PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of plosntdPLoS Neglected Tropical DiseasesView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 February; 11(2): e0005382.
Published online 2017 February 9. doi:  10.1371/journal.pntd.0005382
PMCID: PMC5321442

Killing of diverse eye pathogens (Acanthamoeba spp., Fusarium solani, and Chlamydia trachomatis) with alcohols

Christian Johnson, Editor

Abstract

Background

Blindness is caused by eye pathogens that include a free-living protist (Acanthamoeba castellanii, A. byersi, and/or other Acanthamoeba spp.), a fungus (Fusarium solani), and a bacterium (Chlamydia trachomatis). Hand-eye contact is likely a contributor to the spread of these pathogens, and so hand washing with soap and water or alcohol–based hand sanitizers (when water is not available) might reduce their transmission. Recently we showed that ethanol and isopropanol in concentrations present in hand sanitizers kill walled cysts of Giardia and Entamoeba, causes of diarrhea and dysentery, respectively. The goal here was to determine whether these alcohols might kill infectious forms of representative eye pathogens (trophozoites and cysts of Acanthamoeba, conidia of F. solani, or elementary bodies of C. trachomatis).

Methodology/Principal findings

We found that treatment with 63% ethanol or 63% isopropanol kills >99% of Acanthamoeba trophozoites after 30 sec exposure, as shown by labeling with propidium iodide (PI) and failure to grow in culture. In contrast, Acanthamoeba cysts, which contain cellulose fibers in their wall, are relatively more resistant to these alcohols, particularly isopropanol. Depending upon the strain tested, 80 to 99% of Acanthamoeba cysts were killed by 63% ethanol after 2 min and 95 to 99% were killed by 80% ethanol after 30 sec, as shown by PI labeling and reduced rates of excystation in vitro. Both ethanol and isopropanol (63% for 30 sec) kill >99% of F. solani conidia, which have a wall of chitin and glucan fibrils, as demonstrated by PI labeling and colony counts on nutrient agar plates. Both ethanol and isopropanol (63% for 60 sec) inactivate 96 to 99% of elementary bodies of C. trachomatis, which have a wall of lipopolysaccharide but lack peptidoglycan, as measured by quantitative cultures to calculate inclusion forming units.

Conclusions/Significance

In summary, alcohols kill infectious forms of Acanthamoeba, F. solani, and C. trachomatis, although longer times and higher ethanol concentrations are necessary for Acanthamoeba cysts. These results suggest the possibility that expanded use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers in places where water is not easily available might reduce transmission of these important causes of blindness.

Author summary

Hand washing with soap and water is an important public health tool for reducing transmission of viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protists. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers, which are widely dispensed in hospitals and public places, kill many of these same pathogens. What is not known is how effectively the alcohol-based hand sanitizers kill protists, fungi, or bacteria that cause eye disease. Here we show ethanol and isopropanol penetrate the walls and kill a free-living protist (Acanthamoeba castellanii, A. byersi, and other Acanthamoeba spp.), and a fungus (Fusarium solani), each of which causes keratitis, as well as a bacterium (Chlamydia trachomatis) that causes trachoma. These results suggest the possible benefit of hand sanitizers in the prevention of these eye pathogens.

Introduction

Acanthamoeba castellanii, A. byersi, and other Acanthamoeba spp. are free-living protists named for actin-mediated spikes (acanthopods) on their surface that resemble those of acanthocytes (deformed red cells associated with various disease states) [1]. Acanthamoeba infections, which are often associated with use of contact lenses, may cause of corneal inflammation (keratitis) and blindness [24]. Acanthamoebae may also cause granulomatous encephalitis, particularly in immunosuppressed patients [5]. Acanthamoebae may host Legionella pneumophilia, Vibrio cholera, Campylobacter jejuni, and Listeria monocytogenes and so likely contribute to pneumonia, diarrhea, or disseminated disease caused by these pathogenic bacteria [69]. Acanthamoebae may contain enormous double-stranded DNA viruses (mimiviridae and Marseilleviridae), which may cause respiratory infections [10, 11]. In addition to mimivirus genomes, which contain nearly one thousand genes, the Acanthamoeba nucleus contains ~500 genes that were laterally transferred from bacteria (by far the most of any eukaryote described to date) [12].

The motile, reproductive, and vegetative form of Acanthamoeba, which has the acanthopods and phagocytoses bacteria, is called a trophozoite. When deprived of nutrients, trophozoites form cysts, which are immotile and have cellulose fibers in the wall [13]. During the course of keratitis infection, Acanthamoeba breaks down the epithelial barrier, induces an intense inflammatory response, and produces tears, photophobia, and pain due to radial neuritis [14]. Mouse and rabbit models of Acanthamoeba keratitis have identified protist virulence factors (e.g. mannose-binding lectin and secreted proteases) and host factors that mediate resistance to the protist (e.g. IL-17A) [1517]. Acanthamoeba infections are treated with drug combinations (e.g. polyhexamethylene biguanide, chlorhexidine digluconate, propamidine isethionate, and hexamidine) [18]. These drugs are much more effective against trophozoites than cysts [19]. To date, efforts to prevent Acanthamoeba transmission have focused on the development of cleaning methods for contact lenses that kill trophozoites and cysts [20, 21]. Hand contamination with Acanthamoeba is likely also a significant contributor to its transmission.

Fungi that cause keratitis include Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Fusarium solani, the focus of studies here [22, 23]. Fusarium is a large genus of filamentous fungi that form septate hyaline hyphae about 3 to 8 microns in diameter. They also form fusoid macroconidia (multicellular, banana-like clusters), microconidia (unicellular, ovoid to cylindrical forms) and chlamydospores (dark, smooth-surfaced spheres). On culture plates Fusarium is identified on the basis of colony appearance, pigmentation, and growth rate [24]. Fusarium causes wilt in potatoes and root rot in tomatoes (F. solani), head blight in barley and wheat (F. graminaerum), ear rot in maize (F. verticilloides), and banana wilt (F. oxysporum) [25]. F. sporotrichioides produces a trichothecene mycotoxin, which may be an agent of biological warfare [26]. Fungal keratitis, which is an important cause of blindness in Asia, is associated with trauma by vegetable matter, as well as contact lens use (Aspergillus and Fusarium) or systemic disease (Candida) [27, 28]. Fusarium was also responsible for an outbreak of keratitis in the US associated with wearing soft hydrophilic contact lenses [29]. The infectious forms of F. solani are likely the conidia, which are asexually produced spores.

Fungal keratitis causes foreign body sensation and intense eye pain associated with excessive vascularization, epithelial defect, stromal infiltration, conjunctival hyperemia, hypopyon, and possible corneal perforation. Advanced keratitis can lead to endopthalmitis in immunocompromised, as well as immunocompetent individuals [30]. Since clinical presentation of fungal keratitis is inconclusive, cultures of corneal scraping, tissue biopsies, and PCR are frequently used for the definitive diagnosis of the infection [31]. Treatment is accomplished using different anti-mycotic agents including natamycin, amphotericin B, voriconazole, and ketoconazole [3234]. Surgical approaches include keratoplasty and eye enucleation, in the case of treatment failure [35].

Because of the tremendous economic impact of Fusarium species on agriculture, much more is known about plant pathogenesis than human pathogenesis [36]. However, fluorescent labeled fungi have been used to study F. solani keratitis in mice [37], and spectral domain optical coherence tomography has been used to determine the order of events in a rat model of contact-lens associated keratitis [38].

Trachoma, which results from recurrent infections of the eye with the ocular serovars of the obligate intracellular bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis, is the leading infectious cause of blindness [39]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), trachoma is responsible for the visual impairment of about 2.2 million people, of whom 1.2 million are irreversibly blind [40]. Trachoma has a significant social and economic impact in poor, rural areas of Africa, Asia, and the Middle East, which are least equipped to manage such infections. The replicating form C. trachomatis is the reticulate body (RB), which develops within in an intracytoplasmic vacuole of the host cell known as an inclusion. The RBs, however, are not infectious. Only the elementary body (EB) form, which is small and metabolically inactive, is capable of initiating infection.

Trachoma begins in childhood where repeated episodes of conjunctival infection with the ocular serovars of C. trachomatis leads to inflammation and scarring that, over time, results in trichiasis, where the eye lid contracts and the eyelashes turn inward where they cause trauma to the corneal surface. Eventually this leads to corneal opacification and blindness [39].

In order to eliminate blindness due to trachoma by 2020, the WHO endorsed the SAFE strategy through surgery, antibiotics, facial cleanliness, and environmental improvement [4143]. Surgical procedures for treatment of trichiasis have recently been summarized [44]. Mass treatment of an entire community with azithromycin has been successful in decreasing the prevalence of trachoma, but it is expensive, treatment must be repeated, and it can lead to antibiotic resistance of co-circulating pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae within a community [45]. Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) are important components of facial cleanliness and hygiene in trachoma elimination strategies [46, 47]. Reduction in Acanthamoeba and Fusarium infections has also focused on hand washing with soap and water, as well as the best methods for cleaning contact lenses. A major limitation of these strategies is water scarcity, which faces four billion persons, primarily in Africa and Asia [48, 49].

The question addressed here is what might be done to prevent infections with Acanthamoeba, F. solani, and C. trachomatis in places where water for hand washing with soap is unavailable? In particular, might alcohol-based hand sanitizers, which are widely used to prevent spread of bacterial and fungal infections in hospitals in developing and developed countries, kill these important eye pathogens [5059]? As a model for these studies, we recently showed that ethanol and isopropanol in concentrations present in hand sanitizers kill cysts of Giardia and Entamoeba, important causes of diarrhea and dysentery, respectively [60]. In each case, the alcohols penetrate the cyst walls and permeabilize the plasma membrane, so that nuclei stain with propidium iodide (PI), and trophozoites fail to excyst in culture or in animals (Giardia). Here we show that ethanol and isopropanol can kill trophozoites and cysts of Acanthamoeba, conidia of F. solani, or elementary bodies of C. trachomatis.

Methods

Ethics statement

Culture and manipulation of Acanthamoeba, F. solani, and Chlamydia spp. have been approved by the Boston University Institutional Biosafety Committee.

Acanthamoeba methods

Trophozoites of A. castellanii MEEI 0184strain and Acanthamoeba spp. Esbc4 (PHLS) and Shi (PHLS) strains, each of which was derived from a human corneal infection, were generous gifts of Dr. Noorjahan Panjwani of Tufts University School of Medicine. Trophozoites were grown in PYG medium, which contains 0.75% proteose peptone, 0.75% yeast extract, and 1.5% glucose at 30°C (Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, St. Louis, MO) [61]. Acanthamoeba byersi was obtained from American type culture collection (ATCC PRA-411) and was grown in PYG medium containing 2% proteose peptone, 0.1% yeast extract and 1.8% glucose along with additives. Log-phase trophozoites, which were free of cysts that form spontaneously in stationary cultures, were concentrated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm and washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), which contained 10 mM PO43-, 137 mM NaCl, and 2.7 mM KCl, pH7.4. Trophozoites (106/ml in duplicate tubes) were suspended in water, 63% ethanol, or 63% isopropanol for 30, 60, or 120 sec at room temperature. After treatment, the trophozoite suspension was diluted x 10 with 1X PBS, pelleted at 3000 rpm for 10 min, washed x 2 in PBS, and cultured for three days in PYG medium. Trophozoites were counted using phase microscopy and a haemocytometer. Differential interference microscopy (DIC) was used to discriminate live organisms (motile with acanthopod spikes) from dead organisms (immotile and rounded). Alternatively, untreated and alcohol-treated trophozoites were incubated with Syto 9 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cambridge, MA), a vital stain that penetrates the plasma membrane, and PI, a nuclear stain that does not penetrate the plasma membrane [60, 62, 63]. Using a Zeiss inverted fluorescence microscope, we determined how many trophozoites were live (label green with Syto 9 but not red with PI) or dead (label with both Syto 9 and PI).

Acanthamoeba trophozoites were induced to encyst by incubation at 30°C for ten days on non-nutrient agar plates. Intact cysts (106/ml), which were obtained by scraping plates, were incubated in water, 63% ethanol, 80% ethanol, 63% isopropanol, or 80% isopropanol for 30, 60, or 120 sec at room temperature, diluted x 10 with PBS, pelleted at 3000 rpm for 10 min, and washed x 2 in PBS to remove alcohols. To simulate evaporation of alcohols on hands, we dried some cysts with a rotary vacuum after removal of alcohols. Cysts +/- drying were placed in PYG medium for 24 hours at 30°C to measure excystation of trophozoites. Alternatively, untreated and alcohol-treated amoebae were labeled with PI and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) (Sigma-Aldrich), which binds to glycoproteins in the cyst wall. Fluorescence microscopy was used to discriminate live cysts (label with WGA but not PI) from dead cysts (label with both WGA and PI).

Fusarium methods

F. solani (ATCC 36031) was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Virginia) and grown on a potato dextrose agar plate (BD 213400) (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) for 48 hr at 30°C. Conidia were removed from the agar plate with a cell scraper, filtered through a gauze pad, and washed with PBS x 2 by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min. F. solani conidia (1x106/ml) were resuspended in water, 63% ethanol, or 63% isopropanol for 30, 60, or 120 sec at room temperature, diluted X 10 with PBS, and then pelleted at 3000 rpm for 10 min, and resuspended in water for plating. Conidia were serially diluted, and ~10 or ~100 conidia were plated on potato dextrose agar plate from control tubes, whereas one million conidia were inoculated from ethanol-treated and isopropanol-treated tubes. Alternatively, conidia were labeled with PI and WGA, which binds to chitin in fungal walls, and observed with a Zeiss fluorescence microscope to determine live (labels with WGA but not PI) and dead (labels with both WGA and PI).

Chlamydia methods

The ocular serovar C. trachomatis strain A2497, originally isolated from a 2.5 year old with intense active trachoma in Tanzania, has been sequenced and used in non-human primate studies of trachoma pathogenesis and vaccination [64, 65]. Gradient purified EBs were prepared and titered as previously described [66]. For each experimental condition, C. trachomatis EBs suspended in sucrose-phosphate-glutamic acid (SPG) buffer were added to ethanol or isopropanol to achieve a final alcohol concentration of 63% and allowed to incubate at room temperature for 30 or 60 sec. Mock treated EBs were diluted in SPG alone for the same time period. The alcohol was not allowed to evaporate on the EBs. At the end of the incubation period, the alcohol was diluted with chilled RPMI-1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific)) containing 10% low endotoxin fetal bovine serum (FBS) (HyClone Laboratories, Logan UT), gentamicin (20 μg/ml) and cycloheximide (2 μg/ml), and EBs were inoculated in triplicate to a monolayer of L929 fibroblasts (ATCC) plated in the same medium in 96-well or 24-well tissue culture dishes at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1:10. The final alcohol concentration on the monolayer was less than 0.5%; control wells were inoculated with the same final dilution of alcohol to assess for cytotoxicity to the monolayer. After 44 hr incubation at 37%/5% CO2, cells were fixed in methanol and EBs were stained using a Chlamydia-specific LPS monoclonal antibody (gift of Dr. You-Xun Zhang of Boston Medical Center), followed by FITC-conjugated secondary antibody. Cells were counter stained with Evans blue (Sigma-Aldrich). Antibodies were used at a concentration of 10 μg/ml and incubated for 20 min with washing in between each step. The inclusions were counted under fluorescent microscopy, and the number of infectious units recovered per well was determined. Percent killing was calculated based on the inclusions recovered from mock treated EBs.

Results

Ethanol and isopropanol kill trophozoites of Acanthamoeba in 30 seconds

The motile, dividing form of Acanthamoeba, is the trophozoite, while the immotile, non-dividing and walled form is the cyst. Because both trophozoites and cysts are capable of causing eye infections, we tested ethanol and isopropanol against both forms. We found that trophozoites of A. castellanii MEI 0184 strain, Acanthamoeba spp. Shi and Esbc4 strains, and an A. byersi isolate are each rapidly killed (within 30 sec) by exposure to 63% ethanol or 63% isopropanol, as shown by loss of motility and acanthopods (DIC microscopy), as well as permeability of plasma membranes to PI (red in fluorescence microscopy) (Fig 1A to 1F). Syto 9 (green in fluorescence microscopy) is a vital stain that penetrates through intact plasma membranes [47]. While untreated trophozoites rapidly multiply in culture for three days, there is no growth of alcohol-treated Acanthamoebae, and all those recovered are dead (as shown by DIC and/or fluorescence microscopy) (Fig 2).

Fig 1
A. castellanii trophozoites and cysts are rapidly permeabilized and killed by ethanol and isopropanol.
Fig 2
Treatment with alcohols blocks all growth of A. castellanii trophozoites in culture.

Longer times or higher concentrations of ethanol are needed to kill Acanthamoeba cysts

Cysts of Acanthamoeba are also killed by exposure to ethanol and isopropanol, as shown by permeability of walls and plasma membrane to PI and by reduced excystation when placed in culture medium (Figs 1G to 1I and 3A to 3D). Here there was considerable variability among the four Acanthamoeba strains examined. In each case, though, it took longer to kill cysts in 63% ethanol (up to 120 sec), although all four sets of cysts were killed in 30 sec in 80% ethanol (the upper limit for alcohol in hand sanitizers). Isopropanol was much less effective than ethanol in killing Acanthamoeba cysts. Further, drying of cysts in a rotary evaporator had no effect on excystation.

Fig 3
Treatment of Acanthamoeba cysts with alcohols reduces excystation and trophozoite growth.

Both alcohols kill conidia of F. solani in 30 seconds

F. solani conidia, which were grown on potato dextrose agar plates, are killed within 30 sec by 63% ethanol or 63% isopropanol, as shown by permeability of walls and plasma membrane to PI and by colony counting on culture plates (Figs 4A to 4C and 5A to 5D). For the latter, conidia were treated with alcohols, diluted, pelleted, washed, and then plated at various dilutions. We counted nearly the same colonies from 10 untreated F. solani conidia as from 106 ethanol-treated or isopropanol-treated conidia. These results suggest that >99% of the F. solani conidia are killed by each alcohol.

Fig 4
F. solani conidia are rapidly permeabilized and killed by ethanol and isopropanol.
Fig 5
Treatment of F. solani conidia with ethanol and isopropanol markedly inhibits colony formation on nutrient agar plates.

Alcohols inactivate EB of C. trachomatis in 60 seconds

Because C. trachomatis is an obligate intracellular bacterium, we modified our approach so that purified chlamydial EBs, the infectious forms of the organism, were incubated with 63% ethanol or 63% isopropanol for 30 or 60 sec. We then diluted the alcohol exposed EBs and inoculated them onto L929 fibroblasts to determine if they were capable of developing intracellular inclusions, since at a low MOI each inclusion can be assumed to grow from one EB. Treatment of EBs with ethanol (Fig 6B) or isopropanol (Fig 6C) for 30 sec prior to plating markedly reduced the number of recovered inclusions compared to mock treated EBs (Fig 6A). However, after a 60 sec exposure to alcohol, extremely rare or no inclusions were visible in either the ethanol- or isopropanol-treated wells. These data are quantified in Fig 6D, demonstrating approximately 50% killing of the EBs after 30 sec and 96–99% killing after 60 sec exposure. In summary, killing of EB of C. trachomatis by 63% ethanol takes longer (60 sec) than killing conidia of F. solani (30 sec) but takes shorter time than killing Acanthamoeba cysts (120 sec).

Fig 6
Elementary bodies of C. trachomatis are killed by ethanol and isopropanol.

Discussion

Pros of alcohol-based hand sanitizers to reduce infections with diverse eye pathogens

Treatment with ethanol or isopropanol in the concentrations present in hand sanitizers kills Acanthamoeba trophozoites, F. solarium conidia, and C. trachomatis elementary bodies (Figs (Figs3,3, ,55 and and6).6). In contrast, longer times or higher ethanol concentrations are necessary to kill cysts of Acanthamoeba, and isopropanol is much less effective at killing cysts. Labeling with PI shows that the walls and membranes of Acanthamoeba and F. solani are penetrated by the alcohols (Figs (Figs11 and and4),4), as has been shown from cysts of Giardia and Entamoeba [60]. Although the small size makes it difficult to study the cell wall architecture, it is likely that the bacterial membranes of the chlamydial EBs are also penetrated by alcohols. Drying, which occurs when alcohols evaporate from the hands, was not necessary for alcohol-based killing of these organisms. These results extend previous findings showing that treatment of Acanthamoeba cysts with alcohols and other organic solvents for 10 min reduces excystation, while numerous additives to contact lens solutions prevents the growth of contaminating Acanthamoeba trophozoites [6770].

Alcohol-based hand sanitizers are safe, relatively inexpensive, stable at room temperature, and do not select for antibiotic resistance. Hand sanitizers also reduce infections with viruses, bacteria, and parasites that cause diarrhea [50, 5259], as well as fungi that may cause systemic infections [51]. It appears then that alcohol-based hand sanitizers, particularly those with high concentrations of ethanol, might join the armamentarium of preventative efforts against the representative ocular pathogens tested here, particularly where water is scarce, so that hand washing with soap is not possible. In the case of C. trachomatis, hand sanitizers might contribute to the facial cleanliness arm of the WHO’s SAFE strategy to combat trachoma [43].

Cons of alcohol-based hand sanitizers

Alcohols do not treat current eye infections, which are treated with antibiotics +/- surgery. Because of the potential of alcohols to damage the corneal epithelium, they cannot be used to wash eyes or to wash hands immediately before handling contact lenses. As cysts, conidia, and elementary bodies were treated with alcohols while present in test tubes rather than on the human skin, it is possible that the efficiency of killing maybe less when hands are washed with hand sanitizers. Consistent with the experience of hand washing with soap and water, efficacy of hand sanitizers likely varies dramatically with thoroughness and time spent washing hands, as well as its consistency. Drying effects of alcohols, particularly when used in high concentrations, may also reduce their routine use. Finally, because the eye pathology caused by infections with Acanthamoeba, F. solarium, and C. trachomatis occurs on a long time scale, it may be difficult to measure the efficacy of introducing hand sanitizers to a particular community. Despite these limitations, there may be role of alcohol-based hand sanitizers, which rapidly kill infectious forms of Acanthamoeba, F. solarium, and C. trachomatis, in reducing transmission of these important eye pathogens.

Funding Statement

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R01 AI048082 (JS), R01 AI078894 (RRI), and T32 AI007309 (RR). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Data Availability

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

References

1. Khan NA. Emerging Protozoan Pathogens. New York: Taylor and Francis Group; 2009.
2. Cope JR, Collier SA, Rao MM, Chalmers R, Mitchell GL, Richdale K, et al. Contact lens wearer demographics and risk behaviors for contact lens-related eye infections—United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64: 865–870. [PubMed]
3. Lorenzo-Morales J, Martín-Navarro CM, López-Arencibia A, Arnalich-Montiel F, Piñero JE, Valladares B. Acanthamoeba keratitis: an emerging disease gathering importance worldwide? Trends Parasitol. 2013;29: 181–187. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2013.01.006 [PubMed]
4. Siddiqui R, Khan NA. Biology and pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5: 6 doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-6 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Satlin MJ, Graham JK, Visvesvara GS, Mena H, Marks KM, Saal SD, et al. Fulminant and fatal encephalitis caused by Acanthamoeba in a kidney transplant recipient: case report and literature review. Transpl Infect Dis. 2013;15: 619–626. doi: 10.1111/tid.12131 [PubMed]
6. Khan NA, Siddiqui R. Predator vs aliens: bacteria interactions with Acanthamoeba. Parasitology. 2014;141: 869–874. doi: 10.1017/S003118201300231X [PubMed]
7. Tosetti N, Croxatto A, Greub G. Amoebae as a tool to isolate new bacterial species, to discover new virulence factors and to study the host-pathogen interactions. Microb Pathog. 2014;77: 125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.07.009 [PubMed]
8. Van der Henst C, Scrignari T, Maclachlan C, Blokesch M. An intracellular replication niche for Vibrio cholerae in the amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii. ISME J. 2016; 10: 897–910. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.165 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Vieira A, Seddon AM, Karlyshev AV. Campylobacter-Acanthamoeba interactions. Microbiology. 2015;161: 933–947. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000075 [PubMed]
10. Abergel C, Legendre M, Claverie JM. The rapidly expanding universe of giant viruses: Mimivirus, Pandoravirus, Pithovirus and Mollivirus. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015;39: 779–796. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv037 [PubMed]
11. La Scola B. Looking at protists as a source of pathogenic viruses. Microb Pathog. 2014;77: 131–135. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.09.005 [PubMed]
12. Clarke M, Lohan AJ, Liu B, Lagkouvardos I, Roy S, Zafar N, et al. Genome of Acanthamoeba castellanii highlights extensive lateral gene transfer and early evolution of tyrosine kinase signaling. Genome Biol. 2013;14: R11 doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-2-r11 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Lloyd D. Encystment in Acanthamoeba castellanii: a review. Exp Parasitol. 2014;145 Suppl: S20–S27. [PubMed]
14. Khan NA. Acanthamoeba: biology and increasing importance in human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006;30: 564–595. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00023.x [PubMed]
15. Feng X, Zheng W, Wang Y, Zhao D, Jiang X, Lv S. A rabbit model of Acanthamoeba keratitis that better reflects the natural human infection. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2015;298: 1509–1517. [PubMed]
16. Lee JY, Song SM, Moon EK, Lee YR, Jha BK, Danne DB, et al. Cysteine protease inhibitor (AcStefin) is required for complete cyst formation of Acanthamoeba. Eukaryot Cell 2013;12: 567–574. doi: 10.1128/EC.00308-12 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Suryawanshi A, Cao Z, Sampson JF, Panjwani N. IL-17A-mediated protection against Acanthamoeba keratitis. J Immunol. 2015;194: 650–663. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302707 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Clarke B, Sinha A, Parmar DN, Sykakis E. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis. J Ophthalmol. 2012; 484892 doi: 10.1155/2012/484892 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Baig AM, Zuberi H, Khan NA. Recommendations for the management of Acanthamoeba keratitis. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63: 770–771. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.069237-0 [PubMed]
20. Lonnen J, Putt KS, Kernick ER, Lakkis C, May L, Pugh RB. The efficacy of Acanthamoeba cyst kill and effects upon contact lenses of a novel ultraviolet lens disinfection system. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158: 460–468. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.05.032 [PubMed]
21. Siddiqui R, Lakhundi S, Khan NA. Status of the effectiveness of contact lens solutions against keratitis-causing pathogens. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38: 34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2014.09.001 [PubMed]
22. Kalkanci A, Ozdek S. Ocular fungal infections. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36: 179–189. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2010.533810 [PubMed]
23. Thomas PA, Kaliamurthy J. Mycotic keratitis: epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19: 210–220. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12126 [PubMed]
24. Leslie JF, Summerell BA. The Fusarium laboratory manual. 1st ed Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2006.
25. Ma LJ, Geiser DM, Proctor RH, Rooney AP, O'Donnell K, Trail F, et al. Fusarium pathogenomics. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2013;67: 399–416. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155650 [PubMed]
26. Desjardins AE. From yellow rain to green wheat: 25 years of trichothecene biosynthesis research. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57: 4478–4484. doi: 10.1021/jf9003847 [PubMed]
27. Gopinathan U, Garg P, Fernandes M, Sharma S, Athmanathan S, Rao GN. The epidemiological features and laboratory results of fungal keratitis: a 10-year review at a referral eye care center in South India. Cornea 2002;21: 555–559. [PubMed]
28. He D, Hao J, Zhang B, Yang Y, Song W, Zhang Y, et al. Pathogenic spectrum of fungal keratitis and specific identification of Fusarium solani. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52: 2804–2808. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5977 [PubMed]
29. Epstein AB. In the aftermath of the Fusarium keratitis outbreak: What have we learned? Clin Ophthalmol. 2007;1: 355–366. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Dursun D, Fernandez V, Miller D, Alfonso EC. Advanced Fusarium keratitis progressing to endophthalmitis. Cornea. 2003;22: 300–303. [PubMed]
31. Nucci M, Anaisse E. Fusarium Infections in Immunocompromised Patients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20: 695–704. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00014-07 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Thomas PA. Current perspectives on ophthalmic mycoses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16: 730–797. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.4.730-797.2003 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Klotz SA, Penn CC, Negvesky GJ, Butrus SI. Fungal and parasitic infections of the eye. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13: 662–685. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Xie L, Dong X, Shi W. Treatment of fungal keratitis by penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85: 1070–1074. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.9.1070 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Antequera P, Garcia-Conca V, Martín-González C, Ortiz-de-la-Tabla V. Multidrug resistant Fusarium keratitis. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2015;90: 382–384. doi: 10.1016/j.oftal.2014.04.008 [PubMed]
36. Rep M, Kistler HC. The genomic organization of plant pathogenicity in Fusarium species. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13: 420–426. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.004 [PubMed]
37. Zhang H, Wang L, Li Z, Liu S, Xie Y, He S, et al. A novel murine model of Fusarium solani keratitis utilizing fluorescent labeled fungi. Exp Eye Res. 2013;110: 1107–1112. [PubMed]
38. Abou Shousha M, Santos AR, Oechsler RA, Iovieno A, Maestre-Mesa J, Ruggeri M et al. A novel rat contact lens model for Fusarium keratitis. Mol Vis. 2013;19: 2596–2605. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Taylor HR, Burton MJ, Haddad D, West S, Wright H. Trachoma. Lancet. 2014;384: 2142–2152. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62182-0 [PubMed]
40. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Opthamol 2012;96: 614–618. [PubMed]
41. Martin DL, Bid R, Sandi F, Goodhew EB, Massae PA, Lasway A, et al. Serology for trachoma surveillance after cessation of mass drug administration. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9: e0003555 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003555 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. West SK, Bailey R, Munoz B, Edwards T, Mkocha H, Gaydos C, et al. A randomized trial of two coverage targets for mass treatment with azithromycin for trachoma. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7: e2415 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002415 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. WHO Alliance for the Global Elimination of Blinding Trachoma by the year 2020. Progress report on elimination of trachoma, 2013. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2014;89: 421–428. [PubMed]
44. Merbs S, Resnikoff S, Kello AB Mariotti S, Greene G, West SK. Trichiasis surgery for trachoma. Second Edition Geneva: WHO Press; 2015.
45. Ho DK, Sawicki C, Grassly N. Antibiotic Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae after Azithromycin Distribution for Trachoma. J Trop Med. 2015; 2015: 917370 doi: 10.1155/2015/917370 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Ejere HO, Alhassan MB, Rabiu M. Face washing promotion for preventing active trachoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2: CD003659. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Stocks ME, Ogden S, Haddad D, Addiss DG, McGuire C, Freeman MC. Effect of water, sanitation, and hygiene on the prevention of trachoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2014;11: e1001605 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001605 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. Four billion people facing water scarcity. Science Adv. 2016; 2: e1500323. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. WHO, UN-Water. Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking Water (GLAAS). Geneva: WHO Press; 2014.
50. Bloomfield SF, Aiello AE, Cookson B, O’Boyle C, Larson EL. The effectiveness of hand hygiene procedures in reducing the risks of infections in home and community settings including handwashing and alcohol-based hand sanitizers. Amer J Infect Control 2007;35: S27–S64.
51. Fendler E, Groziak P. Efficacy of alcohol-based hand sanitizers against fungi and viruses. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23: 61–62. doi: 10.1086/503455 [PubMed]
52. Hedin G, Blomkvist A, Janson M, Lindblom A. Occurrence of potentially pathogenic bacteria on the hands of hospital patients before and after the introduction of patient hand disinfection. APMIS. 2012;120: 802–827. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2012.02912.x [PubMed]
53. Kampf G, Meyer B, Goroncy-Bermes P. Comparison of two test methods for the determination of sufficient antimicrobial activity of three commonly used alcohol-based hand rubs for hygienic hand disinfection. J Hosp Infect. 2003;55: 220–225. [PubMed]
54. Luby SP, Kadir MA, Yushuf Sharker MA, Yeasmin F, Unicomb L, Sirajul Islam M. A community-randomised controlled trial promoting waterless hand sanitizer and handwashing with soap, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15: 1508–1516. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02648.x [PubMed]
55. Martin DL, Bid R, Sandi F, Goodhew EB, Massae PA, Lasway A, et al. Hand carriage of Candida occurs at lesser rates in hospital personnel who use antimicrobial hand disinfectant. Scand J Infect Dis. 2014;46: 633–666. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2014.922694 [PubMed]
56. Pittet D, Allegranzi B, Boyce J; World Health Organization World Alliance for Patient Safety First Global Patient Safety Challenge Core Group of Experts. The World Health Organization Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care and their consensus recommendations. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30: 611–622. doi: 10.1086/600379 [PubMed]
57. Prazuck T, Compte-Nguyen G, Pelat C, Sunder S, Blanchon T. Reducing gastroenteritis occurrences and their consequences in elementary schools with alcohol-based hand sanitizers. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;29: 994–998. [PubMed]
58. Todd EC, Michaels BS, Holah J, Smith D, Greig JD, Bartleson CA. Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 10. Alcohol-based antiseptics for hand disinfection and a comparison of their effectiveness with soaps. J. Food Prot. 2010;73: 2128–2140. [PubMed]
59. Zarpellon MN, Soares VS, Albrecht NR, Bergamasco DR, Garcia LB, Cardoso CL. Comparison of 3 alcohol gels and 70% ethyl alcohol for hand hygiene. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29: 960–962. doi: 10.1086/591092 [PubMed]
60. Chatterjee A, Bandini G, Motari E, Samuelson J. Ethanol and isopropanol in concentrations present in hand sanitizers sharply reduce excystation of Giardia and Entamoeba and eliminate oral infectivity of Giardia cysts in gerbils. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59: 6749–6754. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01290-15 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Jensen T, Barnes WG, Meyers D. Axenic cultivation of large populations of Acanthamoeba castellanii (JBM). J. Parasitol. 1970;56: 904–906. [PubMed]
62. Martín-Navarro CM, López-Arencibia A, Sifaoui I, Reyes-Batlle M, Cabello-Vílchez AM, Maciver S, Valladares B, et al. PrestoBlue® and AlamarBlue® are equally useful as agents to determine the viability of Acanthamoeba trophozoites. Exp Parasitol. 2014;145 Suppl: S69–72. [PubMed]
63. Stocks SM. Mechanism and Use of the Commercially Available Viability Stain, BacLight. Cytometry. 2003;61: 189–195. [PubMed]
64. Kari L, Whitmire WM, Carlson JH, Crane DD, Reveneau N, Nelson DE, et al. Pathogenic diversity among Chlamydia trachomatis ocular strains in nonhuman primates is affected by subtle genomic variations. J Infect Dis 2008;197: 449–456. doi: 10.1086/525285 [PubMed]
65. Kari L, Whitmire WM, Olivares-Zavaleta N, Goheen MM, Taylor LD et al. A live-attenuated chlamydial vaccine protects against trachoma in nonhuman primates. J Exp Med. 2011;208: 2217–2223. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111266 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. O’Connell CM, Ionova IA, Quayle AJ, Visintin A, Ingalls RR. Localization of TLR2 and MyD88 to Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions. Evidence for signaling by intracellular TLR2 during infection with an obligate intracellular pathogen. J Biol Chem. 2006;281: 1652–1659. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510182200 [PubMed]
67. Connor CG, Hopkins SL, Salisbury RD. Effectivity of contact lens disinfection systems against Acanthamoeba culbertsoni. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68: 138–141. [PubMed]
68. Coulon C, Collignon A, McDonnell G, Thomas V. Resistance of Acanthamoeba cysts to disinfection treatments used in health care settings. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48: 2689–2697. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00309-10 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Dupuy M, Berne F, Herbelin P, Binet M, Berthelot N, Rodier MH, et al. Sensitivity of free-living amoeba trophozoites and cysts to water disinfectants. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2014;217: 335–339. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.07.007 [PubMed]
70. Ezz Eldin HM, Sarhan RM. Cytotoxic effect of organic solvents and surfactant agents on Acanthamoeba castellanii cysts. Parasitol Res. 2014;113: 1949–1953. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3845-5 [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science