PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of oncotargetLink to Publisher's site
 
Oncotarget. 2016 September 13; 7(37): 58743–58758.
Published online 2016 August 16. doi:  10.18632/oncotarget.11318
PMCID: PMC5312272

Computational drugs repositioning identifies inhibitors of oncogenic PI3K/AKT/P70S6K-dependent pathways among FDA-approved compounds

Abstract

The discovery of inhibitors for oncogenic signalling pathways remains a key focus in modern oncology, based on personalized and targeted therapeutics. Computational drug repurposing via the analysis of FDA-approved drug network is becoming a very effective approach to identify therapeutic opportunities in cancer and other human diseases. Given that gene expression signatures can be associated with specific oncogenic mutations, we tested whether a “reverse” oncogene-specific signature might assist in the computational repositioning of inhibitors of oncogenic pathways. As a proof of principle, we focused on oncogenic PI3K-dependent signalling, a molecular pathway frequently driving cancer progression as well as raising resistance to anticancer-targeted therapies. We show that implementation of “reverse” oncogenic PI3K-dependent transcriptional signatures combined with interrogation of drug networks identified inhibitors of PI3K-dependent signalling among FDA-approved compounds. This led to repositioning of Niclosamide (Niclo) and Pyrvinium Pamoate (PP), two anthelmintic drugs, as inhibitors of oncogenic PI3K-dependent signalling. Niclo inhibited phosphorylation of P70S6K, while PP inhibited phosphorylation of AKT and P70S6K, which are downstream targets of PI3K. Anthelmintics inhibited oncogenic PI3K-dependent gene expression and showed a cytostatic effect in vitro and in mouse mammary gland. Lastly, PP inhibited the growth of breast cancer cells harbouring PI3K mutations. Our data indicate that drug repositioning by network analysis of oncogene-specific transcriptional signatures is an efficient strategy for identifying oncogenic pathway inhibitors among FDA-approved compounds. We propose that PP and Niclo should be further investigated as potential therapeutics for the treatment of tumors or diseases carrying the constitutive activation of the PI3K/P70S6K signalling axis.

Keywords: oncogenes, PI3K-dependent pathways, gene expression signatures, drugs network, FDA-approved drugs

INTRODUCTION

Targeted inhibition of oncogenic signalling pathways represents the main goal of modern oncology: selective inhibitors of oncogenes such as mutated kinases have been identified mainly through traditional small molecule drug screening, aimed at identifying inhibitors of their catalytic activity or cellular localization. However, ever-increasing failure rates, high cost, unsatisfactory safety profile, and limited efficacy are often associated with such traditional drug screens. Moreover, these inhibitors, even when effective, show paradigms of primary or secondary resistance [1], [2], highlighting the need for novel efficacious and cost-effective strategies to identify efficacious modulators of oncogenic pathways in cells. Gene signatures associated with oncogenic activation of molecular pathways may offer novel opportunities for targeted therapeutics discovery in cancer. Specific gene expression signatures can be associated with oncogenic mutations and deregulated signalling pathways in tumors [3], [4], [5]. One opportunity to implement these molecular data into drug discovery is offered by the inspection of drug networks. These networks can be derived by computing the similarity between gene signatures generated by drug treatments in specific cell lines, with the assumption that each drug treatment generates a drug-specific signature [6]. In this drug-network, drugs can be grouped into communities composed of drugs that produce similar transcriptional profiles and hence may act through a similar Mode of Action (MoA) [7]. This network-based analysis allows to identify the MoA of novel compounds, as well as, to repurpose drugs for novel therapeutic indications (“drug repositioning”) [7], [8]. Moreover, the inspection of drug networks with disease- or oncogene-associated signatures might help repositioning drugs able to “revert” a disease signature and, thus, the disease phenotype [9].

The PI3K proto-oncogene and its downstream pathways offer a relevant paradigm of targeted therapies in oncology. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR/-dependent pathways include key modulators of cell proliferation, survival and metabolism in epithelial cells [10], [11]. The aberrant activation of these pathways has been identified as the determinant driver event of tumorigenesis and constitutes an important factor in the anticancer drug response and clinical prognosis in different tumor types [12], [13], [14]. In epithelial cancer, the PI3K-dependent signalling pathway is most frequently activated by genetic alteration such as gene copy number variation or somatic mutations in PIK3CA, the gene encoding the p110α catalytic subunit of PI3K or inactivating mutations in PTEN [15], [16]. Three recurrent oncogenic “hotspots” account for the majority of somatic PIK3CA mutations. Two of these mutations, E542K and E545K, occur in the helical domain, and the third mutation, H1047R, affects the kinase domain. All three mutations result in enhanced lipid kinase activity and activation of downstream targets such as the AKT, P70S6K and S6 proteins. Pharmacological strategies aimed at inhibiting the oncogenic activation of the PI3K-dependent pathways are under active pre-clinical and clinical investigation [17], [18], [19]. However, paradigms of tumor resistance after PI3K/mTOR inhibitor treatments are emerging [20], [21], highlighting the need for alternative approaches to inhibit this pathway.

To test whether an oncogene specific gene signature might assist in computational repositioning of selective inhibitors of oncogenic pathways, we used the PI3K oncogene as a test case. The approach is based on the following hypothesis: if the gene signature summarizing the effect of a drug is “anti-similar” with an oncogenic pathway-derived signature, it is reasonable to expect that this drug acts as pathway inhibitor, able to revert the oncogenic signature. To this end, we queried a drug network with an anti-similar (or reverse) oncogenic PI3K-dependent gene signature derived from somatic knock-in cellular models. Computational analysis effectively identified well-known selective inhibitors of PI3K-dependent signalling among FDA-approved compounds. Moreover, we repositioned Niclosamide (Niclo) and Pyrvinium Pamoate (PP), two anthelmintic drugs, as effective inhibitors of oncogenic PI3K-dependent signalling by inhibiting the activation of the AKT/P70S6K signalling axis.

RESULTS

Gene expression-based drug network analysis repositioned anthelminthic drugs as potential inhibitors of oncogenic PI3K-dependent pathways

We have previously developed a computational approach to predict drug MoA and drug repurposing by using the analysis of the Connectivity Map (Cmap) [22], a compendium of gene expression profiles (GEPs) following drug treatment of human cell lines with 1,309 bioactive small molecules. The approach was based on generating a single “prototype” ranked list (PRL) of differentially expressed genes for each drug following treatment across multiple cell lines, or at different dosages [7, 23]. We have developed a new version, online community-based resource (referred as MANTRA 2.0) that supports this process by exploiting similarities between drug-induced and disease-induced transcriptional profiles [24]. To reposition FDA-approved drugs that might act as inhibitors of oncogenic PI3K­-dependent pathways, we queried the MANTRA 2.0 drug network. To generate oncogenic PI3K-dependent gene signatures, we took advantage of isogenic Knock-In (KI) cell lines, in which a normal allele in non-transformed human mammary epithelial cells had been replaced with PIK3CA(E545K) or PIK3CA(H1047R) alleles by somatic adenovirus-mediated recombination [25-27]. Since these cells essentially differ from their isogenic wild type counterpart in the expression of mutated PIK3CA protein only, they allow for the generation of a specific bona-fide oncogenic PI3K-dependent gene signature. From each signature, we generated a PIK3CA-reverse signature by sorting genes in reverse order of differential expression (i.e. the most down-regulated ranked at the top of the signature, while the most up-regulated at the bottom) to generate a gene expression profile associated with inhibition of oncogenic PI3K-dependent pathways (Figure (Figure1A1A and M&M). We also used a gene expression signature obtained from a MCF10A cell line carrying the PIK3CA(H1047R) mutation treated with GDC-941, a selective inhibitor of the catalytic subunit of PI3K. Thus, we generated three new nodes in the MANTRA network here referred to as: 1) PIK3CA(E545K)-reverse; 2) PIK3CA(H1047R)-reverse and 3) PIK3CA (H1047R) plus inhibitor (Figure (Figure1A).1A). Computational distance analysis of these transcriptional signatures in the MANTRA 2.0 network allowed us to identify drugs and communities with significant distance (threshold ≤0.86) from each of the PIK3CA-specific nodes (Figure (Figure1A1A and Table S1). Compounds common to all three networks were then selected (Figure (Figure1B1B and Table S1). This produced a list of 27 compounds (Table (Table1)1) that are predicted to generate transcriptional signatures with significant similarity to the ones generated by the inhibition of oncogenic PI3K signalling. In support of the predictive power of our approach, we identified LY-294002 and Wortmannin, two well-known inhibitors of p110α catalytic subunit of PI3K. We also identified Sirolimus (rapamycin), a clinically relevant small molecule inhibitor of mTOR pathway and Quinostatin, an inhibitor of the p110α catalitic subunit of PI3K [28] (Table (Table1).1). Drug-network analysis also allows us to identify enrichment of drug communities from each of the PIK3CA-specific nodes (Table S2), indicating drug classes significantly close to each node. Inspection of communiti enrichment common to all three nodes strongly suggested that antipsychotics, sodium/calcium decreasers, calcium channel blockers and Na+/K+-ATPase (sodium potassium) membrane pump inhibitors are predicted to negatively regulate PI3K-dependent signalling in-silico. On the other hand, data in Table S2 also indicate that these drug classes might inhibit PI3K-dependent signalling as a potential off-target effect. Notably, the repositioning approaches based on “reverse” genetic signatures (networks 1+2) was sufficient to identify 6 out of top 10 communities identified through the use of a specific inhibitor-derived signature, thus indicating that the “reverse” signature-based strategy could help in repositioning studies for which specific pathway inhibitors are not yet available.

Table 1
Rank-ordered list of compounds after MANTRA 2.0 query and post-processed selection
Figure 1
Computational drug repositioning identifies possible inhibitors of the PI3K-dependent pathway

Among selected drugs (Table (Table1),1), we focused our attention on Niclosamide (Niclo) and Pyrvinium Pamoate (PP), two FDA-approved anthelmintic drugs, as a result of following considerations: i) recent preclinical data have outlined anticancer effects of both compounds in several in vitro and in vivo cancer models [29-33]; ii) the possibility that these compounds can inhibit the oncogenic activation of PI3K-dependent pathways was never directly tested. We thus decided to experimentally validate the in silico repositioning of PP or Niclo acting as inhibitors of oncogenic, constitutively active, PI3K-dependent signalling.

Niclo and PP control oncogenic PIK3CA-dependent gene expression

In order to confirm the effective regulation of gene expression by Niclo and PP and their ability to “reverse” the oncogenic PI3K-dependent gene expression signature, we selected, among the most up-regulated and down-regulated genes from the PIK3CA(E545K)-reverse signature, a short list of genes predicted to be regulated by either PP or Niclo (Table S2). mRNA analysis from wild type HME cells or isogenic cells carrying the PIK3CA(E545K) allele confirmed that these genes were differentially regulated in oncogene-carrying cells compared with wild type control cells (Figure (Figure2A).2A). The treatment with PP or Niclo was sufficient to increase the expression of genes such as hCCNG2, hHBP1, hIL8, hHEY1, hTGFA and hCSGALNACT1 that were down regulated by mutated PIK3CA (Figure (Figure2A).2A). In contrast, up-regulated genes such as hCCNE2, hDSCC1, hENDOD1 and hPPP2R1B were strongly inhibited following PP or Niclo treatments (Figure (Figure2B).2B). PP or Niclo treatments did not change the expression levels of other oncogenic PI3K-target genes, such as hAXIN1 and hAXIN2 belonging to the WNT pathway (Figure (Figure2C),2C), thus suggesting a degree of specificity of these drugs towards PI3K target genes. These results demonstrated that: i) PP and Niclo regulate a subset of genes that are under the control of PI3K-dependent pathways; ii) both drugs are able to reverse oncogene-driven gene expression.

Figure 2
Niclo and PP effectively control oncogenic PI3K-dependent gene expression

PP and Niclo do inhibit AKT/P70S6K phosphorylation

We investigated the molecular mechanism by which PP and Niclo inhibited PI3K-dependent signalling and, thus, target gene expression. Niclo neither directly bound nor inhibited the p110α subunit of PI3K, as tested by an in vitro binding assay (Figure S1). PP was reported in the literature to be inactive against PI3K [34] [39]. We therefore implemented an antigen-capture-based assay to test whether PP and Niclo increased or decreased the phosphorylation and the activation of selected proteins belonging to the PI3K-dependent signalling cascade. We observed that treatment with Niclo significantly decreased P70S6K and S6 phosphorylation in cells carrying oncogenic PI3K (Figure S2). Conversely, PP treatment reduced P70S6K phosphorylation without affecting S6 phosphorylation (Figure S2). We confirmed these results by immunoblot analysis, demonstrating that Niclo treatment strongly inhibited P70S6K and S6 phosphorylation in both wild type and PIK3CA mutated cells (Figure (Figure3A).3A). PP treatment also inhibited P70S6K phosphorylayion but, notably it had a minimal effect on S6 phosphorylation after two hours of treatment (Figure (Figure3A).3A). We also observed a small, but significant, inhibition of AKT phosphorylation by PP. We subsequently evaluated the effect of PP and Niclo treatment during serum stimulation, which is known to activate PI3K-dependent pathways. Under these conditions, AKT, P70S6K and S6 phosphorylation were activated by the PI3K activity, as demonstrated by LY treatment (Figure (Figure3B).3B). Similarly, both PP and Niclo treatment strongly inhibited P70S6K phosphorylation (Figure (Figure3B).3B). In addition, we confirmed that PP did also inhibit AKT phosphorylation, conceivably acting as a dual inhibitor. In contrast to Niclo, PP induced a milder decrease of S6 phosphorylation (Figure (Figure3B):3B): this could be explained through the activation of additional kinases, such as RSK [35] or by varying degrees of P70S6K protein activity inhibition by different compounds. Overall, these results confirmed that both drugs inhibited the PI3K-dependent signalling cascade in cells carrying the PIK3CA oncogene.

Figure 3
Niclo and PP inhibit the phosphorylation of PI3K-dependent molecular targets

Results in Figure Figure3A3A and and3B3B indicated that P70S6K or P70S6K and AKT are targets of Niclo and PP, respectively. To formally prove that inhibition of their activities by PP and Niclo was mechanistically linked to the regulation of target gene expression, we pharmacologically inhibited P70S6K by using Rapamycin, a well-known inhibitor of mTOR which is an upstream activator of P70S6K, or PF-05212384 that similarly to PP, acts as a dual inhibitor of both PI3K and mTOR. We then analysed the expression of a subset of genes controlled by PP and Niclo. mRNA analysis demonstrated that Rapamycin was sufficient to increase the expression of hCCNG2, hHBP1 and IL8 genes in HME cells carrying oncogenic PIK3CA (Figure (Figure3C),3C), as well as in down regulating the expression of hCCNE2 and hPPP2R1B genes (Figure (Figure3D).3D). Moreover, PF-05212384 treatment was sufficient to up-regulate the expression of hCCNG2 and hHBP1 and to down regulate the expression of hCCNE2, hPPP2R1B and ENDOD1 (Figure (Figure3C3C and and3D).3D). These results indicated that: i) the selected genes were indeed under the control of AKT/P70S6K-dependent signalling; ii) Niclo and PP regulated PI3K-dependent gene expression, through the inhibition of the AKT/P70S6K axis.

Anthelmintic drugs inhibit oncogenic PI3K-dependent cellular phenotypes

We next analyzed the effect of anthelmintic drugs on the regulation of biological and cellular processes sustained by AKT/mTOR/P70S6K pathways. A major function of the AKT/mTOR molecular axis is to activate protein synthesis, which it is thought to control through several substrates, including the S6 kinases. ATP-competitive inhibitors of mTOR such as Torin, by blocking canonical mTORC1-dependent events, such as the phosphorylation of S6K1 and 4E-BP1, impair protein synthesis and proliferation [36], [37] [38]. As a step towards defining the ability of PP and Niclo to inhibit AKT/S6K-dependent pathway and their cellular functions in the context of PI3K oncogenic mutations, we examined the effects of PP and Niclo on protein synthesis by scoring for ribosome assembly into polysomes, an early event in protein translation initiation. To focus on the direct translational outputs and avoid secondary effects, we treated cells with inhibitors for only three hours during serum stimulated-protein synthesis. Our results (Figure (Figure4A)4A) showed that, similarly to Torin2, PP or Niclo treatment was sufficient to inhibit the recruitment of ribosomes into polysomes in MCF10A (E545K) KI cells after serum stimulation. These data indicated that PP and Niclo inhibited mTOR and causes a severe defect in translation initiation.

Figure 4
Anthelmintics inhibit oncogenic PI3K-dependent cellular phenotypes

According to the inhibition of protein translation, the inhibition of mTOR/P70S6K in mammary epithelial cells has also a potent cytostatic effect [39]: one might predict that by inhibiting these kinases activities, polysomes assembly and protein translation, Niclo and PP might also elicit cytostatic effects. To test this possibility, we monitored cell proliferation and viability for 72 hours after treatment with Niclo or PP. Our results demonstrate that both drugs had potent cytostatic effects (upper panel), with very minimal cytotoxicity (lower panel) in HME (Figure (Figure4B)4B) and MCF10A cells (Figure (Figure4C).4C). As expected, Niclo and PP treatment have also cytostatic effects in isogenic cells carrying a constitutively active, mutant PIK3CA.

The oncogenic activation of PI3K-dependent signalling in mammary cells supports cellular motility, invasion and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) [27, 40-41]; moreover, PI3K/mTOR pathways accelerates wound healing [42]. We observed that EGF-deprived wild type MCF10A, but not MCF10A-PIK3CA(E545K) cells showed a 50% reduction in migration in a scratch wound healing assay indicating that, under such conditions, cell motility was activated by oncogenic PI3K signalling (Figure S3). We thus tested the ability of Niclo or PP to inhibit wound healing when selectively activated by oncogenic PI3K signals in EGF-deprived cells. The treatment with Niclo or PP was sufficient to completely inhibit the migration of MCF10A-PIK3CA(E545K) cells after 14 hours (Figure (Figure5A).5A). We also tested the ability of anthelmintic drugs to suppressing PI3K-dependent cellular invasion following stimulation by attractant hormones. Our results showed that MCF10A-PIK3CA(E545K) cells had almost a 2.5 fold increase in cells invasion compared with wild type isogenic cells (Figure 5B-5C). Treating cells with Niclo or PP significantly reduced, about 50%, the invasion of cells carrying the PIK3CA(E545K) mutation (Figure 5B-5C).

Figure 5
Niclo and PP inhibit oncogenic PI3K-mediated cellular migration

Collectively, these data demonstrate that PP and Niclo inhibited oncogenic PI3K-dependent cellular phenotypes. This confirms a successful repositioning of both drugs as negative regulators of constitutively active PI3K-dependent pathways.

PP controls mammary branching morphogenesis and PI3K-dependent signaling of mouse mammary gland tissue

We next tested the effect of anthelmintic drugs in controlling proliferation and targeting the PI3K/P706SK-dependent pathways in vivo, and we focused on PP. Since in vitro studies were performed with mammary epithelial cell lines, we assayed the effect of PP treatment in mammary gland tissue of mice. Mammary ductal morphogenesis depends on PI3K-dependent signalling and PI3K activation has been directly correlated to the control of ductal branching and alveolar cell proliferation during mammary gland development [43]. To investigate if PP, by inhibiting PI3K-dependent signaling in vivo, might suppress duct morphogenesis, we analyzed mammary gland tissue after PP treatment. Haematoxylin stained mammary gland tissue sections showed thinning ducts and a significant reduction of duct diameter in PP-treated compared to control-treated mammary glands (Figure 6A-6B), thus confirming a cytostatic effect of PP in vivo and a reduction in mammary branching morphogenesis. Immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) of mammary gland tissue sections revealed that PP effectively reduced the level of S6 and AKT protein phosphorylation compared to vehicle treated glands (Figure 6C-6D, Figure S5). Notably, a substantial reduction in protein phosphorylation was observed in both duct epithelial cells and mammary gland-associated adipocytes.

Figure 6
PP controls mammary branching morphogenesis and PI3K-dependent signaling in mouse mammary gland tissue

PP inhibits growth of breast cancer cells harbouring PIK3CA mutations

Oncogenic mutations in the PI3K pathway are frequent in breast cancers and support cancer growth as well as resistance to HER2 targeting agents: PI3K or dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors are able to kill breast cancer cells [18] and have demonstrated to have clinical benefits for the treatment of breast cancer carrying PI3K mutations [44]. We investigated if PP, by virtue of its dual AKT and P70S6K inhibitor activity, inhibited the growth of cancer cells harbouring PI3K mutations. Our results demonstrated that PP treatment was highly cytotoxic against breast cancer cells with an average inhibitory concentration 50 (Ic50) of 50nM (Figures (Figures7A7A and and7B).7B). Since PI3K mutations in HER2-positive tumors is an important determinant of resistance to anti HER2 therapy Trastuzumab [45], we next tested the ability of PP to kill such resistant cancer cells compared with Trastuzumab alone or in combination. Compared with Trastuzumab, PP treatment inhibited the growth and soft agar colony formation of Trastuzumab-resistant cancer cells (Figures (Figures7C7C and and7D).7D). Together, these data indicated that anthelminthic PP might represent a valuable pharmacological inhibitor of breast cancer cells carrying PI3K mutations.

Figure 7
PP inhibited the growth of breast cancer cells carrying PIK3CA mutations

DISCUSSION

We propose a paradigm for exploiting large databases of transcriptional genes signatures for computational repositioning of drug inhibitors against a specific oncogenic pathway, by identifying drugs able to revert the associated oncogenic gene signature. The in-silico identification of well-known inhibitors of the PI3K-dependent pathway such as Sirolimus (rapamycin), LY-294002, Wortmannin and Quinostatin demonstrates the efficacy of the methodology to identify PI3K-dependent pathway inhibitors and to potentially reposition novel compounds.

In this study, the reference signature for oncogenic, active PI3K-dependent pathways had been derived by using isogenic KI human mammary epithelial cells expressing the PIK3CA(E545K) or PIK3CA(H1057R) cancer alleles, that are suitable for generating bona-fide oncogene specific signatures. Several studies have demonstrated the potential of using gene expression profiles of cancer cells for the analysis of oncogenic pathways, and such profiles can reflect deregulation of specific pathways in cancers [3, 46]. Thus, our approach could potentially be exploited for the repositioning of drugs targeting oncogenic deregulated pathways identified by tumor-derived signatures. It is worth observing that oncogenes transcriptional outputs might differ among different tissues and this could explain the different role of oncogenic pathway among different tumors. Moreover, the cooperation among oncogenes and tumor suppressors genes, frequently occurring with tissue specificity, should be also considered. Thus, the transcriptional output of oncogenic signalling might have a certain degree of tissue specificity.

We demonstrated that nodes generated by oncogene-induced signatures or inhibitor-induced signatures are both efficient in searching for computational similarities in drug networks; however, combining both approaches would be extremely powerful, by increasing stringency for drugs discovery and by limiting the likelihood of false positive. If available, the inhibitor-induced signatures can assist the oncogene signatures-based approach in increasing the efficiency of computational repurposing methods. In the case of the PI3K pathway, the oncogene-induced signatures approach is sufficient to the computational repurposing of novel pathway inhibitors. This demonstrates the strength of the approach presented, because pathway-specific gene signatures could be generated with high efficacy by genetic manipulation (e.g., by means of somatic KI or Knock-out targeting approaches). In contrast, pharmacological inhibitors might not be available at times, as in case of “undruggable” targets. Thus, the approach presented in the manuscript could be exploited and applied to every genetically targetable oncogenic pathway.

The herein proposed drug repositioning identifies novel potential therapeutics, PP and Niclo to be further investigated for the treatment of human diseases showing a constitutive activation of PI3K/mTOR/P70S6K signalling axis. Notably, inhibitors identified by means of genetic signatures might offer opportunities to target aberrant transcriptional signatures regardless of the specific genetic lesion causing PI3K constitutive activation and thus be effective for a larger number of PI3K-dependent pathological phenotypes. Moreover, the inspection of network communities close to PI3K inhibitors might help to predict PI3K inhibitor off-target effects and, possibly, side effects.

What molecular mechanisms link Niclo and PP to PI3K-dependent pathway inhibition? Niclo and PP do not directly bind and inhibit the catalytic subunit of PI3K implying that additional or indirect mechanisms should be considered. Niclo has been previously recognized as a protonophore molecule that decreases intracellular pH by extruding protons from lysosomes, thus lowering cytoplasmic pH. This, in turn, inhibits mTORC1 signalling [47-48] and, consequently, may inhibit P70S6K phosphorylation. In agreement with our data, previous drug screens identified Niclo as a negative regulator of P70S6K, without AKT inhibition [47, 49]. Conversely, analysis of structure and reactivity similarity (Figure S4) indicated that PP profile is not as protonophore. PP has been proposed to target mitochondrial complex I [30], thus reducing oxidative phosphorylation rate and ATP production. PP treatment might produce a starvation-like condition resulting in the activation of starvation-related sensors such as AMPK, which negatively regulate both mTOR and P70S6K phosphorylation [36]. In this scenario, both PP and Niclo would act as indirect inhibitor of P70S6K activity, although further molecular studies are needed to delineate the mechanism.

In conclusion, irrespective of the PI3K pathway, we believe that our approach represents a paradigm that can complement drug discovery approaches for undruggable molecular targets or aid in cases in which traditional high-throughput drug screens of inhibitors against selective signalling pathways are likely to fail.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell lines

Mammary epithelial hTERT-HME1 (HME), MCF10A and isogenic derivatives carrying specific cancer alleles have been described previously [26] and were cultured as described [26]. The MCF7, HCC1954, BT-474, MDA-MB-361 and SKBR3 cell lines were obtained from ATCC and cultured according to the provider's instructions.

RNA target preparation/affymetrix microarray studies

Gene expression analysis was carried out using RNA extracted from sub-confluent cell cultures using an Invitrogen kit. RNA samples of sufficient quality were profiled on Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 chips. Preparation of complementary RNA, array hybridizations, scanning and subsequent array image data analysis were done using the manufacturer's specified protocol.

Evaluation and normalization of affymetrix genechip data and generation of reverse signature

The data were analyzed with the Bioconductor package “Affy” using the RMA method for normalizing and summarizing probe level intensity measurements. The profile “1” (HME­PIK3CA(E545K) - Reverse signature) had been processed before to make it compatible with the standard of Mantra. We have developed a method to convert “Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0” probes into Affymetrix HG-U133A probes (chip reference for the network of Mantra). The conversion was carried out in two steps: 1) from “Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0” probe_set_id towards “Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0” gene: each probe set id was associated with the corresponding gene, based on Affymetrix annotation. If more than one probe was found to be associated with the same gene, we assigned to the gene the rank of the probe that comes first in the ranking. 2) from “Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0” gene towards “Affymetrix HG-U-133A” probe_set_id: we associated to each gene the corresponding HG-U-133A probe set, using the Affymetrix annotation file. If a gene was associated with more than one probe set, we assigned the same ranking to all of the probes involved. For Affymetrix probes that did not generate any matches we positioned them at the center of the ranking. We then integrated them in the drug network as previously described [23]. The other two profiles were obtained from Array Express ID “E-GEOD-17785”. In this case the chip HG-U133_Plus_2 was already compatible with the reference chip of Mantra.

Mantra 2.0 analysis and community enrichment

Gene expression profiles were compared to those previously generated for 1,309 compounds (cMAP) [22] by computing the transcriptional similarity between our profiles and each of the 1,309 compounds as previously described [7]. Specifically, Affymetrix microarrays. CEL files were uploaded in the MANTRA on-line tool (http://mantra.tigem.it) and automatically transformed into a new node in the drug network [24]. MANTRA computed the transcriptional similarity between each treatment and each of the 1,309 compounds in cMAP. The transcriptional similarity is quantified as a distance, which is a number greater or equal to zero, with zero indicating identical profiles [7]. We then selected all drugs that scored below a transcriptional distance threshold of 0.86 from all our profiles. A set of 27 drugs were thus selected to be significantly similar to our signatures. Community enrichment analyses were performed as previously described [7]. According to the neighbors of each profile a hypergeometric test was applied and a pValue threshold of 0.05 was used to identify the communities more enriched for each profile.

Cell viability and soft agar colony assay were performed as previously described [26]

mRNA expression analysis, protein extraction, western blot analysis, polysomes assembly analysis, animal studies, tissue collection, histology and immunohistochemistry methods and structure overlaps are described in the Supplementary Materials.

Statistical analysis

Where appropriate, specific statistical analysis and approaches have been described in the figure legends.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FIGURES

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. S. Soddu (“Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy), Dr G. Grosveld (St. Jude Children Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee), Dr M. Muscolini (Pasteur Institute, Rome, Italy) and T. Merlino (“Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy) for critical reading of the manuscript, Rosita Lupi (Nerviano Medical Sciences) for the in vitro assay analysis and all members of the Cardone and di Bernardo laboratories for help and discussions.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

GRANT SUPPORT

L.C. lab is founded by the Italian Ministry of Health research grant number: GR-2011-02351749. F.L. is supported by Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro, grant number IG14756.

REFERENCES

1. Holohan C, Van Schaeybroeck S, Longley DB, Johnston PG. Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:714–726. [PubMed]
2. Garraway LA, Janne PA. Circumventing cancer drug resistance in the era of personalized medicine. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:214–226. [PubMed]
3. Bild AH, Yao G, Chang JT, Wang Q, Potti A, Chasse D, Joshi MB, Harpole D, Lancaster JM, Berchuck A, Olson JA, Jr, Marks JR, Dressman HK, West M, Nevins JR. Oncogenic pathway signatures in human cancers as a guide to targeted therapies. Nature. 2006;439:353–357. [PubMed]
4. Huang E, Ishida S, Pittman J, Dressman H, Bild A, Kloos M, D'Amico M, Pestell RG, West M, Nevins JR. Gene expression phenotypic models that predict the activity of oncogenic pathways. Nat Genet. 2003;34:226–230. [PubMed]
5. Furge KA, Tan MH, Dykema K, Kort E, Stadler W, Yao X, Zhou M, Teh BT. Identification of deregulated oncogenic pathways in renal cell carcinoma: an integrated oncogenomic approach based on gene expression profiling. Oncogene. 2007;26:1346–1350. [PubMed]
6. Iorio F, Rittman T, Ge H, Menden M, Saez-Rodriguez J. Transcriptional data: a new gateway to drug repositioning? Drug Discov Today. 2013;18:350–357. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Iorio F, Isacchi A, di Bernardo D, Brunetti-Pierri N. Identification of small molecules enhancing autophagic function from drug network analysis. Autophagy. 2010;6:1204–1205. [PubMed]
8. Iorio F, Saez-Rodriguez J, di Bernardo D. Network based elucidation of drug response: from modulators to targets. BMC Syst Biol. 2013;7:139. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Dudley JT, Deshpande T, Butte AJ. Exploiting drug-disease relationships for computational drug repositioning. Brief Bioinform. 2011;12:303–311. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Vanhaesebroeck B, Stephens L, Hawkins P. PI3K signalling: the path to discovery and understanding. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13:195–203. [PubMed]
11. Dibble CC, Cantley LC. Regulation of mTORC1 by PI3K signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 2015 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Wong KK, Engelman JA, Cantley LC. Targeting the PI3K signaling pathway in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2010;20:87–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Janku F, Wheler JJ, Naing A, Stepanek VM, Falchook GS, Fu S, Garrido-Laguna I, Tsimberidou AM, Piha-Paul SA, Moulder SL, Lee JJ, Luthra R, Hong DS, Kurzrock R. PIK3CA mutations in advanced cancers: characteristics and outcomes. Oncotarget. 2012;3:1566–1575. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.716. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Janku F, Wheler JJ, Naing A, Falchook GS, Hong DS, Stepanek VM, Fu S, Piha-Paul SA, Lee JJ, Luthra R, Tsimberidou AM, Kurzrock R. PIK3CA mutation H1047R is associated with response to PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway inhibitors in early-phase clinical trials. Cancer Res. 2013;73:276–284. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Samuels Y, Velculescu VE. Oncogenic mutations of PIK3CA in human cancers. Cell Cycle. 2004;3:1221–1224. [PubMed]
16. Gewinner C, Wang ZC, Richardson A, Teruya-Feldstein J, Etemadmoghadam D, Bowtell D, Barretina J, Lin WM, Rameh L, Salmena L, Pandolfi PP, Cantley LC. Evidence that inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II is a tumor suppressor that inhibits PI3K signaling. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:115–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Markman B, Tao JJ, Scaltriti M. PI3K pathway inhibitors: better not left alone. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19:895–906. [PubMed]
18. Serra V, Markman B, Scaltriti M, Eichhorn PJ, Valero V, Guzman M, Botero ML, Llonch E, Atzori F, Di Cosimo S, Maira M, Garcia-Echeverria C, Parra JL, Arribas J, Baselga J. NVP-BEZ235, a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, prevents PI3K signaling and inhibits the growth of cancer cells with activating PI3K mutations. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8022–8030. [PubMed]
19. Thorpe LM, Yuzugullu H, Zhao JJ. PI3K in cancer: divergent roles of isoforms, modes of activation and therapeutic targeting. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:7–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Chandarlapaty S, Sawai A, Scaltriti M, Rodrik-Outmezguine V, Grbovic-Huezo O, Serra V, Majumder PK, Baselga J, Rosen N. AKT inhibition relieves feedback suppression of receptor tyrosine kinase expression and activity. Cancer Cell. 2011;19:58–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Klempner SJ, Myers AP, Cantley LC. What a tangled web we weave: emerging resistance mechanisms to inhibition of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:1345–1354. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Lamb J, Crawford ED, Peck D, Modell JW, Blat IC, Wrobel MJ, Lerner J, Brunet JP, Subramanian A, Ross KN, Reich M, Hieronymus H, Wei G, Armstrong SA, Haggarty SJ, Clemons PA, et al. The Connectivity Map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease. Science. 2006;313:1929–1935. [PubMed]
23. Iorio F, Bosotti R, Scacheri E, Belcastro V, Mithbaokar P, Ferriero R, Murino L, Tagliaferri R, Brunetti-Pierri N, Isacchi A, di Bernardo D. Discovery of drug mode of action and drug repositioning from transcriptional responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14621–14626. [PubMed]
24. Carrella D, Napolitano F, Rispoli R, Miglietta M, Carissimo A, Cutillo L, Sirci F, Gregoretti F, Di Bernardo D. Mantra 2. 0: an online collaborative resource for drug mode of action and repurposing by network analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1787–1788. [PubMed]
25. Cardone L, Bardelli A, Avvedimento VE. Activation of beta-catenin by oncogenic PIK3CA and EGFR promotes resistance to glucose deprivation by inducing a strong antioxidant response. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37526. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Di Nicolantonio F, Arena S, Gallicchio M, Zecchin D, Martini M, Flonta SE, Stella GM, Lamba S, Cancelliere C, Russo M, Geuna M, Appendino G, Fantozzi R, Medico E, Bardelli A. Replacement of normal with mutant alleles in the genome of normal human cells unveils mutation-specific drug responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:20864–20869. [PubMed]
27. Wallin JJ, Guan J, Edgar KA, Zhou W, Francis R, Torres AC, Haverty PM, Eastham-Anderson J, Arena S, Bardelli A, Griffin S, Goodall JE, Grimshaw KM, Hoeflich KP, Torrance C, Belvin M, et al. Active PI3K pathway causes an invasive phenotype which can be reversed or promoted by blocking the pathway at divergent nodes. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36402. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Yang J, Shamji A, Matchacheep S, Schreiber SL. Identification of a small-molecule inhibitor of class Ia PI3Ks with cell-based screening. Chem Biol. 2007;14:371–377. [PubMed]
29. Fenner A. Prostate cancer: Niclosamide jumps the hurdle of enzalutamide resistance. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:424. [PubMed]
30. Harada Y, Ishii I, Hatake K, Kasahara T. Pyrvinium pamoate inhibits proliferation of myeloma/erythroleukemia cells by suppressing mitochondrial respiratory complex I and STAT3. Cancer Lett. 2012;319:83–88. [PubMed]
31. Osada T, Chen M, Yang XY, Spasojevic I, Vandeusen JB, Hsu D, Clary BM, Clay TM, Chen W, Morse MA, Lyerly HK. Antihelminth compound niclosamide downregulates Wnt signaling and elicits antitumor responses in tumors with activating APC mutations. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4172–4182. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Tomitsuka E, Kita K, Esumi H. An anticancer agent, pyrvinium pamoate inhibits the NADH-fumarate reductase system—a unique mitochondrial energy metabolism in tumour microenvironments. J Biochem. 2012;152:171–183. [PubMed]
33. Wang YC, Chao TK, Chang CC, Yo YT, Yu MH, Lai HC. Drug screening identifies niclosamide as an inhibitor of breast cancer stem-like cells. PLoS One. 2013;8:e74538. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Venerando A, Girardi C, Ruzzene M, Pinna LA. Pyrvinium pamoate does not activate protein kinase CK1, but promotes Akt/PKB down-regulation and GSK3 activation. Biochem J. 2013;452:131–137. [PubMed]
35. Roux PP, Shahbazian D, Vu H, Holz MK, Cohen MS, Taunton J, Sonenberg N, Blenis J. RAS/ERK signaling promotes site-specific ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation via RSK and stimulates cap-dependent translation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:14056–14064. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Zoncu R, Efeyan A, Sabatini DM. mTOR: from growth signal integration to cancer, diabetes and ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12:21–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Thoreen CC, Kang SA, Chang JW, Liu Q, Zhang J, Gao Y, Reichling LJ, Sim T, Sabatini DM, Gray NS. An ATP-competitive mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor reveals rapamycin-resistant functions of mTORC1. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:8023–8032. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Thoreen CC, Chantranupong L, Keys HR, Wang T, Gray NS, Sabatini DM. A unifying model for mTORC1-mediated regulation of mRNA translation. Nature. 2012;485:109–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Li J, Kim SG, Blenis J. Rapamycin: one drug, many effects. Cell Metab. 2014;19:373–379. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Larue L, Bellacosa A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in development and cancer: role of phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase/AKT pathways. Oncogene. 2005;24:7443–7454. [PubMed]
41. Xue G, Hemmings BA. PKB/Akt-dependent regulation of cell motility. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:393–404. [PubMed]
42. Squarize CH, Castilho RM, Bugge TH, Gutkind JS. Accelerated wound healing by mTOR activation in genetically defined mouse models. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10643. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Renner O, Blanco-Aparicio C, Grassow M, Canamero M, Leal JF, Carnero A. Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase by membrane localization of p110alpha predisposes mammary glands to neoplastic transformation. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9643–9653. [PubMed]
44. Baselga J. Targeting the phosphoinositide-3 (PI3) kinase pathway in breast cancer. Oncologist. 2011;16(Suppl 1):12–19. [PubMed]
45. Nahta R. Pharmacological strategies to overcome HER2 cross-talk and Trastuzumab resistance. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19:1065–1075. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Nevins JR, Potti A. Mining gene expression profiles: expression signatures as cancer phenotypes. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:601–609. [PubMed]
47. Balgi AD, Fonseca BD, Donohue E, Tsang TC, Lajoie P, Proud CG, Nabi IR, Roberge M. Screen for chemical modulators of autophagy reveals novel therapeutic inhibitors of mTORC1 signaling. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7124. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Fonseca BD, Diering GH, Bidinosti MA, Dalal K, Alain T, Balgi AD, Forestieri R, Nodwell M, Rajadurai CV, Gunaratnam C, Tee AR, Duong F, Andersen RJ, Orlowski J, Numata M, Sonenberg N, et al. Structure-activity analysis of niclosamide reveals potential role for cytoplasmic pH in control of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:17530–17545. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Balgi AD, Diering GH, Donohue E, Lam KK, Fonseca BD, Zimmerman C, Numata M, Roberge M. Regulation of mTORC1 signaling by pH. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21549. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC