, such as in vitro culture of cells, may become an alternative source in the future [25].

Celastrol and its methyl ester, pristimerin, are the most studied triterpenoid quinone-methides in cancer (Table (Table2 ).2 ). Originally extracted from the root bark of T. wilfordii, an ivy, vine-like plant native to China, Japan and Korea, these compounds are currently obtained from several other species. The chemical structure of the three most studied compounds obtained from species of the Celastraceae family, namely triptolide, celastrol and pristimerin, are depicted in (Fig. 33 ).

Fig. (3)
Chemical structure of triptolide (1), celastrol (2) and pristimerin (3), originally isolated from species of the Celastraceae family. ChemDraw 12.0 software (currently available through PerkinElmer) was used to draw these structures.
Table 2
Celastrol and pristimerin in cancer.

4. PRISTIMERIN, CELASTROL AND TRIPTOLIDE: MOLECULAR FUNCTIONS AND MECHANISMS IN CANCER

The triterpenes quinone-methides celastrol and pristimerin and the diterpenoid triptolide are the most studied molecules isolated from species of the Celastraceae family in regard to molecular mechanisms associated with anti-cancer effects.

Triterpene quinone-methides have been found to actively inhibit choline kinase-α, a critical enzyme in the synthesis of phosphatidylcholine, a major structural component of eukaryotic cell membranes, as reviewed in Estévez-Braun and co-authors [89]. The compounds tested in this study were further found to exhibit anti-proliferative activity against human colorectal adenocarcinoma HT29 cells in vitro and they also showed in vivo anti-tumoral activity in xenographs of HT29 cells injected into mice [89].

The anti-cancer effect of the quinone-methide pristimerin has been studied in a variety of cells in vitro and cancer models in vivo. Several molecular mechanisms underlying

the pristimerin effects were proposed; some of them have been confirmed through studies in more than one tumor type. Pristimerin was found to induce apoptosis in hormone-sensitive (LNCaP) and hormone-refractory (PC-3) prostate cancer cell lines [91]. Pristimerin increased annexin V-binding and cleavage of PARP-1, procaspases-3 and -9-induced mitochondrial depolarization, cytochrome c release from mitochondria, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and downregulation of BCL-2 and survivin expression via proteasome-dependent degradation [51, 91]. However, in the study, overexpression of BCL-2 rendered prostate cancer cells resistant to pristimerin. Pristimerin inhibits protein expression of CD133 and CD44, reduces VEGF expression and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin [IL]-1, -6, -8, TNF-α and interferon-γ in human prostate cancer PC-3 cells, also preventing the growth of xenografted PC-3 tumors into the bone of nude mice [91]. Pristimerin inhibited VEGF-induced vasculogenesis of bone marrow derived-endothelial progenitor cells by suppressing proliferation, adhesion and migration, possibly due to decreased phosphorylation of VEGF receptor-2, AKT and eNOS [91]. Pristimerin also inhibited the proliferation of (HER2)-positive SKBR3 human breast cancer cells, possibly due to changes in FASN and AKT expression. The changes in HER2, FASN and AKT expression induced by pristimerin altered the phosphorylation levels of various mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), including ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, and JNK, and lowered levels of phosphorylated mTOR and its downstream targets, such as p70S6K and 4E binding protein-1 (EIF4EBP1) [45]. Pristimerin inhibited migration and invasion of cells, and co-treatment with the mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin, additionally suppressed these cellular functions [45].

Pristimerin decreased cell proliferation of human pancreatic cancer cells (BxPC-3, PANC-1 and AsPC-1) in a dose- and time-dependent manner [43]. The work reported that treatment of pancreatic cancer cells with pristimerin resulted in G1-phase arrest associated with a marked decrease in the level of cyclins CCND1 and CCNE, and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK-2, -4 and -6) with concomitant induction of CDK inhibitors, CDKN1A (p21WAF1) and CDKN1B (p27KIP1). Pristimerin treatment also resulted in apoptotic cell death through cleavage of caspase-3, modulation in the expression of BCL-2 family proteins and inhibition of the translocation and DNA-binding activity of NF-κB [43].

In human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells (MiaPaCa-2 and Panc-1) pristimerin inhibited the proliferation and induced apoptosis [49]. These effects were characterized by increased Annexin V-binding and cleavage of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1 and activation of procaspases -3, -8 and -9 [49]. The induction of apoptosis was associated with the inhibition of the pro-survival AKT, NF-κB and mTOR proteins and downstream targets, such as FOXO3A, CCND1, COX-2, VEGF, p-70S6K1, p-4E-BP1, and protein kinase C-ε (PKCε), as well as of anti-apoptotic BCL-2 and survivin (also known as BIRC5) but not BCL-xL. Additionally, pristimerin induced mitochondrial depolarization and the release of cytochrome C from the mitochondria [49].

Pristimerin was found to possess potent cytotoxic effects, inducing apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation in U87 human glioma cells [86]. Pristimerin activated caspase-9, -3, and PARP cleavage. Pristimerin also increased the generation of ROS, and induced the subsequent release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria into the cytosol [86]. In ovarian cancer cells, pristimerin also induced apoptosis through cleavage of PARP-1, procaspases-3, -8 and -9 activity and enhanced mitochondrial depolarization [88]. The study also showed downregulated levels of p-AKT, p65 subunit of NF-κB and p-mTOR, and downregulated expression of NF-κB-regulated genes encoding anti-apoptotic proteins, such as BCL-2, BCLxL, c-IAP1 and survivin (BIRC5), therefore promoting apoptosis [88].

In a somewhat different approach, pristimerin was shown to inhibit human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression and activity in human pancreatic cancer cells [90]. The compound inhibited hTERT expression by suppressing the transcription factors Sp1, c-Myc and NF-κB, which are known to control hTERT gene expression, and inhibited protein kinase AKT, which phosphorylates and facilitates hTERT nuclear import and its telomerase activity [90].

Celastrol and triptolide extracted from the Chinese herb Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (also known as Lei Gong Teng or Thunder of God Vine) were also found to exhibit marked anti-tumoral effects [62]. Triptolide efficiently inhibited cell growth and induced cell death in human prostate cancer LNCaP and PC-3 cell lines in vitro as well as inhibited the xenografted PC-3 tumor growth in nude mice in vivo [62]. Tumor cell apoptosis was induced through the activation of caspases and PARP cleavage and reduced SUMO-specific protease 1 (SENP1, a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for prostate cancer) expression in dose- and time-dependent manner resulting in an enhanced cellular SUMOylation in prostate cancer cells [62]. Meanwhile, triptolide decreased c-Jun expression, and suppressed c-JUN transcription activity. On the one hand, silencing of SENP1 or c-JUN in PC-3 prostate cancer cells decreased cellular viability, suggesting that the cytotoxicity of triptolide could result from triptolide-induced downregulation of SENP1, or c-JUN. On the other hand, ectopic expression of SENP1, or c-JUN significantly increased the viability of prostate cancer cells upon triptolide exposure, indicating that rescuing these triptolide downregulated proteins could inhibit cell toxicity induced by triptolide [62].

Several other studies have addressed the effects of tripolide on cancer cells. For instance, exposure of BE(2)-C human neuroblastoma cells to triptolide resulted in reduction in cell growth and proliferation [92]. Along with cell cycle arrest in the S phase and inhibition of the colony-forming ability of BE (2)-C neuroblastoma cells observed in vitro, reduction of tumor development and growth of tumor grafts was seen in vivo [92]. Triptolide significantly decreased the proportion of regulatory T cells and lowered the levels of FOXP3 transcription factor (also known as scurfin) in the spleen and axillary lymph nodes of tumor-bearing mice [93]. Production of IL-10 and TGF-β in peripheral blood and spleen were also decreased and the production of VEGF in tumor-bearing mice was inhibited [93]. Triptolide attenuated colon cancer growth in vitro and in vivo [94]. Using a proteomic approach, the authors found 14-3-3ε, a cell cycle- and apoptosis-related protein, cleavage and perinuclear translocation, to be induced by triptolide in human colon cancer cells [94].

Triptolide was shown to enhance cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in human gastric cancer SC-M1 cells [40]. After low-dose combined treatments with triptolide and cisplatin, a decrease in viability with a concomitant increase in apoptosis was observed in SC-M1 cells but not in normal cells [40]. Apoptosis induced by the combined treatments was accompanied by a loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and release of cytochrome c and triptolide also increased the cisplatin-induced activation of caspase-3 and -9 and the downstream cleavage of PARP in SC-M1 cells in vitro [40]. The combined treatment completely suppressed in vivo tumor growth of gastric tumor grafts in mouse xenograft model [40]. In liver cancer, the combination of triptolide plus chemotherapeutics (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) reduced liver cancer cell viability and enhanced apoptosis compared with single treatment in vitro [95]. Furthermore, cells treated with triptolide plus chemotherapeutics exhibited marked production of intracellular ROS and caspase-3 activity, induced BAX expression, and inhibited BCL-2 expression [95].

Celastrol, a known natural 26S proteasome inhibitor, promotes cell apoptosis and inhibits tumor growth [27, 55, 62, 63]. Celastrol inhibited the proliferation of various human tumor cells, including multiple myeloma, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, melanoma, glioma, and breast cancer (with concentrations as low as 1 μM). Celastrol decreased protein levels of CCND1 and CCNE, but increased the CDKN1A and 1B protein levels, activated caspase-8, -9, and -3, as well as induced cleavage of BH3 interacting-domain death agonist (BID) and PARP. The apoptotic effects of celastrol were preceded by activation of JNK and repression of AKT signaling [55].

Celastrol was found targeting multiple molecular components, including activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2), mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I, heat shock protein 90, beta1 integrin, Kv11.1, the alpha subunit of a potassium ion channel, ERBB2, estrogen receptor α, as well as affecting the activities of p38 MAPK and AKT/mTOR pathways in various tumor cells [56-58, 60, 64].

Celastrol induces apoptosis in human cervical cancer cells by targeting a proteasome catalytic subunit β1, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) protein 29 (ERP29) and mitochondrial import receptor Tom22 (TOM22) [73]. Celastrol was found to induce ER stress and induced translocation of BAX into the mitochondria, further upregulating BIM and TOM22, possibly involving glycogen synthase kinase-3β in these events [73]. Celastrol could also induce paraptosis-like cytoplasmic vacuolization in cancer cell lines including HeLa cells, A549 cells and PC-3 cells derived from cervix, lung and prostate, respectively [41]. Celastrol directly affects the biochemical properties of tubulin heterodimer in vitro and reduces its protein level in vivo [74]. At the cellular level, celastrol induces synergistic apoptosis when combined with conventional microtubule-targeting drugs and manifests an efficacy toward taxol-resistant cancer cells. Celastrol inhibited the cell migration and increased G1 arrest, and induced autophagy and apoptosis in human gastric cancer cells [79].

Celastrol was also found to increase the level of autophagy in the human pancreatic cancer MiaPaCa-2 xenograft tumor model. However, autophagy inhibitor 3-MA could improve the therapeutic effect of celastrol in vitro and in vivo [96]. Celastrol could inhibit proliferation of human osteosarcoma cells accompanied by G2/M phase arrest, activation of caspase-3, -8, and-9, as well as triggering autophagic pathway, as evidenced by formation of autophagosome and accumulation of LC3B-II protein [97]. Intriguingly, inhibition of apoptosis enhanced autophagy while suppression of autophagy diminished apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells upon celastrol exposure. Celastrol also induced JNK activation and ROS generation, while the JNK inhibitor significantly attenuated celastrol-triggered apoptosis and autophagy while ROS scavenger could completely reverse them [97]. Celastrol induced autophagy in human androgen receptor (AR)-positive prostate cancer cells, while the AR knockdown resulted in enhanced autophagy induced by celastrol, and autophagy inhibition by miR-101 mimic was found to enhance the cytotoxic effect of celastrol in prostate cancer cells [98].

Celastrol decreased gastric cancer cells viability via reduced IκB phosphorylation, nuclear p65 subunit protein levels and NF-κB activity [81]. Furthermore, celastrol could increase miR-146a expression and upregulation of miR-146a expression could suppress NF-κB activity. However, downregulation of miR-146a expression can reverse the effect of celastrol on NF-κB activity and apoptosis in gastric cancer cells. Combination of TRAIL and celastrol induced apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells through upregulation and dephosphorylation of EIF4E-BP1 protein [82]. Celastrol was also found to exhibit anticancer activity in KU7 and 253JB-V bladder cells by inducing apoptosis, inhibition of growth, colony formation and migration in vitro and in vivo [84]. Celastrol was shown to decrease expression of specificity protein transcription factors Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 and several Sp-regulated genes/proteins including VEGF, survivin and CCND1 and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-3 [84].

Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) is a promising histone deacetylase inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration but its clinical application for solid tumors is partially limited by decreased susceptibility of cancer cells due to NF-κB activation [52]. As an NF-κB inhibitor, celastrol exhibits potent anti-cancer effects but has failed to enter clinical trials due to its toxicity [52]. The combination of celastrol and SAHA exerted substantial synergistic efficacy against human cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, accompanied by enhanced caspase-mediated apoptosis [52]. This combination inhibited the activation of NF-κB caused by SAHA monotherapy and consequently led to increased apoptosis in cancer cells [52]. Interestingly, E-cadherin was dramatically downregulated in celastrol-resistant cancer cells and E-cadherin expression was closely related to decreased sensitivity to celastrol. However, the combination treatment significantly augmented the expression of E-cadherin, suggesting that mutual mechanisms contributed to the synergistic anti-cancer activity [52]. Furthermore, the enhanced anti-cancer efficacy of celastrol combined with SAHA was validated in human lung cancer 95-D xenografts in mice in vivo without increased toxicity [52]. These synergistic anti-cancer effects of celastrol and SAHA could be underlined by their reciprocal sensitization, which was simultaneously regulated by NF-κB and E-cadherin [52].

The mechanistic effects of plant extracts have also been addressed to certain extent. A spray-dried extract of Maytenus ilicifolia was shown to induce apoptosis in human hepatocellular HepG2 cells and human colorectal carcinoma HT-29 cells via down-regulation of BCL-2 and activation caspase-3 [46]. Celastrus orbiculatus extract significantly inhibited cell viability and induced apoptosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma LM6 cells in a dose-dependent manner [96]. In this study, apoptosis was accompanied by an increased BAX expression and decreased BCL-2 expression, induced release of cytochrome C, activation of caspase-3, and cleavage of PARP [99]. Furthermore, activation of ERK, p38 MAPK, and JNK phosphorylation, and downregulation of AKT phosphorylation was observed [96]. Compound oleanen from Celastrus hypoleucus also exhibits antitumor activity toward human cervical cancer cells by increasing in activity of caspase -3, -7, and -6, as well as a proapoptotic protein BIM [39].

Emerging evidence shows that quinone-methide triterpenes exert multiple molecular mechanisms leading to decrease of tumor cell viability or even cell death, and therefore are indeed promising compounds in the context of cancer treatment. However, existing data also highlight the need for more comprehensive, far-reaching approaches and technologies that would lead to a better understanding of direct and indirect effects of these compounds on molecular processes in tumor cells in vitro and in vivo.

5. CELASTRACEAE AND POTENTIAL MOLECULAR TARGETS IN HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELLS CARCINOMA

HNSCC arises from premalignant progenitor cells that progress to invasive malignancy due to cumulative genetic alterations [100]. Conventional treatment modalities - surgery, radiation and chemotherapy - are nonselective therapies that not only cause damage to normal tissue but which are associated with systemic toxicities that reduce compliance and, consequently, the success of therapy [9, 10]. The past decade has witnessed significant improvements in the knowledge on the complex molecular abnormalities underlying the clinicopathological characteristics of HNSCC, a promising scenario for the development of novel diagnostic markers and therapeutic procedures for the clinical management of patients [8, 101]. In theory, once major molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of HNSCC are known, a cancer therapy working at the molecular level, targeting deregulated pathways may be created. In practice, a very limited number of therapeutic agents for the targeted treatment of HNSCC are currently undergoing clinical trials [102], and the only established therapeutic target is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). EGFR is a cell-surface protein that regulates cell growth and differentiation and it can be targeted by the monoclonal antibody cetuximab (™Erbitux), resulting in the elimination of signal transduction. EGFR is overexpressed in HNSCC when compared with cancer-free mucosa with predictive and prognostic value [10, 103-105]. However, despite the abundant expression in HNSCC, only a subset of patients responds to EGFR inhibitors since alternative downstream signaling pathways may remain activated [10, 11, 106-108]. These results indicate the need for combined therapy approaches and for the continuous search for new active compounds that may target molecular processes in HNSCC.

Upon comparing literature on genetic and molecular characteristics of HNSCC and data on the effects of Celastraceae-derived compounds on gene expression and protein levels, a lot of overlapping information can be found. We summarize the molecular alterations of HNSCC that have been addressed in studies on anti-cancer effects of Celastraceae-derived compounds and extracts (Table (Table33 ).

Table 3
Possible molecular targets of Celastraceae-derived compounds involved in HNSCC progression.

Loss of heterozygosity at the chromosomal region 9p21 is found in 70–80% of HNSCC cases, representing the most common genetic alteration in this type of cancer and in early pre-invasive lesions [109]. The CDKN2A gene locus found within this chromosome encodes transcript p16 involved in G1/S cell cycle regulation through the inhibition of cyclin dependent kinases such as CDK4 and CDK6 [110]. These kinases phosphorylate retinoblastoma protein (pRB) leading to the progression from G1 phase to S phase. For instance, pristimerin was previously shown to modulate the activity of CDK-4 and -6 resulting in G1-phase arrest of various human cancer cells [43, 51]. Emerging evidence shows that triterpenes affect the expression levels of other genes related to cell cycle progression, including including cyclin D1, cyclin E, p21, p27 and c-Myc, which have also been studied in the context of HNSCC [27, 32, 34, 36, 49, 111-113]. Therefore, a therapeutic interference able to regulate these CDKs, such as one seen upon treatment of tumor cells with pristimerin, could be important potential asset helping in cell proliferation control of HNSCC, as well.

Major molecular alterations in HNSCCs include the activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3-K/Akt) signal transduction pathway, shown to be activated in 50–80% of HNSCCs and involved in the regulation of various cellular processes, including apoptosis, proliferation and cell cycle progression [135, 136]. (Table (Table3 )3 ) lists numerous genes either directly or indirectly involved with this pathway, including AKT and ERK, but also Bcl-2, Bcl-x and NF-kB [112]. PI3-K itself is considered as a novel treatment target for HNSCC [137]. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a cell-growth regulator also associated with the PI3-K/Akt pathway and considered a therapeutic target for HNSCC [114]. Akt activated mTOR, which in turn phosphorylates p70-S6 kinase, leads to the activation of the ribosomal S6 protein. As a matter of fact, the accumulation of the phosphorylated active form of S6 is a common event in HNSCC tissue specimens [138]. Lee and co-authors have demonstrated that celastrol inhibits the activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling cascade at various levels in melanoma cells [139]. This important result could be addressed in the context of HNSCC since the PI3K-AKT pathway is downstream of EGFR, and phosphatidylinositol-4, 5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PIK3CA) is among the most frequently mutated oncogenes for this cancer type (approximately 20%), possibly playing a role for both HPV-negative and HPV-positive tumors [140, 141].

Compounds isolated from Celastraceae also target a hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR, also known as MET, encoded by the c-MET gene), the key player in PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling regulation. MET was found to be overexpressed in up to 84% of HNSCC cases and is being tackled as a therapeutic target for HNSCC [142]. Additionally, if the antioxidant systems that allow stem-like cancer cells to avoid oxidative stress and resist EGFR inhibition are targeted, this may sensitize the remaining surviving cells, which will become sensitive to treatment [143]. Thus, the effects of triterpenoids on the redox state of cells may also be explored in this context [144].

As an example of how Celastraceae compounds could affect HNSCC, the treatment of human tongue cancer cells with triptolide, ionizing radiation, or triptolide plus ionizing radiation was reported to oral cell colony numbers [145]. In the study, triptolide was shown to increase apoptosis and decrease the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins in oral cancer cells in vitro. In addition, in vivo a combination treatment (triptolide with radiation) synergistically reduced tumor weight and volume in vivo possibly via the induction of apoptosis and reduction in anti-apoptotic protein expression suggesting that this may be a promising combined modality therapy for advanced oral cancer [145].

Celastraceae triterpenoids (dihydrocelastrol and celastrol) were identified as potent inducers of unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling and cell death in a panel of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells [76]. The pharmacological exacerbation of the UPR was suggested to be an effective approach to eliminate OSCC cells [76]. The UPR is executed via distinct signaling cascades, whereby an initial attempt to restore folding homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum during stress is complemented by an apoptotic response if the defect cannot be resolved. Moreover, biochemical and genetic assays using OSCC cells demonstrated that intact protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK)-eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2)-activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4)-DNA damage-inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3, also known as C/EBP homologous protein, CHOP) signaling is required for pro-apoptotic function of UPR, and subsequent death of OSCC cells upon celastrol treatment [76].

Celastrol was found to decrease TGF-β1-induced phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7 (also known as TAK1) and RELA, and suppressed NF-κB reporter gene activity in HNSCC cells [141]. Celastrol also inhibited cell proliferation, while increasing sub-G0 DNA fragmentation and Annexin V markers of apoptosis. Furthermore, TGF-β and RELA activation promoted SMAD7 expression. In turn, SMAD7 preferentially suppressed TGF-β-induced SMAD and NF-κB reporters when compared with constitutive or TNF-β-induced NF-κB reporter gene activation. Thus, crosstalk by TGF-β via TAK1 and NF-κB promotes the malignant phenotype of HNSCC [133].

Altogether, current data on the anti-cancer effects of compounds isolated from Celastraceae (Table (Table3 )3 ) points to a prolific and promising field of research in which such molecules should be able to either inhibitor up-regulate key pathways involved in HNSCC phenotype. New studies in this area should contribute to bringing about additional molecules of interest to this still scarce treatment scenario.

CONCLUSION

At the clinical and molecular level, HNSCCs are characterized by extensive heterogeneity, a picture that defies their classification as a single disease. HNSCC treatment should undergo substantial changes in the near future due to the present-day exploration of its mutational landscape. However, the development of effective therapy modalities involves not only the increased understanding of the mechanisms involved in HNSCC carcinogenesis but also the identification of new molecules capable of acting upon several molecular mechanisms. Ideally compounds should distinguish themselves from conventional cytotoxic agents and from drugs that target a single step in signal transduction pathways. This review shows that a variety of compounds isolated from species from the Celastraceae family and, at times, plant extracts, have been addressed as multifunctional drugs, interfering in multiple steps in key pathways involved in the development and progression of HNSCC. Few studies have investigated the potential of Celastraceae molecules to target HNSCC features, a scenario that will hopefully change in the next few years.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to thank Dr. Sidney Augusto Vieira Filho, from Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, for the drawing depicting the chemical structures of triptolide, celastrol and pristimerin and Dr. Edward Ratovitski for critical reading of the manuscript. This work is supported by FAPESP (grant number: 2015/11600-4).

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Bcl-xl
B-Cell Lymphoma-eXtra Large
Bcl-2
B-Cell Lymphoma 2
XIAP
X-linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein
PARP
Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase
c-MET
Receptor tyrosine kinase acting as a proto-oncogene, also known as hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR)
CDK
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase
NF-κB
Nuclear Factor-κB
FASN
Fatty Acid SyNthase
HER-2
Human epidermal growth factor receptor
MAPK
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase
c-MYC
MYeloCytomatosis viral oncogene
VEGF
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
ERK
Extracellular Regulated MAP Kinase
JNK-c
Jun N-terminal Kinase
TGF-β
Transforming Growth Factor beta
mTOR
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin
4EB-P1
Translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1
HNSCC
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
CDKN
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase iNhibitor
RB
RetinoBlastoma protein
EGFR
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
PI3K
Phosphatidyl Inositol-3-Kinase
HPV
Human Papilloma Virus
SAHA
Suberoyl Anilide Hydroxamic Acid
PARP
Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase
CXCR4
C-X-C chemokine Receptor type 4 (CXCR-4) also known as fusin, or CD184 (cluster of differentiation 184)
hTERT
Human TElomerase Reverse Transcriptase
UPR
Unfolded Protein Response
OSCC
Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
HCPT
10-Hydroxycamptothecin, anti-cancer drug
ERα
Estrogene Receptor-α
HIF-1α
Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-α
TNF-α
Tumor Necrosis Factor-α
TRAIL
TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author(s) confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

1. W.H.O. World Health Organization http:// www.who.int/cancer/en. 2015. (accessed, June 10, 2014).
2. Medicine N.L. National Library of Medicine. http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed. 2014. (accessed, June 10, 2014).
3. Kamb A., Wee S., Lengauer C. Why is cancer drug discovery so difficult? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007;6:115–120. [PubMed]
4. Mangal M., Sagar P., Singh H., Raghava G.P., Agarwal S.M. NPACT: Naturally Occurring Plant-based Anti-cancer Compound-Activity-Target database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D1124–D1129. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Rogers S.J., Harrington K.J., Rhys-Evans P. O-Charoenrat, P.; Eccles, S.A. Biological significance of c-erbB family oncogenes in head and neck cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2005;24:47–69. [PubMed]
6. Majchrzak E., Szybiak B., Wegner A., Pienkowski P., Pazdrowski J., Luczewski L., Sowka M., Golusinski P., Malicki J., Golusinski W. Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in young adults: a review of the literature. Radiol. Oncol. 2014;48:1–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Jemal A., Siegel R., Xu J., Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2010;60:277–300. [PubMed]
8. Leemans C.R., Braakhuis B.J., Brakenhoff R.H. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11:9–22. [PubMed]
9. Pignon J.P., Maître A., Maillard E., Bourhis J.M. Group, Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother. Oncol. 2009;92:4–14. [PubMed]
10. Suh Y., Amelio I., Guerrero-Urbano T., Tavassoli M. Clinical update on cancer: molecular oncology of head and neck cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1018. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Vermorken J.B., Mesia R., Rivera F., Remenar E., Kawecki A., Rottey S., Erfan J., Zabolotnyy D., Kienzer H.R., Cupissol D., Peyrade F., Benasso M., Vynnychenko I., De Raucourt D., Bokemeyer C., Schueler A., Amellal N., Hitt R. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;359:1116–1127. [PubMed]
12. Machiels J.P., Schmitz S. New advances in targeted therapies for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Anticancer Drugs. 2011;22:626–633. [PubMed]
13. Kinghorn A.D., Pan L., Fletcher J.N., Chai H. The relevance of higher plants in lead compound discovery programs. J. Nat. Prod. 2011;74:1539–1555. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Brandão H.N., David J.P., Couto R.D., Nascimento J.A., David J.M. Chemistry and Pharmacology of Antineoplasic Chemoterapeutical Derivates from Plants. Quim. Nova. 2010;33:1359–1369.
15. Demain A.L., Vaishnav P. Natural products for cancer chemotherapy. Microb. Biotechnol. 2011;4:687–699. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Simmons M.P., Savolainen V., Clevinger C.C., Archer R.H., Davis J.I. Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from 26S nuclear ribosomal DNA, phytochrome B, rbcL, atpB, and morphology. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2001;19:353–366. [PubMed]
17. Spivey A.C., Weston M., Woodhead S. Celastraceae sesquiterpenoids: biological activity and synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002;31:43–59. [PubMed]
18. Zhou Z.L., Yang Y.X., Ding J., Li Y.C., Miao Z.H. Triptolide: structural modifications, structure-activity relationships, bioactivities, clinical development and mechanisms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012;29:457–475. [PubMed]
19. Liu Q. Triptolide and its expanding multiple pharmacological functions. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2011;11:377–383. [PubMed]
20. Wang P., Song Y., Zhang L., He H., Zhou X. Quinone methide derivatives: important intermediates to DNA alkylating and DNA cross-linking actions. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005;12:2893–2913. [PubMed]
21. Basaric N., Mlinaric-Majerski K., Kralj M. Quinone Methides: Photochemical Generation and its Application in Biomedicine. Curr. Org. Chem. 2014;18:3–18.
22. Bolton J.L. Quinone Methide Bioactivation Pathway: Contribution to Toxicity and/or Cytoprotection? Curr. Org. Chem. 2014;18:61–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Shanmugam M.K., Nguyen A.H., Kumar A.P., Tan B.K., Sethi G. Targeted inhibition of tumor proliferation, survival, and metastasis by pentacyclic triterpenoids: potential role in prevention and therapy of cancer. Cancer Lett. 2012;320:158–170. [PubMed]
24. Wang S., Wu X., Tan M., Gong J., Tan W., Bian B., Chen M., Wang Y. Fighting fire with fire: poisonous Chinese herbal medicine for cancer therapy. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012;140:33–45. [PubMed]
25. Paz T.A., dos Santos V.A., Inácio M.C., Pina E.S., Pereira A.M., Furlan M. Production of the quinone-methide triterpene maytenin by in vitro adventitious roots of Peritassa campestris (Cambess.) A.C.Sm. (Celastraceae) and rapid detection and identificationby APCI-IT-MS/MS. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013. 485837. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Jin U.H., Lee J.Y., Kang S.K., Kim J.K., Park W.H., Kim J.G., Moon S.K., Kim C.H. A phenolic compound, 5-caffeoylquinic acid (chlorogenic acid), is a new type and strong matrix metalloproteinase-9 inhibitor: isolation and identification from methanol extract of Euonymus alatus. Life Sci. 2005;77:2760–2769. [PubMed]
27. Yang H., Chen D., Cui Q.C., Yuan X., Dou Q.P. Celastrol, a triterpene extracted from the Chinese “Thunder of God Vine,” is a potent proteasome inhibitor and suppresses human prostate cancer growth in nude mice. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4758–4765. [PubMed]
28. Chen I.H., Du Y.C., Lu M.C., Lin A.S., Hsieh P.W., Wu C.C., Chen S.L., Yen H.F., Chang F.R., Wu Y.C. Lupane-type triterpenoids from Microtropis fokienensis and Perrottetia arisanensis and the apoptotic effect of 28-hydroxy-3-oxo-lup-20(29)-en-30-al. J. Nat. Prod. 2008;71:1352–1357. [PubMed]
29. Costa P.M., Ferreira P.M., Bolzani V.A., Furlan M., Dos Santos V.A., Corsino J., de Moraes M.O., Costa-Lotufo L.V., Montenegro R.C., Pessoa C. Antiproliferative activity of pristimerin isolated from Maytenus ilicifolia (Celastraceae) in human HL-60 cells. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2008;22:854–863. [PubMed]
30. Zhou G.X., Ding X.L., Huang J.F., Zhang H., Wu S.B., Cheng J.P., Wei Q. Apoptosis of human pancreatic cancer cells induced by Triptolide. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008;14:1504–1509. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Westfall S.D., Nilsson E.E., Skinner M.K. Role of triptolide as an adjunct chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Chemotherapy. 2008;54:67–76. [PubMed]
32. Yang H., Landis-Piwowar K.R., Lu D., Yuan P., Li L., Reddy G.P., Yuan X., Dou Q.P. Pristimerin induces apoptosis by targeting the proteasome in prostate cancer cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2008;103:234–244. [PubMed]
33. Liu J., Jiang Z., Xiao J., Zhang Y., Lin S., Duan W., Yao J., Liu C., Huang X., Wang T., Liang Z., Wang R., Zhang S., Zhang L. Effects of triptolide from Tripterygium wilfordii on ERalpha and p53 expression in two human breast cancer cell lines. Phytomedicine. 2009;16:1006–1013. [PubMed]
34. Wang Z., Jin H., Xu R., Mei Q., Fan D. Triptolide downregulates Rac1 and the JAK/STAT3 pathway and inhibits colitis-related colon cancer progression. Exp. Mol. Med. 2009;41:717–727. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Huang L., Zhang Z., Zhang S., Ren J., Zhang R., Zeng H., Li Q., Wu G. Inhibitory action of Celastrol on hypoxia-mediated angiogenesis and metastasis via the HIF-1α pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2011;27:407–415. [PubMed]
36. Johnson S.M., Wang X., Evers B.M. Triptolide inhibits proliferation and migration of colon cancer cells by inhibition of cell cycle regulators and cytokine receptors. J. Surg. Res. 2011;168:197–205. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Yang H.S., Kim J.Y., Lee J.H., Lee B.W., Park K.H., Shim K.H., Lee M.K., Seo K.I. Celastrol isolated from Tripterygium regelii induces apoptosis through both caspase-dependent and -independent pathways in human breast cancer cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011;49:527–532. [PubMed]
38. Yang S.W., Wang W., Xie X.Y., Zhu W.P., Li F.Q. In vitro synergistic cytotoxic effect of triptolide combined with hydroxycamptothecin on pancreatic cancer cells. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2011;39:121–134. [PubMed]
39. Gan N., Chen G., Zhang W., Zhou J. Oleanen induces apoptosis of cervical cancer cells by up-regulation of Bim. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2012;22:38–42. [PubMed]
40. Li C.J., Chu C.Y., Huang L.H., Wang M.H., Sheu L.F., Yeh J.I., Hsu H.Y. Synergistic anticancer activity of triptolide combined with cisplatin enhances apoptosis in gastric cancer in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2012;319:203–213. [PubMed]
41. Wang W.B., Feng L.X., Yue Q.X., Wu W.Y., Guan S.H., Jiang B.H., Yang M., Liu X., Guo D.A. Paraptosis accompanied by autophagy and apoptosis was induced by celastrol, a natural compound with influence on proteasome, ER stress and Hsp90. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012;227:2196–2206. [PubMed]
42. Qian Y.Y., Zhang H., Hou Y., Yuan L., Li G.Q., Guo S.Y., Hisamits T., Liu Y.Q. Celastrus orbiculatus extract inhibits tumor angiogenesis by targeting vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway and shows potent antitumor activity in hepatocarcinomas in vitro and in vivo. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2012;18:752–760. [PubMed]
43. Wang Y., Zhou Y., Zhou H., Jia G., Liu J., Han B., Cheng Z., Jiang H., Pan S., Sun B. Pristimerin causes G1 arrest, induces apoptosis, and enhances the chemosensitivity to gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43826. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Weng J.R., Yen M.H., Lin W.Y. Cytotoxic constituents from Celastrus paniculatus induce apoptosis and autophagy in breast cancer cells. Phytochemistry. 2013;94:211–219. [PubMed]
45. Lee J.S., Yoon I.S., Lee M.S., Cha E.Y., Thuong P.T., Diep T.T., Kim J.R. Anticancer activity of pristimerin in epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive SKBR3 human breast cancer cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2013;36:316–325. [PubMed]
46. Araújo Júnior R.F., Oliveira A.L., Pessoa J.B., Garcia V.B., Guerra G.C., Soares L.A., Souza T.P., Petrovick P.R., Araújo A.A. Maytenus ilicifolia dry extract protects normal cells, induces apoptosis and regulates Bcl-2 in human cancer cells. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 2013;238:1251–1258. [PubMed]
47. Lin Y., Yang X., Lu M., Zheng W., Zhang J., Zhuang H., Hua Z.C. Herbal compound triptolide synergistically enhanced antitumor activity of vasostatin120-180. Anticancer Drugs. 2013;24:945–957. [PubMed]
48. Liu Y.B., Gao X., Deeb D., Arbab A.S., Gautam S.C. Pristimerin Induces Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer Cells by Down-regulating Bcl-2 through ROS-dependent Ubiquitin-proteasomal Degradation Pathway. 2013. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Deeb D., Gao X., Liu Y.B., Pindolia K., Gautam S.C. Pristimerin, a quinonemethide triterpenoid, induces apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells through the inhibition of pro-survival Akt/NF-κB/mTOR signaling proteins and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2. Int. J. Oncol. 2014;44:1707–1715. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Jiang X. Huang, X.C.; Ao, L.; Liu, W.B.; Han, F.; Cao, J.; Zhang, D.Y.; Huang, C.S.; Liu, J.Y. Total alkaloids of Tripterygium hypoglaucum (levl.) Hutch inhibits tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014;151:292–298. [PubMed]
51. Liu Y.B., Gao X., Deeb D., Brigolin C., Zhang Y., Shaw J., Pindolia K., Gautam S.C. Ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation of antiapoptotic survivin facilitates induction of apoptosis in prostate cancer cells by pristimerin. Int. J. Oncol. 2014;45:1735–1741. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Zheng L., Fu Y., Zhuang L., Gai R., Ma J., Lou J., Zhu H., He Q., Yang B. Simultaneous NF-κB inhibition and E-cadherin upregulation mediate mutually synergistic anticancer activity of celastrol and SAHA in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Cancer. 2014;135:1721–1732. [PubMed]
53. Lo Iacono M., Monica V., Vavalà T., Gisabella M., Saviozzi S., Bracco E., Novello S., Papotti M., Scagliotti G.V. ATF2 contributes to cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer and celastrol induces cisplatin resensitization through inhibition of JNK/ATF2 pathway. Int. J. Cancer. 2015;136:2598–2609. [PubMed]
54. Fan X.X., Li N., Wu J.L., Zhou Y.L., He J.X., Liu L., Leung E.L. Celastrol induces apoptosis in gefitinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cells via caspases-dependent pathways and Hsp90 client protein degradation. Molecules. 2014;19:3508–3522. [PubMed]
55. Kannaiyan R., Manu K.A., Chen L., Li F., Rajendran P., Subramaniam A., Lam P., Kumar A.P., Sethi G. Celastrol inhibits tumor cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis through the activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase and suppression of PI3 K/Akt signaling pathways. Apoptosis. 2011;16:1028–1041. [PubMed]
56. Chen G., Zhang X., Zhao M., Wang Y., Cheng X., Wang D., Xu Y., Du Z., Yu X. Celastrol targets mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I to induce reactive oxygen species-dependent cytotoxicity in tumor cells. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:170. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Lee J.H., Choi K.J., Seo W.D., Jang S.Y., Kim M., Lee B.W., Kim J.Y., Kang S., Park K.H., Lee Y.S., Bae S. Enhancement of radiation sensitivity in lung cancer cells by celastrol is mediated by inhibition of Hsp90. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2011;27:441–446. [PubMed]
58. Zhu H., Liu X.W., Cai T.Y., Cao J., Tu C.X., Lu W., He Q.J., Yang B. Celastrol acts as a potent antimetastatic agent targeting beta1 integrin and inhibiting cell-extracellular matrix adhesion, in part via the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010;334:489–499. [PubMed]
59. Chang F.R., Hayashi K., Chen I.H., Liaw C.C., Bastow K.F., Nakanishi Y., Nozaki H., Cragg G.M., Wu Y.C., Lee K.H. Antitumor agents. 228. five new agarofurans, Reissantins A-E, and cytotoxic principles from Reissantia buchananii. J. Nat. Prod. 2003;66:1416–1420. [PubMed]
60. Ji N., Li J., Wei Z., Kong F., Jin H., Chen X., Li Y., Deng Y. 2015. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Wolfram J., Suri K., Huang Y., Molinaro R., Borsoi C., Scott B., Boom K., Paolino D., Fresta M., Wang J., Ferrari M., Celia C., Shen H. Evaluation of anticancer activity of celastrol liposomes in prostate cancer cells. J. Microencapsul. 2014;31:501–507. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Huang W., He T., Chai C., Yang Y., Zheng Y., Zhou P., Qiao X., Zhang B., Liu Z., Wang J., Shi C., Lei L., Gao K., Li H., Zhong S., Yao L., Huang M.E., Lei M. Triptolide inhibits the proliferation of prostate cancer cells and down-regulates SUMO-specific protease 1 expression. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37693. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Dai Y., Desano J., Tang W., Meng X., Meng Y., Burstein E., Lawrence T.S., Xu L. Natural proteasome inhibitor celastrol suppresses androgen-independent prostate cancer progression by modulating apoptotic proteins and NF-kappaB. PLoS One. 2010;5:e14153. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Pang X., Yi Z., Zhang J., Lu B., Sung B., Qu W., Aggarwal B.B., Liu M. Celastrol suppresses angiogenesis-mediated tumor growth through inhibition of AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Cancer Res. 2010;70:1951–1959. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Yang H., Shi G., Dou Q.P. The tumor proteasome is a primary target for the natural anticancer compound Withaferin A isolated from “Indian winter cherry”. Mol. Pharmacol. 2007;71:426–437. [PubMed]
66. Hieronymus H., Lamb J., Ross K.N., Peng X.P., Clement C., Rodina A., Nieto M., Du J., Stegmaier K., Raj S.M., Maloney K.N., Clardy J., Hahn W.C., Chiosis G., Golub T.R. Gene expression signature-based chemical genomic prediction identifies a novel class of HSP90 pathway modulators. Cancer Cell. 2006;10:321–330. [PubMed]
67. Raja S.M., Clubb R.J., Ortega-Cava C., Williams S.H., Bailey T.A., Duan L., Zhao X., Reddi A.L., Nyong A.M., Natarajan A., Band V., Band H. Anticancer activity of Celastrol in combination with ErbB2-targeted therapeutics for treatment of ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancers. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2011;11:263–276. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Jang S.Y., Jang S.W., Ko J. Celastrol inhibits the growth of estrogen positive human breast cancer cells through modulation of estrogen receptor α. Cancer Lett. 2011;300:57–65. [PubMed]
69. Zhang D., Xu L., Cao F., Wei T., Yang C., Uzan G., Peng B. Celastrol regulates multiple nuclear transcription factors belonging to HSP90's clients in a dose- and cell type-dependent way. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2010;15:939–946. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Mu X.M., Shi W., Sun L.X., Li H., Wang Y.R., Jiang Z.Z., Zhang L.Y. Pristimerin inhibits breast cancer cell migration by up- regulating regulator of G protein signaling 4 expression. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2012;13:1097–1104. [PubMed]
71. Wu C.C., Chan M.L., Chen W.Y., Tsai C.Y., Chang F.R., Wu Y.C. Pristimerin induces caspase-dependent apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells via direct effects on mitochondria. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2005;4:1277–1285. [PubMed]
72. Zhu H., Yang W., He L.J., Ding W.J., Zheng L., Liao S.D., Huang P., Lu W., He Q.J., Yang B. Upregulating Noxa by ER stress, celastrol exerts synergistic anti-cancer activity in combination with ABT-737 in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52333. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Feng L., Zhang D., Fan C., Ma C., Yang W., Meng Y., Wu W., Guan S., Jiang B., Yang M., Liu X., Guo D. ER stress-mediated apoptosis induced by celastrol in cancer cells and important role of glycogen synthase kinase-3β in the signal network. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e715. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Jo H., Loison F., Hattori H., Silberstein L.E., Yu H., Luo H.R. Natural product Celastrol destabilizes tubulin heterodimer and facilitates mitotic cell death triggered by microtubule-targeting anti-cancer drugs. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10318. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Byun J.Y., Kim M.J., Eum D.Y., Yoon C.H., Seo W.D., Park K.H., Hyun J.W., Lee Y.S., Lee J.S., Yoon M.Y., Lee S.J. Reactive oxygen species-dependent activation of Bax and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 is required for mitochondrial cell death induced by triterpenoid pristimerin in human cervical cancer cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2009;76:734–744. [PubMed]
76. Fribley A.M., Miller J.R., Brownell A.L., Garshott D.M., Zeng Q., Reist T.E., Narula N., Cai P., Xi Y., Callaghan M.U., Kodali V., Kaufman R.J. Celastrol induces unfolded protein response-dependent cell death in head and neck cancer. Exp. Cell Res. 2015;330:412–422. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
77. He D., Xu Q., Yan M., Zhang P., Zhou X., Zhang Z., Duan W., Zhong L., Ye D., Chen W. The NF-kappa B inhibitor, celastrol, could enhance the anti-cancer effect of gambogic acid on oral squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:343. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
78. Ma R., Bonnefond S., Morshed S.A., Latif R., Davies T.F. Stemness is Derived from Thyroid Cancer Cells. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2014;5:114. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
79. Lee H.W., Jang K.S., Choi H.J., Jo A., Cheong J.H., Chun K.H. Celastrol inhibits gastric cancer growth by induction of apoptosis and autophagy. BMB Rep. 2014;47:697–702. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
80. Sha M., Ye J., Zhang L.X., Luan Z.Y., Chen Y.B., Huang J.X. Celastrol induces apoptosis of gastric cancer cells by miR-21 inhibiting PI3K/Akt-NF-κB signaling pathway. Pharmacology. 2014;93:39–46. [PubMed]
81. Sha M., Ye J., Zhang L.X., Luan Z.Y., Chen Y.B. Celastrol induces apoptosis of gastric cancer cells by miR-146a inhibition of NF-κB activity. Cancer Cell Int. 2013;13:50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
82. Chakravarthy R., Clemens M.J., Pirianov G., Perdios N., Mudan S., Cartwright J.E., Elia A. Role of the eIF4E binding protein 4E-BP1 in regulation of the sensitivity of human pancreatic cancer cells to TRAIL and celastrol-induced apoptosis. Biol. Cell. 2013;105:414–429. [PubMed]
83. Zhang T., Hamza A., Cao X., Wang B., Yu S., Zhan C.G., Sun D. A novel Hsp90 inhibitor to disrupt Hsp90/Cdc37 complex against pancreatic cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008;7:162–170. [PubMed]
84. Deeb D., Gao X., Liu Y., Pindolia K., Gautam S.C. Inhibition of hTERT/telomerase contributes to the antitumor activity of pristimerin in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells. Oncol. Rep. 2015;34:518–524. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
85. Estévez-Braun A., Ravelo A.G., Pérez-Sacau E., Lacal J.C. A new family of choline kinase inhibitors with antiproliferative and antitumor activity derived from natural products. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2015;17:74–84. [PubMed]
86. Chadalapaka G., Jutooru I., Safe S. Celastrol decreases specificity proteins (Sp) and fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 (FGFR3) in bladder cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:886–894. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
87. Kim Y., Park H., Jeoung D. CAGE, a cancer/testis antigen, induces c-FLIP(L) and Snail to enhance cell motility and increase resistance to an anti-cancer drug. Biotechnol. Lett. 2009;31:945–952. [PubMed]
88. Yan Y.Y., Bai J.P., Xie Y., Yu J.Z., Ma C.G. The triterpenoid pristimerin induces U87 glioma cell apoptosis through reactive oxygen species-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction. Oncol. Lett. 2013;5:242–248. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
89. Kang H., Lee M., Jang S.W. Celastrol inhibits TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition by inhibiting Snail and regulating E-cadherin expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013;437:550–556. [PubMed]
90. Gao X., Liu Y., Deeb D., Arbab A.S., Gautam S.C. Anticancer activity of pristimerin in ovarian carcinoma cells is mediated through the inhibition of prosurvival Akt/NF-κB/mTOR signaling. J. Exp. Ther. Oncol. 2014;10:275–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
91. Huang S., He P., Peng X., Li J., Xu D., Tang Y. Pristimerin Inhibits Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis by Targeting PC-3 Stem Cell Characteristics and VEGF-Induced Vasculogenesis of BM-EPCs. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015;37:253–268. [PubMed]
92. Yan X., Ke X.X., Zhao H., Huang M., Hu R., Cui H. Triptolide inhibits cell proliferation and tumorigenicity of human neuroblastoma cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015;11:791–796. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
93. Liu B., Zhang H., Li J., Lu C., Chen G., Zhang G., Lu A., He X. Triptolide downregulates Treg cells and the level of IL-10, TGF-β, and VEGF in melanoma-bearing mice. Planta Med. 2013;79:1401–1407. [PubMed]
94. Liu Y., Song F., Wu W.K., He M., Zhao L., Sun X., Li H., Jiang Y., Yang Y., Peng K. Triptolide inhibits colon cancer cell proliferation and induces cleavage and translocation of 14-3-3 epsilon. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2012;30:271–278. [PubMed]
95. Li Y., Hu S. Triptolide sensitizes liver cancer cell lines to chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo. Panminerva Med. 2014;56:211–220. [PubMed]
96. Zhao X., Gao S., Ren H., Huang H., Ji W., Hao J. Inhibition of autophagy strengthens celastrol-induced apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer in vitro and in vivo models. Curr. Mol. Med. 2014;14:555–563. [PubMed]
97. Li H.Y., Zhang J., Sun L.L., Li B.H., Gao H.L., Xie T., Zhang N. 2015. Ye. Z.M. Celastrol induces apoptosis and autophagy via the ROS/JNK signaling pathway in human osteosarcoma cells: an in vitro and in vivo study. Cell Death Dis.,6, e1604.
98. Guo J., Huang X., Wang H. Yang. H. Celastrol Induces Autophagy by Targeting AR/miR-101 in Prostate Cancer Cells. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0140745. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
99. Zhang H., Qian Y., Liu Y., Li G., Cui P., Zhu Y., Ma H., Ji X., Guo S., Tadashi H. Celastrus orbiculatus extract induces mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2012;32:621–626. [PubMed]
100. Califano J., Westra W.H., Meininger G., Corio R., Koch W.M., Sidransky D. Genetic progression and clonal relationship of recurrent premalignant head and neck lesions. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000;6:347–352. [PubMed]
101. Stadler M.E., Patel M.R., Couch M.E., Hayes D.N. Molecular biology of head and neck cancer: risks and pathways. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 2008;22:1099–1124. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
102. Trial C. A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. 2015.
103. Loeffler-Ragg J., Witsch-Baumgartner M., Tzankov A., Hilbe W., Schwentner I., Sprinzl G.M., Utermann G., Zwierzina H. Low incidence of mutations in EGFR kinase domain in Caucasian patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer. 2006;42:109–111. [PubMed]
104. Temam S., Kawaguchi H., El-Naggar A.K., Jelinek J., Tang H., Liu D.D., Lang W., Issa J.P., Lee J.J., Mao L. Epidermal growth factor receptor copy number alterations correlate with poor clinical outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:2164–2170. [PubMed]
105. Ang K.K., Berkey B.A., Tu X., Zhang H.Z., Katz R., Hammond E.H., Fu K.K., Milas L. Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor expression on survival and pattern of relapse in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2002;62:7350–7356. [PubMed]
106. Bonner J.A., Harari P.M., Giralt J., Azarnia N., Shin D.M., Cohen R.B., Jones C.U., Sur R., Raben D., Jassem J., Ove R., Kies M.S., Baselga J., Youssoufian H., Amellal N., Rowinsky E.K., Ang K.K. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;354:567–578. [PubMed]
107. Thomas S.M., Bhola N.E., Zhang Q., Contrucci S.C., Wentzel A.L., Freilino M.L., Gooding W.E., Siegfried J.M., Chan D.C., Grandis J.R. Cross-talk between G protein-coupled receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways contributes to growth and invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2006;66:11831–11839. [PubMed]
108. Seethala R.R., Gooding W.E., Handler P.N., Collins B., Zhang Q., Siegfried J.M., Grandis J.R. Immunohistochemical analysis of phosphotyrosine signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and epidermal growth factor receptor autocrine signaling pathways in head and neck cancers and metastatic lymph nodes. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14:1303–1309. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
109. van der Riet P., Nawroz H., Hruban R.H., Corio R., Tokino K., Koch W., Sidransky D. Frequent loss of chromosome 9p21-22 early in head and neck cancer progression. Cancer Res. 1994;54:1156–1158. [PubMed]
110. Reed A.L., Califano J., Cairns P., Westra W.H., Jones R.M., Koch W., Ahrendt S., Eby Y., Sewell D., Nawroz H., Bartek J., Sidransky D. High frequency of p16 (CDKN2/MTS-1/INK4A) inactivation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1996;56:3630–3633. [PubMed]
111. Sikka A., Kaur M., Agarwal C., Deep G., Agarwal R. Metformin suppresses growth of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma via global inhibition of protein translation. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:1374–1382. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
112. Peng G., Cao R.B., Li Y.H., Zou Z.W., Huang J., Ding Q. Alterations of cell cycle control proteins SHP-1/2, p16, CDK4 and cyclin D1 in radioresistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014;10:1709–1716. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
113. Moreno-Galindo C., Hermsen M., García-Pedrero J.M., Fresno M.F., Suárez C., Rodrigo J.P. p27 and BCL2 expression predicts response to chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2014;50:128–134. [PubMed]
114. Mazibrada J., Longo L., Vatrano S., Cappia S., Giorcelli J., Pentenero M., Gandolfo S., Volante M., dell'Oste V., Lo Cigno I., Biolatti M., Landolfo S., Papotti M. Differential expression of HER2, STAT3, SOX2, IFI16 and cell cycle markers during HPV-related head and neck carcinogenesis. New Microbiol. 2014;37:129–143. [PubMed]
115. Zhen Y., Liu Z., Yang H., Yu X., Wu Q., Hua S., Long X., Jiang Q., Song Y., Cheng C., Wang H., Zhao M., Fu Q., Lyu X., Chen Y., Fan Y., Liu Y., Li X., Fang W. Tumor suppressor PDCD4 modulates miR-184-mediated direct suppression of C-MYC and BCL2 blocking cell growth and survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e872. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
116. Sarkar S., Maiti G.P., Jha J., Biswas J., Roy A., Roychoudhury S., Sharp T., Panda C.K. Reduction of proliferation and induction of apoptosis are associated with shrinkage of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma due to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2013;14:6419–6425. [PubMed]
117. Gao Y., Trivedi S., Ferris R.L., Koide K. Regulation of HPV16 E6 and MCL1 by SF3B1 inhibitor in head and neck cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:6098. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
118. Zhang W., Liu Y., Wang C.W. S100A4 promotes squamous cell laryngeal cancer Hep-2 cell invasion via NF-kB/MMP-9 signal. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2014;18:1361–1367. [PubMed]
119. Leelahavanichkul K., Amornphimoltham P., Molinolo A.A., Basile J.R., Koontongkaew S., Gutkind J.S. A role for p38 MAPK in head and neck cancer cell growth and tumor-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Mol. Oncol. 2014;8:105–118. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
120. Cassell A., Freilino M.L., Lee J., Barr S., Wang L., Panahandeh M.C., Thomas S.M., Grandis J.R. Targeting TORC1/2 enhances sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors in head and neck cancer preclinical models. Neoplasia. 2012;14:1005–1014. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
121. Gao W., Li J.Z., Chan J.Y., Ho W.K., Wong T.S. mTOR Pathway and mTOR Inhibitors in Head and Neck Cancer. ISRN Otolaryngol. 2012. 2012, 953089. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
122. Baschnagel A.M., Williams L., Hanna A., Chen P.Y., Krauss D.J., Pruetz B.L., Akervall J., Wilson G.D. c-Met expression is a marker of poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2014;88:701–707. [PubMed]
123. Sun Q., Zheng X., Zhang L., Yu J. Smac modulates chemosensitivity in head and neck cancer cells through the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011;17:2361–2372. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
124. Yazbeck V.Y., Li C., Grandis J.R., Zang Y., Johnson D.E. Single-agent obatoclax (GX15-070) potently induces apoptosis and pro-survival autophagy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Oral Oncol. 2014;50:120–127. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
125. da Silva S.D., Cunha I.W., Nishimoto I.N., Soares F.A., Carraro D.M., Kowalski L.P., Graner E. Clinicopathological significance of ubiquitin-specific protease 2a (USP2a), fatty acid synthase (FASN), and ErbB2 expression in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:e134–e139. [PubMed]
126. Albert S., Riveiro M.E., Halimi C., Hourseau M., Couvelard A., Serova M., Barry B., Raymond E., Faivre S. Focus on the role of the CXCL12/CXCR4 chemokine axis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2013;35:1819–1828. [PubMed]
127. Lagadec C., Vlashi E., Bhuta S., Lai C., Mischel P., Werner M., Henke M., Pajonk F. Tumor cells with low proteasome subunit expression predict overall survival in head and neck cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:152. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
128. Tamashiro P.M., Furuya H., Shimizu Y., Kawamori T. Sphingosine kinase 1 mediates head & neck squamous cell carcinoma invasion through sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1. Cancer Cell Int. 2014;14:76. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
129. Virós D., Camacho M., Zarraonandia I., García J., Quer M., Vila L., León X. Prognostic role of MMP-9 expression in head and neck carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Oral Oncol. 2013;49:322–325. [PubMed]
130. Skvortsov S., Dudás J., Eichberger P., Witsch-Baumgartner M., Loeffler-Ragg J., Pritz C., Schartinger V.H., Maier H., Hall J., Debbage P., Riechelmann H., Lukas P., Skvortsova I., Group E.P. Rac1 as a potential therapeutic target for chemo-radioresistant head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Br. J. Cancer. 2014;110:2677–2687. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
131. Aderhold C., Umbreit C., Faber A., Sauter A., Sommer J.U., Birk R., Erben P., Hofheinz R.D., Stern-Straeter J., Hörmann K., Schultz J.D. Chemotherapeutic alteration of VEGF, PDGF and PDGFRα/β expression under 5-FU vs. docetaxel in HPV-transformed squamous cell carcinoma compared to HPV-negative HNSCC in vitro. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:1951–1961. [PubMed]
132. Egloff A.M., Rothstein M.E., Seethala R., Siegfried J.M., Grandis J.R., Stabile L.P. Cross-talk between estrogen receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15:6529–6540. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
133. Freudlsperger C., Bian Y., Contag Wise S., Burnett J., Coupar J., Yang X., Chen Z., Van Waes C. TGF-β and NF-κB signal pathway cross-talk is mediated through TAK1 and SMAD7 in a subset of head and neck cancers. Oncogene. 2013;32:1549–1559. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
134. Pickhard A., Gröber S., Haug A.K., Piontek G., Wirth M., Straßen U., Rudelius M., Reiter R. Survivin and pAkt as potential prognostic markers in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2014;117:733–742. [PubMed]
135. Lothaire P., de Azambuja E., Dequanter D., Lalami Y., Sotiriou C., Andry G., Castro G., Awada A. Molecular markers of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: promising signs in need of prospective evaluation. Head Neck. 2006;28:256–269. [PubMed]
136. Brazil D.P., Yang Z.Z., Hemmings B.A. Advances in protein kinase B signalling: AKTion on multiple fronts. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2004;29:233–242. [PubMed]
137. Psyrri A., Seiwert T.Y., Jimeno A. Molecular pathways in head and neck cancer: EGFR, PI3K, and more. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book. 2013:246–255. [PubMed]
138. Amornphimoltham P., Patel V., Sodhi A., Nikitakis N.G., Sauk J.J., Sausville E.A., Molinolo A.A., Gutkind J.S. Mammalian target of rapamycin, a molecular target in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9953–9961. [PubMed]
139. Lee J.H., Won Y.S., Park K.H., Lee M.K., Tachibana H., Yamada K., Seo K.I. Celastrol inhibits growth and induces apoptotic cell death in melanoma cells via the activation ROS-dependent mitochondrial pathway and the suppression of PI3K/AKT signaling. Apoptosis. 2012;17:1275–1286. [PubMed]
140. Agrawal N., Frederick M.J., Pickering C.R., Bettegowda C., Chang K., Li R.J., Fakhry C., Xie T.X., Zhang J., Wang J., Zhang N., El-Naggar A.K., Jasser S.A., Weinstein J.N., Treviño L., Drummond J.A., Muzny D.M., Wu Y., Wood L.D., Hruban R.H., Westra W.H., Koch W.M., Califano J.A., Gibbs R.A., Sidransky D., Vogelstein B., Velculescu V.E., Papadopoulos N., Wheeler D.A., Kinzler K.W., Myers J.N. Exome sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals inactivating mutations in NOTCH1. Science. 2011;333:1154–1157. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
141. Stransky N., Egloff A.M., Tward A.D., Kostic A.D., Cibulskis K., Sivachenko A., Kryukov G.V., Lawrence M.S., Sougnez C., McKenna A., Shefler E., Ramos A.H., Stojanov P., Carter S.L., Voet D., Cortés M.L., Auclair D., Berger M.F., Saksena G., Guiducci C., Onofrio R.C., Parkin M., Romkes M., Weissfeld J.L., Seethala R.R., Wang L., Rangel-Escareño C., Fernandez-Lopez J.C., Hidalgo-Miranda A., Melendez-Zajgla J., Winckler W., Ardlie K., Gabriel S.B., Meyerson M., Lander E.S., Getz G., Golub T.R., Garraway L.A., Grandis J.R. The mutational landscape of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Science. 2011;333:1157–1160. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
142. Seiwert T.Y., Jagadeeswaran R., Faoro L., Janamanchi V., Nallasura V., El Dinali M., Yala S., Kanteti R., Cohen E.E., Lingen M.W., Martin L., Krishnaswamy S., Klein-Szanto A., Christensen J.G., Vokes E.E., Salgia R. The MET receptor tyrosine kinase is a potential novel therapeutic target for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3021–3031. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
143. Yoshikawa M., Tsuchihashi K., Ishimoto T., Yae T., Motohara T., Sugihara E., Onishi N., Masuko T., Yoshizawa K., Kawashiri S., Mukai M., Asoda S., Kawana H., Nakagawa T., Saya H., Nagano O. xCT inhibition depletes CD44v-expressing tumor cells that are resistant to EGFR-targeted therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2013;73:1855–1866. [PubMed]
144. Liby K.T., Yore M.M., Sporn M.B. Triterpenoids and rexinoids as multifunctional agents for the prevention and treatment of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2007;7:357–369. [PubMed]
145. Chen Y.W., Lin G.J., Hueng D.Y., Huang S.H., Chia W.T., Shieh Y.S., Ma K.H., Sytwu H.K. Enhanced anti-tumor activity of triptolide in combination with irradiation for the treatment of oral cancer. Planta Med. 2014;80:255–261. [PubMed]

Articles from Current Genomics are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers