We investigated the role of
S. pombe EB1 family member in mitosis by screening for suppressors that were able to rescue the
mal3 mutant phenotypes, namely, TBZ hypersensitivity and increased chromosome loss. The most frequently isolated suppressor,
spc7+, codes for an essential component of the kinetochore, thus demonstrating that Mal3 plays a role at the spindle–kinetochore interface. Members of the EB1 family have been shown to be associated with kinetochores (
Juwana et al., 1999 
;
Fodde et al., 2001 
;
Kaplan et al., 2001 
;
Rehberg and Graf, 2002 
;
Tirnauer et al., 2002a 
), but the interaction partner at the kinetochore has remained unclear. The finding that the
S. cerevisiae Spc105 protein seems to be a homolog of Spc7 implies that this interaction at the spindle–kinetochore interface has been conserved.
The Spc7 protein is an essential component of the
S. pombe kinetochore that associates specifically with the central centromere region, implying that this region is required for kinetochore–microtubule association. Although phenotypic analysis of various
S. pombe kinetochore mutants had suggested that this region is needed for kinetochore–microtubule association (
Saitoh et al., 1997 
;
Goshima et al., 1999 
;
Jin et al., 2002 
;
Pidoux et al., 2003 
), Spc7 is the first central centromere region protein for which a direct involvement at the kinetochore–microtubule interface has been demonstrated. In support of this finding, Dis1, a member of the TOG/XMAP215 family of microtubule-associated proteins, is associated with this region in mitosis, although the other XMAP215 homologue in
S. pombe, Alp14/Mtc1, shows a somewhat different localization (
Garcia et al., 2001 
;
Nakaseko et al., 2001 
). Association of Mal3 with a specific centromere region needs yet to be demonstrated. Our attempts to map the centromere region with which Mal3 interacts by using ChIP followed by multiplex PCR were not successful (our unpublished data). However, given the finding that Spc7 and Mal3 could be coimmunoprecipitated, it is feasible that Mal3 is associated with the central centromere region.
Enrichment of the central region DNA sequences in Spc7 ChIPs was repeatedly twofold lower than that of another central region-associated protein, namely, Mal2. This might imply that in an assembled kinetochore Spc7 is physically further away from the centromeric DNA than Mal2. Ultrastructural analysis has shown that
S. pombe centromeres are multilayered structures (
Kniola et al., 2001 
). In particular, the Ndc80 complex, with which Spc7 is probably associated, was shown to be part of an “anchor structure” close to the SPB and distinct from the localization of the
S. pombe CENP-A homolog Cnp1 (
Kniola et al., 2001 
). Consistent with this observation, we found that in the majority of interphase cells the Spc7 signal was further away from the nuclear periphery than the Mal2 signal.
Our experimental data indicate that the role of the Spc7 protein at the kinetochore is that of linking the kinetochore to microtubule-plus ends and possibly influencing the dynamics of kinetochore microtubules. First,
spc7+ rescued the increased chromosome loss phenotype of a
mal3 mutant strain and can be coimmunoprecipitated with the microtubule plus-end protein Mal3. Second, overexpression of an Spc7 variant (Spc7-C) led to a dominant negative phenotype and kinetochores that were not associated with the mitotic spindle, implying that Spc7 affects kinetochore–microtubule interactions. Third, preliminary evidence indicates that Spc7 might have a role in microtubule dynamics. Extra
spc7+ is able to rescue the TBZ-hypersensitivity of specific strains such as
mal3 mutants and the Ran mutant
spi1-25. Overexpression of full-length Spc7 increases the resistance of cells to the microtubule destabilizing drug TBZ, whereas overproduction of Spc7-C has the opposite effect. Fourth, the
S. cerevisiae kinetochore protein Spc105 can partially suppress the phenotypes of
S. pombe mal3 mutant strains, suggesting that Spc7 and Spc105 might be functionally homologous. We identified Spc105, as a copurification partner of the Ndc80 complex. The highly conserved Ndc80/HEC1 kinetochore complex is required for the establishment and maintenance of kinetochore–microtubule interactions and plays a role in spindle checkpoint activity (
He et al., 2001 
;
Janke et al., 2001 
;
Wigge and Kilmartin, 2001 
;
DeLuca et al., 2002 
;
Bharadwaj et al., 2004 
;
McCleland et al., 2004 
). Spc105 also has been found recently in affinity purifications of
S. cerevisiae kinetochore proteins that define the Mtw1p complex (
De Wulf et al., 2003 
;
Nekrasov et al., 2003 
). Furthermore, Spc105 affinity purification has been described to contain components of the Ndc80 complex (
Nekrasov et al., 2003 
). Our finding that Spc105 copurifies with the Ndc80 complex component Spc24 confirms that Spc105 is in proximity to the Ndc80 complex. The fact that Spc105 was not detected in Ndc80 preparations (
Nekrasov et al., 2003 
) might reflect the fact that Spc105 is more closely associated with Spc24 than Ndc80. Alternatively, this might be due to differences in the experimental conditions.
Homologues of the Ndc80 complex also exist in
S. pombe and have been shown to be part of the kinetochore (
Kniola et al., 2001 
;
Wigge and Kilmartin, 2001 
). It is at present unclear whether Spc7 is closely associated with or part of this complex. However, Spc7 can be coimmunoprecipitated by the
S. pombe Spc24 protein and vice versa (Kerres and Fleig, unpublished data). Furthermore, Spc24, like Spc7, is associated with the central centromere region (Kerres and Fleig, unpublished data). It is thus feasible to propose that Spc7 is associated with the
S. pombe Ndc80 complex.
The identification of Spc7/Spc105, as a suppressor of the
mal3 mutant phenotype implies that the Ndc80 complex or proteins in proximity to this complex might possibly play a more direct role in association with microtubule plus-ends than previously envisaged (reviewed in
Cheeseman et al., 2002 
). Interestingly, components of the Ndc80 complex as well as Spc105 but not inner kinetochore proteins such as Ndc10 were identified in enriched SPB preparations (
Wigge et al., 1998 
).
Our experimental data suggest that one of the factors required for kinetochore–microtubule association is an interaction between the kinetochore protein Spc7 and the microtubule plus-end–associated protein Mal3. The Ran GTPase seems to play a role in this specific association as extra Spc7 can rescue a
spi1 mutation, which results in a decrease in the amount of active Ran in cells that are competent for nucleocytoplasmic transport (
Fleig et al., 2000 
;
Salus et al., 2002 
). Recently, Ran has been implicated in kinetochore function as the GTPase activating proteins Ran GAP1 and RanBP2 are associated with metaphase kinetochores and
Caenorhabditis elegans Ran was localized to kinetochores, where it seemed to play a role in the association of kinetochore microtubules to chromosomes (
Bamba et al., 2002 
;
Joseph et al., 2002 
). Furthermore, in
Xenopus egg extracts the spindle checkpoint and the kinetochore association of spindle checkpoint proteins is directly regulated by Ran-GTP levels (
Arnaoutov and Dasso, 2003 
).
What is the function of Mal3 at the kinetochore–microtubule interface? Our coimmunoprecipitation analysis suggests that the interaction between Spc7 and Mal3 is not a stable one, thus making it unlikely that the main role of Mal3 is that of continuous microtubule–kinetochore attachment. In support of this is the finding that the kinetochore localization of EB1 was restricted to a subset of early mitotic kinetochores that were associated with polymerizing microtubule plus-ends (
Tirnauer et al., 2002a 
). It is thus more feasible that Mal3 has a role in regulating microtubule dynamics at the kinetochore. The effect of EB1 family members on microtubule dynamics has been amply documented (
Beinhauer et al., 1997 
;
Tirnauer et al., 1999 
;
Nakamura et al., 2001 
;
Busch and Brunner, 2004 
). Absence of EB1 family members leads to reduced microtubule length, whereas overexpression of EB1 bundles microtubules (
Bu and Su, 2001 
;
Nakamura et al., 2001 
;
Rogers et al., 2002 
;
Tirnauer et al., 2002b 
;
Ligon et al., 2003 
). Furthermore, Mal3 affects microtubule dynamics by initiating microtubule growth and inhibiting catastrophe events in interphase microtubule arrays (
Beinhauer et al., 1997 
;
Busch and Brunner, 2004 
). Because overexpression of Spc7 makes wild-type cells more resistant to microtubule-destabilizing drugs, we would like to suggest that Mal3 and Spc7 are part of the complex protein machinery that modulates the dynamic behavior of microtubules at the kinetochore. In this context, it is interesting to note that the ability of EB1 to promote microtubule polymerization was dependent on the presence of the C-terminal part of APC, suggesting that EB1 function is modulated by other proteins (
Nakamura et al., 2001 
). Whether Spc7 has a similar effect on the function of Mal3 or whether it acts in this process but independently of Mal3 remains to be determined.