PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of celljournalCell JournalRoyal InstituteSubmit a ManuscriptAlertsHomeCell Journal
 
Cell J. 2017 Apr-Jun; 19(1): 127–136.
Published online 2016 December 21. doi:  10.22074/cellj.2016.4133
PMCID: PMC5241509

Inhibitory Effect of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Co-Culture on Erythroid Differentiation of K562 Cells Compared to The Control Group

Abstract

Objective

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) reside in the bone marrow and control the process of hematopoiesis. They are an excellent instrument for regenerative treatment and co-culture with hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs).

Materials and Methods

In this experimental study, K562 cell lines were either treated with butyric acid and co-cultured with MSCs, or cultivated in a conditioned medium from MSCs plus butyric acid for erythroid differentiation. We used the trypan blue dye exclusion assay to determine cell counts and viability in each group. For each group, we separately assessed erythroid differentiation of the K562 cell line with Giemsa stain under light microscopy, expression of specific markers of erythroid cells by flowcytometry, and erythroidspecific gene expressions by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

Results

There was enhandced erythroid differentiation of K562 cells with butyric acid compared to the K562 cell line co-cultured with MSCs and butyric acid. Erythroid differentiation of the K562 cell line cultivated in conditioned medium with butyric acid was higher than the K562 cell line co-cultured with MSCs and butyric acid, but less than K562 cell line treated with butyric acid only.

Conclusion

Our results showed that MSCs significantly suppressed erythropoiesis. Therefore, MSCs would not be a suitable optimal treatment strategy for patients with erythroid leukemia.

Keywords: Mesenchymal Stem Cells, K562 Cells, Erythroid Differentiation

Introduction

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) reside in the bone marrow and support homing and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) (1). MSCs are the spindle shaped plastic-adherent cells derived from bone marrow, adipose, and other tissue sources that have the capability to self-renew and undergo multipotent differentiation in vitro (2). BMMSCs are stem/progenitor cells that can self-renew and differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, adipocytes, and neural cells (3, 4). BMMSCs express unique surface markers-STRO-1, CD29, ecto-5´-endonucleotidase (CD73), CD90, endoglin (CD105), CD146, Octamer-4 (Oct4), stage-specific embryonic antigen-4 (SSEA4), GD2 ganglioside and CD271 (low affinity nerve growth factor receptor) (1, 5). It is commonly thought that BMMSCs do not express hematopoietic cell markers CD14 and CD34 (3, 6-9).

BMMSCs can preserve long term hematopoiesis in vitro and support the expansion and proliferation of hematopoietic colony forming cells in conjunction with added exogenous cytokines (10).

BMMSCs derived from adults produce signals for proliferation and differentiation of HSCs and their progenitors during direct cell-cell contact (11). These cells secrete cytokines and growth factors for HSC fate (12-14).

MSCs attach to HSCs by adhesion molecules such as N-cadherin and β integrins. Cytokines released by MSCs such as KIT-L, SDF-1, and Ang1 support the growth and differentiation of HSCs by binding to Kit, CXCR4 and Tie2 receptors. While HSCs are attached to MSCs, the expression of Notch ligands (Jagged and Delta-like) in MSCs is enhanced through the Wnt signaling pathway. Expression of Notch receptors in HSCs is enhanced by sonic hedgehog (Shh) in HSCs and MSCs (15) in vitro and decreases the repertoire of HSCs in vivo (16).

Wnt signaling pathway multilineage differentiation of MSCs and sustains them in an undifferentiated state (17). This signaling pathway has an essential role in self-renewal, survival, and proliferation of HSCs in vitro (18, 19). Erythropoiesis is a regular, continuous process in which HSCs proliferate and differentiate into mature red blood cells. The process is controlled by growth factors and cytokines. The most important growth factors are EPO and SCF (20, 21). The effects of MSCs on erythroid and myeloid differentiation may be due to specific cytokine lineage secreted by MSCs. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and IL-6 secreted by MSCs are involved in the differentiation of HSCs in vitro. G-CSF is a key factor in myeloid differentiation and IL-6 in combination with SCF-induced proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells (22, 23).

MSCs are injected parallel to HSCs to enhance bone marrow transplantations (24, 25). However, the effects of MSCs on hematopoietic cell differentiation and possible molecular pathways are not well understood. Therefore, in this study we have investigated the effect of MSCs on erythroid differentiation of induced K562 cells as an erythroid differentiation model.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture

K562 cell line culture

In this experimental study, the K562 cell line (Pasteur Institute, Iran) was cultivated in RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, UK), 100 U/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.2 mmol/L-glutamine (Gibco, UK) at 37˚C in a humidified incubator with a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells (1×105cells per ml) were cultured for five days and passaged every two days to maintain a log phase growth.

Mesenchymal stem cell culture

BMMSCs were cultured in complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium-low glucose (DMEM, Gibco, UK) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 U/ml streptomycin, and 0.2 mmol/L glutamine at 37˚C in a humidified incubator with an atmosphere of 5% CO2. The cells were passaged until 60% confluency. The characterized BMMSCs were prepared from StemCell Technology Company, (Iran).

Assessment of cell viability

Cell counts and cell viability were determined by trypan blue dye (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) exclusion. Viable and nonviable cells were counted with a hemocytometer.

Induction of erythroid differentiation (drug treatments)

Induction of K562 erythroid differentiation was carried out by 1 mM butyric acid (Orto, Germany) in K562 cells (1×105/ml) for 24, 4, 8 or 72 hours.

Culture of K562 cells with conditioned medium

K562 cells were cultured in conditioned medium with 1 mM butyric acid at 37˚C and 5% CO2. The conditioned medium was RPMI-1640 medium in which MSCs were cultured at 37˚C and 5% CO2 for 24 hours. The culture supernatant was collected and cultured with K562 cells.

K562 cells co-cultured with mesenchymal stem cells

MSCs (1×104/cm2) were cultured in a flask at 37˚C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Once the cells reached 60% confluency, we added K562 cells (1×105/ml) and 1 mM butyric acid. The co- culture was incubated at 37˚C in 5% CO2.

Morphological assessment of erythroid differentiation

The cells were spread on collagen slides (slides suspended in collagen for 24 hours) and stained with Giemsa. Morphological assessment was visualized by light microscopy with oil immersion.

Assessment of erythroid differentiation by flowcytometry

Erythroid differentiation of the cells was assessed by flowcytometry. In order to determine erythroid differentiation, we analyzed glycophorin A (GPA) on a surface of the differentiated cells by flowcytometry. The cells (1×105) were harvested, washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) by centrifuging at 3500 g for 5 minutes at room temperature. Next, they were incubated with anti-GPA monoclonal antibody conjugated with FITC (Dako Cytomation, Denmark) at 4˚C for 30 minutes in the dark and analyzed with a FACSCalibur™ (Becton Dickinson, USA).

RNA isolation and real-time polymerase chain reaction

RNA was extracted by QIAzol (Qiagen, USA) from untreated and treated cultured K562 cells, after which cDNA was synthesized using 1 µg of total RNA and a cDNA synthesis kit (RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, Fermentas, USA). Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to detect expression of the erythroid geneby the One-Step Quantitech SyberGreen Real Time PCR kit (ABI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For RNA extraction, we collected a 106 K562 cell suspension after which one ml of QIAzol (Qiagen, USA) was added to the tubes and vortexed. The cells were incubated at -80˚C for 4-24 hours. Then, 200 µl chloroform was added to each tube. Samples were incubated at 4˚C for 5 minutes and centrifuged at 15000-20000 rpm at 4˚C for 30 minutes. After centrifugation, the supernatant was transferred to new microtubes and RNase-free isopropanol (100%) was added in the same volume. The microtubes were centrifuged at 18000 rpm at 4˚C for 20 minutes. The supernatant was removed and the RNA sediment was washed with a 75% ethanol solution. The washing step was repeated twice after which the supernatant was gently removed from the microtubes and left at room temperature for 10-30 minutes to dry. RNA was dissolved in 20 µl of Diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) water. Finally, the RNA concentration was measured with a spectrophotometer (Picodrop, Uk).

cDNA synthesis

Briefly, for cDNA synthesis, we initially mixed 1 µg of RNA with 1 µl of the random hexamer primer and added nuclease-free water up to 12 µl. Subsequently the tubes were incubated at 65˚C for 5 minutes in a Thermocycler (Sensquest) after which the tubes were placed on ice (4˚C) and the following reagents were added: We placed the tubes in a Thermocycler and amplified cDNA with the following program of 5 minutes at 25˚C, 60 minutes at 42˚C, and 5 minutes at 70˚C.

Table 1
Reagents for cDNA synthesis

Assessment of gene expression by real-time polymerase chain reaction

The relative expressions of specific genes in the erythrocytes were assessed by RT-PCR after a 48-hour incubation period. We used RT-PCR to determine expressions of the following genes: AHSP, EPB42, FECH, ANK1, GLRX5, GATA2, NFE2, HBA2, HBB, HBG2, GYPA, and TFRC. We added 5 µl of 2X qPCR/ RTD-PCR Master Mix E4 (SYBR Green AB Kit); 1 µl of an up-stream primer and 1 µl of a down-stream primer (maximum concentration: 200 nM, Metabion, Germany); 1 µl of cDNA (100 ng); and 2 µl of ddH2O to amplify the genes. Reactions were run in a RT- PCR device (AB Applied Biosystems, Stepone Realtime PCR) for 10 minutes at 95˚C, then 40 cycles as follows: 15 seconds at 95˚C and 60 seconds at 55-65˚C. GAPDH was the internal control.

Table 2
Primers for real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Statistical analysis

Data were investigated by GraphPad Prism version 6.00 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). We used the student’s t test for single comparisons and one- way ANOVA for multi-group comparisons. The data were shown as mean ± S.D. P<0.01 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

CD235a (GYPA) expressing cell population decreased in K562 cells co-cultured with mesenchymal stem cells

The K562 cell’s co-cultured with MSCs and those K562 cells cultivated in conditioned medium with 1 mM butyric acid had decreased expression of CD235a (GYPA), the erythroid differentiation marker, as assessed by flow cytometry after 48 hours. The K562 cells with butyric acid had higher expression of CD235a compared to those co-cultured with MSCs and K562 cells cultured in conditioned medium. There was higher expression of this marker in K562 cells cultured with conditioned medium compared to K562 cells co-cultured with MSCs.

Morphological study of K562 cells in different conditions

K562 cells treated with 1 mM butyric acid and K562 cells co-cultured with MSCs and 1 mM butyric acid after a 48-hour incubation period were stained by Wright Giemsa.

Gene expressions analysis of AHSP, EPB42, FECH, ANK1, GLRX5, GATA2, NFE2, HBA2, HBB, HBG2, GYPA, TFRC in the various cell groups

The butyric acid treated K562 cells had highly increase dexpressions of GYPA, HBB, HBA2, NFE2, and FECH; no significant increase in ANK1, HBG2, GATA2, and AHSP expressions; and decreased expressions of TFRC and GLRX5.

K562, cells co-cultured with MSCs had significantly increased expressions of HBA2, GYPA, HBB, FECH, and NFE2; no significant increase in expressions of HBG2, GATA2, ANK1, and AHSP; and decreased expressions of TFRC and GLRX5.

K562 cells cultured in conditioned medium had significantly increased expressions of HBA2, NFE2, GLRX5, HBB, and GYPA; no significant increase in FECH, ANK1, GATA2, HBG2, and AHSP; and a decrease in TFRC expression. In this study, the EPB42 gene was also examined, but showed no evidence of expression in any of the groups.

Fig.1
Flow cytometric analysis of erythroid marker differentiation after 48 hours. A. K562, B. K562+butyric acid (1 mM), C. K562+butyric acid (1 mM)+ mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and D. K562+butyric acid (1 mM) in conditioned medium.
Fig.2
Microscopic analysis of k562 cell differentiation after 48 hours. A. Morphology of K562 cells (control), B. K562 cells treated with butyric acid (1 mM), C. Co-culture of K562 cells with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and D. K562 cells plus butyric acid ...
Fig.3
Gene expressions during differentiation of K562 cells after 48 hours. A. GYPA, B. NFE2, C. AHSP, D. ANK1, E. FECH, F. GATA2, G. TFRC, H. HBG2, I. HBA2, J. HBB, and K. GLRX5.

Discussion

BMMSCs produce a variety of cytokines and extracellular matrix proteins to construct the bone marrow niche. Accordingly, the MSC feeder layer could be an appropriate model system to study HSCs in vitro (26). Studies have demonstrated that MSCs play a fundamental role in maintenance of stemness of HSCs in addition to their homing, proliferation, and differentiation (11, 27, 28). MSCs can influence various cell types, including leukemic cells (29, 30). Therefore, regarding the interaction of MSCs with leukemic cancer stem cells, these cells can be applied as an adjunctive therapy in leukemia treatment.

Several researches on the co-culture of MSCs with HSCs confirmed that MSCs supported HSCs selfrenewal, proliferation, and differentiation (31-34). Fonseka et al. (35) showed that human umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs (hUCB-MSCs) were remarkably able to inhibit proliferation of K562 leukemic cells via cell-cell interactions. MSC sarrested the cell cycle of K562 cells at the G0/ G1 phase and prevented their entrance into the S phase. In this process, MSCs might secrete some anti-tumor cytokines such as interleukin-6 and -8.

Other studies demonstrated that BMMSCs from leukemia patients and normal individuals facilitated the proliferation and viability of K562 cells. Obvious suppression was seen in both cocultured MSCs and conditioned medium from MSCs (30). Han et al. (36) reported that the expansion of K562 cells drastically decreased when co-cultured with BMMSCs. Other studies showed that MSCs prevented K562 proliferation via the Wnt signaling pathway. They suggested that cell-cell contacts between MSCs and K562 cells induced the production of soluble factors such asdickkopf-1 (DKK1) which has been shown to suppress the Wnt signaling pathway and subsequently inhibit K562 expansion (37, 38). Other investigations demonstrated that soluble factors released by MSCs had more effect on inhibition of HSCs apoptosis and maintenance of their proliferation rather than direct cell-cell interaction. They showed that MSCs affected myeloid differentiation rather than erythropoiesis. Although there was an increased differentiation of myeloid cells, there were more erythroid cells in the control group (K562 cultured without MSCs). This implied that MSCs might have a supportive effect on erythroid differentiation (31).

Many studies have examined the co-culture of K562 cells with MSCs and the effect of MSCs on proliferation and apoptosis of this cell line. In this study, we investigated the effect of MSCs on erythroid differentiation of K562 cells in an induced situation.

We used RT-PCR to analyze the erythroidspecific gene expressions in K562 cells under three conditions: K562 cells treated with butyric acid; K562 cells co-cultured with MSCs and butyric acid; and K562 cells cultivated in conditioned medium from MSCs with butyric acid. Erythroidspecific genes analyzed included: AHSP, EPB42, FECH, ANK1, GLRX5, GATA2, NFE2, HBA2, HBB, HBG2, GYPA, and TFRC.

HBA and HBB are expressed in mature erythroid cells; these genes are essential for producing hemoglobin A by encoding α and β globins (39). We have shown that MSCs inhibited expressions of these genes. The transcription factors nuclear factor-erythroid 2 (NFE2) is an essential regulator of erythroid specific gene expression, composed of two subunits (p45 and p18). P54 is expressed in mature erythroid cells and other differentiated hematopoietic cell lines such as granulocytes, megakaryocytes, and mast cells (40). NFE2 was suppressed by MSCs. Other erythroid specific genes did not show significant expressions. Hence, additional research is necessary to analyze these genes.

We found that MSCs decreased the differential effect of butyric acid on K562 cells. Our results demonstrated that K562 cells co-cultured with MSCs had less erythroid differentiation than K562 cells, which were cultured with conditioned medium. Soluble factors secreted by MSCs appeared to be less effective than cell-cell interactions. Various cytokines secreted by MSCs (IL-6 and G-CSF) have been shown to participate in differentiation and hematopoiesis of HSCs in vitro (23). It seems that these cytokines may play a critical role in erythroid differentiation of the K562 cell line.

Conclusion

Several studies researched the effect MSCs on proliferation, expansion, and apoptosis when co-cultured with K562 cells. Results of these studies were varied and sometimes contradictory. In the current study, MSCs have decreased erythroid differentiation of K562 cells. Additionally, our data demonstrated that cell-cell contact between MSCs and K562 cells suppressed erythroid differentiation. Although soluble factors secreted by MSCs might have few effects on erythroid differentiation, conditioned medium decreased the differential effect of butyric acid on K562 cells; this reduction was not less than that observed in cell-cell contact. Additional studies should be conducted in order to determine the cellular mechanisms of the effect of MSCs on differentiation of K562 cells.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the East Azerbaijan Province Blood Transfusion Headquarters for their provision of the laboratory facility. We express our appreciation to Tabriz University of Medical Sciences for financial support of this research. There are no conflicts of interest in this study.

References

1. Gang EJ, Bosnakovski D, Figueiredo CA, Visser JW, Perlingeiro RC. SSEA-4 identifies mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow. Blood. 2007;109(4):1743–1751. [PubMed]
2. Keating A. Mesenchymal stromal cells. Curr Opin Hematol. 2006;13(6):419–425. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Akiyama K, You YO, Yamaza T, Chen C, Tang L, Jin Y, et al. Characterization of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells in suspension. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2012;3(5):40–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Prockop DJ. Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science. 1997;276(5309):71–74. [PubMed]
5. Greco SJ, Liu K, Rameshwar P. Functional similarities among genes regulated by OCT4 in human mesenchymal and embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2007;25(12):3143–3154. [PubMed]
6. Shi S, Gronthos S, Chen S, Reddi A, Counter CM, Robey PG, et al. Bone formation by human postnatal bone marrow stromal stem cells is enhanced by telomerase expression. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(6):587–591. [PubMed]
7. Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V. Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(9):726–736. [PubMed]
8. Conget PA, Minguell JJ. Phenotypical and functional properties of human bone marrow mesenchymal progenitor cells. J Cell Physiol. 1999;181(1):67–73. [PubMed]
9. Covas DT, Panepucci RA, Fontes AM, Silva WA Jr, Orellana MD, Freitas MC, et al. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells obtained from diverse human tissues share functional properties and gene-expression profile with CD146+ perivascular cells and fibroblasts. Exp Hematol. 2008;36(5):642–654. [PubMed]
10. Tocci A, Luchetti L, Gallazzi A, Pinto RM, Arduini D, Bottazzo GF, et al. Pediatric bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells favor the expansion of primitive over committed cord blood progenitor cells and modulate the effect of oncostatin M. Blood. 2001;98(11 Part 2):4258–4258.
11. Torok-Storb B. Cellular interactions. Blood. 1988;72(2):373–385. [PubMed]
12. Moreau I, Duvert V, Caux C, Galmiche MC, Charbord P, Banchereau J, et al. Myofibroblastic stromal cells isolated from human bone marrow induce the proliferation of both early myeloid and B-lymphoid cells. Blood. 1993;82(8):2396–2405. [PubMed]
13. Cherry, Yasumizu R, Toki J, Asou H, Nishino T, Komatsu Y, et al. Production of hematopoietic stem cell-chemotactic factor by bone marrow stromal cells. Blood. 1994;83(4):964–971. [PubMed]
14. Guerriero A, Worford L, Holland HK, Guo GR, Sheehan K, Waller EK. Thrombopoietin is synthesized by bone marrow stromal cells. Blood. 1997;90(9):3444–3455. [PubMed]
15. Kikuchi Y, Kume A, Urabe M, Mizukami H, Suzuki T, Ozaki K, et al. Reciprocal upregulation of Notch signaling molecules in hematopoietic progenitor and mesenchymal stromal cells. J Stem Cells Regen Med. 2011;7(2):61–68. eCollection 2011. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Duncan AW, Rattis FM, DiMascio LN, Congdon KL, Pazianos G, Zhao C, et al. Integration of Notch and Wnt signaling in hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(3):314–322. [PubMed]
17. Kirstetter P, Anderson K, Porse BT, Jacobsen SE, Nerlov C. Activation of the canonical Wnt pathway leads to loss of hematopoietic stem cell repopulation and multilineage differentiation block. Nat Immunol. 2006;7(10):1048–1056. [PubMed]
18. Reya T, Duncan AW, Ailles L, Domen J, Scherer DC, Willert K, et al. A role for Wnt signalling in self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2003;423(6938):409–414. [PubMed]
19. Campbell C, Risueno RM, Salati S, Guezguez B, Bhatia M. Signal control of hematopoietic stem cell fate: Wnt, Notch, and Hedgehog as the usual suspects. Curr Opin Hematol. 2008;15(4):319–325. [PubMed]
20. Muta K, Krantz SB, Bondurant MC, Wickrema A. Distinct roles of erythropoietin, insulin-like growth factor I, and stem cell factor in the development of erythroid progenitor cells. J Clin Invest. 1994;94(1):34–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Dolznig H, Habermann B, Stangl K, Deiner EM, Moriggl R, Beug H, et al. Apoptosis protection by the Epo target BclX(L) allows factor-independent differentiation of primary erythroblasts. Curr Biol. 2002;12(13):1076–1085. [PubMed]
22. Panopoulos AD, Watowich SS. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: molecular mechanisms of action during steady state and 'emergency' hematopoiesis. Cytokine. 2008;42(3):277–288. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Heike T, Nakahata T. Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells by cytokines. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1592(3):313–321. [PubMed]
24. Sohni A, Verfaillie CM. Mesenchymal stem cells migration homing and tracking. Stem Cells Int. 2013;2013:130763–130763. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Nakamizo A, Marini F, Amano T, Khan A, Studeny M, Gumin J, et al. Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of gliomas. Cancer Res. 2005;65(8):3307–3318. [PubMed]
26. Wagner W, Saffrich R, Ho AD. The stromal activity of mesenchymal stromal cells. Transfus Med and Hemother. 2008;35(3):185–193. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Alakel N, Jing D, Muller K, Bornhauser M, Ehninger G, Ordemann R. Direct contact with mesenchymal stromal cells affects migratory behavior and gene expression profile of CD133+ hematopoietic stem cells during ex vivo expansion. Exp Hematol. 2009;37(4):504–513. [PubMed]
28. Zheng J, Umikawa M, Zhang S, Huynh H, Silvany R, Chen BP, et al. Ex vivo expanded hematopoietic stem cells overcome the MHC barrier in allogeneic transplantation. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9(2):119–130. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Sarmadi VH, Tong CK, Vidyadaran S, Abdullah M, Seow HF, Ramasamy R. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit proliferation of lymphoid origin haematopoietic tumour cells by inducing cell cycle arrest. Med J Malaysia. 2010;65(3):209–214. [PubMed]
30. Wei Z, Chen N, Guo H, Wang X, Xu F, Ren Q, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from leukemia patients inhibit growth and apoptosis in serum-deprived K562 cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28:141–141. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Lazar-Karsten P, Dorn I, Meyer G, Lindner U, Driller B, Schlenke P. The influence of extracellular matrix proteins and mesenchymal stem cells on erythropoietic cell maturation. Vox Sang. 2011;101(1):65–76. [PubMed]
32. Jang YK, Jung DH, Jung MH, Kim DH, Yoo KH, Sung KW, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells feeder layer from human umbilical cord blood for ex vivo expanded growth and proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Ann Hematol. 2006;85(4):212–225. [PubMed]
33. Harvey K, Dzierzak E. Cell-cell contact and anatomical compatibility in stromal cell-mediated HSC support during development. Stem Cells. 2004;22(3):253–258. [PubMed]
34. Wang JF, Wang LJ, Wu YF, Xiang Y, Xie CG, Jia BB, et al. Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in human umbilical cord blood as support for ex vivo expansion of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells and for chondrogenic differentiation. Haematologica. 2004;89(7):837–844. [PubMed]
35. Fonseka M, Ramasamy R, Tan BC, Seow HF. Human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSC) inhibit the proliferation of K562 (human erythromyeloblastoid leukaemic cell line) Cell Biol Int. 2012;36(9):793–801. [PubMed]
36. Han Y, Wang Y, Xu Z, Li J, Yang J, Li Y, et al. Effect of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from blastic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia on the growth and apoptosis of leukemia cells. Oncol Rep. 2013;30(2):1007–1013. [PubMed]
37. Wong RS, Cheong SK. Role of mesenchymal stem cells in leukaemia: Dr.Jekyll or Mr.Hyde? Clin Exp Med. 2014;14(3):235–248. [PubMed]
38. Zhu Y, Sun Z, Han Q, Liao L, Wang J, Bian C, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells inhibit cancer cell proliferation by secreting DKK-1. Leukemia. 2009;23(5):925–933. [PubMed]
39. Marini MG, Porcu L, Asunis I, Loi MG, Ristaldi MS, Porcu S, et al. Regulation of the human HBA genes by KLF4 in erythroid cell lines. Br J Haematol. 2010;149(5):748–758. [PubMed]
40. Catani L, Vianelli N, Amabile M, Pattacini L, Valdrè L, Fagioli ME, et al. Nuclear factor-erythroid 2 (NF-E2) expression in normal and malignant megakaryocytopoiesis. Leukemia. 2002;16(9):1773–1781. [PubMed]

Articles from Cell Journal (Yakhteh) are provided here courtesy of Royan Institute